Next Article in Journal
A System Dynamics Model to Assess the Effectiveness of Governmental Support Policies for Renewable Electricity
Next Article in Special Issue
Circular Economy Strategies in Eight Historic Port Cities: Criteria and Indicators Towards a Circular City Assessment Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Identifying Dominant Stakeholder Perspectives on Sustainability Issues in Reefer Transportation. A Q-Method Study in the Port of Rotterdam
Previous Article in Special Issue
Circular Economy and Resilience Thinking for Historic Urban Landscape Regeneration: The Case of Torre Annunziata, Naples
Article

The Circular Regeneration of a Seaport

Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London WC1H 0NN, UK
Sustainability 2019, 11(12), 3424; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123424
Received: 28 April 2019 / Revised: 12 June 2019 / Accepted: 17 June 2019 / Published: 21 June 2019
This paper seeks to operationalize the circular city concept for the process of regenerating a city port. It draws on a detailed case study—Stockholm Royal Seaport (SRSP)—and uses systems mapping techniques to understand the process. The paper develops a theoretical conceptualisation of a circular urban regeneration process. It reflects on how such a framing might be applied to a port system. The research explores the dimensions and dynamics of a circular regeneration process. It provides evidence to support the benefits of combining circular actions—loop, regenerate and adapt—in a successful regeneration process. It indicates how these circular actions will interact with other sustainable strategies (support actions) adopted in a city port (e.g., optimisation, substitution, sharing, etc.). This begins to provide an indication of the combination of actions which might be successfully applied. Finally, a performance framework for monitoring the development of “circular capacities” through the regeneration process in a port system is presented and tested in SRSP. The paper evaluates whether existing sustainability indicators would provide adequate information for performance monitoring. It finds that in the case of SRSP sustainability reporting currently does not provide adequate information for a robust evaluation to be completed. However, the investigation does begin to identify what data should be collected for performance monitoring. View Full-Text
Keywords: circular cities; circular economy; urban regeneration; port regeneration; sustainable development circular cities; circular economy; urban regeneration; port regeneration; sustainable development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Williams, J. The Circular Regeneration of a Seaport. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123424

AMA Style

Williams J. The Circular Regeneration of a Seaport. Sustainability. 2019; 11(12):3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Williams, Joanna. 2019. "The Circular Regeneration of a Seaport" Sustainability 11, no. 12: 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123424

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop