Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Factors Affecting Real-Time Ridesharing Vehicle Crash Severity
Next Article in Special Issue
Using CFD Modelling to Relate Pig Lying Locations to Environmental Variability in Finishing Pens
Previous Article in Journal
Mutual Support, Role Breadth Self-Efficacy, and Sustainable Job Performance of Workers in Young Firms
Open AccessReview

Sustainability of Pork Production with Immunocastration in Europe

Department of Behavioral Physiology of Livestock, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
ILVO (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
Department of Feeding and Nutrition—Physiology, Environment, and Genetics for the Animal and Livestock Systems, Institut national de la recherche agronomique, Agrocampus Quest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(12), 3335;
Received: 22 May 2019 / Revised: 7 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 June 2019 / Published: 17 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Pig Production)
Immunocastration, a technique to replace surgical castration of piglets, consists of two consecutive vaccinations to induce antibodies which transiently suppress testicular functions and avoid boar taint. It is a method to ensure both a high product quality and a high level of animal welfare. The impact of immunocastration on the three pillars of sustainability has been studied extensively. While all aspects of sustainability have been studied separately, however, a contemporary global overview of different aspects is missing. In immunocastrates, performance results are better than in barrows, but worse than in boars. The environmental impact of pork production with immunocastrates is lower than with barrows, but higher than with boars. The level of aggression is considerably lower in immunocastrates compared to boars. Societal concerns are mainly related to food safety, and are not supported by scientific evidence. After second vaccination, immunocastrates switch from a boar- to a barrow-like status. Therefore, the timing of second vaccination is a fine-tuning tool to balance advantages of boars with environmental and economic benefits against increased risk of welfare problems and boar taint. Nevertheless, both synergic and conflicting relationships between the pillars of sustainability must be communicated along the value chain to produce tailored pork products. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability; immunocastration; carbon footprint; animal welfare; food safety; pork production; boars; surgical castration sustainability; immunocastration; carbon footprint; animal welfare; food safety; pork production; boars; surgical castration
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kress, K.; Millet, S.; Labussière, É.; Weiler, U.; Stefanski, V. Sustainability of Pork Production with Immunocastration in Europe. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3335.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop