Next Article in Journal
Construction of Open Innovation Ecology on the Internet: A Case Study of Xiaomi (China) Using Institutional Logic
Next Article in Special Issue
From the Anthropocene to Mutual Thriving: An Agenda for Higher Education in the Ecozoic
Previous Article in Journal
Statistical and Electrical Features Evaluation for Electrical Appliances Energy Disaggregation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics

The Case for Studying Non-Market Food Systems

by 1,2
Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Sustainability 2019, 11(11), 3224;
Received: 6 May 2019 / Revised: 29 May 2019 / Accepted: 6 June 2019 / Published: 11 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Research Agenda for Ecological Economics)
Markets dominate the world’s food systems. Today’s food systems fail to realize the normative foundations of ecological economics: justice, sustainability, efficiency, and value pluralism. Drawing on empirical and theoretical literature from diverse intellectual traditions, I argue that markets, as an institution for governing food systems, hinder the realization of these objectives. Markets allocate food toward money, not hunger. They encourage shifting costs on others, including nonhuman nature. They rarely signal unsustainability, and in many ways cause it. They do not resemble the efficient markets of economic theory. They organize food systems according to exchange value at the expense of all other social, cultural, spiritual, moral, and environmental values. I argue that food systems can approach the objectives of ecological economics roughly to the degree that they subordinate market mechanisms to social institutions that embody those values. But such “embedding” processes, whether through creating state policy or alternative markets, face steep barriers and can only partially remedy food markets’ inherent shortcomings. Thus, ecological economists should also study, promote, and theorize non-market food systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecological economics; markets; embeddedness; justice; sustainability; efficiency; values ecological economics; markets; embeddedness; justice; sustainability; efficiency; values
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bliss, S. The Case for Studying Non-Market Food Systems. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3224.

AMA Style

Bliss S. The Case for Studying Non-Market Food Systems. Sustainability. 2019; 11(11):3224.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bliss, Sam. 2019. "The Case for Studying Non-Market Food Systems" Sustainability 11, no. 11: 3224.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop