Results were obtained with respect to the 545 observations. Eighty-three percent of respondents were women and 17% were men. Persons aged between 20 and 30 accounted for 66% of respondents, respondents aged between 31 and 40 for 22% or 120 observations, respondents aged between 41 and 50 for 7%, and the smallest group of respondents (5%) were people over 51 years of age. The respondents were aggregated into two age groups for this study: From 20 to 40 years of age (88% of respondents) and over 41 (12% of respondents).
Thirty-seven percent of respondents identified their profession as accountants, 15% as specialists in accounting and finance, and 12% of the respondents were students. In addition, 2% of respondents identified themselves as owners, and 23% of them worked in positions that were not listed in the questionnaire.
5.1. Gender Structure as a Determinant of Satisfaction and Prestige of the Accounting Profession
An important question was whether male and female accounting professionals are equally satisfied with their job. In the study, we attempted to answer this question in reference to hypothesis H1.1. There was a significant difference between male and female accounting professionals in their perceived job satisfaction. However, the linkage that explains the difference was not direct; rather, it was shaped by the different social environments in which the accountants (men and women) operate. In the hypothesis, we thus focused on the influence of different social contexts in shaping the satisfaction of male and female workers in the accounting profession.
According to the survey, approximately 79% of respondents were satisfied with their job. We checked whether the responses were different between male and female respondents using a χ2 test (
Table 3 Row 1). Satisfaction level was high, but the difference was insignificant between the two groups (χ2 Yates correction = 3.333,
p = 0.068).
We observed very little evidence that the difference in job satisfaction between male and female respondents was different according to social environments. When we analyzed satisfaction with respect to the variable FOR (companies with foreign equity investment) as shown in
Table 3 Row 2 and Row 3, we concluded that male respondents were not more satisfied with their job than women when they were employed in companies with foreign equity investment (χ2 Yates correction = 2.74,
p = 0.098). We also observed no difference in the job satisfaction level between male and female respondents when they were employed in companies with no foreign equity investment (χ2 Yates correction = 0.85,
p = 0.357).
The difference between the job satisfaction level between male and female respondents was, dependent on the industry in which they were employed (variable ACC_I), the company’s link with the accounting service industry, accounting service office, or auditing company, and companies operating in other industries. We analyzed these links in
Table 3 Row 4 and Row 5. In accounting and auditing companies, there was no difference in the level of job satisfaction between male and female respondents (χ2 Yates correction = 0.81,
p = 0.368,
Table 3 Row 4). When the company operated in industries other than accounting services, we observed a significantly smaller share of male respondents satisfied with their job than for female respondents (χ2 Yates correction = 6.82,
p = 0.009,
Table 3 Row 5).
We also analyzed whether the difference between the level of job satisfaction with their profession between male and female respondents was dependent on the size of the company. The results of the tests have been tabulated in
Table 3 Row 6 and Row 7 and do not show any significant difference between the level of satisfaction with their profession between male and female respondents in small or medium/large-sized companies (in small companies, χ2 Yates correction = 1.56,
p = 0.211), and in medium/large-sized companies, χ2 Yates correction = 1.59,
p = 0.207).
Next, we expanded the tests to examine the relationship between gender and the perception of financial job satisfaction (
Table 3 Rows 8–14). By financial job satisfaction, we understand perceived satisfaction as correlated with remuneration from job (in other words salary satisfaction).
Table 3 Row 8 shows that, generally, there were no significant differences between men and women when it came to financial job satisfaction (χ2 Yates correction = 3.73,
p = 0.054), which is on the borderline of the 0.05 acceptance level.
There were, some differences in the level of financial job satisfaction between men and women in different social environments. We can conclude the following from the results:
In companies without foreign equity investment, the proportion of satisfied men was significantly higher than that of women, which cannot be said for companies with foreign equity investment, where there was no difference (
Table 2 Row 9 and Row 10). For the categories of accounting firms, auditing firms, or other companies and institutions, we found no difference (
Table 3 Row 11 and Row 12).
In small companies, there was a greater proportion of men satisfied with their remuneration than women, and in medium/large companies, there was no difference (
Table 3 Row 13 and Row 14).
Fundamentally, we have not confirmed hypothesis H1.1. The obtained results indicate no significant difference between men and women in the level of job satisfaction. It was noted that when a company operated in industries other than accounting services, a smaller share of male respondents were satisfied with their job. The correlation between financial satisfaction and gender was significant only in some social environments. We note that women’s financial satisfaction with their job was lower than that of men in small companies as well as in companies without any foreign equity investment.
Another problem analyzed in conjunction with hypothesis H1.2 relates to the perceived decreasing prestige of the accounting profession. We analyzed whether there is a significant difference between men and women in this respect. For that, we used the χ2 test (
Table 4 Row 1). The perceived decreasing prestige of the accounting profession was not high (26%), and the difference was insignificant between the two groups (χ2 Yates correction = 1.37,
p = 0.242).
The difference in the perceived decreasing prestige between male and female respondents was insignificant both in companies with foreign equity investment and in companies without (
Table 4 Row 2 and Row 3).
The perceived decreasing prestige of the accounting profession did not differ between male and female respondents when we considered the industry in which the accountant worked, i.e., accounting and auditing companies (
Table 4 Row 4, χ2 Yates correction = 0.01,
p = 0.941) and other industries (
Table 4 Row 5, χ2 Yates correction = 1.96,
p = 0.162). We also found no evidence of any difference in the perceived decreasing prestige of the accounting profession between female and male respondents when we analyzed small and medium/large companies, i.e.,
Table 4 Row 6, χ2 Yates correction = 0.11,
p = 0.742 and Row 7, χ2 Yates correction = 2.39,
p = 0.122, respectively.
We tested whether female workers in the accounting profession more frequently indicated liberalization of the accounting profession in Poland as the main source of the decreasing prestige of the accounting profession. We excluded negative answers within the variable DEG and responses that indicated ‘no opinions’ in the variable LIB. The results are presented in
Table 4 Row 8. Approximately 85% of respondents indicated that the liberalization of the accounting profession is the main source of the profession’s decreasing prestige. However, we found no evidence that the views of female and male respondents were different (
Table 4 Row 8, χ2 Yates correction = 0.05,
p = 0.827).
From the results, we conclude that there is no difference between male and female accounting professionals in their perceived decreasing prestige of the accounting profession, even when we analyzed the different social environments in which the accountants (men and women) operate. We therefore do not confirm hypothesis H1.2.
As highlighted earlier, one of the factors influencing the perception of job satisfaction is the degree of cooperation with management. According to hypothesis H1.3, we expected that the perceived quality of cooperation between accounting staff and senior management in companies would be significantly lower for female respondents. We also expected that women would indicate more frequently that they are overutilized by their employers, and that they feel compelled to be more available by their employers. This regularity may, however, be shaped by different social environments in which the accountants operate.
We analyzed the statistical significance of the differences between the distribution of the perceived cooperation between accounting staff and senior management for female and male respondents (variable AMR) using the
U Mann–Whitney test. The outcomes of the test are shown in the first row of
Table 5. Contrary to hypothesis H1.3, female respondents did not perceive cooperation between accounting staff and senior management more critically than male respondents. The distributions of the perceived cooperation between accounting staff and senior management were not different (
U = 15488.5,
p = 0.554). We also tested whether the relevant distribution of AMR was different between female and male respondents in different social environments, taking into account different criteria and using the
U Mann–Whitney test. The results are displayed in
Table 5 (rows 2–7). In all social environments (respondents working in companies operating in industries other than accounting services, those working in accounting and auditing companies, and those working in small and medium/large companies), we did not observe any difference in the distributions of the AMR variable.
We also tested whether, in some social environments, female respondents perceived that they were more frequently overutilized by employers as per hypothesis H1.4. We carried out relevant tests using the χ2 statistics with the Yates correction. The outcomes in some environments are presented in
Table 6 Part 6.1 and 6.2.
We concluded from the results that the perceived overutilization by employers was not significantly different between male and female respondents in all social environments that we examined (taking into account foreign equity investment, industry and its link with accounting services, as well as the size of the companies), not in accordance with hypothesis H1.4.
We hypothesized that women more frequently perceived high (excessive) pressure to be available by their employers. We carried out a test using the variable AV (perceived high (excessive) pressure to be available by their employers). After excluding responses with no answers, the responses indicated only moderate frequency of being excessively required to be available (166 responded yes (32%) and 352 responded no (68%)).
We analyzed whether there was a significant difference between male and female accounting professionals in their perceived overutilization by their employers using the χ2 test (
Table 6, part 6.1). The perceived overutilization by employers was rather moderate in the population (25% in the sample), and there were no differences between female and male respondents (χ2 Yates correction = 1.43,
p = 0.232).
We also tested whether, in some social environments, female respondents perceived that they were more frequently overutilized by employers. We carried out relevant tests using the χ2 statistics with the Yates correction. The outcomes in some environments are presented in
Table 6, part 6.2.
5.2. Age Structure as a Determinant of Satisfaction and the Prestige of the Accounting Profession
According to hypothesis H2.1, there is a significant negative correlation between the age of accounting professionals and their perceived job satisfaction. Younger professionals are assumed to be more satisfied with their job.
We analyzed whether younger professionals were indeed more satisfied with their job. We used a χ2 test with Yates correction (
Table 7 Parts 7.1 a and b) and used two measures for age:
- -
Variable A (Age): 1 (20–30 years old), 2 (31–40 years old), 3 (41–50 years old), and 4 (51+ years old);
- -
Variable A* (Age): 1 (20–40 years old), 2 (41+ years old).
When variable A* was used in the χ2 test, we adjusted the results with a Yates correction.
Generally, satisfaction was indicated very frequently in the sample (79%). Our results showed that younger respondents were indeed more frequently satisfied with their profession (χ2 Yates correction for variable A* = 8.89, p = 0.003), in accordance with hypothesis H2.1.
According to hypothesis H2.2, the perceived the decreasing prestige of the accounting profession in society to be positively linked to the age of accountants. We also expected older individuals in the profession to more frequently indicate the liberalization of the accounting profession as the main source of the decreasing prestige.
We tested the hypothesis using a χ2 test with a Yates correction (
Table 7 Part 7.2). We excluded the responses ‘no opinion’ for variables DEG, and consequently, we excluded the responses ‘no’ in variable DEG to analyze the link between perceived liberalization of the accounting profession and the age of respondents. We observed limited evidence of a positive link between age and the perceived decreasing prestige of the accounting profession in society (
Table 7 Part 7.2 a, χ2 Yates correction = 4.32,
p = 0.038).
We hypothesized in H2.3 a negative correlation between age and the perceived quality of cooperation between accounting staff and senior management in companies, as well as between age and the perceived quality of tasks performed in accounting departments in companies.
We tested for a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the perceived cooperation between accounting staff and senior management between older and younger respondents, and the distribution of the perceived quality of tasks performed in accounting departments between older and younger respondents using the
U Mann–Whitney test (variable A*) and Kruskal–Wallis test (variable A), respectively. The outcomes of the tests are displayed in
Table 7 Parts 7.3 and 7.4. The outcomes confirm the hypothesis. The distribution of the perceived cooperation between accounting staff and senior management (AMR) was significantly different between older and younger respondents (U = 9779,
p = 0.006), and the difference was consistent with the hypothesis H2.3 because older respondents were more critical of the assessment of cooperation between accounting staff and senior management. The results of the test are supported by the Kruskal–Wallis test for variable A (
Table 7 Part 7.4; H (3, N = 478) = 7.847
p = 0.049). The ranks for perceived quality of cooperation between accounting staff and senior management were significantly different between the age groups. A limitation to the results is that we did not observe differences in pair-wise comparisons.
According to hypothesis H2.4, we expected a positive correlation between age and the frequency of indicating perceived overutilization by employers. We expected older professionals to more frequently indicate that they were overutilized by their employers. Similarly, we expected a significantly higher perception of required and excessive availability by their employers, and lower (less frequent) perceived appreciation by the company among older accounting professionals.
We tested statistical significance of the difference in the frequency of indicating perceived overutilization between younger and older accounting professionals using a χ2 test with Yates correction (
Table 8 Part 8.1). We observed rather moderate frequency of perceived overutilization in the accounting profession (22%), and we observed that older accounting professionals indicated perceived overutilization by employers significantly more frequently, in accordance with hypothesis H2.4 (
Table 7 Part 7.1, χ2 Yates correction = 7.39,
p = 0.006).
Consistent with hypothesis H2.4, we observed that older accounting professionals more frequently indicated the perception of required high (excessive) availability by their employers (
Table 8 Part 8.2, χ2 Yates correction = 14.31,
p = 0.000).
Contrary to our expectations, older respondents did not indicate more frequent appreciation as employees in the company compared to younger respondents (
Table 8 Part 8.3, χ2 Yates correction = 0.54,
p = 0.464).
Table 9 shows the link between the gender of accounting staff members and the quality of professional performance in respect of age.
Table 8 shows that older respondents more frequently indicated that there was a link between gender and quality of performing the accounting profession; however, the majority of respondents perceived no link between gender and quality of performing the accounting profession.