Next Article in Journal
Robust Linear Programming and Its Application to Water and Environmental Decision-Making under Uncertainty
Previous Article in Journal
Conserving Biocultural Diversity through Community–Government Interaction: A Practice-Based Approach in a Brazilian Extractive Reserve
Article

Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case

Unit for Human Geography, Department of Economy and Society, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 40530, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010031
Received: 22 November 2018 / Revised: 12 December 2018 / Accepted: 12 December 2018 / Published: 21 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Transportation)
In striving for sustainability, urban policy and planning increasingly emphasize proximity ideals in order to go beyond established mobility- and speed-oriented accessibility strategies. Yet proximity is a fluid concept with many contextualized meanings, cutting across most sectors of urban planning. When proximity is realized in actual planning, clarity and communicability are therefore required. Here we explored how urban planners in different fields of expertise understand and apply the proximity concept. Furthermore, we tested a collaborative tool enabling transparent discussion and fostering a joint basis for further application. Qualitative data were collected via six semi-structured, focus-group workshops with 35 planners of various competencies working in three western Swedish municipalities. The results indicated that planning goals of proximity were negotiated according to three understandings: One derived from the established understanding of transportation and land-use integration, relying on planners’ expert views; a second emphasizing the local community understanding, highlighting the social context of neighborhoods; and a third comprising the personal environment understanding of the individual’s closest physical space at a detailed scale level. Collaborative exercises resulted in the development of a communicative tool for negotiating perceived understandings of proximity, as well as planning goals. View Full-Text
Keywords: collaborative tool; planning; spatial proximity; sustainable accessibility; understanding; workshop method collaborative tool; planning; spatial proximity; sustainable accessibility; understanding; workshop method
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gil Solá, A.; Vilhelmson, B. Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case. Sustainability 2019, 11, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010031

AMA Style

Gil Solá A, Vilhelmson B. Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case. Sustainability. 2019; 11(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gil Solá, Ana, and Bertil Vilhelmson. 2019. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case" Sustainability 11, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010031

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop