Next Article in Journal
Relevance Analysis on the Variety Characteristics of PM2.5 Concentrations in Beijing, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Uncertainty Analysis for the CH4 Emission Factor of Thermal Power Plant by Monte Carlo Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Land Use and Rural Development in the National Scheme of Village Relocation and Urbanization in China: A Case Study of Two Villages in Jiangsu Province
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feasibility of Eco-Friendly Binary and Ternary Blended Binders Made of Fly-Ash and Oil-Refinery Spent Catalyst in Ready-Mixed Concrete Production
Article

Hybrid Input-Output Analysis of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost Differences between New-Build and Refurbished Projects

1
Faculty of Society & Design, Bond University, Robina QLD 4226, Australia
2
Building and Real Estate Department, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(9), 3229; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093229
Received: 10 August 2018 / Revised: 4 September 2018 / Accepted: 4 September 2018 / Published: 10 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circular Economy—Sustainable Energy and Waste Policies)
Refurbishing buildings helps reduce waste, and limiting the amount of embodied carbon in buildings helps minimize the damaging impacts of climate change through lower CO2 emissions. The analysis of embodied carbon is based on the concept of life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA is a systematic tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of a product, technology, or service through all stages of its life cycle. This study investigates the embodied carbon footprint of both new-build and refurbished buildings to determine the embodied carbon profile and its relationship to both embodied energy and construction cost. It recognizes that changes in the fuel mix for electricity generation play an important role in embodied carbon impacts in different countries. The empirical findings for Hong Kong suggest that mean embodied carbon for refurbished buildings is 33–39% lower than new-build projects, and the cost for refurbished buildings is 22–50% lower than new-build projects (per square meter of floor area). Embodied carbon ranges from 645–1059 kgCO2e/m2 for new-build and 294–655 kgCO2e/m2 for refurbished projects, which is in keeping with other studies outside Hong Kong. However, values of embodied carbon and cost for refurbished projects in this study have a higher coefficient of variation than their new-build counterparts. It is argued that it is preferable to estimate embodied energy and then convert to embodied carbon (rather than estimate embodied carbon directly), as carbon is both time and location specific. A very strong linear relationship is also observed between embodied energy and construction cost that can be used to predict the former, given the latter. This study provides a framework whereby comparisons can be made between new-build and refurbished projects on the basis of embodied carbon and related construction cost differentials into the future, helping to make informed decisions about which strategy to pursue. View Full-Text
Keywords: embodied energy; carbon price; construction cost; energy-cost correlation; Hong Kong embodied energy; carbon price; construction cost; energy-cost correlation; Hong Kong
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Langston, C.; Chan, E.H.W.; Yung, E.H.K. Hybrid Input-Output Analysis of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost Differences between New-Build and Refurbished Projects. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093229

AMA Style

Langston C, Chan EHW, Yung EHK. Hybrid Input-Output Analysis of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost Differences between New-Build and Refurbished Projects. Sustainability. 2018; 10(9):3229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Langston, Craig, Edwin H.W. Chan, and Esther H.K. Yung. 2018. "Hybrid Input-Output Analysis of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost Differences between New-Build and Refurbished Projects" Sustainability 10, no. 9: 3229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093229

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop