Next Article in Journal
Does the Complexity of Evapotranspiration and Hydrological Models Enhance Robustness?
Next Article in Special Issue
The Energy and Carbon Footprint of the Global ICT and E&M Sectors 2010–2015
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Insulation Type and Thickness on the Dynamic Thermal Characteristics of an External Wall Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Digital Acceleration of Sustainability Transition: The Paradox of Push Impacts
Open AccessArticle

Indicators for Promising Accessibility and Mobility Services

Strategic Sustainability Studies, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
Integrated Product Development, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(8), 2836;
Received: 21 June 2018 / Revised: 24 July 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 9 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) for Sustainability)
Cities are increasingly facing major transportation challenges, and new sustainable solutions are needed. New ICT-enabled services can be part of solving the problems, including both improving and finding new transportation services and providing digital access to different services. It is important to identify which services have the best potential for environmental benefits (e.g., travel reduction leading to lesser emissions), economic viability and spread. Such identification can be carried out with the help of indicators. This article uses four types of new accessibility services to test out a previously formulated set of indicators and suggest changes to make them more useful. Using common indicators for transportation and digital accessibility services seem to support collecting and condensing information about the services and simplifies understanding their benefits and challenges. However, a challenge for this approach is finding indicators that are both specific and broad enough to be useful. View Full-Text
Keywords: ICT; digitalization; societal change; sustainability; indicators ICT; digitalization; societal change; sustainability; indicators
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ringenson, T.; Arnfalk, P.; Kramers, A.; Sopjani, L. Indicators for Promising Accessibility and Mobility Services. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2836.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop