Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Capability of the Firm as Driver of Green Supply Chain Management Implementation
Previous Article in Journal
What Will Make Energy Systems Sustainable?

How to Avoid Pigeonholing the Environmental Manager?

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland//HES-SO, HEIG-VD, Av. des Sports 20, CH-1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
EA ECCO, Chemin de Vignes d’Argent 7, CH-1004 Lausanne, Switzerland
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(7), 2538;
Received: 15 June 2018 / Revised: 12 July 2018 / Accepted: 16 July 2018 / Published: 19 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
The research investigates the role the environmental manager plays to ensure a successful (or not) implementation of environmental performance within an organization. It is based on interviews of 5–7 actors per company within a sample of 7 companies (42 interviews). We build upon bias of perception of the various actors interviewed within each company to define 4 paradoxes related to the roles and mission of the environmental manager that hinder proper efficiency of environmental management at company level. Paradox 1 is that no one takes ownership of environmental performance within the organization. Paradox 2 is that the environmental manager is in an awkward situation vis-à-vis his boss. Paradox 3 is that the role of the environmental manager in relation to employees is ambiguous. Paradox 4 is that corporate and product approaches are decoupled. We suggest that these paradoxes interact and form a vicious cycle that may, in part, be responsible for the environmental decoupling phenomenon—companies often adopt a sustainability policy symbolically without implementing it substantively. Our research suggests that, by leveraging the leadership of the environmental manager through organizational and motivational measures, the vicious cycle can be transformed into a virtuous cycle and the human motivation can become a driver for green change within corporations. We proposed the SEA (Shaping Environmental Action) model based of 4 pillars: information, motivation, organization, and strategy. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecodesign; environmental decoupling; environmental management; maturity model; paradox theory ecodesign; environmental decoupling; environmental management; maturity model; paradox theory
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Boucher, J.; Jenny, C.; Plummer, Z.; Schneider, G. How to Avoid Pigeonholing the Environmental Manager? Sustainability 2018, 10, 2538.

AMA Style

Boucher J, Jenny C, Plummer Z, Schneider G. How to Avoid Pigeonholing the Environmental Manager? Sustainability. 2018; 10(7):2538.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boucher, Julien, Clotilde Jenny, Zara Plummer, and Gerhard Schneider. 2018. "How to Avoid Pigeonholing the Environmental Manager?" Sustainability 10, no. 7: 2538.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop