Next Article in Journal
A Methodology for an Integrated Approach for Seismic and Energy Refurbishment of Historic Buildings in Mediterranean Area
Next Article in Special Issue
Arable Land Tenancy and Soil Quality in Germany: Contesting Theory with Empirics
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Operating Parameters on the Performance Evaluation of Benthic Microbial Fuel Cells Using Sediments from the Bay of Campeche, Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Title “Organic Fertilizers” in Vietnam’s Markets: Nutrient Composition and Efficacy of Their Application
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(7), 2447;

Institutional Economics of Agricultural Soil Ecosystem Services

UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Economics, 04138 Leipzig, Germany
UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Environmental and Planning Law, 04138 Leipzig, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 June 2018 / Revised: 4 July 2018 / Accepted: 11 July 2018 / Published: 13 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Governance of Sustainable Soil Management)
Full-Text   |   PDF [9107 KB, uploaded 13 July 2018]   |  


Who owns the soils? What seems to be a straightforward legal issue actually opens up a debate about the ecosystem services that can be derived from soils and the distribution of benefits and responsibilities for sustaining functioning and healthy soils. In particular, agricultural land use may be constrained by a lack of properly defined property rights. Using the new institutional economics perspective, we show that multifunctionality of soils and an attribute-based property rights perspective substantiate the intuition that land property implies special obligations towards the common good. The concept of ecosystem services can illustrate the variety of beneficiaries of multifaceted soil ecosystem services. This allows identification of reasons for unsustainable soil management that result from imperfections in the definition of property rights. We suggest implications for improved governance of agricultural soils using two case studies in the EU context: the EU Common Agricultural Policy and the use of planning instruments to steer agricultural soil use in Germany. Thus, we contribute to achieving the societal goals of more sustainable land use by detecting causes of shortcomings in current land regulation and by suggesting governance approaches to support a more sustainable management of agricultural soils. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecosystem services; governance; institutions; land; property rights; soils; sustainability ecosystem services; governance; institutions; land; property rights; soils; sustainability

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bartkowski, B.; Hansjürgens, B.; Möckel, S.; Bartke, S. Institutional Economics of Agricultural Soil Ecosystem Services. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2447.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top