Next Article in Journal
Research on the Enhancement Effects of Using Ecological Principles in Managing the Lifecycle of Industrial Land
Next Article in Special Issue
Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices
Previous Article in Journal
Why Do People Consume and Provide Sharing Economy Accommodation?—A Sustainability Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(6), 2074; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062074

The Creation of an Ecovillage: Handling Identities in a Norwegian Sustainable Valley

1
CICERO Center for International Climate Research, P.O. Box. 1129 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
2
Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, P.O. Box. 1116 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 April 2018 / Revised: 9 June 2018 / Accepted: 15 June 2018 / Published: 19 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1802 KB, uploaded 19 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative study of Hurdal Ecovillage in Norway. It explores how the actors involved have interacted over time and contributed to shaping the ecovillage. The study demonstrates that the ecovillage as a concept is continuously refined both internally on an individual level and in the village, and in mainstream society. At stake is the question of ecovillage identity and what this should entail. The interviewed ecovillagers report two main motives for deciding to move to the village. One is to become part of the ecovillage community, while the other is grounded in the ecovillage as a means to achieve sustainability rather than as a goal in itself. Hurdal Ecovillage has undergone two distinct development phases. First, the members jointly owned the land, built their own houses, and attempted to be self-sufficient. The ecovillage was largely isolated from the local community. In the second phase, professional actors took over responsibility for developing the village, offering ready-made houses to be owned by individual families. This shift resulted in the ecovillage appearing more like conventional settlements. Today’s ecovillagers express a wish to constitute an attractive, sustainable alternative to conventional living, but to do so they have to maintain a distance between themselves and the wider community. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecovillage; sustainability; collective identity; mainstreaming; distance ecovillage; sustainability; collective identity; mainstreaming; distance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Westskog, H.; Winther, T.; Aasen, M. The Creation of an Ecovillage: Handling Identities in a Norwegian Sustainable Valley. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2074.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top