Next Article in Journal
Measurements of Pedestrian Friendliness of Residential Area: A Case Study in Hexi District of Nanjing
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Practices on Cotton Production and Livelihood of Farmers in Punjab, Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Willingness to Comply with Corporate Law: An Interdisciplinary Teaching Method in Higher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
What You Sow Is What You Reap? (Dis-)Incentives for Adaptation Intentions in Farming
Open AccessReview

Institutional Perspectives of Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review

1
Ecole de Foresterie et d’Ingénierie du Bois, Université Nationale d’Agriculture du Benin, Kétou BP 43, Benin
2
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Bamako BP 320, Mali
3
Institute for Environment and Sanitation Studies, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 209, Legon, Accra, Ghana
4
Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou 01 BP 526, Benin
5
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), P.O. Box 1269, Kigali, Rwanda
6
Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands
7
CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), ICRISAT, Bamako BP 320, Mali
8
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
9
CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(6), 1990; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061990
Received: 22 May 2018 / Revised: 6 June 2018 / Accepted: 8 June 2018 / Published: 13 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Governance for Climate Smart Agriculture)
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly seen as a promising approach to feed the growing world population under climate change. The review explored how institutional perspectives are reflected in the CSA literature. In total, 137 publications were analyzed using institutional analysis framework, of which 55.5% make specific reference to institutional dimensions. While the CSA concept encompasses three pillars (productivity, adaptation, and mitigation), the literature has hardly addressed them in an integrated way. The development status of study sites also seems to influence which pillars are promoted. Mitigation was predominantly addressed in high-income countries, while productivity and adaptation were priorities for middle and low-income countries. Interest in institutional aspects has been gradual in the CSA literature. It has largely focused on knowledge infrastructure, market structure, and hard institutional aspects. There has been less attention to understand whether investments in physical infrastructure and actors’ interaction, or how historical, political, and social context may influence the uptake of CSA options. Rethinking the approach to promoting CSA technologies by integrating technology packages and institutional enabling factors can provide potential opportunities for effective scaling of CSA options. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate-smart agriculture; institutions; adaptation; mitigation; systematic review climate-smart agriculture; institutions; adaptation; mitigation; systematic review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Totin, E.; Segnon, A.C.; Schut, M.; Affognon, H.; Zougmoré, R.B.; Rosenstock, T.; Thornton, P.K. Institutional Perspectives of Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1990.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop