Next Article in Journal
Study on Application Potential of Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage-Hybrid Ground Source Heat Pump in Taiwan—Taking Experiments in Tainan as Examples
Next Article in Special Issue
Gaps and Research Demand for Sustainability Certification and Standardisation in a Sustainable Bio-Based Economy in the EU
Previous Article in Journal
A Smartphone Application for Personalized and Multi-Method Interventions toward Energy Saving in Buildings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to the Total Economy: A Review of National Frameworks
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(6), 1745;

Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Economics of Agriculture Unit, Edificio EXPO, C/ Inca Garcilaso 3, 41092 Seville, Spain
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 April 2018 / Revised: 18 May 2018 / Accepted: 22 May 2018 / Published: 26 May 2018
PDF [2127 KB, uploaded 26 May 2018]


The monitoring of the European bioeconomy is hampered by a lack of statistics on emergent and partially bio-based sectors. In this study, we complete the picture of the bioeconomy in the European Union (EU) by first estimating a set of socioeconomic indicators in missing sectors. Second, we identify four broad bioeconomy patterns within the EU that differ according to the specialisation of Member States’ labour markets in the bioeconomy (location quotient) and according to the apparent labour productivity of their bioeconomies. The patterns are geographically distributed in (i) Eastern Member States and Greece and Portugal; (ii) Central and Baltic Member States; (iii) Western Member States; and (iv) Northern Member States. They are strongly related to the level of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Member States, and to their political histories (e.g., their year of accession to the EU, and the existence and maturity of their bioeconomy strategies). Within each group, diversity exists in terms of sectoral bioeconomy development. Third, we examine temporal dynamics over the period 2008–2015, stressing with the cases of Slovenia, Portugal, Greece and Finland that a transition from one group to another is possible. Finally, we take a closer look at the East–West bioeconomy disparities within Europe and suggest measures to promote EU bioeconomies. View Full-Text
Keywords: bioeconomy; EU Member States; apparent labour productivity; jobs and growth; typology bioeconomy; EU Member States; apparent labour productivity; jobs and growth; typology

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ronzon, T.; M’Barek, R. Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1745.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top