Next Article in Journal
Resilience of Agricultural Value Chains in Developing Country Contexts: A Framework and Assessment Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Towards More Effective Water Quality Governance: A Review of Social-Economic, Legal and Ecological Perspectives and Their Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Crews, T.E.; Rumsey, B.E. What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 578

by
Timothy E. Crews
1,* and
Brian E. Rumsey
2
1
The Land Institute, 2440 E. Water Well Rd., Salina, KS 67401, USA
2
Environmental History, University of Kansas, 3650 Wescoe Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 915; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040915
Submission received: 19 March 2018 / Revised: 19 March 2018 / Accepted: 20 March 2018 / Published: 22 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Issues on Soil Management and Conservation)
The authors would like to correct the reference numbers listed in Table 2 of their paper [1]. The reference numbers which need to be corrected are underlined in the original version of Table 2. The original Table 2 reads as follows:
The corrected Table 2 reads as follows:

Reference

  1. Crews, T.E.; Rumsey, B.E. What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 2. Summary of field-based estimations of soil carbon accumulation rates in the conversion of annual agriculture to perennial grassland or perennial bioenergy crops.
Table 2. Summary of field-based estimations of soil carbon accumulation rates in the conversion of annual agriculture to perennial grassland or perennial bioenergy crops.
Study TypeGeographic AreasMean C Accumulation
t ha−1 year−1
Depths 1 Sampled (cm)No. Studies or Sites IncludedReference
Annual crops to perennial pasture or restored native grassland
Meta-analysisCentral Europe, N. America, Russia0.720–30273[93]
Meta-analysisRussia0.962045[95]
Meta-analysisTropical to temperate0.335–30039[96]
Meta-analysisAmericas, U.K., Australia1.01NR 223[97]
ReviewN. Midwest USA0.44–0.52539[98]
ReviewW. Canada0.59NR17[99]
ChronosequencesIllinois, USA0.4310016[100]
ReviewFrance0.50NR-[101]
ReviewNR0.3–1.0NR-[102]
Annual crops to perennial bioenergy crops
Meta-analysisNR1.14–1.880–15023[103]
Meta-analysisN. & S. America, Europe
MiscanthusS. Africa, Asia1.0910013[89]
Switchgrass 1.2810040[89]
1 When a range is reported, it indicates that multiple soil depths falling within the range were included in the study; 2 NR = not reported.
Table 2. Summary of field-based estimations of soil carbon accumulation rates in the conversion of annual agriculture to perennial grassland or perennial bioenergy crops.
Table 2. Summary of field-based estimations of soil carbon accumulation rates in the conversion of annual agriculture to perennial grassland or perennial bioenergy crops.
Study TypeGeographic AreasMean C Accumulation
t ha−1 year−1
Depths 1 Sampled (cm)No. Studies or Sites IncludedReference
Annual crops to perennial pasture or restored native grassland
Meta-analysisCentral Europe, N. America, Russia0.720–30273[89]
Meta-analysisRussia0.962045[90]
Meta-analysisTropical to temperate0.335–30039[91]
Meta-analysisAmericas, U.K., Australia1.01NR 223[92]
ReviewN. Midwest USA0.44–0.52539[93]
ReviewW. Canada0.59NR17[94]
ChronosequencesIllinois, USA0.4310016[95]
ReviewFrance0.50NR-[96]
ReviewNR0.3–1.0NR-[97]
Annual crops to perennial bioenergy crops
Meta-analysisNR1.14–1.880–15023[98]
Meta-analysisN. & S. America, Europe
MiscanthusS. Africa, Asia1.0910013[99]
Switchgrass 1.2810040[99]
1 When a range is reported, it indicates that multiple soil depths falling within the range were included in the study; 2 NR = not reported.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crews, T.E.; Rumsey, B.E. Erratum: Crews, T.E.; Rumsey, B.E. What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 578. Sustainability 2018, 10, 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040915

AMA Style

Crews TE, Rumsey BE. Erratum: Crews, T.E.; Rumsey, B.E. What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 578. Sustainability. 2018; 10(4):915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040915

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crews, Timothy E., and Brian E. Rumsey. 2018. "Erratum: Crews, T.E.; Rumsey, B.E. What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 578" Sustainability 10, no. 4: 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040915

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop