Next Article in Journal
Development of the Concept of Agroecology in Europe: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Measuring Country Sustainability Performance Using Ensembles of Neuro-Fuzzy Technique
Previous Article in Journal
The Spanish Turn against Renewable Energy Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Carbon Scenarios for Europe: An Evaluation of Upscaling Low Carbon Experiments
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 1209; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041209

Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies

1
Management Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Mobile Station, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China
2
School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 March 2018 / Revised: 8 April 2018 / Accepted: 12 April 2018 / Published: 17 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [1806 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

This paper considers the impact of consumer environmental awareness (CEA), retailer’s fairness concern, and government subsidies on the two echelon supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer. The manufacturer produces green products with carbon emission reduction. The government provides two types of alternative subsidies: a fixed subsidy (referred to as an F-type subsidy) or a discount subsidy (referred to as a D-type subsidy) to encourage the manufacturer to produce a product with a high carbon emission reduction rate. We aim to provide optimal solutions to the manufacturer and the retailer with regard to the retailer’s fairness concern and government subsidies; thus we discuss four decision scenarios: the benchmark model without the fairness concern and subsidy, the model with the retailer’s fairness concern, the model with fairness concern and the F-type subsidy, and the model with fairness concern and the D-type subsidy. We provide explicit solutions and numerical examples of the optimal carbon emission reduction rate, wholesale price, and retail price. Our study has four main findings: firstly, high consumer environmental awareness will benefit both the manufacturer and the retailer in the above four scenarios; secondly, the fairness concern and subsidy have a counter effect on the optimal strategies (the subsidy could alleviate the negative influence caused by retailer’s fairness concern); thirdly, the government could subsidize the retailer when there is unfairness in the supply chain so that the manufacturer could produce a product with lower carbon emission; finally, using the subsidy related to the environmental quality will be more helpful for improving environment quality, especially when the government has a budget constraint. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon emission reduction rate; fairness concern; consumer environmental awareness; government subsidy carbon emission reduction rate; fairness concern; consumer environmental awareness; government subsidy
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Xue, B.; Liu, X. Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1209.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top