Next Article in Journal
Development of the Concept of Agroecology in Europe: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Measuring Country Sustainability Performance Using Ensembles of Neuro-Fuzzy Technique
Previous Article in Journal
The Spanish Turn against Renewable Energy Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Carbon Scenarios for Europe: An Evaluation of Upscaling Low Carbon Experiments
Open AccessArticle

Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies

1
Management Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Mobile Station, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China
2
School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 1209; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041209
Received: 19 March 2018 / Revised: 8 April 2018 / Accepted: 12 April 2018 / Published: 17 April 2018
This paper considers the impact of consumer environmental awareness (CEA), retailer’s fairness concern, and government subsidies on the two echelon supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer. The manufacturer produces green products with carbon emission reduction. The government provides two types of alternative subsidies: a fixed subsidy (referred to as an F-type subsidy) or a discount subsidy (referred to as a D-type subsidy) to encourage the manufacturer to produce a product with a high carbon emission reduction rate. We aim to provide optimal solutions to the manufacturer and the retailer with regard to the retailer’s fairness concern and government subsidies; thus we discuss four decision scenarios: the benchmark model without the fairness concern and subsidy, the model with the retailer’s fairness concern, the model with fairness concern and the F-type subsidy, and the model with fairness concern and the D-type subsidy. We provide explicit solutions and numerical examples of the optimal carbon emission reduction rate, wholesale price, and retail price. Our study has four main findings: firstly, high consumer environmental awareness will benefit both the manufacturer and the retailer in the above four scenarios; secondly, the fairness concern and subsidy have a counter effect on the optimal strategies (the subsidy could alleviate the negative influence caused by retailer’s fairness concern); thirdly, the government could subsidize the retailer when there is unfairness in the supply chain so that the manufacturer could produce a product with lower carbon emission; finally, using the subsidy related to the environmental quality will be more helpful for improving environment quality, especially when the government has a budget constraint. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon emission reduction rate; fairness concern; consumer environmental awareness; government subsidy carbon emission reduction rate; fairness concern; consumer environmental awareness; government subsidy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Xue, B.; Liu, X. Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041209

AMA Style

Zhang L, Xue B, Liu X. Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies. Sustainability. 2018; 10(4):1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Linghong; Xue, Bowen; Liu, Xiyu. 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies" Sustainability 10, no. 4: 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041209

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop