Next Article in Journal
Efficiency of Different Integrated Agriculture Aquaculture Systems in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Analysis of the Behavior of an IPM Bridge According to Super-Structure and Sub-Structure Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Maintenance of a High-Voltage Overhead Transmission Line: Sustainability and Noise Impact Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Pedestrian Comfort with Wind Chill during Winter
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of LEED for Neighbourhood Development and Envision Rating Frameworks for Their Implementation in Poorer Countries

GITECO Research Group, Universidad de Cantabria, Avd. de los Castros 44, 39005 Santander, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(2), 492; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020492
Received: 12 January 2018 / Revised: 6 February 2018 / Accepted: 12 February 2018 / Published: 12 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Built Environment)
The unstoppable world population growth is increasing the concentration of people in urban settlements and the number of megacities, especially in developing countries where urbanization exacerbates social and economic inequalities. Green rating systems have been launched during the last decades to facilitate the assessment of sustainable development in terms of building and infrastructure, including the evaluation of sustainable urban development through the study of communities. This article assesses two of the most renowned sustainable rating systems through the prism of economy, environment and society and the international actions undertaken toward the promotion of sustainable development worldwide, in order to determine their effectiveness to assess urban development in poorer nations. Hence, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Neighbourhood Development (LEED ND) and Envision, both from the United States, were chosen as representatives of building and infrastructure fields, respectively, so that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the New Urban Agenda (Habitat III) were the benchmarks selected to define the sustainability aspects required to evaluate their potential application in less developed countries. The absence of metrics in the New Urban Agenda led to relate its commitments to the SDGs, which revealed that the prerequisites and credits included in LEED ND and Envision mainly focused on managerial and environmental aspects and disregarded the economic and social dimensions. Consequently, the premises under which LEED ND and Envision were developed must be updated and complemented with the two latest guidelines recently adopted by the United Nations in the field of urban and sustainable development. View Full-Text
Keywords: Envision; Habitat III; LEED ND; sustainable rating system; sustainable urban development; SDGs Envision; Habitat III; LEED ND; sustainable rating system; sustainable urban development; SDGs
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Diaz-Sarachaga, J.M.; Jato-Espino, D.; Castro-Fresno, D. Evaluation of LEED for Neighbourhood Development and Envision Rating Frameworks for Their Implementation in Poorer Countries. Sustainability 2018, 10, 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020492

AMA Style

Diaz-Sarachaga JM, Jato-Espino D, Castro-Fresno D. Evaluation of LEED for Neighbourhood Development and Envision Rating Frameworks for Their Implementation in Poorer Countries. Sustainability. 2018; 10(2):492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose M.; Jato-Espino, Daniel; Castro-Fresno, Daniel. 2018. "Evaluation of LEED for Neighbourhood Development and Envision Rating Frameworks for Their Implementation in Poorer Countries" Sustainability 10, no. 2: 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020492

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop