Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
AbstractTo displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a completely decarbonized, energy-rich and sustainable future could be achieved with a dominant deployment of next-generation nuclear fission and associated technologies for synthesizing liquid fuels and recycling waste. By contrast, non-dispatchable energy sources like wind and solar energy are arguably superfluous, other than for niche applications, and run the risk of diverting resources away from viable and holistic solutions. For instance, the pairing of variable renewables with natural-gas backup fails to address many of the entrenched problems we seek to solve. Our conclusion is that, given the urgent time frame and massive extent of the energy-replacement challenge, half-measures that distract from or stymie effective policy and infrastructure investment should be avoided. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 168 KB)
Share & Cite This Article
Brook, B.W.; Blees, T.; Wigley, T.M.L.; Hong, S. Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? Sustainability 2018, 10, 302.
Brook BW, Blees T, Wigley TML, Hong S. Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? Sustainability. 2018; 10(2):302.Chicago/Turabian Style
Brook, Barry W.; Blees, Tom; Wigley, Tom M.L.; Hong, Sanghyun. 2018. "Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?" Sustainability 10, no. 2: 302.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.