Next Article in Journal
A Sustainability Lighthouse—Supporting Transition Leadership and Conversations on Desirable Futures
Previous Article in Journal
Recent History, Types, and Future of Modern Caisson Technology: The Way to More Sustainable Practices
Article

Does the Impact of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Reverse Green Technology Process Differ across Countries?

by * and *
School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 3841; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113841
Received: 19 September 2018 / Revised: 14 October 2018 / Accepted: 18 October 2018 / Published: 23 October 2018
The reverse technology spillover effect of Outward Foreign Direct Investment (OFDI) has been widely discussed. In the context of pursuing green growth, a few scholars began to study the impact of OFDI on home country green technological progress or green total factor productivity. However, few of these papers have made a thorough analysis of how OFDI affects the home country’s green technological progress, and have not considered the impact of different types of OFDI on green technological progress. This paper extends the basic analysis framework of technological progress to green technological progress, and discusses for the first time the ways for China to invest in developed and developing countries to achieve green technological progress. Specifically, this paper combines the global Malmquist productivity concept with the directional distance function to construct the global Malmquist Luenberger (GML) index to describe green technological progress of China’s provinces, and uses panel data model from 2003 to 2016 to study the impact of China’s investment in different types of countries. The results show that: (1) China’s investment in developed countries can bring reverse green technology spillovers and promote China’s green technology progress. But this is also affected by China’s domestic human capital stock, the increase in human capital stock is conducive to the absorption of green technology. (2) OFDI flows to transition or developing countries have failed to bring about green technological progress, but domestic R&D capital stock can produce a control response. (3) Environmental regulation, import trade and domestic R&D capital stock can bring positive effects on green technology progress, while foreign direct investment, fiscal decentralization and economic growth hinder green technology progress. (4) There is regional heterogeneity in the impact of OFDI with different directions on green technological progress. Because of environmental regulation and economic development, the eastern region of China is easier to obtain reverse green technology progress than the central and western regions in the process of OFDI. View Full-Text
Keywords: OFDI; green technology progress; environmental regulation; GML OFDI; green technology progress; environmental regulation; GML
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, S.; Ye, A. Does the Impact of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Reverse Green Technology Process Differ across Countries? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113841

AMA Style

Zhu S, Ye A. Does the Impact of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Reverse Green Technology Process Differ across Countries? Sustainability. 2018; 10(11):3841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Songping, and Azhong Ye. 2018. "Does the Impact of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Reverse Green Technology Process Differ across Countries?" Sustainability 10, no. 11: 3841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113841

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop