Next Article in Journal
Variation Trend Analysis of Runoff and Sediment Time Series Based on the R/S Analysis of Simulated Loess Tilled Slopes in the Loess Plateau, China
Previous Article in Journal
A Resource Sharing Mechanism for Sustainable Production in the Garment Industry
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Sustainability 2018, 10(1), 53;

Review of Soil Organic Carbon Measurement Protocols: A US and Brazil Comparison and Recommendation

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA Agrobiologia), Seropédica 23891-000, RJ, Brazil
National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (NLAE), Ames, IA 50011, USA
Interdisciplinary Center of Energy Planning (NIPE)/Unicamp, Barão Geraldo, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
Environmental Assistance Office (EAO), University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28273, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 August 2017 / Revised: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 20 December 2017 / Published: 26 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1114 KB, uploaded 29 December 2017]   |  


Soil organic carbon (SOC) change influences the life-cycle assessment (LCA) calculations for globally traded bio-based products. Broad agreement on the importance of SOC measurement stands in contrast with inconsistent measurement methods. This paper focuses on published SOC research on lands managed for maize (Zea mays L.) in the U.S. and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in Brazil. A literature review found that reported SOC measurement protocols reflect different sampling strategies, measurement techniques, and laboratory analysis methods. Variability in sampling techniques (pits versus core samples), depths, increments for analysis, and analytical procedures (wet oxidation versus dry combustion) can influence reported SOC values. To improve consistency and comparability in future SOC studies, the authors recommend that: (a) the methods applied for each step in SOC studies be documented; (b) a defined protocol for soil pits or coring be applied; (c) samples be analyzed at 10 cm intervals for the full rooting depth and at 20 cm intervals below rooting until reaching 100 cm; (d) stratified sampling schemes be applied where possible to reflect variability across study sites; (e) standard laboratory techniques be used to differentiate among labile and stable SOC fractions; and (f) more long-term, diachronic approaches be used to assess SOC change. We conclude with suggestions for future research to further improve the comparability of SOC measurements across sites and nations. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon sequestration; soil sampling; bioenergy; ethanol; sugarcane; maize carbon sequestration; soil sampling; bioenergy; ethanol; sugarcane; maize

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Davis, M.R.; Alves, B.J.R.; Karlen, D.L.; Kline, K.L.; Galdos, M.; Abulebdeh, D. Review of Soil Organic Carbon Measurement Protocols: A US and Brazil Comparison and Recommendation. Sustainability 2018, 10, 53.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top