Next Article in Journal
Overcoming the Barriers to the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Italian LGOs: Better Stick or Carrot?
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Sustainability through a Dual Audit System
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(1), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010133

An Empirical Study on Design Partner Selection in Green Product Collaboration Design

1
Department of Management Engineering, School of Economics & Management, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, Shaanxi, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
3
Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong, China
4
Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
5
Tianhua College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 201815, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 November 2017 / Revised: 30 December 2017 / Accepted: 3 January 2018 / Published: 8 January 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [708 KB, uploaded 8 January 2018]   |  

Abstract

Green production has become an important issue in PCD (Product Collaboration Design) for almost every enterprise, and will determine the sustainability of enterprises in the long term. The choice of design partner is a necessary condition in order to achieve green production. For the uncertain, fuzzy, and dynamic information such as unknown indices and weights, fuzzy semantics, and dynamic time factors in GPCD (Green Product Collaboration Design), a two-stage dynamic hybrid MADM (Multi-Attribute Decision Making) approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL (Decision-Making and Trial Evaluation Laboratory), fuzzy KMA (Karnik–Mendel Algorithm), and fuzzy VIKOR (VlseKriterjumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) was proposed. In the first stage, fuzzy DEMATEL was used to determine the evaluation indices. Then, in the second stage, to accurately depict the dynamic information generated by the different phases of a product design, the dynamic evaluation method based on fuzzy theories was employed, and the weights of the indices were calculated by fuzzy KMA, then sorted by fuzzy VIKOR. Finally, a case study and a comparative analysis wre provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: design partner selection; green product; fuzzy DEMATEL; fuzzy KMA; fuzzy VIKOR; dynamic hybrid MADM; sustainability; sustainable operation design partner selection; green product; fuzzy DEMATEL; fuzzy KMA; fuzzy VIKOR; dynamic hybrid MADM; sustainability; sustainable operation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, A.; Liu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Tsai, S.-B.; Lu, H. An Empirical Study on Design Partner Selection in Green Product Collaboration Design. Sustainability 2018, 10, 133.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top