2. Case Report
A 44-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 1, live 1), without specific comorbidities, was referred to the Emergency Department at a primary care facility for sudden onset vaginal bleeding, associated with pain of moderate intensity in the lower part of the abdomen. Her last menstrual period occurred two weeks before her presentation, and previous menstrual cycles were regular. She did not smoke or drink alcohol. The patient was otherwise fit and well, with no other significant medical history. She had no significant family history and she is married, with a 12-year-old daughter. The delivery was vaginal, uncomplicated, term pregnancy, without any known difficulties. Also, the patient denied intermenstrual bleeding, post-coital bleeding and recent changes in menstrual cycle.
The general condition of the patient appeared to be good. Bimanual examination revealed an anteverted uterus increased in size, firm consistency, painless. There were no masses palpated in the vaginal canal or adnexa. Abdominal-pelvic ultrasound showed an endometrial thickness of 8 mm and multiple hypoechoic intramural masses of different sizes. As the cause of bleeding could not be determined from any coagulation disorder or a scar site, a diagnostic and hemostatic uterine curettage was performed and histology showed poorly differentiated pleomorphic leiomyosarcoma.
In April 2020, the patient was submitted to our unit for treatment. After discussion at the oncology multidisciplinary team meeting (MTD), a second pathological opinion was requested.
Preoperative investigations and surgical treatment
Microscopic re-evaluation of slides in the biopsy curettage product was completed with the immunohistochemical examination that established the diagnosis of ETT.
Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium showed the presence of a large uterus measuring 51 (longitudinal) × 79 (max anteroposterior) × 91 mm (transverse), with inhomogeneous structure due to a fundic tumor mass measuring 23 × 32 mm with moderate hypo signal T1, with 2/3 myometrial invasion. The right ovary had multiple peripheral cysts measuring 17 × 12 mm (Figure 1
For the systemic evaluation of the patient, a thoraco-abdominal CT-scan was performed which showed the absence of lesions suspected of secondary determinations.
The images and tumor results had been reviewed at the oncology MTD, and the recommendation was surgical treatment.
Laboratory tests showed mild neutrophilic leukocytosis (leukocytes—10,100 mm3, neutrophils—8160 mm3) and normal β-HCG (<2 ng/mL), α-fetoprotein (AFP) and CA125 levels (18.4 UI/mL).
After preoperative preparation was done, radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (level I and II) was performed (Figure 2
). The procedure was uncomplicated. The patient has had a good recovery after surgery and she was discharged on day 5 postoperatively.
Anatomopathological evaluation of the surgical specimen
The macroscopic evaluation showed the uterus with irregular contour. The uterine cavity is 4 cm long. At the level of the uterine fundus, with extension to the left horn, there were noted a tumor mass of 3.7/2.5/2 cm, well delimited, pearly white, fasciculate appearance and friable consistency. The tumor protrudes in the uterine serosa and infiltrates over 50% of the thickness of the myometrium. In the right hemibody of the uterus, intramural, there were found multiple nodular tumors, the largest being 2.3 cm in diameter, well defined, pearly white, fasciculate appearance and elastic consistency. The right ovary measured 4.2 cm × 5.1 cm × 1.7 cm with unilocular sero-cytrin ovarian cyst measuring 2.2 cm. The left ovary measured 2.9 cm × 2.2 cm × 0.8 cm with two unilocular sero-cytrin ovarian cysts measuring 0.8 cm.
The microscopic evaluation of the surgical specimen showed a uterine nodular tumor with dimensions of 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm × 2 cm developed in the uterine fundus area with extension to the left horn, apparently well delimited both macroscopically and microscopically—pushing type margin.
Intermediate trophoblast tumor cells are arranged in a fibrous eosinophilic material with vesicular nuclei. Tumor cells surround and sometimes completely replace the vascular walls in some medium-sized vascular spaces. Numerous atypical mitoses are identified—19 mitoses/10/high power field. At the level of the uterine serosa, near the tumor formation, an area of its rupture is identified with the exteriorization on the serosa of a small island of tumor cells accompanied by necrosis. The specimen margins were, notably, free of tumor (Figure 3
). All the pelvic lymph nodes are with a preserved structure, without tumor metastases.
staining of the tumor cells revealed SMA was negative in tumor cells, with positive internal control, desmin was negative in tumor cells with positive internal control, CKiT negative in tumor cells and positive in mast cells, CD 10 intense and diffuse positive in tumor cells and p63 weakly positive, zonal extended in tumor cells (Figure 4
). The histology diagnostic was an epithelioid trophoblastic tumor of the uterus, pT1N0M0.
The FIGO prognostic score is 8, with high risk (age = 1, historical-term pregnancy = 2, interval of the previous pregnancy = 4, bHCG level = 0, tumor size = 1, no metastases = 0).
Sixteen months postoperatively, the patient remains disease free according to the paraclinical investigations. She is being monitored monthly with serum β-HCG.
Shih and Kurman first described this pathology in 1998 and named it ETT, distinct from placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT), which is believed to arise exclusively from chorionic-type intermediate trophoblast [2
]. The World Health Organization classified ETTs as a form of GTN in 2003 [3
]. ETT is far less common than PSTT.
The incidence of ETT after a term pregnancy is 1:150,000 pregnancies, with evidence of ethnic variation, representing 1–2% of GTN cases [4
In most of the patients, as in our patient, ETT usually occurs in women of reproductive age, after a full-term delivery. Rarely, it can occur in postmenopausal women. The interval between the ETT and the antecedent pregnancy ranges from several months to many years. Like PSTTs, the antecedent pregnancy like in our case is more often female. The gestational history of our case was represented by full-term delivery. Serum β-HCG levels were almost always raised at the time of diagnosis, Ref. [2
] which is not consistent with our case.
To date, only 8 cases of ETT of the uterus with normal serum β-hCG in a 61-year literature survey (PubMed 1961–2021) have been reported [6
] (Table 1
). Our case is the 9th case in literature, to the best of our knowledge, to present with normal β-hCG levels.
On macroscopic examination, ETT almost always presents itself as a discrete solitary nodule of up to 5 cm, with well-circumscribed border, with solid, tan to brown surface, often with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis located in the fundus (as in our patient), lower uterine segment, endocervix or lung. Rare cases have included pulmonary [14
] and abdominal wall ETTs [15
] without an apparent uterine lesion. From the published material, the survival rate is nearly 100% for non-metastatic cases confined to the uterus, but decreases to 50–60% in patients with metastasis [16
The correct diagnosis can only be made following histological examination and confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The most important and difficult part is to distinguish ETTs from PSTT—which may be challenging due to non-specific clinical and biological features, which frequently suggest an ectopic pregnancy. Useful clinical features in the distinguishing diagnoses PSTT and ETT include: vaginal bleeding in ETTs in comparison with abortion and amenorrhea in cases of PSTT.
The primary diagnosis of our patient was poorly differentiated pleomorphic leiomyosarcoma. In our case, we took the sequential steps in differentiating diagnoses as presented previously. Central histology review by pathologists with GTN’s expertise is crucial to minimize misdiagnosis, because it may be difficult to differentiate PSTT and ETT from each other, and other types of GTN’s.
Microscopically, the tissue from PSTTs have a more infiltrative myoinvasive pattern, an increased sheet-like growth (versus nests and cords), larger cells with more nuclear pleomorphism and multinucleation, prominent and distinctive vascular invasion, strong diffuse staining for hPL and Mel-CAM (CD146), but negative staining for p63 and p40. Extensive or ‘geographic’ necrosis is often present in ETT. Moreover, PSTT is p63 and p40 negative. In consideration to PSTT, indicated above, ETT has shown staining of PD-L1. These results indicate that PD-L1 positive ETTs may gain a benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy [17
Immunohistochemical analysis for our case is summarized in Table 2
, with a comparison between the most important immunohistochemistry panel of PSTT and ETT, according to WHO Classification of Tumours [19
However, reviewing the available literature, a few risk factors generally appear to be associated with favorable or unfavorable outcomes. Time from antecedent pregnancy > 4 years, a high mitotic rate > 6/10 HPF, atypia, vascular invasion, myometrial invasion beyond the inner one-third, stage III or IV, diffuse uterine multifocal disease have been associated with worse outcomes for women with ETT [20
]. The FIGO anatomical stage is a significant prognostic factor for ETT [22
Overall, this case is a stage I disease (p T1N0) with some good prognostic factors, but at least two poor prognosis factors (19 mitoses/10/HPF, antecedent pregnancy > 4 years), which make the prognosis not completely clear (prognostic score = 8). Due to this features, surgery is the most suitable treatment, usually total hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy [23
A series of recent studies [24
] have shown that patients with disease limited to the uterus may be cured by primary hysterectomy without adjuvant chemotherapy. Combined surgery plus chemotherapy are recommended for patients with higher β-hCG levels and metastatic disease [26
The present case underlines the difficulties experienced in diagnosing and treating ETT and highlights the importance of reporting any new cases to add to the understanding of this unusual disease and to achieve a more stable approach for managing these patients.