Next Article in Journal
Relationships Between Genotypes and Phenotypes in Natural Populations of the European Flounder (Platichthys flesus) Under Different Types of Contamination in Estuaries
Previous Article in Journal
Several Pharmaceuticals Impaired Harbor Seal Lymphocytes (Phoca vitulina) In Vitro
 
 
Journal of Xenobiotics is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genotoxic Impact of a Municipal Effluent Dispersion Plume in the Freshwater Mussel Elliptio complanata: An In Situ Study †

1
Emerging Methods Section, Environment Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
2
LEHNA UMR 5023, INRA, USC IGH 1369, Université de Lyon, Vaulx en Velin, France
3
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance Division, Environment Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Conference presentation: part of this paper was presented at the ECOBIM meeting, 2013 May, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
J. Xenobiot. 2013, 3(s1), s1e6; https://doi.org/10.4081/xeno.2013.s1.e6
Submission received: 2 December 2013 / Accepted: 2 December 2013 / Published: 3 December 2013

Introduction

Many surface waters have been reported to be contaminated whereas the most critical sources remain to be identified. The waste-water treatment plant (WWTP) effluents discharged in surface waters are one of the possible sources. Indeed, these effluents often contain well-known contaminants such as heavy metals, pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, hormones and flame retardants [1]. Although wastewaters are treated through different processes, a significant part of these xenobiotics is not eliminated by traditional urban WWTPs, leading to a risk for the aquatic ecosystems receiving these effluents [2]. Given the chemical complexity of wastewater effluents, their toxicity remains hard to assess. The use of caged mussels has been proved to be a convenient and efficient approach to assess the biological effects of a discharge mixture in the field without prior information on its chemical composition [3]. Particularly, the use of indigenous species such as Elliptio complanata is relevant to gain knowledge concerning wild species chronically exposed to the effluent [4,5]. Genotoxicity endpoints deserve to be studied since it is noteworthy that genotoxic impacts can lead to heritable mutations with potentially detrimental effects on aquatic organism populations [6]. The use of genotoxic endpoints is therefore relevant to assess the toxic impact of municipal effluents.
The aim of this study was to assess the potential genotoxic impact of a municipal effluent discharge on Elliptio complanata caged in the St Lawrence River. Mussels were caged upstream and downstream the effluent of the third largest municipal treatment plant in the world, which can support a flow rate about 2.5 to 7.6 million m3 per day. Recently, ozonation has been chosen to improve the wastewater treatment and might be operational in the coming years. The genotoxic impact of the effluent was studied on caged mussels whose the condition index and the hemocytes viability have been measured, dis- playing the general health status of organisms. Three biomarkers of damage were used on hemocytes, which are considered as a target cell type due to their direct contact with xenobiotics and their numerous roles as circulating cells. Hemocytes are in charge of the transport and digestion of nutrients and the organism defense by the immune response [7]. Lipid peroxidation of membranes was analyzed as an oxidative stress index and DNA damage was assessed by the Comet assay and by the alkaline DNA precipitation method.

Materials and Methods

Mussel handling and caging

Elliptio complanata collected in a pristine site were allowed to depure for 2 months in lab- oratory at 15°C in filtered and dechlorinated water and fed daily with commercial algal nutrient mix (Phytoplex®, KentMarine) and cultured Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata microalgae prior to caging experiment. For the experiment, two cages of ten mussels (average weight 63.5±11.2 g and shell length 85.8±7.8 mm) were attached to sediment traps deployed during 30 days according to the Standard Guide for Conducting In-situ Field Bioassays With Caged Bivalves and to previous in situ-studies using Elliptio complanate [5]. Seven sites were chosen in the St Lawrence River: 200 m upstream, 2 km downstream (site called Effluent), 10 km and 20 km downstream from the effluent input (sites called DS1, DS2, DS3, DS4, DS5) (Figure 1). Water parameters (temperature, pH, conductivity, flow rate and suspended matter) were checked every week. At the end of the caging procedure, mussels were allowed to depure overnight in dechlorinated water at room temperature (22°C). The weight and the shell length of the mussels were measured in order to determine the condition factor expressed as weight/shell length.

Biomarkers

Hemolymph was collected from the anterior adductor muscle with a 23G needle syringe. Hemocytes counting and viability were deter- mined by flow cytometry (PCA Guava Cytometer) using the ViaCount solution kit (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA, USA). At least 5000 events were acquired. Fifteen mussels per site were punctured.
Measurements of total protein content, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in hemolymph were carried out on 8 mussels per site. The protein content was determined in cell free supernatant (9000 g, 10 min) according to the Bradford method [8], using the BioRad Protein Assay and Bovine Serum Albumine as a standard. Lipid peroxidation (LPO) was measured in cell pellet (1 mL of hemolymph centrifuged at 1000 g, 10 min, withdrawal of 500 µL of the supernatent) according to the thiobarbituric acid method [9]. Thiobarbituric acid reactants were determined by fluorescence (540 nm Ex and 600 nm Em) and tetramethoxypropane was used for calibration. The levels of DNA strand breaks were determined in cell pellet by the alkaline DNA precipitation assay described by Olive (1988) [10]. The principle of the assay is based on the selective precipitation of nuclear DNA from the more soluble DNA strand frag- ments followed by the fluorescent detection of the stranded DNA remaining in the supernatant (360 nm Ex and 450 nm Em) after staining with the Hoescht dye. Standard solutions of salmon sperm DNA were used for calibration. The results were expressed as g of DNA strands/mg proteins [11]. A Synergy 4 Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., USA) was used for protein content, LPO and DNA strandbreaks measurements.
The Comet assay (alkaline version) was performed according to the procedure described by Singh et al. (1988) [12] and modified as follows: 20 µL of hemolymph collected from the mussel muscle were mixed with 20 µL of 1% low melting point agarose prepared in phosphate buffered saline at 37°C. This mixture was spread on a frosted microscope slide pre- coated with normal agarose (1%), and was covered with a 22×22 mm coverslip (two gels per slide). Coverslips were withdrawn after agarose polymerization (4°C, 5 min), and slides were incubated for 90 min in a lysing solution (2.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 10% DMSO, 1% Triton X100; pH 10) at 4°C in the dark. The slides were then placed 30 min in an electrophoresis buffer (0.3 M NaOH and 1 mM Na2EDTA, pH>13) to allow the unwinding of DNA. Electrophoresis was carried out at 25 V (0.61 V/cm) and 300 mA for 24 min. Slides were then washed three times for 5 min with a neutralization buffer (0.4 M Tris–HCl, pH 7.5) and dried in absolute ethanol. After staining with Sybr Green solution, each slide was viewed by fluorescence microscopy (*400). Results were gained by a visual scoring system, for which a total of 100 randomly selected cells on each gel were classified as belonging to one of five categories of comets according to the tail and head intensity [13].

Results and Discussion

Each week, physicochemical parameters were measured. Water bodies can be differentiated according to the conductivity measurements, allowing to estimate the plume dispersion (Table 1).
After 30 days of caging, survival rate of mussels was not affected, nor the condition index. However, a significant cytotoxic effect was measured in hemocytes collected in mussels caged in Effluent and DS 4 sites. This cytotoxic effect can be directly correlated with the toxicity of the effluent. Significant genotoxic impacts were observed in mussels exposed to the effluent discharge (site Effluent) whatever the genotoxicity endpoint used (Figure 2). This result was correlated with an increase in lipid peroxidation, compared to upstream response. The correlation between biomarkers responses were analyzed by Spearman correlation. The hemocytes viability was significantly correlated to DNA damage (Comet assay) and LPO (Pearson coefficient=0.41 and 0.37 respectively). These results highlight the effect of the chemical contamination from the municipal effluent input. A positive correlation was also found between DNA damage and LPO results (Pearson coefficient=0.37). The genotoxic impact of a municipal effluent had previously been stressed in Elliptio complanata in a laboratory study where increasing concentrations of effluents altered the mussel DNA (determined by the alkaline precipitation assay) and DNA metabolism highlighted by changes in key enzymes for purine and pyrimidine synthesis (dehydrofolate reductase and aspartate transcarbamoylase) and catabolism of purines (xanthine oxido-reductase) [4]. Increases in DNA damage revealed by the Comet assay and in membrane lipid peroxidation were still measured in mussels encaged 20 km downstream the effluent discharge despite a massive flow rate in the St Lawrence River. The induction factor of DNA damage between upstream site and the effluent site reached 3.4 whereas at the furthest down- stream site in the plume dispersion (DS 4) a 5.3-fold increase was reached. At DS4, this was associated with low suspended matter content in the surface water. Since hydrophobic genotoxic agents are mostly adsorbed to suspended particulate matter [14], the dissolved fraction of contaminants increase along the dispersion plume with the decrease of suspended matter. A fraction of low Kow hydrophilic genotoxicants such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides could be suspected to engender additional DNA dam- age at this site. The results also underlined the importance of the dissolved phase exposure route for mussels compared to the particulate one as previously shown on caged Elliptio complanata exposed to metals [15]. It is noteworthy that caged organisms at the same distance from the effluent but in a different water body exhibited lower or no effect depending on the biomarker studied. This was particularly observed between the sites DS 4 and DS 5. According to these results, water bodies could be differentiated between the north and the south shore according to their genotoxic impact, correlated with the presence of effluent dispersion plume. DNA integrity measurement in caged mussels confirms previous findings on the genotoxicity of municipal effluents
where the Comet assay represents a sensitive method for assessing the impacts of municipal wastewaters [16]. Interestingly, an increase in DNA damage revealed by the Comet assay was found in mussels caged in DS 1 compared to upstream site, despite the absence of the effluent dispersion plume of interest at DS1 site. Due to the DS1 location near the shore, this result suggests that a release of genotoxicants could originate from another known municipal WWTP located nearby the site. Finally, the water bodies’ toxicity could be highlighted according to their genotoxicity although a chemical characterization of the water samples would reinforce this result. Although the improvement of the wastewater treatment, effluent discharge is responsible for the input of a complex mixture of contaminants, some of them leading to genotoxicity and oxidative stress in freshwater mussels. Previous experiments using caged Elliptio complanata down-stream a municipal effluent have stressed a modulation of immune response and induction of detoxification metabolism.3 The present study confirmed the relevancy of the caging approach to investigate the short term ecotoxicological effects of municipal effluent.

Acknowledgments

we are grateful to M. Arseneau and G. Brault for their help in the field, and to M. Gélinas and J. Auclair for their help in the laboratory.

References

  1. Ohe, T.; Watanabe, T.; Wakabayashi, K. Mutagens in surface waters: A review. Mutat Res 2004, 567, 109–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Joss, A.; Siegrist, H.; Ternes, T.A. Are we about to upgrade wastewater treatment for removing organic micropollutants? Water Sci Technol 2008, 57, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Farcy, E.; Gagné, F.; Martel, L.; Fortier, M.; Trépanier, S.; Brousseau, P.; et al. Short-term physiological effects of a xenobiotic mixture on the freshwater mussel Elliptio complanata exposed to municipal efflu ents. Environ Res 2011, 111, 1096–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gagné, F.; Bouchard, B.; André, C.; Farcy, E.; Fournier, M. Evidence of feminization in wild Elliptio complanata mussels in the receiving waters downstream of a municipal effluent outfall. Comp Biochem Phys C 2011, 153, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bouchard, B.; Gagné, F.; Fortier, M.; Fournier, M. An in-situ study of the impacts of urban wastewater on the immune and reproductive systems of the freshwater mussel Elliptio complanata. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2009, 150, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jha, A.N. Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: An overview. Mutat Res Fund Mol M 2004, 552, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cheng, T.C. Bivalves. In Invertebrates Blood Cells; Ratcliffe, N.A., Rowley, A.F., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wills, E.D. Evaluation of lipid peroxidation in lipids and biological membranes. In Biochemical Toxicology: A Practical Approach; Snell, K., Mullock, B., Eds.; IRL Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  10. Olive, P.L. DNA precipitation assay: A rapid and simple method for detecting DNA damage in mammalian cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 1988, 11, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gagné, F.; Blaise, C. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of environmental contaminants in sediments to rainbow trout hepatocytes. Environ Toxic Water 1995, 10, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singh, N.P.; McCoy, M.T.; Tice, R.R.; Schneider, E.L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988, 175, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Collins, A.R.; Dobson, V.L.; Dušinská, M.; Kennedy, G.; Št tina, R. The comet assay: What can it really tell us? Mutat Res Fund Mol M 1997, 375, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. White, P.A.; Rasmussen, J.B.; Blaise, C. Genotoxic substances in the St. Lawrence system I: Industrial genotoxins sorbed to particulate matter in the St. Lawrence, St. Maurice, and Saguenay Rivers, Canada. Environ. Toxicol Chem 1998, 17, 286–303. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gagnon, C.; Gagné, F.; Turcotte, P.; Saulnier, I.; Blaise, C.; Salazar, M.; et al. Exposure of caged mussels to metals in a primary-treated municipal wastewater plume. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lacaze, E.; Devaux, A.; Mons, R.; Bony, S.; Garric, J.; Geffard, A.; et al. DNA damage in caged Gammarus fossarum amphipods: A tool for freshwater genotoxicity assessment. Environ Poll 2011, 159, 1682–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location map of the study area showing the 7 studied sites where mussels were caged (green points): Upstream, Effluent, Downstream: DS 1, DS2 (10 km downstream the effluent input), DS 3, DS 4, DS 5 (20 km downstream the effluent).
Figure 1. Location map of the study area showing the 7 studied sites where mussels were caged (green points): Upstream, Effluent, Downstream: DS 1, DS2 (10 km downstream the effluent input), DS 3, DS 4, DS 5 (20 km downstream the effluent).
Jox 03 s1e6 g001
Figure 2. Biomarker responses in hemocytes (A) DNA damage detected by the Comet assay, (B) DNA damage measured as DNA strands by alkaline precipitation, (C) Lipid peroxidation of hemocytes membranes. Results are expressed as mean±SD, n=8. Differences between sites were tested using one-way ANOVA and Mann Whitney U test. Different letter indicates significant difference (P<0.05).
Figure 2. Biomarker responses in hemocytes (A) DNA damage detected by the Comet assay, (B) DNA damage measured as DNA strands by alkaline precipitation, (C) Lipid peroxidation of hemocytes membranes. Results are expressed as mean±SD, n=8. Differences between sites were tested using one-way ANOVA and Mann Whitney U test. Different letter indicates significant difference (P<0.05).
Jox 03 s1e6 g002
Table 1. Water characteristics at the different sites and summary of biological parameters.
Table 1. Water characteristics at the different sites and summary of biological parameters.
Jox 03 s1e6 i001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lacaze, E.; Devaux, A.; Bony, S.; Bruneau, A.; André, C.; Pelletier, M.; Gagné, F. Genotoxic Impact of a Municipal Effluent Dispersion Plume in the Freshwater Mussel Elliptio complanata: An In Situ Study. J. Xenobiot. 2013, 3, s1e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/xeno.2013.s1.e6

AMA Style

Lacaze E, Devaux A, Bony S, Bruneau A, André C, Pelletier M, Gagné F. Genotoxic Impact of a Municipal Effluent Dispersion Plume in the Freshwater Mussel Elliptio complanata: An In Situ Study. Journal of Xenobiotics. 2013; 3(s1):s1e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/xeno.2013.s1.e6

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lacaze, E., A. Devaux, S. Bony, A. Bruneau, C. André, M. Pelletier, and F. Gagné. 2013. "Genotoxic Impact of a Municipal Effluent Dispersion Plume in the Freshwater Mussel Elliptio complanata: An In Situ Study" Journal of Xenobiotics 3, no. s1: s1e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/xeno.2013.s1.e6

APA Style

Lacaze, E., Devaux, A., Bony, S., Bruneau, A., André, C., Pelletier, M., & Gagné, F. (2013). Genotoxic Impact of a Municipal Effluent Dispersion Plume in the Freshwater Mussel Elliptio complanata: An In Situ Study. Journal of Xenobiotics, 3(s1), s1e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/xeno.2013.s1.e6

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop