Previous Article in Journal
A Modified Technique for Medial Pin Placement in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Prospective Real-Time Screw Placement Using O-Arm Navigation

by
David W. Polly
1,2,
Kenneth J. Holton
1,
Paul Brian O. Soriano
1,
Jason J. Haselhuhn
1,
Kari Odland
1,*,
Jonathan N. Sembrano
1,
Christopher T. Martin
1 and
Kristen E. Jones
1,2
1
The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
2
The Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2025, 14(4), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040037
Submission received: 11 February 2025 / Revised: 1 May 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 23 October 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A variety of techniques for pedicle screw placement exist. Efficiency claims have varied, but limited data are available to support or refute these claims. Our goal was to study our screw placement efficiency, reporting real-time screw placement using O-arm 3D navigation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients from July 2019 to February 2022 who were undergoing primary procedures involving thoracolumbar pedicle and pelvic screw placement with O-arm navigation. Screw time began at the first placement of the navigated probe/awl and ended once the navigated screwdriver was removed from the screw head. Confirmatory 3D scans were performed to assess all screw placements. Results: The real-time average to place pedicle screws was 2 min 9 s (SD ± 1 min 5 s); for pelvic screws, this was 3 min 36 s. Screw placement was slightly faster in pediatric patients (2 min 3 s) vs. adults (2 min 24 s), p < 0.001. Screw placement was faster in the thoracic spine (2 min 2 s) vs. the lumbosacral spine (2 min 22 s), p < 0.001. Screw placement was faster in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (2 min 0 s) vs. all other diagnoses (2 min 24 s), p < 0.001. Screw placement performed by a single attending surgeon (2 min 24 s) was no different from dual-surgeon placement(2 min 13 s), p = 0.35. Conclusions: Our screw placement time is shorter than previously published estimates, and has a very high accuracy rate. While there are variations in how time is reported compared to the previous literature, our study serves as a benchmark for real-time screw placement for future studies. The use of navigation technology for pedicle and pelvic screw placement can be efficient.
Keywords: screw placement time; O-arm navigation; navigated screw placement; adult idiopathic scoliosis; adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; placement accuracy; workflow screw placement time; O-arm navigation; navigated screw placement; adult idiopathic scoliosis; adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; placement accuracy; workflow

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Polly, D.W.; Holton, K.J.; Soriano, P.B.O.; Haselhuhn, J.J.; Odland, K.; Sembrano, J.N.; Martin, C.T.; Jones, K.E. Prospective Real-Time Screw Placement Using O-Arm Navigation. Surg. Tech. Dev. 2025, 14, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040037

AMA Style

Polly DW, Holton KJ, Soriano PBO, Haselhuhn JJ, Odland K, Sembrano JN, Martin CT, Jones KE. Prospective Real-Time Screw Placement Using O-Arm Navigation. Surgical Techniques Development. 2025; 14(4):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Polly, David W., Kenneth J. Holton, Paul Brian O. Soriano, Jason J. Haselhuhn, Kari Odland, Jonathan N. Sembrano, Christopher T. Martin, and Kristen E. Jones. 2025. "Prospective Real-Time Screw Placement Using O-Arm Navigation" Surgical Techniques Development 14, no. 4: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040037

APA Style

Polly, D. W., Holton, K. J., Soriano, P. B. O., Haselhuhn, J. J., Odland, K., Sembrano, J. N., Martin, C. T., & Jones, K. E. (2025). Prospective Real-Time Screw Placement Using O-Arm Navigation. Surgical Techniques Development, 14(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop