Next Article in Journal
Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia Due to PMM2 Mutation in Two Siblings with Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Multiple Tissue Factors in the Cartilage of Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pediatric Reports
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/pediatric14040051
pediatrrep-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters

by
Andrea Manzotti
1,2,3,
Alessia Alati
1,3,
Matteo Galli
1,3,
Francesco Cerritelli
1,
Chiara Leva
3,
Adele Alberti
3,
Alessandro Stizzoli
3,
Sara Costanzo
4,
Carlotta Paola Maria Canonica
4,
Francesca Destro
4,
Gianvincenzo Zuccotti
4,5,
Valeria Calcaterra
6,7 and
Gloria Pelizzo
4,6,*
1
RAISE Laboratory, Clinical Based-Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, 65121 Pescara, Italy
2
Division of Neonatology, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, ASST-FBF-Sacco, 20154 Milan, Italy
3
Research Department SOMA, Istituto Osteopatia Milano, 20126 Milan, Italy
4
UOC of Pediatric Surgery Unit, Children’s Hospital “V. Buzzi” ASST-FBF-Sacco, 20154 Milan, Italy
5
Pediatric Department, Children’s Hospital “Vittore Buzzi”, 20154 Milan, Italy
6
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “L. Sacco”, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
7
Pediatrics and Adolescentology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pediatr. Rep. 2022, 14(4), 434-443; https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric14040051
Submission received: 24 July 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital malformation that affects the normal esophageal development. Surgical treatment, although restoring the integrity of the alimentary tract, may lead to long-term sequelae-like developmental abnormalities and musculoskeletal deformities. We evaluated the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on the recovery of the range of the right upper limb movement and on the rise of the auxological parameters. A case series of five children affected by type C EA were described. Six OMT sessions were performed over a 4-month period. At each treatment, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and range of motion (ROM) in elevation of the right upper limb were assessed. OMT was applied to improve scar, larynx, rib cage, and sternum mobility. An average change of 2.3 cm in height and an average increase of 8° in the ROM of the upper limb in the period of study were detected. Additionally, OMT could improve the anthropometric data and the mobility of the right upper limb of children surgically treated for EA. Further studies that evaluate the effectiveness of OMT in post surgical treatment of congenital malformations of the thorax can be considered in the future.

1. Introduction

Esophageal atresia (EA) is represented by the congenital absence of a portion of the esophagus. It is considered a rare disease, with an incidence of 1 in 2500 births [1]. According to the Gross classification (Esophageal atresia with a distal tracheoesophageal fistula), type C is the most frequent form, accounting for 85% of all cases [1,2]. Infants affected by this pathology usually undergo surgery during the early stages of life, and the intervention may be performed through a thoracotomy or a thoracoscopy, depending on the patient’s characteristics and the surgeon’s choice.
A posterolateral thoracotomy is frequently used in pediatric surgery. It provides an adequate working space and access to the posterior mediastinum, allowing for expansion of the surgical field as needed in cases of technical difficulties or complications [3,4,5]. Through this incision, the surgeon cuts at least one (often the latissimus dorsi) or several major thoracic muscles such as the anterior dentate, trapezius, and rhomboid muscles [4].
This type of surgery may lead to severe complications such as acute postoperative pain, disturbance to lung dynamics, and a reduction in the performance of the right shoulder girdle [3]. In the long term, this surgical approach can generate comorbidities affecting the musculoskeletal system, such as the alteration of the scapulohumeral kinetics, morphological dysfunction of the spine such as thoracogenic scoliosis, and alterations of the respiratory kinetics, such as costal fusions [4]. The cause of these sequelae could be attributable to post-surgical scar adhesions, which reduce the resilience of the tissue–including the fascial connective tissue–and its elastic return capacity if distorting forces are applied. Fascial tissue is connective tissue that surrounds blood vessels, nerves, viscera, meninges, bones, and muscles, dividing the body into various layers at different depths [6]. Surgery, as is the case with trauma or diabetes, can alter fascial tissue favoring fibrosis [7].
Osteopathy is a complementary alternative medicine (CAM) based on manual evaluation and treatment. “Touch” has a fundamental role in osteopathy, both in the assessment of the patients [8] and for treating different parts of the body such as the fascial system, following the World Health Organization (WHO) benchmark for the osteopathic profession [9,10]. Several studies have shown how OMT can modulate the inflammatory cytokines leading to the regulation of fibroblast activity, and probably a large-scale relaxation of the connective tissue [11,12,13]. OMT can also improve the range of motion (ROM), demonstrated in different clinical contexts [6,14,15] by using different types of techniques including myofascial release, articular and visceral ones. A gentle approach to the musculoskeletal structure appears to be helpful to modulate the activity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [16,17]. An increase of the parasympathetic function by interacting with the interoceptive process at the brain level is apparent, specifically the insular cortex, and its control on the whole body [9,18,19]. Reducing the signs of allostatic load in children after surgery is an important condition to prevent postural and neurodevelopmental issues, allowing them to have normal breathing and feeding parameters [20,21,22]. Furthermore, osteopathy has proved to be effective and safe in the pediatric field and in the management of EA [23,24].
In this study, we present a case series of five children operated on for EA type C in neonatal age, in which we describe a possible variation on the right shoulder range of motion (ROM) and other biometric indicators (e.g., BMI, weight and height) after OMT intervention.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

A series of five patients (4 males and 1 female), submitted to surgery for EA type C at the Pediatric Surgery Unit in the “Vittore Buzzi” Children’s Hospital were studied. Demographic, anamnestic, clinical and instrumental data were recorded.
The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the local ethics committee (563-04/05/2018). Informed written consent was obtained from the parents and/or legal guardian after receiving information about the study.

2.2. Clinical Findings and Diagnostic Assessment

After obtaining parental consent, we organized 6 sessions of OMT to be carried out over 4 months. Before each session, the following parameters were assessed: weight, height, body mass index (BMI, calculated as Weight/Height2) and the mobility and range of motion (ROM) of the upper limb in elevation through a manual goniometer evaluation. Each child was investigated carefully through osteopathic manual assessment, which consists of the evaluation of resistance in passive motion and in individualization of non-homogenous and non-compliant areas, also known as somatic dysfunction [8,25]. The manual assessment monitors the relevance of the scar limitation at the level of the other areas of the body, and assesses the presence of different regions of restriction on the hyoid, larynx, esophagus/sternum, and ribs/diaphragm. These elements are involved both in the intervention and the malformation itself. The evaluation was performed by an osteopath with at least five years of pediatric experience, through osteopathic procedures described by Bergna et al. (2020) and Manzotti et al. (2020) [8,25].

2.3. Therapeutic Intervention

Osteopathic manipulative treatment is used to alleviate somatic dysfunction and thereby restore normal motion and function throughout the body [26].
The main focus of the treatment is to restore a physiological ROM by increasing the movement of the scars, ribs, sternum, vertebrae, superficial cervical fascia, hyoid, larynx, diaphragm and the upper limb. The techniques adopted are all classified in the Glossary of osteopathic terminology. These included joint mobilization, soft tissue techniques, myofascial release, balanced ligamentous techniques (BLT), osteopathy in the cranial field and visceral techniques [27,28]. There was no specific protocol for the choice of techniques; nevertheless, each case was adapted with the most suitable approach.
The second goal of the study was to improve respiratory and swallowing capacity. These functions were frequently impaired in all children with musculoskeletal restrictions.
The right lateral posterior scars were the main restricted areas we focused on during all treatments.
Direct and indirect techniques according to the “black box” method were applied [6] to make the areas of restriction more compliant and free [29], according to the assumption that the manipulative osteopathic treatment supports the metabolic processes, promotes vascularization and improves ROM [6,15,30].

3. Results

3.1. Patient Data

3.1.1. Case 1

A 5-year-old boy, born at term by eutocic delivery, underwent a right lateral thoracotomy with muscle sparing approach on day 2 of life after a diagnosis of EA with distal fistula. He needed two endoscopic dilatations following the intervention. The child often experienced reflux issues that were treated with specific medications. Respiratory tract infections occurred more than three times per year. He sometimes experienced dysphagia for solid food. His parents reported no significant problems in his daily life activities.
He underwent 6 treatments in 70 days. During this period there was a 3.5 cm increase in his height, going from 106 to 109.5; while the ROM of the upper limb increased from 165° to 171°. On the other hand, a decreased BMI was observed due to a reduction in body weight, Table 1.

3.1.2. Case 2

The second case is a girl of 5 years of age, born by cesarean delivery. A right muscle-sparing lateral thoracotomy was performed at two days of life after a diagnosis of EA with distal fistula. She also presented with a left superior vena cava draining into the left atrium, and sacralization of the first coccygeal vertebra with absence of the others. The girl often experienced gastroesophageal reflux, which was treated through specific drugs and modified postures for overnight rest. Respiratory infections, more than three times a year, were reported.
She received 6 treatments in 77 days. There was a height growth of 3 cm from 99 cm to 102 cm. The ROM of the upper limb remained at 158°. The weight remained constant at 14.7 kg, with a consequent reduction in the BMI, Table 1.

3.1.3. Case 3

A 3-year-old boy, preterm delivered, underwent a right lateral thoracotomy with a muscle sparing technique 9 months after birth for EA type C. He underwent 3 endoscopic dilations after surgery for esophageal stenosis. The child rarely experienced gastroesophageal reflux and did not need any specific drugs. He reported a maximum of three episodes of respiratory infections per year and did not show any problems in eating. He received 3 treatments in 62 days. There was no improvement in body measures, but there was a significant improvement in the ROM of the upper right limb from 137° to 158°.
The intervention was interrupted after 3 treatments due to family problems (difficulties in scheduling further appointments), Table 1.

3.1.4. Case 4

A 3-year-old boy, born by vaginal delivery, small for gestational age (SGA) with an Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR), was diagnosed at birth with esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. He was surgically treated through a right muscle-sparing lateral thoracotomy two days later. Respiratory failure occurred after surgery. A fundoplication was performed one year and 7 months after birth for gastro-esophageal reflux after not responding to medical treatment. He also underwent 8 endoscopic dilations during the routine follow-up. He had more than three episodes a year of respiratory infections, followed a specific diet, with frequent symptoms of esophageal food blockage.
The patient underwent 6 treatments in 85 days. His height increased from 90 to 93 cm, his weight increased by 800 g, with stability of BMI. The mobility of the upper limb in elevation raised from 164° to 167° without recording alterations in the normal functions of daily life, Table 1.

3.1.5. Case 5

A 7-year-old boy, born from eutocic birth at 39 weeks of gestation, underwent a lateral thoracotomy with a muscle sparing approach the day after birth, for a diagnosis of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. He sometimes experienced reflux episodes, which were treated with specific drugs. He manifested fewer than three episodes of respiratory tract infections per year. The patient received 4 treatments in less than a month. We recorded a 2 cm increase in height from 115.5 to 117.5, and the upper limb gained in elevation from 150° to 160°. The weight remained constant. The intervention was interrupted after 4 treatments because of the arrival of the summer holiday break, Table 1.
Overall, the median time from thoracotomy to the first osteopathic treatment was 5 years (range 2.25–7 years; mean 4.45 ± 1.68 years).
Table 1 shows pre- and post-treatment biometric parameters values for all cases.
The timeline of osteopathic evaluations and treatments of the patients are represented in Figure 1.

Technique

In Table 2, the techniques per each case during all OMT sessions are reported.

Outcome

As reported in Table 1, changes in the anthropometric parameters were detected.
The treatment showed no adverse events in any of the cases treated. On one occasion, an episode of reflux occurred during the session of OMT, and was resolved by lifting the patient’s head from the treatment table. No other side effects occurred during treatments or were reported by parents.
Regions with an impaired function in each case in the pre- and post-treatment period are described in Table 3.

4. Discussion

The data collected showed an improvement in the arc of movement in elevation of the right upper limb and an increase in height, even if the treatment was performed years after surgery.
As the literature suggests, pediatric surgical procedures may have short- and long-term effects on children and their families from both a pathophysiological and psychosocial points of view [31]. Considering the post-surgical sequelae on the musculoskeletal system, recent studies support the concept that the less invasive the surgery is, the more anatomical alterations of the movement system are avoided [5,32]. Our results on ROM could suggest that a better management of these frequent side effects can be offered.
In fact, a ROM deficit of the upper right limb is strongly documented in the literature [3]. Many studies consider the onset of scoliosis, thoracic deformities, scapular elevations, and limitation on the right shoulder ROM as a possible long-term postoperative risk [5,32,33]. The increase in mobility in shoulder elevation that we obtained in four out of five of the children, suggests that more research is needed to test the possibility of intervening through manipulative osteopathic treatment on these kinds of sequelae.
Several studies support the feasibility of increasing joint ROM with OMT in different contexts. Sposato & Bjerså [34] in their review investigated the effects of OMT applied to adults who underwent surgery. The results showed an increase of spinal ROM in flexion, extension, and bilateral lateral side bending in patients with lumbar discectomy compared to an exercise control group, and an increase in lateral flexion in patients with thoracotomy. Serra-Añó et al. [15] have shown an efficacy of myofascial relaxation on shoulder mobility in accordance with our results.
Another finding is the increase in height after the treatment period. Birketvedt et al. [35] reported in their study that 15% of children undergoing surgery for OA were classified as stunted. In our study, we can identify an increase in the height measures of three cases treated, compared with the linear measures of growth: in the first case, the child moved from about the 10th to about the 25th percentile; in the second case, the height changed from minus 2 standard deviations (SD)–as compared to the standard population–to near the 10th percentile; and in the fifth case, it varied from the 10th to over the 25th percentile. These results, according to Frongillo et al. [36], suggest the important role of evaluating the effects of an intervention using linear measures of growth. Weight values did not vary significantly, although we did not consider some parameters including fat mass and lean mass. As Weber et al. [37] showed in their study, body composition measurements can be useful to predict clinical outcomes and nutritional status. Even though the role of additional influences such as nutritional or developmental factors on the statural growth are not excluded, these factors (as per the treatment period) usually affect weight rather than height in a short time (we added the information in the text).
Early surgery in children is a significant stress factor, not only from the physical point of view, but also from the cognitive, emotional and psychosocial ones [31]. Height deficit can be related to an increase in the serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and cortisol as a result of the post-surgery condition [38]. Thinking about these connections and correlating the musculoskeletal system–with all its subdivisions, that include the fascial system–we can suppose that impaired growth may be linked to the presence of stress factors. Osteopathic treatment has demonstrated its efficacy in modulating autonomic nervous system function, favoring the enhancement of parasympathetic activity [30,39,40]. In 2019, a study demonstrated a reduction in allostatic biomarkers –evaluation of cortisol, diurnal catecholamines with urine tests, glycated hemoglobin, high-intensity lipoproteins, high reactive protein C sensitivity, blood pressure, BMI and hip-waist index–following osteopathic manipulative treatment [41]. Furthermore, it would be essential to introduce the evaluation of allostatic biomarkers to determine a real correlation between the results of the treatment and their supposed pathophysiological principles.
Additionally, current findings seem to substantiate the possible relationship between allostasis, osteopathic care, scar adhesion of the shoulder and the presence of somatic dysfunctions. This phenomenon can be explained through a physiological mechanism that takes place during the recovery and the formation of new scar tissue, which involves the proliferation of collagen tissue [7,42]. This altered thixotropic condition of the tissue can be assessed manually, by precise manual semeiotics. The latter then can be used to plan osteopathic manual treatment in order to induce specific neurobiological effects. Indeed, the documented anthropotropic effect of OMT could have a role in balancing the neuroinflammation response and tissue healing, acting further on the capacity of adaptation of the fascia and improving shoulder joint motion [30,43]. Further, in this context the bodily restrictions found after the treatments can be considered an adaptation to allostatic processes, and are not related to specific pathologies. In other words, by using a process of self-regulation, the body generates additional neurobiological adaptive strategies to overcome the musculoskeletal function impaired by surgery [25,43]. These strategies could be supported by osteopathy acting on tissue and fascia stiffness, reducing mechanical allostatic load and modulating the response of the autonomic nervous system [30,43].
It could be interesting to reduce the age of osteopathic intervention on children to ensure that the identified altered functions can be treated and resolved in the shortest possible time, in order to avoid chronic effects.
The authors acknowledge that the study has some limitations. Firstly, the concept of “case series” is not well defined and does not reflect a specific research design; according to the literature, and as in our manuscript, a case series should have more than four patients [44]. Moreover, five patients are still a limited number of cases, and a larger sample size should be considered to determine the absolute efficacy and to define the significance of the improvement in anthropometric parameters. Secondly, the heterogeneity of the patients in terms of age at the beginning of treatment, postoperative surgeries and associated complications could impact on the results. A control group for comparison should also be included in future research to confirm these preliminary findings. Additionally, despite the changes in ROM which has been usually described during the progress through adolescence and growth spurts than during childhood, the influence of physiological growth on the beneficial effects could be not excluded [45,46].
The treatments were conducted according to the “black box” method, well-described and accepted in osteopathy, which involves the application of different techniques depending on the somatic dysfunctions found. This is at the discretion of the operator, and could influence a less than positive final outcome in all patients and in the reproducibility of the results.
Furthermore, documenting the outcomes through photos of the subject on the frontal and sagittal plane, and pictures related to the mobility of the skeletal structures, could certainly improve the quality of the outcome measurements. Another limitation also relates to the timing of OMT after surgery; in fact, this high latency may negatively influence the effect of OMT, which is probably more useful in the early recovery of scar tissue [7].
Further research should also include allostatic biomarkers to better investigate the possible effects on growth and patient reported outcomes, such as quality of life, pain or disability and other measures, i.e., respiratory indicators (e.g., spirometry measures or optoelectronic plethysmography), to investigate other possible related effects.
Despite these limitations, our preliminary experience support shows that osteopathic treatment can be a feasible, well-tolerated and potentially advantageous approach in children with EA submitted to surgery, and which can undergo significant osteo-articular sequelae influencing the anthropometric parameters.

5. Conclusions

Our study supports the hypothesis that OMT may be useful to increase the ROM in children operated on with type C EA. The present case series might open doors for the use and development of manual therapy studies and routine healthcare assistance in pediatric surgery, creating opportunities for future multidisciplinary collaborations.
Other studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these preliminary effects on the linear measure of growth.

Author Contributions

A.M.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Project administration, Writing—review & editing. A.A. (Alessia Alati): Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation Investigation, Writing—original draft. M.G.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing—original draft. F.C.: Review & editing. C.L.: review & editing. A.A. (Adele Alberti): Review A.S.: Review. S.C.: Validation, Writing—review & editing, Resources, Supervision, Project administration. C.P.M.C.: Validation, Writing—Review & editing, Resources. F.D.: Validation, Writing—Review & editing, Resources; G.Z.: Writing—review & editing and supervision; V.C.: Writing—review & editing and supervision; G.P.: Validation, Writing—review & editing, Resources, Supervision, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (563-04/05/2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed written consent was obtained from the parents and/or legal guardian after receiving information about the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data collected in the first author’s personal databases and available under request.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Andy Otaqui, Tania Rota and Silvia Guarise for their invaluable help during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, N. Oesophageal Atresia and Tracheo-Oesophageal Fistula. Early Hum. Dev. 2014, 90, 947–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. van Lennep, M.; Singendonk, M.M.J.; Dall’Oglio, L.; Gottrand, F.; Krishnan, U.; Terheggen-Lagro, S.W.J.; Omari, T.I.; Benninga, M.A.; van Wijk, M.P. Oesophageal Atresia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2019, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Askarpour, S.; Peyvasteh, M.; Ashrafi, A.; Dehdashtian, M.; Malekian, A.; Aramesh, M.-R. Muscle-Sparing Versus Standard Posterolateral Thoracotomy in Neonates with Esophageal Atresia. ABCD Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. 2018, 31, e1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bianchi, A.; Sowande, O.; Alizai, N.K.; Rampersad, B. Aesthetics and Lateral Thoracotomy in the Neonate. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1998, 33, 1798–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Cui, X.; Huang, W.; Zhou, C. Clinical Analysis of Surgery for Type III Esophageal Atresia via Thoracoscopy: A Study of a Chinese Single-Center Experience. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2020, 15, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parravicini, G.; Bergna, A. Biological Effects of Direct and Indirect Manipulation of the Fascial System. Narrative Review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2017, 21, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pavan, P.G.; Stecco, A.; Stern, R.; Stecco, C. Painful Connections: Densification versus Fibrosis of Fascia. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2014, 18, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manzotti, A.; Cerritelli, F.; Chiera, M.; Lombardi, E.; La Rocca, S.; Biasi, P.; Galli, M.; Esteves, J.; Lista, G. Neonatal Assessment Manual Score: Is There a Role of a Novel, Structured Touch-Based Evaluation in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit? Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McGlone, F.; Cerritelli, F.; Walker, S.; Esteves, J. The Role of Gentle Touch in Perinatal Osteopathic Manual Therapy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 72, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. WHO. Benchmarks for Training in Traditional/Compementary and Alternative Medicine: Benchmarks for Training in Osteopathy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Degenhardt, B.F.; Johnson, J.C.; Fossum, C.; Andicochea, C.T.; Stuart, M.K. Changes in Cytokines, Sensory Tests, and Self-Reported Pain Levels After Manual Treatment of Low Back Pain. Clin. Spine Surg. Spine Publ. 2017, 30, E690–E701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Licciardone, J.C.; Kearns, C.M.; Hodge, L.M.; Bergamini, M.V.W. Associations of Cytokine Concentrations With Key Osteopathic Lesions and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: Results From the OSTEOPATHIC Trial. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2012, 112, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tozzi, P. Selected Fascial Aspects of Osteopathic Practice. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2012, 16, 503–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chaitow, L. What’s in a Name: Myofascial Release or Myofascial Induction? J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2017, 21, 749–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Serra-Añó, P.; Inglés, M.; Bou-Catalá, C.; Iraola-Lliso, A.; Espí-López, G.V. Effectiveness of Myofascial Release after Breast Cancer Surgery in Women Undergoing Conservative Surgery and Radiotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Support. Care Cancer Off. J. Multinatl. Assoc. Support. Care Cancer 2019, 27, 2633–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. D’Alessandro, G.; Cerritelli, F.; Cortelli, P. Sensitization and Interoception as Key Neurological Concepts in Osteopathy and Other Manual Medicines. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Manzotti, A.; Cerritelli, F.; Lombardi, E.; La Rocca, S.; Chiera, M.; Galli, M.; Lista, G. Effects of Osteopathic Treatment versus Static Touch on Heart Rate and Oxygen Saturation in Premature Babies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2020, 39, 101116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cerritelli, F.; Chiacchiaretta, P.; Gambi, F.; Perrucci, M.G.; Barassi, G.; Visciano, C.; Bellomo, R.G.; Saggini, R.; Ferretti, A. Effect of Manual Approaches with Osteopathic Modality on Brain Correlates of Interoception: An FMRI Study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Cerritelli, F.; Chiacchiaretta, P.; Gambi, F.; Saggini, R.; Perrucci, M.G.; Ferretti, A. Osteopathy Modulates Brain–Heart Interaction in Chronic Pain Patients: An ASL Study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Grunau, R.E.; Holsti, L.; Peters, J.W.B. Long-Term Consequences of Pain in Human Neonates. Semin. Fetal. Neonatal Med. 2006, 11, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tezza, G.; Paiola, G.; Zoccante, L.; Gandolfi, M.; Smania, N.; Ciceri, M.L.; Boner, A.; Piacentini, G.; Banzato, C. Gut-Brain Axis Exploration: Stabilometric Platform Performances in Children Affected by Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2021, 72, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Walker, K.; Holland, A.J.; Winlaw, D.; Sherwood, M.; Badawi, N. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes and Surgery in Neonates. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2006, 42, 749–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barni, A.; Zecchillo, D.; Uberti, S.; Ratti, S. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in a Paediatric Patient with Oesophageal Atresia and Tracheo-Oesophageal Fistula. Case Rep. Gastroenterol. 2019, 13, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Posadzki, P.; Lee, M.S.; Ernst, E. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Pediatric Conditions: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2013, 132, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bergna, A.; Vismara, L.; Parravicini, G.; Dal Farra, F. A New Perspective for Somatic Dysfunction in Osteopathy: The Variability Model. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2020, 24, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Licciardone, J.C.; Kearns, C.M.; Hodge, L.M.; Minotti, D.E. Osteopathic Manual Treatment in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbid Chronic Low Back Pain: Subgroup Results from the OSTEOPATHIC Trial. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2013, 113, 468–478. [Google Scholar]
  27. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM). Glossary of Osteopathic Terminology; AACOM: Chevy Chase, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cerritelli, F.; Martelli, M.; Renzetti, C.; Pizzolorusso, G.; Cozzolino, V.; Barlafante, G. Introducing an Osteopathic Approach into Neonatology Ward: The NE-O Model. Chiropr. Man. Ther. 2014, 22, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pizzolorusso, G.; Cerritelli, F.; D’Orazio, M.; Cozzolino, V.; Turi, P.; Renzetti, C.; Barlafante, G.; D’Incecco, C. Osteopathic Evaluation of Somatic Dysfunction and Craniosacral Strain Pattern among Preterm and Term Newborns. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2013, 113, 462–467. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cerritelli, F.; Cardone, D.; Pirino, A.; Merla, A.; Scoppa, F. Does Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Induce Autonomic Changes in Healthy Participants? A Thermal Imaging Study. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ben Ari, A.; Margalit, D.; Udassin, R.; Benarroch, F. Traumatic Stress among School-Aged Pediatric Surgery Patients and Their Parents. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. Off. J. Austrian Assoc. Pediatr. Surg. Al Z. Kinderchir. 2019, 29, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bastard, F.; Bonnard, A.; Rousseau, V.; Gelas, T.; Michaud, L.; Irtan, S.; Piolat, C.; Ranke-Chrétien, A.; Becmeur, F.; Dariel, A.; et al. Thoracic Skeletal Anomalies Following Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Atresia. Lessons from a National Cohort. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Okuyama, H.; Tazuke, Y.; Uenoa, T.; Yamanaka, H.; Takama, Y.; Saka, R.; Nara, K.; Usui, N. Long-Term Morbidity in Adolescents and Young Adults with Surgically Treated Esophageal Atresia. Surg. Today 2017, 47, 872–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sposato, N.S.; Bjerså, K. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Surgical Care: Short Review of Research Publications in Osteopathic Journals During the Period 1990 to 2017. J. Evid.-Based Integr. Med. 2018, 23, 2515690X18767671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Birketvedt, K.; Mikkelsen, A.; Klingen, L.L.; Henriksen, C.; Helland, I.B.; Emblem, R. Nutritional Status in Adolescents with Esophageal Atresia. J. Pediatr. 2020, 218, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frongillo, E.A.; Leroy, J.L.; Lapping, K. Appropriate Use of Linear Growth Measures to Assess Impact of Interventions on Child Development and Catch-Up Growth. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Weber, D.R.; Moore, R.H.; Leonard, M.B.; Zemel, B.S. Fat and Lean BMI Reference Curves in Children and Adolescents and Their Utility in Identifying Excess Adiposity Compared with BMI and Percentage Body Fat. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pervanidou, P.; Makris, G.; Chrousos, G.; Agorastos, A. Early Life Stress and Pediatric Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Henley, C.E.; Ivins, D.; Mills, M.; Wen, F.K.; Benjamin, B.A. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Its Relationship to Autonomic Nervous System Activity as Demonstrated by Heart Rate Variability: A Repeated Measures Study. Osteopath. Med. Prim. Care 2008, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ruffini, N.; D’Alessandro, G.; Mariani, N.; Pollastrelli, A.; Cardinali, L.; Cerritelli, F. Variations of High Frequency Parameter of Heart Rate Variability Following Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Healthy Subjects Compared to Control Group and Sham Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nuño, V.; Siu, A.; Deol, N.; Juster, R.-P. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Allostatic Load Lowering. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2019, 119, 646–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Midwood, K.S.; Williams, L.V.; Schwarzbauer, J.E. Tissue Repair and the Dynamics of the Extracellular Matrix. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lunghi, C.; Consorti, G.; Tramontano, M.; Esteves, J.E.; Cerritelli, F. Perspectives on Tissue Adaptation Related to Allostatic Load: Scoping Review and Integrative Hypothesis with a Focus on Osteopathic Palpation. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2020, 24, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Abu-Zidan, F.M.; Abbas, A.K.; Hefny, A.F. Clinical “case series”: A concept analysis. Afr. Health Sci. 2012, 12, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Storm, J.M.; Wolman, R.; Bakker, E.; Wyon, M.A. The Relationship Between Range of Motion and Injuries in Adolescent Dancers and Sportspersons: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Ballaz, L.; Plamondon, S.; Lemay, M. Ankle range of motion is key to gait efficiency in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Clin. Biomech. Bristol. Avon. 2010, 25, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pediatrrep 14 00051 g001 550
Figure 1. Timeline of osteopathic evaluations and treatments. Numbers indicate the session and arrows show the time between sessions in weeks. OMT = osteopathic manipulative treatment.
Figure 1. Timeline of osteopathic evaluations and treatments. Numbers indicate the session and arrows show the time between sessions in weeks. OMT = osteopathic manipulative treatment.
Pediatrrep 14 00051 g001
Table
Table 1. Synthesis of the biometric values for all the cases studied.
Table 1. Synthesis of the biometric values for all the cases studied.
Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5
Age (yrs)55337
Parameter
Pre and post treatmentPrePostPrePostPrePostPrePostPrePost
Height (cm)106109.59910286869093115.5117.5
Weight (kg)181714.514.710.5101212.822.222
BMI16.0214.3114.7513.4613.5213.5214.8113.8716.6416.07
Right shoulder elevation ROM (°)165°171°158°158°137°158°164°167°150°160°
Linear measure of growth (height, percentile)10th25th−2 SD to st. pop.10th5th5th5th5th10th25th
Z-score BMI0.48−1.21−0.29−0.92−1.73−2.55−1.06−1.070.650.25
Percentile BMI68th11th39th18th4th1st14th14th74th60th
Z-score Height for age−0.680.07−1.96−1.28−2.58−2.58−1.42−0.60−1.21−0.84
Percentile Height for Age25th53rd2.5th10th0.5th0.5th8th27th11th20th
Z-score Weight for Age−0.21−0.67−1.78−1.65−3.12−3.66−1.73−1.09−0.30−0.36
Percentile Weight for Age42nd25th4th5th0.1st0.1st4th14th38th36th
BMI = Body Mass Index; ROM = Range of Motion. BMI, weight and height percentile and z-score (standard deviation) was calculated according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) growth charts.
Table
Table 2. Techniques per each case during all OMT sessions.
Table 2. Techniques per each case during all OMT sessions.
Case 1
  • Fascial mobilization on the scar
  • Osteopathy in cranial field
  • BLT on right scapula and shoulder
  • BLT on diaphragm
  • BLT on sternal area
  • BLT on dorsal region
  • Visceral osteopathy
Case 2
  • Fascial mobilization on the scar
  • MFR on diaphragm
  • BLT on right scapula and shoulder
  • BLT on diaphragm
  • BLT on sternal area
  • BLT on dorsal region
  • Visceral osteopathy
Case 3
  • BLT on the scar
  • BLT on sternal area
  • BLT on dorsal region
  • Visceral osteopathy
Case 4
  • BLT on the scar
  • BLT on dorsal region
  • Visceral osteopathy
  • Osteopathy in cranial field
  • BLT on right scapula and shoulder
Case 5
  • Visceral osteopathy
  • BLT on right scapula and shoulder
  • Osteopathy in cranial field
  • BLT on diaphragm
BLT = Balanced Ligamentous Tension; MFR= Myo-Fascial Release.
Table
Table 3. Region restricted pre- and post-treatment period.
Table 3. Region restricted pre- and post-treatment period.
Region Restricted Pre-Treatment PeriodRegion Restricted Post Treatment Period
Case 1
  • Right postero-lateral scar
  • Left hypochondrial region
  • Dorsal region (T5-T9)
  • Dorsal region (T2-T9)
  • Right iliac region
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle
Case 2
  • Right postero-lateral scar
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle.
  • Dorsal region (T5-T9)
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle.
  • Sternal hypomobility
  • Hyoid restriction
Case 3
  • Right postero-lateral scar
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle
  • Dorsal region (T5-T9)
  • Right hypochondrial region
  • Right sacro-iliac joint
  • Sternal hypomobility
Case 4
  • Right postero-lateral scar
  • Upper cervical hypomobility
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle
  • Right iliac region
  • Upper cervical hypomobility
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle
Case 5
  • Right postero-lateral scar
  • Hypomobility of right scapula
  • Upper cervical hypomobility
  • Left pocondral region
  • Right iliac region
  • Hypomobility of diaphragm muscle
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manzotti, A.; Alati, A.; Galli, M.; Cerritelli, F.; Leva, C.; Alberti, A.; Stizzoli, A.; Costanzo, S.; Canonica, C.P.M.; Destro, F.; et al. Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters. Pediatr. Rep. 2022, 14, 434-443. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric14040051

AMA Style

Manzotti A, Alati A, Galli M, Cerritelli F, Leva C, Alberti A, Stizzoli A, Costanzo S, Canonica CPM, Destro F, et al. Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters. Pediatric Reports. 2022; 14(4):434-443. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric14040051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manzotti, Andrea, Alessia Alati, Matteo Galli, Francesco Cerritelli, Chiara Leva, Adele Alberti, Alessandro Stizzoli, Sara Costanzo, Carlotta Paola Maria Canonica, Francesca Destro, and et al. 2022. "Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters" Pediatric Reports 14, no. 4: 434-443. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric14040051

APA Style

Manzotti, A., Alati, A., Galli, M., Cerritelli, F., Leva, C., Alberti, A., Stizzoli, A., Costanzo, S., Canonica, C. P. M., Destro, F., Zuccotti, G., Calcaterra, V., & Pelizzo, G. (2022). Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters. Pediatric Reports, 14(4), 434-443. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric14040051

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop