Next Article in Journal
Socio-Economic and Environmental Factors Associated with Montenegro Skin Test Positivity in an Endemic Area of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Northern Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Keratinophilic Fungi in Public Park Soils of Mumbai, India
 
 
Microbiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 11 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistical Validity of Interleukin-6 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis

by
Sriparna Basu
1,*,
Shashikant Dewangan
1,
Shampa Anupurva
2 and
Ashok Kumar
1
1
Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
2
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microbiol. Res. 2012, 3(1), e5; https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2012.e5
Submission received: 20 October 2011 / Revised: 28 November 2011 / Accepted: 8 February 2012 / Published: 12 March 2012

Abstract

Use of empirical antibiotics in neonates with risk factors of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) is a common practice. A laboratory parameter is needed to help in the accurate diagnosis of EOS to avoid unnecessary use of antibiotics. The aim of this prospective observational cohort study was to compare the statistical validity of cord blood interleukin-6 (IL-6) with conventional sepsis screening as an early diagnostic marker for EOS. Eighty-seven neonates with antenatal risk factors for sepsis were followed up for 72 h for the development of EOS. Cord blood was collected for measurement of IL-6 concentrations. Blood culture and conventional sepsis screening (total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, C-reactive protein and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate) were sent for analysis soon after delivery. The study group comprised of symptomatic neonates with positive blood culture (n = 36). An equal number of gestational-age matched asymptomatic neonates without risk factor of sepsis served as controls. Statistical validity of IL-6 was compared with sepsis screening parameters as the diagnostic marker for EOS. Gram negative organisms were the predominant cause of EOS. The most commonly isolated organism was Acinetobacter baumanii. The sensitivity and specificity of IL-6 with a cut-off value of 40.5 pg/mL and area under curve of 0.959 were 92.3 and 90.48%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of different parameters of sepsis screening ranged from 37.5–68.75% and 47.95–57.35%, respectively. In conclusion, cord blood IL-6 can be used as a highly sensitive and specific early diagnostic marker of EOS at a cut-off concentration of 40.5 pg/mL.
Keywords: early onset neonatal sepsis; interleukin- 6; newborn; sepsis screening early onset neonatal sepsis; interleukin- 6; newborn; sepsis screening

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Basu, S.; Dewangan, S.; Anupurva, S.; Kumar, A. Statistical Validity of Interleukin-6 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 3, e5. https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2012.e5

AMA Style

Basu S, Dewangan S, Anupurva S, Kumar A. Statistical Validity of Interleukin-6 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis. Microbiology Research. 2012; 3(1):e5. https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2012.e5

Chicago/Turabian Style

Basu, Sriparna, Shashikant Dewangan, Shampa Anupurva, and Ashok Kumar. 2012. "Statistical Validity of Interleukin-6 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis" Microbiology Research 3, no. 1: e5. https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2012.e5

APA Style

Basu, S., Dewangan, S., Anupurva, S., & Kumar, A. (2012). Statistical Validity of Interleukin-6 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis. Microbiology Research, 3(1), e5. https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2012.e5

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop