Next Article in Journal
Exploring Local Reservoirs for Bacteriophages with Therapeutic Potential against ESKAPE Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds Synthesized by Trichoderma longibrachiatum Native to Semi-Arid Areas Show Antifungal Activity against Phytopathogenic Fungi of Horticultural Interest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Control of Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides Present in Forest Crops in Current Climatic Conditions

1
Section of Cluj-Napoca, Station of Bistrița, “Marin Drăcea” National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry, 400202 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry and Cadastre, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
RNP-ROMSILVA, County Forest Administration of Maramureș, 430314 Baia Mare, Romania
4
Station of Brașov, “Marin Drăcea” National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry, 500040 Brașov, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microbiol. Res. 2024, 15(3), 1441-1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030097
Submission received: 28 June 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 3 August 2024 / Published: 6 August 2024

Abstract

:
The production of oak seedlings in intensive crops involves the modification of natural conditions, namely the degree of humidity, through artificial irrigation, which favors the appearance of the pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides, responsible for the Oak Powdery Mildew (OPM) disease. Thus, it is necessary to identify new substances and technologies to control OPM. In this sense, new products approved by the European Union (EU) and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) were identified, both synthetic and, a great novelty, biological (based on chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans: COS-OGA). In order to quantify the results, a correlation was made with climatic factors, by sampling data related to temperature and relative humidity with Data Logger devices. The obtained results suggest that OPM has a high virulence in the temperature range of 20 to 30 °C; at a relative humidity above 75%. The data obtained from the field experiments show that the synthetic products controlled OPM with an effectiveness between 70% and 95%, and the biological product behaved almost similarly, between 60% and 90%, which creates high opportunities for environmentally friendly control of forest pathogens.

1. Introduction

Phytopathology is the branch of plant biology that requires continuous improvement, even more so the forestry one, which has as its object the study of the diseases of forest plants. These, having a long life cycle, are constantly threatened by pathogens, which evolve and constantly adapt to environmental factors, plant immunity, as well as substances used for control [1,2].
The implementation of sustainable forestry, a wish of the current forestry policies, requires the production of a healthy and vigorous planting material, in the necessary assortment, quantity, and quality [3], which will grow well under the conditions of the current climate dynamics. Climate change affects temperatures, precipitation both as a temporal distribution and annual average values, as well as the frequency of extreme weather events, so they can have a significant effect on the production of seedlings, but also on the spatial distribution of diseases [4].
In the last two decades, due to climate change, which is a consequence of anthropogenic activities, diseases occurring in forest plant species have become more frequent, causing considerable damage [5,6,7,8].
Ghelardini et al. [8] suggest that in the future, the continuing large-scale perturbations due to human activities, including the compounded effects of different anthropogenic stressors, will probably have large and difficult-to-predict impacts on forest ecosystems, changing species composition and altering biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem dynamics. Under such uncertain conditions, other drivers of forest disease emergence, known or unknown at the present time, might become prevalent or arise in a new or different way.
Global trade has also acted as a vector for the transmission of pathogens to new locations, while changing land use and intensive forestry practices have had a large impact on increasing disease severity and even led to the awakening of some latent and invasive pathogens such as Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi, Cryphonectria parasitica, Neonectria faginata, Erysiphe alphitoides, etc. [9].
Meanwhile, introduced species can invade new areas, especially in the case of pathogens, and can cause significant damage to native species [10]. Diseases caused by invasive pathogens have detrimental effects on ecosystem functions and production through damage to each infected tree [11,12].
The spectrum of pathogens, being subject to evolution, as a result of adaptations to natural environmental conditions or with clearly anthropic influences, although it is mostly known, can never be limited to a certain moment, and its knowledge requires a permanent follow-up. But, parallel to this spectrum of diseases, there is a permanent development of the diversity of technical solutions, on the one hand, based on new, non-polluting, and non-toxic products, and on the other hand, through the use of cultural methods, advantageous from an economic point of view and effective in the fight against diseases [13].
Li et al. [14] suggest that in the theory of invasion ecology, invasiveness has been associated both with the biological traits of the invasive species and with environmental and community features in the naturalized range that render an ecosystem prone to invasion and define invasibility. Social and economic factors are crucial for species introduction, whereas biogeographical and ecological factors are important for naturalization, with evolutionary forces being key mediators of invasiveness.
The species-energy theory suggests that, in regions with higher biomass productivity, host–pathogen system stability and the pathogen-carrying capacity of an ecosystem are higher. Host species persistence is higher in areas with varied topographical and edaphic conditions, and large ecosystem diversification [15].
Most pathogens were introduced into new areas accidentally through imported infected plant material. Since the elimination of an introduced species is impossible once it has become acclimatized, it is imperative to take measures to control it [12].
One such pathogen is Erysiphe alphitoides (Griffon and Maubl.), which is of North American origin and was reported in Europe in 1905 in the Iberian Peninsula, and in 1907 in France [10].
The pathogen had a very severe impact, especially on seedlings, the degree of severity being different depending on the oak species. The most severely affected species was the so-called Pyrenean oak, Quercus pyrenaica (Quercus toza), for which high mortality rates were observed in southwestern and western France. Quercus robur was then reported to be more sensitive than Quercus petraea, while Mediterranean evergreen oaks, Quercus cerris, Quercus rubra, and Quercus palustris were considered resistant. After a few years, the disease caused by Erysiphe alphitoides was considered less dramatic and is now well established. Currently, the disease has taken over the entire territory occupied by oaks in the northern hemisphere.
The disease manifests itself mainly on shoots and leaves, on which typical symptoms of powdery mildew appear, from spring to late autumn. The attacked leaves are deformed, asymmetric, brittle, and covered by the ectoparasite mycelium. Towards autumn, on both sides of the leaf, cleistothecia appear in the form of small, black, grouped dots. The attacked shoots do not develop completely and freeze in winter [10,16].
In Romania, the pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides was reported in 1908, initially in the Teleajen district (today Prahova county), expanding in a short time to all oak cultures in Romania.
Today, it is found in nurseries and forests, on all species of the Quercus genus, especially on young seedlings, where it can cause significant damage, through necrosis of young organs (leaves, stems), leading to drying of the plants if the attack is very strong. It also settles on mature trees, where damage is visible after successive long-term attacks. [17].
Long-term studies are needed to determine how plant pathogens evolve in response to the dynamics of environmental factors and human activities, and such studies are particularly important for managing the well-being of affected forests [18].
Complex research of a fundamental or applied nature regarding the production of seedlings has been carried out in most of the countries that produce forest seedlings, to respond to production requirements [9]. The aspects of the research aim to identify the factors that favor the production of the disease: causal pathogens, the environmental conditions that favor their appearance and spread, the susceptibility of forest species to pathogenic microorganisms in the soil, how the losses caused by the disease can be avoided or limited, through what means can increasing the resistance of the crops be achieved [19].
The negative impact of environmental factors on Romanian forests is similar to that described in most European countries. There are numerous situations in which the deterioration of the vegetation state of forest cultures, especially that caused by diseases in general and Erysiphe alphitoides in particular, has started to become frequent [20,21,22,23,24].
The production of forest seedlings is a constant need in forestry production to regenerate the forest fund both through plantations and by complementing natural regeneration. In intensive cultures from nurseries, where forest seedlings are produced, with the ensuring of optimal conditions for development, premises are also created for the development of infections with different pathogens, or infestations with various pests. It is thus necessary to apply both preventive (essential in the case of pathogens) and curative treatments [25,26].
Since certain products used to control pathogens no longer correspond to the new trends for environmental protection, it is necessary to carry out studies on the adaptability of pathogens to new climatic trends as well as the adaptation of new fungicides to the needs of forestry. These involve the combination of laboratory studies with those regarding the observation of pathogen behavior in the field [27,28].
The planting material must meet high quality standards to be able to be used in the development of quality, stable stands and to fulfill ecological and production functions. In the current context of international environmental protection policy, a wide range of chemical products intended to control and combat different pathogens in forest crops have been withdrawn due to the persistence of substances in the soil, or have been restricted by forest certification rules [29,30]. For this reason, for dangerous pathogens to be kept under control, it is necessary to test new products, already approved in the agricultural field, and to extend their approval for the control of diseases in the forestry field [31,32].
For example, the fungicides approved in agriculture for the control of biotic agents that produce powdery mildew are applied and act in different ways (demethylation inhibitors, carboxamides, aniline-pyrimidines, external quinone inhibitors, phthalimides, and inorganic sulfur, etc.) in forest crops; these fungicides encounter difficulties associated with the development of resistant fungal strains [33,34,35].
The aim of this study is to identify and promote in forestry practice some last-generation, synthetic, but especially biological, antifungal substances with high efficiency in the control of oak powdery mildew (OPM) in oak crops in nurseries in relation to the maximum efficiency from a phytosanitary, ecological, and economic point of view.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiments were located in the following:
(a)
the Valea Iușului Nursery within the Lechința Experimental Base;
(b)
the Voivodeni Forestry Nursery, within the Reghin Forest District (Table 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The experiments in the nurseries were carried out according to a methodology developed by the Forest Protection Collective of the National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry during the project PN190710205 (BIOSERV and adapted in PN23090102 (FORCLIMSOC) in order to obtain results that can be applied in production [33,36]. The trials were based on the method of experimental blocks, in which the block is represented by repetition (4 repetitions being placed), and within each repetition seven variants were placed:
(i) a sessile oak culture (year 1), in the nursery Valea Iușului—INCDS Experimental Base of Lechința,
(ii) a pedunculate oak culture (year 2), in the nursery of Voivodeni—Forest District of Reghin (RNP-ROMSILVA).
Three treatments in each culture were applied in the period 8 June–6 August 2023. Disease severity (DS) was estimated before and after the treatments, using an interval 0–4 scale system:
-
ua—uninfected,
-
w—low: small, isolated yellow–green to yellow spots on 1–24% of leaf surface,
-
m—medium: large yellow spots, confluent on 25–74% of the leaf surface; these can also appear on non-lignified stems,
-
h—high over 75% generalized infections on the leaves and on the tips of the stems in the form of a white powder, which lead to their deformation and drying [33].
The experimental variants for testing antifungal substances are the following:
V1—proquinazid 20%, zero point one hundred twelve milliliters per zero point five liters of water (0.112 mL/0.5 L water);
V2—azoxistrobin 200 g/L + difeconazol 125 g/L, zero point five milliliters per zero point five liters of water (0.5 mL/0.5 L water);
V3—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane) one point thirty-three milliliters to zero point five liters of water (1.33 mL/0.5 L water);
V4—proquinazid 20%, zero point zero eighty-four milliliters to zero point five liters of water (0.084 mL/0.5 L water);
V5—azoxistrobin 200 g/L + difeconazol 125 g/L, zero point three hundred seventy-five milliliters to zero point five liters of water (0.375 mL/0.5 L water);
V6—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane) one milliliter to zero point five liters of water (1 mL/0.5 L water);
V7M—control (untreated variant).
Proquinazid is a new active substance from the group of quinazolines acting specifically against powdery mildew on vines and cereals. This inhibits the formation of apressors and the germination of spores, also inducing the plant’s defense reaction. This action is long-lasting and residual, with the culture being protected for a period of 14–21 days (the persistence of the treatment is 6–8 weeks).
Azoxystrobin is an active substance that acts as an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration, blocking the energy cycle of the pathogen. It intervenes in the biological cycle of the fungus, mainly during the germination of the spores and during the initiation of penetration into the plant tissues. It shows gradual uptake and local (translaminar) systemic activity in the leaves. Its activity is predominantly preventive.
Difenoconazole, the other compound of the fungicide, has preventive and curative actions. It acts by blocking the biosynthesis of steroids in the cell membranes of fungi. Local systemic action and slight acropetal translocation.
The biological fungicide based on chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans acts by increasing the amounts of PR-proteins (peroxidases, chitinases, gluconases) and PAL (phenylanine ammonium lyase). PAL is a key enzyme involved in the production of phytoalexins. Thus, cell walls are strengthened, proteins are synthesized and they help destroy pathogen cells, producing antimicrobial components (antibiotics produced by plants) [37,38,39].
After establishing the severity of the disease on the aforementioned scale, the degrees of attack were determined for each individual variant according to the Townsend–Heuberger formula: DS(%) = (∑(n × v))/(N × V) × 100, where: n: the degree of infection established according to a certain scale; v: the number of individuals in the respective category; N: the total number of classes; V: the total number of individuals (Abbreviations) [40].
Based on disease severity calculated using the formula above, the effectiveness of the treatments was evaluated according to the Abbot formula E(%) = 100 − Z, Z = DSv × 100/DSc, where E: effectiveness; DSv: degree of attack, in the treated variants; DSc: degree of attack, in the control variants; Z: the ratio between the degree of attack in the treated and control variants [33].
For the processing and interpretation of the data, the analysis of variance (Anova: Two-Factor without Replication) and the limit difference test (DL) LSD—Least Significant Difference were used.
Data logger devices -Trotec BL 30 (Figure 3) were installed in the experimental plots, with the help of which hourly data on air humidity and temperature were recorded. In the nurseries, the data were recorded between 16 May and 5 September 2023.

3. Results

Control of Oak Powdery Mildew (OPM)

The initial application of the treatments was conducted in accordance with the climatic factors and the periodicity recommended by the producers, 7–10 days, the interval between them being adjusted according to the climatic conditions in the field, established with the help of Data Logger devices.
(a) In the Valea Iușului nursery, OPM disease severity was very low; in 21 June, medium-sized seedlings were observed infected in the control variant; in August, the disease progressed; and in September, medium and highly affected seedlings were observed in the V7M control, V6—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane) 1 mL/0.5 L water and V3—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane) 1.33 mL/0.5 L water (Figure 4).
The incidence of the disease was reported in all experimental variants, starting with the constant achievement of an average daytime temperature between 20 °C and 30 °C, respectively, with the occurrence of fluctuations in relative humidity between 70 and 90%.
Thus, from the moment of the first determination of the severity of the disease in June, until the one in August, the advance of the infection was observed, with the month of September being the peak of the severity of the disease.
In the period from June to September, the average temperature was over 23.4 °C degrees Celsius, and the relative humidity was 75.7%, the optimal conditions for the development of the pathogen being met (Figure 4).
Disease severity is well controlled by the treatments used; the least effective treatment options are those with lower doses: V4—proquinazid 20%, 0.084 mL/0.5 L water, V5—azoxystrobin 200 g/L + difeconazole 125 g/L, 0.375 mL/0.5 L water, and V6—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans) 1 mL/0.5 L water, but these are also close in efficiency to the variants with the doses recommended by the manufacturers. The lowest efficiency was recorded in the V6 variant—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans) 1 mL/0.5 L water, from repetition 3 (Figure 5).
After performing the analysis of variance and the LSD test, significant differences at the 0.05 level and significant differences at the 0.01 level were observed between the V6 variants and the rest of the variants (Table 2).
As was observed in the disease severity, and in the case of the effectiveness of the treatments, significant differences at the 0.05 level and significant differences at the 0.01 level were observed between the V6 variants and the rest of the variants (Table 3), this variant being treated with 12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans) 1 mL/0.5 L water, biological fungicides in the smallest dose.
In the nursery Valea Iușului the attack of the pathogen recorded a maximum after the middle of August (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
(b) In the Voivodeni nursery, infected seedlings have been observed since June, the disease severity being an average one. On 6 June, seedlings from low to highly affected were identified in all variants, with V7M control being most medium and highly infected. In August, the disease progressed, and in September, a maximum percentage of moderate seedlings was recorded, and in variants Vb3—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane), V4—proquinazid 20%, Vb6—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane), and V7M control, highly affected seedlings were also observed (Figure 8).
As in the case of the Valea Iușului nursery, in the oak plot of the Voivodeni nursery, the occurrence of the disease was favored by the average temperature above 20 °C and the relative humidity which is maintained above 75% starting from June until the middle of the month August (Figure 8).
As in the case of the sessile oak culture in the Valea Iușului nursery and in the Voivodeni nursery, disease severity is kept well under control by the treatments used; the least effective treatment options are those with lower doses V4—proquinazid 20%, 0.084 mL/0.5 L water, V5—azoxystrobin 200 g/L + difeconazole 125 g/L, 0.375 mL/0.5 L water, and V6—12.5 g/L COS-OGA (chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans) 1 mL/0.5 L water, the percentage difference in the efficiency of the treatments compared to the versions with the doses recommended by the manufacturers reaching up to 30%. The lowest efficiency was recorded in variant V4—proquinazid 20%, 0.084 mL/0.5 L water, from repetition 3 (Figure 9).
After performing the analysis of variance and the LSD test, significant differences at the 0.05 level and significant differences at the 0.001 level were observed between variants V2, V3, and V6 and the rest of the variants (Table 4).
As was observed in the disease severity, and in the case of the effectiveness of the treatments, significant differences at the 0.05 level and significant differences at the 0.001 level were observed between variants V4, V5, and V6 and the rest of the variants (Table 5).
The main cause of the differences recorded between the variants in the Voivodeni nursery is due to the pedunculate oak, which, according to the specialized literature, is more sensitive to OPM.
In the nursery Voivodeni, the strong attack manifested itself from the beginning of August (Figure 10 and Figure 11).

4. Discussion

The nurseries are located in different natural areas, with varying influences on the development of the seedlings. The pathogens are directly influenced by the microclimates found in the nursery locations.
If the Voivodeni nursery is located in a meadow area, where the atmospheric humidity is relatively uniform throughout the growing season, the Valea Iușului nursery is located in a wooded area, where the relative humidity is quite varied, and some trees in proximity can be considered vectors of transmission of pathogens.
Seedlings obtained in nurseries are affected by pathogens due to the large number per surface unit; therefore, they must be constantly monitored and phytosanitary control measures applied to obtain the necessary quality and quantity [41,42,43].
The control measures used in the past involved the use of products that had good efficiency, but had a high retention in the soil. For this reason, at present, they are being withdrawn from forestry production; therefore, it is necessary to test new substances to obtain seedlings in good quality and in the quantities necessary to ensure the continuity of the forest fund [44].
Oak forest crops in nurseries are annually affected by the pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides that causes the “oak powdery mildew” disease, especially at the beginning of the growing season, when the leaves of the plants are in the development period, and the tissues directly exposed to the external environment are in the forming phase [10,45].
In the available specialized literature, starting with Hewitt in 1974, the correlation between the effects of temperature and relative humidity on mycelial development is described, with 25 °C and 96% relative humidity. Mycelial growth was observed at low relative humidity values of only 32% in the temperature range of 15–25 °C [46]. Pap et al. [47] obtained results similar to those obtained by Hewitt [46], concluding that a combination of favorable temperature and optimal humidity is of great importance in the epidemiology of the pathogen.
Also, Karadžić and Milijašević [48] observed that the strongest development is in the range of 20–30 °C and a relative humidity of 76–96%, and Glavaš [49] pointed out that powdery mildew spread requires moderate temperature, favorable relative humidity, light, and developing leaves.
According to Ramut and Pusz [12], rain is another factor that, on the one hand, favors the development of powdery mildew and, on the other hand, can also inhibit infection on plants. It all depends on the amount and length of rainfall and the ambient temperature. Moderate rainfall of around 80 mm, together with a moderate temperature of around 20 °C, is conducive to the development of the disease. Deviations from these parameters have a chilling effect on disease development. Various studies also showed the deleterious effect of heavy rainfall on powdery mildew fungi by flushing out spores and damaging the mycelium on the leaf surface. It was also found that the ability of the fungus to establish a parasitic relationship with the host strongly decreased with residence in water [12].
The use of fungicides to control the pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides has been limited in the last decade by the new EU and FSC environmental regulations; therefore, it is necessary to test and use approved fungicides used in other fields, such as agriculture, fruit growing, or viticulture [50], which, on the one hand, should be effective in combating “oak powdery mildew”, and on the other hand, have a reduced impact on the environment [51,52,53,54,55].
At this moment, the synthetic active substances azoxystrobin, difenoconazole, and proquinazid [56,57] are used worldwide in powdery mildew control, and COS-OGA (chito-oligosaccharides-oligogalacturonans) is among the non-polluting, biological fungicides [58] that can be used in the future in accordance with new regulations of environmental protection. Little is known about the effects of the organic fungicides applied to forest seedling production. The most common products that come close to biological ones are based on copper (Cu) and sulfur (S). Definitely, the replacement or reduction in chemical inputs by using sustainable and eco-friendly compounds might lead to benefits for the microbial communities in soils and for future seedling generations [59,60,61].
The use of different preparations called biostimulants against oak powdery mildew has been reported with different effects. Buraczyk et al. [62], used a preparation based on humic acids and chitosan polymers to reduce oak powdery mildew infestation but did not affect the growth and development of the seedling itself. In another study, Tkaczyk et al. [63] confirmed that the use of phosphite-based preparations also reduced the infestation of oak seedlings by Erysiphe alphitoides, although it was a side effect of the research conducted.
In this regard, as demonstrated by the present study, COS-OGA is able to reduce production losses and at the same time maintain the main characteristics of seedlings. According to the available information, this is the first use of COS-OGA to control powdery mildew or any other diseases in forestry. Its biological formulation and large spectrum against pathogens open new ways into the forest protection system.

5. Conclusions

The analyzed climatic factors, namely temperature and relative humidity, directly influence plant growth, but at the same time, influence and trigger the virulence of pathogens.
The experimental variants were treated when the initial situation was very favorable and the application of the first treatments took place when the infection did not appear. The infections caused by Erysiphe alphitoides, evaluated after the application of the last treatment, in the oak culture are weak, the percentages of medium and heavily attacked saplings being below 10%, compared to the control variants, where the percentage is over 50%, and in the case of oak are medium, 20–40%, compared to the control variant, where this percentage is over 70%.
Data obtained on the initiation of infection with the pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides, correlated with climatic factors, show that the infection spreads at a temperature in the range of 20 and 30 °C and a relative humidity above 75%, when it is necessary to apply the treatments at an interval of 7–10 days.
All tested fungicides registered significant differences compared to the untreated control, the best results being recorded in the V2 variant—azoxystrobin 200 g/L + difeconazole 125 g/L, 0.5 mL/0.5 L water. Also, the biological fungicide COS-OGA had a very close efficiency to that of the synthetic fungicides in the case of the treatments on both oak and sessile oak seedlings.
The use of synthetic fungal products and, in particular, biological ones, will have a direct impact on the production of oak seedlings from forest crops, which is reflected in avoiding losses due to the inability of seedlings to lignify.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.T., M.M. and V.Ș.; methodology, I.T., V.Ș., D.C. and F.C.; software, M.M. and M.I.V.; validation, I.T., V.Ș., M.R. and D.C.; resources, I.T. and D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M., I.T., D.C., V.Ș., F.C., M.R. and M.I.V.; visualization, D.C. and M.I.V.; supervision, I.T.; project administration, D.C.; funding acquisition, D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the projects PN 23090102 (FORCLIMSOC) (Contract 12N/2023), and CresPerfInst (Contract 34PFE/2021), both financed by the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, Romania.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

EUEuropean Union
FSCForest Stewardship Council
OPMoak powdery mildew
INCDSNational Institute for Research and Development in Forestry
uauninfected
wlow affected
mmedium affected
hhighly affected
mLmilliliter
Lliter
ggram
COS-OGAchito-oligozaharide-oligogalacturonane
PALphenylanine ammonium lyase
DSdisease severity
nthe degree of infection established according to a certain scale
vthe number of individuals in the respective category
Nthe total number of classes
Vthe total number of individuals
Eeffectiveness
DSvdegree of attack, in the treated variants
DScdegree of attack, in the control variants
Zthe ratio between the degree of attack in the treated and control variants
LDlimit difference test
LSDLeast Significant Difference

References

  1. Ghini, R.; Hamada, E.; Pedro Junior, M.J.; Marengo, J.A.; Gonçalves, R.R. Risk analysis of climate change on coffee nematodes and leaf miner in Brazil. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2008, 43, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rosenzweig, C.; Tubiello, F.N. Adaptation and mitigation strategies in agriculture: An analysis of potential synergies. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 2007, 12, 855–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Albrectsen, B.; Witzell, J. Disentangling functions of fungal endophytes in forest trees. In Fungi: Types, Environmental Impact and Role in Disease; Adolfo, P.S., María, S.N., Eds.; Science Publishers Incorporated: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yáñez-López, R.; Torres-Pacheco, I.; Guevara-González, R.G.; Hernández-Zul, M.I.; Quijano-Carranza, J.A.; Rico-García, E. The effect of climate change on plant diseases. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 2417–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bradshaw, R.E.; Ormond, S.; Dupont, P.Y.; Chettri, P.; Ozturk, I.K.; McDougal, R.L.; Bulman, L.S.; Cox, M.P. Reduced virulence of an introduced forest pathogen over 50 years. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Woods, A. Is the health of British Columbia’s forests being influenced by climate change? If so, was this predictable? Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 33, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Song, Q.; Deng, X.; Song, R.; Song, X. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote growth of seedlings, regulate soil microbial community, and alleviate damping-off disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani on Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2730–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ghelardini, L.; Pepori, A.L.; Luchi, N.; Capretti, P.; Santini, A. Drivers of emerging fungal diseases of forest trees. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 381, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Desprez-Loustau, M.-L.; Aguayo, J.; Dutech, C.; Hayden, K.J.; Husson, C.; Jakushkin, B.; Marcais, B.; Piou, D.; Robin, C.; Vacher, C. An evolutionary ecology perspective to address forest pathology challenges of today and tomorrow. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 45–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marçais, B.; Desprez-Loustau, M.L. European oak powdery mildew: Impact on trees, effects of environmental factors, and potential effects of climate change. Ann. For. Sci. 2014, 71, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Desprez-Loustau, M.L. Alien fungi of Europe. In Handbook of Alien Species in Europe; Hulme, P.E., Nentwig, W., Pysek, P., Vila, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramut, R.A.; Pusz, W. Fungi complicit in oak powdery mildew infection in the Oława Forest District. Acta Mycol. 2023, 58, 166060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pangga, I.B.; Hanan, J.; Chakraborty, S. Pathogen dynamics in a crop canopy and their evolution under changing climate. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, P.; Tedersoo, L.; Crowther, T.W.; Wang, B.; Shi, Y.; Kuang, L.; Li, T.; Wu, M.; Liu, M.; Luan, L.; et al. Global diversity and biogeography of potential phytopathogenic fungi in a changing world. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Santini, A.; Ghelardini, L.; De Pace, C.; Desprez-Loustau, M.L.; Capretti, P.; Chandelier, A.; Cech, T.; Chira, D.; Diamandis, S.; Gaitniekis, T.; et al. Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytologist 2013, 197, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Turczański, K.; Bełka, M.; Spychalski, M.; Kukawka, R.; Prasad, R.; Smiglak, M. Resistance inducers for the protection of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) seedlings against powdery mildew Erysiphe alphitoides. Plants 2023, 12, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Georgescu, C.C.; Petrescu, M.; Ene, M.; Ștefănescu, M.; Miron, V. Bolile și dăunătorii pădurilor, Biologie și combatere, Vol. I Bolile [Forest Diseases and Pests, Biology and Control, Vol. I Diseases]; State Agro-forestry Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  18. El-Sayed, A.; Kamel, M. Climatic changes and their role in emergence and re-emergence of diseases. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 22336–22352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jung, T.; Orlikowski, L.; Henricot, B.; Abad-Campos, P.; Aday, A.G.; Aguín Casal, O.; Bakonyi, J.; Cassiola, S.O. Widespread Phytophthora infestations in European nurseries put forest, semi-natural and horticultural ecosystems at high risk of Phytophthora diseases. For. Pathol. 2016, 46, 134–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Şimonca, V.; Oroian, I.; Chira, D.; Tăut, I. Methods for Quantification of the Decline Phenomenon and Determination of the Vulnerability Degree for the Oak Stands in Northwestern Transylvania, Romania. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo 2017, 45, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Popa, I.; Leca, S.; Crăciunescu, A.; Sidor, C.; Badea, O. Dendroclimatic response variability of Quercus species in the Romanian intensive forest monitoring network. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo 2013, 41, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sonesson, K.; Drobyshev, I. Recent advances on oak decline in southern Sweden. Ecol. Bull. 2010, 53, 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jankowiak, R.; Stepniewska, H.; Bilański, P.; Kolařík, M. Occurrence of Phytophthora plurivora and other Phytophthora sp. in oaks forests of southern Poland and their association with site conditions and the health status of trees. Folia Microbiol. 2014, 59, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Keca, N.; Koufakis, I.; Dietershagen, J.; Nowakowska, J.A.; Oszako, T. European oak decline phenomenon in relation to climatic changes. Folia For. Pol. 2016, 58, 170–177. [Google Scholar]
  25. Olenici, N. Identificarea factorilor dăunători care afectează culturile forestiere–principii generale și un studiu de caz [Identification of pests affecting forest crops–general principles and a case study]. Bucov. For. 2021, 21, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chira, F.; Mantale, C.; Enoiu, I.; Chira, D. Tratamente complexe la puieții forestieri de rășinoase din pepiniere [Complex treatments of softwood forest saplings in nurseries.]. Rev. Silvic. Cineg. 2019, 24, 53. [Google Scholar]
  27. Haase, D.L.; Pike, C.; Enebak, S.; Mackey, L.; Ma, Z.; Silva, C.; Warren, J. Forest nursery seedling production in the United States—Fiscal year 2020. Tree Plant Notes 2021, 64, 108–114. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hessenauer, P.; Feau, N.; Gill, U.; Schwessinger, B.; Brar, G.S.; Hamelin, R.C. Evolution and adaptation of forest and crop pathogens in the Anthropocene. Phytopathology 2021, 111, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lurwanu, Y.; Wang, Y.P.; Abdul, W.; Zhan, J.; Yang, L.N. Temperature-mediated plasticity regulates the adaptation of Phytophthora infestans to azoxystrobin fungicide. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Desprez-Loustau, M.L.; Hamelin, F.; Marçais, B. The ecological and evolutionary trajectory of oak powdery mildew in Europe. In Wildlife Disease Ecology: Linking Theory to Data and Application (Ecological Reviews); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 429–457. [Google Scholar]
  31. Buras, A.; Rammig, A.; Zang, C.S. Quantifying impacts of the drought 2018 on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003. Biogeosci. Discuss. 2020, 17, 1655–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Calvo, P.; Nelson, L.; Kloepper, J.W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tăut, I.; Moldovan, M. Controlul făinării frunzelor de gorun în culturi de pepinieră [Control of sessile oak leaf powdery mildew in nursery crops]. Rev. de Silvic. si Cinegetică 2022, XXVII, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  34. Essling, M.; McKay, S.; Petrie, P.R. Fungicide Programs Used to Manage Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe necator) in Australian Vineyards. Crop Prot. 2021, 139, 105369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Berrie, A.; Xu, X. Developing Biopesticide-Based Programmes for Managing Powdery Mildew in Protected Strawberries in the UK. Crop Prot. 2021, 149, 105766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. PN19070205 (BIOSERV Core Program) 2019–2022. INCDS “Marin Dracea”. Available online: https://icas.ro/programs-and-projects/national-programs-and-projects/bioserv-core-program-2019-2022/?lang=en (accessed on 27 July 2024).
  37. Kebert, M.; Kostić, S.; Zlatković, M.; Stojnic, S.; Čapelja, E.; Zorić, M.; Kiprovski, B.; Budakov, D.; Orlović, S. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Modulate Biochemical Response against Powdery Mildew Disease in Quercus robur L. Forests 2022, 13, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bobeș, I. Atlas de fitopatologie și protecția agroecosistemelor [Atlas of Phytopathology and Protection of Agroecosystems]; Ceres Ed.: Bucharest, Romania, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  39. Constantinescu, O. Metode și tehnici în micologie [Methods and Techniques in Mycology]; Ceres Ed.: Bucharest, Romania, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  40. Atak, A. Determination of downy mildew and powdery mildew resistance of some grape cultivars. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2017, 38, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aldentun, Y. Life cycle inventory of forest seedling production—From seed to regeneration site. J. Clean. Prod. 2002, 10, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mataruga, M.; Cvjetković, B.; De Cuyper, B.; Aneva, I.; Zhelev, P.; Cudlín, P.; Metslaid, M.; Kankaanhuhta, V.; Collet, C.; Annighofer, P.; et al. Monitoring and control of forest seedling quality in Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 546, 121308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. La Porta, N.; Capretti, P.; Thomsen, I.M.; Kasanen, R.; Hietala, A.M.; Von Weissenberg, K. Forest pathogens with higher damage potential due to climate change in Europe. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 30, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Green, S.; Cooke, D.E.; Dunn, M.; Barwell, L.; Purse, B.; Chapman, D.S.; Valatin, G.; Schlenzig, A.; Barbrook, J.; Pettitt, T.; et al. PHYTO-THREATS: Addressing threats to UK forests and woodlands from Phytophthora; identifying risks of spread in trade and methods for mitigation. Forests 2021, 12, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Skwarek-Fadecka, M.; Patykowski, J.; Nawrocka, J.; Szymczak, K.; Kaźmierczak, A.; Wielanek, M.; Ruszkiewicz-Michalska, M. Biochemical changes in Quercus robur L. leaves after Erysiphe alphitoides infection. For. Pathol. 2022, 52, e12756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hewitt, H.G. Conidial germination in Microsphaera alphitoides. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1974, 63, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pap, P.; Ranković, B.; Masirevic, S. Effect of temperature, relative humidity and light on conidial germination of oak powdery mildew (Microsphaera alphitoides Griff. et Maubl.) under controlled conditions. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2013, 65, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karadžić, D.; Milijašević, T. Najčešće “pepelnice“našumskim drvenastim vrstama i njihov značaj [The most common “powdery mildews” of forest woody species and their significance]. Glas. Šumarskog Fak. 2005, 91, 9–29. [Google Scholar]
  49. Glavaš, M. Zaštita hrastovih sastojina od pepelnice (Microsphaera alphitoides Griff. et Maubl.) [Protection of oak stands against powdery mildew (Microsphaera alphitoides Griff. et Maubl.)]. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2011, 32, 205–210. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rockström, J.; Williams, J.; Daily, G.; Noble, A.; Matthews, N.; Gordon, L.; Wetterstrand, H.; DeClerck, F.; Shah, M.; Steduto, P.; et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 2017, 46, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gikas, G.D.; Parlakidis, P.; Mavropoulos, T.; Vryzas, Z. Particularities of fungicides and factors affecting their fate and removal efficacy: A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vielba-Fernández, A.; Polonio, Á.; Ruiz-Jiménez, L.; de Vicente, A.; Pérez-García, A.; Fernández-Ortuño, D. Fungicide resistance in powdery mildew fungi. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hanif, M.; Ashraf, Z.; Bashir, S.; Riaz, F.; Amanat, R.; Yousaf, N.; Sarwar, S. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi as Biofertilizers in Forestry. In Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Agriculture-New Insights; IntechOpen: Vienna, Austria, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Argiroff, W.A.; Zak, D.R.; Upchurch, R.A.; Pellitier, P.T.; Belke, J.P. Fungal community composition and genetic potential regulate fine root decay in northern temperate forests. Mol. Ecol. 2023, 32, 2005–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Almeida, J.P.; Menichetti, L.; Ekblad, A.; Rosenstock, N.P.; Wallander, H. Phosphorus regulates ectomycorrhizal fungi biomass production in a Norway spruce forest. Biogeosciences 2023, 20, 1443–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Calderone, F.; Vitale, A.; Panebianco, S.; Lombardo, M.F.; Cirvilleri, G. COS-OGA Applications in Organic Vineyard Manage Major Airborne Diseases and Maintain Postharvest Quality of Wine Grapes. Plants 2022, 11, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Opalski, K.S.; Tresch, S.; Kogel, K.-H.; Grossmann, K.; Köhle, H.; Hückelhoven, R. Metrafenone: Studies on the mode of action of a novel cereal powdery mildew fungicide. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Selby, T.P.; Sternberg, C.G.; Bereznak, J.F.; Coats, R.A.; Marshall, E.A. The Discovery of Proquinazid: A New and Potent Powdery Mildew Control Agent. In Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals VII; Lyga, J.W., Theodoridis, G., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; Volume 948, pp. 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rantsiou, K.; Giacosa, S.; Pugliese, M.; Englezos, V.; Ferrocino, I.; Río Segade, S.; Monchiero, M.; Gribaudo, I.; Gambino, G.; Gullino, M.L.; et al. Impact of chemical and alternative fungicides applied to grapevine cv Nebbiolo on microbial ecology and chemical-physical grape characteristics at harvest. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. La Torre, A.; Iovino, V.; Caradonia, F. Copper in plant protection: Current situation and prospects. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 201–236. [Google Scholar]
  61. Marçais, B.; Piou, D.; Dezette, D.; Desprez-Loustau, M.L. Can oak powdery mildew severity be explained by indirect effects of climate on the composition of the Erysiphe pathogenic complex? Phytopathology 2017, 107, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Buraczyk, W.; Żybura, H.; Ostaszewska, E.; Studnicki, M.; Aleksandrowicz−Trzcińska, M. Zastosowanie biostymulatorów w hodowli I ochronie sadzonek dębu szypułkowego (Quercus robur L.) w gruntowej szkółce leśnej. [Application of biostimulators in the growth and protection of pedunculated oak (Quercus robur L.) seedlings in bare-root nursery]. Sylwan 2020, 164, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tkaczyk, M.; Szmidla, H.; Sikora, K. The use of biostimulants containing Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis algal extract in the cultivation and protection of English oak Quercus robur L. seedlings in forest nurseries. Sylwan 2022, 166, 244–252. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Location of the experimental surfaces (source: Google Earth).
Figure 1. Location of the experimental surfaces (source: Google Earth).
Microbiolres 15 00097 g001
Figure 2. Details of experimental surfaces (above satellite location, below ground details): (a), Valea Iușului nursery, (b), Voivodeni nursery, (source: Google Earth and original photo).
Figure 2. Details of experimental surfaces (above satellite location, below ground details): (a), Valea Iușului nursery, (b), Voivodeni nursery, (source: Google Earth and original photo).
Microbiolres 15 00097 g002
Figure 3. Data logger device.
Figure 3. Data logger device.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g003
Figure 4. OPM disease severity by daily air temperature and humidity in the Valea Iușului nursery (ua—uninfected, w—low: 1–24%, m—medium 25–74%, and h—high over 75%; the percentages mean the degree of mycelial coverage of the leaves).
Figure 4. OPM disease severity by daily air temperature and humidity in the Valea Iușului nursery (ua—uninfected, w—low: 1–24%, m—medium 25–74%, and h—high over 75%; the percentages mean the degree of mycelial coverage of the leaves).
Microbiolres 15 00097 g004
Figure 5. Establishing disease severity and the effectiveness of treatments by variant in the Valea Iușului nursery.
Figure 5. Establishing disease severity and the effectiveness of treatments by variant in the Valea Iușului nursery.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g005
Figure 6. Uninfected sessile oak seedlings during May 2023 in the Valea Iușului Nursery.
Figure 6. Uninfected sessile oak seedlings during May 2023 in the Valea Iușului Nursery.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g006
Figure 7. Medium and high affected seedlings during late August 2023 in the Valea Iușului Nursery.
Figure 7. Medium and high affected seedlings during late August 2023 in the Valea Iușului Nursery.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g007
Figure 8. OPM disease severity by daily air temperature and humidity, in the Voivodeni nursery (ua—uninfected, w—low: 1–24%, m—medium 25–74%, and h—high over 75%; the percentages mean the degree of mycelial coverage of the leaves).
Figure 8. OPM disease severity by daily air temperature and humidity, in the Voivodeni nursery (ua—uninfected, w—low: 1–24%, m—medium 25–74%, and h—high over 75%; the percentages mean the degree of mycelial coverage of the leaves).
Microbiolres 15 00097 g008
Figure 9. Establishing disease severity and the effectiveness of treatments by variant in the Voivodeni nursery.
Figure 9. Establishing disease severity and the effectiveness of treatments by variant in the Voivodeni nursery.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g009
Figure 10. Uninfected oak seedlings during May 2023 in the Voivodeni nursery.
Figure 10. Uninfected oak seedlings during May 2023 in the Voivodeni nursery.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g010
Figure 11. Medium and high affected oak seedlings at the beginning of August 2023 in the Voivodeni nursery.
Figure 11. Medium and high affected oak seedlings at the beginning of August 2023 in the Voivodeni nursery.
Microbiolres 15 00097 g011
Table 1. Geographical characterization elements of the experimental surfaces.
Table 1. Geographical characterization elements of the experimental surfaces.
No.NameCoordinatesAltitude (masl)
Latitude (N)Longitude (E)
1Valea Iușului Nursery46.947683°24.243044°467
2Voivodeni nursery46.725072°24.605525°378
Table 2. Analysis of variance and the significance of the disease severity in treated variants on sessile oak culture from the Valea Iușului nursery.
Table 2. Analysis of variance and the significance of the disease severity in treated variants on sessile oak culture from the Valea Iușului nursery.
Source of VariationSSdfMSFp-ValueF Crit
Rows17.7553.556.850.0022.90
Columns8.7132.905.610.0093.29
Error7.77150.52
Total34.2323
VariantsV6V4V5V3V1V2
VariantsMeans4.253.593.032.812.371.83
V64.25 1.10 *1.72 **1.77 **2.00 **2.79 **
V43.59 0.620.670.901.69 **
V53.03 0.050.281.07 *
V32.81 0.231.02
V12.37 0.79
V21.83
DL 5%—1.068, DL 1%—1.675, DL 0.1%—2.854. * significant differences at the 0.05 level; ** significant differences at the 0.01 level.
Table 3. Analysis of variance on the effectiveness of treatments determined using the Abbot formula in sessile oak culture from the Valea Iușului nursery.
Table 3. Analysis of variance on the effectiveness of treatments determined using the Abbot formula in sessile oak culture from the Valea Iușului nursery.
Source of VariationSSdfMSFp-ValueF Crit
Rows317.35563.476.940.0015312.90
Columns257.5385.839.380.0009743.28
Error137.15159.14
Total711.9823
VariantsV2V1V3V5V4V6
VariantsMeans92.0189.9888.9587.1985.3381.95
V292.01 3.193.774.146.61 *11.80 **
V189.98 0.580.953.428.61 **
V388.95 0.372.848.03 **
V587.19 2.477.66 **
V485.33 5.19
V681.95
DL 5%—4.488, DL 1%—7.039, DL 0.1%—11.992. * significant differences at the 0.05 level; ** significant differences at the 0.01 level.
Table 4. Analysis of variance on the disease severity in treated variants on oak culture from the Voivodeni nursery.
Table 4. Analysis of variance on the disease severity in treated variants on oak culture from the Voivodeni nursery.
Source of VariationSSdfMSFp-ValueF Crit
Rows417.47583.4913.960.0000342.90
Columns228.27376.0912.720.0002123.29
Error89.69155.98
Total735.4423
VariantsV6V4V5V1V3V2
VariantsMeans13.411.8111.214.213.93.64
V613.40 1.592.199.19 **9.5 **9.76 ***
V411.81 0.67.6 **7.91 **8.17 **
V511.21 77.31 **7.57 **
V14.21 0.310.57
V33.90 0.26
V23.64
DL 5%—3.629, DL 1%—5.692, DL 0.1%—9.697. ** significant differences at the 0.01 level; *** significant differences at the 0.001 level.
Table 5. Analysis of variance on the effectiveness of treatments determined using the Abbot formula in oak culture from the Voivodeni nursery.
Table 5. Analysis of variance on the effectiveness of treatments determined using the Abbot formula in oak culture from the Voivodeni nursery.
Source of VariationSSdfMSFp-ValueF Crit
Rows3972.085794.4262.661.62378 × 10−92.90
Columns140.35346.783.690.0359429833.29
Error190.161512.68
Total4302.5923
VariantsV2V3V1V5V4V6
VariantsMeans88.7887.0486.8866.5861.5758.7
V288.78 1.741.9022.20 ***27.21 ***30.08 ***
V387.04 0.1620.46 ***25.47 ***28.34 ***
V186.88 20.3 ***25.31 ***28.18 ***
V566.58 5.017.88 *
V461.57 2.87
V658.7
DL 5%—5.285, DL 1%—8.288, DL 0.1%—14.120. * significant differences at the 0.05 level; *** significant differences at the 0.001 level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tăut, I.; Moldovan, M.; Șimonca, V.; Varga, M.I.; Rob, M.; Chira, F.; Chira, D. Control of Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides Present in Forest Crops in Current Climatic Conditions. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 15, 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030097

AMA Style

Tăut I, Moldovan M, Șimonca V, Varga MI, Rob M, Chira F, Chira D. Control of Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides Present in Forest Crops in Current Climatic Conditions. Microbiology Research. 2024; 15(3):1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tăut, Ioan, Mircea Moldovan, Vasile Șimonca, Mircea Ioan Varga, Marinel Rob, Florentina Chira, and Dănuț Chira. 2024. "Control of Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides Present in Forest Crops in Current Climatic Conditions" Microbiology Research 15, no. 3: 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030097

APA Style

Tăut, I., Moldovan, M., Șimonca, V., Varga, M. I., Rob, M., Chira, F., & Chira, D. (2024). Control of Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides Present in Forest Crops in Current Climatic Conditions. Microbiology Research, 15(3), 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030097

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop