Next Article in Journal
Geobacter grbiciae—A New Electron Donor in the Formation of Co-Cultures via Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer
Previous Article in Journal
Phaeohyphomycosis: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Environmental Water Sources from Southern Chile: A Potential Threat to Human Health

by
Matías Jofré Bartholin
1,
Boris Barrera Vega
2,3 and
Liliana Berrocal Silva
1,*
1
Centro de Investigación en Biomedicina (CIBMED), Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago 7501015, Chile
2
Escuela de Tecnología Médica, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Santiago 7501015, Chile
3
Laboratorio de Microbiología, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7501015, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microbiol. Res. 2023, 14(4), 1764-1773; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040121
Submission received: 9 September 2023 / Revised: 27 October 2023 / Accepted: 29 October 2023 / Published: 1 November 2023

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global issue affecting public and animal health. The overuse of antibiotics in human health, animal production, agriculture, and aquaculture has led to the selection of antibiotic-resistant strains, particularly in Gram-negative bacteria. Mutations and horizontal gene transfer play a significant role in the development of antimicrobial resistance, leading to the reduced efficacy of current antibiotics. Today, AMR in bacteria and antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) are increasingly recognized in multiple environmental sources, including recreational and irrigation waters. This study aims to identify Gram-negative bacteria from surface aquatic reservoirs in southern Chile and assess their susceptibility to clinically relevant antibiotics. Water samples were collected from four lakes, five rivers, one waterfall, and one watershed in southern Chile to isolate environmental Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). API-20E and MALDI–TOF were employed for bacterial identification. Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion tests and multiplex PCR were performed to determine their susceptibility profile. A total of 26 GNB strains were isolated from environmental water samples, predominantly belonging to the Pseudomonas (n = 9) and Acinetobacter (n = 7) genera. Among these strains, 96.2% were resistant to ampicillin and cefazoline, while 26.9% and 34.6% showed resistance to ceftazidime and cefepime, respectively. Additionally, 38.5% exhibited resistance to colistin. Two Enterobacter cloacae strains obtained from Cachapoal River (sixth region) and Villarrica Lake (ninth region), respectively, presented a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype and carried at least two extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes. Thus, antibiotic-resistant GNB and ARGs were found in natural water reservoirs, raising concerns about the dissemination of resistance determinants among potentially pathogenic bacteria in environmental microbial communities.

1. Introduction

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria poses a significant global threat to medical care, with the possibility of a future crisis where no antimicrobial drugs will be effective against multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Although both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria contribute to AMR, the prevalence of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), particularly Enterobacterales and non-fermenting bacteria, with resistance to antibiotics like β-lactams and carbapenems, has been increasingly observed in medical practice. These MDR strains are responsible for a subset of pathologies predominantly associated with hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) [1,2]. Critically important pathogens, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, demand the urgent development of novel therapeutic strategies [3].
The application of selective pressures, like administering antibiotics at defined concentrations, results in the death of a high percentage of sensitive bacteria. However, some bacteria thrive under these conditions by developing or acquiring resistance strategies encoded by genetic mechanisms, typically located in plasmids and other mobile genetic elements or within the chromosome [4,5]. Infections caused by multiresistant GNB have become an increasingly serious problem both in hospitals and the community. Up to 50% of human-pathogen bacteria may now be resistant to antibiotics commonly used in clinical practice, leading to a three-fold increase in mortality and the risk of complications for affected patients [6].
The lack of new antimicrobial drugs has resulted in the reintroduction of old antibiotics, such as colistin, as a last-resort therapy [7]. However, the continuous discovery of colistin-resistant genotypes among GNB strains in Chile and around the world [8,9,10] is raising concerns. Preserving the clinical efficacy of these last-resort antibiotics is crucial, given the limited therapeutic alternatives against MDR bacteria.
Growing evidence suggests that AMR may find its origin in the use of antibiotics like β-lactams, polymyxins, and others for livestock. These antibiotics are widely used in animal husbandry and farming, not only for their antimicrobial action against GNB but also for their growth-promoting properties [11,12,13].
Furthermore, environmental water sources serve as significant reservoirs and transmission vehicles for pathogenic bacteria and antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs). Effluent from contaminated water treatment plants, containing residues like resistant bacterial cells, antibiotics, disinfectants, and ARGs are discharged into rivers, lakes, and other natural water sources [14,15]. Analyzing environmental waters has proven effective in studying pathogens with antibiotic resistance [16]. In Chile, a few studies have been conducted in this regard, with one of them reporting the presence of ARGs in bacteria isolated from rivers near water treatment plants and in wild bird feces. These findings highlight the dissemination potential of these waters and the presence of ARGs like β-lactamase genes (blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaKPC, and blaTEM) and other determinants of antibiotic resistance commonly used in human and animal medicine (quinolones, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides, among others) [15].
Internationally, colistin-resistance determinants associated with plasmids (mcr genes) have been identified in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from animals and subsequently found in multiresistant plasmids in various species of the Enterobacteriaceae family and other GNB from human samples, animal samples, and meat food samples for human consumption [9]. However, in Chile, there are limited reports on the contribution of environmental samples to the abundance and dissemination of these genes, underscoring the need to understand the resistance profile of environmental bacteria found in close proximity to humans [15,17]. Both in our country and globally, it is necessary to generate greater evidence that explores the contribution of environmental surface waters to the dissemination of AMR-harboring bacteria and ARGs.
In light of the above, the main aim of this study was to identify GNB in water sources of southern Chilean rivers and lakes with antibiotic-resistant profiles commonly observed in medical practice, and to detect the presence of ARGs associated with these resistance phenotypes which can be transferred to pathogenic bacteria. This research contributes to generating evidence that can guide recommendations on the prudent use of antibiotics and to design effective preventive strategies, addressing this crisis related to the treatment of infectious diseases in all relevant sectors, not solely in human health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 21 water samples were systematically collected in sterile 15 mL falcon tubes from four lakes, five rivers, one waterfall, and one watershed, covering the sixth to fourteenth regions located towards the south of the capital of Chile, during the daytime between the 5th and 20th of January 2021 (Figure 1 and Table 1), and then stored at 4 °C. These sampling sites supply water for different purposes including recreation, public use like bathing during the summer season, agriculture, and livestock activities. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, a total of 26 GNB strains were isolated from the 21 water samples initially collected.

2.2. Bacterial Isolation and Preservation

The collected water samples were cultured on blood agar plates (bioMérieux, Marcy-I’Etoile, France) to promote the recovery of any bacterial species. Subsequently, MacConkey agar plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for the selection and identification of GNB. The isolated bacterial colonies were characterized based on their ability to ferment lactose, consistency, and ease of growth. The selected bacteria were reisolated in the same medium and then inoculated into 1 mL of LB medium with glycerol (1:1) and stored at −80 °C for further genetic and phenotypic analysis.

2.3. Identification of GNB

To achieve bacterial identification, each strain was grown on MacConkey agar plates at 37 °C, and the colonies obtained were used to generate a bacterial suspension (MacFarland 0.5) in sterile saline solution, which was used to sow the API-20E galleries (bioMérieux). In all cases, a numerical code was obtained which was compared in the APIWEBTM software version number 1.4.1-3 of bioMérieux to achieve the identification of each strain. To corroborate the results obtained through the API galleries, the identification process was carried out using MALDI–TOF (VITEKR MS system, bioMérieux, France). For this, an isolated colony was used on the MacConkey agar plates, along with the E. coli ATCC8739 strain, used as a calibrator. This inoculum was allowed to dry, and then, 1 μL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix was added. Subsequently, spectrophotometric readings were taken, and the proteomic spectra were compared using the VITEK® MS Acquisition Station Software version number 1.10-203571250 to facilitate bacterial identification.

2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

The susceptibility of the identified environmental GNB strains to clinically relevant antibiotics was assessed using agar diffusion assays following the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [18]. The antibiotics tested were supplied by Mast Group (Bootle, UK) and included ampicillin (10 µg), cefazoline (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), and ciprofloxacin (5 µg). The susceptibility to colistin was also evaluated using the Sensi-Disc elution method [19]. Bacterial strains resistant to three or more antimicrobial categories were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR), following standardized criteria [20].

2.5. Molecular Detection of Antibiotic-Resistance Genes (ARGs)

Strains exhibiting resistance phenotypes underwent multiplex PCR (mPCR) to detect the presence of different mobile colistin-resistance (mcr) alleles and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes. The mPCR reactions were carried out using specific primers for detecting the mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4, and mcr-5 alleles of the mcr genes, as well as the blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaKPC, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48 β-lactam resistance genes [21,22,23]. For this, 1 mL of an overnight bacterial culture was centrifuged, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was washed with sterile nuclease-free water. Heat shock was then applied to extract the total DNA from the bacteria. Each reaction tube included 12.5 µL of Dream Taq Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 5.5 µL of sterile nuclease-free water, 2 µL of tempering obtained in the previous step, and 0.5 µL of each primer, until obtaining a final volume of 25 µL. Then, the tubes were incubated in a DLAB TC1000s thermocycler, where they were subjected to 1 cycle of denaturation at 94 °C for 15 min followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, hybridization at 55 °C for 90 s, elongation at 72 °C for 60 s, and a final elongation cycle of 10 min at 72 °C. The samples obtained from the amplification process were visualized using electrophoresis using 2.5% agarose gels stained with SafeView Plus (FermeloBiotec, Santiago, Chile).

3. Results

3.1. Distribution and Prevalence of GNB from Environmental Surface Waters

Water samples were systematically collected from various environmental reservoirs, including rivers and lakes, distributed from the sixth to the fourteenth regions of Chile (Figure 1). The sampling areas associated with the sixth region were irrigations and tailing channels near to the Cachapoal River, where strains 1.4 to 7.2 were isolated. Strains 12.1 to 15.2 corresponded to the Bio-Bío and Ñuble rivers in the eighth region. Strains 10.1, 10.2, and 17.1 to 19.3 were obtained from the Caburgua, Calafquén, and Villarrica lakes, respectively, located in the ninth region. Strain 9.1 and 9.2 were obtained from the watershed near to Coñaripe River in the fourteenth region. A total of 26 bacterial strains were isolated from these water samples (Table 1). The identified GNB bacteria mainly belonged to non-fermenting bacilli and the Enterobacterales order. The most frequently observed species were Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselli (34.6%), Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticus (27%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (11.5%). Strains of Enterobacter cloacae, Rhanella aquatilis, Serratia marcescens, and Pantoea agglomerans, representing the Enterobacterales order, were also identified (Table 2).

3.2. Resistance Profile of Environmental GNB

To determine the susceptibility profiles of the isolated strains to clinically relevant antibiotics, their resistance to ampicillin, cefazolin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and colistin was evaluated. The majority of the GNB isolates (96.2%) showed resistance to ampicillin and cefazoline, both β-lactam antibiotics. Resistance to other cephalosporins, ceftazidime and cefepime, was observed in 26.9% and 34.6% of the strains, respectively. A small number of isolates were resistant to carbapenems, with two strains showing resistance to imipenem (7.7%) and four strains showing resistance to meropenem (15.4%). Regarding fluoroquinolones, 11.5% of the isolates exhibited resistance to ciprofloxacin. Notably, 38.5% of the isolates (10/26) showed resistance to colistin (Table 3).
Ruling out the intrinsic resistance observed in most of the environmental isolates (AMP, CFZ), 73.1% of the strains (19/26) were found to be non-susceptible (resistant or intermediate) to at least one antibiotic. Furthermore, we found that two of the studied strains (7.7%) exhibited an MDR phenotype according to standardized criteria [20].

3.3. Colistin and β-Lactam Resistance Genes in Environmental GNB

To investigate certain transferable genetic determinants underlying colistin and β-lactam resistance, the presence of some ARGs was evaluated. Several mcr alleles (mcr-1 to mcr-5), responsible for plasmid-mediated mobile colistin resistance, were searched through the use of mPCR. However, none of the evaluated strains were found to carry those alleles. To correlate the resistance phenotypes against ceftazidime and cefepime with the presence of mobile elements in GNB, mPCR was conducted to identify the blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M genes, encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). Only 15% of the tested isolates (3.2, 9.1, 13.1, and 19.1) were found to carry ESBL genes. The blaCTX-M gene was detected in strain 13.1, which corresponds to Pantoea agglomerans. Strain 9.1, identified as Acinetobacter sp., carried the blaTEM gene. Additionally, strains 3.2 and 19.1, both identified as Enterobacter cloacae, carried both the blaTEM and blaCTX-M genes (Table 2). Likewise, mPCR was performed on imipenem- and meropenem-resistant isolates to identify the blaKPC, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48 genes encoding carbapenemases, but none were found.

4. Discussion

The presented descriptive study focused on the prevalence of GNB in environmental waters in Chile and their susceptibility to clinically relevant antibiotics. The bacterial populations in 21 surface water samples from Chilean rivers and lakes were dominated by Gamma-proteobacteria, with Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas, and some Enterobacterales as the main genera. This finding aligns with studies from other countries, where similar bacterial genera have been found in various aquatic environments [24]. However, unlike a previous study conducted by Díaz-Gavidia C. et al., 2021, in Chile [17], we did not find clinically relevant Enterobacterales such as E. coli, Citrobacter sp., and Klebsiella sp. These differences could be attributed to the geographic region of sampling and the seasonal variation, since in our study all samples were taken in the summer, in high temperatures and low rain conditions. Whereas, in the study conducted by Díaz-Gavidia C. et al. (2021), the samples were taken during the autumn and winter.
The non-fermenting bacteria Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Stenotrophomonas are opportunistic pathogens found in both humans and animals, capable of acquiring multiple resistance determinants such as β-lactamases or carbapenemases [25,26,27]. The combination of intrinsic and acquired resistance in these bacteria can lead to therapeutic failure [28,29]. Some species like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have been reported as MDR and even pandrug-resistant in clinical isolates [27,30,31], and are listed by the World Health Organization as important Gram-negative MDR bacteria that cause healthcare-associated infections [3]. Additionally, in this study, we found some Enterobacterales like Enterobacter cloacae, Rhanella aquatilis, Pantoea agglomerans, and Serratia marcescens, which can also cause infections in immunocompromised hosts [32,33,34,35]. Our finding of E. cloacae with an MDR profile in samples obtained from Villarrica Lake (ninth region) and Cachapoal River (sixth region) (Table 2) is concerning, as it can cause both healthcare-associated and community-acquired infections, such as urinary tract infections and bacteremia [36].
The current study revealed a high percentage of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics like ampicillin and first-generation cephalosporins, which is consistent with natural resistance found in environmental bacterial populations [26,37,38,39]. Resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins was also frequent, along with some resistance to carbapenems. Additionally, a portion of the isolates showed resistance to ciprofloxacin and colistin, although no alleles associated with mobile resistance were detected. Therefore, colistin resistance would be attributed to the presence of some intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms encoded at the chromosome level in these isolates [7]. Among the evaluated ARGs, our study found ESBL-coding genes (blaTEM and blaCTX-M) in some strains, indicating potential horizontal gene transfer between environmental and pathogenic bacteria. Consistent with this finding, ESBL-coding genes have been previously found in water sources and non-clinical environments in different countries around the world [1,14,40,41,42].
In Chile, recent studies have reported a high incidence of blaCTX-M in different environments such as in domestic and wild animals [43,44,45], vegetables, and water [17]. In addition, blaTEM has been found in rivers of the fourteenth region [15]. It is interesting to note that we found both blaTEM and blaCTX-M in Enterobacter cloacae and blaTEM in Acinetobacter sp., two antibiotic-resistant GNB with pathogenic potential and that are associated with healthcare settings. However, we detected blaCTX-M in Pantoea agglomerans, a frequent saprophytic bacterium found in a wide variety of environments that occasionally causes infections [35,46]. This finding suggests that in aquatic environments, ARGs could be transferred from environmental bacteria to potential pathogenic bacteria and vice versa through horizontal gene transfer mechanisms. Even if such genes have rarely been identified in bacteria of animal and environmental origin, they may sooner or later spread to this reservoir. Some studies indicate that these are promiscuous species in terms of the acquisition or transference of resistance determinants by means of plasmids and other mobile genetic elements [24,47]. Such transmission between environmental and clinically relevant bacteria could have implications for public health and require ongoing surveillance. Considering these findings, this study highlights the importance of a one health approach, recognizing the interconnection between human, animal, and environmental health. The presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and ARGs in rivers and lakes that supply water for various purposes, including recreation, agriculture, and public use, may pose risks to human and animal health. It is crucial to monitor and understand the dynamics of antibiotic resistance in environmental microbial communities, as has been suggested previously [1,47,48,49,50], to design effective preventive strategies as part of national action plans to address the spread of resistance.

5. Conclusions

We observed that 100% of the identified GNB in the water samples presented a resistance phenotype to at least one antibiotic, and in four of them ESBL-coding genes were found. Two of these strains, obtained from Cachapoal River and Villarrica Lake, identified as E. cloacae, showed an MDR phenotype and were positive for the blaTEM and blaCTX-M genes. In conclusion, this indicates that the studied aquatic environments are contaminated with antibiotic-resistant GNB, and the two aforementioned reservoirs are also contaminated with ARGs.
Overall, these findings highlight the need for continued research and proactive measures to address AMR in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Considering the impact of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and ARGs on human, animal, and ecological health, surveillance is crucial to determine contamination levels in aquatic environments. It is a matter of public concern to provide information about the transmission of ARGs among environmental bacteria, whose presence represents a risk to human health. Furthermore, this study reflects the reality of GNB and the distribution of certain ARGs during a specific period of the 2021 summer season in Chile, so it would be important to contrast this evidence with the current situation during the same summer period. This considers the speed at which bacterial species can evolve in relation to their environmental adaptation. Finally, it should be noted that, although the samples obtained are not representative of all aquatic areas in the country, it would be interesting to increase the sampling of environmental surface waters and the identification of GNB not only in the south but also in the central and northern regions of Chile, in order to correlate the presence of ARG-harboring species with different environmental factors and also relate them to lateral gene transfer events.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.B. and L.B.S.; methodology, M.J.B., B.B.V. and L.B.S.; investigation, M.J.B., B.B.V. and L.B.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.B. and L.B.S.; writing—review and editing, M.J.B., B.B.V. and L.B.S.; supervision, L.B.S.; project administration, M.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CAI-2020 to M.J.B. and L.B.S., a project that was financed by Universidad Finis Terrae.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Alondra Cárdenas and Martín Villavicencio for the sample collection from southern Chile and Arturo Chávez for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Despotovic, M.; De Nies, L.; Busi, S.B.; Wilmes, P. Reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance in the context of One Health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023, 73, 102291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fursova, N.K.; Kislichkina, A.A.; Khokhlova, O.E. Plasmids Carrying Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO, World Health Organization. Thirteenth General Programme of Work. 2019. Available online: www.iniscommunication.com (accessed on 5 June 2023).
  4. Von Wintersdorff, C.J.; Penders, J.; Van Niekerk, J.M.; Mills, N.D.; Majumder, S.; Van Alphen, L.B.; Savelkoul, P.H.M.; Wolffs, P.F.G. Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, G.; Thomsen, L.E.; Olsen, J.E. Antimicrobial-induced horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes in bacteria: A mini-review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kelly, A.M.; Mathema, B.; Larson, E.L. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the community: A scoping review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 50, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Olaitan, A.O.; Morand, S.; Rolain, J.M. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: Acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gutiérrez, C.; Zenis, J.; Legarraga, P.; Cabrera-Pardo, J.R.; García, P.; Bello-Toledo, H.; Opazo-Capurro, A.; González-Rocha, G. Genetic analysis of the first mcr-1 positive Escherichia coli isolate collected from an outpatient in Chile. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 23, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Yassin, A.K.; Butaye, P.; Kelly, P.; Gong, J.; Guo, W.; Li, J.; Li, M.; et al. Molecular detection of colistin resistance genes (mcr-1, mcr-2 and mcr-3) in nasal/oropharyngeal and anal/cloacal swabs from pigs and poultry. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hernando-Amado, S.; Coque, T.M.; Baquero, F.; Martínez, J.L. Defining and combating antibiotic resistance from one health and global health perspectives. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Surleac, M.; Czobor Barbu, I.; Paraschiv, S.; Popa, L.I.; Gheorghe, I.; Marutescu, L.; Popa, M.; Sarbu, I.; Talapan, D.; Nita, M.; et al. Whole genome sequencing snapshot of multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from hospitals and receiving wastewater treatment plants in Southern Romania. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mulchandani, R.; Wang, Y.; Gilbert, M.; Van Boeckel, T.P. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food-producing animals: 2020 to 2030. PLoS Glob. Public Health 2023, 3, e0001305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fresia, P.; Antelo, V.; Salazar, C.; Giménez, M.; D’Alessandro, B.; Afshinnekoo, E.; Mason, C.; Gonnet, G.H.; Iraola, G. Urban metagenomics uncover antibiotic resistance reservoirs in coastal beach and sewage waters. Microbiome 2019, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bueno, I.; Verdugo, C.; Jimenez-Lopez, O.; Alvarez, P.P.; Gonzalez-Rocha, G.; Lima, C.A.; Travis, D.A.; Wass, B.; Zhang, Q.; Ishii, S.; et al. Role of wastewater treatment plants on environmental abundance of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Chilean rivers. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 223, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amos, G.C.; Zhang, L.; Hawkey, P.M.; Gaze, W.H.; Wellington, E.M. Functional metagenomic analysis reveals rivers are a reservoir for diverse antibiotic resistance genes. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 171, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Díaz-Gavidia, C.; Barría, C.; Rivas, L.; García, P.; Alvarez, F.P.; González-Rocha, G.; Opazo-Capurro, A.; Araos, R.; Munita, J.M.; Cortes, S.; et al. Isolation of Ciprofloxacin and Ceftazidime Resistant Enterobacterales from Vegetables and River Water Is Strongly Associated with the Season and the Sample Type. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 604567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 32nd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jofré, M.; Barrera, B.; Silva, F.; Berrocal, L. Evaluation of sensidiscs elution for the determination of susceptibility to colistin in multi-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 2020, 37, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rebelo, A.R.; Bortolaia, V.; Kjelgaard, J.; Pedersen, S.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Hansen, I.M.; Guerra, B.; Malorny, B.; Borowiak, M.; Hammerl, J.A.; et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Euro Surveill. 2018, 23, 1560–7917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Salgado-Caxito, M.; Benavides, J.A.; Munita, J.M.; Rivas, L.; García, P.; Listoni, F.J.; Moreno-Switt, A.I.; Paes, A.C. Risk factors associated with faecal carriage of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli among dogs in Southeast Brazil. Prev. Vet. Med. 2021, 190, 105316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Poirel, L.; Berçot, B.; Millemann, Y.; Bonnin, R.A.; Pannaux, G.; Nordmann, P. Carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp. in cattle, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 523–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shin, H.; Kim, Y.; Han, S.; Hur, H.G. Resistome Study in Aquatic Environments. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 33, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mathlouthi, N.; Al-Bayssari, C.; Bakour, S.; Rolain, J.M.; Chouchani, C. Prevalence and emergence of carbapenemases-producing Gram-negative bacteria in Mediterranean basin. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 43, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lupo, A.; Haenni, M.; Madec, J.Y. Antimicrobial Resistance in Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Brooke, J.S. Advances in the Microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 34, e0003019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Breidenstein, E.B.; De la Fuente-Núñez, C.; Hancock, R.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: All roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, R.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Lei, L.; Yin, W.; Li, M.; Wu, C.; Walsh, T.R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. Presence of VIM-positive Pseudomonas species in chickens and their surrounding environment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00167-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fariñas, M.C.; Martínez-Martínez, L. Multiresistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: Enterobacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and other non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2013, 31, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qin, S.; Xiao, W.; Zhou, C.; Pu, Q.; Deng, X.; Lan, L.; Liang, H.; Song, X.; Wu, M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Remuzgo-Martínez, S.; Lázaro-Díez, M.; Mayer, C.; Aranzamendi-Zaldumbide, M.; Padilla, D.; Calvo, J.; Marco, F.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Icardo, J.M.; Otero, A.; et al. Biofilm Formation and Quorum-Sensing-Molecule Production by Clinical Isolates of Serratia liquefaciens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3306–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koczura, R.; Mokracka, J.; Makowska, N. Environmental Isolate of Rahnella aquatilis Harbors Class 1 Integron. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, W.J.; Song, Y.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, M.J. Bacteremia due to Rahnella aquatilis in a Patient with a Chemoport. Infect. Chemother. 2019, 51, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guevarra, R.B.; Magez, S.; Peeters, E.; Chung, M.S.; Kim, K.H.; Radwanska, M. Comprehensive genomic analysis reveals virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes in Pantoea agglomerans KM1, a potential opportunistic pathogen. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0239792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. De Oliveira DM, P.; Forde, B.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Harris PN, A.; Schembri, M.A.; Beatson, S.A.; Paterson, D.L.; Walker, M.J. Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00181-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ruppé, É.; Woerther, P.L.; Barbier, F. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacilli. Ann. Intensive Care 2015, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stachurová, T.; Piková, H.; Bartas, M.; Semerád, J.; Svobodová, K.; Malachová, K. Beta-lactam resistance development during the treatment processes of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Laborda, P.; Hernando-Amado, S.; Martínez, J.L.; Sanz-García, F. Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2022, 1386, 117–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Said, B.L.; Jouini, A.; Klibi, N.; Dziri, R.; Alonso, C.A.; Boudabous, A.; Ben Slama, K.; Torres, C. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in vegetables, soil and water of the farm environment in Tunisia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 203, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caltagirone, M.; Nucleo, E.; Spalla, M.; Zara, F.; Novazzi, F.; Marchetti, V.M.; Piazza, A.; Bitar, I.; De Cicco, M.; Paolucci, S.; et al. Occurrence of extended spectrum β-lactamases, KPC-type, and MCR-1.2-producing Enterobacteriaceae from wells, river water, and wastewater treatment plants in Oltrepò Pavese area, northern Italy. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marcelino, V.R.; Wille, M.; Hurt, A.C.; González-Acuña, D.; Klaassen, M.; Schlub, T.E.; Eden, J.-S.; Shi, M.; Iredell, J.R.; Sorrell, T.C.; et al. Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes. BMC Biol. 2019, 17, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Benavides, J.A.; Salgado-Caxito, M.; Opazo-Capurro, A.; González Muñoz, P.; Piñeiro, A.; Otto Medina, M.; Rivas, L.; Munita, J.; Millán, J. ESBL-producing Escherichia coli carrying CTX-M genes circulating among livestock, dogs, and wild mammals in small-scale farms of Central Chile. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cevidanes, A.; Esperón, F.; Cataldo SDi Neves, E.; Sallaberry-Pincheira, N.; Millán, J. Antimicrobial resistance genes in Andean foxes inhabiting anthropized landscapes in Central Chile. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 138247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sacristán, I.; Esperón, F.; Acuña, F.; Aguilar, E.; García, S.; López, M.J.; Cevidanes, A.; Neves, E.; Cabello, J.; Hidalgo-Hermoso, E.; et al. Antibiotic resistance genes as landscape anthropization indicators: Using a wild felid as sentinel in Chile. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Raphael, E.; Riley, L.W. Infections Caused by Antimicrobial Drug-Resistant Saprophytic Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Environment. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nappier, S.P.; Liguori, K.; Ichida, A.M.; Stewart, J.R.; Jones, K.R. Antibiotic Resistance in Recreational Waters: State of the Science. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 8034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Delgado-Gardea, M.C.; Tamez-Guerra, P.; Gomez-Flores, R.; Zavala-Díaz de la Serna, F.J.; Eroza-de la Vega, G.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V.; Pérez-Recoder, M.C.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; González-Horta, M.D.C.; Infante-Ramírez, R. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Surface Water in Bassaseachic Falls National Park, Mexico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2016, 13, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Franklin, A.M.; Brinkman, N.E.; Jahne, M.A.; Keely, S.P. Twenty-first century molecular methods for analyzing antimicrobial resistance in surface waters to support One Health assessments. J. Microbiol. Methods 2021, 184, 106174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hubeny, J.; Korzeniewska, E.; Ciesielski, S.; Płaza, G.; Harnisz, M. The Resistome of ESKAPEE Pathogens in Untreated and Treated Wastewater: A Polish Case Study. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of Chile. The regions included for sampling are marked in gray, and the sampling locations for each strain obtained are shown on the right.
Figure 1. Map of Chile. The regions included for sampling are marked in gray, and the sampling locations for each strain obtained are shown on the right.
Microbiolres 14 00121 g001
Table 1. Water samples origin, sampling location and selection of strains for identification by MALDI-TOF (n = 26).
Table 1. Water samples origin, sampling location and selection of strains for identification by MALDI-TOF (n = 26).
N° Correlative Water Sample Origin of SampleSampling LocationRegionLatitudeLongitudeGrowth in Blood AgarGrowth in MacConkey AgarRe-Isolated Strains Name
1Cachapoal riverDoñihue, Chile6th−34.217.836−70.892.976yesyes1.4–1.5
2Cachapoal riverDoñihue, Chile6th−34.214.474−70.896.846yesyes2.1–2.2
3Cachapoal riverDoñihue, Chile6th−34.213.610−70.906.275yesyes3.1–3.2
4Cachapoal riverDoñihue, Chile6th−34.229.342−70.938.954yesyes4.2
5Ñuble riverSan Nicolás, Chile8th−36.550.236−72.094.312yesnonenone
6Cachapoal riverDoñihue, Chile6th−34.211.686−70.873.574yesyes6.2
7Cachapoal riverDoñihue, Chile6th−34.209.675−70.861.052yesyes7.1–7.2
8Bellavista waterfallPucón, Chile9th−39.219.463−71.844.840nonenonenone
9Coñaripe watershedCoñaripe, Chile14th−39.582.347−72.025.156yesyes9.1–9.2
10Calafquen lakeLicán Ray, Chile9th−39.492.032−72.161.685yesyes10.2
11Voipir riverVillarrica, Chile9th−39.280.841−72.306.407yesnonenone
12Bío-Bío riverSan Carlos de Purén, Chile8th−37.599.828−72.274.804yesyes12.1
13Ñuble riverSan Nicolás, Chile8th−36.551.936−72.090.913yesyes13.1–13.2
14Bío-Bío riverSan Carlos de Purén, Chile8th−37.603.116−72.268.453yesyesnone
15Ñuble riverSan Nicolás, Chile8th−36.548.835−72.096.363yesyes15.1–15.2
16Mulchen-Bureo riverMulchén, Chile8th−37.719.543−72.260.213yesyesnone
17Caburgua lakeCaburgua, Chile9th−39.193.653−71.796.384yesyes17.1–17.2–17.3
18Calafquen lakeCoñaripe, Chile14th−39.565.623−72.019.635yesyes18.1–18.2
19Villarrica lakeVillarrica, Chile9th−39.275.456−72.227.820yesyes19.1–19.2–19.3
20Caburgua lagoon Pucón, Chile9th−39.240.204−71.831.649yesnonenone
21Villarrica lakeVillarrica, Chile9th−39.283.296−72.207.432yesnonenone
Table 2. Identification of GNB obtained from environmental surface waters and antibiotic susceptibility profile (n = 26).
Table 2. Identification of GNB obtained from environmental surface waters and antibiotic susceptibility profile (n = 26).
StrainIdentificationResistance ProfileBLEE Genes
1.4Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZ–FEP–COLNF
1.5Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZ–FEP–COLNF
2.1Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZ–COLNF
2.2Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZ–MEM–COLNF
3.1Comamonas aquaticaCIPNF
3.2Enterobacter cloacaeAMP–CFZ–CAZ–FEP–IPM–MEM–CIPblaCTXMblaTEM
4.2Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZ–COLNF
6.2Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZNF
7.1Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–COLNF
7.2Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–COLNF
9.1Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–CAZblaTEM
9.2Rahnella aquatilisAMP–CFZNF
10.2Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZNF
12.1Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaAMP–CFZ–CAZ–FEPNF
13.1Pantoea agglomeransAMP–CFZ–FEPblaCTXM
13.2Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZNF
15.1Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaAMP–CFZNF
15.2Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fluorescens/putida/mosselliAMP–CFZNF
17.1Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–CAZNF
17.2Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaAMP–CFZ–CAZNF
17.3Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–FEP–COLNF
18.1Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–CAZNF
18.2Acinetobacter pittii/calcoaceticus/haemolyticusAMP–CFZ–MEM–COLNF
19.1Enterobacter cloacaeAMP–CFZ–CAZ–FEP–IPM–MEM–CIPblaCTXMblaTEM
19.2Rahnella aquatilisAMP–CFZ–FEPNF
19.3Serratia marcescensAMP–CFZ–FEP–COLNF
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; CFZ, cefazoline; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; IMP, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; CIP, ciprofloxacin; COL, colistin; and NF, not found.
Table 3. Susceptibility profile of environmental isolates against clinically relevant antibiotics.
Table 3. Susceptibility profile of environmental isolates against clinically relevant antibiotics.
Resistance Phenotype% (Frequency)
Ampicillin96.2% (25/26)
Cefazoline96.2% (25/26)
Ceftazidime26.9% (7/26)
Cefepime34.6% (9/26)
Imipenem7.7% (2/26)
Meropenem15.4% (4/26)
Ciprofloxacin11.5% (3/26)
Colistin38.5% (10/26)
The susceptibility profile was obtained using agar diffusion assays. For colistin, Sensi-Disc elution tests were performed.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jofré Bartholin, M.; Barrera Vega, B.; Berrocal Silva, L. Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Environmental Water Sources from Southern Chile: A Potential Threat to Human Health. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 14, 1764-1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040121

AMA Style

Jofré Bartholin M, Barrera Vega B, Berrocal Silva L. Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Environmental Water Sources from Southern Chile: A Potential Threat to Human Health. Microbiology Research. 2023; 14(4):1764-1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jofré Bartholin, Matías, Boris Barrera Vega, and Liliana Berrocal Silva. 2023. "Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Environmental Water Sources from Southern Chile: A Potential Threat to Human Health" Microbiology Research 14, no. 4: 1764-1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040121

APA Style

Jofré Bartholin, M., Barrera Vega, B., & Berrocal Silva, L. (2023). Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Environmental Water Sources from Southern Chile: A Potential Threat to Human Health. Microbiology Research, 14(4), 1764-1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040121

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop