Next Article in Journal
Neurosyphilis with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Dementia Paralytica: Serial Clinical, Laboratory and Radiological Correlations in the 21st Century
Previous Article in Journal
Injectable Disease Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: Pattern of Medication Use and Clinical Effectiveness
 
 
Neurology International is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 3 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D

by
Ioannis E. Dagklis
1,*,
Vasilis H. Aletras
2,
Efthymia Tsantaki
3,
Anastasios Orologas
4 and
Dimitrios Niakas
1
1
Faculty of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patrasc
2
Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Laboratory of Hygiene and Social Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
4
First Department of Neurology, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Neurol. Int. 2016, 8(3), 6416; https://doi.org/10.4081/ni.2016.6416
Submission received: 16 January 2016 / Revised: 14 June 2016 / Accepted: 8 August 2016 / Published: 30 September 2016

Abstract

An ongoing debate on decision and cost-utility analyses is whether to use preferences of general public or patients. The aim of this study was to replicate the valuation procedure of the multi-attribute utility generic measure, 15D, using a sample of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and to assess its psychometric properties. Consecutive outpatient MS patients were recruited from two MS centers in Greece. The three-stage valuation procedure was applied and, with the use of elicited preference weights, an MS patients’ algorithm was developed. The original Finnish value set derived from healthy individuals was also used to calculate scores and a comparison between the two algorithms was made. A total of 64 MS patients were evaluated. The 15D scores obtained with the MS patients’ valuation algorithm were higher than the original one. The derived utilities differed significantly with respect to age, depressive symptoms, Expanded Disability Status Scale score and clinical form. MS patients indicated as most important domains mobility, mental functioning and vitality. Cronbach’s alpha was estimated 0.876 and correlations between relevant dimensions of the instruments were moderate to high. The 15D was generally feasible and reliable in patients with MS and the valuation system yielded acceptable psychometric properties.
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; 15D; Valuation; utilities; Health-related quality of life Multiple sclerosis; 15D; Valuation; utilities; Health-related quality of life

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dagklis, I.E.; Aletras, V.H.; Tsantaki, E.; Orologas, A.; Niakas, D. Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D. Neurol. Int. 2016, 8, 6416. https://doi.org/10.4081/ni.2016.6416

AMA Style

Dagklis IE, Aletras VH, Tsantaki E, Orologas A, Niakas D. Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D. Neurology International. 2016; 8(3):6416. https://doi.org/10.4081/ni.2016.6416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dagklis, Ioannis E., Vasilis H. Aletras, Efthymia Tsantaki, Anastasios Orologas, and Dimitrios Niakas. 2016. "Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D" Neurology International 8, no. 3: 6416. https://doi.org/10.4081/ni.2016.6416

APA Style

Dagklis, I. E., Aletras, V. H., Tsantaki, E., Orologas, A., & Niakas, D. (2016). Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D. Neurology International, 8(3), 6416. https://doi.org/10.4081/ni.2016.6416

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop