Next Article in Journal
Full life cycle analysis of market penetration of electricity based vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
An overview of electric and solar boats market in France
 
 
World Electric Vehicle Journal is published by MDPI from Volume 9 issue 1 (2018). Previous articles were published by The World Electric Vehicle Association (WEVA) and its member the European Association for e-Mobility (AVERE), the Electric Drive Transportation Association (EDTA), and the Electric Vehicle Association of Asia Pacific (EVAAP). They are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with AVERE.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Plug-In Vehicles (Plug-in Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles) Using Standard Dynamometer Protocols

by
Michael Duoba
*,
Henning Lohse-Busch
and
Eric Rask
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2012, 5(1), 196-209; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj5010196
Published: 30 March 2012

Abstract

New plug-in vehicles offer advantages in fuel saving and lower exhaust emissions by adding new advanced-technology powertrain components. With this new complexity come new challenges in characterizing these vehicles using standardized testing methods. Over the last several years, many testing experts have developed new methods for testing battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles (PHEVs). New instrumentation hardware and techniques are outlined in this paper. Metrics and calculation methods were developed to suit the plug-in aspect and operational nature of the vehicles. New BEV test methods were developed and validated using a 2012 Nissan Leaf BEV. Analysis of the results showed that efficiency and range determined from the old methods could be reliably reproduced with the new procedures and methods. Likewise new PHEV test procedures were validated using a 2012 Chevy Volt PHEV and an aftermarket PHEV-converted Prius. The results of the test program show that the end-of-test criterion presented as the “alternate” method in SAE J1711 is the robust choice to determine the transition from depleting to sustaining. The Utility Factor method of calculating final results worked well for both PHEVs. Sample post-processing calculations are shown for the urban-cycle testing. Various PHEV range definitions and fuel and electricity usage rates are given with and without utility factor weighting.
Keywords: efficiency; energy consumption; EV (electric vehicle); PHEV (plug in hybrid electric vehicle) efficiency; energy consumption; EV (electric vehicle); PHEV (plug in hybrid electric vehicle)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duoba, M.; Lohse-Busch, H.; Rask, E. Evaluating Plug-In Vehicles (Plug-in Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles) Using Standard Dynamometer Protocols. World Electr. Veh. J. 2012, 5, 196-209. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj5010196

AMA Style

Duoba M, Lohse-Busch H, Rask E. Evaluating Plug-In Vehicles (Plug-in Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles) Using Standard Dynamometer Protocols. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2012; 5(1):196-209. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj5010196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duoba, Michael, Henning Lohse-Busch, and Eric Rask. 2012. "Evaluating Plug-In Vehicles (Plug-in Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles) Using Standard Dynamometer Protocols" World Electric Vehicle Journal 5, no. 1: 196-209. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj5010196

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop