Wireless Power Transfer Positioning System with Wide Range Direction-Guided Based on Symmetrical Triple-U Auxiliary Pad

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic of the paper is interesting and the treatment is good, although the english in the text must be improved.

- In the introduction please improve the comparison of your technique with existing ones ;

- In the introduction highlight the novelty of your paper with comparison with literature;

- Please improve the last sentence of your introduction when you talk about new ascpects introduced by your technique; it is not very clear what they are;

- In the results please make a comparison of your alignment results with the ones of other techniques;

- Improve the conclusion , they are too short, please highlight the novelty of your technique and the quality of the results.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The topic of this manuscript is interesting and the literature review is in-detailed. However, it's quite hard to read. Therefore, some comments/points should be modified/improved before the accept for publication.

1. The Nomenclature should be added because some abbreviations are unclear/undefined, for example, DD, CP, Um, ...etc.

2. Figure 2 is "Power primary coil and auxiliary coil", however, only Power secondary coil shown in the figure. So, what is primary coil and auxiliary coil, respectively?

3. What are DD, U, CP to RC indicated in Figure 5? What in "M"? What are the meanings for the three figures in the middle of Figure 5?

4. Please make clearly defined for (a)~( f) in Figure 6.

5. What are UO₁, UO₂ and UO₃, repectively? What are X₁O₁Y₁, X₂O₂Y₂ and X₃O₃Y₃, respectively?

6. Please make more description of the Positioning Results.

7. Please give more clearly description of the main contribution of the manuscript in the introduction and conclusion. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors improved the paper according to the reviewer's comments.

The paper is suitable for publication .

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has been significantly revised based on the comments/suggestions. Therefore, I recommend this manuscript could be accepted for publication.