Next Article in Journal
Case Study: IBM Watson Analytics Cloud Platform as Analytics-as-a-Service System for Heart Failure Early Detection
Previous Article in Journal
The Importance of the Security Culture in SMEs as Regards the Correct Management of the Security of Their Assets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Information Is Not a Virus, and Other Consequences of Human Cognitive Limits
Article

Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions

by 1,2,3,4
1
Center for Complex Networks and Systems Research, Department of Informatics, Indiana University, 919 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
2
Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, 1900 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47406, USA
3
Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, 513 N Park Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
4
Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
Academic Editor: Emilio Ferrara
Future Internet 2016, 8(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8030031
Received: 16 February 2016 / Revised: 14 June 2016 / Accepted: 29 June 2016 / Published: 8 July 2016
What is the boundary between a vigorous argument and a breakdown of relations? What drives a group of individuals across it? Taking Wikipedia as a test case, we use a hidden Markov model to approximate the computational structure and social grammar of more than a decade of cooperation and conflict among its editors. Across a wide range of pages, we discover a bursty war/peace structure where the systems can become trapped, sometimes for months, in a computational subspace associated with significantly higher levels of conflict-tracking “revert” actions. Distinct patterns of behavior characterize the lower-conflict subspace, including tit-for-tat reversion. While a fraction of the transitions between these subspaces are associated with top-down actions taken by administrators, the effects are weak. Surprisingly, we find no statistical signal that transitions are associated with the appearance of particularly anti-social users, and only weak association with significant news events outside the system. These findings are consistent with transitions being driven by decentralized processes with no clear locus of control. Models of belief revision in the presence of a common resource for information-sharing predict the existence of two distinct phases: a disordered high-conflict phase, and a frozen phase with spontaneously-broken symmetry. The bistability we observe empirically may be a consequence of editor turn-over, which drives the system to a critical point between them. View Full-Text
Keywords: conflict; cooperation; finite-state machine; tit-for-tat; critical transition; hidden Markov model; memory; social norms; knowledge commons; Wikipedia conflict; cooperation; finite-state machine; tit-for-tat; critical transition; hidden Markov model; memory; social norms; knowledge commons; Wikipedia
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

DeDeo, S. Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions. Future Internet 2016, 8, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8030031

AMA Style

DeDeo S. Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions. Future Internet. 2016; 8(3):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8030031

Chicago/Turabian Style

DeDeo, Simon. 2016. "Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions" Future Internet 8, no. 3: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8030031

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop