Next Article in Journal
Raising Risk Awareness on the Adoption of Web 2.0 Technologies in Decision Making Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
Knowledge Representation for Prognosis of Health Status in Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Stuxnet: What Has Changed?
Previous Article in Special Issue
e-Health Cloud: Opportunities and Challenges
Article

Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment

University Hospital of North Norway, Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, Tromsø 35, 9038, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Future Internet 2012, 4(3), 688-699; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030688
Received: 19 April 2012 / Revised: 23 July 2012 / Accepted: 25 July 2012 / Published: 6 August 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future e-Health)
In Norway, it is a national goal to provide more patients with thrombolytic treatment. A referring hospital and a specialist hospital have implemented videoconferencing (VC) equipment to share knowledge and discuss stroke patients, regarding thrombolytic treatment. VC has only been used four times within the 19 months that the service has been available. The objective in this article is to increase the understanding of the contradiction between the need for knowledge-sharing through VC technology, as well as the reasons for low frequency of use when discussing stroke patients. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 professionals. The results illustrate how the technology per se is not the reason for the low frequency use. Health care is shaped by behavior, traditional rules, standards and division of labor. By using cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) as a framework, we illustrate the importance of understanding the historic way of performing an activity to be able to expand the treatment activity in the future. View Full-Text
Keywords: collaboration; medical discussions; knowledge-sharing; videoconference; activity theory; stroke collaboration; medical discussions; knowledge-sharing; videoconference; activity theory; stroke
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Nilsen, L.L.; Solvoll, T. Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment. Future Internet 2012, 4, 688-699. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030688

AMA Style

Nilsen LL, Solvoll T. Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment. Future Internet. 2012; 4(3):688-699. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030688

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nilsen, Line Lundvoll, and Terje Solvoll. 2012. "Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment" Future Internet 4, no. 3: 688-699. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030688

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop