Next Article in Journal
Development and Preclinical Evaluation of a Dual-Drug Implant for Long-Acting HIV Prevention and Contraception
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Polymeric Drug Delivery Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Three-Dimensionally Printed Paediatric Medicines: Formulation, Process, and Regulatory Considerations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing

CNRS, INSERM, Chemical and Biological Technologies for Health Group (UTCBS), Université Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(9), 1059; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091059
Submission received: 23 July 2026 / Accepted: 28 July 2026 / Published: 26 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing)
The context of 3D printing in the pharmaceutical sector and its significance
The history of three-dimensional (3D) printing dates back to the 1980s with the emergence of the first additive manufacturing technologies, including Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) and Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) [1,2,3]. In 1989, Scott Crump, co-founder of Stratasys, invented and patented FDM technology, which has since become one of the most widely adopted additive manufacturing techniques [4].
The rapid evolution of 3D printing has created unprecedented opportunities for the development of innovative medical devices and personalized drug delivery systems. Unlike conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing, which relies on large-scale production and standardized dosage forms, additive manufacturing enables the on-demand fabrication of patient-specific medicines in a flexible, cost-effective, and decentralized manner [5]. By depositing materials layer by layer according to a digital three-dimensional model, 3D printing allows the production of dosage forms with customized geometries, drug loads, and spatial distributions of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). This versatility enables the design of formulations with tailored drug-release profiles adapted to individual therapeutic requirements [6].
The ability to personalize medicines is particularly valuable in pediatric pharmacotherapy, where commercially available strengths are often unsuitable. Three-dimensional printing also facilitates the incorporation of multiple APIs into a single dosage form, simplifying complex treatment regimens, improving patient adherence, and supporting the transition toward precision medicine [7,8].
A landmark in pharmaceutical additive manufacturing was reached in August 2015 with the approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Spritam® (levetiracetam), developed by Aprecia Pharmaceuticals using ZipDose® technology. As the first FDA-approved 3D-printed medicine, Spritam® demonstrated the clinical feasibility of additive manufacturing by producing highly porous tablets that rapidly disintegrate with a small volume of water, thereby facilitating administration, particularly in pediatric and geriatric populations [9].
Despite these remarkable advances, several scientific, technological, and regulatory challenges continue to hinder the widespread implementation of pharmaceutical 3D printing. Further optimization is required regarding pharmaceutical-grade printable materials, printing hardware and software, process robustness, and the mechanical properties of printed dosage forms [10]. Industrial adoption will also depend on achieving consistent dose accuracy, batch-to-batch reproducibility, multi-material printing capability, increased production throughput, and full compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). In parallel, regulatory frameworks must continue to evolve to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of personalized medicines produced through additive manufacturing.
Nevertheless, 3D printing is expected to complement and in selected applications potentially replace conventional manufacturing methods, particularly for personalized therapies, pediatric medicines, orphan drugs and small-batch production. By enabling the manufacture of individualized dosage forms at the point of care or in specialized facilities, additive manufacturing represents a promising strategy for advancing personalized pharmacotherapy and improving patient outcomes [4].
Pharmaceutical 3D-printing technologies can generally be classified into four major categories: inkjet-based systems, nozzle deposition systems, electromagnetic systems and ultrasonic systems. Each category comprises several printing techniques that differ in their operating principles, printable materials and pharmaceutical applications [11,12].
An overview of the articles published in this Special Issue
This Special Issue, Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing, provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments illustrating the expanding role of additive manufacturing in pharmaceutical sciences. It comprises three review articles and eight original research papers that collectively demonstrate the versatility of 3D printing for personalized medicine and advanced biomedical applications.
The three review articles highlight complementary aspects of pharmaceutical 3D printing. The first review, by Samir I. Paipa-Jabre-Cantu et al. discusses the role of 3D printing in pharmaceutical manufacturing, with particular emphasis on personalized oral drug-delivery systems for the treatment of central nervous system disorders [13]. The remaining two reviews focus on pediatric applications from distinct but complementary perspectives. Krisztina Petrinca et al. examines the regulatory challenges associated with the development and implementation of 3D-printed medicines for children [14], whereas Veronica Ianno et al. reviews the technological advantages of Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) for manufacturing personalized pediatric dosage forms [15]. Together, these reviews provide a balanced overview of both the regulatory and technological issues that will shape the future of personalized pediatric medicines.
The eight original research papers further illustrate the breadth of pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of additive manufacturing. Alexandrina Druta et al. report the development of a porous palladium-functionalized silica catalyst produced by 3D printing for the synthesis of novel isatin derivatives with potential anticancer activity [16]. The increased porosity achieved through additive manufacturing enhances catalytic performance compared with conventionally manufactured structures.
Wouter Pannekoek et al. investigate medication handling practices in community pharmacies, nursing homes and a pediatric hospital [17]. The study reveals that a considerable proportion of medicines require manipulation before administration, emphasizing the potential value of 3D printing for producing individualized dosage forms better suited to patient needs.
Piyush Garg et al. present the development of 3D-printed contact lenses capable of sustained poly(vinyl alcohol) release for the treatment of dry eye disease, significantly extending therapeutic duration compared with conventional eye drops [18].
Farzana Khan Rony et al. compare Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with pressure-assisted micro syringe extrusion for manufacturing fenofibrate-loaded oral films [19]. Both techniques successfully produce formulations with high drug loading and markedly improved dissolution profiles.
Carlos Tamarit-Martínez et al. investigate antibiotic-loaded polylactic acid (PLA) implants fabricated by FDM for the prevention and treatment of prosthetic joint infections [20]. The authors demonstrate that print layer thickness is a key parameter influencing antibiotic release kinetics.
Martin Cseh et al. employ stereolithography to fabricate dissolvable microneedles containing dexamethasone [21]. The proposed manufacturing approach improves device stability while substantially reducing production time, representing an attractive strategy for personalized drug delivery.
Young-Jin Kim et al. evaluate the influence of mini-tablet geometry on the release kinetics of theophylline following FDM printing [22]. The results indicate that dose adjustment can be achieved by modifying tablet size and shape while maintaining controlled drug release, highlighting the flexibility of additive manufacturing for individualized therapies.
Finally, Jonas Lenhart et al. explore direct powder extrusion for the manufacture of loperamide tablets [23]. By adjusting drug loading and incorporating sorbitol as a plasticizer, the authors successfully modulate drug-release profiles while obtaining homogeneous amorphous solid dispersions, demonstrating the potential of this emerging technology for customized pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hull, C.W.; UVP Inc. Apparatus for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. U.S. Patent 4,575,330, 1 March 1986. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hull, C.W. Method for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. U.S. Patent 4,929,402, 29 May 1990. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hull, C.W.; Spence, S.T.; Albert, D.J.; Smalley, D.R.; Harlow, R.A.; Stinebaugh, P.; Tarnoff, H.L.; Nguyen, H.D.; Lewis, C.W.; Vorgitch, T.J.; et al. Method and Apparatus for Production of High Resolution Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. U.S. Patent 5,184,307, 2 February 1993. [Google Scholar]
  4. Crump, S.S.; Muir, A.E.P.D. Creating Three-Dimensional Objects. U.S. Patent 005121329A, 9 June 1992. [Google Scholar]
  5. Prasad, L.K.; Smyth, H. 3D Printing technologies for drug delivery: A review. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2016, 42, 1019–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Quodbach, J.; Bogdahn, M.; Breitkreutz, J.; Chamberlain, R.; Eggenreich, K.; Elia, A.G.; Gottschalk, N.; Gunkel-Grabole, G.; Hoffmann, L.; Kapote, D.; et al. Quality of FDM 3D Printed Medicines for Pediatrics: Considerations for Formulation Development, Filament Extrusion, Printing Process and Printer Design. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 2022, 56, 910–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Karalia, D.; Siamidi, A.; Karalis, V.; Vlachou, M. 3D-Printed Oral Dosage Forms: Mechanical Properties, Computational Approaches and Applications. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Kaval, B.; Kapkl, E.; Kaynak, M.S. Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview. Eur. J. Life Sci. 2022, 1, 70–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Spritam East Windsor, N.J. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals Company. 2015. Available online: https://aprecia.com/resources/press/fda-approves-the-first-3d-printed-drug-product/ (accessed on 16 April 2025).
  10. Preis, M.; Öblom, H. 3D-Printed Drugs for Children—Are We Ready Yet? AAPS PharmSciTech 2017, 18, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Shahrubudin, N.; Lee, T.C.; Ramlan, R. An overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications. Proc. Manuf. 2019, 35, 1286–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Varghese, R.; Sood, P.; Salvi, S.; Karsiya, J.; Kumar, D. 3D printing in the pharmaceutical sector: Advances and evidences. Sens. Int. 2022, 3, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Paipa-Jabre-Cantu, S.I.; Rodriguez-Salvador, M.; Castillo-Valdez, P.F. Revealing Three-Dimensional Printing Technology Advances for Oral Drug Delivery: Application to Central Nervous-System Related Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Petrinca, K.; Németh, Z.; Csóka, I.; Ambrus, R.; Jójárt-Laczkovich, O. Three-Dimensionally Printed Paediatric Medicines: Formulation, Process, and Regulatory Considerations. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Ianno, V.; Vurpillot, S.; Prillieux, S.; Espeau, P. Pediatric Formulations Developed by Extrusion-Based 3D Printing: From Past Discoveries to Future Prospects. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Druta, A.; Bouhmala, R.; Ragdi, T.; Luna, M.; Bañobre-López, M.; Masaguer, C.F.; Amorín, M.; Barbosa, S.; Taboada, P.; Coelho, A. Developing Heterogeneous Porous 3D-Printed SiO2-Pd-K2SiO3 Monolithic Catalyst via Surface MOF Growth and Pyrolysis for the Synthesis of Antitumoral Isatins. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Pannekoek, W.; van Kampen, E.E.M.; van Tienen, F.; van der Kuy, P.H.M.; Ruijgrok, E.J. Exploring Manipulated Prescribed Medicines for Novel Leads in 3D Printed Personalized Dosage Forms. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Garg, P.; Shokrollahi, P.; Darge, H.F.; Phan, C.-M.; Jones, L. 3D-Printed Contact Lenses to Release Polyvinyl Alcohol as a Therapeutic Agent for the Treatment of Dry Eyes. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Khan Rony, F.; Appiah, J.; Clay, A.A.D.; Ilias, S.; Azad, M.A. Evaluating Swellable Cross-Linked Biopolymer Impact on Ink Rheology and Mechanical Properties of Drug-Contained 3D-Printed Thin Film. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Tamarit-Martínez, C.; Bernat-Just, L.; Bueno-López, C.; Alambiaga-Caravaca, A.M.; Merino, V.; López-Castellano, A.; Rodilla, V. An Antibacterial-Loaded PLA 3D-Printed Model for Temporary Prosthesis in Arthroplasty Infections: Evaluation of the Impact of Layer Thickness on the Mechanical Strength of a Construct and Drug Release. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Cseh, M.; Katona, G.; Berkó, S.; Budai-Szűcs, M.; Csóka, I. A Stereolithography-Based Modified Spin-Casting Method for Faster Laboratory-Scale Production of Dexamethasone-Containing Dissolving Microneedle Arrays. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Kim, Y.-J.; Choi, Y.-R.; Kang, J.-H.; Park, Y.-S.; Kim, D.-W.; Park, C.W. Geometry-Driven Fabrication of Mini-Tablets via 3D Printing: Correlating Release Kinetics with Polyhedral Shapes. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Lenhart, J.; Pöstges, F.; Wagner, K.G.; Lunter, D.J. Evaluation of Printability of PVA-Based Tablets from Powder and Assessment of Critical Rheological Parameters. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Espeau, P. Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091059

AMA Style

Espeau P. Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2026; 18(9):1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Espeau, Philippe. 2026. "Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing" Pharmaceutics 18, no. 9: 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091059

APA Style

Espeau, P. (2026). Pharmaceutical Applications of 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics, 18(9), 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop