Metal–Organic Framework as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Classification of MOF-Based Contrast Agents
2.1. T1 Contrast Agents
2.2. T2 Contrast Agents
2.3. Dual-Mode Contrast Agents
2.4. Ratiometric Contrast Agents
2.5. 19F Contrast Agents
3. MOF-Based MRI Diagnosis and Atherosclerosis Treatment
4. MRI-Guided Antibacterial Treatment
5. MOF for MRI-Guided Cancer Treatment
6. Conclusions and Outlook
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MOFs | Metal–organic frameworks |
| MRI | Magnetic resonance imaging |
| SPIONs | Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles |
| DHTP | 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid |
| HSA | Human serum albumin |
| BBB | Blood–brain barrier |
| CDT | Chemodynamic therapy |
| CT | Computed tomography |
| FL | Fluorescence |
| NIR-II | Near-infrared II |
| NO | Nitric oxide |
| PAI | Photoacoustic imaging |
| PDT | Photo-dynamic therapy |
| PTT | Photothermal therapy |
| RT | Radiation therapy |
| US | Ultrasound |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscopy |
| TEM | Transmission electron microscopy |
| Gd/MPC | Cancer cell membrane camouflaged Gd-MOF |
| αPD-1 | Anti-PD-1 antibody |
| PCM | Phase change materials |
| KEGGs | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| GO | Gene ontology |
| GSH | Glutathione |
| ReMRT | Reverse magnetic resonance tuning |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| LPO | Lipid peroxidation |
| GPX4 | Glutathione peroxidase 4 |
| ox-LDL | Oxidized low-density lipoprotein |
| MCP-1 | Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 |
| IL-1β | Interleukin-1 beta |
| TNF-α | Tumor necro-sis factor-alpha |
| DHE | Dihydroethidium |
| BBDC | 1-borono-3,5-benzenedicarboxylic acid |
| Ag NPs | Silver nanoparticles |
| POD | Peroxidase |
| GSSG | Oxidized glutathione |
References
- Jiang, D.; Wei, W. Molecular imaging for better theranostics. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2023, 50, 3799–3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sebastiano, J.; Rodriguez, C.; Samuels, Z.V.; Pepin, K.; Zeglis, B.M. Molecular imaging in gynecology: Beyond cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2024, 65, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowe, S.P.; Pomper, M.G. Molecular imaging in oncology: Current impact and future directions. CA-Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 72, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brendel, J.M.; Mayrhofer, T.; Karády, J.; Kolossváry, M.; Kerkovits, N.M.; Langenbach, I.L.; Jung, M.; Kelsey, M.D.; Langenbach, M.C.; Pagidipati, N.; et al. Risk in women emerges at lower coronary plaque burden than in men: PROMISE trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2026, 19, e019011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karády, J.; Mayrhofer, T.; Brendel, J.M.; Kolossváry, M.; Langenbach, M.; Langenbach, I.; Baliyan, V.; Sturniolo, A.K.; Pagidipati, N.; Lu, M.T.; et al. Prognostic value of plaque volume in patients with first diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A substudy of the PROMISE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2026, 11, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Messina, E.; Borrelli, A.; Sciarra, A.; Laschena, L.; Antonini, D.; Shaholli, D.; Magliocca, F.M.; Novelli, S.; Santini, D.; La Torre, G.; et al. Primary noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer screening: A randomized clinical trial (PROSA). Eur. Urol. 2025, 89, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Güder, G.; Reiter, T.; Bauer, W.R.; Papavassiliu, T.; Schwab, J.; Pauschinger, M.; Lavall, D.; Wachter, R.; Berliner, D.; Bauersachs, J.; et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs. coronary angiography as primary strategy in newly diagnosed heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2025, 13, 102528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.; Shang, X.M.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, K.; Guo, X.; Xing, N.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y. Safety and efficacy study of 225Ac-DOTA-IBA in the treatment of bone metastases. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2026, 51, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooker, J.M.; Carson, R.E. Human positron emission tomography neuroimaging. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 21, 551–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwenck, J.; Sonanini, D.; Cotton, J.M.; Rammensee, H.G.; la Fougère, C.; Zender, L.; Pichler, B.J. Advances in PET imaging of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2023, 23, 474–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, L.; Roy, S.; Wang, P.; Li, Z.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Guo, B. Unveiling the future: Advancements in MRI imaging for neurodegenerative disorders. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 95, 102230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cash, R.F.H.; Cocchi, L.; Lv, J.; Fitzgerald, P.B.; Zalesky, A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided personalization of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 78, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moran, P.R. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1982, 1, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Friedman, B.J.; Waters, J.; Kwan, O.L.; DeMaria, A.N. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in determination of cardiac dimensions in normal subjects. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1985, 5, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, Y.; Zhou, I.Y.; Caravan, P. Quantitative in vivo molecular MRI. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2407262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soulat, G.; McCarthy, P.; Markl, M. 4D Flow with MRI. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 22, 103–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, K.E.; Fotaki, A.; Botnar, R.M.; Ferreira, V.M. Imaging methods: Magnetic resonance imaging. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 16, e014068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.-D.; Paudel, R.; Liu, J.; Ma, C.; Zhang, Z.-S.; Zhou, S.-K. MRI contrast agents: Classification and application. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vora, S.; Pafundi, D.; Voss, M.; Buras, M.; Ashman, J.; Bendok, B.R.; Breen, W.; Hu, L.; Kizilbash, S.; Laack, N.; et al. Short-course hypofractionated proton beam therapy, incorporating 18F-DOPA PET and contrast-enhanced MRI targeting, for patients aged 65 years and older with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, 1625–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avasthi, A.; Caro, C.; Pozo-Torres, E.; Leal, M.P.; García-Martín, M.L. Magnetic nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents. In Surface-Modified Nanobiomaterials for Electrochemical and Biomedicine Applications; Topics in Current Chemistry Collections; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 378, pp. 49–91. [Google Scholar]
- Runge, V.M.; Carollo, B.R.; Wolf, C.R.; Nelson, K.L.; Gelblum, D.Y. Gd DTPA: A review of clinical indications in central nervous system magnetic resonance imaging. Radiographics 1989, 9, 929–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elster, A.D.; Sobol, W.T.; Hinson, W.H. Pseudolayering of Gd-DTPA in the urinary bladder. Radiology 1990, 174, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-X.; Hussain, S.; Krestin, G. Superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents: Physicochemical characteristics and applications in MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2001, 11, 2319–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Arienzo, A.; Scaglione, G.; Vicinanza, G.; Manguso, F.; Bennato, R.; Belfiore, G.; Imbriaco, M.; Mazzacca, G. Magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxil, a negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agent, in the evaluation of ulcerative colitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 95, 720–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolen, S.A.; Shankar, P.R.; Gagnier, J.J.; MacEachern, M.P.; Singer, L.; Davenport, M.S. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease receiving a group II gadolinium-based contrast agent: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2019, 180, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mallepally, A.; Kidd, J.M.; Grizzard, J.D.; Syed, H.J.; Chetla, N.; Carucci, L.R.; Cowper, S.; Trankle, C.R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with advanced renal dysfunction following gadolinium-based contrast agents. Radiology 2025, 317, e251794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Ning, Y.; Zhu, H.; Rotile, N.J.; Wei, H.; Diyabalanage, H.; Hansen, E.C.; Zhou, I.Y.; Barrett, S.C.; Sojoodi, M.; et al. Fast detection of liver fibrosis with collagen-binding single-nanometer iron oxide nanoparticles via T1-weighted MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2220036120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, J.; Kim, S.; Rethinasabapathy, M.; Yang, Y.-J.; Huh, Y.S.; Cho, W.-S. Biotransformation of iron oxide nanoparticles and their impact on biokinetics in rats following intratracheal instillation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 494, 138518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saul, P.; Schröder, L.; Schmidt, A.B.; Hövener, J.B. Nanomaterials for hyperpolarized nuclear magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 15, e1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, F.; Davies, G.-L. Convergent evolution: Self-assembly of small molecule, polymeric, and inorganic contrast agents toward advanced MRI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 47871–47892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, S.; Cai, Z.; Ai, H. Stimulus-responsive nanoparticle magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: Design considerations and applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 10, 5630–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hefayathullah, M.; Singh, S.; Ganesan, V.; Maduraiveeran, G. Metal-organic frameworks for biomedical applications: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 331, 103210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miguel-Casañ, E.; Orton, G.R.F.; Schier, D.E.; Champness, N.R. Supramolecular chemistry in metal-organic framework materials. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2414509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zou, Y.; Chen, J.; Qu, Y.; Luo, X.; Wang, W.; Zheng, X. Evolution of nMOFs in photodynamic therapy: From porphyrins to chlorins and bacteriochlorins for better efficacy. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1533040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hamideh, R.A.; Akbari, B.; Fathi, P.; Misra, S.K.; Sutrisno, A.; Lam, F.; Pan, D. Biodegradable MRI visible drug eluting stent reinforced by metal organic frameworks. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, e2000136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunzen, H.; Jirak, D. Recent advances in metal-organic frameworks for applications in magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 50445–50462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Dong, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z. Metal-organic frameworks (MOF)-assisted sonodynamic therapy in anticancer applications. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 4102–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, J.; Yan, X.; He, J.; Niu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Geng, M.; Jia, T.; Feng, L.; Fu, W.; Hu, S. Metalloporphyrin organic framework oxygen-generators enable tumour-targeted photodynamic therapy and metabolic reprogramming for enhanced glioblastoma treatment. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2026, 705, 139521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Fang, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Mu, X.; Gao, T.; Wei, T.; Dai, Z. Adaptive size evolution of an MOFs-in-MOF nanovehicle for enhanced nucleus-targeted tumor chemotherapy. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 10605–10613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, W.; Tunca, E.T.; Farfán-Esponda, F.E.; Hosta-Rigau, L. Metal-organic frameworks for the fabrication of hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers: A comprehensive review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2026, 353, 103857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatakeyama, W.; Sanchez, T.J.; Rowe, M.D.; Serkova, N.J.; Liberatore, M.W.; Boyes, S.G. Synthesis of gadolinium nanoscale metal-organic framework with hydrotropes: Manipulation of particle size and magnetic resonance imaging capability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 1502–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Kuang, G.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, J.; Shang, L. Multi-bioinspired MOF delivery systems from microfluidics for tumor multimodal therapy. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2303818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.; Wu, L.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Xiong, T.; Liu, J.; Huang, C.; Xu, H.; Sun, H.; Chen, W.; et al. Metal-organic frameworks for advanced drug delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 2362–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penfield, J.G.; Reilly, R.F., Jr. What nephrologists need to know about gadolinium. Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol. 2007, 3, 654–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iki, N.; Nakane, R.; Masuya-Suzuki, A.; Ozawa, Y.; Maruoka, T.; Iiyama, M.; Sumiyoshi, A.; Aoki, I. MRI contrasting agent based on Mn-MOF-74 nanoparticles with coordinatively unsaturated sites. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2023, 25, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, X.; Wong, R.; Anisa, A.; Ma, S. Recent development of metal-organic framework nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2022, 281, 121322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moharramnejad, M.; Malekshah, R.E.; Ehsani, A.; Gharanli, S.; Shahi, M.; Alvan, S.A.; Salariyeh, Z.; Azadani, M.N.; Haribabu, J.; Basmenj, Z.S.; et al. A review of recent developments of metal-organic frameworks as combined biomedical platforms over the past decade. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 316, 102908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wan, S.-S.; Cheng, Q.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, X.-Z. A Mn(III)-sealed metal-organic framework nanosystem for redox-unlocked tumor theranostics. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 6561–6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, B.; Hutereau, M.; Walker, M.; Kashtiban, R.J.; Thompson, P.B.; Slater, B.; Walton, R.I. Modulator control of cation distribution in mixed-metal UiO-66(Zr,Ce) metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 2025, 37, 9676–9688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Chi, B.; Han, Z.; He, Y.; Tian, F.; Xu, Z.; Li, L.; Wang, J. Controllable synthesis of rare earth (Gd(3+),Tm(3+)) doped Prussian blue for multimode imaging guided synergistic treatment. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 12327–12337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.A. Metal-organic-frameworks for biomedical applications in drug delivery, and as MRI contrast agents. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2016, 105, 1184–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, M.-H.; Zhuang, R.-E.; Wei, D.-H.; Hsiao, M. Biomimetic red blood cell membrane-coated FePt metal-organic framework nanoparticles: A multifunctional theranostic system for enhanced MRI and targeted therapy. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 23343–23353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wu, J.; Ji, R.; Qiang, S.; Shen, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Jian, S.; Liu, S.; Xu, F.; Hu, H.; et al. A spatiotemporally controlled nanoplatform for photothermal BRD4 degradation enables synergistic cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e23928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, C.; Sha, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; et al. Coordination self-assembled AuTPyP-Cu metal-organic framework nanosheets with pH/ultrasound dual-responsiveness for synergistically triggering cuproptosis-augmented chemotherapy. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 9100–9113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Xu, X.; Wu, M.; Ediriweera, G.R.; Peng, H.; Zhen, X.; Jiang, X.; Searles, D.J.; et al. Fluoropolymer-MOF hybrids with switchable hydrophilicity for 19F MRI-monitored cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 8483–8498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Yu, H.; Si, P.; Wang, Z.; Wang, B.; Lin, W. Preparation of nanoscale cationic metal-organic framework Nano Mn(III)-TP for theranostics based on valence changes. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 8988–8995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Q.; Xu, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Xia, J.; Chen, Z. Mn(II)-hemoporfin-based metal-organic frameworks as a theranostic nanoplatform for MRI-guided sonodynamic therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 7838–7844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, H.; Hang, L.; Diao, Y.; Wang, H.; Fang, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Sun, H.; Wang, J.; Meng, X.; et al. Mn-doped MOF nanoparticles mitigating hypoxia via in-situ substitution strategy for dual-imaging guided combination treatment of microwave dynamic therapy and chemotherapy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 685, 912–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, X.; Kong, X.; Meng, J.; Zhang, X. Dual-responsive triple-synergistic Fe-MOF for tumor theranostics. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 9003–9013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, X.; Zhang, F.; Guo, H.; Zhang, C.; Hu, H.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Shuai, X.; Cao, Z. One-pot approach to Fe2+/Fe3+-based MOFs with enhanced catalytic activity for Fenton reaction. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, e2100780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mo, G.; Li, X.; Jian, Y.; Xu, W.; Xiao, X.; Chen, A.; Ding, Y.; Jiang, X.; Shen, J.; Fan, L.; et al. Mn(II)-MOF nanoparticles conjugated with EOB-PEG as high-performance hepatobiliary-specific MRI contrast agents. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 5743–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hadwani, K.; Chaturvedi, S.; Kumaran, S.S.; Kumari, S.; Singh, J.; Ghosh, M.P.; Basu, T. Breaking the gadolinium mold: A metal-organic framework contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2025, 8, 7989–8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, M.; Chen, Y.; Tao, C.; Tian, Q.; An, L.; Lin, J.; Tian, Q.; Yang, H.; Yang, S. Mn-porphyrin-based metal-organic framework with high longitudinal relaxivity for magnetic resonance imaging guidance and oxygen self-supplementing photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 41946–41956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lessard, J.M.; Pyle, D.; Bowen, J.; Lin, L.-W.; Musa, E.N.; Gładysiak, A.; Truong, L.; Kolluri, S.K.; Tanguay, R.L.; Wyatt, C.R.; et al. Aqueous-stable Mn(II)-MOF nanoparticles with high r1 relaxivity and biocompatibility: A novel T1 MRI contrast agent. J. Mater. Chem. B 2025, 13, 14837–14846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamaly, N.; Miller, A.D.; Bell, J.D. Chemistry of tumour targeted T1 based MRI contrast agents. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 1158–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.H.; Kim, B.H.; Na, H.B.; Hyeon, T. Paramagnetic inorganic nanoparticles as T1 MRI contrast agents. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 6, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.-H.; Huang, L.-Y.; Huang, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Pang, D.-W.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Cui, R. Ultrasmall MnSe nanoparticles as T1-MRI contrast agents for in vivo tumor imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 11167–11176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Zhang, B.; Ren, H.; Zhou, X.; He, C.; Shen, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, H. Supramolecular metal-organic frameworks as host-guest nanoplatforms for versatile and customizable biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2023, 168, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, M.; Yang, X.; Chen, Y.; He, M.; Zhou, W.; Lin, J.; An, L.; Yang, S. Grafting of Gd-DTPA onto MOF-808 to enhance MRI performance for guiding photothermal therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 8631–8638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, D.; Wu, T.; Qiu, T.; Li, J.; Gong, Y.; Weng, J.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yin, B.; Ling, Y.; et al. Coordination-dissociation induced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging responses in a spn-type MOF for potential drug release monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2425466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, G.; Feng, J.; Zhou, R.; Fan, Q.; Ren, B.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L.; Yang, J.; Zhu, J.; et al. Gadolinium coordination nanoparticle-based contrast agent for T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of tumors. Precis. Med. Eng. 2025, 2, 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, H.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Wu, Q.; You, Y.; Lan, Z.; Zou, K.-L.; Cheng, G.-W.; Chen, H.; Han, Y.-H.; Chen, Y.; et al. Microwave-responsive gadolinium metal-organic frameworks nanosystem for MRI-guided cancer thermotherapy and synergistic immunotherapy. Bioact. Mater. 2024, 33, 532–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiroishi, M.S.; Castellazzi, G.; Boxerman, J.L.; D’Amore, F.; Essig, M.; Nguyen, T.B.; Provenzale, J.M.; Enterline, D.S.; Anzalone, N.; Dörfler, A.; et al. Principles of T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI technique in brain tumor imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014, 41, 296–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Hughes, T.C.; Muir, B.W.; Waddington, L.J.; Gengenbach, T.R.; Easton, C.D.; Hinton, T.M.; Moffat, B.A.; Hao, X.; Qiu, J. Water-dispersible magnetic carbon nanotubes as T2-weighted MRI contrast agents. Biomaterials 2013, 35, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Gong, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, D.; Zeng, X.; Ling, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Z. Topology-dependent T2 relaxivity in Fe3O cluster-based MOFs for enhanced tumor monitoring via MRI. J. Mater. Chem. B 2025, 13, 5521–5529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Jia, N. PDA-coated CPT@MIL-53(Fe)-based theranostic nanoplatform for pH-responsive and MRI-guided chemotherapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 1821–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Sene, S.; Mielcarek, A.M.; Miraux, S.; Menguy, N.; Ihiawakrim, D.; Ersen, O.; Péchoux, C.; Guillou, N.; Scola, J.; et al. Hierarchical superparamagnetic metal–organic framework nanovectors as anti-inflammatory nanomedicines. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 3195–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geraldes, C.F.G.C. Rational design of magnetic nanoparticles as T1-T2 dual-mode MRI contrast agents. Molecules 2024, 29, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, T.; Wang, H.; Huang, L.; Wu, H.; Fan, Z.; Jing, S. Redox ferrocenylseleno compounds modulate longitudinal and transverse relaxation times of FNPs-Gd MRI contrast agents for multimodal imaging and photo-Fenton therapy. Acta Biomater. 2023, 164, 496–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Lu, M.; Qiu, T.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Deng, M.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, W.; Ling, Y.; et al. Gelothermal synthesis of monodisperse MIL-88A nanoparticles with tunable sizes and metal centers for potential bioapplications. Small 2023, 19, e2301894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhu, X.; Meng, X.; Zhong, H. Lenvatinib delivery using a Gd/Fe bimetallic MOF: Enhancing antitumor immunity following microwave-based thermal therapy. Acta Biomater. 2023, 172, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazari, M.; Ramezani, M.; Eshghi, H.; Nekooei, S.; Saljooghi, A.S.; Alibolandi, M. Synthesis of RGD-dextran-coated Fe-porphyrin-based Zr-MOF for CT/MR imaging and targeted chemo-photothermal therapy of melanoma. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 360, 123614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alarcón-Fernández, C.; Zaldo, C.; Bañobre-López, M.; Gallo, J.; Ramos-Cabrer, P.; Plaza-García, S.; Villaverde, G.; Ruperti, A.; Cascales, C. Biocompatible NaLn(WO4)2 core-shell nanoplatelets for multimodal MRI contrast, NIR imaging, and high sensitivity infrared luminescent ratiometric thermometry. J. Mater. Chem. B 2025, 13, 9642–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Nan, B.; Xu, J.; Yang, T.; Xu, L.; Lu, C.; Zhang, X.-B.; Rao, J.; Song, G. Magnetic-susceptibility-dependent ratiometric probes for enhancing quantitative MRI. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2024, 9, 671–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Deng, J.; Lu, H.; Mei, Z.; Lu, Z.; Guo, J.; Chen, A.; Cao, R.; Ding, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Reverse magnetic resonance tuning nanoplatform with heightened sensitivity for non-invasively multiscale visualizing ferroptosis-based tumor sensitization therapy. Biomaterials 2025, 315, 122935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arın, T.A.T.; Sedlacek, O. Stimuli-responsive polymers for advanced 19F magnetic resonance imaging: From chemical design to biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 5630–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Duan, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, B.; Cao, S.; Wu, D. Hyperbranched polymeric 19F MRI contrast agents with long T2 relaxation time based on β-Cyclodextrin and phosphorycholine. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 5860–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y.; Chen, D.; Chen, L.; Liu, K.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Lin, H.; Gao, J. Fluorinated iron metal-organic frameworks for activatable 19F magnetic resonance imaging and synergistic therapy of tumors. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 11989–11998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajoolabady, A.; Pratico, D.; Lin, L.; Mantzoros, C.S.; Bahijri, S.; Tuomilehto, J.; Ren, J. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology and mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. 2024, 15, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borén, J.; Packard, C.J.; Binder, C.J. Apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in atherogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2025, 22, 399–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.W.; Jandeleit-Dahm, K.A. Atherosclerosis in diabetes mellitus: Novel mechanisms and mechanism-based therapeutic approaches. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2025, 22, 482–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Libby, P. The changing landscape of atherosclerosis. Nature 2021, 592, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, H.; Wang, F.; Chong, H.; Wang, J.; Bai, Y.; Du, M.; Yuan, X.; Yang, X.; Wu, M.; Li, Y.; et al. A curcumin-modified coordination polymers with ROS scavenging and macrophage phenotype regulating properties for efficient ulcerative colitis treatment. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2300601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fontana, F.; Molinaro, G.; Moroni, S.; Pallozzi, G.; Ferreira, M.P.; Tello, R.P.; Elbadri, K.; Torrieri, G.; Correia, A.; Kemell, M.; et al. Biomimetic platelet-cloaked nanoparticles for the delivery of anti-inflammatory curcumin in the treatment of atherosclerosis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, e2302074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhu, R.; Jiang, H.; Yin, Q.; Gu, J.; Chen, J.; Ji, X.; Wu, X.; Fu, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Autophagy enhanced by curcumin ameliorates inflammation in atherogenesis via the TFEB-P300-BRD4 axis. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 2280–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, F.; Fang, H.; Huang, L.; Wang, Q.; Cao, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, W.; Wang, X. Curcumin equipped nanozyme-like metal-organic framework platform for the targeted atherosclerosis treatment with lipid regulation and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging capability. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2309062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darby, E.M.; Trampari, E.; Siasat, P.; Gaya, M.S.; Alav, I.; Webber, M.A.; Blair, J.M.A. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 21, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, S.; Xiao, W.; Zhou, C.; Pu, Q.; Deng, X.; Lan, L.; Liang, H.; Song, X.; Wu, M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abbas, A.; Barkhouse, A.; Hackenberger, D.; Wright, G.D. Antibiotic resistance: A key microbial survival mechanism that threatens public health. Cell Host Microbe 2024, 32, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makabenta, J.M.V.; Nabawy, A.; Li, C.-H.; Schmidt-Malan, S.; Patel, R.; Rotello, V.M. Nanomaterial-based therapeutics for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 19, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, P.; Xiao, X. Metal-based nanomaterials as antimicrobial agents: A novel driveway to accelerate the aggravation of antibiotic resistance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 455, 131658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, Y.; Cui, T.; Liu, C.; Yang, W.; Zhang, B. Tunable hierarchically porous gadolinium-based metal-organic frameworks for bacteria-targeting magnetic resonance imaging and in situ anti-bacterial therapy. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2415209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gu, W.; Liu, D.; Wu, Y.; Yang, W.; Yun, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liu, S. Biomimetic catalase-templated nanoprobes for MRI-guided oxygen-supplemented photodynamic therapy in breast cancer. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2026, 13, e02430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lapusan, R.; Balmus, A.; Fechete, R.; Neamtu, B.V.; Ponti, J.; Borlan, R.; Focsan, M. From fundamentals to applications: Magnetic nanoparticles for MRI imaging and NIR-induced thermal activation in tissue-mimicking environments. J. Mater. Chem. B 2025, 13, 12056–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Tian, H.; Yu, Y.; Gan, Y.; Li, H.; Yuan, M.; Huang, X.; Liu, X. Recent advancement in MRI-based nanotheranostic agents for tumor diagnosis and therapy integration. Int. J. Nanomed. 2025, 20, 10503–10540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Chen, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhou, S. Design of an anti-PD-L1-mediated MOF nanodrug delivery system using terpyridine-metal coordination for tumor theranostics. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 1407–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Sproules, S.; Liu, J.; Forgan, R.S. Multifunctional Fe-doped MOF-808 nanocomposites for chemo/chemodynamic synergistic therapy. Small 2025, 22, e12728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Tian, X.-T.; Shang, Y.; Li, Y.-H.; Yin, X.-B. Theranostic Mn-porphyrin metal-organic frameworks for magnetic resonance imaging-guided nitric oxide and photothermal synergistic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 28390–28398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, W.; Peng, L.; Guo, P.; Hui, H.; Yang, X.; Tian, J. Metal-organic frameworks as a theranostic nanoplatform for combinatorial chemophotothermal therapy adapted to different administration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 6, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, X.-T.; Cao, P.-P.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.-H.; Yin, X.-B. GSH-activated MRI-guided enhanced photodynamic- and chemo-combination therapy with a MnO2-coated porphyrin metal organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 6241–6244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, L.; Ji, Q.; Chi, B.; You, S.; Lu, S.; Yang, T.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, J. Construction nanoenzymes with elaborately regulated multi-enzymatic activities for photothermal-enhanced catalytic therapy of tumor. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2023, 222, 113058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Xin, N.; Qiao, Z.; Chen, S.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, D.; Sun, J.; Fan, H. Bioactive MOFs based theranostic agent for highly effective combination of multimodal imaging and chemo-phototherapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, e2000205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meng, Z.; Huang, H.; Huang, D.; Zhang, F.; Mi, P. Functional metal-organic framework-based nanocarriers for accurate magnetic resonance imaging and effective eradication of breast tumor and lung metastasis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 581, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Lian, X.; Xiong, C.; Tian, R.; Hu, L.; Xiong, X.; Tian, J. uPAR targeted phototheranostic metal-organic framework nanoprobes for MR/NIR-II imaging-guided therapy and surgical resection of glioblastoma. Mater. Des. 2021, 198, 109386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Wen, C.; Sun, Y.-Q.; Yu, H.; Yin, X.-B. Mixed-metal MOF-derived hollow porous nanocomposite for trimodality imaging guided reactive oxygen species-augmented synergistic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, e2104378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.-B.; Wang, S.; He, X.; Tang, W.; Wang, J.; Shao, A.; Zhang, J. A combination of glioma in vivo imaging and in vivo drug delivery by metal-organic framework based composite nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 7683–7689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, J.; Zu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Fan, D.; Shi, Y.; Xia, Q.; Cheng, J. Multifunctional Hf/Mn-TCPP metal-organic framework nanoparticles for triple-modality imaging-guided PTT/RT synergistic cancer therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 7687–7702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Zhou, J.; Chen, R.; Shi, R.; Wang, C.; Lu, J.; Zhao, G.; Xia, G.; Zhou, S.; Liu, Z.; et al. Core-shell metal-organic frameworks as Fe2+ suppliers for Fe2+-mediated cancer therapy under multimodality imaging. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 3477–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.; Yao, Y.; Liang, T.; Chen, M.; Zeng, M.; Li, P.; Zhang, S.; Yao, T. Neutrophil extracellular traps enhance platinum resistance in ovarian cancer via SHP-1 activation. Cancer Lett. 2026, 643, 218288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakhani, N.J.; Stewart, D.; Richardson, D.L.; Dockery, L.E.; Van Le, L.; Call, J.; Rangwala, F.; Wang, G.; Ma, B.; Metenou, S.; et al. First-in-human phase I trial of the bispecific CD47 inhibitor and CD40 agonist Fc-fusion protein, SL-172154 in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2025, 13, e010565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Sheng, J.-J.; Zheng, S.-A.; Liu, P.-W.; Wu, N.; Zeng, W.-J.; Li, Y.-H.; Wang, J. Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: From mechanisms to treatment strategies. Genes Dis. 2025, 13, 101801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.A.; Vikramdeo, K.S.; Sudan, S.K.; Singh, S.; Wilhite, A.; Dasgupta, S.; Rocconi, R.P.; Singh, A.P. Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: From drug resistance mechanisms to liquid biopsy-based biomarkers for disease management. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021, 77, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Xie, P.; Cowan, M.; Huang, H.; Cardenas, H.; Keathley, R.; Tanner, E.J.; Fleming, G.F.; Moroney, J.W.; Pant, A.; et al. Epigenetic priming enhances antitumor immunity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e158800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, F.; Cardenas, H.; Huang, H.; Jiang, G.; Perkins, S.M.; Zhang, C.; Keer, H.N.; Liu, Y.; Nephew, K.P.; Matei, D. Genomic and epigenomic signatures in ovarian cancer associated with resensitization to platinum drugs. Cancer Res. 2017, 78, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Fang, F.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Epigenetic metal-organic framework nanoagonist overcomes triple defenses to enable effective chemo-metalloimmunotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Adv. Mater. 2026, 38, e17286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]









| Metal | Ligand | Mode | Relaxation (mM−1s−1) | Morphology | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mn(III) | ![]() | T1 | r1 = 2.65 (without GSH); r1 = 6.08 (2.5 mM GSH) | fusiform-like structure: 170 nm in length, 50 nm in width | [48] |
| Mn(III) | ![]() | T1 | r1 = 1.037 (without GSH); r1 = 7.650 (GSH treated) | rod-like structure | [56] |
| Mn(II) | ![]() | T1 | r1 = 3.55 (PEGylated) | amorphous structure; spherical: 124 ± 51 nm | [57] |
| Mn(II)/Fe(III) | ![]() | T1 | r1 = 2.007 | spindle-like structure: 100 nm | [58] |
| Fe(III) | ![]() | T2 | r2 = 8.23 (PCN-600); r2 = 32.84 (PCN@PDA) | spindle: 150 nm | [59] |
| Fe(II)/Fe(III) | ![]() | T2 | r2 = 5.03 (pH 7.4); r2 = 9.27 (pH 6.0); r2 = 21.37 (pH 6.0 + H2O2) | hydrangea-like structure: 70 ± 11.5 nm | [60] |
| Mn(II) | ![]() | T1-T2 | r1 = 7.3 in water; r1 = 66.4 in HSA; r2 = 55.3 in water; r2 = 121.2 in HSA | nanoparticle ranging from 50 to 150 nm | [61] |
| Gd(III)/Fe(III) | ![]() | T1-T2 | r1 = 6.03 in agar; r1 = 3.85 in water; r2 = 53.65 in agar; r2 = 26.72 in water | bipyramidal: 1.108 μm in length, 583 nm in width; spheroid: 229 nm | [62] |
| Zr(IV)/Mn(III) | ![]() | T1-T2 | r1 = 30.3; r2 = 36.7 (0.5 T); r1 = 35.3; r2 = 42.5 (1.0 T) | spindle-like structure: 200 nm | [63] |
| Mn(II) | ![]() | T1-T2 | r1 = 4.98; r2 = 75.7 | rod-like structure: 5 × 40 nm | [64] |
| Materials | Metal | Ligand | Characteristic | Function | Models | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPT/αPD-L1@Tpy-SS-MOF | Cu(II) | ![]() | Antibody-gated; GSH response | T1-MRI/FL imaging/chemotherapy/checkpoint blockade | HepG2/AGS | [106] |
| CA@MOF-808(Zr/Fe)-AuNP-Mn-PEG | Zr(IV)/Fe(III)/Mn(II) | ![]() | PEGylated; phosphate response | T1-MRI/CDT/chemotherapy | HepG2 | [107] |
| NMOF-SNO | Zr(IV)/Mn(II) | ![]() | Heat/light response | T1-MRI/PTT/NO therapy | MCF-7 | [108] |
| RGD-Au@Fe-MOF | Fe(III) | ![]() | Tumor-targeted | T2-MRI/chemotherapy /PTT | MDA-MB-231 | [109] |
| DOX@PCN@MnO2@PAH | Fe(III) | ![]() | GSH response | T1-MRI/PDT/chemotherapy | 4T1 | [110] |
| Co/La-PB@MOF-199/GOx | Co(II)/La(III)/Cu(II) | ![]() | pH response/POD/CAT/GPx | T2-MRI/PTT/catalytic therapy | 4T1 | [111] |
| Fe-DOX@Gd-MOF-ICG | Fe(III)/Gd(III) | ![]() | High drug loading ~71.4%; pH response | T2-MRI/PAI/chemotherapy/PTT/PDT | 4T1 | [112] |
| Mn2+&DOX@MOF | Mn(II)/Zr(IV) | ![]() | PEGylated; pH response | T1-MRI/chemotherapy | 4T1 | [113] |
| CH4T@MOF-PEG-AE | Fe(II) | ![]() | Tumor-targeted/BBB across | T2-MRI/FL imaging/PTT | U87 | [114] |
| ICG@Mn/Cu/Zn-MOF@MnO2 | Mn(II)/Cu(II)/Zn(II) | ![]() | pH/light response/porous | T1-MRI/FL/PTT/PDT/CDT | U87 | [115] |
| Mn-ZIF-8/5-Fu | Mn(II)/Zn(II) | ![]() | pH response | T1-MRI/chemotherapy | U87 | [116] |
| FA-Hf-Mn-NMOF | Hf(IV)/Mn(III) | ![]() | Tumor-targeted/high-Z elements/CAT | T1-MRI/CT/PAI/PTT/RT | S180 | [117] |
| Mn3[Co(CN)6]2@MIL-100(Fe)@AS | Mn(II)/Co(III)/Fe(III) | ![]() | pH response/single/two-photon | T1/T2 MRI/chemotherapy/ROS therapy | HeLa | [118] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, W.; Yan, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Xiong, H.; Liu, T. Metal–Organic Framework as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18050621
Wang W, Yan Z, Yu Y, Zhou M, Xiong H, Liu T. Metal–Organic Framework as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pharmaceutics. 2026; 18(5):621. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18050621
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Weiqi, Zijiao Yan, Yajie Yu, Mengjiao Zhou, Hejian Xiong, and Tingting Liu. 2026. "Metal–Organic Framework as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging" Pharmaceutics 18, no. 5: 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18050621
APA StyleWang, W., Yan, Z., Yu, Y., Zhou, M., Xiong, H., & Liu, T. (2026). Metal–Organic Framework as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pharmaceutics, 18(5), 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18050621
























