Next Article in Journal
Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Cenostigma bracteosum Hydroethanolic Extract: Chemical Profile, Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Gel Formulation Development
Previous Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Ahmad et al. Quantification and Evaluations of Catechin Hydrate Polymeric Nanoparticles Used in Brain Targeting for the Treatment of Epilepsy. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 203
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combining Advanced Therapies with Alternative Treatments: A New Approach to Managing Antimicrobial Resistance?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bioactive Plant Compounds as Alternatives Against Antifungal Resistance in the Candida Strains

by
Thainá dos Santos Dantas
1,
Janaina Carla Barbosa Machado
2,
Magda Rhayanny Assunção Ferreira
2,* and
Luiz Alberto Lira Soares
1,2,*
1
Postgraduate Program in Therapeutic Innovation, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(6), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060687
Submission received: 27 March 2025 / Revised: 5 May 2025 / Accepted: 19 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025

Abstract

The pathogenicity of Candida spp. poses a persistent challenge, particularly in hospital environments where these species proliferate and cause opportunistic infections. Many strains have developed resistance to commonly used antifungal agents, including azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins, complicating treatment, especially in immuno-compromised patients. Understanding the mechanisms underlying antifungal resistance, such as mutations in genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis, efflux pump activity, and enzymatic pathways, is crucial for developing targeted interventions. Given the challenges associated with discovering new antifungal agents, medicinal plants have emerged as a promising source of bioactive compounds with anti-Candida activity. Secondary metabolites, including terpenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, and tannins, exhibit various mechanisms of action, such as biofilm inhibition, membrane disruption, and oxidative stress induction. However, challenges such as extract standardization, and the lack of clinical studies continue to limit their therapeutic application. This review underscores the potential of medicinal plants as complementary or alternative strategies to conventional antifungal therapies, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary research to overcome these hurdles and harness the therapeutic potential of natural products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fungal infections have become a serious public health concern, affecting approximately 6 to 55 million people worldwide with life-threatening diseases, particularly those caused by opportunistic fungi, which complicate treatment [1]. Moreover, several studies have highlighted the impact of these infections, which exacerbate the conditions of patients with pre-existing illnesses or those hospitalized, making them one of the main challenges in clinical practice. Key opportunistic fungal species include Candida spp., Sporothrix spp., Aspergillus spp., and Cryptococcus spp., which account have mortality rates of approximately 90–100% if left untreated, causing diseases of the skin, lungs, vagina, bloodstream, and meninges [2,3]. These infections can be classified as superficial, subcutaneous, or systemic, involving a variety of species that exhibit both yeast-like and filamentous forms, each with varying degrees of virulence [4,5].
The growing resistance of fungi to conventional antifungal drugs underscores the urgent need for new therapeutic alternatives. Among these, natural products, particularly plant-derived compounds, have gained significant attention due to their unique mechanisms of action and structural diversity [6,7]. Secondary metabolites produced by plants, such as terpenoids, flavonoids, and alkaloids, serve as natural defenses against external threats and exhibit various pharmacological activities, including potent antifungal effects. Their complex structures enable them to interact with fungal cells in novel ways, offering potential solutions to overcome resistance. Several studies have highlighted the antifungal properties of various plant species, particularly their activity against Candida spp., demonstrating promising results even against resistant strains [8,9]. This positions plant-based natural products as a viable alternative to conventional antifungal resistance.
Therefore, there is an increasing scientific interest in medicinal plants with antifungal activity, particularly against Candida species. In this context, the article search was conducted between November and December 2024, using ScienceDirect and PubMed databases. The following descriptors were applied: “natural products AND Candida”, “Candida spp.”, “resistance mechanisms”, and “antifungals AND Candida”, with most studies selected from the past five years. This review examines the resistance mechanisms associated with current antifungal agents and explores the potential of phytochemicals as alternative candidates for developing new drugs targeting fungal cells.

2. Candida spp.

The genus Candida includes a diverse range of species that exhibit various morphological forms, such as unicellular yeast cells that reproduce through budding, and multicellular forms like hyphae and pseudohyphae (Figure 1). These structural adaptations give Candida species resistance mechanisms to survive in diverse environments. Among the species of greatest clinical relevance are Candida albicans, the primary cause of systemic infections in immunocompromised patients, as well as C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, and, more recently C. auris [6].
Candidiasis can manifest as superficial lesions on mucosal surfaces, such as the mouth and vulvovaginal areas, or on the skin, causing symptoms like pruritus, pain, and discharge. In more severe cases, candidiasis may progress to systemic infections, with the fungus invading tissues and entering the bloodstream, thereby impairing organ function. The severity of these infections depends on the species involved and their virulence factors, which facilitate fungal proliferation and worsen the disease course. Virulence factors, such as biofilm formation and enzyme production, often contribute to the development of resistance mechanisms, exacerbating the scarcity of effective therapeutic options [8,10,11].
Candida species are opportunistic pathogens that exhibit several virulence traits, including adherence capabilities, morphological polymorphism, phenotypic variability, toxin production, enzymatic activity, and biofilm formation. These traits play a crucial role in the pathogenicity and differentiation of Candida species. Identification is commonly performed using clinical sample cultures, microscopy, fermentation and biochemical tests, and molecular techniques such as PCR (polymerase chain reaction) [12]. For example, adhesins responsible for cellular adhesion are encoded by different genes in Candida species. In C. albicans, cellular adhesion is mediated by the ALS (agglutinin-like sequence) family, which enhances its adhesion potential compared to other species, such as C. tropicalis and C. glabrata, where adhesion is encoded by EPA (epithelial adhesin) [13]. Furthermore, Ramos et al. [14] observed that the isolates with the highest biofilm formation and metabolic activity were from C. tropicalis, followed by isolates of C. krusei.

3. Antifungal Agents and Resistance Mechanisms

In recent years, the increasing prevalence of diseases exacerbated by candidiasis has motivated extensive research into therapies targeting Candida spp. Various classes of antifungal drugs with distinct mechanisms of action have been developed and incorporated into clinical practice. The main classes of antifungal agents include polyenes, azoles, allylamines, echinocandins, and pyrimidines, with four of these azoles, polyenes, echinocandins, and pyrimidines standing out due to their proven efficacy and widespread clinical use in the treatment of candidiasis [15]. These classes were selected for detailed analysis in this review based on their distinct pharmacological profiles, broad spectrum of activity, and clinical relevance in the management of Candida infections. Although allylamines also act by inhibiting ergosterol biosynthesis, their antifungal spectrum is more effective against dermatophytes, and they are primarily indicated for cutaneous and superficial fungal infections [4,16].
While these drugs are effective, their use requires caution, as some compounds also bind to human steroids, leading to adverse effects such as cellular toxicity. Additionally, the indiscriminate and continuous use of antifungal treatments has driven the evolution of resistance mechanisms, allowing fungi to evade the effects of these drugs [17,18].
The growing prevalence of antifungal resistance has prompted significant research into alternative therapies, including comparative studies and drug combinations. Candida resistance can occur through various strategies, such as drug target modification, overexpression of efflux pumps that expel the drug from the cell, or changes in cell membrane permeability that inhibit drug entry. Studies have also identified fungi lacking ergosterol or carrying mutations in specific genes as key resistance mechanisms [19,20]. In Table 1, the various mechanisms of resistance of antifungal agents used against Candida spp. are shown.

3.1. Azoles

Azoles are a group of antifungal drugs characterized by the presence of nitrogen atoms in their cyclic carbon structure, with a primarily fungistatic action. Key representatives of this class include fluconazole, miconazole, clotrimazole, and voriconazole. These drugs target the fungal cell membrane by inhibiting ergosterol synthesis, a crucial component for maintaining membrane integrity and stability (Figure 2). The disruption of ergosterol synthesis results in membrane destabilization and ultimately inhibits fungal growth [11,29].
The mechanism of action involves the inhibition of 14α-demethylase, an enzyme essential for converting lanosterol into ergosterol. By blocking this enzyme, azoles cause an accumulation of toxic sterol intermediates, leading to membrane dysfunction and altered permeability. Studies suggest that azoles target the heme protein by binding to the iron atom in its active site through the nitrogen atom in the azole ring [29].
However, resistance to azoles, particularly fluconazole, is widespread among Candida spp. Resistance mechanisms include genetic alterations that reduce the drugs’ efficacy. Efflux pumps encoded by the CDR1 and CDR2 genes, regulated by transcription factors such as TAC1 and MDR1, actively expel azoles from the fungal cell, diminishing their effectiveness [21,22,30]. Another resistance mechanism involves mutations in the lanosterol 14α-demethylase enzyme, encoded by the ERG11 gene, which decreases azole binding affinity. Additionally, mutations in the ERG3 gene, involved in ergosterol biosynthesis, have been shown to redirect the metabolic pathway, preventing the accumulation of toxic intermediates. This alternative pathway allows the fungal cell to maintain functionality and avoid cellular damage, rendering azoles ineffective [23,26].
Most Candida species share common resistance mechanisms; however, certain genes are more prominently expressed in some species compared to others. For instance, C. albicans exhibits a higher expression of CDR1, triggered by the transcription factor TAC1, which constitutes a primary pathway for azole resistance in this species. This contrasts with C. auris, where CDR1 expression is not similarly affected [31]. As reported by [22], blood isolates of C. albicans not only exhibited CDR1 expression but also showed increased expression of CDR2. Similarly, C. glabrata isolates demonstrated higher expression of the CDR1 gene. In C. tropicalis isolates, 6 out of 17 samples expressed MDR1 genes, while no expression of CDR2 was detected. Supporting these findings, the studies by [23], on fluconazole-resistant C. glabrata isolates from different continents revealed an upregulation of efflux pump genes (CDR1 and CDR2). It is important to note that these mechanisms may vary depending on the region from which the Candida isolates are obtained, potentially leading to mutations with varying intensities and specificities.

3.2. Polyenes

Polyenes are a class of antifungal agents characterized by their specific interaction with ergosterol (Figure 2), a vital component of the fungal cell membrane. This interaction disrupts the membrane’s structural integrity, rendering it susceptible to damage and ultimately leading to cell lysis [18]. The primary representatives of this class are amphotericin B and nystatin. While both exhibit fungicidal activity, amphotericin B is more effective against a wide range of fungi and is commonly used to treat systemic infections, whereas nystatin is primarily employed for topical treatment of cutaneous infections [19,32].
The mechanism of action of polyenes involves their affinity for sterols in fungal cells, specifically ergosterol. This binding triggers the release of hydroxyl radicals into the cell, disrupting membrane functionality and causing its rupture. Additionally, polyenes form pores in the fungal cell membrane, leading to an efflux of ions and essential intracellular components, which further compromises fungal survival [4,5].
Resistance to this class of antifungal agents is rare; however, some Candida species have been reported to exhibit mutations that reduce the antifungal efficacy of amphotericin B. Genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis indicate that Candida strains, particularly C. albicans and C. glabrata, and show resistance to amphotericin B due to mutations in ERG3, ERG5, ERG6, and ERG11. Additionally, biofilm formation represents another resistance mechanism, potentially correlated with the overexpression of the ALS3 and FKS1 genes in C. albicans. These genes encode glycoproteins located on fungal cells, enhancing biofilm formation and contributing to resistance [12,15,25].

3.3. Echinocandins

Echinocandins are a class of antifungal agents that target the fungal cell wall by inhibiting the enzyme β-1,3-D-glucan synthase (Figure 2). This inhibition compromises cell wall integrity, leading to cellular damage and ultimately fungal cell death. Key drugs in this class include caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, which are commonly used to treat invasive fungal infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients [18,33]. The mechanism of action of echinocandins involves disrupting the protein complex responsible for producing β-1,3-glucans. This process is regulated by GTP-binding peptides, Fks1p and Fks2p. However, the precise binding site of echinocandins on these proteins remains unclear, suggesting that additional mechanisms or alternative targets within the β-1,3-glucan synthesis pathway might be involved [4,29].
Although echinocandins were developed to address resistant fungal strains, cases of resistance have been reported. Studies indicate that mutations in the FKS1 and FKS2 genes can alter regions critical to the enzyme β-1,3-D-glucan synthase, reducing drug efficacy [24,26]. These mutations vary among different Candida species, resulting in varying levels of resistance [17,29]. Mutations in FKS1 can be found in caspofungin-resistant C. auris isolates, as well as in C. glabrata strains, which may also include FKS2 mutations. These mutations result in an increased minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the drug. [27,28]. Furthermore, research shows that infections caused by Candida isolates carrying MDR (multidrug resistance) genes are associated with decreased effectiveness of this drug class [34,35].

3.4. Pyrimidines

5-Fluorocytosine (5-FC) is a fluorinated pyrimidine analog with antifungal activity that acts as an antimetabolite, inhibiting nucleic acid synthesis in pathogenic yeasts such as Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans [11]. Its mechanism of action involves a cascade of enzymatic conversions that ultimately lead to the inhibition of both RNA and DNA synthesis, resulting in fungal cell death. Initially, 5-FC is converted into 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by the enzyme cytosine deaminase (Fca1), which is present in fungal cells but absent in human cells, conferring selectivity to the drug. Subsequently, 5-FU is metabolized into 5-fluorouridine monophosphate (FUMP) by uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT), and incorporated into fungal RNA in place of uracil. This disrupts protein synthesis and inhibits thymidine synthesis, leading to impaired DNA replication. The cumulative effect results in toxicity that halts fungal cell proliferation and repair mechanisms [5,18].
However, resistance to 5-FC is commonly reported, particularly in Candida species, and is often associated with defects in the enzymatic conversion steps that are crucial to the drug’s efficacy. Documented resistance mechanisms include mutations in the FCY1 gene, which encodes Fca1, impairing the conversion of 5-FC to 5-FU [4,18]. Fungal cells may also lose or modify the UPRT enzyme, encoded by FUR1, which blocks the conversion of 5-FU to FUMP. In addition, Candida species can develop mechanisms to counteract RNA and DNA damage through the overexpression of repair enzymes such as thymidylate synthase and the activation of stress response pathways, including the Hog1 MAPK pathway [5,36].
Given these resistance concerns, 5-FC is typically reserved for combination therapies, aiming to overcome resistance, reduce toxicity, or enhance antifungal efficacy through synergistic effects. However, its use requires careful evaluation of pharmacological interactions and therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure safety and effectiveness [37].
In summary, the increasing prevalence of antifungal resistance in Candida spp. underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms involved in drug resistance across different classes of antifungal agents. Azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins, while effective, face significant challenges due to genetic mutations, efflux pump overexpression, and biofilm formation in resistant strains. These mechanisms not only limit the efficacy of current treatments but also emphasize the necessity for continued research into novel therapeutic strategies. Exploring alternative antifungal agents, understanding regional variations in resistance patterns, and investigating synergistic drug combinations remain critical to overcoming the global challenge of fungal infections.

4. Medicinal Plants

The medicinal use of plants dates back thousands of years, with China and India among the most prominent countries with histories of such use in therapeutic practices. Plants have been utilized in various forms, including teas, compresses, baths, and extracts. With the growing availability of information and discoveries, both the pharmaceutical and food industries have shown increasing interest in exploring the multiple applications of medicinal plants. This renewed attention to traditional practices highlights their valuable potential for developing new treatments and innovative products [9,38].
Medicinal plants produce secondary metabolites that play a crucial role in their defense mechanisms and biological functions. These chemical components, characterized by complex structures, exert diverse mechanisms of action in biological activities [39]. Their properties include anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, neuroprotective, and immunostimulant activities. Phytochemical studies have identified polyphenols, terpenes, and alkaloids (Figure 3) as key compounds in plant species exhibiting these activities. This has led to extensive research into their therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action [40,41,42].
The growing interest in natural alternative medicines with antifungal activity stems from the limitations of conventional antifungal agents. These synthetic drugs often present undesirable side effects and are increasingly challenged by the problem of acquired resistance [7,43]. Plant species, being natural sources, offer a promising alternative due to their chemical diversity, producing bioactive compounds effective against a broad range of pathogens [44,45].
Plant-derived compounds have gained increasing attention as promising alternatives for managing fungal infections, particularly those caused by drug-resistant Candida species. One of the most compelling advantages of these compounds lies in their multifactorial mechanisms of action, which make it more difficult for fungal cells to develop resistance [6,7]. Unlike synthetic antifungals, which often act on single molecular targets, plant metabolites can simultaneously affect various cellular pathways, including membrane integrity, metabolic function, and virulence gene expression. These properties not only enhance their fungicidal or fungistatic activity but also reduce the likelihood of resistance development. Furthermore, many phytocompounds exhibit synergistic effects when combined with conventional antifungals, allowing dose reductions and minimizing side effects. Their low cytotoxicity to human cells also contributes to a more favorable safety profile [6,46,47,48,49,50].
In this context, the selection of studies included in Table 2 was based on stringent criteria to ensure data quality, relevance, and reproducibility. Specifically, we included only studies that (1) clearly identified the chemical constituents responsible for the antifungal activity, and (2) provided minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained through well-defined and standardized susceptibility testing against Candida spp. Based on this, Table 2 presents the main compounds involved in anti-Candida activity studied in recent years, with a focus on different classes of secondary metabolites and their diverse antifungal mechanisms.
Notably, bioactive compounds within the same chemical group can exhibit varying antifungal potentials, as evidenced by comparative results of MIC values, considering both fungistatic and fungicidal effects. These variations reflect structural properties as well as interaction with fungal targets.

4.1. Polyphenols Activity

Polyphenol compounds are widely recognized for their biological activities and are abundant in various plant species. Numerous studies highlight their primary antioxidant function, which protects organisms from oxidative stress, both internal and external. Flavonoids consist of the most abundant phenolic compounds, with three rings, and structural variations arising from substitutions in the heterocyclic pyran ring (C), which connects two aromatic rings (A and B). These compounds are classified into several subclasses, including flavonols, flavanones, flavones, flavanols, anthocyanidins, isoflavones, and chalcones [80,81].
Flavonoids are synthesized through the shikimate and acetate pathway, an essential metabolic route that produces aromatic compounds from simple precursors. This process begins with the conversion of shikimic acid into cinnamic acid, a crucial step in flavonoid biosynthesis. The diversity of flavonoids results from catalytic processes that introduce modifications such as hydroxylation, methylation, acetylation, or glycosylation, generating a wide array of compounds [50,81].
The chemical diversity of flavonoids underpins their varied biological activities, with distinct mechanisms of action arising from modifications within their subclasses [49]. Among their activities, antifungal effects have been extensively studied, with targets including fungal cell membranes and biofilm formation. Research indicates that flavonoids may exhibit multiple mechanisms of action, such as binding to ergosterol, inhibiting biofilm development, and inducing oxidative stress, collectively suppressing fungal proliferation. Furthermore, the synergistic potential of flavonoids with existing antifungal drugs has garnered growing interest, as many conventional agents face resistance from fungal strains. These studies suggest that combining flavonoids with antifungals could enhance their efficacy, offering new therapeutic alternatives against fungal infections [10,82].
Tenorio et al. [65] evaluated the antifungal activity of Eugenia uniflora leaf extracts and enriched fractions against three Candida species. The dry extract exhibited MICs of 250, 125, and 31.2 µg/mL against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. auris, respectively. Similarly, the ethyl acetate fraction displayed identical MIC values, whereas the hexane fraction was effective only against C. auris with a MIC of 62.5 µg/mL. The flavonoid-rich fraction showed significant activity against C. albicans (125 µg/mL) and C. glabrata (62.5 µg/mL). The final fraction (LF) achieved an MIC of 125 µg/mL for all three strains tested. Additionally, the ellagic acid-rich fraction demonstrated significant activity against C. glabrata and C. auris, with MICs of 62.5 and 125 µg/mL, respectively. These results highlight the critical role of flavonoids in the antifungal activity of E. uniflora extracts, corroborating findings from other studies on the bioactive potential of these compounds.
The antifungal activity of the ethanolic extract of Annona muricata, with markers such as rutin, was evaluated against C. albicans strains. The study demonstrated that the extract acts on the fungal membrane and cell wall, with an eightfold increase in MIC in the presence of ergosterol and sorbitol. Additionally, the study assessed metabolic activity and membrane integrity, showing reduced C. albicans activity in the presence of the extract, with results comparable to or better than the antifungal nystatin [36]. Flavonoids compounds were reported in [83] with anti-Candida albicans activity. Synergism assays were performed using the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Bauhinia holophylla, combining both extracts with fluconazole and the ethanolic extract with chlorhexidine gluconate. These combinations exhibited synergistic effects and inhibited germ tube formation compared to the individual actions of the components.
da Costa Cordeiro et al. [55] reported the antifungal effect of Spondias tuberosa extract against C. albicans, with MIC values of 2.0 mg/mL, and against C. glabrata, with MIC values of 0.078 mg/mL. The extract showed greater efficacy against C. glabrata. Metabolic activity was also assessed, revealing that the extract induced cellular damage in C. glabrata. These findings highlight the critical role flavonoids play in reducing the virulence of Candida spp.
Meccatti et al. [71] demonstrated that glycolic extracts from Punica granatum, Rosmarinus officinalis, Curcuma longa, and Rosa centifolia were active against fluconazole-resistant strains such as Candida krusei. The antifungal effects were attributed to the presence of hydrolyzable tannins, quercetin derivatives, p-coumaric acid, and curcumin, compounds known to act through disruption of membrane integrity, inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis, suppression of biofilm formation, and induction of oxidative stress, mechanisms that not only kill fungal cells but also interfere with their capacity to persist and invade host tissues.
Expanding on this, Mendonca et al. [72] reported that galloyl-HHDP-glucose (G-HHDP-G), a polyphenol isolated from P. granatum, demonstrated significant synergistic antifungal activity when combined with fluconazole, especially against C. albicans and C. glabrata. This synergy led to a marked reduction in MIC values for both the polyphenol and the antifungal drug, indicating enhanced efficacy and the possibility of dose reduction. In addition, G-HHDP-G inhibited biofilm formation and disrupted mature biofilms, further supporting the role of polyphenols in targeting fungal virulence traits. Together, these studies underscore that the antifungal activity of polyphenols extends beyond direct fungicidal effects and includes the modulation of key pathogenic processes, making them highly relevant in the context of antifungal resistance and therapeutic innovation.
Flavonoids such as avicularin, baicalein, and quercetin have demonstrated significant antifungal activity, particularly against fluconazole-resistant Candida strains, and are increasingly recognized for their ability to impair virulence rather than solely exert fungicidal effects. Avicularin, a quercetin glycoside, significantly inhibited C. albicans adhesion to oral epithelial cells and suppressed hyphal growth, two critical steps for tissue invasion and biofilm formation [62]. These effects were attributed to avicularin’s capacity to interfere with the fungal cytoskeleton and cell wall remodeling, as well as its modulation of surface adhesin expression, thereby reducing colonization and persistence in the host environment. In parallel, baicalein and quercetin, when used alone or in combination, exhibited a synergistic antifungal effect characterized by disruption of membrane integrity, increased permeability, and leakage of intracellular proteins, which together compromise fungal cell viability. Importantly, they also act at the transcriptional level by downregulating virulence-associated genes such as ALS1, ALS3, HWP1, EFG1, SAP4, and CPH1, many of which are directly involved in hyphal formation, biofilm maturation, and immune evasion [68]. This combination of structural and molecular interference suggests a multi-targeted approach that reduces the potential for resistance development.
Additionally, ethanolic and hexane extracts from Capsicum chinense, rich in phenolic acids (e.g., gallic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acids), quercetin glycosides, and capsaicinoids (mainly capsaicin), have shown broad-spectrum antifungal and antivirulence effects [73]. These compounds act by inhibiting the synthesis and function of fungal enzymes, suppressing hemolysin production, a key factor for host cell lysis and iron acquisition, and preventing biofilm formation, particularly in C. glabrata and C. tropicalis. Furthermore, their lipophilic nature allows them to integrate into fungal membranes, disrupting membrane potential and increasing oxidative stress. Such mechanisms not only impair fungal growth but also sensitize cells to conventional antifungal agents, suggesting their potential as adjuvants in antifungal therapy.
Retore et al. [78] investigated the ethanolic extract of Caryocar brasiliense against various Candida species, with particular emphasis on fluconazole-resistant Candida auris strains. The study also characterized the polyphenolic constituents of the extract. Antifungal activity was observed against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and resistant isolates of C. auris, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 32 to >265 µg/mL. Notably, a synergistic effect between the extract and fluconazole was demonstrated against C. auris. The proposed mechanisms of action include inhibition of fungal cell growth, damage to the cell wall, and disruption of plasma membrane integrity, highlighting the extract as a promising candidate for the development of combination therapies.
Tonningianin A, an ellagitannin isolated from the Terminalia genus, was recently investigated for its antifungal potential against Candida species. The study yielded particularly promising results, showing antifungal activity significantly superior to that of fluconazole, one of the most widely used azole antifungals in clinical practice. Tonningianin A exhibited MIC90 values ranging from 2 to 8 µg/mL, whereas fluconazole showed MICs exceeding 64 µg/mL against the same strains. Furthermore, the compound demonstrated potent inhibition of C. albicans biofilm formation as well as disruption of mature biofilms. This study not only validates the antifungal potential of tonningianin A but also reinforces the importance of continued research into novel plant-derived metabolites with promising applications in the treatment of fungal infections, especially for strains that exhibit resistance to fluconazole. The observed reduction in minimum inhibitory concentration upon addition of tonningianin A suggests its ability to circumvent fluconazole resistance mechanisms, indicating a potential synergistic effect that could help reverse resistance. These findings are particularly relevant in the ongoing search for new therapeutic alternatives against drug-resistant Candida strains [84].
Taken together, these findings reinforce the role of flavonoids and related phenolic compounds as multifaceted agents capable of targeting fungal viability, morphology, and virulence, offering a strategic advantage in combating resistant Candida infections.

4.2. Terpene Activity

Terpenes are a class of phytochemicals predominantly found in plants, where they play critical roles in signaling, thermoprotection, and the release of pigments and aromas. Many terpenes possess toxic properties, functioning as chemical defenses against microorganisms and herbivores [85]. Additionally, these compounds exhibit a wide range of biological activities, including antidiabetic, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects. Terpenes are synthesized through the mevalonic acid (MVA) and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways, resulting in the production of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), the precursors of various terpenes [86,87].
The isoprenoid precursors, composed of five carbon atoms, are fundamental to the diverse bioactive properties of terpenes. Structural functionalization and bioactivity variations arise from the action of terpene synthase (TPS) enzymes and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. These enzymes drive the formation of specific compounds within each terpene class, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, and triterpenes, distinguished by the number of carbon atoms in their chemical structures [87,88,89].
Terpenes, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and triterpenes, represent a diverse class of natural products with well-documented antifungal properties, particularly due to their lipophilic nature, which facilitates interaction with fungal membranes. These compounds often exert their effects by disrupting membrane integrity, interfering with mitochondrial function, and modulating oxidative pathways, mechanisms that are particularly valuable in overcoming drug resistance in Candida species [90].
In this context, Zahara et al. [91] isolated linoleic acid and dehydroabietic acid from Bidens bipinnata, both of which demonstrated potent antifungal activity against C. albicans and C. krusei. Linoleic acid, a polyunsaturated fatty acid, integrates into the fungal membrane bilayer, increasing fluidity and permeability, ultimately leading to cell lysis. Dehydroabietic acid, a diterpenoid resin acid, is believed to impair oxidative phosphorylation by targeting mitochondrial respiration, thereby reducing fungal energy production and viability. The study also highlighted a synergistic interaction between these compounds, which may potentiate their therapeutic effect and reduce the required dose for antifungal efficacy.
In another study, Soliman et al. [74] identified dehydrocostus lactone, a sesquiterpene lactone from Saussurea costus, as the main active constituent responsible for marked antifungal activity. This compound induced significant morphological alterations in Candida cells, including membrane rupture, cytoplasmic leakage, and surface wrinkling, as observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Its potent activity against fluconazole-resistant strains and stability when applied to medical-grade cotton suggests it may be a strong candidate for topical antifungal formulations.
Moreover, triterpenoids such as 3-oxo-friedelan-20α-oic acid, betulinic acid, and oleanolic acid, isolated from Solanum torvum, have shown broad-spectrum antifungal action. These compounds displayed MICs as low as 0.016 mg/mL and significantly enhanced the efficacy of fluconazole, reducing its MIC by up to 16-fold in resistant C. albicans isolates [68]. Their mode of action includes disruption of the fungal cell wall and membrane, as well as inhibition of biofilm formation in a concentration-dependent manner. The biofilm-inhibitory property is particularly relevant given that biofilms are a major contributor to antifungal resistance and persistence in host tissues.
Overall, these findings demonstrate that terpenes, through membrane perturbation, mitochondrial targeting, and inhibition of virulence factors such as biofilms, exhibit a multifactorial antifungal profile. Their ability to act synergistically with conventional antifungals and their suitability for both systemic and topical applications position them as promising candidates for integration into next-generation antifungal therapies aimed at combatting resistant Candida infections.
Essential oils, rich in terpenes, also are known for their diverse biological activities, including antifungal properties. Their antifungal action is primarily mediated through the disruption of fungal cell membranes, leading to inhibited growth and cell death [92,93]. The interactions among the various compounds in essential oils can further enhance their biological activities. Given the increasing resistance of fungi to conventional antifungals, the development of studies focusing on plant species containing effective natural compounds against diverse fungal pathogens is critical [94,95]. This approach is particularly relevant in addressing current challenges in antifungal therapy.
Zahabib et al. [96] and colleagues evaluated the methanolic crude extract and various fractions of Salvia rhytidea Benth leaves, with nystatin as a control. The crude extract exhibited superior antifungal activity with MIC values of 15.625 µg/mL for C. albicans, 31.25 µg/mL for C. tropicalis, and 62.5 µg/mL for C. parapsilosis, compared to nystatin (64, 32, and 64 µg/mL, respectively). Regarding fungicidal potential, the extract outperformed nystatin only for C. albicans (31.25 µg/mL vs. 128 µg/mL). Although no phytochemical analysis was conducted, this plant species is known to contain various terpenoid compounds that are likely to contribute to its antifungal activity.
The antivirulence capacity of Origanum vulgare essential oil (Ov-EO) was tested by evaluating its biofilm inhibition, effects on planktonic cells, and synergistic interactions with fluconazole and nystatin. The findings demonstrated activity against two strains of C. albicans (ATCC 90029 and ATCC 10231), C. krusei, and C. dubliniensis, with the most effective action observed against ATCC 90029. Virulence factor inhibition revealed that Ov-EO had a stronger effect on filament inhibition and cellular adhesion compared to the antifungal agents tested. Furthermore, Ov-EO exhibited several synergistic interactions with fluconazole and nystatin [52].
Essential oils from O. glandulosum (Og-EO), A. verticillata (Av-EO), and S. satureioides (Ss-EO), containing compounds similar to those looked at in the previous study, also showed antibiofilm activity against C. albicans and C. glabrata isolates. However, synergistic interactions with amphotericin B were only observed for Og-EO in one C. albicans strain [92].
Malveira et al. [59] studied the essential oil of Croton blanchetianus (Cb-EO) and evaluated its mechanisms of action against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Membrane damage in planktonic cells was more pronounced in C. parapsilosis. Additionally, Cb-EO induced membrane permeabilization in biofilms of both species, with greater efficacy observed in C. albicans biofilms.
In the evaluation of antimicrobial activity against resistant microorganisms, the essential oil of Juniperus thurifera L. demonstrated effective inhibitory action against most of the tested strains, including the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the fungi Candida albicans and Fusarium oxysporum. The selected strains were resistant to conventional antimicrobials such as streptomycin and erythromycin (for bacteria), and fluconazole (for fungi), highlighting the potent effect of the essential oil, with MICs ranging from 0.0475 to 0.095 µg/mL. This promising activity may be associated with the presence of major constituents identified in the oil, including α-thujene, elemol, and muurolol, which were present at the highest concentrations. These results support the potential of J. thurifera essential oil as a therapeutic alternative for combating infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens [76].
These studies highlight how terpenoid compounds can disrupt fungal cell integrity, impairing functionality and inducing apoptosis.

4.3. Alkaloid Activity

Alkaloids are secondary metabolites widely distributed in plants, characterized by the presence of nitrogen atoms in their structures. These compounds exhibit diverse biological activities, including antimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antioxidant properties. Additionally, research highlights their prominent bioactive effects, particularly of a psychoactive nature. Alkaloids are classified based on the number and arrangement of nitrogen groups in their structures [97,98,99].
These compounds are derived from aromatic amino acids and are biosynthesized mainly through the shikimate pathway. This pathway leads to the formation of amino acids such as tryptophan, tyrosine, ornithine, and lysine, which give rise to indole, isoquinoline, tropane, and piperidine alkaloids, respectively [97,100]. Among the most notable alkaloids with bioactive properties are atropine, morphine, codeine, nicotine, and quinine [101].
Due to their structural diversity, alkaloids exhibit various antifungal mechanisms of action, targeting different active sites across fungal species. Additionally, they are known for their low toxicity, making them strong candidates for the development of new antifungal agents. Given the increasing resistance of pathogenic fungi such as Candida spp., alkaloids have shown promise as both inhibitors and fungicidal agents [102,103].
A study by da Silva et al. [63] on Aniba riparia isolated Riparin compounds (I, II, III, and IV) and evaluated their antifungal activity compared to fluconazole. Riparin III exhibited activity against C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei with MIC values of 256, 128, and 256 µg/mL, respectively. When compared to fluconazole, Riparin III demonstrated superior activity against C. albicans (>1024 µg/mL) and C. tropicalis (1024 µg/mL). The other three Riparin isolates showed better antifungal activity against C. albicans (1024 µg/mL) compared to fluconazole. However, for C. krusei, fluconazole exhibited superior efficacy with an MIC of 128 µg/mL. Combination assays between fluconazole and Riparin isolates revealed synergistic effects, with IC50 MICs of 8 µg/mL (Riparin III + fluconazole) and 16 µg/mL (Riparin II + fluconazole) for C. albicans and C. tropicalis, respectively.
Similarly, Bravo-Chaucanés et al. [61] evaluated the susceptibility of ethanolic extract and various fractions of Piper nigrum against C. albicans and C. auris. The study investigated biofilm formation inhibition, morphological transition, and metabolic activity. The extract demonstrated superior effects for both strains compared to the fractions. Regarding biofilm formation, the extract showed higher inhibition in C. auris strains. In terms of yeast-to-hyphae transition in C. albicans, the extract effectively suppressed this process. Additionally, the secretion of hydrolases, which are key virulence factors, was reduced in the presence of ethanolic extract.
A compound isolated from Aerva lanata, methylervine, was explored for its anticandidal potential and possible mechanisms of action. Various C. albicans strains were tested, with significant growth inhibition observed for C. albicans ATCC 90028 (MIC of 32 µg/mL) and ATCC 90029 (MIC of 16 µg/mL). Virulence factors such as biofilm formation inhibition, hyphal formation suppression, spore and cell morphological damage, and fungal DNA damage were also observed, demonstrating that the compound exerts multiple mechanisms of action [104].
As demonstrated in the study by Duan et al. [66], the extract of Pachysandra axillaris Franch and its isolated alkaloids exhibited antifungal activity superior to nystatin against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains. The study elucidated the mechanisms of action of the alkaloid pachysamine M, which included modulation of ergosterol biosynthesis by downregulating the expression of key regulatory enzymes such as those from the ERG gene family, thereby disrupting cell membrane homeostasis. Additionally, structural alterations to the membrane were observed, including increased permeability and reduced fluidity. The treatment also led to the accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), which correlated with mitochondrial dysfunction and the induction of apoptosis.
Alkaloids such as solasonine and solamargine, along with steroidal lactones derived from plants of the Solanaceae family, have demonstrated notable antifungal activity against Candida species, including strains resistant to conventional antifungal agents. These compounds have also shown efficacy against other clinically relevant fungal pathogens, such as Sporothrix brasiliensis, further highlighting their broad-spectrum potential. MIC values for solasonine and solamargine ranged from 0.125 to 1 mg/mL, with both exhibiting fungistatic and fungicidal effects. The antifungal mechanisms are primarily associated with the disruption of fungal cell wall integrity and membrane permeability, mechanisms that are likely shared across different fungal genera. These findings reinforce the therapeutic relevance of Solanaceae-derived alkaloids as versatile antifungal agents capable of targeting both drug-resistant Candida strains and other pathogenic fungi through conserved molecular pathways [105,106].
In the study by Shen et al. [77], the ethanolic extract and fractions of Sarcococca hookeriana demonstrated significant antifungal activity against Candida albicans strains resistant to fluconazole. Phytochemical analysis identified sarcovagine D as the main bioactive compound, particularly enriched in the SHE80 fraction, which exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 µg/mL, clinically relevant when compared to standard antifungal agents. Moreover, the study employed metabolomic profiling coupled with multivariate statistical analysis to correlate chemical composition with antifungal effects. The findings suggest that the active fraction acts by inhibiting biofilm formation and hyphal transition, which are critical virulence factors of C. albicans. Additionally, the extract contributed to wound healing in a murine model of cutaneous candidiasis.
Chelerythrine, a benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloid isolated from Macleaya cordata, has shown potent activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans. Chelerythrine inhibited both biofilm formation and viability of mature biofilms, critical determinants of antifungal resistance and persistence [70]. Mechanistically, its antifungal action involves disruption of cell surface hydrophobicity, inhibition of the cAMP–PKA–Efg1 signaling pathway—which governs hyphal development and biofilm architecture—and induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, leading to oxidative damage and cell death. The ability to modulate both structural and regulatory elements of virulence makes chelerythrine a notable candidate for targeting recalcitrant fungal infections.
Similarly, arborinine and graveoline, two alkaloids isolated from Ruta angustifolia, demonstrated strong fungicidal activity by targeting isocitrate lyase (ICL1), an enzyme integral to the glyoxylate cycle, a metabolic pathway that supports fungal survival in nutrient-limited environments such as inside macrophages or biofilms [69]. By suppressing ICL1 gene and protein expression, these compounds effectively impair the metabolic flexibility of Candida albicans, reducing its ability to adapt, persist, and evade immune responses, thus weakening its pathogenicity.
Further highlighting the antifungal potential of alkaloids, moscatin, a phenanthrene alkaloid from Dendrobium nobile, demonstrated broad-spectrum activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans isolates [75]. Moscatin significantly downregulated genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis (ERG1, ERG11), hyphal development (HWP1, SAP3), and adhesion (ALS2, ALS4), thereby attenuating key virulence factors. Notably, in in vivo murine models, moscatin not only reduced fungal burden and improved survival rates but also contributed to the restoration of gut microbial diversity disrupted by infection, an attribute that supports its potential as both an antifungal and microbiota-preserving therapeutic.
Taken together, the accumulated evidence underscores that polyphenols, terpenes, and alkaloids from medicinal plants exhibit complementary and often synergistic antifungal mechanisms. These include membrane disruption, metabolic inhibition, suppression of virulence gene expression, inhibition of biofilm formation, and synergy with conventional antifungals, positioning them as powerful tools against emerging antifungal resistance. As comprehensively reviewed by Huang et al. [90], many of these compounds act on targets not affected by conventional drugs, and their biosynthetic pathways are increasingly being elucidated. This knowledge enables the use of synthetic biology and metabolic engineering approaches to optimize compound production and enhance pharmacological profiles, paving the way for the development of next-generation antifungal therapies based on plant-derived bioactives.

5. Innovative Technological Approaches for Assessing and Enhancing Antifungal Efficacy

The technological advancements to enhance the availability of natural products with diverse biological activities have become increasingly extensive and crucial for various reasons. The need for different health applications and the investigation of resistance mechanisms contribute to innovations essential for combating fungal infections [39]. Key factors driving this progress include the rise in resistance to synthetic antifungals, the therapeutic efficacy of multiple bioactive compounds, the diversity of therapeutic alternatives, less invasive treatments, and reduced reliance on synthetic drugs [107,108,109].
Studies on mechanisms of action are explored using various techniques, such as microscopy, with key methods including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and fluorescence assays. These techniques allow the visualization of cellular damage, such as changes in membranes and cell walls, caused by treatment with plant-derived compounds [36,59,60,64,104]. Another widely used approach involves molecular assays, such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and transcriptomic analyses, including RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). These methods enable the evaluation of gene expressions associated with cellular composition, molecular functions, and biological processes. Additionally, they allow for the differentiation of gene and protein regulation, facilitating the identification of cellular types involved in responses to fungal infections [110,111,112,113].
Proteomics-, genomics-, and metabolomics-based approaches have revolutionized the identification of new bioactive compounds and the elucidation of their antifungal mechanisms of action. These technologies enable integrated, large-scale analyses of the molecular components of microorganisms, providing critical insights for the development of more effective therapeutic strategies [114]. Genomic and proteomic tools can be used to compare susceptible and resistant fungal strains, allowing for the identification of key proteins and alterations in metabolic pathways. Meanwhile, metabolomics supports the comprehensive characterization of bioactive plant extracts as well as the metabolic profiling of fungal cells. When used in combination, these approaches can optimize the identification of potential antifungal compounds and help predict interactions between plant-derived substances and fungal targets [115].
Molecular modeling techniques, such as molecular docking, are valuable for investigating the potential binding targets of plant-derived compounds. These bioactive markers interact with proteins responsible for fungal cell functionality, exhibiting specific binding capacities that reduce metabolic activity, cause cellular damage, and inhibit cell growth [31,54]. This computational approach has become an indispensable tool in the design and detailed analysis of interactions between candidate compounds and their biological targets. These interactions are primarily evaluated through binding energy, which serves as a critical quantitative parameter to predict molecular affinity and specificity. By simulating molecular docking and assessing the strength of these interactions, computational models help guide the selection of the most promising bioactive compounds for further experimental validation [116].
Regarding the delivery of active compounds, one of the most significant recent methodological advances against fungal infections is the development of antifungal films, particularly those incorporating bioactive plant extracts, either alone or in combination with conventional antifungal agents [117,118]. Among emerging technologies, 3D printing has gained increasing attention for its capacity to produce customized films with innovative applications in surface coating and controlled drug release. These polymer-based delivery systems represent a promising alternative for localized antifungal treatment, particularly in scenarios such as wound healing, catheter protection, and implantable medical devices. However, future studies must address key challenges, including scalability of production, as well as the chemical and physical stability of natural compounds when subjected to formulation processes and long-term storage [119,120].
Pharmaceutical technologies have also been developed to address the increasing resistance mechanisms. Alternative approaches include dispersed systems, nanostructured systems, and biosensors. These drug delivery systems represent a significant advancement in the administration of antifungal agents, overcoming many of the limitations associated with conventional formulations. Nanocarriers function as intelligent delivery vehicles, capable of protecting the active compound from premature degradation while enhancing its distribution to target tissues [121]. This molecular protection is particularly valuable for compounds with low solubility or chemical instability, as it improves bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness. In parallel, biosensors emerge as innovative tools for early detection of fungal infections. By combining biological recognition elements with physicochemical transducers, these systems enable rapid and sensitive identification of specific biomarkers associated with infectious processes [122]. These devices enable the encapsulation of constituents such as essential oils, extracts, fractions, and isolated compounds, improving stability and providing efficient release profiles for infection treatment [108,116].
Another promising tool is artificial intelligence (AI), which is rapidly emerging as a valuable resource for improving both diagnostic strategies and the discovery of novel therapeutic agents. Through data-driven approaches, AI enables morphological pattern recognition, virtual screening, and the prioritization of natural products with potential antifungal activity. These approaches can accelerate the identification of lead compounds effective against Candida infections, thereby complementing traditional methods and enhancing the efficiency of natural product-based drug discovery [123,124]. Research efforts toward new technological applications contribute significantly to providing effective treatment options for infections caused by Candida spp.

6. Conclusions

This study highlighted the diverse resistance mechanisms in Candida spp., including specific targets and mutations contributing to antifungal inefficacy. In response to this, it emphasized the importance of research on medicinal plants and their rich phytochemical compositions, which encompass a wide range of bioactive activities, including antifungal properties. Additionally, various chemical compounds such as polyphenols, terpenes, and alkaloids demonstrated significant antifungal potential, often at low concentrations, exhibiting both fungistatic and fungicidal effects. Many of these studies have elucidated potential mechanisms of action for secondary metabolites, providing valuable insights into fungal cell targets. The challenges in discovering new antifungal agents derived from natural sources remain crucial to addressing the growing issue of antifungal resistance. Advancing this field will be fundamental in mitigating the impact of resistance in fungal infections and expanding the arsenal of effective treatment options.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 408863/2022-6). Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 304234/2021-4), Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE, IBPG-1249-4.03/22) and National Institute of Science and Technology of the Health Economic-Industrial Complex (iCEIS, 406264/2022-8).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco. We also thank the National Institute of Science and Technology of the Health Economic-Industrial Complex for the support offered to carry out this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Denning, D.W. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e428–e438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ryder, N.S.; Dupont, M.-C. Inhibition of squalene epoxidase by allylamine antimycotic compounds. Biochem. J. 1985, 230, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ben-Ami, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Resistance to Antifungal Drugs. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 35, 279–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Campoy, S.; Adrio, J.L. Antifungals. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 133, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Carmo, A.; Rocha, M.; Pereirinha, P.; Tome, R.; Costa, E. Antifungals: From Pharmacokinetics to Clinical Practice. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, A.; Moni, S.S.; Ali, M.; Mohan, S.; Jan, H.; Rasool, S.; Kamal, M.A.; Alshahrani, S.; Halawi, M.; Alhazmi, H.A. Antifungal Activity of Plant Secondary Metabolites on Candida albicans: An Updated Review. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2023, 16, 15–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanchez Armengol, E.; Harmanci, M.; Laffleur, F. Current strategies to determine antifungal and antimicrobial activity of natural compounds. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 252, 126867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moraes, D.C.; Ferreira-Pereira, A. Insights on the anticandidal activity of non-antifungal drugs. J. Mycol. Med. 2019, 29, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ekiert, H.M.; Szopa, A. Biological Activities of Natural Products. Molecules 2020, 25, 5769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fan, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lv, R.; Sun, W.; Ding, W.; Cai, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Qu, W. Candida albicans biofilms: Antifungal resistance, immune evasion, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2022, 60, 106673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ghannoum, M.A.; Rice, L.B. Antifungal Agents Mode of Action, Mechanisms of Resistance, and Correlation of These Mechanisms with Bacterial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Silva, S.; Negri, M.; Henriques, M.; Oliveira, R.; Williams, D.W.; Azeredo, J. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: Biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Negri, M.; Goncalves, V.; Silva, S.; Henriques, M.; Azeredo, J.; Oliveira, R. Crystal violet staining to quantify Candida adhesion to epithelial cells. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2010, 67, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramos, L.S.; Fernandes, M.F.; Santos, H.L.C.; Picao, R.C.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L.S. Candida spp. isolated from recreational coastal waters of Rio de Janeiro—Brazil: Focus on antifungal resistance and virulence attributes. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 947, 174662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Czajka, K.M.; Venkataraman, K.; Brabant-Kirwan, D.; Santi, S.A.; Verschoor, C.; Appanna, V.D.; Singh, R.; Saunders, D.P.; Tharmalingam, S. Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Antifungal Resistance in Pathogenic Candida Species. Cells 2023, 12, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Paiva, J.A.; Pereira, J.M. Treatment of invasive candidiasis in the era of Candida resistance. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2023, 29, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Revie, N.M.; Iyer, K.R.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: Evolution, mechanisms and impact. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 45, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hokken, M.W.J.; Zwaan, B.J.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Verweij, P.E. Facilitators of adaptation and antifungal resistance mechanisms in clinically relevant fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019, 132, 103254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Senna, J.P.; Barradas, T.N.; Cardoso, S.; Castiglione, T.C.; Serpe, M.J.; Silva, K.; Mansur, C.R.E. Dual alginate-lipid nanocarriers as oral delivery systems for amphotericin B. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 166, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith-Craven, M.M.; Dening, T.J.; Basra, A.K.; Hageman, M.J. Enhanced Dissolution of Amphotericin B through Development of Amorphous Solid Dispersions Containing Polymer and Surfactants. J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 113, 2454–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Coste, A.T.; Bachmann, D.; Sanglard, D.; Lamoth, F. Deciphering the Mrr1 Mdr1 Pathway in Azole Resistance of Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e00067-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Teo, J.Q.; Lee, S.J.; Tan, A.L.; Lim, R.S.; Cai, Y.; Lim, T.P.; Kwa, A.L. Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida bloodstream isolates. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Castanheira, M.; Deshpande, L.M.; Davis, A.P.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Pfaller, M.A. Azole resistance in Candida glabrata clinical isolates from global surveillance is associated with efflux overexpression. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 29, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carolus, H.; Pierson, S.; Muñoz, J.F.; Subotic, A.; Cruz, R.B.; Cuomo, C.A.; Van Dijck, P. Genome-Wide Analysis of Experimentally Evolved Candida auris Reveals Multiple Novel Mechanisms of Multidrug Resistance. mBio 2021, 12, e03333-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arendrup, M.C.; Patterson, T.F. Multidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S445–S451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sitterle, E.; Coste, A.T.; Obadia, T.; Maufrais, C.; Chauvel, M.; Sertour, N.; Sanglard, D.; Puel, A.; D’Enfert, C.; Bougnoux, M.E. Large-scale genome mining allows identification of neutral polymorphisms and novel resistance mutations in genes involved in Candida albicans resistance to azoles and echinocandins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hou, X.; Healey, K.R.; Shor, E.; Kordalewska, M.; Ortigosa, C.J.; Paderu, P.; Xiao, M.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, L.Y.; et al. Novel FKS1 and FKS2 modifications in a high-level echinocandin resistant clinical isolate of Candida glabrata. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bing, J.; Du, H.; Guo, P.; Hu, T.; Xiao, M.; Lu, S.; Nobile, C.J.; Chu, H.; Huang, G. Candida auris-associated hospitalizations and outbreaks, China, 2018–2023. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2024, 13, 2302843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Odds, F.C.; Brown, A.J.; Gow, N.A. Antifungal agents: Mechanisms of action. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; Lass-Florl, C. Antifungal drug resistance among Candida species: Mechanisms and clinical impact. Mycoses 2015, 58 (Suppl. 2), 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.; Kong, Y.; Hu, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Yang, M.; Luo, Y. Litsea cubeba Essential Oil: Component Analysis, Anti-Candida albicans Activity and Mechanism Based on Molecular Docking. J. Oleo Sci. 2022, 71, 1221–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sardi, J.C.; Gullo, F.P.; Freires, I.A.; Pitangui, N.S.; Segalla, M.P.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M.; Rosalen, P.L.; Regasini, L.O.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J. Synthesis, antifungal activity of caffeic acid derivative esters, and their synergism with fluconazole and nystatin against Candida spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 86, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar, A.; Jha, A. Antifungals Used Against Candidiasis. In Anticandidal Agents; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 11–39. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pristov, K.E.; Ghannoum, M.A. Resistance of Candida to azoles and echinocandins worldwide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perlin, D.S. Echinocandin Resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61 (Suppl. 6), S612–S617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Campos, L.M.; Lemos, A.S.O.; Diniz, I.O.M.; Carvalho, L.A.; Silva, T.P.; Dib, P.R.B.; Hottz, E.D.; Chedier, L.M.; Melo, R.C.N.; Fabri, R.L. Antifungal Annona muricata L. (soursop) extract targets the cell envelope of multi-drug resistant Candida albicans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 301, 115856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lass-Florl, C.; Steixner, S. The changing epidemiology of fungal infections. Mol. Asp. Med. 2023, 94, 101215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Naeem, A.; Hu, P.; Yang, M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Zheng, Q. Natural Products as Anticancer Agents: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2022, 27, 8367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barone, R.P.; Knittel, D.K.; Ooka, J.K.; Porter, L.N.; Smith, N.T.; Owens, D.K. The production of plant natural products beneficial to humanity by metabolic engineering. Curr. Plant Biol. 2020, 24, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Romanowski, S.; Eustaquio, A.S. Synthetic biology for natural product drug production and engineering. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 58, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zeng, J.; Guo, Y. A comprehensive review of natural products to fight liver fibrosis: Alkaloids, terpenoids, glycosides, coumarins and other compounds. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 888, 173578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Goel, B.; Jain, S.K. Semisynthesis: Bridging natural products and novel anticancer therapies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Rep. 2024, 12, 100218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ferreira, M.R.A.; Santiago, R.R.; Langassner, S.M.Z.; Palazzo de Mello, J.C.; Svidzinski, T.I.E.; Soares, L.A.L. Antifungal activity of medicinal plants from Northeastern Brazil. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 3008–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Souza-Melo, W.O.; Figueiredo-Junior, E.C.; Freire, J.C.P.; Costa, B.P.; Lira, A.B.; Freires, I.A.; Cavalcanti, Y.W.; Lopes, W.S.; Tavares, J.F.; Pessoa, H.L.F.; et al. Phytochemistry, antifungal and antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity of byrsonima gardneriana (A. Juss) extract. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021, 123, 104994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chopra, B.; Dhingra, A.K. Natural products A lead for drug discovery and development. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4660–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guerra, R.N.M.; Oliveira, A.S.; Farias, J.R.; Franco, D.C.G.; Santos, P.G.; Barbosa, N.T.; Muniz, S.B.; Abreu, A.G.; Nascimento, F.R.F. Anacardiaceae Family: Effect of Isolated Compounds and Other Identified Phytochemicals Against Clinically Relevant Candida Species—A Short Review. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Siqueira, M.F.F.; Massaut, K.B.; Thiel, P.R.; Pires, J.B.; Zavareze, E.D.R.; Gandra, E.A.; da Silva, W.P.; Fiorentini, A.M. Development and characterization of active cellulose acetate films with antifungal properties of Thymus vulgaris essential oil for cheese applications: Antifungal potential film with Thymus vulgaris essential oil against cheese fungi. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2025, 56, 1003–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sookkhee, S.; Khamnoi, P.; Sastraruji, T.; Boonkum, S.; Wikan, N.; Nimlamool, W. Synergistic Inhibition of Synbiotic Cultures among Lactobacilli and Plant Extracts Against Vaginal Discharge Causing Candida albicans. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ahmad, A.; Kaleem, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Shafiq, H. Therapeutic potential of flavonoids and their mechanism of action against microbial and viral infections—A review. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jaiswal, N.; Kumar, A. HPLC in the discovery of plant phenolics as antifungal molecules against Candida infection related biofilms. Microchem. J. 2022, 179, 107572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lima, W.G.; Araujo, M.G.F.; Brito, J.C.M.; Castilho, R.O.; Cardoso, V.N.; Fernandes, S.O.A. Antifungal effect of hydroethanolic extract of Fridericia chica (Bonpl.) L. G. Lohmann leaves and its therapeutic use in a vulvovaginal candidosis model. J. Med. Mycol. 2022, 32, 101255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cid-Chevecich, C.; Muller-Sepulveda, A.; Jara, J.A.; Lopez-Munoz, R.; Santander, R.; Budini, M.; Escobar, A.; Quijada, R.; Criollo, A.; Diaz-Dosque, M.; et al. Origanum vulgare L. essential oil inhibits virulence patterns of Candida spp. and potentiates the effects of fluconazole and nystatin in vitro. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2022, 22, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Harley, B.K.; Quagraine, A.M.; Neglo, D.; Aggrey, M.O.; Orman, E.; Mireku-Gyimah, N.A.; Amengor, C.D.; Jato, J.; Saaka, Y.; Fleischer, T.C. Metabolite profiling, antifungal, biofilm formation prevention and disruption of mature biofilm activities of Erythrina senegalensis stem bark extract against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0278096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Souza, L.; de Oliveira Bento, A.; Lourenco, E.M.G.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Oliveira, W.N.; Soares, L.A.L.; Barbosa, E.G.; Rocha, H.A.O.; Chaves, G.M. Mechanism of action and synergistic effect of Eugenia uniflora extract in Candida spp. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0303878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. da Costa Cordeiro, B.M.P.; de Lima Santos, N.D.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; de Araujo, L.C.C.; Junior, A.R.C.; da Conceicao Santos, A.D.; de Oliveira, A.P.; da Silva, A.G.; da Silva Falcao, E.P.; Dos Santos Correia, M.T.; et al. Hexane extract from Spondias tuberosa (Anacardiaceae) leaves has antioxidant activity and is an anti-Candida agent by causing mitochondrial and lysosomal damages. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bvumbi, C.; Chi, G.F.; Stevens, M.Y.; Mombeshora, M.; Mukanganyama, S. The Effects of Tormentic Acid and Extracts from Callistemon citrinus on Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis Growth and Inhibition of Ergosterol Biosynthesis in Candida albicans. Sci. World J. 2021, 2021, 8856147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Essid, R.; Ayed, A.; Djebali, K.; Saad, H.; Srasra, M.; Othmani, Y.; Fares, N.; Jallouli, S.; Abid, I.; Alothman, M.R.; et al. Anti-Candida and Anti-Leishmanial Activities of Encapsulated Cinnamomum verum Essential Oil in Chitosan Nanoparticles. Molecules 2023, 28, 5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Torabi, I.; Sharififar, F.; Izadi, A.; Mousavi, S.A.A. Inhibitory effects of different fractions separated from standardized extract of Myrtus communis L. against nystatin-susceptible and nystatin-resistant Candida albicans isolated from HIV positive patients. Helyon 2022, 8, e09073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Malveira, E.A.; Souza, P.F.N.; Neto, N.A.S.; Aguiar, T.K.B.; Rodrigues, N.S.; Henrique, C.W.B.; Silva, A.F.B.; Lima, L.B.; Albuquerque, C.C.; Freitas, C.D.T. Essential Oil from Croton blanchetianus Leaves: Anticandidal Potential and Mechanisms of Action. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Martínez, O.I.C.; Ortíz, A.A.; Patino, G.S. Antifungal potential of isoespintanol extracted from Oxandra xylopioides diels (Annonaceae) against intrahospital isolations of Candida spp. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bravo-Chaucanés, C.P.; Vargas-Casanova, Y.; Chitiva-Chitiva, L.C.; Ceballos-Garzon, A.; Modesti-Costa, G.; Parra-Giraldo, C.M. Evaluation of Anti-Candida Potential of Piper nigrum Extract in Inhibiting Growth, Yeast-Hyphal Transition, Virulent Enzymes, and Biofilm Formation. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sá, F.A.d.S.; Silva, T.C.; Andrade, W.M.; Ávila, R.I.d.; Valadares, M.C.; Costa, C.R.; Santos, A.S.; Feitas, V.A.Q.; Paula, J.R.d.; Silva, M.d.R.R. Antifungal activity of the ethanolic extract and flavonoid avicularin from Myrcia tomentosa (Aubl.) DC. on virulence factors of Candida species. J. Herb. Med. 2023, 38, 100643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. da Silva, M.L.Q.; de Sousa, G.R.; de Sousa, N.F.; dos Santos, A.T.L.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Filho, J.M.B.; de Souza Ferrari, J.; Scotti, M.T.; da Rocha, J.B.T.; Morais-Braga, M.F.B. In vitro inhibitory activity of Riparins against Candida spp. strains and in silico interaction with multi-drug-resistance proteins. Process Biochem. 2024, 142, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lemos, A.S.O.; Florencio, J.R.; Pinto, N.C.C.; Campos, L.M.; Silva, T.P.; Grazul, R.M.; Pinto, P.F.; Tavares, G.D.; Scio, E.; Apolonio, A.C.M.; et al. Antifungal Activity of the Natural Coumarin Scopoletin Against Planktonic Cells and Biofilms From a Multidrug-Resistant Candida tropicalis Strain. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tenorio, C.J.L.; Dantas, T.D.S.; Abreu, L.S.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Soares, L.A.L. Influence of Major Polyphenols on the Anti-Candida Activity of Eugenia uniflora Leaves: Isolation, LC-ESI-HRMS/MS Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation. Molecules 2024, 29, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Duan, Y.; Wang, Z.J.; Mei, L.N.; Shen, J.S.; He, X.C.; Luo, X.D. Anti-Candida albicans effect and mechanism of Pachysandra axillaris Franch. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2025, 340, 119284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Costa, A.R.; José Weverton, A.-B.; Gonçalves da Silva, T.; Pereira, P.S.; Fernanda de Oliveira Borba, E.; Braga, A.L.; Alencar Fonseca, V.J.; Almeida de Menezes, S.; Henrique da Silva, F.S.; Augusta de Sousa Fernandes, P.; et al. Phytochemical profile and anti-Candida and cytotoxic potential of Anacardium occidentale L. (cashew tree). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 102192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Harley, B.K.; Neglo, D.; Tawiah, P.; Pipim, M.A.; Mireku-Gyimah, N.A.; Tettey, C.O.; Amengor, C.D.; Fleischer, T.C.; Waikhom, S.D. Bioactive triterpenoids from Solanum torvum fruits with antifungal, resistance modulatory and anti-biofilm formation activities against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kamal, L.Z.M.; Adam, M.A.A.; Shahpudin, S.N.M.; Shuib, A.N.; Sandai, R.; Hassan, N.M.; Tabana, Y.; Basri, D.F.; Than, L.T.L.; Sandai, D. Identification of Alkaloid Compounds Arborinine and Graveoline from Ruta angustifolia (L.) Pers for their Antifungal Potential against Isocitrate lyase (ICL1) gene of Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 2021, 186, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, H.; Li, Y.; Zhou, G. Chelerythrine, a major ingredient isolated from Macleaya cordata (Willd.) R. Br. (Papaveraceae), inhibits fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans biofilms. J. Herb. Med. 2023, 42, 100752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Meccatti, V.M.; Santos, L.F.; de Carvalho, L.S.; Souza, C.B.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; Marcucci, M.C.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Oliveira, L.D. Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants’ Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species. Molecules 2023, 28, 2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mendonca, A.M.S.; Monteiro, C.A.; Moraes-Neto, R.N.; Monteiro, A.S.; Mondego-Oliveira, R.; Nascimento, C.E.C.; da Silva, L.C.N.; Lima-Neto, L.G.; Carvalho, R.C.; de Sousa, E.M. Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Punica granatum and Its Galloyl-HHDP-Glucose Compound, Alone or in Combination with Fluconazole, Have Antifungal and Antivirulence Properties Against Candida spp. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Menezes, R.P.; Bessa, M.A.S.; Siqueira, C.P.; Teixeira, S.C.; Ferro, E.A.V.; Martins, M.M.; Cunha, L.C.S.; Martins, C.H.G. Antimicrobial, Antivirulence, and Antiparasitic Potential of Capsicum chinense Jacq. Extracts and Their Isolated Compound Capsaicin. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Soliman, M.F.; Shetaia, Y.M.; Tayel, A.A.; Munshi, A.M.; Alatawi, F.A.; Alsieni, M.A.; Al-Saman, M.A. Exploring the Antifungal Activity and Action of Saussurea costus Root Extracts against Candida albicans and Non-Albicans Species. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, B.; Tan, H.; Sun, X.; Lin, Z.; Chen, X.; Han, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Deng, Y.; et al. Inhibition of Candida albicans virulence by moscatin from Dendrobium nobile lindl. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 197, 107089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lafraxo, S.; El Barnossi, A.; El Moussaoui, A.; Bourhia, M.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Alzahrani, A.; Ait Akka, A.; Choubbane, A.; Akhazzane, M.; Aboul-Soud, M.A.M.; et al. Essential Oils from Leaves of Juniperus thurifera L., Exhibiting Antioxidant, Antifungal and Antibacterial Activities Against Antibiotic-Resistant Microbes. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shen, J.S.; Wang, Z.J.; Duan, Y.; Mei, L.N.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Wei, M.Z.; Wang, X.H.; Luo, X.D. Antifungal bioactivity of Sarcococca hookeriana var. digyna Franch. against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans in vitro and in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 333, 118473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Retore, Y.I.; Lucini, F.; Rial, R.C.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Souza, P.F.N.; Simionatto, S.; Rossato, L. Antifungal activity of Caryocar brasiliense camb. Alone or along with antifungal agents against multidrug-resistant Candida auris. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 330, 118240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mugayi, L.C.; Mukanganyama, S. Antimycobacterial and Antifungal Activities of Leaf Extracts From Trichilia emetica. Scientifica 2024, 2024, 8784390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kaushal, N.; Singh, M.; Singh Sangwan, R. Flavonoids: Food associations, therapeutic mechanisms, metabolism and nanoformulations. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shen, N.; Wang, T.; Gan, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jin, Y.S. Recent advances in natural antifungal flavonoids and their derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 126589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rosa, S.O.; Almeida-Apolonio, A.A.; Santos, J.; Leite, C.D.R.; Cupozak-Pinheiro, W.J.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Castro, T.L.A.; Ferreira, D.G.; Negri, M.; Oliveira, K.M.P. Synergistic potential of Bauhinia holophylla leaf extracts with conventional antifungals in the inhibition of Candida albicans: A new approach for the treatment of oral candidiasis. Arch. Oral Biol. 2024, 170, 106133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, H.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Cao, Y. Activity of thonningianin A against Candida albicans in vitro and in vivo. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cox-Georgian, D.; Ramadoss, N.; Dona, C.; Basu, C. Therapeutic and Medicinal Uses of Terpenes. In Medicinal Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 333–359. [Google Scholar]
  86. Tholl, D. Biosynthesis and biological functions of terpenoids in plants. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 148, 63–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chen, F.; Tholl, D.; Bohlmann, J.; Pichersky, E. The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 2011, 66, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Karunanithi, P.S.; Zerbe, P. Terpene Synthases as Metabolic Gatekeepers in the Evolution of Plant Terpenoid Chemical Diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Jia, Q.; Brown, R.; Kollner, T.G.; Fu, J.; Chen, X.; Wong, G.K.; Gershenzon, J.; Peters, R.J.; Chen, F. Origin and early evolution of the plant terpene synthase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2100361119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Tian, W.; Cui, X.; Tu, P.; Li, J.; Shi, S.; Liu, X. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zahara, K.; Bibi, Y.; Masood, S.; Nisa, S.; Qayyum, A.; Ishaque, M.; Shahzad, K.; Ahmed, W.; Shah, Z.H.; Alsamadany, H.; et al. Using HPLC-DAD and GC-MS Analysis Isolation and Identification of Anticandida Compounds from Gui Zhen Cao Herbs (Genus Bidens): An Important Chinese Medicinal Formulation. Molecules 2021, 26, 5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Benziane, M.Y.; Bendahou, M.; Benbelaid, F.; Khadir, A.; Belhadef, H.; Benaissa, A.; Ouslimani, S.; Mahdi, F.; Muselli, A. Efficacy of endemic Algerian essential oils against single and mixed biofilms of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Arch. Oral Biol. 2023, 145, 105584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, R.; Huang, L.; Feng, X.; Wang, D.; Gunarathne, R.; Kong, Q.; Lu, J.; Ren, X. Unraveling the effective inhibition of α-terpinol and terpene-4-ol against Aspergillus carbonarius: Antifungal mechanism, ochratoxin A biosynthesis inhibition and degradation perspectives. Food Res. Int. 2024, 194, 114915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Vasundhara, M.; Reddy, M.S.; Kumar, A. Secondary Metabolites From Endophytic Fungi and Their Biological Activities. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  95. Gur’eva, Y.A.; Zalevskaya, O.A.; Shevchenko, O.G.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Makarov, V.A.; Kuchin, A.V. Copper(II) complexes with terpene derivatives of ethylenediamine: Synthesis, and antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activity. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 8841–8851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zahabib, Z.F.; Sharififarc, F.; Almania, P.G.N.; Salari, S. Antifungal activities of different fractions of Salvia rhytidea Benth as a valuable medicinal plant against different Candida species in Kerman province (Southeast of Iran). Gene Rep. 2020, 19, 100624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ramos-Valdivia, A.C.; Cerda-Garcia-Rojas, C.M. Biosynthesis of oxindole alkaloids: Recent advances and challenges. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2024, 82, 102648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yao, Z.; Wu, Q.; Sheng, W.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, L.; Tian, X.; Yuan, H.; Gong, L.; Wang, W.; Li, B.; et al. Flavonoidal alkaloids: Emerging targets for drug discovery from Nature’s bounty. Fitoterapia 2024, 177, 106099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Schlager, S.; Drager, B. Exploiting plant alkaloids. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 37, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Letchuman, S.; Madhuranga, H.D.T.; Kaushalya, M.B.L.N.; Premarathna, A.D.; Saravanan, M. Alkaloids Unveiled: A Comprehensive Analysis of Novel Therapeutic Properties, Mechanisms, and Plant-Based Innovations. Intell. Pharm. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kaushik, B.; Sharma, J.; Yadav, K.; Kumar, P.; Shourie, A. Phytochemical Properties and Pharmacological Role of Plants: Secondary Metabolites. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2021, 18, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, H.; Tian, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Wei, S.; Ji, Z.; Aioub, A.A.A. In vivo and in vitro antifungal activities of five alkaloid compounds isolated from Picrasma quassioides (D. Don) Benn against plant pathogenic fungi. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhao, P.; Yu, Z.; Huang, J.P.; Wang, L.; Huang, S.X.; Yang, J. Four unreported aporphine alkaloids with antifungal activities from Artabotrys hexapetalus. Fitoterapia 2024, 174, 105868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Li, R.; Sui, M.; Gao, Z.; Wang, W.; Sun, H.; Dai, J. Antifungal Activity and Multi-Target Mechanism of Action of Methylaervine on Candida albicans. Molecules 2024, 29, 4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Waller, S.B.; Ripoll, M.K.; Pierobom, R.M.; Rodrigues, P.R.C.; Costa, P.P.C.; Pinto, F.; Pessoa, O.D.L.; Gomes, A.D.R.; de Faria, R.O.; Cleff, M.B. Screening of alkaloids and withanolides isolated from Solanaceae plants for antifungal properties against non-wild type Sporothrix brasiliensis. J. Med. Mycol. 2024, 34, 101451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Pinto, F.d.C.L.; Uchoa, D.E.d.A.; Pessoa, E.R.S.; Otília Deusdênia, L.; Braz-Filho, R. Glicoalcaloides antifúngicos, flavonoides e outros constituintes químicos de Solanum asperum. Quim. Nova 2011, 34, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Andrade, J.T.; Lima, W.G.; Sousa, J.F.; Saldanha, A.A.; Nivea Pereira De, S.; Morais, F.B.; Prates Silva, M.K.; Ribeiro Viana, G.H.; Johann, S.; Soares, A.C.; et al. Design, synthesis, and biodistribution studies of new analogues of marine alkaloids: Potent in vitro and in vivo fungicidal agents against Candida spp. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 210, 113048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chaudhary, P.K.; Saini, D.; Mishra, P.; Pandav, K.; Prasad, R. Essential oil active constituents loaded PVA nanofibers enhance antibiofilm activity against Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2024, 98, 105871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Oliveira, J.S.; Ribas, B.R.; Ferro, A.C.; Tasso, C.O.; Camargo, R.; Cavalheiro, A.J.; Jorge, J.H. Cryptocarya moschata fractions decrease planktonic cells and biofilms of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans. Biofouling 2024, 40, 831–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chu, F.; Wu, H.; Li, C.; Qiu, W.; Zang, L.; Wu, D.; Shao, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, C. Transcriptomics analysis reveals the effect of Pulsatilla decoction butanol extract on endoplasmic reticulum and peroxisome function of Candida albicans in hyphal state. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2025, 337, 118826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ghojoghi, A.; Zarei Mahmoudabadi, A.; Khodavaisy, S.; Nazar, E.; Fatahinia, M. Unveiling the genotypic diversity of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis in the oral cavities of drug abusers in Ahvaz, Iran. Gene Rep. 2024, 37, 102073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ma, Y.; Sui, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Yi, G.; Wu, J.; Qiu, S.; Wang, L.; Zhang, A.; He, X. RNA-Seq-Based Transcriptomics and GC-MS Quantitative Analysis Reveal Antifungal Mechanisms of Essential Oil of Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels Seeds against Candida albicans. Molecules 2023, 28, 8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wu, S.; Jia, W.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Huang, C.; Tang, S.; Du, L. Mechanism and bioinformatics analysis of the effect of berberine-enhanced fluconazole against drug-resistant Candida albicans. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ball, B.; Langille, M.; Geddes-McAlister, J. Fun(gi)omics: Advanced and Diverse Technologies to Explore Emerging Fungal Pathogens and Define Mechanisms of Antifungal Resistance. mBio 2020, 11, e01020-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gallart, M.; Dow, L.; Nowak, V.; Belt, K.; Sabburg, R.; Gardiner, D.M.; Thatcher, L.F. Multi-omic investigation identifies key antifungal biochemistry during fermentation of a Streptomyces biological control agent. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 292, 128032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Daoudi, H.; Bouafia, A.; Laouini, S.E.; Meneceur, S.; Fellah, M.; Iqbal, A.; El-Hiti, G.A.; Selmi, B. In vitro and in silico study of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using Nigella sativa extract against SARS-CoV-2 and Candida albicans. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 405, 125059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Jiang, S.; Guo, T.; Liu, J.; Liu, T.; Gong, W. Biodegradable antimicrobial films prepared in a continuous way by melt extrusion using plant extracts as effective components. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cervi, V.F.; Saccol, C.P.; da Rosa Pinheiro, T.; Santos, R.C.V.; Sari, M.H.M.; Cruz, L. A novel nanotechnological mucoadhesive and fast-dissolving film for vaginal delivery of clotrimazole: Design, characterization, and in vitro antifungal action. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 2907–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nour, E.M.; El-Habashy, S.E.; Shehat, M.G.; Essawy, M.M.; El-Moslemany, R.M.; Khalafallah, N.M. Atorvastatin liposomes in a 3D-printed polymer film: A repurposing approach for local treatment of oral candidiasis. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2023, 13, 2847–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Saadatzade, A.; Shabaninezhad, K.; Handali, S.; Moghimipour, E. A novel mucoadhesive film containing probiotic extract for oral candidiasis treatment: Formulation and antifungal evaluation. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 196, 106967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Farjadian, F.; Mirkiani, S.; Ghasemiyeh, P.; Rahbar Kafshboran, H.; Mehdi-Alamdarlou, S.; Raeisi, A.; Esfandiarinejad, R.; Soleymani, S.; Goshtasbi, G.; Firouzabadi, N.; et al. Smart nanogels as promising platform for delivery of drug, gene, and vaccine; therapeutic applications and active targeting mechanism. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 219, 113400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hasannezhad, H.; Bakhshi, A.; Mozafari, M.R.; Naghib, S.M. A review of chitosan role in milk bioactive-based drug delivery, smart packaging and biosensors: Recent advances and developments. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 294, 139248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kolben, Y.; Azmanov, H.; Gelman, R.; Dror, D.; Ilan, Y. Using chronobiology-based second-generation artificial intelligence digital system for overcoming antimicrobial drug resistance in chronic infections. Ann. Med. 2023, 55, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, Y.; Song, M.; Liu, F.; Liang, Z.; Hong, R.; Dong, Y.; Fu, X.; Yuan, W.; Fang, W.; Li, G.; et al. Artificial intelligence using a latent diffusion model enables the generation of diverse and potent antimicrobial peptides. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadp7171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of different Candida species (created in BioRender. Thainá dos Santos Dantas. (2025) https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/6818cb4005105a81ae8b5da0). (A) Morphological forms of Candida; (B) growth characteristics on Chromagar, of Candida (yeast size, hyphae, and pseudohyphae formation).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of different Candida species (created in BioRender. Thainá dos Santos Dantas. (2025) https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/6818cb4005105a81ae8b5da0). (A) Morphological forms of Candida; (B) growth characteristics on Chromagar, of Candida (yeast size, hyphae, and pseudohyphae formation).
Pharmaceutics 17 00687 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the primary pharmacological targets of antifungal drug classes (Created in BioRender. Thainá dos Santos Dantas. (2025) https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/61b20227de229900a4dcec99 and https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/682e3b99a2ab9dda551d0c4a).
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the primary pharmacological targets of antifungal drug classes (Created in BioRender. Thainá dos Santos Dantas. (2025) https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/61b20227de229900a4dcec99 and https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/682e3b99a2ab9dda551d0c4a).
Pharmaceutics 17 00687 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the most prevalent compounds with anti-Candida activity. Polyphenols: gallic acid (1), ellagic acid (2), rutin (3), myricitrin (4) and hyperoside (5). Terpenes: 4-terpineol (6), thymol (7), esoespitanol (8) and limonene (9). Alkaloids: piperin (10), methylamine (11), acid pyroglutamic (12) and riparin III (13).
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the most prevalent compounds with anti-Candida activity. Polyphenols: gallic acid (1), ellagic acid (2), rutin (3), myricitrin (4) and hyperoside (5). Terpenes: 4-terpineol (6), thymol (7), esoespitanol (8) and limonene (9). Alkaloids: piperin (10), methylamine (11), acid pyroglutamic (12) and riparin III (13).
Pharmaceutics 17 00687 g003
Table 1. Resistance mechanisms identified in Candida spp. strains for clinically used antifungal agents.
Table 1. Resistance mechanisms identified in Candida spp. strains for clinically used antifungal agents.
Classes of Antifungal AgentsResistance GenesReferences
Azoles
Fluconazole
CDR1, CDR2 (overexpression of efflux pumps)
MDR1 (drug transporter)
TAC1 (gain-of-function mutations/transcription factors)
ERG3 and ERG11 (genes encoding lanosterol 14α-demethylase)
[21,22,23]
Polyenes
Amphotericin B
ERG3, ERG5, ERG6, ERG11 (target genes—ergosterol biosynthesis)
FKS1
[12,24,25]
Echinocandins
Caspofungin
FKS1 and FKS2 (genes encoding β-1,3-D-glucan synthase)
ERG3 (gene encoding sterol Δ5,6-desaturase)
[24,26,27,28]
Pyrimidine
5-Fluorocytosine
FUMP (blocking formation)
FCY1 and FUR1 (decreased uranil phosphoribosyltransferase-UPRTase activity)
[4,5,11,18]
Table 2. Bioactive Compounds from Plant Species, Mechanisms of Action, and Antifungal Potential Against Candida spp. Strains.
Table 2. Bioactive Compounds from Plant Species, Mechanisms of Action, and Antifungal Potential Against Candida spp. Strains.
Plant/DerivativeCompounds/Identification MethodMechanism of ActionCandida SpeciesMIC (μg/mL)References
Fridericia chica/extractScutellarein-O-glucuronide and 5-methyl-scutellarein-O-glucuronide/UPLC-ESI-MSMorphogenesis
Inhibition
C. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR
C. albicans (ATCC 18804)
C. albicans (ATCC 2091)
C. albicans (SC 5314)
C. albicans Isolates
C. krusei (ATCC 34135) FR+RI
512
512
512
512
256 to 1.024
512
[51]
Annona muricata/extractRutin, kaempferol-3O-rutinoside, xylopine, and caffeic acid/UFLC-QTOF-MSDamage to the Fungal Membrane and EnvelopeC. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR1000[36]
Origanum vulgare/Essential oilThymol, 4-terpineol, and γ-terpinene/GC-MSAnti-Adhesion and Morphogenesis InhibitionC. albicans (ATCC 90029)
C. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR
C. krusei (ATCC 6258) FR+RI
C. dubliniensis (CD36)
0.01
0.97
5.33
2.61
[52]
Erythrina senegalensis/extractNeobavaisoflavone, alpinumisoflavone, cristacarpine, and 6,8-diprenylgenistein/UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MSMultipleC. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR
C. albicans (SC5314) FR
C. glabrata (ATCC 2001) AR
15.63
31.25
7.81
[53]
Eugenia uniflora/extractGallic acid and myricitrin/HPLC-DADBinding to α-14-Sterol Reductase and 1,3-β-Glucan SynthaseC. albicans (ATCC 90028)
C. dubliniesis (CBS 7987)
C. tropicalis (ATCC 13803)
C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019)
C. glabrata (ATCC 2001) AR
312.5
312.5
625
312.5
625
[54]
Spondias tuberosa/extractHyperoside and gallic acid/HPLC-DAD and NMRHigh Levels of Mitochondrial Superoxide Anion, Hyperpolarization, and Lysosomal Membrane DamageC. albicans Isolates
C. glabrata
2000
78
[55]
Callistemon citrinus/extractTormentic acid/NMRMembrane DamageC. albicans (NCPF 3255) FR100[56]
Cinnamomum verum/essential oilCinnamaldehyde, 1,8-cineole, and α-copaene/GC-MSUnknownC. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR62.5[57]
Brysonima gardneriana/extractPyroglutamic acid, eucalyptol, and octanoic acid/GC-MSMembrane Disruption and Oxidative StressC. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR
C. glabrata (ATCC 90030)
C. krusei (ATCC 6258) FR+RI
125
125
250
[44]
Myrtus communis/extract and fractionTerpenes/Total terpenoids contentUnknownC. albicans (ATCC 76645) FR
C. albicans resistant to nystatin
62.5 to 250
62.5 to 250
[58]
Croton blanchetianus/essential oilLimonene, sabinene, terpinen-4-ol, borneol/GC-MS-MSPlasma Membrane Damage and Oxidative StressC. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR
C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019)
50[59]
Oxandra xylopioides/extractIsoespintanol/GC-MSPlasma Membrane DamageC. albicans Isolates
C. auris
C. glabrata
C. tropicalis
452.4 to 493
453.5
496
450.4 to 503.3
[60]
Piper nigrum/extract and fractionPiperine/LC-MS QqQCell Wall LysisC. albicans (SC5314) FR
C. albicans (CAAL256) CI+FR
C. auris (CAAU435) CI
C. auris (CAAU537) CI+FR+ABR
2048
1024
512
512
[61]
Myrcia tomentosa/extract and fractionAvicularin/NMRAnti-Adhesion and Morphological AlterationsC. albicans (ATCC 90028)
C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019)
32
16
[62]
Aniba riparia/
isolated
Riparin/NMR and ESI-MSEfflux Pump Inhibition (MDR1, CDR1, and CDR2 Genes)C. albicans (ATCC 10231) AR
C. tropicalis (ATCC 13803)
C. krusei (ATCC 34135) FR+RI
256
128
256
[63]
Mitracarpus frigidus/extract and fractionScopoletin/HPLC-PDACell Wall, Plasma Membrane Sterols, and Efflux Pump InhibitionC. tropicalis (ATCC 28707) ABR50[64]
Eugenia uniflora/extractMyricitrin, ellagic acid, and gallic acid/LC-ESI-HRMS/MSAssociated with Cell Wall InhibitionC. albicans (ATCC 90028)
C. glabrata (ATCC 2001) FR
C. auris (CDC B11903) FR+ABR
250
125
31.2
[65]
Pachysandra axillaris/extractSarcovagine D, Epipachysamine D, Pachysamine M/NMR/HR-ESI-MSInhibition of Ergosterol Biosynthesis (ERG4, ERG7, ERG9, ERG1, and ERG24), Disruption of Cell Membrane Homeostasis, and Accumulation of Oxidative StressC. albicans (SC5314) FR4[66]
Anacardium occidentale/extractGallic acid, luteolin and agathisflavone/
UPLC-DAD/QTOF-MS
Increased Permeability of the Fungal MembraneC. albicans (INCQS 40006) FR
C. krusei (INCQS 40095) FR
C. tropicalis (INCQS 40042) FR
376.6
395.3
352.3
[67]
Solanum torvum/extract and fraction3-oxo-friedelan-20α-oic acid, betulinic acid, oleanolic acid and sitosterol-3-β-D-glucopyranoside/NMRDisruption of the Fungal cell Wall and MembraneC. albicans Isolates FR250–2000[68]
Ruta angustifolia/extract and fractionAborimine and graveoline/NMR/HPLCInhibition of the ICL1 GeneC. albicans (ATCC 10231) FR250–500[69]
Acleaya cordata/extractChelerythrine/HPLCReducing the CSH, Inhibiting the cAMP Pathway, Increased cell Membrane Permeability and ROS AccumulationC. albicans (SC5314) FR
C. albicans (CA16) CI+FR
2–128
8–128
[70]
Rosmarinus officinalis/extractp-coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid and gallotannin/
HPLC-DAD
Increase Mitochondrial Depolarization, Production of Reactive Oxygen Species, and Causes DNA FragmentationC. albicans (ATCC 18804)
C. ddubliniensis
(ATCC MYA 646)
C. tropicalis (ATCC 13803)
C. krusei (ATCC 6258) FR+RI
25,000–50,000[71]
Punica granatum/extractGallotanin, quercentin/HPLC-DAD50,000
Rosa centifolia/extractDerivative of quercetin, gallic acid, gallotannins, p-coumaric acid/HPLC-DAD12,500–25,000
Curcuma longa/extractCurcumin/HPLC-DAD25,000
Punica granatum/fractionGalloy-hexahydroxydiphenoyl-glucose/HPLC-DAD-ESI-IT/MSReducing Candida Phospholipase ProductionC. albicans (ATCC 90028)
C. albicans CAS CI
C. glabrata (ATCC 2001)
C. glabrata FJF CI
>500
>500
125
31.25
[72]
Capsicum chinense/extractCapsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin/LC-ESI-MSLyse of the Cell Wall, Inhibition of Hemolytic ActivityCandida albicans
(ATCC 90028 and CI)
Candida glabrata
(ATCC 2001 and CI) FR
Candida krusei
(ATCC 6258 and CI) FR
Candida parapsilosis
(ATCC 22019 and CI)
Candida tropicalis
(ATCC 13803 and CI)
1500–3000
3000
[73]
Saussurea costus/extractsDehydrocostuslactone, 11,14,17-eicosatrienoic acid methyl ester/GC/MSCell Wall DamageC. albicans (ATCC 10231) FR
C. tropicalis (MH 445555)
C. parapsilosis (MH 445556)
C. pseudotropicalis
(Biochemical ID)
C. guillimondii (Biochemical ID)
Candida Isolates
1000–3000
1000–4000
1000–3500
250–4500
1000–3000
200–4500
[74]
Dendrobium nobileMoscatinModify Ergosterol Synthesis Pathway Genes (ERG1, ERG3, and ERG11), Heat Shock Protein Genes (HSP12, HSP21, HSP30, and HSP70), and Agglutinin-like Sequence Families (ALS2 and ALS4)C. albicans (SC5314) AR
C. albicans Isolates FR
20
40–80
[75]
Jeniperus thurifera L./essencial oilα-thujene, elemol and muurolol/GC-MSUnknownC. albicans (ATCC 10231) FR0.095[76]
Sarcococca hookeriana/extract and fractionSarcovagine D/
UPLC-QTOF-MS
Disruption of the Cell Membrane and Biofilms; Interference With the Sphingolipid Pathway.C. albicans (08030401) FR16[77]
Caryocar brasiliense/extractPolyphenols/
spectrophotometer
Inhibition of Cell Growth, Damage to the Cell Wall and Plasma Membrane.C. albicans (ATCC 90029) 5FR
C. tropicalis (ATCC 750)
C. auris FR Isolates
32–128[78]
Trichilia emetica/extractsGamabufatolin, 9-octadecen-1-ol(Z), octadecanoic acid, rescinnamine, cis-9-tetradecen-1-ol, toluene and 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol/CG-MSInhibition of Cell Wall Synthesis and Leakage of Nucleic Acids from the Plasma MembraneC. albicans (NCPF 3255) FR
C. tropicalis Isolates
1000
250
[79]
ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; CDC: Centers for Disease Control; CD: Institute’s Adolfo Lutz Culture Collection; NCPF: National Collection of Pathogenic Fungi; National Institute for Quality Control in Health (INCQS); AR: azole-resistant; FR: fluconazole-resistant; RI: intrinsically resistant; ABR: amphotericin B-resistant; CI: clinical isolate; 5FR: 5-flucytosine-resistant; Candida albicans: ATCC 10231 (azole-resistant); SC 5314; NCPF 3255; INCQS 40006; 08030401 and ATCC 76645 (fluconazole-resistant); clinical isolate CAAL256 and CA16 (fluconazole-resistant); ATCC 90029 (5-flucytosine-resistant); Candida krusei: ATCC 6258 and ATCC 34135 (both intrinsically fluconazole-resistant); INCQS 40095 (fluconazole-resistant); Candida glabrata: ATCC 2001 (azole-resistant); Candida auris: CDC B11903 and clinical isolate CAAU537 (both resistant to fluconazole and amphotericin B); Candida tropicalis: INCQS 40042 (fluconazole-resistant); HR-ESI-MS: high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; UPLC-ESI-MS: ultra-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; UFLC-QTOF-MS: ultra-fast liquid chromatography–quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; GC-MS: gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS: ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization/quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry; HPLC-DAD: high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detector; NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance; LC-MS QqQ: liquid chromatographic-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry; ESI-MS: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; LC-ESI-HRMS/MS: liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dantas, T.d.S.; Machado, J.C.B.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Soares, L.A.L. Bioactive Plant Compounds as Alternatives Against Antifungal Resistance in the Candida Strains. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060687

AMA Style

Dantas TdS, Machado JCB, Ferreira MRA, Soares LAL. Bioactive Plant Compounds as Alternatives Against Antifungal Resistance in the Candida Strains. Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(6):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dantas, Thainá dos Santos, Janaina Carla Barbosa Machado, Magda Rhayanny Assunção Ferreira, and Luiz Alberto Lira Soares. 2025. "Bioactive Plant Compounds as Alternatives Against Antifungal Resistance in the Candida Strains" Pharmaceutics 17, no. 6: 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060687

APA Style

Dantas, T. d. S., Machado, J. C. B., Ferreira, M. R. A., & Soares, L. A. L. (2025). Bioactive Plant Compounds as Alternatives Against Antifungal Resistance in the Candida Strains. Pharmaceutics, 17(6), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop