Next Article in Journal
Metronidazole-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles with Antimicrobial Activity Against Clostridium perfringens
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Different Polysaccharide–Iron Complex Preparations In Vitro and In Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of V9302, a Competitive Antagonist of Transmembrane Glutamine Flux on Reversal of Resistance in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Enzymatic and Computational Assessments of Pyrazole–Isatin and Pyrazole–Indole Conjugates as Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Arthritic, and Anti-Inflammatory Agents

by
Ahmed M. Naglah
1,*,
Abdulrahman A. Almehizia
1,
Mohammed Ghazwani
2,
Asma S. Al-Wasidi
3,
Abdelrahman A. Naglah
4,
Wael M. Aboulthana
5 and
Ashraf S. Hassan
6,*
1
Drug Exploration & Development Chair (DEDC), Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 1882, Abha 61441, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
4
Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
5
Biochemistry Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt
6
Organometallic and Organometalloid Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(3), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030293
Submission received: 3 February 2025 / Revised: 20 February 2025 / Accepted: 21 February 2025 / Published: 23 February 2025

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Recently, the prevalence of diseases such as diabetes, arthritis, and inflammatory diseases, along with their complications, has become a significant health problem. This is in addition to the various biomedical applications of pyrazole, isatin, and indole derivatives. Accordingly, cooperation will continue between chemistry scientists, pharmaceutical scientists, and human doctors to produce hybrid compounds from pyrazole with isatin or indole possessing biological activities as anti-diabetic, anti-arthritic, and anti-inflammatory agents. Methods: The two series of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were prepared from our previous works via the direct reaction of 5-amino-pyrazoles 10ad with N-alkyl isatin 11a,b, and 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (13), respectively, using the previously reported procedure. The potential biological activities of 12ah and 14ad as anti-diabetic, anti-arthritic, and anti-inflammatory agents were assessed through estimated inhibition percentage (%) and the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) using methods described in the literature. Further, the computational assessments of 12ah and 14ad such as toxic doses (the median lethal dose, LD50), toxicity classes, drug-likeness model scores (DLMS), molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP) maps, polar surface area (PSA) maps, and topological polar surface area (TPSA) values were predicted using available free websites. Results: The in vitro enzymatic assessment results showed that pyrazole–indole conjugate 14b possesses powerful activities against (i) α-amylase (% = 65.74 ± 0.23, IC50 = 4.21 ± 0.03 µg/mL) and α-glucosidase (% = 55.49 ± 0.23, IC50 = 2.76 ± 0.01 µg/mL); (ii) the protein denaturation enzyme (% = 49.30 ± 0.17) and against the proteinase enzyme (% = 46.55 ± 0.17) with an IC50 value of 6.77 ± 0.01 µg/mL; (iii) the COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes with an IC50 of 5.44 ± 0.03, 5.37 ± 0.04, and 7.52 ± 0.04, respectively, which is almost close to the IC50 of the indomethacin and zileuton drugs. Also, the computational assessment results showed (i) the conjugate 14b possesses lipophilic surface properties thus can cross cell membranes, and is effective for treatment; (ii) all the conjugates possess a TPSA value of more than 140 Å2 thus possess good intestinal absorption. Conclusions: The two series of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were synthesized from our previous works. The results of these in vitro enzymatic and computational assessments concluded that the pyrazole–indole conjugate 14b possesses powerful activities against various studied enzymes and possesses good computational results. In the future, our research team will present in vitro, in vivo biological, and computational assessments to hopefully obtain effectual agents such as anti-diabetic, anti-arthritic, and anti-inflammatory.

1. Introduction

Diabetes is a modern-day challenge caused by a malfunction in insulin secretion from the pancreas [1]. Insulin regulates glucose levels in the body [2]. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease that usually affects children and young adults. It occurs when the immune system attacks the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas, leading to a lack of insulin production. This results in high blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia) as glucose cannot be properly transported into tissues. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a common form of diabetes characterized by high blood sugar levels due to reduced insulin sensitivity and secretion, often influenced by lifestyle factors [3]. The protocols for α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors are used in the treatment of diabetes. Acarbose acts as an inhibitor for α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes [4].
Oxidative stress (OS) is caused by free radicals, which can result in damage to cells and tissues. Complications related to oxidative stress include cancer, osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, and inflammatory diseases [5,6]. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a type of inflammatory disease that results from a chronic condition [7]. The inhibition protocols of proteinase denaturation and proteinase are used in the treatment of arthritis [8]. Anti-inflammatory agents work by inhibiting COX-2, COX-1, and 5-LOX, making them effective strategies for treating inflammation [9].
Recently, molecular hybridization has become one of the important tools for drug discovery [10], involving the merging of two or more pharmacophores that possess biological activities into a single molecule [11]. For instance, Abdelazeem et al. [12] reported the synthesis of some sulfonamide–pyrazole hybrids as anti-diabetic and anti-Alzheimer agents. Hassan et al. [13] reported the synthesis of novel pyrazoline-benzofuran-pyrazole derivatives that exhibited powerful cytotoxicity. Shaldam et al. [14] reported the synthesis of isatin–sulfonamide hybrids as anticancer agents through the inhibitory effect against the VEGFR-2 enzyme.
In the last five years, pyrazole derivatives have demonstrated significant biological and pharmacological activities [15,16,17]. For example, pyrazole-triazole derivative 1 (IC50 = 95.85 ± 0.92 µM) possesses anti-diabetic properties against the α-glucosidase enzyme [18]. Thiophene-pyrazole derivative 2 demonstrated powerful anti-inflammatory activities against cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) enzyme with an IC50 of 10.21 µM and against cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme with an IC50 of 1.76 µM [19]. The pyrazolyl-chalcone derivative 3 demonstrated powerful anticancer activities against pancreatic cancer (PaCa-2) cells with an IC50 of 13.0 μg/mL and it also induces cell cycle arrest at the S and G2/M phases in the treated PaCa-2 cells and causes DNA damage [20] (Figure 1).
On the other hand, isatin derivatives possess biological activities and medicinal applications [20,21,22]. Isatin-hydrazide conjugate 4 possesses significant anti-diabetic properties against α-amylase enzyme with an IC50 of 19.6 µg/mL and also against α-glucosidase with an IC50 of 14.8 µg/mL [23]. Schiff base-isatin derivative 5 showed antioxidant activities with an IC50 of 9.76 ± 0.03 µM [24]. The isatin-thiazol-4-yl sulfonamide derivative 6 possesses significant anti-inflammatory properties with edema inhibition (EI = 38.50%). Additionally, derivative 6 showed potent inhibition with selectivity against the COX-2 enzyme, with an IC50 of 8.26 µM and an SI of 2.65. Furthermore, it demonstrated a good fit in the COX-2 binding site with a docking energy score of −11.45 kcal/mol [25] (Figure 1).
Moreover, indoles are privileged scaffolds in numerous derivatives with important biological properties [26,27,28,29,30]. The indole–thiazolidine-2,4-dione hybrid 7 displayed powerful α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with an IC50 of 2.35 ± 0.11 μM. It also suppressed glucose levels in diabetic mice through in vivo anti-diabetic investigations [31]. The 1-methylsulfonylindole-hydrazinecarbothioamide derivative 8 possesses multiple biological applications. It demonstrates selective antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, antioxidant activity, and anti-inflammatory activity by reducing TNF-α levels, and high power towards COX-2 enzyme inhibition [32]. The pyridyl-indole derivative 9 exhibited antimalarial activity [33] (Figure 1).
There are various pyrazole, isatin, or indole-based drugs available on the market, highlighting their significance in medicine and pharmaceutical chemistry [34,35,36,37]. Remogliflozin etabonate (A) is an example of a pyrazole-based drug. Remogliflozin etabonate possesses anti-diabetic properties that can be used for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes [38] and is a potent and selective inhibitor of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) [39]. Semaxanib (B) is an example of an isatin-based drug used for the treatment of colorectal cancer and lung cancer that acts as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor [40]. Indomethacin (C) is an example of an indole-based drug. Indomethacin is a powerful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that possesses antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic properties to treat various conditions [41] (Figure 2).
According to information on
(i) Diabetes mellitus and inflammatory diseases;
(ii) The various biological activities of pyrazole, isatin, and indole derivatives, particularly their anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory properties;
(iii) Based on our previous studies focusing on the evaluation of compounds against diseases [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].
Based on the three points above, we have encouraged in this study for:
(1) Synthesizing two series of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad from our previous works.
(2) Evaluating their biological activities such as anti-diabetic, anti-arthritic, and anti-inflammatory activities.
(3) Performing the computational assessments including toxic doses (median lethal dose, LD50), toxicity classes, drug-likeness model scores (DLMS), molecular lipophilicity potential maps, polar surface area (PSA) maps, and topological polar surface area (TPSA) values.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemistry

5-Amino-pyrazoles 10ad [50], N-alkyl isatin 11a,b [51], and the target conjugates, pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad, were prepared according to the reported procedures from our previous works [52].
The procedures for pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad prepared were provided in the Supplementary File [52]. Also, the chemical structure of the target conjugates was confirmed through their spectral data, which are provided in the Supplementary File [52]. Additionally, the charts of 12ah and 14ad were provided in the Supplementary File [52].

2.2. In Vitro Enzymatic Assessments

The anti-diabetic [53,54], anti-arthritic [55,56], and anti-inflammatory [57,58] potential activities of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were evaluated by determining the inhibition percentage (%), and the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) following documented procedures in the literature.
The in vitro enzymatic assessments approaches were provided in the Supplementary File.
Statistical analysis (see details in the Supplementary File).

2.3. Computational Assessments

Computational toxicity estimations of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were predicted using the ProTox-3.0 website accessed on 27 October 2024 [59].
The drug-likeness model scores (DLMS) were predicted using the Molsoft web (https://www.molsoft.com/mprop/) accessed on 27 October 2024 [60].
The Molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP) [61] and the polar surface area (PSA) [62] maps were calculated using the Molinspiration Galaxy 3D Structure Generator v2023.08 available on the Molinspiration website: (https://www.molinspiration.com/cgi/galaxy) accessed on 21 October 2024.
Also, topological polar surface area (TPSA) values were predicted by using the Molinspiration website (https://www.molinspiration.com) accessed on 21 October 2024 [63].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

In this section, we describe the synthesis of two series from our previous works [52]: pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad through direct reactions. The first series, pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah, was prepared by reacting 5-amino-pyrazoles 10ad with N-alkyl isatin 11a,b. The second series, pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad, was prepared by reacting 5-amino-pyrazoles 10ad with 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (13) [52] (Scheme 1).
All 12ah and 14ad compounds are known and reported from our previous works [52]. The hydrogen and carbon structures of the two series, 12ah and 14ad, were confirmed through spectral analyses [52]. The characterized spectral data and charts of the two series were provided in the Supplementary File [52].

3.2. In Vitro Enzymatic Assessments

3.2.1. In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Assessment

In vitro anti-diabetic assessment of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes was assessed by using the reported methods in the literature [53,54]. The results of in vitro anti-diabetic assessment of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad are listed in Table 1.
Figure 3A plots the inhibition percentage (%) and Figure 3B plots the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the anti-diabetic activities of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and the standard anti-diabetic agent (acarbose).
In the case of the α-amylase enzyme, the inhibition percentage (%) of the pyrazole–isatin series 12ah ranged from 19.19 ± 0.03 to 22.47 ± 0.03 compared to acarbose (72.58 ± 0.16%) as the standard drug. Additionally, the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the pyrazole–isatin series 12ah (from IC50 = 12.32 ± 0.13 to IC50 = 14.42 ± 0.16 µg/mL) were higher than the median inhibitory concentration of acarbose (IC50 = 3.81 ± 0.04 µg/mL). This indicates that this series is less active than acarbose against the α-amylase enzyme. Also, the pyrazole–indole series 14ad exhibits inhibition percentages ranging from 34.84 ± 0.23 to 65.74 ± 0.23. Additionally, it has median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) close to acarbose (IC50 = 3.81 ± 0.04 µg/mL). This signifies that this series is active against the α-amylase enzyme and pyrazole–indole 14b is the most active among the two tested compounds, pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
In the case of the α-glucosidase enzyme, the pyrazole–indole 14b (55.49 ± 0.23%) showed a high inhibition percentage among the two tested series, pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad, compared to acarbose (62.33 ± 0.16%) as the standard drug. Also, pyrazole–indole 14b possesses IC50 of 2.76 ± 0.01 µg/mL which is close to acarbose (IC50 = 2.45 ± 0.02 µg/mL)
Finally, we can deduce that derivative 14b possesses the most anti-diabetic activity among the two series tested against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes.
The conjugate 14b possesses two scaffolds, 4-methylphenyl and phenyl, which have a positive effect on carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes. This result is consistent with previous findings by Nkoana et al. [64] and Sharma et al. [65] regarding the ability of these two scaffolds, 4-methyl phenyl and phenyl, to inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes.

3.2.2. In Vitro Anti-Arthritic Assessment

In vitro anti-arthritic assessment of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad against protein denaturation and proteinase enzymes was estimated by using the methods reported in the literature [55,56]. The results of the in vitro anti-arthritic assessment of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad are listed in Table 2.
It was found that the pyrazole–indole 14b (49.30 ± 0.17%) possesses a high inhibition percentage effect on protein denaturation compared to the proficiency of diclofenac sodium (48.75 ± 0.04%). Also, the same product, 14b, exhibits a high inhibition percentage of 46.55 ± 0.17% and an IC50 value of 6.77 ± 0.01 µg/mL against the proteinase enzyme, which is more potent than diclofenac sodium (46.00 ± 0.04% and IC50 = 6.85 ± 0.022 µg/mL).
This signifies that this derivative 14b possesses the most anti-arthritic activity against the two enzymes, protein denaturation and proteinase.

3.2.3. In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Assessment

The in vitro anti-inflammatory assessment of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad against cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) enzymes was estimated by using the mentioned methods in the literature [57,58]. The results of the in vitro anti-inflammatory assessment of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-inflammatory agents against COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes are recorded in Table 3.
Figure 4A plots the inhibition percentage (%) and Figure 4B plots the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the anti-inflammatory assessments of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-inflammatory agents. Indomethacin is the standard anti-inflammatory agent against COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes while zileuton is against the 5-LOX enzyme.
The results from Table 3, Figure 4A,B revealed that the pyrazole–isatin series 12ah possesses a weak range of inhibition percentages from 17.62 ± 0.04 to 21.15 ± 0.04 against the COX-1 enzyme, from 19.72 ± 0.04 to 23.40 ± 0.04 against the COX-2 enzyme, and from 9.57 ± 0.04 to 13.25 ± 0.04 against the 5-LOX enzyme. These ranges were compared with indomethacin as the standard drug with inhibition percentages of 80.51 ± 0.07 against the COX-1 enzyme and 82.76 ± 0.07 against the COX-2 enzyme and with zileuton as the standard drug with an inhibition percentage of 72.61 ± 0.07 against the 5-LOX enzyme. Also, the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the pyrazole–isatin series 12ah are higher than the IC50 of indomethacin and zileuton; this refers to their weak activities as anti-inflammatory agents.
On the other hand, the pyrazole–indole series 14ad possesses high inhibition percentages against the COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes with ranges from 35.07 ± 0.26 to 69.83 ± 0.26, 37.32 ± 0.26 to 72.08 ± 0.26, and from 27.17 ± 0.26 to 61.93 ± 0.26, respectively, compared with the inhibition percentages of indomethacin against COX-1 (% = 80.51 ± 0.07) and COX-2 (% = 82.76 ± 0.07), and with the inhibition percentage of zileuton against 5-LOX (% = 72.61 ± 0.07). Additionally, the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the pyrazole–indole series 14ad are lower than the IC50 of the indomethacin and zileuton; this refers to their powerful activities as anti-inflammatory agents.
Interestingly, the pyrazole–indole derivative 14b possesses powerful anti-inflammatory activity against the COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes with an IC50 of 5.44 ± 0.03, 5.37 ± 0.04, and 7.52 ± 0.04, respectively. The IC50 of the pyrazole–indole derivative 14b is almost closed with the IC50 of indomethacin (IC50 = 5.50 ± 0.01 for COX-1 enzyme and IC50 = 4.68 ± 0.02 for COX-2 enzyme) and zileuton (IC50 = 6.83 ± 0.02 for 5-LOX enzyme). The presence of the two scaffolds, 4-methylphenyl and phenyl, in compound 14b has a clear effect on the inhibition of COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes [66].
Statistical analysis of the biological assessments was performed, and the results were recorded in Table 4. It was observed that the anti-diabetic assessment (inhibition % of α-amylase and α-glucosidase), anti-arthritic assessment (inhibition % of protein denaturation and proteinase), and anti-inflammatory assessments (inhibition % of COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX) are positively correlated with each other at p ≤ 0.05. When the anti-diabetic assessment increases, the anti-arthritic and anti-inflammatory assessments also increase.

3.3. Computational Assessments

3.3.1. Toxicity Prediction

Computational toxicity estimations, such as toxic doses (the median lethal dose, LD50) and toxicity classes of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad, were predicted using the ProTox-3.0 website (https://tox-new.charite.de/protox_II/index.php?site=home) accessed on 27 October 2024 [59]. The computational toxicity estimation results are recorded in Table 5. These results indicate that the two target series, pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad, have a median lethal dose (LD50) value of 1000 mg kg−1. As a result, both series were classified as class IV (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000) which refers to that harmful if swallowed.

3.3.2. The Drug-Likeness Model Scores (DLMS) Prediction

The drug-likeness model scores (DLMS) of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were predicted using the Molsoft web (https://www.molsoft.com/mprop/) accessed on 27 October 2024 [60]. The results of the computational DLMS are listed in Table 5.
The rule for estimating the drug-likeness model score of the target compounds is based on positive and negative values [67] as follows:
(i) The compound is considered drug-like if the drug-likeness score has a positive value.
(ii) The compound is considered non-drug-like if the drug-likeness score has a negative value.
According to this rule, all pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah can be classified as drug-like compounds because these derivatives have positive drug-likeness scores ranging from 0.70 to 0.85. Therefore, the pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah show potential as drug candidates. Figure 5 represents the plotting of the drug-likeness model scores for the two pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12e and 12g which have the highest positive values of 0.85 and 0.83, respectively. Unfortunately, we found that the drug-likeness scores of the pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad are negative, so this series is classified as non-drug-like candidates.

3.3.3. Molecular Lipophilicity Potential (MLP) Maps

The molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP) maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were calculated using the Molinspiration Galaxy 3D Structure Generator v2023.08 available on the Molinspiration website: https://www.molinspiration.com/cgi/galaxy (accessed on 21 October 2024) [61]. Figure 6 displays the MLP maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad.
The molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP) maps on the molecular surfaces of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad indicates the lipophilic and hydrophilic parts. The different colors of the MLP maps refer to lipophilic and hydrophilic areas as follows [68]:
(i) The most lipophilic area is represented by a blue color.
(ii) The intermediate lipophilic area is represented by pink.
(iii) The most hydrophilic area is indicated by yellow.
(iv) The intermediate hydrophilic area is shown in green.
From Figure 6, which displays the molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP) maps of the conjugates 12ah and 14ad, we observed the following:
  • The three conjugates 12c, 12d, and 12g exhibit similar lipophilic and hydrophilic properties, with the lipophilic regions covering most of the surface area except for three specific areas: the carbonyl of amide (-NH-CO-), CH3O-p-C6H4-NH-, and carbonyl of isatin (C=O).
  • The three conjugates 12a, 12b, and 12e possess similar surface properties (lipophilic and hydrophilic). The intermediate hydrophilic area appears at the two positions: the carbonyl of amide (-NH-CO-) and the carbonyl of isatin (C=O).
  • The two conjugates 12f and 12h exhibit almost completely lipophilic properties, except for the carbonyl position of isatin (C=O), which shows intermediate hydrophilic properties.
  • The three conjugates 14a, 14c, and 14d possess almost completely lipophilic surface properties, except for the carbonyl position of amide (-NH-CO-), which shows intermediate hydrophilic properties.
  • The pyrazole–indole conjugate 14b possesses lipophilic surface properties.
The lipophilic surface area of the molecule increases its lipophilicity, enhancing its ability to penetrate cell membranes. Consequently, this molecule is more effective for treatment [69]. In this section, we found that the pyrazole–indole conjugate 14b possesses completely lipophilic surface properties. Consequently, this conjugate 14b has the ability to cross cell membranes and is effective for treatment.

3.3.4. Polar Surface Area (PSA) Maps and Topological Polar Surface Area (TPSA)

The polar surface area (PSA) maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 14ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad were calculated using the Molinspiration Galaxy 3D Structure Generator v2023.08 available on the Molinspiration website: https://www.molinspiration.com/cgi/galaxy (accessed on 21 October 2024) [62]. Also, topological polar surface area (TPSA) values are related to polar surface area (PSA), which can predicted by using the Molinspiration website: https://www.molinspiration.com (accessed on 21 October 2024) [63].
Figure 7 displays the PSA maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad. While the topological polar surface area (TPSA) values of 12ah and 14ad are listed in Table 6.
The polar surface area (PSA) maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad indicate non-polar surface area and polar surface area. The two colors of the PSA maps refer to non-polar and polar areas as follows [61]:
(i) The non-polar area is represented by a gray color.
(ii) The polar area is represented by red.
From Figure 7, which displays the polar surface area (PSA) maps of the conjugates 12ah and 14ad, we observed that non-polar and polar areas are almost the same for the conjugates. The polar surface area is mainly found around heteroatoms (nitrogen and oxygen atoms) [70]. The polar surface area of the conjugates 12ah appears at the following positions: the amide (-NH-CO-), C6H5-NH- or CH3O-p-C6H4-NH-, =N-NH- of the pyrazole moiety, azomethine -N=C=, carbonyl of isatin (C=O), and N-CH3 or N-C2H5 of isatin. On the other hand, the polar surface area of the conjugates 14ad appears at the following positions: the amide (-NH-CO-), C6H5-NH-, CH3O-p-C6H4-NH-, =N-NH- of the pyrazole moiety, azomethine -N=CH-, and NH of indole.
Polar surface area (PSA) affects the molecule’s ability to permeate cells [71]. Thus, we predicted the topological polar surface area (TPSA) values through the Molinspiration website to determine this ability.
From Table 6, we observed that:
(i) The four conjugates (12a, d, e, and f) and the other four compounds (12c, d, g, and h) possess the same topological polar surface area (TPSA) values of 104.18 and 113.41 Å2, respectively.
(ii) The two conjugates, 14a and 14b, possess TPSA values of 97.69 Å2 while the other two conjugates, 14c and 14d, possess TPSA values of 107.20 Å2.
The TPSA influences intestinal absorption (IA) and penetration of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The extent of IA and BBB penetration is determined by the TPSA values of the conjugates as follows [72]:
(i) The conjugates possess good intestinal absorption if the TPSA value is <140 Å2.
(ii) The conjugates possess good penetration of the blood–brain barrier if the TPSA value is <60 Å2.
According to the TPSA value rule, we can deduce that all the conjugates possess good intestinal absorption but do not possess sufficient blood–brain barrier penetration. This is consistent with previous discoveries on pyrazole conjugates which possess good human intestine absorption characteristics [73].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we synthesized two series of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad from our previous works. Both series were screened to evaluate their biological potentials in vitro for anti-diabetic, anti-arthritic, and anti-inflammatory applications.
The assessment results show that pyrazole–indole conjugate 14b possesses powerful activities against the enzymes studied. Interestingly, pyrazole–indole 14b showed a high inhibition percentage among the two tested series against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes and possesses anti-α-glucosidase enzyme with an IC50 of 2.76 ± 0.01 µg/mL, which is close to acarbose (IC50 = 2.45 ± 0.02 µg/mL). The same derivative, 14b, possesses an inhibition percentage of 49.30 ± 0.17 against protein denaturation compared to the proficiency of diclofenac sodium (48.75 ± 0.04%). It also exhibits inhibition (% = 46.55 ± 0.17) and an IC50 value of 6.77 ± 0.01 µg/mL against the proteinase enzyme, which is more potent than diclofenac sodium (46.00 ± 0.04% and IC50 = 6.85 ± 0.022 µg/mL). Finally, anti-inflammatory results indicate that the derivative 14b possesses powerful anti-inflammatory activity against the COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes with an IC50 of 5.44 ± 0.03, 5.37 ± 0.04, and 7.52 ± 0.04, respectively, which is almost close to the IC50 of the indomethacin and zileuton drugs.
Also, computational toxicity estimations were predicted, and both series were classified as class IV (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000). The MLP map results indicate that the conjugate 14b possesses lipophilic surface properties, can consequently cross cell membranes, and is effective for treatment. Additionally, the computational TPSA results indicate that all the conjugates possess a TPSA value of more than 140 Å2 thus possess good intestinal absorption.
Finally, after the enzymatic and computational assessment results of the two series, in the future, we can make modifications to their chemical structures and conduct more in vitro, in vivo biological and computational assessments to obtain an effective drug for treating inflammation diseases and diabetes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030293/s1, the procedures, the characterized spectral data, and charts for pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad, the in vitro enzymatic assessment approaches, and statistical analysis details.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.M.A. and A.S.H.; methodology, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; software, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; validation, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; formal analysis, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; investigation, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; resources, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; data curation, W.M.A. and A.S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; writing—review and editing, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; visualization, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W., A.A.N., W.M.A. and A.S.H.; supervision, A.S.H.; project administration, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G., A.S.A.-W. and A.S.H.; funding acquisition, A.M.N., A.A.A., M.G. and A.S.A.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs; (Drug Exploration and Development Chair), Project no. (MED-P-S-02-2025-03). Also, this research was funded by Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia through Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2025R35).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article or Supplementary File.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs; (Drug Exploration and Development Chair), Project no. (MED-P-S-02-2025-03). Also, the authors are grateful to Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this work through Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2025R35).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Suneja, S.; Christian, Y.; Chandra, N.C. Milieu of Diabetes in the 2nd Decade of 21st Century. J. Diabetes Metab. 2018, 9, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dowarah, J.; Singh, V.P. Anti-diabetic drugs recent approaches and advancements. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kerru, N.; Singh-Pillay, A.; Awolade, P.; Singh, P. Current anti-diabetic agents and their molecular targets: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 152, 436–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alhawday, F.; Alminderej, F.; Ghannay, S.; Hammami, B.; Albadri, A.E.; Kadri, A.; Aouadi, K. In Silico Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Enantiopure Isoxazolidines as Promising Dual Inhibitors of α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase. Molecules 2024, 29, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, J.; Luo, J.; Tian, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, X. Progress in Understanding Oxidative Stress, Aging, and Aging-Related Diseases. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hassan, A.S.; Morsy, N.M.; Aboulthana, W.M.; Ragab, A. Exploring novel derivatives of isatin-based Schiff bases as multi-target agents: Design, synthesis, in vitro biological evaluation, and in silico ADMET analysis with molecular modeling simulations. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 9281–9303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Uhlig, T.; Moe, R.H.; Kvien, T.K. The burden of disease in rheumatoid arthritis. PharmacoEconomics 2014, 32, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Alkahtani, H.M.; Almehizia, A.A.; Al-Omar, M.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Zen, A.A.; Hassan, A.S.; Aboulthana, W.M. In Vitro Evaluation and Bioinformatics Analysis of Schiff Bases Bearing Pyrazole Scaffold as Bioactive Agents: Antioxidant, Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Alzheimer, and Anti-Arthritic. Molecules 2023, 28, 7125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qandeel, N.A.; El-Damasy, A.K.; Sharawy, M.H.; Bayomi, S.M.; El-Gohary, N.S. Synthesis, in vivo anti-inflammatory, COX-1/COX-2 and 5-LOX inhibitory activities of new 2, 3, 4-trisubstituted thiophene derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 102, 103890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pinheiro, P.d.-S.M.; Franco, L.S.; Montagnoli, T.L.; Fraga, C.A.M. Molecular hybridization: A powerful tool for multitarget drug discovery. Expert. Opin. Drug Discov. 2024, 19, 451–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, C.; Cao, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ren, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Zeng, Y.; Ling, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Hybridization-based discovery of novel quinazoline-2-indolinone derivatives as potent and selective PI3Kα inhibitors. J. Adv. Res. 2025, 68, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Abdelazeem, N.M.; Aboulthana, W.M.; Hassan, A.S.; Almehizia, A.A.; Naglah, A.M.; Alkahtani, H.M. Synthesis, in silico ADMET prediction analysis, and pharmacological evaluation of sulfonamide derivatives tethered with pyrazole or pyridine as anti-diabetic and anti-Alzheimer’s agents. Saudi Pharm. J. 2024, 32, 102025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hassan, A.S.; Hafez, T.S.; Ali, M.M.; Khatab, T.K. Design, synthesis and cytotoxic activity of some new pyrazolines bearing benzofuran and pyrazole moieties. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 417–429. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shaldam, M.A.; Almahli, H.; Angeli, A.; Badi, R.M.; Khaleel, E.F.; Zain-Alabdeen, A.I.; Elsayed, Z.M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Salem, R.; Supuran, C.T.; et al. Discovery of sulfonamide-tethered isatin derivatives as novel anticancer agents and VEGFR-2 inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2203389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ebenezer, O.; Shapi, M.; Tuszynski, J.A. A review of the recent development in the synthesis and biological evaluations of pyrazole derivatives. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Asif, M.; Almehmadi, M.; Alsaiari, A.A.; Allahyani, M. Diverse Pharmacological Potential of different Substituted Pyrazole Derivatives. Curr. Org. Synth. 2024, 21, 858–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vahora, M.S.; Boruah, J.J.; Das, S.P. Synthesis and Pharmacological Activities of Pyrazole and Oxadiazole Derivatives: A Review. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 59, 846–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mortada, S.; Karrouchi, K.; Hamza, E.H.; Oulmidi, A.; Bhat, M.A.; Mamad, H.; Aalilou, Y.; Radi, S.; Ansar, M.H.; Masrar, A.; et al. Synthesis, structural characterizations, in vitro biological evaluation and computational investigations of pyrazole derivatives as potential antidiabetic and antioxidant agents. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khadri, M.N.; Ramu, R.; Simha, N.A.; Khanum, S.A. Synthesis, molecular docking, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and ulcerogenic evaluation of thiophene-pyrazole candidates as COX, 5-LOX, and TNF-α inhibitors. Inflammopharmacology 2024, 32, 693–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kamel, M.G.; Sroor, F.M.; Hanafy, M.K.; Mahrous, K.F.; Hassaneen, H.M. Design, synthesis and potent anti-pancreatic cancer activity of new pyrazole derivatives bearing chalcone, thiazole and thiadiazole moieties: Gene expression, DNA fragmentation, cell cycle arrest and SAR. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 26954–26970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shu, V.A.; Eni, D.B.; Ntie-Kang, F. A survey of isatin hybrids and their biological properties. Mol. Divers. 2024, accepted. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rohila, Y.; Sebastian, S.; Ansari, A.; Kumar, D.; Mishra, D.K.; Gupta, M.K. A Comprehensive Review of the Diverse Spectrum Activity of 1,2,3-Triazole-linked Isatin Hybrids. Chem. Biodivers. 2024, 21, e202301612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abbasi, I.; Nadeem, H.; Saeed, A.; Kharl, H.A.A.; Tahir, M.N.; Naseer, M.M. Isatin-hydrazide conjugates as potent α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors: Synthesis, structure and in vitro evaluations. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 116, 105385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bakır, T.K.; Çavuş, M.S.; Muğlu, H.; Yakan, H. Synthesis, structure elucidation, antioxidant properties, and theoretical calculations of new Schiff bases–isatin derivatives. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2024, 50, 3937–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alkorbi, F.; Alshareef, S.A.; Abdelaziz, M.A.; Omer, N.; Jame, R.; Alatawi, I.S.; Ali, A.M.; Omran, O.A.; Bakr, R.B. Multicomponent reaction for synthesis, molecular docking, and anti-inflammatory evaluation of novel indole-thiazole hybrid derivatives. Mol. Divers. 2024, accepted. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Raza, A.R.; Rubab, S.L.; Ashfaq, M.; Altaf, Y.; Tahir, M.N.; Rehman, M.F.u.; Aziz, T.; Alharbi, M.; Alasmari, A.F. Evaluation of Antimicrobial, Anticholinesterase Potential of Indole Derivatives and Unexpectedly Synthesized Novel Benzodiazine: Characterization, DFT and Hirshfeld Charge Analysis. Molecules 2023, 28, 5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kumari, A.; Singh, R.K. Medicinal chemistry of indole derivatives: Current to future therapeutic prospectives. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 89, 103021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chang, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, S.; Yang, Z.; Feng, X.; Liu, Y. Photoredox-catalyzed diastereoselective dearomative prenylation and reverse-prenylation of electron-deficient indole derivatives. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Siddique, S.; Ahmad, K.R.; Nawaz, S.K.; Raza, A.R.; Ahmad, S.N.; Ali, R.; Inayat, I.; Suleman, S.; Kanwal, M.A.; Usman, M. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-pyretic and anti-ulcerogenic potentials of synthetic indole derivatives. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rudrapal, M.; Celik, I.; Chinnam, S.; Çevik, U.A.; Tallei, T.E.; Nizam, A.; Joy, F.; Abdellattif, M.H.; Walode, S.G. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory potential of indole derivatives. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2023, 43, 7732–7753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, C.; Liang, B.; Sun, J.; Li, J.; Xiong, Z.; Wang, S.H.; Xuetao, X. Synthesis and biological evaluation of indole derivatives containing thiazolidine-2, 4-dione as α-glucosidase inhibitors with antidiabetic activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 264, 115957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Philoppes, J.N.; Abdelgawad, M.A.; Abourehab, M.A.S.; Sebak, M.; Darwish, M.A.; Lamie, P.F. Novel N-methylsulfonyl-indole derivatives: Biological activity and COX-2/5-LOX inhibitory effect with improved gastro protective profile and reduced cardio vascular risks. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 246–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Elshemy, H.A.; Zaki, M.A.; Mohamed, E.I.; Khan, S.I.; Lamie, P.F. A multicomponent reaction to design antimalarial pyridyl-indole derivatives: Synthesis, biological activities and molecular docking. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 97, 103673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vinod, A.; Mouli, H.M.C.; Jana, A.; Peraman, R. Unlocking therapeutic potential: Exploring indole scaffolds and their structural insights as pharmacophores in designing anti-breast cancer agents. Med. Chem. Res. 2024, 33, 1100–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nehra, B.; Kumar, M.; Singh, S.; Chawla, V.; Chawla, P.A. Sojourn of Nitrogenous Heterocycles as Promising Antileishmanial Agents: Medicinal Perspectives and Structure–Activity Relationship Studies. Chem. Afr. 2024, 7, 3485–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahmad, G.; Sohail, M.; Bilal, M.; Rasool, N.; Qamar, M.U.; Ciurea, C.; Marceanu, L.G.; Misarca, C. N-Heterocycles as Promising Antiviral Agents: A Comprehensive Overview. Molecules 2024, 29, 2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kumar, A.; Rohila, Y.; Kumar, V.; Lal, K. A mini review on pharmacological significance of isatin-1, 2, 3-triazole hybrids. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2023, 23, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Islam, M.S.; Al-Majid, A.M.; Sholkamy, E.N.; Yousuf, S.; Ayaz, M.; Nawaz, A.; Wadood, A.; Rehman, A.U.; Verma, V.P.; Bari, A.; et al. Synthesis, molecular docking and enzyme inhibitory approaches of some new chalcones engrafted pyrazole as potential antialzheimer, antidiabetic and antioxidant agents. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1269, 133843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mohan, V.; Mithal, A.; Joshi, S.R.; Aravind, S.R.; Chowdhury, S. Remogliflozin etabonate in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 2487–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Paiva, R.E.F.; Vieira, E.G.; Silva, D.R.; Wegermann, C.A.; Ferreira, A.M.C. Anticancer compounds based on isatin-derivatives: Strategies to ameliorate selectivity and efficiency. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 7, 627272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dandić, A.; Rajkovača, K.; Jozanović, M.; Pukleš, I.; Széchenyi, A.; Budetić, M.; Samardžić, M. Review of characteristics and analytical methods for determination of indomethacin. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2020, 41, 34–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mukhtar, S.S.; Hassan, A.S.; Morsy, N.M.; Hafez, T.S.; Saleh, F.M.; Hassaneen, H.M. Design, synthesis, molecular prediction and biological evaluation of pyrazole-azomethine conjugates as antimicrobial agents. Synth. Commun. 2021, 51, 1564–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Almehizia, A.A.; Naglah, A.M.; Zen, A.A.; Khatab, T.K.; Hassan, A.S. TCS/ZnCl2 as a controlled reagent for the Michael addition and heterocyclic cyclization based on the phenyl pyrazolone scaffold with docking validation as a Covid-19 protease inhibitor. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2024, 38, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hassan, A.S.; Hafez, T.S. Antimicrobial Activities of Ferrocenyl Complexes: A Review. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 8, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hassan, A.S. Mixed isatin with 3-(2-(aryl)hydrazono)acetylacetone Mn(II), Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes: Antibacterial evaluation and molecular properties prediction. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2020, 34, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hassan, A.S.; Aboulthana, W.M. Synthesis, In Vitro Biological Investigation, and In Silico Analysis of Pyrazole-Based Derivatives as Multi-target Agents. Egypt. J. Chem. 2023, 66, 441–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khatab, T.K.; Hassan, A.S. Computational molecular docking and in silico ADMET prediction studies of pyrazole derivatives as COVID-19 main protease (Mpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibitors. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2023, 37, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Almehizia, A.A.; Naglah, A.M.; Aljafen, S.S.; Hassan, A.S.; Aboulthana, W.M. Assessment of the In Vitro Biological Activities of Schiff Base-Synthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles as an Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Alzheimer, and Anti-Cancer Agent. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mukhtar, S.S.; Hassan, A.S.; Morsy, N.M.; Hafez, T.S.; Hassaneen, H.M.; Saleh, F.M. Overview on synthesis, reactions, applications, and biological activities of Schiff bases. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021, 64, 6541–6554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hassan, A.S.; Askar, A.A.; Nossier, E.S.; Naglah, A.M.; Moustafa, G.O.; Al-Omar, M.A. Antibacterial evaluation, in silico characters and molecular docking of Schiff bases derived from 5-aminopyrazoles. Molecules 2019, 24, 3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hassan, A.S. Antimicrobial evaluation, in silico ADMET prediction, molecular docking, and molecular electrostatic potential of pyrazole-isatin and pyrazole-indole hybrid molecules. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2022, 19, 3577–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hassan, A.S.; Moustafa, G.O.; Awad, H.M.; Nossier, E.S.; Mady, M.F. Design, synthesis, anticancer evaluation, enzymatic assays, and a molecular modeling study of novel pyrazole–indole hybrids. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 12361–12374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pistia-Brueggeman, G.; Hollingsworth, R.I. A preparation and screening strategy for glycosidase inhibitors. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8773–8778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wickramaratne, M.N.; Punchihewa, J.; Wickramaratne, D. In-vitro alpha amylase inhibitory activity of the leaf extracts of Adenanthera pavonina. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Oyedapo, O.O.; Famurewa, A.J. Antiprotease and Membrane Stabilizing Activities of Extracts of Fagara Zanthoxyloides, Olax Subscorpioides and Tetrapleura Tetraptera. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 1995, 33, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Das, S.; Sureshkumar, P. Effect of methanolic root extract of Blepharispermum subsesssile DC in controlling arthritic activity. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 11, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
  57. Alaa, A.M.; El-Azab, A.S.; Abou-Zeid, L.A.; ElTahir, K.E.; Abdel-Aziz, N.I.; Ayyad, R.R.; Al-Obaid, A.M. Synthesis, anti-inflammatory, analgesic and COX-1/2 inhibition activities of anilides based on 5, 5-diphenylimidazolidine-2, 4-dione scaffold: Molecular docking studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 115, 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  58. Huang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, W. Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and docking study of novel indole-2-amide as anti-inflammatory agents with dual inhibition of COX and 5-LOX. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 180, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rajaselvi, N.D.; Jida, M.D.; Nair, D.B.; Sujith, S.; Beegum, N.; Nisha, A.R. Toxicity prediction and analysis of flavonoid apigenin as a histone deacetylase inhibitor: An in-silico approach. Silico Pharmacol. 2023, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Elsherif, M.A.; Hassan, A.S.; Moustafa, G.O.; Awad, H.M.; Morsy, N.M. Antimicrobial evaluation and molecular properties prediction of pyrazolines incorporating benzofuran and pyrazole moieties. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Serin, S. Quantum Chemical-Based Investigations and Lipophilicity Evaluations on Some Structurally Related Quinazoline Derivatives. Orbital Electron. J. Chem. 2024, 16, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Naveed, M.; Ain, N.U.; Aziz, T.; Saleem, A.; Shabbir, M.A.; Khan, A.A.; Albekairi, T.H. Integrated track of nano-informatics coupling with the enrichment concept in developing a novel nanoparticle targeting ERK protein in Naegleria fowleri. Open Chem. 2024, 22, 20230198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iduoku, K.; Ngongang, M.; Kulathunga, J.; Daghighi, A.; Casanola-Martin, G.; Simsek, S.; Rasulev, B. Phenolic Acid–β-Cyclodextrin Complexation Study to Mask Bitterness in Wheat Bran: A Machine Learning-Based QSAR Study. Foods 2024, 13, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nkoana, J.K.; Mphahlele, M.J.; More, G.K.; Choong, Y.S. Exploring the 3,5-Dibromo-4,6-dimethoxychalcones and Their Flavone Derivatives as Dual α-Glucosidase and α-Amylase Inhibitors with Antioxidant and Anticancer Potential. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sharma, A.; Dubey, R.; Bhupal, R.; Patel, P.; Verma, S.K.; Kaya, S.; Asati, V. An insight on medicinal attributes of 1,2,3-and 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Mol. Divers. 2023, 28, 3605–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Khadri, M.N.; Khamees, H.A.; Kouser, S.; Khanum, S.A. Synthesis, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, ulcerogenic evaluation, and docking study of (benzoylphenoxy)-N-{5-[2-methylphenyl-6-chlorobenzoxazole]} acetamides as COX/5-LOX inhibitor. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1272, 134240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hassan, A.S.; Morsy, N.M.; Awad, H.M.; Ragab, A. Synthesis, molecular docking, and in silico ADME prediction of some fused pyrazolo [1, 5-a] pyrimidine and pyrazole derivatives as potential antimicrobial agents. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2022, 19, 521–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alam, M.S.; Lee, D.U.; Bari, M.L. Antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of Schiff base analogues of 4-aminoantipyrine. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2014, 57, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Matyszewska, D.; Zaborowska, M.; Fontaine, P. Is lipophilicity the main factor determining the effective drug penetration through lipid membranes? Combined GIXD and PM-IRRAS studies on the example of anthracyclines. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 385, 122324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schaftenaar, G.; de Vlieg, J. Quantum mechanical polar surface area. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 26, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sakamoto, K.; Hirokawa, T. Lipid bilayer membrane permeability mechanism of the K-Ras (G12D)-inhibitory bicyclic peptide KS-58 elucidated by molecular dynamics simulations. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2024, 100, 129649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ibrahim, Z.Y.; Uzairu, A.; Shallangwa, G.A.; Abechi, S.E. Pharmacokinetic predictions and docking studies of substituted aryl amine-based triazolopyrimidine designed inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (PfDHODH). Futur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Roney, M.; Singh, G.; Huq, A.K.M.M.; Forid, M.S.; Ishak, W.M.B.W.; Rullah, K.; Aluwi, M.F.F.M.; Tajuddin, S.N. Identification of pyrazole derivatives of usnic acid as novel inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease through virtual screening approaches. Mol. Biotechnol. 2024, 66, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Examples of bioactive pyrazole 13, isatin 46, and indole 79 compounds.
Figure 1. Examples of bioactive pyrazole 13, isatin 46, and indole 79 compounds.
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g001
Figure 2. Example of pyrazole-based drug (A), isatine-based drug (B), and indole-based drug (C).
Figure 2. Example of pyrazole-based drug (A), isatine-based drug (B), and indole-based drug (C).
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g002
Scheme 1. Synthesis of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 sch001
Figure 3. (A) The inhibition percentage (%) and (B) the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the anti-diabetic activities of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-diabetic agent (acarbose).
Figure 3. (A) The inhibition percentage (%) and (B) the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the anti-diabetic activities of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-diabetic agent (acarbose).
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g003
Figure 4. (A) The inhibition percentage (%) and (B) the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of anti-inflammatory assessments of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-inflammatory agents.
Figure 4. (A) The inhibition percentage (%) and (B) the median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of anti-inflammatory assessments of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-inflammatory agents.
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g004
Figure 5. Displays the plotting of the drug-likeness model scores for 12e and 12g.
Figure 5. Displays the plotting of the drug-likeness model scores for 12e and 12g.
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g005
Figure 6. The MLP maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad.
Figure 6. The MLP maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad.
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g006
Figure 7. The PSA maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad.
Figure 7. The PSA maps of pyrazole–isatin conjugates 12ah and pyrazole–indole conjugates 14ad.
Pharmaceutics 17 00293 g007
Table 1. The inhibition percentage (%) and IC50 values of in vitro anti-diabetic activity of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and acarbose against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes.
Table 1. The inhibition percentage (%) and IC50 values of in vitro anti-diabetic activity of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and acarbose against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes.
Pyrazole Conjugatesα-Amylaseα-Glucosidase
Inhibition (%)IC50 (µg/mL)Inhibition (%)IC50 (µg/mL)
12a19.19 ± 0.0314.42 ± 0.168.94 ± 0.0317.10 ± 0.14
12b20.33 ± 0.0313.61 ± 0.1510.08 ± 0.0315.16 ± 0.12
12c22.31 ± 0.0312.40 ± 0.1312.06 ± 0.0312.68 ± 0.10
12d22.16 ± 0.0312.49 ± 0.1411.91 ± 0.0312.84 ± 0.10
12e19.33 ± 0.0314.32 ± 0.169.08 ± 0.0316.85 ± 0.14
12f20.48 ± 0.0313.52 ± 0.1510.23 ± 0.0314.95 ± 0.12
12g22.47 ± 0.0312.32 ± 0.1312.22 ± 0.0312.52 ± 0.10
12h21.94 ± 0.0312.62 ± 0.1411.69 ± 0.0313.08 ± 0.10
14a50.59 ± 0.235.47 ± 0.0340.34 ± 0.233.79 ± 0.01
14b65.74 ± 0.234.21 ± 0.0355.49 ± 0.232.76 ± 0.01
14c34.84 ± 0.237.94 ± 0.0324.59 ± 0.236.22 ± 0.01
14d35.34 ± 0.237.83 ± 0.0425.09 ± 0.236.09 ± 0.01
Acarbose72.58 ± 0.163.81 ± 0.0462.33 ± 0.162.45 ± 0.02
Values were calculated from three replicates and expressed as the mean ± SE.
Table 2. The inhibition percentage (%) and IC50 values of in vitro anti-arthritic activity of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and diclofenac sodium against protein denaturation and proteinase enzymes.
Table 2. The inhibition percentage (%) and IC50 values of in vitro anti-arthritic activity of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and diclofenac sodium against protein denaturation and proteinase enzymes.
Pyrazole ConjugatesProtein DenaturationProteinase
Inhibition (%)Inhibition (%)IC50 (µg/mL)
12a14.40 ± 0.0311.65 ± 0.0323.20 ± 0.04
12b15.25 ± 0.0312.50 ± 0.0321.90 ± 0.04
12c16.73 ± 0.0313.98 ± 0.0319.96 ± 0.04
12d16.62 ± 0.0313.87± 0.0320.10 ± 0.04
12e14.50 ± 0.0311.75 ± 0.0323.04 ± 0.04
12f15.36 ± 0.0312.61 ± 0.0321.75 ± 0.04
12g16.85 ± 0.0314.10 ± 0.0319.82 ± 0.04
12h16.45 ± 0.0313.70 ± 0.0320.30 ± 0.04
14a37.94 ± 0.1735.19 ± 0.178.80 ± 0.02
14b49.30 ± 0.1746.55 ± 0.176.77 ± 0.01
14c26.13 ± 0.1723.38 ± 0.1712.78 ± 0.06
14d26.50 ± 0.1723.75 ± 0.1712.60 ± 0.06
Diclofenac Sodium48.75 ± 0.0446.00 ± 0.046.85 ± 0.02
The results were calculated from three replicates and presented as the mean ± standard error (SE).
Table 3. The inhibition percentage (%) and IC50 values of in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-inflammatory agents (indomethacin and zileuton) against COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes.
Table 3. The inhibition percentage (%) and IC50 values of in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of pyrazole–isatin 12ah, pyrazole–indole 14ad, and standard anti-inflammatory agents (indomethacin and zileuton) against COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LOX enzymes.
Pyrazole ConjugatesCOX-1COX-25-LOX
Inhibition (%)IC50 (µg/mL)Inhibition (%)IC50 (µg/mL)Inhibition (%)IC50 (µg/mL)
12a17.47 ± 0.0421.74 ± 0.0819.72 ± 0.0419.64 ± 0.109.57 ± 0.0421.79 ± 0.10
12b18.75 ± 0.0420.25 ± 0.0721.00 ± 0.0418.44 ± 0.0910.85 ± 0.0420.59 ± 0.09
12c20.98 ± 0.0418.10 ± 0.0623.23 ± 0.0416.68 ± 0.0813.08 ± 0.0418.83 ± 0.08
12d20.80 ± 0.0418.26 ± 0.0623.05 ± 0.0416.80 ± 0.0812.90 ± 0.0418.95 ± 0.08
12e17.62 ± 0.0421.55 ± 0.0819.87 ± 0.0419.49 ± 0.099.72 ± 0.0421.64 ± 0.09
12f18.91 ± 0.0420.08 ± 0.0721.16 ± 0.0418.30 ± 0.0911.01 ± 0.0420.45 ± 0.09
12g21.15 ± 0.0417.95 ± 0.0623.40 ± 0.0416.55 ± 0.0813.25 ± 0.0418.70 ± 0.08
12h20.56 ± 0.0418.47 ± 0.0622.81 ± 0.0416.98 ± 0.0812.66 ± 0.0419.13 ± 0.08
14a52.79 ± 0.267.19 ± 0.0455.04 ± 0.267.04 ± 0.0644.89 ± 0.269.19 ± 0.06
14b69.83 ± 0.265.44 ± 0.0372.08 ± 0.265.37 ± 0.0461.93 ± 0.267.52 ± 0.04
14c35.07 ± 0.2610.83 ± 0.0937.32 ± 0.2610.38 ± 0.1127.17 ± 0.2612.53 ± 0.11
14d35.63 ± 0.2610.66 ± 0.0937.88 ± 0.2610.23 ± 0.1127.73 ± 0.2612.38 ± 0.11
STDIndomethacinZileuton
80.51 ± 0.075.50 ± 0.0182.76 ± 0.074.68 ± 0.0272.61 ± 0.076.83 ± 0.02
The results were calculated from three replicates and presented as the mean ± standard error (SE).
Table 4. Significant correlations among measurements of the in vitro biological assessments of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Table 4. Significant correlations among measurements of the in vitro biological assessments of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Inhibition Percentage (%)
Anti-DiabeticAnti-ArthriticAnti-Inflammatory
α-Amylaseα-GlucosidaseProtein DenaturationProteinaseCOX-1COX-25-LOX
Anti-diabetic assessmentInhibition Percentage (%)α-amylase-0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
α-Glucosidase0.000-0.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Anti-arthritic assessmentProtein Denaturation0.0000.000-0.0000.0000.0000.000
Proteinase0.0000.0000.000-0.0000.0000.000
Anti-inflammatory assessmentCOX-10.0000.0000.0000.000-0.0000.000
COX-20.0000.0000.0000.0000.000-0.000
5-LOX0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000-
A significant correlation at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. The toxic doses, toxicity classes, and the drug-likeness model scores (DLMS) of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Table 5. The toxic doses, toxicity classes, and the drug-likeness model scores (DLMS) of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Pyrazole ConjugatesToxic Dose (LD50, mg kg−1) Toxicity ClassDrug-Likeness Model Scores (DLMS)
12a100040.70
12b100040.70
12c100040.71
12d100040.65
12e100040.85
12f100040.82
12g100040.83
12h100040.76
14a10004−0.50
14b10004−0.43
14c10004−0.37
14d10004−0.44
Table 6. Topological polar surface area (TPSA) values of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Table 6. Topological polar surface area (TPSA) values of pyrazole–isatin 12ah and pyrazole–indole 14ad.
Pyrazole ConjugatesTopological Polar Surface Area (TPSA)
12a104.18
12b104.18
12c113.41
12d113.41
12e104.18
12f104.18
12g113.41
12h113.41
14a97.96
14b97.96
14c107.20
14d107.20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naglah, A.M.; Almehizia, A.A.; Ghazwani, M.; Al-Wasidi, A.S.; Naglah, A.A.; Aboulthana, W.M.; Hassan, A.S. In Vitro Enzymatic and Computational Assessments of Pyrazole–Isatin and Pyrazole–Indole Conjugates as Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Arthritic, and Anti-Inflammatory Agents. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030293

AMA Style

Naglah AM, Almehizia AA, Ghazwani M, Al-Wasidi AS, Naglah AA, Aboulthana WM, Hassan AS. In Vitro Enzymatic and Computational Assessments of Pyrazole–Isatin and Pyrazole–Indole Conjugates as Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Arthritic, and Anti-Inflammatory Agents. Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(3):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naglah, Ahmed M., Abdulrahman A. Almehizia, Mohammed Ghazwani, Asma S. Al-Wasidi, Abdelrahman A. Naglah, Wael M. Aboulthana, and Ashraf S. Hassan. 2025. "In Vitro Enzymatic and Computational Assessments of Pyrazole–Isatin and Pyrazole–Indole Conjugates as Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Arthritic, and Anti-Inflammatory Agents" Pharmaceutics 17, no. 3: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030293

APA Style

Naglah, A. M., Almehizia, A. A., Ghazwani, M., Al-Wasidi, A. S., Naglah, A. A., Aboulthana, W. M., & Hassan, A. S. (2025). In Vitro Enzymatic and Computational Assessments of Pyrazole–Isatin and Pyrazole–Indole Conjugates as Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Arthritic, and Anti-Inflammatory Agents. Pharmaceutics, 17(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop