Abstract
Skin is the largest organ and a multifunctional interface between the body and its environment. It acts as a barrier against cold, heat, injuries, infections, chemicals, radiations or other exogeneous factors, and it is also known as the mirror of the soul. The skin is involved in body temperature regulation by the storage of fat and water. It is an interesting tissue in regard to the local and transdermal application of active ingredients for prevention or treatment of pathological conditions. Topical and transdermal delivery is an emerging route of drug and cosmetic administration. It is beneficial for avoiding side effects and rapid metabolism. Many pharmaceutical, technological and cosmetic innovations have been described and patented recently in the field. In this review, the main features of skin morphology and physiology are presented and are being followed by the description of classical and novel nanoparticulate dermal and transdermal drug formulations. The biophysical aspects of the penetration of drugs and cosmetics into or across the dermal barrier and their investigation in diffusion chambers, skin-on-a-chip devices, high-throughput measuring systems or with advanced analytical techniques are also shown. The current knowledge about mathematical modeling of skin penetration and the future perspectives are briefly discussed in the end, all also involving nanoparticulated systems.
1. Introduction
Currently, in addition to traditional and parenteral oral dosage forms, alternative drug administration methods, including topical (or also called dermal) and transdermal delivery systems of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), are becoming more and more important. While topical/dermal formulations are aimed to achieve local effects on the skin surface/superficial layers (e.g., epidermis—topical delivery) and in the underlying tissues (e.g., dermis—dermal delivery; muscle or joint), transdermal formulations are designed to reach systemic circulation by penetrating the skin layers to achieve systemic effects [1]. Therefore, the skin/transdermal pathway is not only important for dermatological therapy, as other organs (e.g., joints, central nervous system, hormone therapy, or pain relief, etc.) can also be the therapeutic targets. In addition, most of the preparations developed for the purposes of cosmetology are also applied to the skin or skin appendages (hair, nails). However, due to the specific functionalities of its morphology, human skin poses an efficient mechanical barrier against the ingress of substances that come into contact with the skin surface. Many active ingredients are difficult to absorb via the skin barrier [2], so they can only be effectively delivered through the skin in appropriate formulations and with penetration-enhancing techniques.
Navigating through the landscape of recent scientific papers, patent applications and clinical trials, it is evident that progress has been extensively made in the development and application of various modern, innovative, topical and transdermal delivery systems and methods for enhancing skin penetration and permeation. The present review deals with the different aspects of drug and cosmetic penetration into and/or across the skin barrier, involving versatile techniques used for characterization of skin penetration as well as mathematical modeling for penetration prediction. An overview of conventional topical drug delivery systems and, particularly, of advanced, nanoparticle-based carriers for topical and transdermal drug delivery is also presented through an extensive survey of recently reported research studies, clinical trials and patent applications in the field.
2. Drug Delivery through the skin
2.1. Structure of the Skin and Its Barrier Function
How is the skin barrier structured? This knowledge is of high importance in regard to finding strategies to overcome the barrier for therapeutic reasons and to investigate the penetration behavior of APIs. The skin features a layer-based structure which is constantly renewing itself. Figure 1 presents a scheme of the skin cross section, which is differentiated into its main structures of the epidermis and dermis.
Figure 1.
Main cellular elements of the human skin.
The largest structure of human skin is the dermis, in which hair follicles and their erecting muscles, perspiratory and sebaceous glands, nerves, small blood and lymph vessels are located. For the skin immune function, physiologically important macrophages, mast cells and dermal dendritic cells are also found in this layer. Its strength, as well as its flexibility, is induced by fibroblasts and structure proteins like collagen and elastin bundles [3]. The epidermis can be divided into a viable and a non-viable section. The viable section beneath the squamous epidermis cells is composed of basal cells and melanocytes. Furthermore, the outermost layer of the non-viable section is the so-called stratum corneum (SC), a very thin but highly defined heterogenous microstructure with cornified cells (corneocytes) which are surrounded by a complex lamellar lipid matrix—comparable to a wall—where bricks are embedded in mortar. This is what the brick mortar model was named after [4]. The corneocytes themselves are surrounded by covalently bound lipid lamellae, which form the cornified lipid envelope (CLE). Thus, the corneocytes are connected to each other by so-called corneodesmosomes, meaning cell–cell contacts, where up to 500 are described per corneocyte. All SC components and their interplay have been the focus of international research groups in recent decades, and this interest is still ongoing. A central point of interest has been the exact qualitative and quantitative composition of the SC lipid matrix, where ceramides, cholesterol, cholesterol sulphate, and free fatty acids were defined as main components [5]. They were used to investigate skin lipid models to understand their impact on the SC barrier function [6]. This is of high relevance, as either pathogenic event occurs as a change in the lipid composition followed by a disturbed skin barrier [7]. Interruptions or defects within the SC lipid matrix and changes in lipid conformation render the SC more permeable for both lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds [8]. Dehydration of the SC, which, in a diseased state, is often related to decreased content of the natural moisturizing factor, causes increased scaling and weakened barrier function [9], while increased water content causes swelling and facilitates ingress, especially of polar permeants [10]. Therefore, the composition, structure and organization of SC lipids play essential roles in maintaining normal skin hydration and physiological function [11].
Furthermore, the SC barrier function is strongly dependent on intact physiological conditions. In practice, this also involves an intact hydrolipidic film at the skin surface with a balanced skin microbiome [12]. Maintaining acidic physiological pH to ensure adequate enzymatic activity of both endogenous and microbial enzymes ensures formation of the SC compounds to maintain homeostasis.
2.2. Penetration Pathways through the Stratum Corneum (SC)
In regard to transdermal drug penetration, beside the SC, which makes the primary barrier, the viable epidermis is also considered rate-limiting to a certain extent, while the underlying dermis is considered a significant limitation mostly for highly lipophilic permeants [13]. The available penetration pathways are described as axillary via the SC and alongside the hair follicle shafts and sweat ducts, where the latter can also contribute significantly to overall absorption and permeation through the skin [14]. However, as these skin appendages comprise a limited area, they are assumed to play their significant role only under specific circumstances [15]. The most significant contribution to steady state drug flux across the skin is assumed to be achieved through intercellular transport, i.e., penetration along the SC lipid matrix [8]. Since the SC lipid matrix offers a continuous phase for drug transport and—due to its internal structure—sufficient solubility for moderately hydrophilic to lipophilic drugs, it is generally recognized that most uncharged molecules with a small molecular mass (<500 Da) will penetrate along this pathway [13]. In addition, drug penetration through the transcellular pathway directly across corneocytes and intercellular lipid space is possible. However, due to the permanent change in hydrophilic/lipophilic regions, this pathway plays a subordinate role regarding its relative contribution to steady state flux. But, solute diffusion across the SC barrier can take place via the trans-corneocyte (corneodesmosomal) pathway alongside the surface of the corneocytes as well, crossing the lipid matrix via corneodesmosomes [16].
2.3. Skin Models with Different Complexity
Evaluation and optimization of topical and transdermal formulations is another significant challenge. Today, researchers are increasingly moving from preclinical animal models to in vitro early phase studies and human testing. Testing cosmetics on experimental animals is prohibited; however, drugs can still be assessed on in vivo animal models. Animal experiments are of great importance in modeling various dermatological diseases, discovering their pathomechanisms, developing different therapeutic strategies, and identifying targets. Moreover, devices with a miniaturized size, better simulating physiological conditions [17], and higher dynamicexamination reveal the absorption of drugs and active substances ex vivo through skin tissue samples or skin cell cultures. There are many types of these systems that can be used to model both healthy and diseased states. Significant progress has been made recently in the development of various skin substitutes. Thus, in addition to two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) in vitro cell culture assays [18], many researchers are also working on the production of 3D bioprinted artificial tissues [19]. The combination of one-, two- and three-component tissues (keratinocytes, fibroblasts and melanocytes) with vascular and immune elements (endothelial cells, macrophages, etc.) represents the most relevant approach at the moment. Further efforts have been made to integrate skin appendages into artificial skins. If these studies do not produce extensive results, model calculations are a significant contribution in estimating the skin absorption of drugs, as they can predict with a very good approximation the absorption of active substances under different conditions.
The following review provides a comprehensive overview of the available methods, techniques and their various advantages and disadvantages with regard to local and transdermal drug diffusion approaches.
3. Skin Penetration
3.1. Biophysical Aspects of the Skin Penetration and Permeation
Skin permeation of drugs through the SC depends on the physicochemical properties of the applied substance, vehicle properties, and skin condition [10]. In dermal drug delivery, drug penetration into and distribution within the epidermis and dermis is the main target. Drug penetration into surrounding adipose and muscle tissue may be observed depending on drug properties. Successful design of a transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) involves further uptake into the vascular system and distribution within the systemic blood circulation. Considering the steady-state flux, as defined by Barry [20], the most important factors governing drug permeation can be reduced to:
The drug mass flux in steady-state conditions is determined by the diffusion coefficient of the drug, the constant donor drug concentration and the partition coefficient between the membrane and acceptor solution. The higher these factors are, the higher the mass flux will be. An inverse correlation is found for the membrane thickness , where larger values will cause lower mass flux per unit of time and area. Consequently, desired properties to optimize drug flux across the SC are as follows [13,20]: (I) low molecular mass, ideally below 500 Da, and high ; (II) moderate lipophilicity to achieve adequate solubility in both oil and water, thus achieving high thermodynamic activity through a high membrane concentration gradient (III); balanced K to achieve good partitioning into the membrane, but also clearance towards the viable tissue: hence, intermediate partition coefficients (log K octanol/water of 1–3) are to be preferred; (IV) a low melting point, ensuring solubility at room temperature.
If these properties are not sufficiently met to ensure an adequate drug flux across the SC, different enhancement strategies can be followed to meet the therapeutic goal. For transdermal delivery, the free base or acid form of small lipophilic drugs is usually preferred over their salt forms [21]. For the increasing number of modern biotech drugs, such as peptides, proteins and bionucleotides, the following additional challenges must be faced: large molecular weight, their polar nature and/or charged or even zwitterionic groups that hinder successful delivery across the SC by passive diffusion and render enhancement strategies a necessity [21].
3.2. Enhancement of Skin Penetration/Permeation: Chemical and Physical Strategies
To achieve adequate dermal or transdermal drug concentrations for therapeutic success, many active pharmaceutical ingredients require the use of enhancement strategies that temporarily lower SC barrier function. Two main options exist: the use of chemical permeation enhancers, i.e., passive methods that affect SC barrier function through application of specific chemical agents or vehicles, and the use of physical enhancement methods, i.e., active methods that involve an energy input, such as sonophoresis, iontophoresis and magnetophoresis, or disruption of the SC barrier through microneedling, microdermabrasion or tape stripping.
Chemical enhancers have been extensively investigated in past decades [22]. Water may increase drug penetration through swelling of the SC, which corresponds to the effect achieved by occlusion through lipophilic ointments or patches. Most chemical enhancers lower the barrier function of the SC lipid matrix through lipid extraction, intercalation or fluidization [23]. The mechanism of action of chemical enhancers is entirely dependent on their structural properties; effects have been described for dimethyl sulphoxide, azone, alcohols such as ethanol and propylene glycol, surfactants including phospholipids and fatty acids, such as oleic acid [24] and terpenes [25]. Cell-penetrating peptides are among the most recent approaches [26]. Vehicle strategies to promote drug penetration into the skin involve adaptation of the vehicle to increase mass flux across the SC, e.g., by supersaturation, formation of solvent-rich microemulsions or use of ionic liquids. Various nanocarrier systems have been developed to achieve the enhanced skin penetration of actives, e.g., liposomes, lipid nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes or dendrimers. Apart from vehicle effects, drug modification is possible to improve penetration, e.g., by use of prodrugs [27].
Physical penetration enhancement can be achieved by mechanically disrupting the SC barrier. Currently proposed strategies include treatment with microneedles or dermarollers [28,29], elongated microparticles [29] and, more recently, STAR particles [30]. Reported disadvantages of such techniques include variability in penetration depth and lack of efficacy in some cases [29].
3.3. Penetration of Cosmetics vs. Therapeutic Formulations
As both therapeutic and cosmetic formulations have comparable excipients and formulae, they are available in the form of oil, ointment, emulsion, gel, lotion, aqueous solution, paste or even powder. The fact that cosmetic and pharmaceutically active formulations differ in terms of the effects they impart is primarily due to the different regulations to which both types of preparations are subject. Cosmetics, including their manufacturing, permitted and prohibited ingredients and labeling requirements, are regulated at the European level by Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 [31], which states that cosmetics may only care, cleanse, perfume or maintain a good condition. Pharmaceutically active preparations are subject to the European Directive 2001/83/EC [32], which, when transposed into national law, states that these preparations must have a pharmacological, metabolic or immunological effect on the human body in order to be a medicinal product. It is therefore clear from the mediating effects and interactions of the preparations with the human body to what extent cosmetics and medicinal products differ. Nevertheless, there are always borderline cases that run not least along the pharmacologically active concentration of an ingredient or are even to be defined as a substance-based medical device according to Regulation (EU) No. 2017/745 [33], which primarily conveys a medical purpose due to physical effects, e.g., pH regulation, isotonicity, cooling or UV protection. Numerous cosmetic formulations aim to cleanse the skin as rinse-off products or to perfume the skin as leave-on products. Cosmetics, furthermore, are primarily used for skin care, in particular for hydrating the skin or supplying skin-like substances such as ceramide subspecies, hyaluronic acid or vitamins in order to maintain or restore a good condition. However, following Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 [31], cosmetics are only allowed to penetrate into the skin, whereby permeation and thus systemic bioavailability should always be excluded to avoid negative side effects.
Pharmaceutical-active formulations, on the other hand, are built around the active ingredient and aim to maximize its bioavailability. Depending on the target compartment, the penetration depths of the active ingredients also differ, as follows: azoles as antimycotics act locally on or in the SC; glucocorticoids or calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of, e.g., atopic dermatitis act primarily in the dermis; transdermal topical preparations, such as hormone gels, should reach the systemic circulation with correspondingly high and constant bioavailability.
4. Liquid and Semisolid Topical/Transdermal Formulations
4.1. Classical Topical Formulations
Despite extensive research on innovative formulations for dermal and transdermal use, most marketed formulations still fall within one of the classical topical formulation types. Therefore, the systematics of classical topical formulations will be described briefly in the following paragraphs. Classical topical formulations can be divided by (a) their viscosity into liquid or semisolid formulations; (b) by the number of phases, which may be one or two; and (c) by the site of action of the comprised drug, which may be the skin itself (dermal) or any part of the body after systemic absorption (transdermal). Table 1 gives an overview of the classification by the European Pharmacopoeia 11th edition (Ph. Eur. 11.0) [34]. Emulsions and creams contain a minimum of two phases, i.e., oil and water, wherein one phase is distributed within the other. Thereby, water-in-oil (W/O) or oil-in-water (O/W) formulations may be formed. Emulsifiers are added to enable emulsification and ensure physical stability of the emulsion during storage. They are classified by their hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value. If the lipophilic part of the molecule dominates, values below 10 are achieved which relate to W/O-emulsifiers. Accordingly, values above 10 are obtained if the hydrophilic part dominates and describe O/W-emulsifiers. The oil component may be used to dissolve the API, to improve the skin feel, to improve the skin care properties or to deliver penetration enhancers (e.g., isopropyl myristate, oleic acid or essential oils).
Table 1.
Overview of liquid and semisolid topical formulations classified by the Ph. Eur. 11.0 [34].
Semisolid dosage forms for cutaneous use exhibit a yield point, which means that a certain (shear) force is required to make them flow. This behavior enables easy dosing and spreadability while ensuring that the formulation stays in place once applied to the skin.
Gels contain gelling agents that immobilize the liquid. In principle, three mechanisms of gel formation are described. Polymeric gel formers, such as cellulose ethers, may interact with each other by secondary valences (Van der Waals forces or hydrogen-bonding); surfactants form micelles, which, in cases of a suitably high concentration, lead to an increased viscosity and development of a yield point, and particles may form networks due to inter-particulate interactions and thereby immobilize the fluids between them. In hydrogels, electrostatic repulsion of, for example, deprotonated acids may also lead to entrapment of the liquid phase and gel formation. Here, the negatively charged -COO− groups present within the polymer chains repulse each other, leading to swelling and subsequent entrapment of water. Hydrogels have a cooling effect and “light” skin feel, whereas oleogels are partially occlusive and may be perceived as greasy.
Hydrophilic ointments are scarce; most ointments are hydrophobic or water absorbing. In the latter case, the comprised emulsifier(s) and its/their HLB-value(s) determine the type of cream formed [34]. Some of the substances comprising the term emulsifier may rather be termed as constancy agents, like glycerol monostearate or cetylstearyl alcohol. Although a (very low) HLB value can be calculated, the substances are not good emulsifiers as they crystallize at room temperature. The benefit of their incorporation into ointments and creams rather is the formation of a liquid crystalline network inside the formulation which contributes to the formation of a yield point and thus to the semisolid nature of the formulation.
Classical creams are formed out of water-absorbing ointments by adding water. The HLB value of the emulsifier present in the water-absorbing ointment defines the type of cream that is obtained. In the classical picture of creams, they comprise two phases, water and oil. Today, creams are understood as tri-phasic systems as the emulsifiers form a separate, liquid crystalline phase together with constancy agents. The formed network provides the creams with their semisolid behavior [35].
Addition of larger amounts of finely dispersed solids, such as ZnO to creams or ointments leads to the formation of pastes.
Apart from these classical creams, more sophisticated formulations are developed that do not entirely fit the categories of the pharmacopoeia. Some recently approved products, researched from the EMA’s and FDA’s database, will be highlighted here. An example is Wynzora® cream, which makes use of the PAD™ technology (PolyAphron Dispersion), where the oil droplets are stabilized due to encapsulation in a multimolecular structure formed by the emulsifiers [36], thereby providing such high stability to the individual droplets that the emulsifier content can be drastically reduced. This does not only make the formulation less irritative but also provides higher chemical stability to drugs that are prone to hydrolysis. Another example is Twyneo®, cream for treatment of acne, marketed in the US. It combines tretinoin and benzoyl peroxide in one formulation, although tretinoin is prone to oxidation and benzoyl peroxide is a strong oxidizing agent. To achieve this, the marketing authorization holder claims both drugs are encapsulated separately inside the cream so that tretinoin is chemically stable despite the presence of benzoyl peroxide [37]. Butylated hydroxytoluene as an antioxidant and citric acid as a pH adjustment agent surely help in keeping tretinoin stable.
As one can deduce from the last examples, and which will become even more obvious in the following chapters, new formulation categories are urgently needed to fit the innovative techniques that are currently being developed.
4.2. Film Forming Formulations
Film forming formulations were pioneered by Lunter in 2012 [38,39]. The formulations combine the advantages of semisolid formulations with those of patches. Like semisolid formulations, they are easy to spread on the skin and may be applied to skin areas of any size. After application, they form a flexible film on the skin which, like patches, contains a reservoir of the drug and releases it continuously; therefore, high substantivity and a sustained release can be achieved [40]. Film-forming formulations may be solutions or emulsions that contain film-forming polymers either in solution or dispersion, and mesoporous carriers may also be used to incorporate the drug [38,39,40]. Organic solvents like ethanol or isopropanol, as well as hydro-alcoholic solutions, are used to dissolve drugs and polymers [41].
Special aspects to be considered in the design of film forming formulations include the solubility of the drug in the solvent and/or polymer, the skin irritancy of the formulation as a whole, flexibility of the formed film, impact of the excipients on skin barrier function and environmental aspects, to name a few. For example, organic solvents evaporate quickly upon application to the skin and leave a film comprising the drug in amorphous dispersions. These are unstable, and precipitation of the drug into small particles may occur, which would then alter the release kinetics [35]. To circumvent negative impacts of organic solvents on the skin barrier, aqueous dispersions of non-water-soluble polymers may be used as an alternative to organic solutions. Sustained release polymers like Eudragit RS, NE may be used as film formers that guarantee sustained release of the incorporated drug, but they are not biodegradable and will enter the environment through wastewater [39,42]. Thus, natural polymers like levan have also been investigated, just like semi-synthetic polymers, e.g., cellulose ethers [43,44]. Both film forming solutions and emulsions may contain plasticisers to make the film more flexible and enable them to follow the normal movements of the human skin [38,39,43]. Emulsions may be used to dissolve non-water-soluble drugs in the oil phase and prevent precipitation after film formation. The oil phase may also serve as an emollient, which may be beneficial for therapy [44]. The patch-no-patch system follows a different approach to the previously described film forming formulations. The drug, plasticiser, optional penetration enhancer and polymer are dissolved in water, cast to a defined thickness and dried to give a thin film. Before application to the skin, the films are wetted by a small amount of water, which makes the polymer swell and become adhesive. This enables the patches to be applied to the skin without the necessity of adding additional adhesives [45].
Kapoor et al. developed film forming formulations comprising tazarotene as an active ingredient and polyamide-3 polymers as film formers [35]. Upon application to the skin, films were formed in which the active ingredient was molecularly dispersed, as shown by a decrease in the polymer-glass transition temperature. Release and penetration of the active substance from the films was ten-fold increased compared to a marketed conventional formulation [35]. This shows that the concept of using amorphous solid dispersions to enhance bioavailability may also be applied in topical dosage forms.
Han et al. developed film forming formulations containing acyclovir [46]. Using chitosan and polyvinyl pyrrolidone as film formers, combined with PEG 600 as a plasticiser and lactic acid as a humectant, they were able to form hydro-alcoholic gels which rapidly form films on the skin and inhibit excessive crystallization of the drug therein. They also found that high amounts of PEG 600 enhanced acyclovir penetration into the skin, which resulted in significantly increased delivery of acyclovir compared to a marketed conventional formulation [46].
Chamsai et al. developed chlorhexidine gluconate containing film forming formulations for the antiseptic treatment of wounds [47]. After evaluation of different polymers (Eudragit S, Eudragit L and polyvinyl alcohol), they found that the films generated from polyvinyl alcohol gave the best results as they not only showed satisfactory film properties but also inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and did not interfere with wound healing.
Seljak et al. developed nanocellulose-based film forming formulations containing betamethasone dipropionate for the treatment of atopic dermatitis [48]. Due to its low water solubility, they formulated the active as a self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system which was subsequently incorporated into nanocellulose-based hydrogels containing additional natural polymers. The films were able to reduce the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) for a short time after application but were found not to be occlusive, as the TEWL returned to normal values after approx. 30 min. The type of nanocellulose used had a significant effect on drug release, where thicker and longer fibers formed bigger pores and thus showed faster release. Altogether, drug release from all tested films was found to be significantly prolonged, which was deemed beneficial for patient compliance [48].
These recent developments show that there still is an unbroken interest in film forming formulations for treatment of various diseases. The polymers used range from hydrophobic polyamides to hydrophilic natural polymers and must be chosen according to disease and drug. Penetration enhancement can be achieved when releasing the drug through amorphous dispersion, and sustained release can be achieved by the combination of a self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) and hydrogels. Film-forming formulations thus represent a versatile formulation concept in topical drug therapy.
4.3. Advanced (Trans)dermal Formulations
It is well known that the key to an effective dermal and transdermal drug delivery system lies in the correct choice of formulation type, as the degree of drug diffusion through the skin is influenced by its composition and structural characteristics. These formulations usually include different types of gels (hydrogels, oleogels, bigels, emulgels, nanogels), emulsions (microemulsions (MEs), nanoemulsions (NEs), multiple emulsions) and systems based on liquid crystals, with the addition of nanotechnologies for the incorporation of APIs into carriers such as liposomes, niosomes, cerosomes, nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), polymer nanoparticles, micelles, dendrimers or carbon nanotubes [49]. Examples of advanced nanoparticulate delivery systems used to improve skin penetration and retention and dermal and transdermal drug delivery are presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example of nanoparticle (NP)-based carriers used as topical, dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems.
The increasing interest in the domain of novel nanoparticulate carriers as topical, dermal and transdermal delivery systems can be proven by the number of published papers in recent years in JCR-indexed journals in the Web of Science (WoS) and PubMed databases (more than 2000 results from 2020 to 2024; search query: [(nanoparticle* OR nanoparticulate) AND (dermal OR transdermal) AND (drug OR cosmetic) AND (delivery)]; query topic: title/abstract/keywords) [50,51]. In order to give a systematic overview of the recent advances and trends in the field, only peer review, open access, full text original research articles written in English were selected (531 candidate papers) before being manually filtered and analyzed (removal of duplicates, inspection of the title, abstract, or full content of the paper, application of established quality criteria) to confirm that they are in scope. A brief survey of some representative reported studies investigating nanoparticles for dermal and transdermal drug delivery, covering the period of the last five years, is presented in Table 2. This list is not exhaustive but aims to summarize the authors’ view of the latest research achievements, future directions and perspectives on this topic.
Table 2.
Summary of selected recent research studies exploring nanoparticle-based topical, dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems (publication years 2020–2024).
Some studies conducted by our research group [114,115,116] were related to the formulation of MEs, NEs (high- or low-energy) or in the form of SLNs or NLCs as carriers for APIs with different mechanisms of action, as follows: the NSAIDs (aceclofenac and ibuprofen), tacrolimus, sertaconazole-nitrate and curcumin with the use of chemical penetration enhancers (different monoterpenes) or physical procedures to improve penetration into the skin (solid or soluble microneedles or iontophoresis). For instance, aceclofenac MEs based on biocompatible sucrose esters (laurate or myristate) showed superiority compared to those stabilized with polysorbate 80 with different cosurfactants (isopropyl alcohol vs. Transcutol P), as demonstrated by the total amount of aceclofenac that permeated the SC and the plasma concentrations of a model drug in rats in an in vivo PK study [114]. Furthermore, when investigating the influence of the combined application of biocompatible lecithin-based NEs stabilized by sucrose esters and solid microneedles on the delivery of the same API using in vitro release/in vivo permeation tests (tape stripping and differential tape stripping on the pig ear skin), the superiority of sucrose ester-based over polysorbate-based NEs was confirmed. In addition, the ratio of plasma concentrations of aceclofenac and its major metabolite diclofenac was significantly altered in rats after administration of NEs compared to the intravenous solution of aceclofenac, which was further significantly improved after pretreatment of rat skin with microneedles, with the result that the combination of microneedles with sucrose palmitate-co-stabilized lecithin-based NEs was useful in achieving higher concentrations of the model drug in the skin, while the combination of microneedles with polysorbate 80-costabilized NEs was more successful in improving the delivery of aceclofenac into the systemic circulation [115].
Further analysis of recently published results indicates an interesting study evaluating the formulation of a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) with ketorolac tromethamine based on jute-derived nanocrystalline cellulose used to develop a transdermal bionanocomposite patch that also contained methylcellulose and chitosan and was prepared by a solvent evaporation technique. However, this study lacks in vivo PK data for a more realistic assessment of the carrier’s success in the transdermal delivery of the model drug [117].
A review of the FDA’s clinical trials database (ClinicalTrials.Gov) [118] shows that 621 clinical trials have been approved in recent years that include the term “transdermal therapeutic system” as one of the key words, so these trials are at various stages of implementation. The amount of studies with the status “completed” or “completed with results” is 437, while 50 studies have the status “terminated” or “terminated with results” and some are marked as “withdrawn”, “suspended” or “unknown status” [118]. Most of the studies are still ongoing, and it is expected that some of them will contribute with positive results to a final approval of the tested TTS/TDDS in the near future. Despite a relatively large number of clinical trials, there are currently 34 approved TTS products on the market worldwide [119]. Searching the Orange Book (“Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations”) database [120], 30 innovator and 66 generic transdermal drug products were identified, of which 40 drug products were authorized for market by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the last five years (6 innovator drugs, 34 generic drugs). Details of FDA-approved, mainly originator (brand name) transdermal drug products are given in Table 3.
Table 3.
Summary of FDA approved transdermal drug products [120,121].
It should be emphasized that none of the approved transdermal products are based on nanoparticulate carriers [118], although the number of original research studies and review articles addressing this topic is continuously increasing [49,119,122]. To further demonstrate the pertinent achievements in topical and transdermal drug delivery, the data from the FDA’s clinical trials database ClinicalTrials.gov [118] were manually retrieved and analyzed based on detailed inspection of the trial overview (name, summary, description) and application of specified criteria designating the quality of trial and its relevance to the review topic. An overview of selected clinical studies associated with nanoparticulate systems is provided in Table 4 that allows for identifying the current state, future trends and open issues on this topic from the authors’ point of view.
Table 4.
Presentation of some representative clinical studies involving nanoparticles for topical/dermal and transdermal drug and cosmetic delivery [118].
A review of available patents from 2009 [123] shows that TTS/TDDS innovations at that time were mainly based on techniques to overcome the skin barrier (physical penetration enhancers), such as microporation, needleless injectors, iontophoresis, reverse iontophoresis, phonophoresis, reverse phonophoresis, transdermal delivery based on the use of microneedles, and finally those based on micro/nanoparticle systems such as transferosomes (US20006165500), ethosomes (US5540934), US20060182799A1 and US20060182794A1), microemulsions (US5688761) and the combination of an LP-based TTS with low frequency ultrasound for improved transdermal delivery of high molecular weight proteins (insulin, erythropoietin, interferon (US5814599)). On the other hand, a search in the WIPO patent database [124] with the key terms “transdermal delivery nano” or “dermal delivery nano” reveals 130 published patents in the period 2015–2024 which consist of micro-nanostructures/carriers (MEs/NEs/NPs) and are intended for (trans)dermal delivery of the active ingredient. Some of these patents relate to the improved technology of microneedles characterized by different shapes (hemisphere, rectangle, trapezoid), different spatial orientation, variable size and higher density, i.e., with a much larger number of microneedles per unit area. However, if the phrase “transdermal drug delivery nano” is used for a search, the number is reduced to 70 patent-protected innovations or to 11 patents with the search phrase “dermal drug delivery nano” [124], again without distinguishing between local, regional and systemic drug delivery, in contrast to the approach of Ph. Eur. 11.0 [34], which makes a clear distinction between the following two product categories in the joint monograph patches: (1) cutaneous patches and (2) transdermal patches. This can be illustrated by two typical examples from the above WIPO search.
The first is WIPO 116036004 (2023), which describes a system based on a nanoparticle-loaded soluble microneedle, wherein the microneedles are composed of a matrix material of a high molecular weight polymer and, in the matrix, are nanoparticles based on modified surface poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) copolymers with paroxetine for the treatment of CNS disorders. Microneedles were adapted to guide the transdermal delivery of nanoparticles and subsequent passage of paroxetine across the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which was confirmed in vivo (fluorescence imaging technology) [124]. The second patent (1394/DEL/2011, granted 2018) relates to the formulation of submicron lipid particles incorporated into a gel as a carrier for a combination of drugs for the effective treatment of psoriasis, where it is important to overcome the thickened barrier in the epidermis, regardless of the type of API. Although previous patents have indicated the transdermal application of antipsoriatics in the form of LP-dispersions, NEs or lipid NPs supported by improved biopharmaceutical performance, the above patent deals with the incorporation of a combination of APIs at a total concentration of 0.05% (vitamin D analogs and various corticosteroids) into submicron lipid particles derived from selected lipids (stearic acid, tristearin, trimyristine, Precirol® 5 ATO, Compritol 888 ATO, cetyl palmitate, glyceryl monostearate and/or glyceryl monooleate), finally stabilizing the dispersion of the lipid particles with a Pluronic® F-68 solution followed by incorporation into a hydrophilic polyacrylate-based gel [124]. Table 5 presents a brief summary of selected patents associated with nanoparticulate carriers for dermal and transdermal delivery screened out from the PATENTSCOPE database/WIPO portal over the past five years.
Table 5.
Overview of some recent international and national patents dealing with nanoparticle-based systems for dermal and transdermal drug delivery [124].
The above examples of recently reported original research articles, clinical studies and patent innovations retrieved from the WoS, PubMed/Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and PATENTSCOPE databases clearly evidence continuous interest and increasing demand for nanoparticle-based (trans)dermal delivery systems, also showing that more technologies need to be combined for effective transdermal delivery, such as microneedle-based patches with nanomaterials incorporated into the product to control drug diffusion or improve drug solubility, while a physical enhancement effect is useful to further influence the systemic delivery of the drug. However, significant efforts need to be made to overcome various technological, biological and clinical challenges in developing nanoparticulate drugs, their market entrance and wide acceptance. In the following section, a summary of methods used for studying skin penetration/permeation and (trans)dermal (nano)formulations is given.
5. Methods for Studying Skin Penetration and Formulations
Transdermal drug delivery, as a non-invasive method of administering drugs through the skin into the systemic circulation, has many advantages over conventional routes of administration, such as avoiding first-pass metabolism, reducing side effects, improving patient compliance, and allowing controlled and sustained release of drugs [125]. However, this delivery route also faces many challenges, such as the low permeability of the skin barrier, the variability of skin properties among individuals and body sites and the potential irritation and sensitization of the skin by the drug or the formulation [23]. To overcome these challenges and optimize the design and performance of TTS/TDDS, including nanoparticulate ones, various in vivo and in vitro models have been developed to simulate the skin and evaluate the permeation and absorption of drugs across the skin.
5.1. In Vitro/Ex Vivo Methods
These models are commonly referred to as diffusion chambers, which consist of a donor compartment that contains the drug formulation, a receiver compartment that collects the permeated drug and a membrane that separates the two compartments and mimics the skin barrier [126]. The most widely used natural membrane is the excised human or animal skin, which provides the most realistic representation of the skin structure and function. However, the use of skin samples also poses some limitations, such as ethical issues, availability, variability, storage and handling [127].
To address these limitations, alternative membranes have been proposed, such as synthetic membranes, artificial skin models, and microfluidic devices mounted with cell cultures. These membranes aim to provide a simpler, cheaper, more reproducible and more ethical way of studying transdermal drug delivery while maintaining a reasonable correlation with the skin. In this review, we will compare and contrast three types of diffusion chambers that use the following different membranes: Franz diffusion cells, parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) and skin-on-a-chip (SoC) devices.
5.1.1. Traditional Diffusion Chambers
Franz diffusion cells are the most widely used diffusion chambers for transdermal drug delivery research [19]. They consist of a glass or plastic cell with a cylindrical opening at the bottom where the membrane is mounted and clamped. The donor compartment is filled with the drug formulation and covered with a lid, while the receiver compartment is filled with a buffer solution and stirred by a magnetic bar or helix. The temperature of the system is maintained by a water jacket or a heating plate at 32 °C. The drug concentration in the receiver compartment is measured at different time intervals by sampling or using an online detector.
Franz diffusion cells can accommodate various types of membranes, such as human or animal skin, synthetic membranes (e.g., cellulose acetate, polydimethylsiloxane, silicone rubber, Strat-M, etc.) and artificial skin models (e.g., SkinEthic, EpiDerm) [128]. The choice of the membrane depends on the purpose and scope of the study, as well as the availability and cost of the materials. The main advantage of Franz diffusion cells is that they provide a simple and versatile platform for studying the permeation and absorption of drugs across different membranes, and they can be easily adapted to different experimental conditions and formulations [129]. Moreover, Franz diffusion cells have been extensively validated and standardized, and they are widely accepted by regulatory agencies and industry.
However, Franz diffusion cells also have some drawbacks, such as the high volume of the donor and receiver compartments, which may affect the sink conditions and the thermodynamic activity of the drug, the influence of the acceptor buffer and membrane types, and also that the donor phase is not heated [130]. Furthermore, the classical Franz diffusion cells are static and do not account for the dynamic and complex nature of the skin, including elements such as blood flow, metabolism, inflammation and wound healing. Additionally, Franz diffusion cells are labor-intensive and time-consuming, as they require manual sampling and analysis, and they have a low throughput, as they can only test one drug or formulation at a time. Table 6 shows the three main types of Franz diffusion cells and their advantages and limitations.
Table 6.
Main types of Franz diffusion cells and their properties.
5.1.2. Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay (PAMPA)
PAMPA is a high-throughput screening method that uses a parallel plate system to measure the passive permeability of drugs across an artificial membrane. The system for skin permeability prediction was described by Sinkó et al. [134]. The membrane is composed of a thin layer of lipid solution (e.g., phosphatidylcholine, lecithin, octanol) that is spread on a porous support (e.g., filter paper, cellulose, polycarbonate) [135]. The donor plate contains multiple wells that are filled with the drug solution and covered with the membrane, while the receiver plate contains multiple wells that are filled with a buffer solution and aligned with the donor plate. The drug concentration in the receiver plate is measured by a UV–V is spectrophotometer or a fluorescence detector [136].
PAMPA has several advantages over Franz diffusion cells and SoC devices, such as the simplicity and low cost of the membrane preparation and the system setup, the high-throughput and speed of the assay and the low consumption of the drug and additives [130]. Moreover, PAMPA can be easily modified to mimic different skin conditions and formulations, such as pH, temperature, hydration, and enhancers. Furthermore, PAMPA has been shown to have a good correlation with the permeability of drugs across human and animal skin. However, PAMPA also has some limitations, such as the inability to account for the active transport and metabolism of drugs in the skin, the variability and instability of the membrane properties and the lack of compatibility with some drug classes and formulations, such as ionic, hydrophilic and insoluble drugs [137]. Additionally, PAMPA is a crude and empirical model that does not reflect the realistic structure and function of the skin, and it may not be suitable for predicting the in vivo performance and safety of a TDDS. In conclusion, diffusion chambers are useful tools for studying the release, permeation and absorption of drugs across the skin and optimizing the design and performance of TDDS. However, each type of diffusion chamber has its own advantages and limitations, and no single model can fully capture the complexity and diversity of the skin. Therefore, it is important to select the appropriate diffusion chamber for the specific purpose and scope of the study and to compare and validate the results with other models and methods.
5.1.3. Skin-on-Chip (SoC) Microfluidic Systems
SoC devices are microfluidic systems that mimic the structure and function of the skin in a miniaturized and integrated format. They consist of a microchannel network that contains a porous membrane, where a layer of skin cells (e.g., keratinocytes, fibroblasts, melanocytes, endothelial cells) is cultured [138] or skin tissue [139] is placed and exposed to the drug formulation in the upper channel while a buffer solution flows in the lower channel. The drug concentration in the lower channel can be measured by an online detector or a sampling port. The temperature, pH, oxygen, and nutrient levels of the system can be controlled by a microfluidic pump and a biosensor. To create a physiologically relevant SoC model, it is necessary to consider the main layers (epidermis and dermis) of the skin and its vasculature; selecting an appropriate biocompatible scaffold material and sufficient cell types are also crucial. The blood, lymphatic and extracellular matrix movements and shear stress should also be considered to reproduce the in vivo-like, dynamic physiological microenvironment [140]. Permeability of skins from different species or humans were compared in SoC [141] and changes in the barrier function under diseased conditions were also studied [142]. Finally, the integration of sensors in the SoC should also be considered for real-time monitoring of skin function [143].
SoC devices offer several advantages over Franz diffusion cells, such as the low volume of the donor and receiver compartments, which reduces the amount of drug and buffer required and improves the sink conditions and the thermodynamic activity of the drug. Moreover, SoC devices are dynamic and can simulate the physiological and pathological conditions of the skin, such as blood flow, metabolism, inflammation, and wound healing. Furthermore, SoC devices are automated and high-throughput, as they can test multiple drugs or formulations simultaneously and continuously. However, SoC devices also have some challenges, such as the complexity and cost of the fabrication and operation of the microfluidic system, the difficulty of maintaining the viability and functionality of the skin cells, and the lack of standardization and validation of the device design and performance. Additionally, SoC devices are still far from replicating the full complexity and diversity of the skin, such as the hair follicles, sweat glands, nerve endings and immune cells.
5.2. In Vivo Methods
5.2.1. Transdermal Microdialysis
A versatile technique to investigate transdermal drug transport in preclinical animal models and also in humans is microdialysis, which is widely used for different purposes, like testing the effectivity of penetration enhancer methods like iontophoresis, for assessment of dermal drug formulation for the degree of penetration of active ingredients, for testing the drug-transporter interactions in the cutaneous barrier or for monitoring pathological conditions and their biomarkers in the skin [144]. During the last few decades, the application field of this method shifted from animals to humans. This is obviously a more relevant approach and does not require the scarification of experimental animals. However, these days, the early screening of topical formulations is conducted preferentially on in vitro platforms.
5.2.2. Dermal Open-Flow Microperfusion
A further electronically driven in vivo method is dermal open-flow microperfusion, where minimally invasive probes placed in 0.8 µm skin depth of human thighs to enable sampling and determination of the permeated drug concentration in the dermis [145]. It is highly advantageous that transdermal delivery can be observed and evaluated in vivo with a membrane free system which has no cut off value in regard to limitation of the size of diffused molecules. However, sampling of up to 24 h is described, which can be a disadvantage for the probands, next to a certain risk of dermal infections due to the probes. This technology is undergoing the registration procedure to become a medical device in the EU.
5.2.3. Tape Stripping
With this technique, SC layers are removed one after the other with adhesive tape. The skin-stripping approach is based on the concept that time profiles of the drug concentration in the SC could characterize drug absorption (uptake) and drug elimination out of the SC into the deeper skin layers, where clearance by the circulatory system occurs. Tape stripping is a commonly used technique that is minimally invasive. It is able to yield the concentration profiles of topically applied compounds in vivo by the quantification analysis of the API extracted from the tape strips [146].
5.3. Advanced Analytical Techniques
5.3.1. ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy for Skin Penetration Studies
Apart from using confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) can be used to investigate changes in skin physiology on a molecular level [147] and to monitor drug penetration into the SC [148]. For penetration studies, it is limited to the skin surface due to the limited penetration depth of the IR beam (1–2 µm), but it can be combined with tape stripping to investigate the entire SC [149]. It can be considered complementary to CRS to investigate penetration of nonvolatile molecules possessing characteristic vibrational modes and suitably distinct IR absorbances [150,151].
5.3.2. AFM-IR Spectroscopy for Skin Penetration Studies
In conventional optical techniques, including ATR-FTIR and CRS, spatial resolution is limited by diffraction. Combining IR spectroscopy with atomic force microscopy (AFM), this limitation may be overcome. In AFM-IR, a pulsed laser is focused onto the sample in the proximity of the AFM-tip. When the wavelength of the IR-beam matches the absorption bands of the substance under investigation, thermal heating occurs. This leads to an expansion of the sample which, in turn, generates oscillations of the AFM-cantilever. Therefore, the chemical nature of the substance and the location can be assessed at a resolution similar to that of AFM [152]. The amplitude of the cantilever ringdown decay curve directly correlates with the IR absorbance of the sample. By scanning through the whole wavelength region of interest and measuring the peak-to-peak amplitude of the ringdown signal, an AFM-IR spectrum is generated [153].
Kemel et al. employed the method to investigate the penetration of Janus nanoparticles into the skin [154]. They describe the challenge of the method with respect to its application to skin penetration lying in sample preparation. To obtain suitable samples, the skin had to be cut into thin slices with a cryo-microtome in order to conserve its structure while obtaining thin enough slices for AFM-IR. As the sample thickness impacts the signal intensity, heterogeneous results were obtained across the samples due to their varying thickness (despite cryo-sectioning). Still, the authors were able to deduce from their analysis that Janus carriers most likely do not penetrate intact but rather dissolve in the SC lipids. AFM-IR thus seems to offer great potential in research of nanoparticle uptake into the skin once the sample preparation issues have been solved.
5.3.3. Confocal Raman Spectroscopy (CRS)
Among other spectroscopic methods, CRS has been increasingly used over the past 20 years to investigate skin penetration of active ingredients, humectants and other formulation excipients. Measurement of SC thickness, as well as water and lipid profiles, is also possible [155]. A comprehensive description of the method, its benefits and challenges, as well as more technical information, can be found at Bielfeldt et al. [156]. CRS may be used in vivo as well as ex vivo or in vitro.
Why are both scattered “elastically”? When light interacts with matter, most of the photons are scattered elastically, meaning that they exhibit the same wavelength (Rayleigh scattering). A very small proportion of the photons are scattered elastically, meaning that the wavelength of the scattered light is shifted towards longer or shorter chain lengths compared to the incident light. This is called Stokes and anti-Stokes scattering, and the former is used to generate the Raman spectrum. This spectrum may be divided into two areas, the fingerprint region between 0 and approx. 2000 cm−1 and the high wavenumbers region between approx. 3000 and 4000 cm−1. Each peak is derived from the interaction of light with a specific bond within the molecule, and thus every substance gives its own specific spectrum from which it can be identified and/or tracked within a sample. Mixed samples give mixed spectra () from which the relative contribution of a number () of single species () can be calculated, taking into account their individual Raman spectra () [157]:
To monitor skin penetration, a confocal setup is used that enables focusing the light into different depths of the skin and collecting spectra only from this position by rejecting light from out of focus regions. Then, spectra are taken from consecutive positions, moving from the skin surface to deeper layers. Therefore, a number of mixed spectra are recorded that contain spectral information derived from the skin constituents as well as from the penetrated substance. Using the above formula the relative contribution of the penetrated substance can be calculated and, using a proper calibration, actual quantitative information can be obtained [158]. The principle of CRS technology is presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Top row: Laser light interacts with matter, Stokes scattering provides Raman spectrum, divided into fingerprint and high wavenumber region; Bottom row: laser light focused into different depths of the skin generates one spectrum per skin depth from which the penetration profile is calculated.
Until now, CRS has been used to analyze the penetration of a multitude of substances, starting with water [159], moving on to cosmetic ingredients like urea [160], retinol [158] or caffeine [161] and finally arriving at APIs like procaine [162], diclofenac [163], and vismodegib [164].
Although regulatory bodies have not yet adopted the method in their guidelines, research is generating more and more evidence to correlate CRS data to date from conventional methods like tape stripping. For example, Kourbaj et al. [161] and Krombholz et al. [162] showed that the penetration of caffeine and retinol can be monitored by CRS as well as by tape stripping and provide similar results. They described two important advantages of CRS. First, the confocality, due to which the position from which the spectra and thus the quantitative information is derived, can be adjusted precisely as opposed to tape stripping, where different amounts of SC are removed with each tape and thus the depth from which the quantitative information is derived cannot be controlled. Second, the possibility to measure the penetration kinetics of an active without the need to use excessive amounts of skin samples, like in tape stripping, where one skin sample (or more, depending on the number of repetitions) needs to be used per time point. Krombholz et al. showed that, using a modified diffusion cell that can be mounted under the objective of the Raman microscope, the penetration of actives can be monitored in real time, which gave valuable insights not only on the kinetics of the penetration of the active but also on the kinetics of penetration enhancement [165]. While these measurements were taken ex vivo and in the influx phase, Caspers et al. monitored the kinetics of actives penetration after a short incubation during the depletion phase [158]. From both types of measurements, kinetic parameters like the flux may be calculated, but they may not give the same values as the kinetics of invasion and the depletion may be different, e.g., due to the different penetration kinetics of penetration enhancers, other formulation excipients or water (as an effect of occlusion). Kourbaj et al. provide an illustrative example on how the obtained flux values differ between data collected in different phases. According to their findings, especially for fast penetrating substances, care must be taken to use suitable time points for flux calculation, as time points too close to steady state conditions will give erroneously low flux values [161]. From the current research, it can be deduced that there is an ongoing interest in the method due to the advantages detailed above. In order to enable regulatory acceptance of CRS for bioavailability and bioequivalence testing, even more evidence needs to be provided, especially when it comes to the exact methodology, including selection of time points. Furthermore, the applicability of CRS for skin penetration analysis remains to be shown for more substances from more formulations.
5.3.4. Soft X-ray Scanning
X-ray scanning has been used for investigation of cells and tissues and has most recently also been utilized in skin penetration analysis. In scanning X-ray microscopy, X-rays are focused onto a small focal volume and the sample is raster-scanned to create an image. X-ray scanning has the advantage that X-rays penetrating deeper into tissues, as they exhibit shorter wavelengths than light [166]. As a result, higher spatial resolution is provided and the 2D as well as 3D analysis of complex samples, like skin, is rendered with a resolution as low as 10 nm [167]. Furthermore, X-ray scanning is a label-free technique and does not rely on staining or the use of contrast agents; thus, the penetration characteristics of a drug molecule under investigation are not altered. While high-energy (hard) X-rays create atomic fluorescence, which may be used to quantify elemental compositions and crystal lattice structures, lower-energy (soft) X-rays may be used to study magnetic states, the orientation of chemical bonds and complex chemistries such as drugs and tissue components [168]. Soft X-rays also yield improved contrasts in organic matter due to the high absorption cross sections of C, O and N shells and thus are better suited to investigating tissues. Operation of soft X-ray microscopes takes place in the “water-window”, a spectral region between the K shell absorption edges of C (284 eV, l = 4.4 nm) and O (543 eV, l = 2.3 nm) where X-rays are absorbed significantly more strongly by organic molecules than by water; therefore, contrast is enhanced by an order of magnitude [167].
Soft X-ray scanning is almost exclusively applied to skin penetration research by one group [169,170,171,172] and instruments do not seem to be as yet readily available. Soft X-ray scanning has been used to investigate the skin penetration of dexamethasone with and without prior tape stripping and with the use of core-multishell nanocarriers [169,170]. Also, the impact of serine protease or petrolatum on the skin penetration of rapamycin has been investigated [171,172].
6. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of the Skin Penetration
6.1. Homogenized Membrane Model
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of dermal absorption provides an alternative method for the fast and cost-effective bioavailability and bioequivalence assessment of topical drugs and cosmetic care products. One particular advantage of PBPK modeling is its robustness and flexibility. It can be easily adopted to simulate either in vitro or ex vivo permeation tests [173] or in vivo exposure studies. PBPK modelling of dermal absorption has been around for several decades and has received increasing interest in recent times [174]. Most PBPK modeling uses mechanistic equations to describe the underlying pharmacokinetics of transdermal permeation using the diffusion-partition theory, with the skin barrier being considered as a homogenized membrane. The mathematical equation describing skin solute permeation through the homogenized skin membrane is described by Fick’s law of diffusion as:
where J is the flux and c and D are concentration and diffusivity, respectively. Early PBPK modeling of skin penetration was limited to the steady-state of in vitro permeation tests. The flux of skin penetration has been calculated by the following equation:
Here , and are the homogenised diffusion coefficient, partition coefficient and thickness of the SC, respectively, and cv is the concentration of permeant in the donor vehicle.
The maximum flux of skin penetration is reached when the concentration cv in the vehicle reaches saturated solubility :
PBPK modeling of skin permeation across the homogenized SC barrier in transient conditions has been reported using either numerical solutions or analytical solutions [175]. Under the infinite dose condition, where the accumulative amount of tested solute permeated into the skin is less than 10% during a 24 h permeation test, the Crank equation of diffusion across a planar membrane can be adapted [176]:
from which the accumulative amount of permeant diffused across the skin barrier is obtained as:
Here is the vehicle-water partition coefficient of permeant. Under an infinite dose condition, typically with a vehicle thickness of more than 150 µm [177], the accumulative amount approaches a steady state after a lag time, and the relationship is described as:
where the lag time is given as:
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in permeation testing under finite dose conditions to mimic more closely the in-use conditions, typically with a vehicle thickness of less than 50 µm, e.g., [178]. Analytical solutions for skin absorption and permeation under finite dose conditions have been also reported, and the readers are referred to elsewhere, for example, the study reported by Anissimov and Roberts using the Laplace transformation [175].
6.2. Microscopic Modeling of SC Permeation Pathways
At the microscopic level, solute transfer through the SC barrier is 3D. To model the 3D microscopic effect, the governing equation for solute transfer can be formulated separately for the SC lipid, corneocytes, viable dermis, dermis and appendage domains. For the “brick and mortar” microstructure of the SC, an analytical expression for the permeability of the tortuous lipid pathway was presented by Michaels et al. [179] as follows:
Johnson et al. evaluated the diffusion path length of the SC intercellular lipid for a 3D geometry of the “bricks and mortar” and proposed a different equation for the tortuosity factor, as follows [180]:
where is the number of the corneocyte layers, ω = dm/dn is the offset ratio and is the intercellular gap in horizontal and vertical directions.
For solute diffusion in SC corneocytes, binding of the solute to keratin needs to be considered. Reported studies suggest that solute binding to keratin correlates to the hydrophobicity [181]. Corneocytes have been often modeled as porous media consisting of primarily fibrous keratin [182]. The volume fraction of the porous fluid depends on the hydration level. Most microscopic PBPK modeling of percutaneous absorption requires a numerical solution. Each of the heterogenous domains of the skin barrier are meshed to sufficiently fine elements or grids. The following generalized numerical scheme can be adopted to calculate the solute diffusion from each meshed grid to its neighboring grid by the following numerical scheme:
where is the flux of solute from grid to grid , and are the partition coefficients of solute between grid and water and between grid and water, and are the concentrations of solute, and are the diffusion lengths of grid and and and are the diffusivity of solute in grid and respectively. For each grid, Equation (11) is substituted into the following mass balance equation:
The above equations are solved using numerical methods. Figure 4 shows an example of microscopic PBPK modeling of a 4-cyanophenol disposition in the SC lipids and corneocytes where experimental data were obtained by tape striping on health volunteers [183]. There is a significant amount of 4-cyanophenol permeated into SC corneocytes. The overall amount predicted by the microscopic PBPK modeling agreed well with the experimental data.
Figure 4.
Microscopic PBPK modeling of 4-cyanophenol disposition in SC lipids (a) and corneocytes (b) domains under in vivo exposure to healthy volunteers at 1 min(-------) (•), 5 min (- - -) (×) and 15 min (………) (■). Predicted overall disposition (c) by combining both lipids and corneocytes domains showed good agreement with tape striping data. Figure modified from [183] with permission of John Wiley and sons at the License Number 5810360623095.
Figure 5 shows another example of the microscopic PBPK modeling of caffeine deposition in SC lipids and corneocyte domains, as well as the systemic bioavailability, where caffeine was applied on the chests of healthy volunteers [184]. Here, the effect of hair follicle pore blocking was investigated. An important aspect revealed by the microscopic PBPK modeling is that caffeine diffused faster in the hair follicle gap than in the SC lipids. The hair follicle pathway not only contributed to the ca. 25% systemic bioavailability of the caffeine but also led to faster delivery with an earlier arrival of .
Figure 5.
Microscopic PBPK modeling of caffeine deposition in SC lipids and corneocytes domains after 20 min application to the chest of health volunteers (above). The predicted effect of hair follicle open (a) and blocked (b) on systemic bioavailability agreed well with experimental data. Figure adopted from [163] open access.
Other microscopic PBPK modeling studies of transdermal permeation have also been reported elsewhere [185]. The so-called two-phase model of Wang et al. [185] is very similar to the microscopic PBPK model reported by Chen et al. [182,183]. The two-phase model of Wang et al. has been primarily limited to fitting to skin permeability data [185]. Despite PBPK modeling having been reported on from time to time for several decades, and despite significant progress being made, challenges still remain. Most PBPK modeling is limited to case-by-case scenarios with the input parameters being fitted to experimental data. Extrapolation to other exposure scenarios is difficult. Another challenge is the lack of understanding of formulation impacts. PBPK modeling of how complex formulation ingredients and product microstructures modulate percutaneous absorption is rather limited. Solute transport in the cornified envelope of the lipid domain is heterogenous, anisotropic and dependent on the lipid bilayer structure. Molecular dynamic simulations of solute permeation through SC lipid bilayer have been reported recently [186]. Of particular interest is how hydration and exposure to the chemicals of skin care and dermatological products, as well as environmental pollutants, affect the integrity of SC lipids. It has been revealed that, while the integrity of SC lipids is retained when exposed to different hydration and glycerol, fatty acid extraction is observed when SC lipids are exposed to ethanol [187]. It can be envisaged that advancements in molecular dynamics and multiscale methods will make PBPK modeling of dermal absorption a more widely adopted tool.
7. Outlook—Current Approaches and Research Trends
Classic strategies to dermally administer drugs with small molecular masses and high potencies will continue to rely on passive diffusion and/or formulation strategies using chemical enhancers. However, delivery of biotech drugs, i.e., large hydrophilic peptides and macromolecules, will in many cases rely on the use of more advanced enhancers and/or active enhancement strategies, especially for delivery of genetic material such as DNA, RNA and/or vaccines [125]. The examples below highlight the potential of TDDSs to complement or replace existing pharmaceutic delivery systems for administration of large molecular mass cargoes, providing benefits such as high specificity, reduced side-effects, and good patient compliance.
Shin et al. [188] evaluated a hydrophobic cell-penetrating peptide (CPP, MTD 1067) for delivery of protein cargoes of various sizes, including growth-hormone-releasing-hexapeptide-6, a truncated form of insulin-like growth factor-I, and a platelet-derived growth factor. MTD-conjugated cargoes were non-toxic and exhibited biological activities that were identical or improved when compared to the unconjugated control. Confocal microscopy showed higher levels in the dermis (4.4-, 18.8-, and 32.9-times higher than the control), emphasizing the potential of CPP-conjugation for transdermal delivery of macromolecular drugs. In another recent approach, Kang et al. [189] developed functionalized nanocarriers with CPPs for enhancement of transdermal delivery. The basic vehicles exhibited specific self-assembly and penetration efficiency in dependence of their amino acid composition, indicating that tailor-made vehicles can be designed for delivery of different actives.
Rentzsch et al. [28] explored the use of conventional intradermal injection and NanoPass microneedles to deliver a small-molecule specific ligand of Langerin conjugated to a model protein antigen into human skin explants. Selective loading of Langerhans cells in the epidermis was achieved with both methods. However, conventional intradermal injections, albeit approved by regulatory agencies and cost-efficient, require trained personnel and bear the risk of needle-caused injury and low patient compliance. The FDA-approved NanoPass microneedles allow for safe and painless administration without prolonged training and thus provide relevant advantages as intradermal delivery systems for vaccination. Van der Straeten et al. [190] reported successful intradermal delivery of a mRNA vaccine in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vehicle using a thermostable microneedle patch; a long-term immune response comparable to intramuscular administration was observed in mice. This study highlights the potential of TDDSs to facilitate vaccination programs also in countries with insufficient infrastructures in regard to handling thermo-sensitive administration systems.
The goal of needle-free transdermal application of biomacromolecules was likewise targeted by Zhu et al. [191], who developed a transdermal delivery platform based on biocompatible fluorocarbon modified chitosan, proposed for antibody and antigen delivery. Mouse models were used to test the penetration potential and induced immune responses, suggesting promising results.
8. Conclusions
Topical, dermal and transdermal delivery presents an emerging route of drug administration, owing to its inherent advantages/benefits, such as non-invasive application, by-pass of rapid first-pass metabolism, avoidance/reduction in off-site toxicity and systemic adverse effects, increasing bioavailability, possibility of controlled and sustained drug release, and, hence, improved therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance. Looking at the pool of reported studies, clinical trials and patent innovations in recent years, it is apparent that many works and efforts have been devoted to the development and application of advanced topical/transdermal formulations and methods, as well as to skin penetration-enhancing techniques. Although many advancements have been already achieved in the field, formulation and optimization of safe, effective and marketable nanoparticle-based topical and transdermal delivery systems still remains challenging, keeping in mind elements such as skin barrier properties, low skin permeability, interindividual and inter-site variability, potential for skin irritation and sensitization, among others. This further imposes the need for employment of innovative nanotechnological strategies and advanced analytical techniques to support the development of nano-drug transdermal formulations through comprehensive evaluation and prediction of their skin penetration/permeation and, particularly, in vivo fate.
As a future direction, beside the above-mentioned innovations, the administration of large molecular mass cargoes with novel drug delivery systems, e.g., the intradermal delivery of mRNA vaccines, is expected to provide benefits such as high specificity, reduced side effects and good patient compliance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, D.L., V.K., A.E., S.S., G.L. and F.E.; visualization, D.L., V.K., A.E., S.M.S. and G.L.; writing—review and editing, S.M.S., S.S. and F.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology, Hungary with support from the National Research Development and Innovation Fund under the TKP2021 program through grant no. TKP2021-EGA-42. This research was also funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation, Republic of Serbia through two Grant Agreements with University of Belgrade-Faculty of Pharmacy No 451-03-65/2024-03/ 200161 and No 451-03-66/2024-03/ 200161.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Martha Kovach for English proofreading and Dorottya Kocsis (Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics) for the careful preparation and editing of list of references.
Conflicts of Interest
Author Sanela M. Savic was employed by the company DCP Hemigal (Leskovac, Serbia). The company had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be considered as a potential conflict of interest.
References
- Souto, E.B.; Baldim, I.; Oliveira, W.P.; Rao, R.; Yadav, N.; Gama, F.M.; Mahant, S. SLN and NLC for topical, dermal, and transdermal drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 357–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wertz, P.W.; van den Bergh, B. The physical, chemical and functional properties of lipids in the skin and other biological barriers. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1998, 91, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silver, F.H.; Freeman, J.W.; DeVore, D. Viscoelastic properties of human skin and processed dermis. Ski. Res. Technol. 2001, 7, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elias, P.M. Epidermal Lipids, Barrier Function, and Desquamation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1983, 80, S44–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kawana, M.; Miyamoto, M.; Ohno, Y.; Kihara, A. Comparative profiling and comprehensive quantification of stratum corneum ceramides in humans and mice by LC/MS/MS S. J. Lipid Res. 2020, 61, 884–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eichner, A.; Sonnenberger, S.; Dobner, B.; Hauss, T.; Schroeter, A.; Neubert, R.H.H. Localization of methyl-branched ceramide EOS species within the long-periodicity phase in stratum corneum lipid model membranes: A neutron diffraction study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2016, 1858, 2911–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rousel, J.; Nadaban, A.; Saghari, M.; Pagan, L.; Zhuparris, A.; Theelen, B.; Gambrah, T.; van der Wall, H.E.C.; Vreeken, R.J.; Feiss, G.L.; et al. Lesional skin of seborrheic dermatitis patients is characterized by skin barrier dysfunction and correlating alterations in the stratum corneum ceramide composition. Exp. Dermatol. 2024, 33, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouwstra, J.A.; Ponec, M. The skin barrier in healthy and diseased state. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2006, 1758, 2080–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madison, K.C. Barrier function of the skin: “La Raison d’Etre” of the epidermis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2003, 121, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.Q.; Yang, X.; Wu, X.F.; Fan, Y.B. Enhancing Permeation of Drug Molecules Across the Skin via Delivery in Nanocarriers: Novel Strategies for Effective Transdermal Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tfayli, A.; Jamal, D.; Vyumvuhore, R.; Manfait, M.; Baillet-Guffroy, A. Hydration effects on the barrier function of stratum corneum lipids: Raman analysis of ceramides 2, III and 5. Analyst 2013, 138, 6582–6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.J.; Kim, M. Skin Barrier Function and the Microbiome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atkinson, J.P.; Maibach, H.I.; Dragicevic, N. Targets in Dermal and Transdermal Delivery and Classification of Penetration Enhancement Methods. In Percutaneous Penetration Enhancers Chemical Methods in Penetration Enhancement: Drug Manipulation Strategies and Vehicle Effects; Dragicevic, N., Maibach, H.I., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 93–108. [Google Scholar]
- Otberg, N.; Patzelt, A.; Rasulev, U.; Hagemeister, T.; Linscheid, M.; Sinkgraven, R.; Sterry, W.; Lademann, J. The role of hair follicles in the percutaneous absorption of caffeine. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008, 65, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Busch, L.; Avlasevich, Y.; Zwicker, P.; Thiede, G.; Landfester, K.; Keck, C.M.; Meinke, M.C.; Darvin, M.E.; Kramer, A.; Müller, G.; et al. Release of the model drug SR101 from polyurethane nanocapsules in porcine hair follicles triggered by LED-derived low dose UVA light. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 597, 120339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Évora, A.S.; Adams, M.J.; Johnson, S.A.; Zhang, Z. Corneocytes: Relationship between Structural and Biomechanical Properties. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2021, 34, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, W.; Liu, Z.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Yin, R.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Qian, X.; Zhang, H. 3D skin models along with skin-on-a-chip systems: A critical review. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 107819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randall, M.J.; Jüngel, A.; Rimann, M.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. Advances in the Biofabrication of 3D Skin in vitro: Healthy and Pathological Models. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhar, B.; Das, E.; Manikumar, K.; Mandal, B.B. 3D Bioprinted Human Skin Model Recapitulating Native-Like Tissue Maturation and Immunocompetence as an Advanced Platform for Skin Sensitization Assessment. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, 2303312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, B.W. Dermatological Formulations: Percutaneous Absorption; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Hadgraft, J.; Guy, R. Biotechnological Aspects of Transport Across Human Skin. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2004, 21, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haque, T.; Talukder, M.M.U. Chemical Enhancer: A Simplistic Way to Modulate Barrier Function of the Stratum Corneum. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 8, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, A.C.; Barry, B.W. Penetration enhancers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovácik, A.; Kopecná, M.; Hrdinová, I.; Opálka, L.; Bettex, M.B.; Vávrová, K. Time-Dependent Differences in the Effects of Oleic Acid and Oleyl Alcohol on the Human Skin Barrier. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 6237–6245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Bian, J.; Hantash, B.M.; Albakr, L.; Hibbs, D.E.; Xiang, X.; Xie, P.; Wu, C.; Kang, L. Enhanced skin retention and permeation of a novel peptide via structural modification, chemical enhancement, and microneedles. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 606, 120868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Xiao, W.; Zhong, W.; Xi, C.; Ye, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, H.; Du, S. Study of the skin-penetration promoting effect and mechanism of combined system of curcumin liposomes prepared by microfluidic chip and skin penetrating peptides TD-1 for topical treatment of primary melanoma. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 643, 123256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lobo, S.; Yan, G. Improving the direct penetration into tissues underneath the skin with iontophoresis delivery of a ketoprofen cationic prodrug. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 535, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rentzsch, M.; Wawrzinek, R.; Zelle-Rieser, C.; Strandt, H.; Bellmann, L.; Fuchsberger, F.F.; Schulze, J.; Busmann, J.; Rademacher, J.; Sigl, S.; et al. Specific Protein Antigen Delivery to Human Langerhans Cells in Intact Skin. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jhanker, Y.; Mbano, M.N.; Ponto, T.; Espartero, L.J.L.; Yamada, M.; Prow, T.; Benson, H.A.E. Comparison of physical enhancement technologies in the skin permeation of methyl amino levulinic acid (mALA). Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 610, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.; Jung, J.H.; Tadros, A.R.; Prausnitz, M.R. Tolerability, acceptability, and reproducibility of topical STAR particles in human subjects. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on Cosmetic Products. 2009. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/47f167ec-b5db-4ec9-9d12-3d807bf3e526_en (accessed on 13 January 2024).
- Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community Code Relating to Medicinal Products for Human Use. Volume 311. 2001. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/directive-200183ec-european-parliament-and-council-6-november-2001-community-code-relating-medicinal-products-human-use_en.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2024).
- Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on Medical Devices, Amending Di-rective 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (Text with EEA Relevance.). Volume 117. 2017. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745 (accessed on 13 January 2024).
- European Pharmacopoiea (Ph. Eur.). Monograph. In Semisolid Dosage Forms for Cutaneous Use, 11th ed.; European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare: Strasbourg, France, 2023.
- Kapoor, K.; Gräfe, N.; Herbig, M.E. Topical Film-Forming Solid Solutions for Enhanced Dermal Delivery of the Retinoid Tazarotene. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 111, 2779–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinter, A.; Green, L.J.; Selmer, J.; Praestegaard, M.; Gold, L.S.; Augustin, M.; Trial Investigator, G. A pooled analysis of randomized, controlled, phase 3 trials investigating the efficacy and safety of a novel, fixed dose calcipotriene and betamethasone dipropionate cream for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2022, 36, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Rosso, J.; Sugarman, J.; Green, L.; Lain, T.; Levy-Hacham, O.; Mizrahi, R.; Gold, L.S. Efficacy and safety of microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide and microencapsulated tretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris: Results from two phase 3 double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2023, 89, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lunter, D.J.; Daniels, R. New film forming emulsions containing Eudragit® NE and/or RS 30D for sustained dermal delivery of nonivamide. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2012, 82, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lunter, D.; Daniels, R. In vitro Skin Permeation and Penetration of Nonivamide from Novel Film-Forming Emulsions. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2013, 26, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heck, R.; Hermann, S.; Lunter, D.J.; Daniels, R. Film-forming formulations containing porous silica for the sustained delivery of actives to the skin. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 108, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gennari, C.G.M.; Selmin, F.; Franzè, S.; Musazzi, U.M.; Quaroni, G.M.G.; Casiraghi, A.; Cilurzo, F. A glimpse in critical attributes to design cutaneous film forming systems based on ammonium methacrylate. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2017, 41, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- VCI-Position zum ECHA-Vorschlag zur Beschränkung von Polymer. Available online: https://www.vci.de/themen/chemikaliensicherheit/reach/vci-position-echa-vorschlag-beschraenkung-polymere-als-absichtlich-eingesetztes-mikroplastik.jsp (accessed on 13 January 2024).
- Pantelić, I.; Lukić, M.; Gojgić-Cvijović, G.; Jakovljević, D.; Nikolić, I.; Lunter, D.J.; Daniels, R.; Savić, S. Bacillus licheniformis levan as a functional biopolymer in topical drug dosage forms: From basic colloidal considerations to actual pharmaceutical application. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 142, 105109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidberger, M.; Nikolic, I.; Pantelic, I.; Lunter, D. Optimization of Rheological Behaviour and Skin Penetration of Thermogelling Emulsions with Enhanced Substantivity for Potential Application in Treatment of Chronic Skin Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padula, C.; Nicoli, S.; Colombo, P.; Santi, P. Single-layer transdermal film containing lidocaine: Modulation of drug release. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2007, 66, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, A.S.; Kim, J.; Park, J.W.; Jin, S.G. Novel acyclovir-loaded film-forming gel with enhanced mechanical properties and skin permeability. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 70, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamsai, B.; Soodvilai, S.; Opanasopit, P.; Samprasit, W. Topical Film-Forming Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sprays for Antiseptic Application. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seljak, K.B.; Zorec, B.S.; Matjaz, M.G. Nanocellulose-Based Film-Forming Hydrogels for Improved Outcomes in Atopic Skin. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schafer, N.; Balwierz, R.; Biernat, P.; Ochędzan-Siodłak, W.; Lipok, J. Natural Ingredients of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems as Permeation Enhancers of Active Substances through the Stratum Corneum. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 3278–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WoS. Web of Science Core Collection. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/basic-search (accessed on 23 April 2024).
- PubMed. National Library of Medicine. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 23 April 2024).
- Xia, Y.; Cao, K.; Jia, R.Y.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Z.Q.; Xia, H.M.; Xu, Y.X.; Xie, Z.L. Tetramethylpyrazine-loaded liposomes surrounded by hydrogel based on sodium alginate and chitosan as a multifunctional drug delivery System for treatment of atopic dermatitis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 193, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qu, F.; Sun, Y.F.; Bi, D.H.; Peng, S.Y.; Li, M.; Liu, H.M.; Zhang, L.B.; Tao, J.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhu, J.T. Regulating Size and Charge of Liposomes in Microneedles to Enhance Intracellular Drug Delivery Efficiency in Skin for Psoriasis Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, F.; Cheng, Z.E.; Yi, H.X. NIR light-activatable dissolving microneedle system for melanoma ablation enabled by a combination of ROS-responsive chemotherapy and phototherapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lamie, C.; Elmowafy, E.; Ragaie, M.H.; Attia, D.A.; Mortada, N.D. Assessment of antifungal efficacy of itraconazole loaded aspasomal cream: Comparative clinical study. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alsaidan, O.A.; Zafar, A.; Al-Ruwaili, R.H.; Yasir, M.; Alzarea, S.I.; Alsaidan, A.A.; Singh, L.; Khalid, M. Niosomes gel of apigenin to improve the topical delivery: Development, optimization, ex vivo ex vivo permeation, antioxidant study, and in vivo evaluation. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2023, 51, 604–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anjum, A.; Shabbir, K.; Din, F.U.; Shafique, S.; Zaidi, S.S.; Almari, A.H.; Alqahtani, T.; Maryiam, A.; Khan, M.M.; Al Fatease, A.; et al. Co-delivery of amphotericin B and pentamidine loaded niosomal gel for the treatment of Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moghtaderi, M.; Bazzazan, S.; Sorourian, G.; Sorourian, M.; Akhavanzanjani, Y.; Noorbazargan, H.; Ren, Q. Encapsulation of Thymol in Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMa)-Based Nanoniosome Enables Enhanced Antibiofilm Activity and Wound Healing. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, M.S.; Elkady, O.A.; Amer, M.A.; Noshi, S.H. Exploiting response surface D-optimal design study for preparation and optimization of spanlastics loaded with miconazole nitrate as a model antifungal drug for topical application. J. Pharm. Innov. 2023, 18, 2402–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nousheen, K.; Din, F.U.; Jamshaid, H.; Afza, R.; Khan, S.U.; Malik, M.; Ali, Z.; Batool, S.; Zeb, A.; Yousaf, A.M.; et al. Metformin HCl-loaded transethosomal gel; development, characterization, and antidiabetic potential evaluation in the diabetes-induced rat model. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asghar, Z.; Jamshaid, T.; Sajid-ur-Rehman, M.; Jamshaid, U.; Gad, H.A. Novel Transethosomal Gel Containing Miconazole Nitrate; Development, Characterization, and Enhanced Antifungal Activity. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bashir, S.; Shabbir, K.; Din, F.U.; Khan, S.U.; Ali, Z.; Khan, B.A.; Kim, D.W.; Khan, G.M. Nitazoxanide and quercetin co-loaded nanotransfersomal gel for topical treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with macrophage targeting and enhanced anti-leishmanial effect. Heliyon 2023, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Tai, Z.G.; Ma, J.Y.; Miao, F.Z.; Xin, R.J.; Shen, C.E.; Shen, M.; Zhu, Q.A.; Chen, Z.J. Lycorine transfersomes modified with cell-penetrating peptides for topical treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumari, S.; Alsaidan, O.A.; Mohanty, D.; Zafar, A.; Das, S.; Gupta, J.K.; Khalid, M. Development of Soft Luliconazole Invasomes Gel for Effective Transdermal Delivery: Optimization to In-Vivo Antifungal Activity. Gels 2023, 9, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.Z.; Huang, Q.B.; Song, Y.T.; Feng, X.Q.; Zeng, L.J.; Liu, Z.H.; Hu, X.M.; Tao, C.; Wang, L.; Qi, Y.F.; et al. Cubosomes-assisted transdermal delivery of doxorubicin and indocyanine green for chemo-photothermal combination therapy of melanoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 166, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prabahar, K.; Uthumansha, U.; Elsherbiny, N.; Qushawy, M. Enhanced Skin Permeation and Controlled Release of β-Sitosterol Using Cubosomes Encrusted with Dissolving Microneedles for the Management of Alopecia. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, B.; Thakkar, H. Formulation Development of Fast Dissolving Microneedles Loaded with Cubosomes of Febuxostat: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albash, R.; Yousry, C.; Al-Mahallawi, A.M.; Alaa-Eldin, A.A. Utilization of PEGylated cerosomes for effective topical delivery of fenticonazole nitrate: In-vitro characterization, statistical optimization, and in-vivo assessment. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pervaiz, F.; Saba, A.; Yasin, H.; Buabeid, M.; Noreen, S.; Khan, A.K.; Murtaza, G. Fabrication of solid lipid nanoparticles-based patches of paroxetine and their ex-vivo permeation behaviour. Artif. Cell Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2023, 51, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samee, A.; Usman, F.; Wani, T.A.; Farooq, M.; Shah, H.S.; Javed, I.; Ahmad, H.; Khan, R.; Zargar, S.; Kausar, S. Sulconazole-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antifungal Activity: In Vitro and In Vivo Approach. Molecules 2023, 28, 7508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renukuntla, J.; Peterson-Sockwell, S.; Clark, B.A.; Godage, N.H.; Gionfriddo, E.; Bolla, P.K.; Boddu, S.H.S. Design and Preclinical Evaluation of Nicotine-Stearic Acid Conjugate-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Transdermal Delivery: A Technical Note. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aceto, G.; Di Muzio, L.; Di Lorenzo, R.; Laneri, S.; Cairone, F.; Cesa, S.; Petralito, S.; Paolicelli, P.; Casadei, M.A. Dual delivery of ginger oil and hexylresorcinol with lipid nanoparticles for the effective treatment of cutaneous hyperpigmentation. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 87, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folle, C.; Sánchez-López, E.; Mallandrich, M.; Díaz-Garrido, N.; Suñer-Carbó, J.; Halbaut, L.; Carvajal-Vidal, P.; Marqués, A.M.; Espina, M.; Badia, J.; et al. Semi-solid functionalized nanostructured lipid carriers loading thymol for skin disorders. Int. J. Pharm. 2024, 651, 123732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spanou, K.; Barbosa, A.I.; Detsi, A.; Lima, S.A.C.; Reis, S. Development and characterization of gel-like matrix containing genistein for skin application. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 90, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatem, S.; El-Kayal, M. Novel anti-psoriatic nanostructured lipid carriers for the cutaneous delivery of luteolin: A comprehensive in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 191, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Unnisa, A.; Chettupalli, A.K.; Alazragi, R.S.; Alelwani, W.; Bannunah, A.M.; Barnawi, J.; Amarachinta, P.R.; Jandrajupalli, S.B.; Elamine, B.A.; Mohamed, O.A.; et al. Nanostructured Lipid Carriers to Enhance the Bioavailability and Solubility of Ranolazine: Statistical Optimization and Pharmacological Evaluations. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, N.; Rincón, M.; Silva-Abreu, M.; Sosa, L.; Pesantez-Narvaez, J.; Calpena, A.C.; Rodríguez-Lagunas, M.J.; Mallandrich, M. Semi-Solid Dosage Forms Containing Pranoprofen-Loaded NLC as Topical Therapy for Local Inflammation: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo Evaluation. Gels 2023, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadag, S.; Narayan, R.; Nayak, A.S.; Ardila, D.C.; Sant, S.; Nayak, Y.; Garg, S.; Nayak, U.Y. Development and preclinical evaluation of microneedle-assisted resveratrol loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for localized delivery to breast cancer therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 606, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arunprasert, K.; Pornpitchanarong, C.; Piemvuthi, C.; Siraprapapornsakul, S.; Sripeangchan, S.; Lertsrimongkol, O.; Opanasopit, P.; Patrojanasophon, P. Nanostructured lipid carrier-embedded polyacrylic acid transdermal patches for improved transdermal delivery of capsaicin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 173, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, G.D.S.; Loureiro, A.I.S.; Rodrigues, J.L.; Barros, P.A.B.; Halicki, P.C.B.; Ramos, D.F.; Marinho, M.A.G.; Vaiss, D.P.; Vaz, G.R.; Yurgel, V.C.; et al. Toward a Platform for the Treatment of Burns: An Assessment of Nanoemulsions vs. Nanostructured Lipid Carriers Loaded with Curcumin. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdallah, M.H.; Abu Lila, A.S.; El-Nahas, H.M.; Ibrahim, T.M. Optimization of Potential Nanoemulgels for Boosting Transdermal Glimepiride Delivery and Upgrading Its Anti-Diabetic Activity. Gels 2023, 9, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alhasso, B.; Ghori, M.U.; Conway, B.R. Development of a Nanoemulgel for the Topical Application of Mupirocin. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sita, V.G.; Vavia, P. Bromocriptine Nanoemulsion-Loaded Transdermal Gel: Optimization Using Factorial Design, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2020, 21, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almehmady, A.M.; Ali, S.A. Transdermal Film Loaded with Garlic Oil-Acyclovir Nanoemulsion to Overcome Barriers for Its Use in Alleviating Cold Sore Conditions. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Myburgh, J.; Liebenberg, W.; Willers, C.; Dube, A.; Gerber, M. Investigation and Evaluation of the Transdermal Delivery of Ibuprofen in Various Characterized Nano-Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pathak, S.; Sahu, P.; Begum, J.P.S.; Kashaw, S.K.; Pandey, A.; Semwal, P.; Sharma, R. Formulation and assessment of penetration potential of Risedronate chitosan nanoparticles loaded transdermal gel in the management of osteoporosis: In vitro and ex vivo screening. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, Z.; Pandey, M.; Thu, H.E.; Kaur, T.; Jia, G.W.; Ying, P.C.; Xian, T.M.; Abourehab, M.A.S. Hyaluronic acid functionalization improves dermal targeting of polymeric nanoparticles for management of burn wounds: In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 150, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahmash, E.Z.; Attiany, L.M.; Ali, D.; Assaf, S.M.; Alkrad, J.; Alyami, H. Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patches Using Novel Thymoquinone-L-Arginine-Based Polyamide Nanocapsules for Potential Use in the Management of Psoriasis. AAPS PharmSciTech 2024, 25, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radmard, A.; Banga, A.K. Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery of Lurasidone Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, Y.Q.; Zheng, Y.X.; Pan, X.H.; Huang, Y.P.; Kang, Y.X.; Zhong, W.Y.; Xu, K.M. Enzyme-me diate d fabrication of nanocomposite hydrogel microneedles for tunable mechanical strength and controllable transdermal efficiency. Acta Biomater. 2024, 174, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dilawar, N.; Ur-Rehman, T.; Shah, K.U.; Fatima, H.; Alhodaib, A. Development and Evaluation of PLGA Nanoparticle-Loaded Organogel for the Transdermal Delivery of Risperidone. Gels 2022, 8, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matos, B.N.; Lima, A.L.; Cardoso, C.O.; Cunha, M.; Gratieri, T.; Gelfuso, G.M. Follicle-Targeted Delivery of Betamethasone and Minoxidil Co-Entrapped in Polymeric and Lipid Nanoparticles for Topical Alopecia Areata Treatment. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Q.; Deng, H.Y.; Liang, B.H.; Li, R.X.; Li, H.P.; Ke, Y.A.; Zhu, H.L. A convergent synthetic platform of hydrogels enclosing prednisolone-loaded nanoparticles for the treatment of chronic actinic dermatitis. Mater. Technol. 2023, 38, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayed, S.; Shekh, M.; Song, J.X.; Sun, Q.; Dai, H.; Xue, V.W.; Liu, S.S.; Du, B.; Zhou, G.Q.; Stadler, F.J.; et al. ISX9 loaded thermoresponsive nanoparticles for hair follicle regrowth. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 23, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oh, H.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.H.; Shin, Y.C.; Choi, W.I. Super-Antioxidant Vitamin A Derivatives with Improved Stability and Efficacy Using Skin-Permeable Chitosan Nanocapsules. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hatem, S.; Elkheshen, S.A.; Kamel, A.O.; Nasr, M.; Moftah, N.H.; Ragai, M.H.; Elezaby, R.S.; El Hoffy, N.M. Functionalized chitosan nanoparticles for cutaneous delivery of a skin whitening agent: An approach to clinically augment the therapeutic efficacy for melasma treatment. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 1212–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slavkova, M.; Lazov, C.; Spassova, I.; Kovacheva, D.; Tibi, I.P.E.; Stefanova, D.; Tzankova, V.; Petrov, P.D.; Yoncheva, K. Formulation of Budesonide-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles into Hydrogels for Local Therapy of Atopic Dermatitis. Gels 2024, 10, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, X.Y.; Sun, Y.Y.; Han, M.S.; Chen, D.Y.; He, X.Y.; Wang, S.Q.; Sun, K.X. Triptorelin nanoparticle-loaded microneedles for use in assisted reproductive technology. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azimi, B.; Ricci, C.; Macchi, T.; Günday, C.; Munafò, S.; Maleki, H.; Pratesi, F.; Tempesti, V.; Cristallini, C.; Bruschini, L.; et al. A Straightforward Method to Produce Multi-Nanodrug Delivery Systems for Transdermal/Tympanic Patches Using Electrospinning and Electrospray. Polymers 2023, 15, 3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, B.; Kim, M.; Won, H.; Jung, A.; Kim, J.; Koo, Y.; Lee, N.K.; Baek, S.H.; Han, U.; Park, C.G.; et al. Secured delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor using human serum albumin-based protein nanoparticles for enhanced wound healing and regeneration. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.X.; Sun, Y.F.; Nie, L.; Shavandi, A.; Yunusov, K.E.; Hua, Y.J.; Jiang, G.H. Fabrication of carboxymethyl cellulose/hyaluronic acid/polyvinylpyrrolidone composite pastes incorporation of minoxidil-loaded ferulic acid-derived lignin nanoparticles and valproic acid for treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 249, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darade, A.R.; Lapteva, M.; Ling, V.C.; Kalia, Y.N. Polymeric micelles for cutaneous delivery of the hedgehog pathway inhibitor TAK-441: Formulation development and cutaneous biodistribution in porcine and human skin. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 644, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awad, H.; Rawas-Qalaji, M.; El Hosary, R.; Jagal, J.; Ahmed, I.S. Formulation and optimization of ivermectin nanocrystals for enhanced topical delivery. Int. J. Pharm. X 2023, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomic, I.; Miocic, S.; Pepic, I.; Simic, D.; Filipovic-Grcic, J. Efficacy and Safety of Azelaic Acid Nanocrystal-Loaded In Situ Hydrogel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.C.; Li, J.Y.; Wang, J.H.; Pan, Y.X.; Liang, S.L.; Hu, Y.H.; Wang, L. Multifunctional fucoidan-loaded Zn-MOF-encapsulated microneedles for MRSA-infected wound healing. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bursy, D.; Balwierz, R.; Groch, P.; Biernat, P.; Byrski, A.; Kasperkiewicz, K.; Ochedzan-Siodlak, W. Nanoparticles coated by chloramphenicol in hydrogels as a useful tool to increase the antibiotic release and antibacterial activity in dermal drug delivery. Pharmacol. Rep. 2023, 75, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abu-Huwaij, R.; Abed, M.; Hamed, R. Innovative transdermal doxorubicin patches prepared using greenly synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles for breast cancer treatment. Mater. Technol. 2024, 39, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, T.; Zhu, Y.T.; Li, K.Q.; Hao, K.; Chai, Y.Q.; Jiang, H.Y.; Lou, C.; Yu, J.C.; Yang, W.; Wang, J.L.; et al. Microneedles loaded with cerium-manganese oxide nanoparticles for targeting macrophages in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, Y.E.; Yan, A.Q.; Qiang, W.; Ruan, R.; Yang, C.B.; Ma, K.; Sun, H.M.; Liu, M.X.; Zhu, H.D. Selective Delivery of Tofacitinib Citrate to Hair Follicles Using Lipid-Coated Calcium Carbonate Nanocarrier Controls Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Areata. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fereig, S.; El-Zaafarany, G.M.; Arafa, M.; Abdel-Mottaleb, M.M.A. Boosting the anti-inflammatory effect of self-assembled hybrid lecithin-chitosan nanoparticles via hybridization with gold nanoparticles for the treatment of psoriasis: Elemental mapping and in vivo modeling. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 1726–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghani, P.; Akbari, A.; Saadatkish, M.; Varshosaz, J.; Kouhi, M.; Bodaghi, M. Acceleration of Wound Healing in Rats by Modified Lignocellulose Based Sponge Containing Pentoxifylline Loaded Lecithin/Chitosan Nanoparticles. Gels 2022, 8, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.M.; Chen, H.; Chu, Z.Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, B.J.; Sun, J.A.; Lai, W.; Ma, Y.; He, Y.L.; Qian, H.S.; et al. A multifunctional composite hydrogel as an intrinsic and extrinsic coregulator for enhanced therapeutic efficacy for psoriasis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chao, S.S.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Cheng, S.H.; Shao, X.Z.; Liu, S.L.; Lu, W.J.; Wang, Y.F.; Zhang, P.P.; Yao, Q.Q. Ibuprofen-Loaded ZnO Nanoparticle/Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers for Dual-Stimulus Sustained Release of Drugs. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 5535–5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todosijević, M.N.; Savić, M.M.; Batinić, B.B.; Marković, B.D.; Gašperlin, M.; Ranđelović, D.V.; Lukić, M.Ž.; Savić, S.D. Biocompatible microemulsions of a model NSAID for skin delivery: A decisive role of surfactants in skin penetration/irritation profiles and pharmacokinetic performance. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 496, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilić, T.; Savić, S.; Batinić, B.; Marković, B.; Schmidberger, M.; Lunter, D.; Savić, M.; Savić, S. Combined use of biocompatible nanoemulsions and solid microneedles to improve transport of a model NSAID across the skin: In vitro and in vivo studies. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 125, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savić, V.; Ilić, T.; Nikolić, I.; Marković, B.; Čalija, B.; Cekić, N.; Savić, S. Tacrolimus-loaded lecithin-based nanostructured lipid carrier and nanoemulsion with propylene glycol monocaprylate as a liquid lipid: Formulation characterization and assessment of dermal delivery compared to referent ointment. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 569, 118624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.S.; Bhunia, P.; Samanta, A.P.; Orasugh, J.T.; Chattopadhyay, D. Transdermal therapeutic system: Study of cellulose nanocrystals influenced methylcellulose-chitosan bionanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 218, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ClinicalTrials.Gov. Search Clinical Studies and Their Results. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- Wong, W.F.; Ang, K.P.; Sethi, G.; Looi, C.Y. Recent Advancement of Medical Patch for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Med. Lith. 2023, 59, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/search_product.cfm (accessed on 1 June 2024).
- Drugs@FDA: FDA-Approved Drugs. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm (accessed on 2 June 2024).
- Bird, D.; Ravindra, N.M. Transdermal drug delivery and patches—An overview. Med. Devices Sens. 2020, 3, e10069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizwan, M.; Aqil, M.; Talegaonkar, S.; Azeem, A.; Sultana, Y.; Ali, A. Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery Techniques: An Extensive Review of Patents. Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul. 2009, 3, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WIPO. The World Intellectual Property Organization. PATENTSCOPE—Search International and National Patent Collections. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/search.jsf (accessed on 10 May 2024).
- Prausnitz, M.R.; Mitragotri, S.; Langer, R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hadgraft, J.; Lane, M.E. Skin permeation: The years of enlightenment. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 305, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bouwstra, J.A.; Honeywell-Nguyen, P.L.; Gooris, G.S.; Ponec, M. Structure of the skin barrier and its modulation by vesicular formulations. Prog. Lipid Res. 2003, 42, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Netzlaff, F.; Lehr, C.M.; Wertz, P.W.; Schaefer, U.F. The human epidermis models EpiSkin, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: An evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity, and substance transport. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005, 60, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sebe, I.; Zsidai, L.; Zelkó, R. Novel modified vertical diffusion cell for testing of in vitro drug release (IVRT) of topical patches. HardwareX 2022, 11, e00293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Józsa, L.; Nemes, D.; Peto, A.; Kósa, D.; Révész, R.; Bácskay, I.; Haimhoffer, A.; Vasvári, G. Recent Options and Techniques to Assess Improved Bioavailability: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Methods. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Franz, T.J. Percutaneous Absorption. On the Relevance of in Vitro Data. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1975, 64, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, N.; Jain, S.; Lin, S. Transdermal iontophoretic delivery of tacrine hydrochloride: Correlation between in vitro permeation and in vivo performance in rats. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 513, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puri, A.; Frempong, D.; Mishra, D.; Dogra, P. Microneedle-mediated transdermal delivery of naloxone hydrochloride for treatment of opioid overdose. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 604, 120739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinkó, B.; Garrigues, T.M.; Balogh, G.T.; Nagy, Z.K.; Tsinman, O.; Avdeef, A.; Takács-Novák, K. Skin–PAMPA: A new method for fast prediction of skin penetration. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 45, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, H.; Wang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Shen, M.; Li, H.; Duan, Y. A new PAMPA model proposed on the basis of a synthetic phospholipid membrane. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, H.; Nguyen, K.; Kerns, E.; Yan, Z.; Yu, K.R.; Shah, P.; Jadhav, A.; Xu, X. Highly predictive and interpretable models for PAMPA permeability. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 1266–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rácz, A.; Vincze, A.; Volk, B.; Balogh, G.T. Extending the limitations in the prediction of PAMPA permeability with machine learning algorithms. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 188, 106514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tarnoki-Zách, J.; Mehes, E.; Varga-Medveczky, Z.; Isai, D.G.; Barany, N.; Bugyik, E.; Revesz, Z.; Paku, S.; Erdo, F.; Czirok, A. Development and Evaluation of a Human Skin Equivalent in a Semiautomatic Microfluidic Diffusion Chamber. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lukács, B.; Bajza, A.; Kocsis, D.; Csorba, A.; Antal, I.; Iván, K.; Laki, A.J.; Erdo, F. Skin-on-a-Chip Device for Ex Vivo Monitoring of Transdermal Delivery of Drugs-Design, Fabrication, and Testing. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ponmozhi, J.; Dhinakaran, S.; Kocsis, D.; Iván, K.; Erdo, F. Models for barrier understanding in health and disease in lab-on-a-chips. Tissue Barriers 2024, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kocsis, D.; Klang, V.; Schweiger, E.-M.; Varga-Medveczky, Z.; Mihály, A.; Pongor, C.; Révész, Z.; Somogyi, Z.; Erdő, F. Characterization and ex vivo evaluation of excised skin samples as substitutes for human dermal barrier in pharmaceutical and dermatological studies. Ski. Res. Technol. 2022, 28, 664–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kocsis, D.; Horváth, S.; Kemény, Á.; Varga-Medveczky, Z.; Pongor, C.; Molnár, R.; Mihály, A.; Farkas, D.; Naszlady, B.M.; Fülöp, A.; et al. Drug Delivery through the Psoriatic Epidermal Barrier—A “Skin-On-A-Chip” Permeability Study and Ex Vivo Optical Imaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoio, P.; Oliva, A. Skin-on-a-Chip Technology: Microengineering Physiologically Relevant In Vitro Skin Models. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdo, F.; Hashimoto, N.; Karvaly, G.; Nakamichi, N.; Kato, Y. Critical evaluation and methodological positioning of the transdermal microdialysis technique. A review. J. Control. Release 2016, 233, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodenlenz, M.; Höfferer, C.; Magnes, C.; Schaller-Ammann, R.; Schaupp, L.; Feichtner, F.; Ratzer, M.; Pickl, K.; Sinner, F.; Wutte, A.; et al. Dermal PK/PD of a lipophilic topical drug in psoriatic patients by continuous intradermal membrane-free sampling. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2012, 81, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Au, W.L.; Skinner, M.F.; Kanfer, I. Comparison of tape stripping with the human skin blanching assay for the bioequivalence assessment of topical clobetasol propionate formulations. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 13, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwarz, J.C.; Pagitsch, E.; Valenta, C. Comparison of ATR-FTIR spectra of porcine vaginal and buccal mucosa with ear skin and penetration analysis of drug and vehicle components into pig ear. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 50, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoppel, M.; Baurecht, D.; Holper, E.; Mahrhauser, D.; Valenta, C. Validation of the combined ATR-FTIR/tape stripping technique for monitoring the distribution of surfactants in the stratum corneum. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 472, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binder, L.; Kulovits, E.M.; Petz, R.; Ruthofer, J.; Baurecht, D.; Klang, V.; Valenta, C. Penetration monitoring of drugs and additives by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy/tape stripping and confocal Raman spectroscopy—A comparative study. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2018, 130, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pirot, F.; Kalia, Y.N.; Stinchcomb, A.L.; Keating, G.; Bunge, A.; Guy, R.H. Characterization of the permeability barrier of human skin in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 1562–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McAuley, W.J.; Chavda-Sitaram, S.; Mader, K.T.; Tetteh, J.; Lane, M.E.; Hadgraft, J. The effects of esterified solvents on the diffusion of a model compound across human skin: An ATR-FTIR spectroscopic study. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 447, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kästner, B.; Marschall, M.; Hornemann, A.; Metzner, S.; Patoka, P.; Cortes, S.; Wübbeler, G.; Hoehl, A.; Rühl, E.; Elster, C. Compressed AFM-IR hyperspectral nanoimaging. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2024, 35, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcott, C.; Padalkar, M.; Pleshko, N. 3.23 Infrared and Raman Microscopy and Imaging of Biomaterials at the Micro and Nano Scale☆. In Comprehensive Biomaterials II; Ducheyne, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 498–518. [Google Scholar]
- Kemel, K.; Deniset-Besseau, A.; Baillet-Guffroy, A.; Faivre, V.; Dazzi, A.; Laugel, C. Nanoscale investigation of human skin and study of skin penetration of Janus nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 579, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kocsis, D.; Kichou, H.; Döme, K.; Varga-Medveczky, Z.; Révész, Z.; Antal, I.; Erdő, F. Structural and Functional Analysis of Excised Skins and Human Reconstructed Epidermis with Confocal Raman Spectroscopy and in Microfluidic Diffusion Chambers. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielfeldt, S.; Bonnier, F.; Byrne, H.J.; Chourpa, I.; Dancik, Y. Monitoring dermal penetration and permeation kinetics of topical products; the role of Raman microspectroscopy. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 156, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Confocal Raman Microscopy, 2nd ed.; Jan Toporski, T.D., Hollricher, O., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 66, p. 596. [Google Scholar]
- Caspers, P.J.; Nico, C.; Bakker Schut, T.C.; de Sterke, J.; Pudney, P.D.A.; Curto, P.R.; Illand, A.; Puppels, G.J. Method to quantify the in vivo skin penetration of topically applied materials based on confocal Raman spectroscopy. Transl. Biophotonics 2019, 1, e201900004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albèr, C.; Brandner, B.D.; Björklund, S.; Billsten, P.; Corkery, R.W.; Engblom, J. Effects of water gradients and use of urea on skin ultrastructure evaluated by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2013, 1828, 2470–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egawa, M.; Sato, Y. In vivo evaluation of two forms of urea in the skin by Raman spectroscopy after application of urea-containing cream. Ski. Res. Technol. 2015, 21, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kourbaj, G.; Gaiser, A.; Bielfeldt, S.; Lunter, D. Assessment of penetration and permeation of caffeine by confocal Raman spectroscopy in vivo and ex vivo by tape stripping. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2023, 45, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krombholz, R.; Liu, Y.L.; Lunter, D.J. In-Line and Off-Line Monitoring of Skin Penetration Profiles Using Confocal Raman Spectroscopy. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iliopoulos, F.; Goh, C.F.; Haque, T.; Rahma, A.; Lane, M.E. Dermal Delivery of Diclofenac Sodium-In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, G.E.; Calienni, M.N.; Alonso, S.D.; Alvira, F.C.; Montanari, J. Raman Spectroscopy to Monitor the Delivery of a Nano-Formulation of Vismodegib in the Skin. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krombholz, R.; Lunter, D. A New Method for In-Situ Skin Penetration Analysis by Confocal Raman Microscopy. Molecules 2020, 25, 4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kourousias, G.; Pascolo, L.; Marmorato, P.; Ponti, J.; Ceccone, G.; Kiskinova, M.; Gianoncelli, A. High-resolution scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy for rapid probing of nanoparticle distribution and sufferance features in exposed cells. X-ray Spectrom. 2015, 44, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larabell, C.A.; Nugent, K.A. Imaging cellular architecture with X-rays. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, D.A.; Babin, S.; Celestre, R.S.; Chao, W.L.; Conley, R.P.; Denes, P.; Enders, B.; Enfedaque, P.; James, S.; Joseph, J.M.; et al. An ultrahigh-resolution soft x-ray microscope for quantitative analysis of chemically heterogeneous nanomaterials. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto, K.; Klossek, A.; Flesch, R.; Rancan, F.; Weigand, M.; Bykova, I.; Bechtel, M.; Ahlberg, S.; Vogt, A.; Blume-Peytavi, U.; et al. Influence of the skin barrier on the penetration of topically-applied dexamethasone probed by soft X-ray spectromicroscopy. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 118, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto, K.; Klossek, A.; Flesch, R.; Ohigashi, T.; Fleige, E.; Rancan, F.; Frombach, J.; Vogt, A.; Blume-Peytavi, U.; Schrade, P.; et al. Core-multishell nanocarriers: Transport and release of dexamethasone probed by soft X-ray spectromicroscopy. J. Control. Release 2016, 242, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germer, G.; Ohigashi, T.; Yuzawa, H.; Kosugi, N.; Flesch, R.; Rancan, F.; Vogt, A.; Rühl, E. Improved Skin Permeability after Topical Treatment with Serine Protease: Probing the Penetration of Rapamycin by Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscopy. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 12213–12222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germer, G.; Ohigashi, T.; Yuzawa, H.; Kosugi, N.; Flesch, R.; Rancan, F.; Vogt, A.; Rühl, E. Soft X-ray scanning transmission microscopy as a selective probe of topical dermal drug delivery: The role of petrolatum and occlusion. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2023, 266, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.J.; Han, L.J.; Saib, O.; Lian, G.P. In Silico Prediction of Percutaneous Absorption and Disposition Kinetics of Chemicals. Pharm. Res. 2015, 32, 1779–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moxon, T.E.; Li, H.Q.; Lee, M.Y.; Piechota, P.; Nicol, B.; Pickles, J.; Pendlington, R.; Sorrell, I.; Baltazar, M.T. Application of physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling in the next generation risk assessment of dermally applied consumer products. Toxicol. Vitro 2020, 63, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anissimov, Y.G.; Roberts, M.S. Diffusion modeling of percutaneous absorption kinetics: 2. Finite vehicle volume and solvent deposited solids. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 90, 504–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1975; p. 414. [Google Scholar]
- Coderch, L.; Collini, I.; Carrer, V.; Barba, C.; Alonso, C. Assessment of Finite and Infinite Dose In Vitro Experiments in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iliopoulos, F.; Caspers, P.J.; Puppels, G.J.; Lane, M.E. Franz Cell Diffusion Testing and Quantitative Confocal Raman Spectroscopy: In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michaels, A.S.; Chandrasekaran, S.K.; Shaw, J.E. Drug permeation through human skin: Theory and invitro experimental measurement. AIChE J. 1975, 21, 985–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M.E.; Blankschtein, D.; Langer, R. Evaluation of solute permeation through the stratum corneum: Lateral bilayer diffusion as the primary transport mechanism. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 86, 1162–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.M.; Chen, L.J.; Lian, G.P.; Han, L.J. Determination of partition and binding properties of solutes to stratum corneum. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 398, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.J.; Lian, G.P.; Han, L.J. Modeling Transdermal Permeation. Part I. Predicting Skin Permeability of Both Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Solutes. AIChE J. 2010, 56, 1136–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lian, G.P.; Chen, L.J.; Pudney, P.D.A.; Mélot, M.; Han, L.J. Modeling Transdermal Permeation. Part 2. Predicting the Dermatopharmacokinetics of Percutaneous Solute. AIChE J. 2010, 56, 2551–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kattou, P.; Lian, G.; Glavin, S.; Sorrell, I.; Chen, T. Development of a Two-Dimensional Model for Predicting Transdermal Permeation with the Follicular Pathway: Demonstration with a Caffeine Study. Pharm. Res. 2017, 34, 2036–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.F.; Kasting, G.B.; Nitsche, J.M. A multiphase microscopic diffusion model for stratum corneum permeability. II. estimation of physicochemical parameters, and application to a large permeability database. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 96, 3024–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundborg, M.; Wennberg, C.; Lidmar, J.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E.; Norlén, L. Skin permeability prediction with MD simulation sampling spatial and alchemical reaction coordinates. Biophys. J. 2022, 121, 3837–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piasentin, N.; Lian, G.P.; Cai, Q. In Silico Prediction of Stratum Corneum Partition Coefficients via COSMOmic and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2023, 127, 2719–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, H.J.; Bak, S.U.; La, H.N.; Kang, J.S.; Lee, H.H.; Eom, H.J.; Lee, B.K.; Kang, H.A. Efficient transdermal delivery of functional protein cargoes by a hydrophobic peptide MTD 1067. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.H.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kang, D.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, K.; Jeong, W.-J. Self-Assembled Skin-Penetrating Peptides with Controlled Supramolecular Properties for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- vander Straeten, A.; Sarmadi, M.; Daristotle, J.L.; Kanelli, M.; Tostanoski, L.H.; Collins, J.; Pardeshi, A.; Han, J.L.; Varshney, D.; Eshaghi, B.; et al. A microneedle vaccine printer for thermostable COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.; Wei, T.; Xu, Y.; Jin, Q.; Chao, Y.; Lu, J.; Xu, J.; Zhu, J.; Yan, X.; Chen, M.; et al. Non-invasive transdermal delivery of biomacromolecules with fluorocarbon-modified chitosan for melanoma immunotherapy and viral vaccines. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).