Next Article in Journal
Correction: Lee et al. The Synergistic Inhibition of Coronavirus Replication and Induced Cytokine Production by Ciclesonide and the Tylophorine-Based Compound Dbq33b. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1511
Next Article in Special Issue
2-Styrylchromones Prevent IL-1β-Induced Pro-Inflammatory Activation of Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes while Increasing COX-2 Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanism for Stabilizing an Amorphous Drug Using Amino Acids within Co-Amorphous Blends
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-Inflammatory Properties of (R)-(-)-Carvone: Potential Roles of JNK1, Nrf2 and NF-κB
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/pharmaceutics15020341
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Essential Oils from Côa Valley Lamiaceae Species: Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Effect on Glioblastoma Cells

by
Mário Pedro Marques
1,2,†,
Beatriz Guapo Neves
1,2,†,
Carla Varela
1,3,
Mónica Zuzarte
1,2,
Ana Cristina Gonçalves
4,5,
Maria Inês Dias
6,7,
Joana S. Amaral
6,7,
Lillian Barros
6,7,
Mariana Magalhães
1,2,8,9 and
Célia Cabral
1,2,10,*
1
Clinic Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Chemical Process Engineering and Forest Products Research Centre (CIEPQPF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
4
Laboratory of Oncobiology and Hematology, University Clinic of Hematology and Applied Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
5
Group of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
6
Mountain Research Centre (CIMO), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (IPB), Campus Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
7
Associate Laboratory for Sustainability and Technology in Mountains Regions (SusTEC), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (IPB), Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
8
PhD Programme in Experimental Biology and Biomedicine, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research (IIIUC), University of Coimbra, Casa Costa Alemão, 3030-789 Coimbra, Portugal
9
CNC—Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
10
Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(2), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020341
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 15 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Natural Products and Their Derivatives for Metabolic and Chronic Inflammatory Disease Therapy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lavandula pedunculata (Mill.) Cav., Mentha cervina L. and Thymus mastichina (L.) L. subsp. mastichina are representative species of the Côa Valley’s flora, a Portuguese UNESCO World Heritage Site. L. pedunculata and T. mastichina are traditionally used to preserve olives and to aromatize bonfires on Saint John’s Eve, while M. cervina is mainly used as a spice for river fish dishes. Despite their traditional uses, these aromatic plants are still undervalued, and literature regarding their bioactivity, especially anticancer, is scarce. In this work, the morphology of secretory structures was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the composition of essential oils (EOs) was characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The study proceeded with cytotoxic evaluation of EOs in tumor and non-tumor cells with the cell death mechanism explored in glioblastoma (GB) cells. L. pedunculata EO presented the most pronounced cytotoxic/antiproliferative activity against tumor cells, with moderate cytotoxicity against non-tumor cells. Whereas, M. cervina EO exhibited a slightly lower cytotoxic effect against tumor cells and did not affect the viability of non-tumor cells. Meanwhile, T. mastichina EO did not induce a strong cytotoxic effect against GB cells. L. pedunculata and M. cervina EOs lead to cell death by inducing apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. The present study suggests that L. pedunculata and M. cervina EOs have a strong cytotoxic and antiproliferative potential to be further studied as efficient antitumor agents.

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma (GB), the most common primary glioma of the central nervous system (CNS), is characterized by a highly heterogeneous and diffuse invading nature. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), this adult-type diffuse glioma is classified as a grade IV tumor (highly malignancy level) [1]. Despite the advances in the clinic to improve patient survival, the overall average survival rate for GB is only 15–21 months after diagnosis, with just a 5% probability of survival in the 5 years post-diagnosis [2,3,4]. These numbers are not surprising, being explained by the late diagnosis and poor prognosis of GB. Thus, to hinder this situation, the current first-line treatment available for GB includes maximal surgical resection followed by concomitant cycles of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (temozolomide (TMZ)) [3,4,5,6,7]. Although, these treatments have several limitations, such as incomplete surgical resection or development of multidrug resistance (MDR), that provoke patient relapse [8]. Hence, novel, efficient, and site-specific therapeutic approaches are urgently required, in which plant-based phytoproducts can be considered an interesting and appealing solution.
Since ancient times and across all populations, the therapeutic value of plants was validated by their wide use in traditional medicine to treat various diseases, including cancer [8,9]. The well-known therapeutic significance attributed to plants usually resides in the secondary metabolites they produce. These metabolites represent an important source of bioactive molecules in the process of discovery and development of new pharmacologically active compounds, particularly for cancer therapy [3,10,11]. In fact, several chemotherapy agents currently in clinical use derived from plants or were inspired in the chemical structure of plant-extracted compounds [12,13].
Essential oils (EOs), obtained from aromatic plant species, are examples of complex mixtures of volatile secondary metabolites with huge therapeutic potential [9]. They are produced and stored in specialized structures, internal or external, and are characterized by the presence of small molecular weight oxygenated compounds and hydrocarbons, mainly monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. These compounds are well-known for their therapeutic value, including antitumor activity [10,14,15]. Hereby, some studies have explored the antitumor potential of EOs and their isolated compounds, either as chemotherapeutic agents or as adjuvants to conventional therapy, against cancer cells, uncovering their mechanism of action (e.g., inducing cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair) [10,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Lamiaceae is the sixth largest flowering plant family in the world, with more than 7000 species and 250 genera, showing a worldwide distribution and being recognized for several EO-bearing plants [2,23]. Moreover, the antitumor properties of EOs from plant species of the Lamiaceae family are widely recognized and reported [10,23,24].
The Côa Valley, in the Northeast of Portugal has been recognized as UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1998. Despite its paleolithic value, its natural resources should also be valorized and preserved. From this perspective, the following three Lamiaceae species: Lavandula pedunculata (Mill.) Cav. (L. pedunculata), Mentha cervina L. (M. cervina) and Thymus mastichina L. (L.) subsp. mastichina (T. mastichina) stand out given their prevalence in the territory, ethnobotanical uses and cultural value, which makes their medicinal traditional uses worthy of validation. L. pedunculata is an aromatic shrub widely spread throughout the west Mediterranean region, namely in the Iberian Peninsula, North Africa, and Turkey. In Portugal, it is mostly used in religious ceremonies to aromatize bonfires on Saint John’s Eve, as well for ornamental purposes. In traditional medicine, L. pedunculata has been used as a therapeutic agent with antiseptic action for cleaning wounds, in infusions for internal and external applications, and is recommended for the respiratory and digestive systems [25,26,27]. M. cervina, commonly known as Hart’s pennyroyal, is an aromatic herb that grows on the edges of flooded areas, riverbanks, and wet places. However, because of excessive harvesting and habitat destruction, natural populations have been disappearing. Its traditional use is mostly associated with food seasoning, namely river fish dishes, besides this, it is used for the prevention of gastric disorders and inflammations of respiratory origin [28,29,30]. T. mastichina is an Iberian endemic thyme species also used as a food spice [31], and with potential applications in the perfume and cosmetic industry [32]. It is also used in several health conditions due to its antiseptic, digestive, antirheumatic, and antitussive effects [32,33,34,35,36]. The pharmacological validation of this thyme has been focused on several biological activities, particularly anti-inflammatory [37], antioxidant [38], anti-carcinogenic [38] and antifungal [39].
Despite the great potential of these species as valuable sources of bioactive molecules, the literature survey revealed limited work regarding their EOs, namely their antitumor potential. Therefore, in order to overcome this liability, their chemical composition and the morphology of the secretory structures was fully addressed. Following this, the EOs from these three species were tested as potential cytotoxic agents using a robust panel of cell models of GB. Their tumor-specific cytotoxic profile was also assessed in a non-tumor cell line. The EOs with the most pronounced cytotoxic effects were further evaluated regarding their cell death profile and impact on cell cycle regulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Plant samples of L. pedunculata (Figure 1A), M. cervina (Figure 1C) and T. mastichina (Figure 1E) during their flowering stage, in April 2022, July 2021, and May 2021, respectively. The three studied plants were harvested in river Côa Valley (Portugal). Specifically, L. pedunculata was collected next to the Museum and Côa Parque Foundation (41.080504, −7.110663), M. cervina in Côa riverbanks of the paleolithic rock-art site of Penascosa (41.005644, −7.105894), while T. mastichina was collected near to the village of Muxagata (41.028215, −7.146840). Voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Aveiro (AVE), under the numbers AVE156 for L. pedunculata, AVE425 for M. cervina and AVE221 for T. mastichina. After harvesting, the plants were kept in the dark, at room temperature (25 °C), until EOs extraction. Fresh plant samples were in turn used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis.

2.2. Essential Oils Isolation

EOs were extracted from the aerial parts in the flowering stage of the three studied species, by hydrodistillation for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus, according to the protocol described in the European Pharmacopoeia [40]. The isolated EOs were stored at 4 °C in appropriate dark glass vials and kept in the dark.

2.3. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

The essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (GC-MS) using a GC-2010 Plus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) system equipped with a AOC-20iPlus automatic injector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a SH-RXi-5 ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan, USA). The conditions used were the described by Spréa et al. [41], as follows: the initial oven temperature was set at 40 °C for 4 min, then raised at 3 °C/min to 175 °C, then raised at 15 °C/min to 300 °C, and held for 7 min; the temperatures of the injector, transfer line and ion source were 260 °C, 280 °C and 220 °C, respectively. The ionization energy was 70 eV and a scan range of 35–500 u with a scan time of 0.3 s was used. A volume of 1 μL of each sample diluted 1:100 in hexane was injected with a split ratio of 1:40, with helium being used as the carrier gas, adjusted to a linear velocity of 30 cm/s. The compounds were identified by comparison of spectra with NIST17 mass spectral library and by determining the linear retention index (LRI) based on the retention times obtained for a mixture of n-alkanes (C8–C40, ref. 40147-U, Supelco) analyzed under identical conditions. The calculated LRI was compared with previously published data [10]. Compounds were quantified as a relative percentage of total volatiles using the relative area values directly obtained from peak total ion current (TIC). Analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

For SEM analysis, leaves of L. pedunculata, M. cervina and T. mastichina were segmented into small pieces and placed on adhesive carbon stickers (12 mm, Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) above metallic stubs. Then, without further preparations, they were observed using a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (Flex SEM 1000, HITACHI, Raleigh, NA, USA) in freeze conditions (−20 °C) and at an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV, as stated in [42].

2.5. Cell Culture

U87 (brain-like glioblastoma), A172 (glioblastoma), and H4 (neuroglioma) cell lines were generously supplied by Professor Carla Vitorino (Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal). U118 (astrocytoma/glioblastoma) and U373 (astrocytoma/glioblastoma) cell lines were kindly gifted by Professor Maria Conceição Pedroso de Lima (Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal). HEK-293 (immortalized human embryonic kidney fibroblasts) was kindly provided by Professor Paulo Oliveira (Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal). Cells were cultivated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium-high glucose (DMEM-HG) (Biowest, Nuaille’, France) supplemented with 10% (v/v) of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 1% (v/v) of penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Throughout the experiments, cells were used at 80% confluence, and monitored by microscope observation to detect any morphological changes.

2.6. Cell Viability

U87, A172, H4, U118, U373, and HEK-293 cell lines were seeded in 96-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well) 24 h before treatment. Each cell line was treated with a range of concentrations of each EO diluted in medium and with the vehicle control (DMSO), and further incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h. To assess cell viability, a modified Alamar blue assay was used [43]. Briefly, a solution of DMEM-HG medium with 10% (v/v) of resazurin salt dye stock solution (Sigma. St. Louis, MO, United States) at 0.1 mg/mL concentration was prepared, and subsequently added to each well after 24, 48, and 72 h. After 4 h of incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, the absorbance of the plate was measured at 570 and 600 nm in a BioTek reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Absorbance results were obtained by the Gen5 program. The cell viability was calculated according to the following equation:
Cell   viability   ( % ) = A 570 − A 600   of   treated   cells A 570 − A 600   of   control   cells
Furthermore, half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined using GraphPad Prism Software v.7.04 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) [11].

2.7. Cell Death Assay

The evaluation of cell death was accomplished using the Annexin V (AV)/propidium iodide (PI) assay by flow cytometry as previously described in [44]. Briefly, cells were treated with two different concentrations (0.7 or 0.8 µL/mL) of either M. cervina EO or L. pedunculata EO and further incubated for 24 h. After incubation, cells were stained with AV-APC and PI according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, United States). Cells were resuspended in 100 µL of binding buffer and further incubated with 5 µL of AV-APC solution and 2 µL of PI solution. Afterwards, cells were diluted in 400 µL of binding buffer. For data acquisition and treatment, as described by [45], a six-parameter, four-color FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) was used, and at least 10,000 events were collected using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). The results were analyzed with the Paint-a-Gate software and were expressed in percentages (%).

2.8. Cell Cycle Progression Assay

Analysis of cell cycle progression was assessed by flow cytometry using a PI/RNase solution (Immunostep, Salamanca, Spain), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were treated with two different concentrations (0.7 or 0.8 µL/mL) of either M. cervina EO or L. pedunculata EO and further incubated for 24 h. After incubation, cells were detached and fixed in 70% ethanol for 1 h at 4 °C. Then, cells were stained with 500 µL of PI/RNase solution. Results were acquired using CellQuest software and analyzed to calculate the percentage of the cell population in subG0/G1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M cell cycle phases.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

At least three independent biological experiments were performed, and results were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc multiple comparison test. A p-value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v7.04 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Essential Oils Composition

According to the performed chemical characterization, L. pedunculata EO (Table 1) was mainly characterized by a high percentage of oxygen-containing monoterpenes (73%), followed by monoterpene hydrocarbons (14.7%). The major identified compounds were camphor (39%), 1,8-cineole (10.9%) and α-pinene (6.9%). These results are in accordance with those formerly described. That is, Costa et al. [46] reported that the EO from Lavandula pedunculata subsp. lusitanica (Chaytor) Franco has camphor (40.6%) as a major constituent. Moreover, Zuzarte et al. [47] were paramount to elucidate the chemical polymorphism of Portuguese populations of L. pedunculata, highlighting the existence of two well-defined chemotypes regarding quantitative differences of 1,8-cineole and fenchone. In addition, the 1,8-cineole group was further subdivided into two other subtypes according to the percentages of camphor [47].
Given the narrow distribution of wild populations of M. cervina, there are only a few comprehensive reports regarding its EO chemical composition, as well as its pharmacological and bioactive properties [29,30,48,49,50]. According to our GC-MS analysis (Table 1), the EO of Hart’s Pennyroyal is fundamentally rich in pulegone (60%), followed by germacrene D (12%). This is in full agreement with previously reported data regarding pulegone percentage [29,30,48,49,50]. Pulegone-rich EOs usually present high toxicity, which makes them not so suitable for food industry or aromatherapy [29,50]. However, this does not discourage their interest for antitumor approaches.
Regarding the composition of T. mastichina EO (Table 1), oxygenated monoterpenes (74.7%) are the main group, followed by monoterpene hydrocarbons (19%). This EO has 1,8-cineole as main compound with 57%, followed by α-terpineol (7.2%) and fenchone (5.36%). Interestingly, in contrast to other thymes widely known for their intraspecific chemical variability [51], chemical characterization on T. mastichina EOs has demonstrated that the oxygenated monoterpene 1,8-cineole is the major compound [52,53,54,55,56].

3.2. Secretory Structures Morphology

EOs are generated and stored in specialized secretory structures each with different morphologies, functions, and distributions [10,25]. In this report, the abaxial leaf surface of the three Lamiaceae species under study was submitted to an analysis by SEM (Figure 1).
Firstly, regarding the acquired SEM micrographs of L. pedunculata, the presence of large glandular peltate and smaller glandular capitate trichomes, as well as a significant number of non-glandular trichomes, was observed (Figure 1B). These large multicellular peltate trichomes are constituted by several secretory cells arranged in a single circle. Interestingly, in other Lamiaceae plant species, a higher number of secretory cells in the peltate trichomes are arranged in two concentric circles, as reported in some Origanum species [59]. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that Zuzarte et al. [25] corroborate our observations, and that the ramified mixed trichomes found in L. pedunculata have not yet been described in other species [25].
Regarding the abaxial leaf surface of M. cervina, non-glandular trichomes and glandular trichomes were found (Figure 1D). On the other hand, large multicellular peltate trichomes formed by up to 13 secretory cells stand out from other smaller and globose trichomes that were also depicted. Similar observations were previously reported, but other trichome types were also observed when analyzing different organs of this same mint species [29].
On the other hand, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first insight into the trichomes of T. mastichina. In the present study, SEM micrographs obtained from T. mastichina leaves revealed numerous non-glandular trichomes with a warty surface and an acute apex, covering typically and large multicellular peltate glandular trichomes (Figure 1F). However, SEM analysis of Thymus lykae depicted both glandular peltate and capitate trichomes, as well as short and elongated unbranched non-glandular trichomes [59]. Thereby, we suggest that a more detailed anatomical and ultrastructural analysis may assist in additional findings regarding the secretory structures of the Iberian endemic T. mastichina.

3.3. Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Effect of Essential Oils

To establish the cytotoxic/antiproliferative profile of EOs from L. pedunculata, M. cervina, and T. mastichina, their effect was assessed on cell viability using Alamar blue assay. We used a panel of five glioblastoma cell lines (U87, A172, H4, U118, and U373 cells) and a non-tumor cell line (HEK-293 cells) that were treated either with different concentrations (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) of each EO or with DMSO (vehicle control).
Regarding L. pedunculata EO, despite its evident pronounced antiproliferative/cytotoxic effect against tumor cells (Figure 2), the probable tumor-specific mechanism that is observed for M. cervina EO (Figure 3) was not verified here. Moreover, analysis of the results showed that L. pedunculata EO, at the concentrations of 0.9 and 1.0 µL/mL, induced a significant decrease on the viability of HEK-293 cells (Figure 2).
Thus, as expected, after 24 h treatment, all the tested concentrations of L. pedunculata EO had a strong impact on the viability of tumor cells, inducing a significant decrease in the metabolic activity of GB cells (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001), being more visible for U118 cells (decreasing cell viability by 80–100%) (**** p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, after 48 h incubation, a slight increase of A172, U373, and U118 viability was observed, while for U87 and H4 cells the effect remained constant. Finally, after 72 h, the metabolic activity of GB cells did not undergo significant changes compared to the previous time-point, apart from the U87 cell line, where it increased for the lower concentrations (0.7, 0.6 µL/mL) (Figure 2). The IC50 values obtained were 0.6 µL/mL for U87, U118, and U373 cells, 0.7 µL/mL for A172 cells, and 0.8 µL/mL for H4 cells. We believe that these results are due to the content of camphor (39%) and 1,8-cineole (10.9%) already described for their therapeutic bioactivities.
There are other studies that sustain this structure–anticancer activity relationship. For example, the antiproliferative property of Salvia officinalis EO was tested against three human colon cancer cell lines (Caco-2, HT-29, and HCT-116), and the results revealed that this EO has an in vitro antiproliferative effect due to its composition rich in 1,8-cineole, camphor, and α-thujone [60]. Another example is the work of Lima et al. [61] that evaluated the anticancer activity of Ocimum kilimandscharicum Gürke EO on ten human cancer cell lines (U251, UACC-62, MCF-7, NCI-ADR/RES, 786-0, NCI-H460, PC-3, OVCAR-03, k-562, and HT-29). This in vitro cytotoxic screening demonstrated high selectivity and potent anticancer activity against the cell lines studied, particularly the OVCAR-3 cells. Based on its EO composition and the therapeutic activity observed, authors assumed that the presence of camphor and 1,8-cineole is responsible for the bioactivity verified [61]. Therefore, these studies corroborate our results with the chemical composition of L. pedunculata EO being rich in camphor and 1,8-cineole and, in turn, linked to a great cytotoxic/antiproliferative activity.
Treatment with M. cervina EO induced a strong antiproliferative/cytotoxic effect against all five GB cell lines (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cells), without significantly affecting the viability of non-tumor cells (HEK-293 cell line) (Figure 3). Particularly, at the 24 h time-point (after treatment with the M. cervina EO), tumor cells showed a significant (**** p < 0.0001) decrease in their metabolic activity for the higher concentrations tested (1.0, 0.9, 0.8 µL/mL) (Figure 3). Although, after 48 h treatment, an increase of the viability in tumoral cells was observed. The amelioration detected in the metabolic activity of GB cells may be related to the chemical nature of EOs and their physicochemical properties, such as volatility. Bearing this in mind, the results obtained for this time point are in accordance with what was expected. At 72 h post-incubation, the metabolic activity of A172, U373, and U118 cells suffer a slight decrease with the lower concentrations (0.7, 0.6 µL/mL), when compared to the previous time-point. For both U87 and H4 cells, even though a reduction in metabolic activity was observed, cell viability increased with some exceptions (0.6 and 1.0 µL/mL) (Figure 3). These data indicate that although M. cervina EO exhibited a pronounced antiproliferative/cytotoxic effect against GB cells, it did not affect non-tumor cells, which reveals a potential tumor-specific mechanism. Moreover, this EO’s half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) in tumor cells (A172, H4, U373, and U118 cells-0.7 µL/mL; U87 cells-0.8 µL/mL) was not cytotoxic for HEK-293 cells. These results were expected, since this EO has compounds with already described anticancer effects, such as pulegone, but with relatively low cytotoxicity in non-tumor cells. In a study where the antitumor activity of several EOs was evaluated against different cancer cells (MCF-7, HeLa, Jurkat, HT-29, and T24 cell lines), and one non-tumor cell line (HEK-293 cells), authors verified that EO from Origanum vulgare L. (O. vulgare) had a strong cytotoxic effect against cancer cells, but not against non-tumor cells. They concluded that this tumor-specific effect could be attributed to the high content of pulegone (77.45%) present in the O. vulgare EO [62]. This supports results obtained in this study (Figure 3). Rahimifard et al. [63] also explored the cytotoxic effect of Mentha pulegium L. (M. pulegium), a species with its EO enriched in pulegone, in cancer cells. Once more, it was stated that this EO induced a pronounced decrease in the viability of cancer cells [63]. In another study, the presence of a high percentage (58.5%) of pulegone in Micromeria fruticosa (L.) Druce subsp. serpyllifolia EO was also associated to improved antitumor activity [64].
At last, the cytotoxic profile of T. mastichina EO was also assessed against GB cell lines and non-tumor cells (Figure 4). As already observed for the previously analyzed EOs, right after 24 h treatment with T. mastichina EO, a significant (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001) impact on cell viability was observed, with a decrease in the metabolic activity of tumor cells (Figure 4). Although, it is worth mentioning that this EO, like that verified for M. cervina, did not significantly affect the viability of non-tumor cells (Figure 4). Once more, this tumor-specific profile is very interesting and worth exploring. Although, after 48 h and 72 h treatment, tumor cells seem to recover their proliferative activity (Figure 4). Furthermore, the IC50 values were 0.9 µL/mL for U87, H4, U118, and A172 cells and 0.8 µL/mL for U373 cells. Regarding this, the results obtained for T. mastichina EO are in accordance with data available in the literature. For example, Loizzo et al. [65] evaluated the cytotoxic activity of EOs from different plant species in amelanotic melanoma (C32), renal cell adenocarcinoma (ACHN), hormone-dependent prostate carcinoma (LNCaP) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines. Out of those plants, both Laurus nobilis L. (L. nobilis) and Salvia officinalis L. (S. officinalis) EOs were rich in 1,8-cineole (35.15% and 43.62%, respectively). Interestingly, EO obtained from L. nobilis fruit was the most active on the amelanotic melanoma cells and renal adenocarcinoma cells, while less activity was found when the EO from L. nobilis leaf was applied to both cell cultures. This difference in the cytotoxicity of the different EOs might be attributed to the different compositions of EOs obtained from different plant organs. Furthermore, S. officinalis EO exhibited its lowest IC50 values in renal cell adenocarcinoma. However, when authors tested the commercially available sample of the 1,8-cineole compound on several cancer cell lines, they surprisingly discovered that this monoterpene was inactive against the cell lines under study, which may hinder the importance of a synergistic activity of different compounds present in the EOs [65].
The referred association between the different major monoterpenes and the antitumor activity attributed to these EOs was considered in the development of this work. Therefore, after the treatment applied to GB cells, either with L. pedunculata EO, M. cervina EO or T. mastichina EO, a therapeutic effect was observed by the significant decrease in cell viability and proliferative capability of cancer cells, this effect being more significative with L. pedunculata and M. cervina EOs. Therefore, to better understand the mechanism of these EOs, further analysis to assess the cell death mechanism is of great interest.

3.4. Assessment of Cell Death Profile and Cell Cycle Progression of Essential Oils

According to the cell viability analysis, from the three species under study, L. pedunculata and M. cervina EOs presented higher cytotoxic/antiproliferative effects against GB cells, probably due to their chemical composition. Thereby, the next step was to further assess the mechanism by which these EOs induced the decrease of cell viability on a gold standard GB cell model (U87 cell line). Based on that, a cell death profile was made using AV/PI assay, which enables us to distinguish live cells from cells in apoptosis and from cells in necrosis.
AV-binding assay is one of the most used experiments to detect apoptosis, via the activation of caspases. In apoptotic stages, caspases cleave the lipid flippases in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, which exposes the phosphatidylserine (PS) to the outer leaflet layer of the cell membrane. Thus, at this stage, the PS is recognized by the AV (stoichiometric binding reaction), an indicative process of early apoptosis [45,66]. On the other hand, in late apoptosis and/or necrosis, the integrity of the plasma and nuclear membranes is greatly decreased, making it more permeable and therefore allowing for the passage of the PI fluorochrome. Once the PI passes through the membrane, it binds to the DNA and stains the nucleus. It is important to note, however, that this process only happens in cells whose membranes have become permeable (non-viable cells), and it cannot happen in live or in early apoptotic cells due to the presence of an intact plasma membrane [45,67,68]. Thus, by performing a double staining assay based on these two methods, it is possible to ascertain if cells are viable, apoptotic, or necrotic through alterations in plasma membrane integrity and permeability, since the transport of PS to the outer cell membrane allows for the penetration of the PI fluorochrome into the cell in a unidirectional manner.
The analysis of the results obtained showed that cells treated with both concentrations, 0.7 and 0.8 µL/mL, of either L. pedunculata or M. cervina EOs promoted a significant decrease in the % of live cells (Figure 5), which supports our previous results (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Moreover, treatment with both EOs led to a substantial increase of cells in late apoptosis/necrosis, which was accompanied by a significant increase in the % of cells in early apoptosis (Figure 5). However, 0.7 µL/mL of L. pedunculata EO was the exception to this pattern, with only a significant increase of cells in late apoptosis/necrosis (Figure 5). Once more, these data are in accordance with literature already reported for EOs with a similar chemical composition. As an example, Duymus et al. [69] reported the EO from Vitex agnus-castus L. fruit, enriched in 1,8-cineole, showed high apoptotic activity against both A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma cells) and MCF-7 cells [69]. Another work stated that treatment with Ziziphora tenuior L. EO (with a high content in pulegone) on colorectal cancer epithelial cells (HT-29) revealed a time-dependent apoptosis mechanism [70]. It is worth mentioning that the reason for these apoptotic events in these studies seems to be due to the rich content in camphor and pulegone from L. pedunculata and M. cervina, respectively. Considering these results (Figure 5), the most probable mechanism for both EOs is via inducing cell death by apoptosis due to the substantial increase of cells in late and early apoptosis. Nevertheless, an analysis of the impact of these EOs on cell cycle could help to sustain our preliminary conclusions.
The impact of L. pedunculata and M. cervina EOs on cell cycle progression was evaluated using PI/RNase assay by flow cytometry. As described in the previous assay, U87 cells were treated with 0.7 and 0.8 µL/mL of either L. pedunculata or M. cervina EOs. Vehicle (DMSO) and untreated cells were considered the control groups (Figure 6).
When treating the U87 cells with M. cervina EO, results obtained are very similar to the ones described by the effect of L. pedunculata EO. Treatment with 0.8 µL/mL of both EOs promoted an increasing percentage of cells in subG0/G1 (Figure 6), meaning an increase of cells in early apoptosis. This could explain why the increasing % of cells observed in late apoptosis/necrosis (Figure 5) undergo cell death by apoptosis. Furthermore, it was also observed a block of cells in S and G2/M phases for this higher concentration. Interestingly, for the lower concentration (0.7 µL/mL), this profile was not verified. In fact, it seems that with this concentration both EOs have the main impact on block G2/M phase (Figure 6).
Thus, these data allowed to conclude that both EOs have a dose-dependent effect, and the most likely mechanism is inducing cell death by apoptosis through DNA damage and downregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase1 (cdk1)/cyclin B1 complex with an enhancement of p21 expression [11,71].

4. Conclusions

In this study, important insights on L. pedunculata, M. cervina and T. mastichina EOs were provided, thus paving the way for the design of innovative and alternative antitumor drugs. Overall, from the three plants under study, the EOs from both L. pedunculata and M. cervina stand out with stronger cytotoxic activity against GB cells, a bioactive profile probably associated with their rich composition in pulegone and camphor, respectively. Furthermore, both EOs presented a dose-dependent antitumor effect, inducing cell death by apoptosis. Despite achieved results, further studies will be performed to better understand the antitumor mechanism of action. It is however clear that this is a very interesting finding focusing on natural compounds’ contribution in drug discovery for glioblastoma treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C. and M.M.; methodology—plant material, M.P.M., C.V. and C.C.; methodology—chemical characterization, M.I.D., J.S.A. and L.B.; methodology—scanning electron microscopy, M.Z.; methodology—in vitro studies, M.P.M. and M.M.; methodology—flow cytometry, A.C.G. and M.M., data analysis—in vitro studies, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, B.G.N., M.P.M. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, C.C., C.V.; supervision, C.C.; funding acquisition, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal), through the following projects: UIDB/04539/2020, UIDP/04539/2020, and LA/P/0058/2020 (CIBB) Strategic Projects; and COA/BRB/0019/2019 (CoaMedPlants). M.M. is supported by Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) with a PhD grant (Reference: SFRH/BD/146441/2019). This PhD grant is financed by national budget and co-financed through the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Regional Operational Por_Centro. M.P.M. is supported by Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) with a PhD grant (Reference: PRT/BD/153391/2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Waqar, M.; Trifiletti, D.M.; McBain, C.; O’Connor, J.; Coope, D.J.; Akkari, L.; Quinones-Hinojosa, A.; Borst, G.R. Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2022, 24, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Domínguez-Martín, E.M.; Magalhães, M.; Díaz-Lanza, A.M.; Marques, M.P.; Princiotto, S.; Gómez, A.M.; Efferth, T.; Cabral, C.; Rijo, P. Phytochemical Study and Antiglioblastoma Activity Assessment of Plectranthus hadiensis (Forssk.) Schweinf. Ex Sprenger Var. Hadiensis Stems. Molecules 2022, 27, 3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rong, L.; Li, N.; Zhang, Z. Emerging Therapies for Glioblastoma: Current State and Future Directions. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fernandes, C.; Costa, A.; Osório, L.; Lago, R.C.; Linhares, P.; Carvalho, B.; Caeiro, C. Current Standards of Care in Glioblastoma Therapy. In Glioblastoma; Exon Publications: Brisbane, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. le Rhun, E.; Preusser, M.; Roth, P.; Reardon, D.A.; van den Bent, M.; Wen, P.; Reifenberger, G.; Weller, M. Molecular Targeted Therapy of Glioblastoma. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2019, 80, 101896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wen, P.Y.; Packer, R.J. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: Clinical Implications. Neuro Oncol. 2021, 23, 1215–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Magalhães, M.; Manadas, B.; Efferth, T.; Cabral, C. Chemoprevention and Therapeutic Role of Essential Oils and Phenolic Compounds: Modeling Tumor Microenvironment in Glioblastoma. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 169, 105638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blowman, K.; Magalhães, M.; Lemos, M.F.L.; Cabral, C.; Pires, I.M. Anticancer Properties of Essential Oils and Other Natural Products. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 2018, 3149362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. de Mesquita, L.S.S.; Luz, T.R.S.A.; Mesquita, J.W.C.d.; Coutinho, D.F.; Amaral, F.M.M.d.; Ribeiro, M.N.d.S.; Malik, S. Exploring the Anticancer Properties of Essential Oils from Family Lamiaceae. Food Rev. Int. 2019, 35, 105–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beeby, E.; Magalhães, M.; Lemos, M.F.L.; Pires, I.M.; Cabral, C. Cytotoxic Effects of Ridolfia segetum (L.) Moris Phytoproducts in Cancer Cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 267, 113515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beeby, E.; Magalhães, M.; Poças, J.; Collins, T.; Lemos, M.F.L.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Cabral, C.; Pires, I.M. Secondary Metabolites (Essential Oils) from Sand-Dune Plants Induce Cytotoxic Effects in Cancer Cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 258, 112803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Howes, M.-J.R. The Evolution of Anticancer Drug Discovery from Plants. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 293–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Negre-Zakharov, F.; Long, M.C.; Dudareva, N. Floral Scents and Fruit Aromas Inspired by Nature. In Plant-derived Natural Products: Synthesis, Function, and Application; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dhifi, W.; Bellili, S.; Jazi, S.; Bahloul, N.; Mnif, W. Essential Oils’ Chemical Characterization and Investigation of Some Biological Activities: A Critical Review. Medicines 2016, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Russo, R.; Corasaniti, M.T.; Bagetta, G.; Morrone, L.A. Exploitation of Cytotoxicity of Some Essential Oils for Translation in Cancer Therapy. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 397821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Viktorová, J.; Stupák, M.; Řehořová, K.; Dobiasová, S.; Hoang, L.; Hajšlová, J.; van Thanh, T.; van Tri, L.; van Tuan, N.; Ruml, T. Lemon Grass Essential Oil Does Not Modulate Cancer Cells Multidrug Resistance by Citral—Its Dominant and Strongly Antimicrobial Compound. Foods 2020, 9, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zeng, C.; Fan, D.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Yuan, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Lu, J.; Zhang, C.; Han, J.; et al. Curcumol Enhances the Sensitivity of Doxorubicin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer via Regulating the MiR-181b-2-3p-ABCC3 Axis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 174, 113795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wu, M.; Li, T.; Chen, L.; Peng, S.; Liao, W.; Bai, R.; Zhao, X.; Yang, H.; Wu, C.; Zeng, H.; et al. Essential Oils from Inula Japonica and Angelicae Dahuricae Enhance Sensitivity of MCF-7/ADR Breast Cancer Cells to Doxorubicin via Multiple Mechanisms. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 180, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Y.; Shen, J.; Xia, L.; Wang, Y. Curcuma Zedoaria (Berg.) Rosc. Essential Oil and Paclitaxel Synergistically Enhance the Apoptosis of SKOV3 Cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 1253–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ambrož, M.; Matoušková, P.; Skarka, A.; Zajdlová, M.; Žáková, K.; Skálová, L. The Effects of Selected Sesquiterpenes from Myrica Rubra Essential Oil on the Efficacy of Doxorubicin in Sensitive and Resistant Cancer Cell Lines. Molecules 2017, 22, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zare, E.; Jamali, T.; Ardestani, S.K.; Kavoosi, G. Synergistic Effect of Zataria Multiflora Essential Oil on Doxorubicin-Induced Growth Inhibition of PC3 Cancer Cells and Apoptosis. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2021, 42, 101286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lampronti, I.; Saab, A.M.; Gambari, R. Antiproliferative Activity of Essential Oils Derived from Plants Belonging to the Magnoliophyta Division. Int. J. Oncol. 2006, 29, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pudziuvelyte, L.; Stankevicius, M.; Maruska, A.; Petrikaite, V.; Ragazinskiene, O.; Draksiene, G.; Bernatoniene, J. Chemical Composition and Anticancer Activity of Elsholtzia Ciliata Essential Oils and Extracts Prepared by Different Methods. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 107, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zuzarte, M.R.; Dinis, A.M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.R.; Canhoto, J.M. Trichomes, Essential Oils and in Vitro Propagation of Lavandula Pedunculata (Lamiaceae). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lopes, C.L.; Pereira, E.; Soković, M.; Carvalho, A.M.; Barata, A.M.; Lopes, V.; Rocha, F.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic Composition and Bioactivity of Lavandula pedunculata (Mill.) Cav. Samples from Different Geographical Origin. Molecules 2018, 23, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Neves, J.M.; Matos, C.; Moutinho, C.; Queiroz, G.; Gomes, L.R. Ethnopharmacological Notes about Ancient Uses of Medicinal Plants in Trás-Os-Montes (Northern of Portugal). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miguel, M.; Barros, L.; Pereira, C.; Calhelha, R.C.; Garcia, P.A.; Castro, M.Á.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical Characterization and Bioactive Properties of Two Aromatic Plants: Calendula officinalis L. (Flowers) and Mentha cervina L. (Leaves). Food Funct. 2016, 7, 2223–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rodrigues, L.; Monteiro, P.; Póvoa, O.; Teixeira, G.; Moldão, M.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Monteiro, A. Morphology of Secretory Structures and Essential Oil Composition in Mentha cervina L. from Portugal. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodrigues, L.; Duarte, A.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Brito, L.; Teixeira, G.; Moldão, M.; Monteiro, A. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oils from the Medicinal Plant Mentha cervina L. Grown in Portugal. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 21, 3485–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barros, L.; Heleno, S.A.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Lamiaceae Often Used in Portuguese Folk Medicine as a Source of Powerful Antioxidants: Vitamins and Phenolics. LWT 2010, 43, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Méndez-Tovar, I.; Sponza, S.; Asensio-S-Manzanera, M.C.; Novak, J. Contribution of the Main Polyphenols of Thymus mastichina subsp. mastichina to Its Antioxidant Properties. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 66, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodrigues, M.; Lopes, A.C.; Vaz, F.; Filipe, M.; Alves, G.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Coutinho, P.; Araujo, A.R.T.S. Thymus mastichina: Composition and Biological Properties with a Focus on Antimicrobial Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Méndez-Tovar, I.; Martín, H.; Santiago, Y.; Ibeas, A.; Herrero, B.; Asensio-S.-Manzanera, M.C. Variation in Morphological Traits among Thymus mastichina (L.) L. Populations. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2015, 62, 1257–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arantes, S.M.; Piçarra, A.; Guerreiro, M.; Salvador, C.; Candeias, F.; Caldeira, A.T.; Martins, M.R. Toxicological and Pharmacological Properties of Essential Oils of Calamintha nepeta, Origanum virens and Thymus mastichina of Alentejo (Portugal). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 133, 110747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Taghouti, M.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Schäfer, J.; Santos, J.A.; Bunzel, M.; Nunes, F.M.; Silva, A.M. Chemical Characterization and Bioactivity of Extracts from Thymus mastichina: A Thymus with a Distinct Salvianolic Acid Composition. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Albano, S.M.; Miguel, M.G. Biological Activities of Extracts of Plants Grown in Portugal. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2011, 33, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gordo, J.; Máximo, P.; Cabrita, E.; Lourenço, A.; Oliva, A.; Almeida, J.; Filipe, M.; Cruz, P.; Barcia, R.; Santos, M.; et al. Thymus mastichina: Chemical Constituents and Their Anti-Cancer Activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 1491–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Leal, F.; Coelho, A.C.; Soriano, T.; Alves, C.; Matos, M. Fungicide Activity of Thymus mastichina and Mentha rotundifolia in Plants in Vitro. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 9th ed.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Spréa, R.M.; Fernandes, Â.; Calhelha, R.C.; Pereira, C.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Alves, M.J.; Canan, C.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical and Bioactive Characterization of the Aromatic Plant: Levisticum Officinale W.D.J. Koch: A Comprehensive Study. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marques, M.P.; Martin, D.; Bosch, M.; Martins, J.; Biswal, A.; Zuzarte, M.; de Carvalho, L.B.; Canhoto, J.; da Costa, R. Unveiling the Compositional Remodelling of Arbutus unedo L. Fruits during Ripening. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 303, 111248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Magalhães, M.; Farinha, D.; de Lima, M.C.P.; Faneca, H. Increased Gene Delivery Efficiency and Specificity of a Lipid-Based Nanosystem Incorporating a Glycolipid. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 4979–4989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Magalhães, M.; Jorge, J.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Sarmento-Ribeiro, A.B.; Carvalho, R.; Figueiras, A.; Santos, A.C.; Veiga, F. MiR-29b and Retinoic Acid Co-Delivery: A Promising Tool to Induce a Synergistic Antitumoral Effect in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2020, 10, 1367–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Magalhães, M.; Almeida, M.; Tavares-da-Silva, E.; Roleira, F.M.F.; Varela, C.; Jorge, J.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Carvalho, R.A.; Veiga, F.; Santos, A.C.; et al. MiR-145-Loaded Micelleplexes as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Inhibit Proliferation and Migration of Osteosarcoma Cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 123, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Costa, P.; Gonçalves, S.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Almeida, C.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Romano, A. Metabolic Profile and Biological Activities of Lavandula pedunculata Subsp. lusitanica (Chaytor) Franco: Studies on the Essential Oil and Polar Extracts. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2501–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zuzarte, M.; Gonåalves, M.J.; Cavaleiro, C.; Dinis, A.M.; Canhoto, J.M.; Salgueiro, L.R. Chemical Composition and Antifungal Activity of the Essential Oils of Lavandula pedunculata (Miller) Cav. Chem. Biodivers. 2009, 6, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Politi, M.; Rodrigues, C.L.; Gião, M.S.; Pintado, M.E.; Castro, P.M.L. Antioxidant Principles and Volatile Constituents from the North-Western Iberian Mint “Erva-Peixeira”, Mentha cervina. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 2065–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Helal, I.M.; El-Bessoumy, A.; Al-Bataineh, E.; Joseph, M.R.P.; Rajagopalan, P.; Chandramoorthy, H.C.; ben Hadj Ahmed, S. Antimicrobial Efficiency of Essential Oils from Traditional Medicinal Plants of Asir Region, Saudi Arabia, over Drug Resistant Isolates. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8928306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Gonçalves, M.J.; Vicente, A.M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L. Composition and Antifungal Acticvity of the Essential Oil of Mentha cervia from Portugal. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 21, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Salehi, B.; Abu-Darwish, M.S.; Tarawneh, A.H.; Cabral, C.; Gadetskaya, A.V.; Salgueiro, L.; Hosseinabadi, T.; Rajabi, S.; Chanda, W.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; et al. Thymus spp. Plants-Food Applications and Phytopharmacy Properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 85, 287–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salgueiro, L.R.; Vila, R.; Tomàs, X.; Cañigueral, S.; da Cunha, A.P.; Adzet, T. Composition and Variability of the Essential Oils of Thymus Species from Section Mastichina from Portugal. Syst. Ecol. 1997, 25, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Faleiro, M.L.; Miguel, M.G.; Ladeiro, F.; Venâncio, F.; Tavares, R.; Brito, J.C.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils Isolated from Portuguese Endemic Species of Thymus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Miguel, G.; Simões, M.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Carvalho, L. Composition and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils of Thymus caespititius, Thymus camphoratus and Thymus mastichina. Food Chem. 2004, 86, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Araujo, A.R.T.S.; Périno, S.; Fernandez, X.; Cunha, C.; Rodrigues, M.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Jordao, L.; Silva, L.A.; Rodilla, J.; Coutinho, P.; et al. Solvent-free Microwave Extraction of Thymus mastichina Essential Oil: Influence on Their Chemical Composition and on the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cutillas, A.B.; Carrasco, A.; Martinez-Gutierrez, R.; Tomas, V.; Tudela, J. Thymus mastichina L. Essential Oils from Murcia (Spain): Composition and Antioxidant, Antienzymatic and Antimicrobial Bioactivities. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy, 5th ed.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. John Wiley & Sons NIST 05 Mass Spectral Library, 8th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006.
  59. Bosabalidis, A.M.; Tsekos, I. Glandular Hair Formation in Origanum Species. Ann. Bot. 1984, 53, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Luca, T.; Napoli, E.; Privitera, G.; Musso, N.; Ruberto, G.; Castorina, S. Antiproliferative Effect and Cell Cycle Alterations Induced by Salvia Officinalis Essential Oil and Its Three Main Components in Human Colon Cancer Cell Lines. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. de Lima, V.T.; Vieira, M.C.; Kassuya, C.A.L.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Alves, J.M.; Foglio, M.A.; de Carvalho, J.E.; Formagio, A.S.N. Chemical Composition and Free Radical-Scavenging, Anticancer and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of the Essential Oil from Ocimum Kilimandscharicum. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 1298–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Elansary, H.O.; Abdelgaleil, S.A.M.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Yessoufou, K.; Elhindi, K.; El-Hendawy, S. Effective Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities of Essential Oils of Horticultural Aromatic Crops in Northern Egypt. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rahimifard, N.; Hajimehdipoor, H.; Hedayati, M.H.; Bagheri, O.; Pishehvar, H.; Ajani, Y. Cytotoxic Effects of Essential Oils and Extracts of Some Mentha Species on Vero, Hela and Hep2 Cell Lines. J. Med. Plants 2010, 9, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  64. Shehab, N.G.; Abu-Gharbieh, E. Constituents and Biological Activity of the Essential Oil and the Aqueous Extract of Micromeria fruticosa (L.) Druce Subsp. Serpyllifolia. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 687–692. [Google Scholar]
  65. Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; Menichini, F.; Saab, A.M.; Statti, G.A.; Menichini, F. Cytotoxic Activity of Essential Oils from Labiatae and Lauraceae Families against in Vitro Human Tumor Models. Anticancer. Res. 2007, 27, 3293–3299. [Google Scholar]
  66. Gelles, J.D.; Edward Chipuk, J. Robust High-Throughput Kinetic Analysis of Apoptosis with Real-Time High-Content Live-Cell Imaging. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rieger, A.M.; Nelson, K.L.; Konowalchuk, J.D.; Barreda, D.R. Modified Annexin V/Propidium Iodide Apoptosis Assay for Accurate Assessment of Cell Death. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, e2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Taruvai Kalyana Kumar, R.; Liu, S.; Minna, J.D.; Prasad, S. Monitoring Drug Induced Apoptosis and Treatment Sensitivity in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Using Dielectrophoresis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2016, 1860, 1877–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Duymuş, H.G.; Çiftçi, G.A.; Yildirim, Ş.U.; Demirci, B.; Kirimer, N. The Cytotoxic Activity of Vitex agnus castus L. Essential Oils and Their Biochemical Mechanisms. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 55, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Azimi, M.; Mehrzad, J.; Ahmadi, A.; Ahmadi, E.; Ghorbani Ranjbary, A. Apoptosis Induced by Ziziphora Tenuior Essential Oil in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 5522964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Magalhães, M.; Domínguez-Martín, E.M.; Jorge, J.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Díaz-Lanza, A.M.; Manadas, B.; Efferth, T.; Rijo, P.; Cabral, C. Parvifloron D-Based Potential Therapy for Glioblastoma: Inducing Apoptosis via the Mitochondria Dependent Pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1006832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g001 550
Figure 1. Photographic records of Côa Valley Lamiaceae species in flowering stage and respective scanning electron micrographs captured from their abaxial leaf surfaces, as follows: L. pedunculata (A,B), M. cervina (C,D), and T. mastichina (E,F). Note: cgt—capitate glandular trichomes; ngt—non-glandular trichomes; and pgt—peltate glandular trichomes.
Figure 1. Photographic records of Côa Valley Lamiaceae species in flowering stage and respective scanning electron micrographs captured from their abaxial leaf surfaces, as follows: L. pedunculata (A,B), M. cervina (C,D), and T. mastichina (E,F). Note: cgt—capitate glandular trichomes; ngt—non-glandular trichomes; and pgt—peltate glandular trichomes.
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g001
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g002 550
Figure 2. Cytotoxic effect of L. pedunculata EO against GB cells (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cell lines) and non-tumoral cells (HEK-293 cell line). Cells were treated either with L. pedunculata EO (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) or with the vehicle control (DMSO) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability (metabolic activity) was expressed as percentage of control (untreated cells). Results were presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 2. Cytotoxic effect of L. pedunculata EO against GB cells (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cell lines) and non-tumoral cells (HEK-293 cell line). Cells were treated either with L. pedunculata EO (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) or with the vehicle control (DMSO) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability (metabolic activity) was expressed as percentage of control (untreated cells). Results were presented as mean ± SD.
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g002
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g003 550
Figure 3. Cytotoxic effect of M. cervina EO against GB cells (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cell lines) and non-tumoral cells (HEK-293 cell line). Cells were treated either with M. cervina EO (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) or with the vehicle control (DMSO) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability (metabolic activity) was expressed as percentage of control (untreated cells). Results were presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 3. Cytotoxic effect of M. cervina EO against GB cells (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cell lines) and non-tumoral cells (HEK-293 cell line). Cells were treated either with M. cervina EO (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) or with the vehicle control (DMSO) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability (metabolic activity) was expressed as percentage of control (untreated cells). Results were presented as mean ± SD.
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g003
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g004 550
Figure 4. Cytotoxic effect of T. mastichina EO against GB cells (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cell lines) and non-tumoral cells (HEK-293 cell line). Cells were treated either with T. mastichina EO (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) or with the vehicle control (DMSO) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability (metabolic activity) was expressed as percentage of control (untreated cells). Results were presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 4. Cytotoxic effect of T. mastichina EO against GB cells (A172, U87, H4, U373, and U118 cell lines) and non-tumoral cells (HEK-293 cell line). Cells were treated either with T. mastichina EO (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.6 µL/mL) or with the vehicle control (DMSO) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability (metabolic activity) was expressed as percentage of control (untreated cells). Results were presented as mean ± SD.
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g004
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g005 550
Figure 5. Assessment of cell death profile in U87 cell line by flow cytometry. Cells were treated either with L. pedunculata EO and M. cervina EO or with the vehicle control (DMSO), and further incubated for 24 h. After incubation, cells were co-stained with Annexin V and PI and the percentage of cells in apoptosis and non-apoptotic cells was determined. Asterisks (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001) represent the values that significantly differ from the control (untreated cells). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 5. Assessment of cell death profile in U87 cell line by flow cytometry. Cells were treated either with L. pedunculata EO and M. cervina EO or with the vehicle control (DMSO), and further incubated for 24 h. After incubation, cells were co-stained with Annexin V and PI and the percentage of cells in apoptosis and non-apoptotic cells was determined. Asterisks (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001) represent the values that significantly differ from the control (untreated cells). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g005
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g006 550
Figure 6. Analysis of cell cycle progression in U87 cell line. Cells were treated either with L. pedunculata EO and M. cervina EO or with the vehicle control (DMSO), and further incubated for 24 h. Cells were stained with PI/RNase solution and cell cycle analysis was assessed by flow cytometry. Proportion of cells in subG0/G1, G0/G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases was expressed in percentage of total cell population. Asterisks (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001) represent the values that significantly differ from the control (untreated cells). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 6. Analysis of cell cycle progression in U87 cell line. Cells were treated either with L. pedunculata EO and M. cervina EO or with the vehicle control (DMSO), and further incubated for 24 h. Cells were stained with PI/RNase solution and cell cycle analysis was assessed by flow cytometry. Proportion of cells in subG0/G1, G0/G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases was expressed in percentage of total cell population. Asterisks (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001) represent the values that significantly differ from the control (untreated cells). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Pharmaceutics 15 00341 g006
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of L. pedunculata, M. cervina, and T. mastichina OEs from Côa Valley, Northeastern Portugal.
Table 1. Chemical composition of L. pedunculata, M. cervina, and T. mastichina OEs from Côa Valley, Northeastern Portugal.
CompoundRTLRI aLRI bLP cMC dTM e
Tricyclene13.299149210.39-0.06
α-Thujene13.61920924--0.18
α-Pinene13.919259326.90.664.1
Camphene14.659409464.00-1.4
2,4(10)-Thujadiene14.979469530.357--
Sabinene15.999659690.0220.453.2
β-Pinene16.129689740.1071.1395.2
2,3-Dehydro-1,8-cineole16.88983988--0.34
β-Myrcene16.98984988-0.21.1
Δ3-Carene17.89100210081.21--
4-Carene18.2410091018 *0.0480.850.27
p-Cymene18.52101410200.28--
o-Cymene18.66101710220.530.360.61
Limonene18.8101910250.531.46-
1,8-Cineole19.031024102610.9-57.00
cis-β-Ocimene19.41103110320.180.1610.18
trans-β-Ocimene19.9310411044--1.7
γ-Terpinene20.44105110530.0921.60.61
cis-Sabinene hydrate20.8610591065-3.40.54
cis-Linalool oxide21.14106510670.68-0.68
Camphenilone21.65107410780.45-0.45
Fenchone 21.9107910835.36-5.36
p-Mentha-2,4(8)-diene21.9710811085-0.40.41
trans-Sabinene hydrate22.4510901096 *-0.280.28
Linalool 22.56109110951.90.181.29
Fenchol 23.25110511140.072-0.072
cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 23.6211131120 *-0.230.144
α-Campholenal-(+)2-pinen-7-one23.8511181122 + 11240.62-0.62
trans-Pinocarveol24.50113111350.19-0.17
trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 24.5511321139 *-0.24-
Camphor24.731135114139.00-1.2
Menthone25.2411461148-0.12-
Pinocarvone 25.66115411600.12-0.102
Menthofuran 25.7411561159-0.19-
endo-Borneol 25.88115911652.4-4.8
Isopulegone 26.331168--2.55-
Terpinen-4-ol26.41116911740.665.71.8
m-Cymen-8-ol26.64117411760.6--
p-Cymen-8-ol26.79117711791.1--
α-Terpineol27.07118211860.690.57.2
Myrtenal 27.32118811950.37-0.43
Verbenone27.93120012041.2--
Pulegone 29.4512301233-60.00-
Linalool acetate30.17124812540.25--
Bornyl acetate31.59127812845.9-0.07
Lavandulyl acetate31.8128212880.28-0.28
α-Terpinyl acetate 34.4513411346--0.19
β-Elemene 36.3513851389-0.18-
β-Caryophyllene37.5614121417-1.20.5
Alloaromadendrene 39.3114551458-0.2180.11
Cadina-3,5-diene 39.381456-0.07--
Germacrene D 40.13147414770.2212.00-
β-Selinene 40.36148014890.05--
1,11-Oxidocalamenene40.5114831490 *0.42--
Bicyclogermacrene 40.7714901500-1.30.26
γ-Cadinene41.46150715130.12--
δ-Cadinene41.81151615220.380.6-
Elemol 42.8415411548--0.9
Globulol 44.5715851590-2.001.5
Ledol 45.0215971602--0.22
1,10-Di-epi-cubenol45.43160916180.37--
γ-Eudesmol 46.0716251630-0.30.24
Monoterpene hydrocarbons14.710.919,00
Oxygen-containing monoterpenes73.0070.0074.7
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons0.815.000.9
Oxygen-containing sesquiterpenes7.32.72.8
Total identified 95.8098.6097.40
a LRI: linear retention index determined on a SH-RXi-5 ms fused silica column (Shimadzu) relative to a series of n-alkanes (C8–C40); b LRI: linear retention index reported in the literature [57] or * retrieved from NIST database [58]; c,d,e Abbreviations: LP-Lavandula pedunculata, MC-Mentha cervina, and TM-Thymus mastichina.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marques, M.P.; Neves, B.G.; Varela, C.; Zuzarte, M.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Dias, M.I.; Amaral, J.S.; Barros, L.; Magalhães, M.; Cabral, C. Essential Oils from Côa Valley Lamiaceae Species: Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Effect on Glioblastoma Cells. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020341

AMA Style

Marques MP, Neves BG, Varela C, Zuzarte M, Gonçalves AC, Dias MI, Amaral JS, Barros L, Magalhães M, Cabral C. Essential Oils from Côa Valley Lamiaceae Species: Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Effect on Glioblastoma Cells. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(2):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marques, Mário Pedro, Beatriz Guapo Neves, Carla Varela, Mónica Zuzarte, Ana Cristina Gonçalves, Maria Inês Dias, Joana S. Amaral, Lillian Barros, Mariana Magalhães, and Célia Cabral. 2023. "Essential Oils from Côa Valley Lamiaceae Species: Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Effect on Glioblastoma Cells" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 2: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020341

APA Style

Marques, M. P., Neves, B. G., Varela, C., Zuzarte, M., Gonçalves, A. C., Dias, M. I., Amaral, J. S., Barros, L., Magalhães, M., & Cabral, C. (2023). Essential Oils from Côa Valley Lamiaceae Species: Cytotoxicity and Antiproliferative Effect on Glioblastoma Cells. Pharmaceutics, 15(2), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop