Next Article in Journal
Harnessing the Power of Onco-Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Evolution of Bovine Foamy Virus Variants with Enhanced Cell-Free Virus Titers and Transmission
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 7
Issue 11
10.3390/v7112912
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Psoralen Inactivation of Viruses: A Process for the Safe Manipulation of Viral Antigen and Nucleic Acid

by
Katherine Schneider
1,†,
Loni Wronka-Edwards
1,
Melissa Leggett-Embrey
1,
Eric Walker
1,
Peifang Sun
2,
Brian Ondov
1,
Travis H. Wyman
1,
MJ Rosovitz
1,
Sherry S. Bohn
3,
James Burans
1 and
Tadeusz Kochel
1,*,†
1
National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC), Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA
2
Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
3
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2015, 7(11), 5875-5888; https://doi.org/10.3390/v7112912
Submission received: 22 September 2015 / Revised: 3 November 2015 / Accepted: 4 November 2015 / Published: 12 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Immunology, Vaccines, and Antivirals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High consequence human pathogenic viruses must be handled at biosafety level 2, 3 or 4 and must be rendered non-infectious before they can be utilized for molecular or immunological applications at lower biosafety levels. Here we evaluate psoralen-inactivated Arena-, Bunya-, Corona-, Filo-, Flavi- and Orthomyxoviruses for their suitability as antigen in immunological processes and as template for reverse transcription PCR and sequencing. The method of virus inactivation using a psoralen molecule appears to have broad applicability to RNA viruses and to leave both the particle and RNA of the treated virus intact, while rendering the virus non-infectious.

1. Introduction

One of the challenges facing researchers in biocontainment laboratories is that all materials moved from a higher level of biocontainment to a lower biocontainment level (Biosafety Level, BSL) must be proven to be sterile, or undergo a valid and verified method of agent inactivation. This involves inoculating a portion of the material or biological agent containing the sample to be moved to a medium capable of supporting growth of the target organism and evaluating for the presence of agent after sufficient incubation time has passed to allow any viable organisms present to amplify to a detectable level (i.e., colonies on a plate, turbidity in broth). The media and assays used to detect viable organisms will vary depending on the target agents. For human pathogenic viruses, sterility testing is an involved process that begins with inoculation of a portion of the sample of interest into a permissive cell culture line. Depending on the sample, which may contain materials toxic to the cell culture line or require an extended incubation to ensure detectable quantities of virus are present, additional rounds of cell culture amplification may be employed. Once sufficient time has passed to allow amplification of surviving virus, a detection assay such as a plaque assay, immunomicrotitration, or immunofluorescence is performed. The detection of viable agent indicates the process of inactivation was insufficient, and the sample may not be moved to a lower biocontainment area.
Sterility testing takes time (in excess of three weeks, depending on the virus), and researchers have sought inactivation methods that can be validated to support a reduced time before a sample can be moved to a lower biocontainment level. In this sense, inactivation refers to the use of a tested and validated method known to sufficiently and repeatedly render a sample sterile. Materials inactivated using a well-documented and validated inactivation procedure may be moved to a lower biocontainment level, transported, and disposed of without a sterility test. An example of a widely accepted inactivation method is autoclaving; with the process performed correctly and the equipment maintained and operating within normal parameters, and with suitable verification of a full, effective cycle such as biological indicators or machine read-outs, the material subjected to the process is considered sterile. Sterility tests are not performed on every sample that undergoes autoclaving as a method of disposal.
Various formulations of formaldehyde have been widely utilized for the inactivation of virus preparations [1,2,3,4]. However, like autoclaving, this method renders the samples unusable for molecular, genomic and/or immunological methods [5,6,7].
Another widely accepted method of agent inactivation is the use of reagents containing phenol and a chaotropic salt (guanidine isothiocyanate or guanidine thiocyanate, commercially available as TRIzol LS or TriPure reagent, respectively) for the inactivation of viral samples [8,9]. The use of TRIzol LS for the inactivation of viral agents has been a standard accepted method for a number of institutions for decades. However, actual sterility testing data supporting this position are difficult to obtain and complicated to interpret, mainly due to the toxic nature of the TRIzol LS/TriPure reagents to cell culture lines.
TRIzol LS is comprised of phenol, an extremely caustic organic solvent, and guanidine isothiocyanate, a chaotropic salt that denatures macromolecules such as DNA, RNA and proteins. Conventional methods to confirm sterility begin with placing a portion of the inactivated sample on a cell culture layer to provide an opportunity for any surviving virus to infect and grow in sufficient quantity to be detectable by observation of cytopathic effects (CPE) or other detection methods. The toxicity of the TRIzol LS in undiluted, treated viral samples causes almost immediate death of the cell culture layer used for sterility testing. Previous studies have diluted the TRIzol LS-inactivated samples 100- and 1000-fold and still observed tissue culture cell death [9]. While the sterility tests in these studies were negative for the presence of viral agents, it must be noted that the tests could only be performed on treated samples that were diluted many thousand fold and were no longer toxic to the tissue culture cells, so the possibility remains in such scenarios that the presence of small numbers of surviving virus would elude detection.
Attempts have been made to remove TRIzol LS prior to sterility testing. Methods such as dialysis and spin column filtration were investigated, but again the caustic nature of the reagent was problematic. Dialysis material is rated only for very small percentages of phenol (well below the concentration present in TRIzol LS-inactivated samples), and membrane filters were not resistant to phenol. Nevertheless, there is wide acceptance of the TRIzol LS method as a biocontainment laboratory standard for the inactivation of viruses based on historical data, precedent, and the known mechanism of action of the inactivating agent.
Investigation into the properties of psoralens led to the realization that this group of compounds might provide a method for inactivating viral agents while preserving structures needed for antigenic activity and nucleic acids for molecular or genomic analysis. Psoralens are small, photoreactive compounds that freely penetrate phospholipid bilayers and intercalate between nucleic acid pyrimidine residues, causing cross-linking and inactivation via inhibition of replication following exposure to UV-A radiation. Psoralens do not appear to interact with proteins and inactivation of viruses with psoralen may leave immunogenic surface epitopes intact [10,11,12]. The photo-crosslinking property of psoralens has been exploited to inactivate microorganisms in the blood supply [13,14,15] for the treatment of skin disorders [16], to inactivate viral pathogens prior to organ transplantation, and for inactivation of viruses for potential vaccines [17,18,19,20]. Neither exposure to psoralens alone nor exposure to long-wave UV light alone was sufficient to inactivate DNA or RNA viruses, and incubation with psoralens in the absence of UV light did not cause observable cell death [12]. We previously used dengue virus as a representative positive single-stranded RNA (ssRNA(+)) genome virus and demonstrated inactivation of the virus with the psoralen compound 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT) [21,22]. The inactivated dengue virus retained the ability to bind to a panel of five monoclonal antibodies specific for Dengue-2 (DENV-2) envelope protein and elicited a T-cell response in vaccinated mice similar to live, non-inactivated virus [10]. Here we extended the inactivation method to multiple virus families, and examined the suitability of psoralen-inactivated viral RNA for molecular biology applications such as reverse transcription PCR and sequencing. The antigenicity of inactivated virus in the production of antivirus antisera was also examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Virus Propagation

Orthomyxoviruses were propagated in MDCK cells; Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus (CCHFV) in HepG2 cells and Lassa virus (LASV) was grown in both RK13 and Vero cells. All other viruses were propagated in Vero cells. Eighty to ninety-five percent confluent cultures were inoculated at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001 and propagated in Minimal Essential Medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (product number 15240-062, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Six to ten days (depending on the virus) post-inoculation, the culture supernatant was collected, centrifuged at low speed to remove cell debris, and used as virus preparation.

2.2. Virus Inactivation by Psoralen

DENV-2 was inactivated according to a previously described method [21]. AMT (product number A4330, CAS number 62442-61-9; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added at a final concentration of 10 µg/mL to a DENV-2 stock of 106.4 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) per milliliter. Five-milliliter aliquots of the mixture were transferred into the wells of 6-well plates. The plates were exposed to UV-A radiation (365 nm; Multiple-Ray Lamp, Ultra Violet Products, Upland, CA, USA) for 0, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 min at a measured energy level of 200 µW/cm2 (Radiometer, Model PMA2100, UVA+B Detector, Model PMA2107, Solar Light, Glenside, PA, USA). Other viruses inactivated in a similar manner included CCHF IbAr10200 (105.1 TCID50/mL), Lassa Josiah (105.0 TCID50/mL) (LASV), and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Jordan (106.9 TCID50/mL) (MERS-CoV). A UV-A radiation energy level of 1000 µW/cm2 and 20 µg/mL AMT was required to fully inactivate Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis TC83 (106.7 TCID50/mL) (VEEV), Junin Candid #1 (104.2 TCID50/mL) (JUNV), Rift Valley Fever ZH-501 (107.8 TCID50/mL) (RVFV), and Ebola Zaire (107.3 TCID50/mL) (EBOV). JUNV and RVFV required 90 min UV-A exposure for full inactivation. EBOV required 120 min UV-A exposure for full inactivation. At each time point, an aliquot was removed from the plates and the titer was determined by TCID50. Each aliquot was assayed for viability by virus isolation in Vero cells using indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) assay.

2.3. TCID50

A TCID50 assay was adapted from Lennette [23]. Aliquots from each time point were placed into wells of a 96-well plate containing Vero cells at 95% confluency. The aliquots were serially diluted 1:10 in the plates for a total of 11 dilutions. Plates were incubated at 37 °C at 5% CO2 for 10 days. Cell monolayers were observed microscopically for the presence of CPE. The TCID50 endpoint dilution was calculated by the Reed and Muench method [24].

2.4. Antibody Production

Female New Zealand white rabbits from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA) received injections of viral antigen on days 0, 30, and 60 followed by exsanguination on day 90. The day 0 injection consisted of 250 µL of antigen emulsified with 250 µL of complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). The remaining injections consisted of 250 µL of antigen emulsified with 250 µL of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). The injected virus antigen was clarified supernatant centrifuged at 2000 RPM at 4°C for 15 min. The minimum pre-inactivation or live titer for injected viral antigen was 1.0 × 106 TCID50/mL.

2.5. Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA)

Viruses were tested by IFA [25,26]. Aliquots of virus from each inactivation test time point were placed into cell culture flasks containing Vero cell monolayers at 95% confluency. Flasks were incubated at 37 °C at 5% CO2 for 10 days and periodically observed for CPE. Cultures were allowed to incubate for the maximum possible time to allow any viable virus to have a chance to replicate to detectable levels. After 10 days, a portion of each culture supernatant was placed into new cell culture flasks and incubated under the same conditions for another 10 days and observed for CPE. The resulting cell monolayers were scraped and applied to microscope slides following the method of Hsiung [26]. Briefly, droplets of cell suspension were applied to slides and allowed to dry at room temperature in the biosafety cabinet (BSC). The sides were fixed for 15 min in acetone to permeabilize the cell membrane and secure the cells to the slide. After acetone fixation, the slides were probed with an anti-virus antibody followed by a fluorescein-labeled goat anti-species antibody (Table 1). Slides were then microscopically screened to detect cells exhibiting fluorescence.
Table
Table 1. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) reagents.
Table 1. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) reagents.
VirusPrimary AntibodyPrimary SourceSecondary AntibodySecondary Source
VEEVMouse monoclonalMillipore 1Goat anti-mouseKPL 6
JUNVAscitic fluidATCC 2Goat anti-mouseKPL
RVFVRabbit polyclonalNBACC 3Goat anti-rabbitKPL
MERS-CoVRabbit polyclonalSino Biological 4Goat anti-rabbitKPL
EBOVRabbit polyclonalNBACCGoat anti-rabbitKPL
DENVMouse monoclonalGenWay Biotech 5Goat anti-mouseKPL
1 EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA; 2 American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; 3 National Biodefence Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Fort Detrick, MD, USA; 4 Sino Biological, Inc. North Wales, PA, USA; 5 Genway Biotech Inc. San Diego, CA, USA; 6 Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc. Gaithersburg, MD, UAS. VEEV: Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis TC83; JUNV: Junin Candid #1; RVFV: Rift Valley Fever ZH-501; MERS-CoV: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Jordan; EBOV: Ebola Zaire; DENV: dengue virus.

2.6. Flow Cytometry

The amount of DENV internalization by host cells was determined in the Raji B-cell leukemic cell line stably expressing the dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) molecule [27]. Briefly, 50 µL/well of live and psoralen-inactivated DENV at a concentration of 1.7 × 107 pfu/mL were added to a V-bottom 96-well plate (Corning Incorporated, NY, USA) containing 1 × 105 per 50 µL of Raji-DC-SIGN cells. After 4 h of incubation in a humidified 37 °C CO2 incubator, the cells were washed, fixed, and permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™ kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The fixed cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody to DENV envelope protein (3H5) or an IgG1 isotype control (BD Biosciences) followed by a FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) labeled secondary goat-anti-mouse IgG antibody (NBACC). Cells not treated with virus served as the negative control. After 30 min of staining for each step, the cells were sorted on a FACSCANTO II (BD Biosciences). The percent of 3H5 positive cells represented the number of cells that captured and internalized DENV using the DC-SIGN receptor.

2.7. Oligonucleotide Primer and Probe Design and Generation

Sequences for virus genes were obtained from Genbank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank). Primers and probes were designed using Integrated DNA Technologies PrimerQuest primer and probe design tool (http://www.idtdna.com/PrimerQuest/Home/Index). All oligonucleotide primers and probes used in this study are listed in Table 2. Oligonucleotide primers and probes were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA).
Table
Table 2. Primers and probes used in this study.
Table 2. Primers and probes used in this study.
NameTargetSequenceProduct Size (bp)Reference
DENV-8 FNS3GCTGAAATGGAGGAAGCCCT637this study
DENV-8 RCCCGCTCTTCACCATCTGTT
DENV-8 PCAGAGCTGAGCACACCGGGC
DENV-9 FNS4BAGTTCCCCTTCTCGCCATTG961this study
DENV-9 RGAGTGTTCGTCCTGCTTCCA
DENV-9 PAAAAGAGCAGCGGCGGGCAT
DENV-3 FRdRp/NS5TACAACATGATGGGAAAGCGAGAGAAAAA265[28]
DENV-3 RGTGTCCCAGCCGGCGGTGTCATCAGC
DENV-3 PAAGAGACGTGAGCAGGAAGGAAGGGGGAGC
DENV-10 FNS5GGAGGAGCAATGTATGCCGA735this study
DENV-10 RGTCGCGTCTGTGGAAGTACA
DENV-10 PGGTCTTTGCGGGAGACGGCC
DENV-11 FNS5/UTRAGAGAAGACCAATGGTGCGG488this study
DENV-11 RCCTTCCAGCGAGACTACAGC
DENV-11 PCTACCTGTGAGCCCCGTCCAAG
EBOV-Z FNPTGGAAAAAACATTAAGAGAACACTTGC79[29]
EBOV-Z RAGGAGAGAAACTGACCGGCAT
EBOV-Z PCATGCCGGAAGAGGAGACAACTGAAGC
JUNV FNPCAGTTCATCCCTCCCCAGATC79[30]
JUNV RGGTTGACAGACTTATGTCCATGAAGA
JUNV PTGTTCAACGAAACACAGTTTTCAAGGTGGG
LASV FGPCTGCTAGTACAGACAGTGCAATGAG79[30]
LASV RTAGTGACATTCTTCCAGGAAGTGC
LASV PTGTTCATCACCTCTTC
MARV FVP40GGACCACTGCTGGCCATATC103[31]
MARV RGAGAACATITCGGCAGGAAG
MARV PATCCTAAACAGGCTTGTCTTCTCTGGGAC TT
RVFV FLTGAAAATTCCTGAGACACATGG89[32]
RVFV RACTTCCTTGCATCATCTGATG
RVFV PCAATGTAAGGGGCCTGTGTGGACTTGTG

2.8. RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted from psoralen-treated cell supernatants using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All extracted RNA samples were eluted in a volume of 120 µL. RNA purity was assessed using a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and the Qubit® RNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was stored at −80 °C.

2.9. Reverse Transcription Real-Time PCR Assay

Reverse Transcription Real-Time PCR assays were performed using the SuperScript® III Platinum One-Step qRT-PCR Kit w/ROX (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions, using a final concentration of 0.2 µM/reaction for each of the primers, and 0.1 µM/reaction for each probe. Five microliters of sample were assayed per 50 µL reaction. Each reaction consisted of 1 cycle of 50 °C for 15 min for reverse transcription, followed by 1 cycle of 95 °C for 2 min for reverse transcriptase inactivation, then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 75 s. Reverse transcription real-time PCR assays for each target included no-template controls and test samples. All reverse transcription real-time PCR reactions were run on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT or 7500 Fast (Life Technologies) in standard mode.

2.10. Sanger Sequencing

PCR amplicons were sequenced using the Applied Biosystems BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and POP-7™ Polymer (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions were processed on an Applied Biosystems 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies). Raw sequences were analyzed using Sequencher 5.3 software (Genecodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

2.11. Next Generation Sequencing

Total RNA prepared from psoralen-inactivated DENV was reverse transcribed using random primers and Superscript® III Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was amplified with the Ready-To-Go GenomiPhi V3 Kit (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and a Nextera® XT library (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was prepared for sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq platform following the manufacturer’s instructions in protocol “Paired-end 2 × 150 bp” (Illumina), which uses joined fragments of known length to provide more information in regions of repetitive sequence [33,34].

3. Results

3.1. Inactivation of DENV Using a Psoralen and UV-A

Dengue virus (a representative ssRNA(+) virus) was previously inactivated by 30 min of UV-A exposure in the presence of a psoralen compound, AMT [21,22]. Treated viruses were subjected to plaque assay to demonstrate inactivation and were successfully used as antigen for mouse antibody production. Here, inactivation of DENV was assessed by TCID50, repeat TCID50 after subculture, and IFA. Again, thirty minutes of exposure to UV-A light in the presence of AMT was sufficient to reduce viability to a level undetectable by TCID50 after 10 days of culture. However, sequentially passaged subcultures displayed visible CPE after a second 10 days of culture and virus was detectable by IFA. This is a significant change from the earlier plaque assay data and illustrates that rigorous testing methods must be used to confirm inactivation. Forty minutes of exposure to UV-A light in the presence of AMT was required to fully inactivate DENV as determined by CPE and IFA after two ten-day sequential cultures (Table 3). Viral cultures that were exposed to UV light but not AMT showed no reduction in viability.
Table
Table 3. DENV viability assessed by TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose), cytopathic effects (CPE) and IFA after inactivation with 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT) plus ultraviolet light.
Table 3. DENV viability assessed by TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose), cytopathic effects (CPE) and IFA after inactivation with 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT) plus ultraviolet light.
Minutes UV-A ExposureUV-A µW/cm2Passage 1Passage 2
Log10 TCID50/mLCPEIFACPEIFA
006.4yesyesyesyes
24005.8yesyesyesyes
510004.9yesyesyesyes
1020003.5yesyesyesyes
2040001.9yesyesyesyes
3060000nonoyesyes
4080000nononono
5010,0000nononono
6012,0000nononono

3.2. Inactivation of Multiple Additional Viruses Using a Psoralen and UV-A

To assess the general applicability of psoralen-mediated virus inactivation, representative viruses from seven families were exposed to UV-A in the presence of AMT (Table 4). Viruses tested included both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses, spherical and filamentous viruses, and both positive and negative sense RNA genomes. Inactivation was achieved for all viruses tested. The rate of titer reduction varied for each virus, suggesting that inactivation was dose-dependent. For example, MARV and EBOV required 100- to 1000-fold more exposure to UV-A in the presence of AMT for inactivation than RVFV and DENV (Figure 1). Each virus treatment was replicated a minimum of eight times.
Table
Table 4. Total microwatts UV-A required to inactivate different viruses in the presence of 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT).
Table 4. Total microwatts UV-A required to inactivate different viruses in the presence of 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT).
FamilyCharacteristicsVirusUV-A + AMT Required for Inactivation (µW/cm2)
Alphaviridaeenveloped, spherical, ssRNA(+)VEEV20,000
Arenaviridaeenveloped, spherical, ssRNA(-)LASV30,000
JUNV90,000
Bunyaviridaeenveloped, spherical, ssRNA(-)RVFV90,000
CCHFV4000
Coronaviridaeenveloped, spherical, ssRNA(+)MERS-CoV6000
Filoviridaefilamentous, ssRNA(-)MARV150,000
EBOV120,000
Flaviviridaeenveloped, spherical, ssRNA(+)DENV8000
WNV2000
SLEV1000
YFV2000
Orthomyxoviridaeenveloped, usually spherical but can be filamentous, ssRNA(-) H1N1p1000
H1N11000
H3N22000
Flu-B2000
WNV: West Nile; SLEV: St. Louis Encephalitis; YFV: Yellow Fever; H1N1: Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09; H3N2: Influenza A (H3N2); Flu-B: Influenza B.
Viruses 07 02912 g001 1024
Figure 1. Dose-dependent inactivation of multiple viruses by UV-A in the presence of 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT).
Figure 1. Dose-dependent inactivation of multiple viruses by UV-A in the presence of 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT).
Viruses 07 02912 g001

3.3. Viral RNA Retains Molecular Integrity after AMT Treatment

To determine whether the viral RNA isolated from AMT-inactivated viruses was useful for molecular analyses, five representative viruses were tested for competence in reverse-transcription real-time PCR after inactivation with AMT. Junin virus and Lassa virus (Arenaviridae), Rift Valley fever virus (Bunyaviridae), and Marburg and Ebola viruses (Filoviridae) were each successfully amplified using well-characterized and previously published assays (see the materials and methods section). Five microliters of fully inactivated JUNV produced a cycle threshold (Ct) of 32.13, LASV 19.48, RVFV 32.07, MARV 18.08, and EBOV 21.03. Each inactivated virus produced an amplicon of the expected size. Amplicons from LASV, JUNV, RVFV, and EBOV were successfully sequenced and produced identical sequence to untreated virus.
In order to more fully investigate the properties of RNA from an AMT-inactivated virus, five reverse-transcription real-time PCR assays were designed that targeted DENV, a virus with a positive-sense RNA genome. Targets ranging from 119 base pairs (bp) to 961 bp in length were chosen to represent multiple genes and the 3′ untranslated region of the genome. All five targets were successfully amplified from AMT-inactivated DENV. Any photoadducts present in the genome after AMT treatment were not inhibitory to reverse transcription. The cycle in which the fluorescent signal was detectable above background (Ct) of reactions using inactivated virus was similar to the Ct of reactions using live, untreated virus (Table 5). Each DENV amplicon was successfully sequenced and produced sequence identical to that produced by DENV not treated with AMT (data not shown).
Table
Table 5. Five PCR targets in DENV and the cycle thresholds (Cts) produced after 0 min (negative control), 30 min, and 60 min exposure to UV-A in the presence of 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT).
Table 5. Five PCR targets in DENV and the cycle thresholds (Cts) produced after 0 min (negative control), 30 min, and 60 min exposure to UV-A in the presence of 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT).
PrimersTargetSize (base pairs)Nucleotide LocationAverage Ct/Minutes
AMT + UV-A Exposure
03060
DENV-8NS3637520615.3917.5319.30
DENV-9NS4B961709517.3220.2220.21
DENV-3RdRp/NS5120892328.6329.3830.31
DENV-10NS5735914821.1022.7021.35
DENV-11NS5/UTR4891009317.0117.2518.77
DENV RNA isolated from psoralen-inactivated preparations was reverse-transcribed, amplified, and subjected to whole genome sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq using a paired-end strategy of two 150 bp reads. Approximately 98% of the DENV genome was covered in 13,909 of 203,040,312 total reads. Sequencing coverage varied with the majority of the genome falling between 25- and 400-fold (Figure 2).
Viruses 07 02912 g002 1024
Figure 2. Coverage plot for the Dengue-2 virus genome from the HiSeq reads that mapped to the genome. The differences in coverage between different areas of the genome are probably related to RNA folding, bias in library preparation, or GC content [35], but we cannot rule out the hypothesis that the areas of reduced coverage are due to photoadduct formation after 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT)+UV-A inactivation.
Figure 2. Coverage plot for the Dengue-2 virus genome from the HiSeq reads that mapped to the genome. The differences in coverage between different areas of the genome are probably related to RNA folding, bias in library preparation, or GC content [35], but we cannot rule out the hypothesis that the areas of reduced coverage are due to photoadduct formation after 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT)+UV-A inactivation.
Viruses 07 02912 g002

3.4. Viral Surface Epitopes Maintain Integrity after Psoralen Treatment

AMT-inactivated DENV was previously shown to bind to a panel of monoclonal antibodies specific for DENV-2 envelope protein and to be highly immunogenic in mice and monkeys [10,20]. In this study, additional AMT-inactivated viruses were tested for immunogenicity and antibody generation. Rabbits were inoculated with live or psoralen-inactivated LASV and CCHFV. The collected serum was used as the primary antibody in an IFA against live-virus infected tissue cultures. AMT-inactivated LASV and CCHFV elicited antibodies that specifically recognized untreated LASV and CCHFV, respectively. The antibodies generated against AMT-inactivated viruses were used at the same working dilutions in the IFA as antibodies against untreated virus (Table 6), indicating that titer of each was similar in the serum. This suggests that the antigens on the surface of both live and inactivated viruses were recognized equally well by the rabbit immune system.
Table
Table 6. Antibodies produced in response to live and 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT) + UV-A inactivated Lassa virus and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus recognized untreated viruses of the same type equally well.
Table 6. Antibodies produced in response to live and 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT) + UV-A inactivated Lassa virus and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus recognized untreated viruses of the same type equally well.
AgentRabbit NumberTiter
AMT + UV-A LASV4798761:320
AMT + UV-A LASV4798771:320
AMT + UV-A LASV4798781:320
LASV4798791:320
LASV4798801:320
LASV4798811:640
AMT + UV-A CCHFV4798821:160
AMT + UV-A CCHFV4798831:320
AMT + UV-A CCHFV4798841:640
CCHFV4798851:320
CCHFV4798861:320
CCHFV4798871:320

3.5. AMT + UV-A Treated Virus Loses Infectivity While Retaining Receptor Binding

IFA is frequently used to detect viral infection of cultured cells, and has been used in this study to demonstrate that viruses treated with psoralen were fully inactivated. After inactivation with AMT and UV-A, EBOV preparations in cell culture were incubated for 10 days at 37 °C before visualization of viruses using IFA. Some fluorescence was visible within the cells, indicating that the virus had been recognized by cell-surface receptors and internalized. The level of fluorescence was significantly lower than the level observed in the positive control cultures containing live virus (Figure 3), even though similar amounts of virus were inoculated to the flask. This suggests that the amount of inactivated virus present did not increase during the 10-day incubation. After subculture and a second 10-day incubation, the level of fluorescence was very low and nearly indistinguishable from the negative control cultures. After two additional rounds of subculture and incubation for a total of 40 days in culture, there was no discernable virus in the culture inoculated with AMT-treated EBOV (as indicated by lack of CPE and lack of fluorescence by IFA, Figure 3d), indicating that no viral replication had taken place and the virus was completely inactivated by the AMT and UV-A treatment.

3.6. AMT-Inactivated Viruses Specifically Bind Cell Receptors

Dengue virus enters the cell via specific interaction with clathrin-coated pits [36] and the DC-SIGN receptor [37]. Flow cytometry was used to establish that viruses inactivated with AMT were still competent to interact with DC-SIGN cellular receptors and become internalized. A DC-SIGN expressing cell line [27] was incubated with live and AMT-inactivated DENV. FACS was used to identify cells with internalized virus. A similar proportion of cells showed intracellular fluorescence when incubated with AMT-inactivated virus as when incubated with live DENV (Figure 4), suggesting that the psoralen-inactivated DENV was captured and internalized to the same extent as live DENV in host cells.
Viruses 07 02912 g003 1024
Figure 3. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) images of Vero cells inoculated with Ebola Zaire virus (EBOV). Anti-EBOV antibody bound virus particles and was in turn bound by fluorescein-labeled goat-anti rabbit. Each image shows fluorescence detected after 10 days in culture: (A) negative control, cells only; (B) positive control, cells 10 days after inoculation with virus that was exposed to UV-A light but not treated with 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT); (C) cells 10 days after inoculation with inactivated virus, fluorescent foci indicate internalized virus particles; and (D) cells after inoculation with inactivated virus and subculture four times, for a total of 40 days incubation.
Figure 3. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) images of Vero cells inoculated with Ebola Zaire virus (EBOV). Anti-EBOV antibody bound virus particles and was in turn bound by fluorescein-labeled goat-anti rabbit. Each image shows fluorescence detected after 10 days in culture: (A) negative control, cells only; (B) positive control, cells 10 days after inoculation with virus that was exposed to UV-A light but not treated with 4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen (AMT); (C) cells 10 days after inoculation with inactivated virus, fluorescent foci indicate internalized virus particles; and (D) cells after inoculation with inactivated virus and subculture four times, for a total of 40 days incubation.
Viruses 07 02912 g003
Viruses 07 02912 g004 1024
Figure 4. Intracellular staining of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) receptor-expressing cells incubated with inactivated, live, or no Dengue-2 virus (DENV). The proportion of cells to the right of the first vertical line is the proportion that were stained for the DENV E protein (3H5).
Figure 4. Intracellular staining of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) receptor-expressing cells incubated with inactivated, live, or no Dengue-2 virus (DENV). The proportion of cells to the right of the first vertical line is the proportion that were stained for the DENV E protein (3H5).
Viruses 07 02912 g004

4. Discussion

The methods of virus inactivation widely in use rely on intense heat or toxic chemicals to render the virus non-infectious. The treatments also denature or crosslink proteins and nucleic acids, preventing inactivated virus preparations from being fully effective as antigens and diminishing or preventing amplification of the nucleic acids for PCR or sequencing. DENV had previously been shown to be inactivated by exposure to UV-A light in the presence of AMT [10]. In this study, this method of inactivating virus preparations was extended to multiple virus families.
The method was effective at inactivating Alpha-, Arena-, Bunya-, Corona-, Filo-, Flavi- and Orthomyxoviruses. Among the families represented were spherical and flexuous viruses, as well as those with positive- and negative-sense RNA genomes, which suggests that the inactivation method will be successful for all RNA viruses. Each virus tested required a different amount of UV-A exposure in the presence of AMT for inactivation, and an increasing proportion of the virus particles became inactivated with increasing exposure to UV-A, indicating a dose-dependent response to the treatment. Rod-shaped viruses that use a polyprotein strategy required orders of magnitude more microwatts of UV-A than most segmented viruses for full inactivation. It is not known why such a large range of susceptibility to AMT + UV-A inactivation was observed. There does not seem to be a consistent set of virus characteristics that leads to the requirement for more exposure to AMT + UV-A for full inactivation. For example some enveloped, spherical viruses tested required only low levels of UV-A in the presence of AMT for full inactivation (CCHFV, H1N1p), while others required quite high levels (JUNV, RVFV). Virus concentration in the inactivation reaction, the type of virus, and the light conditions or UV-A intensity are all parameters that could conceivably alter the inactivation process. It is likely that each individual investigator will have to perform a titration experiment to define the appropriate conditions that consistently produce inactivation in their chosen virus system.
The method of virus inactivation via UV-A exposure in the presence of AMT has multiple benefits. We were able to use AMT-inactivated viruses as targets for antibody detection in IFA and FACS and as antigen for production of new polyclonal antibodies. The polyclonal antibodies produced against inactivated virus worked equally well for detecting untreated virus compared to antibodies produced against live virus preparations. These data taken together suggest that the surface proteins of the inactivated viruses are intact and correctly oriented, allowing full interactions with cells and protein complexes. This will allow viruses inactivated by this method to be used in vaccine development, in antibody generation for research, as positive controls for antibody-based detection assays, or studied by microscopy. The nucleic acids extracted from AMT-inactivated viruses were non-infectious and were sufficiently undamaged in EBOV, JUNV, LASV, MARV and RVFV to achieve successful detection by reverse-transcription real time PCR. The viral nucleic acids were non-infectious and sufficiently undamaged in DENV to be appropriate substrates for real time PCR and both Sanger and next-generation sequencing, thus supporting these methods at lower levels of biocontainment. Library-preparation attempts for next-generation sequencing using standard methods for AMT-inactivated LASV and VEEV were unsuccessful, which may indicate that the crosslinking of these viruses in our hands was too great to allow next-generation sequencing. However, amplicons of up to 971 base pairs were successfully detected by PCR, suggesting that number of photoadducts per genome is less than 1 per 1000 bases, at least in the case of DENV. The 3′ end of the DENV genome was amplified as readily as an internal target, which suggests that the photoadducts are not concentrated near the ends of the virus. Most importantly, the method provides inactive, non-infectious virus preparations that may be reliably sterility tested without attempting to remove toxic chemicals from the preparations.
If this method of viral inactivation is to become a generally accepted method of inactivation, it is necessary to perform multiple site-specific and agent-specific validation studies rigorously testing the method under multiple scenarios to ensure that preparations inactivated by this method are truly non-infectious. The UV-A exposure time and AMT concentration required to inactivate each virus is affected by viral titer and is species-specific, and may even be strain-specific. More data are needed to determine if all members of families of viruses react the same to the treatment. Investigators should work closely with their Health and Safety Offices to plan studies with multiple methods of analysis and a statistically significant number of replicates. In time, this method could provide rapid access to virus preparations and genomic material from pathogenic samples quickly and safely.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Greg Kocher for antibody production and Dr. Rick Blank for critical review of the manuscript. The Raji/DC-SIGN Cells from Li Wu and Vineet N. KewalRamani were obtained through the NIH AIDS Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH. All research was conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and experiments involving animals and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2011). The facility where this research was conducted is fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. This work was funded under Agreement No. HSHQDC-07-C-00020 awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) for the management and operation of the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC), a Federally Funded Research and Development Center. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the DHS or S&T. In no event shall the DHS, NBACC, S&T or Battelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) have any responsibility or liability for any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein. DHS does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication

Author Contributions

K.S., T.K., P.S., and J.B. conceived and designed the experiments. L.W.-E., M.L.-E., E.W., K.S., T.H.W., and P.S. performed the experiments. K.S., M.R., B.O., T.K., and E.W. analyzed the data. K.S., S.B., and T.K. wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sagripanti, J.L.; Hülseweh, B.; Grote, G.; Voss, L.; Böhling, K.; Marschall, H.J. Microbial inactivation for safe and rapid diagnostics of infectious samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7289–7295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pivovarova, N.B.; Nguyen, H.V.; Winters, C.A.; Brantner, C.A.; Smith, C.L.; Andrews, S.B. Excitotoxic calcium overload in a subpopulation of mitochondria triggers delayed death in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 5611–5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moller, L.; Schunadel, L.; Nitsche, A.; Schwebke, I.; Hanisch, M.; Laue, M. Evaluation of virus inactivation by formaldehyde to enhance biosafety of diagnostic electron microscopy. Viruses 2015, 7, 666–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kading, R.; Crabtree, M.; Miller, B. Inactivation of infectious virus and serological detection of virus antigen in Rift Valley fever virus-exposed mosquitoes fixed with paraformaldehyde. J. Virol. Methods 2013, 189, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wilton, T.; Dunn, G.; Eastwood, D.; Minor, P.D.; Martin, J. Effect of formaldehyde inactivation on poliovirus. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 11955–11964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. She, Y.M.; Cheng, K.; Farnsworth, A.; Li, X.; Cyr, T.D. Surface modifications of influenza proteins upon virus inactivation by β-propiolactone. Proteomics 2013, 13, 3537–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Delrue, I.; Delputte, P.L.; Nauwynck, H.J. Assessing the functionality of viral entry-associated domains of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus during inactivation procedures, a potential tool to optimize inactivated vaccines. Vet. Res. 2009, 40, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chomczynski, P.; Sacchi, N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 162, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blow, J.A.; Dohm, D.J.; Negley, D.L.; Mores, C.N. Virus inactivation by nucleic acid extraction reagents. J. Virol. Methods 2004, 119, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Raviprakash, K.; Sun, P.; Raviv, Y.; Luke, T.; Martin, N.; Kochel, T. Dengue virus photo-inactivated in presence of 1,5-iodonaphthylazide (INA) or AMT, a psoralen compound (4′-aminomethyl-trioxsalen) is highly immunogenic in mice. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013, 9, 2336–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Groene, W.S.; Shaw, R.D. Psoralen preparation of antigenically intact noninfectious rotavirus particles. J. Virol. Methods 1992, 38, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hanson, C.V.; Riggs, J.L.; Lennette, E.H. Photochemical inactivation of DNA and RNA viruses by psoralen derivatives. J. Gen. Virol. 1978, 40, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Allain, J.P.; Hsu, J.; Pranmeth, M.; Hanson, D.; Stassinopoulos, A.; Fischetti, L.; Corash, L.; Lin, L. Quantification of viral inactivation by photochemical treatment with amotosalen and UV A light, using a novel polymerase chain reaction inhibition method with preamplification. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 194, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lin, L.; Cook, D.N.; Wiesehahn, G.P.; Alfonso, R.; Behrman, B.; Cimino, G.D.; Corten, L.; Damonte, P.B.; Dikeman, R.; Dupuis, K.; et al. Photochemical inactivation of viruses and bacteria in platelet concentrates by use of a novel psoralen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light. Transfusion 1997, 37, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Snyder, E.L.; Dodd, R.Y. Reducing the risk of blood transfusion. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2001, 1, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berg, M.; Ros, A.M. Treatment of psoriasis with psoralens and ultraviolet A. A double-blind comparison of 8-methoxypsoralen and 5-methoxypsoralen. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 1994, 10, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. McNeal, M.M.; Rae, M.N.; Ward, R.L. Effects of different adjuvants on rotavirus antibody responses and protection in mice following intramuscular immunization with inactivated rotavirus. Vaccine 1999, 17, 1573–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, J.; Murtadha, M.; Schnell, M.; Eisenlohr, L.C.; Hooper, J.; Flomenberg, P. Human t-cell responses to vaccinia virus envelope proteins. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 10010–10020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sutjipto, S.; Pedersen, N.C.; Miller, C.J.; Gardner, M.B.; Hanson, C.V.; Gettie, A.; Jennings, M.; Higgins, J.; Marx, P.A. Inactivated simian immunodeficiency virus vaccine failed to protect rhesus macaques from intravenous or genital mucosal infection but delayed disease in intravenously exposed animals. J. Virol. 1990, 64, 2290–2297. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Kochel, T.J.; Maves, R.C.; Porter, K. A Psoralen-Inactivated Dengue Virus Vaccine and Method of Preparation. U.S. Patent 9,005,633 B2, 14 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  21. Maves, R.C.; Castillo Oré, R.M.; Porter, K.R.; Kochel, T.J. Immunogenicity of a psoralen-inactivated Dengue virus type 1 vaccine candidate in mice. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2010, 17, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Maves, R.C.; Oré, R.M.; Porter, K.R.; Kochel, T.J. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a psoralen-inactivated Dengue-1 virus vaccine candidate in Aotus nancymaae monkeys. Vaccine 2011, 29, 2691–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lennette, D.A. General principles for laboratory diagnosis of viral, rickettsial, and chlamydial infections. In Diagnostic Procedure for Viral, Rickettsial, and Chlamydial Infections, 7th ed.; Lennette, E.H., Lennette, D.A., Lennette, E.T., Eds.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  24. Reed, L.J.; Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 1938, 27, 493–497. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hsiung, G.D. Virus isolation and identification methods. In Hsiung’s Diagnostic Virology, 4th ed.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1994; pp. 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hsiung, G.D. Immunocytochemical assays: Immunofluorescent and immunoperoxidase staining for antigen detection. In Hsiung’s Diagnostic Virology, 4th ed.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1994; pp. 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu, L.; Martin, T.D.; Carrington, M.; KewalRamani, V.N. Raji B cells, misidentified as THP-1 cells, stimulate DC-SIGN-mediated HIV transmission. Virology 2004, 318, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chien, L.J.; Liao, T.L.; Shu, P.Y.; Huang, J.H.; Gubler, D.; Chang, G.J.J. Development of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays to detect and serotype Dengue viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Towner, J.S.; Sealy, T.K.; Ksiazek, T.G.; Nichol, S.T. High-throughput molecular detection of hemorrhagic fever virus threats with applications for outbreak settings. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196 (Suppl. 2), S205–S212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Trombley, A.R.; Wachter, L.; Garrison, J.; Buckley-Beason, V.A.; Jahrling, J.; Hensley, L.E.; Schoepp, R.J.; Norwood, D.A.; Goba, A.; Fair, J.N.; et al. Comprehensive panel of real-time taqman™ polymerase chain reaction assays for detection and absolute quantification of filoviruses, arenaviruses, and new world hantaviruses. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010, 82, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Towner, J.S.; Khristova, M.L.; Sealy, T.K.; Vincent, M.J.; Erickson, B.R.; Bawiec, D.A.; Hartman, A.L.; Comer, J.A.; Zaki, S.R.; Ströher, U.; et al. Marburgvirus genomics and association with a large hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Angola. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 6497–6516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bird, B.H.; Bawiec, D.A.; Ksiazek, T.G.; Shoemaker, T.R.; Nichol, S.T. Highly sensitive and broadly reactive quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for high-throughput detection of Rift Valley fever virus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3506–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fleischmann, R.D.; Adams, M.D.; White, O.; Clayton, R.A.; Kirkness, E.F.; Kerlavage, A.R.; Bult, C.J.; Tomb, J.F.; Dougherty, B.A.; Merrick, J.M. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 1995, 269, 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Paired-end Sequencing. Available online: http://www.illumina.com/technology/next-generation-sequencing/paired-end-sequencing_assay.html (accessed on 4 November 2015).
  35. Sims, D.; Sudbery, I.; Ilott, N.E.; Heger, A.; Ponting, C.P. Sequencing depth and coverage: Key considerations in genomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Van der Schaar, H.M.; Rust, M.J.; Chen, C.; van der Ende-Metselaar, H.; Wilschut, J.; Zhuang, X.; Smit, J.M. Dissecting the cell entry pathway of Dengue virus by single-particle tracking in living cells. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tassaneetrithep, B.; Burgess, T.H.; Granelli-Piperno, A.; Trumpfheller, C.; Finke, J.; Sun, W.; Eller, M.A.; Pattanapanyasat, K.; Sarasombath, S.; Birx, D.L.; et al. DC-SIGN (CD209) mediates Dengue virus infection of human dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schneider, K.; Wronka-Edwards, L.; Leggett-Embrey, M.; Walker, E.; Sun, P.; Ondov, B.; Wyman, T.H.; Rosovitz, M.; Bohn, S.S.; Burans, J.; et al. Psoralen Inactivation of Viruses: A Process for the Safe Manipulation of Viral Antigen and Nucleic Acid. Viruses 2015, 7, 5875-5888. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7112912

AMA Style

Schneider K, Wronka-Edwards L, Leggett-Embrey M, Walker E, Sun P, Ondov B, Wyman TH, Rosovitz M, Bohn SS, Burans J, et al. Psoralen Inactivation of Viruses: A Process for the Safe Manipulation of Viral Antigen and Nucleic Acid. Viruses. 2015; 7(11):5875-5888. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7112912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schneider, Katherine, Loni Wronka-Edwards, Melissa Leggett-Embrey, Eric Walker, Peifang Sun, Brian Ondov, Travis H. Wyman, MJ Rosovitz, Sherry S. Bohn, James Burans, and et al. 2015. "Psoralen Inactivation of Viruses: A Process for the Safe Manipulation of Viral Antigen and Nucleic Acid" Viruses 7, no. 11: 5875-5888. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7112912

APA Style

Schneider, K., Wronka-Edwards, L., Leggett-Embrey, M., Walker, E., Sun, P., Ondov, B., Wyman, T. H., Rosovitz, M., Bohn, S. S., Burans, J., & Kochel, T. (2015). Psoralen Inactivation of Viruses: A Process for the Safe Manipulation of Viral Antigen and Nucleic Acid. Viruses, 7(11), 5875-5888. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7112912

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop