Next Article in Journal
Functional Analyses of the Histone-like A104R Protein of African Swine Fever Virus and of a Homologous Pseudogene Product Found in Soft Tick Genomes
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in the Epidemiology of Pneumonia in Children Younger than 14 Years Old During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico, a National Multicenter Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Jamestown Canyon Virus Disease: An Analytic Review of Human Cases Reported from 1982 Through 2022

by
Stephen F. Johnson
and
Karin E. Peterson
*
Laboratory of Neurological Infections and Immunity, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, MT 59840, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2026, 18(2), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020271
Submission received: 10 December 2025 / Revised: 12 February 2026 / Accepted: 12 February 2026 / Published: 23 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Immunology, Vaccines, and Antivirals)

Abstract

Reports of acute Jamestown Canyon Virus (JCV) cases have increased markedly over the last 15 years, associated with improved diagnostic testing protocols. Analysis of these cases and the criteria used for their diagnosis could benefit clinicians encountering this under-recognized disease. In the current study, we analyzed all published reports of acute human JCV infections in North America from the first in 1982 through 2022, including retrospective studies. A total of 50 reports with 416 cases of JCV were found. The primary illness associated with JCV infection involved the nervous system. Of reported encephalitis cases, the fatality rate was 2.4 percent in hospitalized patients. Of the cases with detailed patient outcome information, approximately 40 percent had prolonged hospitalization and/or long-term neurological sequelae. Although case incidence has increased over the last few decades, the overall time from admission/clinical onset to testing for JCV has not substantially changed from the 1980s. Confounding factors such as being immunocompromised, as well as previous or concurrent infections, were associated with a greater risk of more severe outcomes. Thus, the complexity of JCV infection with other conditions may impact the overall outcomes of JCV encephalitis.

1. Introduction

Neuroinvasive infections are a serious threat to patients but are difficult to diagnose. Early manifestations can include headache, fever, poor ability to concentrate, malaise, and dizziness, which are nonspecific and similar to other febrile illnesses. Clinical symptoms characteristic of acute encephalitis syndrome (AES) may present later, limiting the timeframe for efficient evaluation and diagnosis to prevent further damage to the nervous system [1,2]. Indeed, in approximately 50% of encephalitic cases, no etiology for meningoencephalitis is confirmed [1,3], which may be due to delays in, or lack of, diagnostic testing [4]. Multiple efforts have been made to improve diagnosis over the last 60 years, including insightful reviews, clinical-pathological teaching conferences, and better diagnostics [1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Analyzing the reported cases for different encephalitic viruses may provide clues to help understand the specific parameters of diagnosis and provide guidance in diagnosis. In the current manuscript, we analyzed the reported cases for Jamestown Canyon Virus (JCV), a virus endemic to North America and an important cause of viral encephalitis [10,11,12,13].
JCV was first isolated in 1961 from mosquitoes isolated from Jamestown Canyon, Colorado [14]. Serological testing identified JCV as a member of the California Serogroup (CSG) of Orthobunyaviruses, based on serological cross-reactivity with California encephalitis virus (CEV) [14,15]. Other members of this serogroup include La Crosse virus (LACV), snowshoe hare virus (SSHV), trivittatus virus (TVTV), keystone virus (KEYV), and Inkoo virus (INKV). Seroprevalence of JCV and virus detection in mosquitoes indicate that JCV is widespread in North America, being found in Canada, Greenland, and the United States of America (USA) [10,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Seroprevalence studies in humans show a wide range of human exposure to JCV, with positive neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) detected in 4% of the population in one study to 42% of samples from the upper peninsula of Michigan [10,17,20,21,22]. In Nova Scotia, seropositivity in human samples ranged from 15% to 49%, with the highest seropositivity in a rural health care district [23]. These data indicate that JCV infection in humans occurs frequently and may be higher in rural settings than in urban environments.
Despite JCV seropositivity being widespread in North America, the actual number of confirmed human JCV encephalitis cases was relatively low until the early 2000s. The first reported acute human disease caused by JCV was not diagnosed until 1980 [24]. Speculation that JCV encephalitis was an emerging human disease was raised in a case series of 12 acute human JCV infections reported in 1983 in Ontario, Canada and upstate New York, USA [10]. A subsequent retrospective study of acute encephalitis of uncertain etiology in upstate New York detected 31 additional cases associated with positive plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) for JCV [25]. However, during the next 30 years, few additional human JCV infections were reported [10,22,26,27]. Screening with a virus-specific JCV IgM-capture-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (JCV IgM) was employed by the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) on all cases of suspected neuroinvasive arbovirus infection in 2013 [27]. The Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (CNML) added JCV IgM screening to the samples that they checked for West Nile virus (WNV) infection in 2015. These new screening methods resulted in an increase in detectable JCV cases in the United States and Canada (Figure 1A) suggesting that these cases were previously underreported.
To better understand JCV cases, we examined historical and current case reports of JCV encephalitis. We compare here the clinical symptoms and signs, method of diagnosis, confounding factors, and patient outcomes in order to determine commonalities or unique features that might aid the clinician with understanding the full breadth of clinical manifestations of JCV cases.

2. Methods

2.1. Analysis of the Literature and Determination of Cases for Inclusion as JCV

For this study, we searched the annual Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) of West Nile Virus and Other Arbovirus Diseases, the Public Health Agency of Canada’s West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-Borne Diseases Surveillance Report: Annual Edition, as well as completing a PubMed search for case reports on Jamestown Canyon viruses. All included cases are reported in Table S1. ArboNET data (Historic Data (2011–2024) | Jamestown Canyon Virus | CDC) was used only to clarify the origin or diagnostic classification of some cases published in the annual MMWR. We counted the cases in the MMWR annual reports and did not include ArboNET results separately in our totals. We compared location, year, as well as ages and sex when available, for cases reported by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), medical journals, and CNML to remove duplicated entries.
Our compilation of 44 references from PubMed is complete for the years 1971 through 2022, including some pre-1982 acute cases of unknown etiology tested retrospectively from serum stored in the Upstate New York Laboratory (Table S1). Consistent numbers were difficult to establish due to incomplete reporting from the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (CNML), which disclosed numbers of positive CSG tests from 2013 to 2018 but stopped reporting in 2019 because “CSG virus infections are not nationally notifiable diseases in Canada, so there is no formal surveillance system in place to monitor, track, and report cases” [28]. References are provided for all cases within the tables.

2.2. Analysis of Case Reports for Lumbar Puncture, Sample Sendoff, Awareness Interval Time, and Lab Results

When authors of a JCV report determined the first day of a patient’s illness and the reported time of cerebral spinal fluid collection, we employed that time in weeks as the CSF time interval (CTI). Otherwise, we employed the day of first contact of the patient with a clinician as the best marker to indicate CTI. Of the JCV cases reported, information for CTI was available for 34 cases. CTI for one patient (23, case 6) was more than 4.6 standard deviations above the mean, and onset of illness was unclear from the narrative, as the patient was only seen on a single occasion and then failed to follow up. These factors seemed sufficient to consider her an outlier and to exclude her from CTI analysis. Another case with prolonged CTI [5] associated with rituximab treatment was excluded due to the time of illness onset being unclear.
Awareness Time Interval (ATI) was calculated as the time from illness onset to the day of the first specimen draw that later implicated JCV as a probable or confirmed cause of the patient’s illness. This interval could be estimated for 41 of 49 cases. The actual time for laboratory JCV results from sample sendoff to laboratory results reported back to the clinicians could be determined for only 10 cases.

2.3. Analysis of Cases of Meeting CDC Criteria for Confirmation as JCV Positive

The CDC laboratory criteria for diagnosis of arboviral encephalitis include (i) “isolation of virus from, or demonstration of specific viral antigen or nucleic acid in, tissue, blood, CSF, or other body fluid, OR” (ii) “fourfold or greater change in virus-specific quantitative antibody titers in paired sera, OR” (iii) “virus-specific IgM antibodies in serum with confirmatory virus-specific neutralizing antibodies in the same or a later specimen, OR” (iv) “virus-specific IgM antibodies in CSF or serum” (https://ndc.services.cdc.gov/case-definitions/arboviral-diseases-neuroinvasive-and-non-neuroinvasive-2015/, accessed on 10 February 2026). Cases with sufficient information were analyzed on whether they met any of the above criteria as confirmation of being positive for JCV. We further devised the following definitions for probable reports of JCV with subcategories of P1-P4 for defining components that did not allow for full CDC criteria. These were P1 = inadequate clinical detail for neuroinvasive and non-neuroinvasive disease or to exclude a more likely explanation of symptoms or no specification of type of clinician, P2 = JCV IgM positive, but PRNT unchanging, P3 = inadequate testing for other probable viral causes, and P4 = inadequate testing by PRNT or IgM to exclude probable viral cross-reactive antibodies.

2.4. Analysis of Cases for Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES)

We examined the 49 detailed reports for AES criteria based on Venkatesan et al. [2]. The major criterion required is “Neurological dysfunction manifesting with altered mental status for more than 24 h without an alternative cause”. Minor criteria include: (a): Documented fever ≥ 38 °C (100.4 °F) within the 72 h before or after presentation”, (b) “generalized or partial seizures not fully attributable to a preexisting seizure disorder”, (c) “new onset of focal neurologic findings”, (d) “CSF WBC count ≥ 5/cubic mm3, (e) abnormality of brain parenchyma on neuroimaging” suggestive of encephalitis that is either new from prior studies or appears acute in onset, and (f) abnormality on electroencephalography that is consistent with encephalitis and not attributable to another cause.

3. Results

3.1. Human Case Reports of JCV

A total of 598 cases of persons with acute JCV infections have been reported since 1971 in North America (Table S1) [4,7,10,12,19,22,24,25,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Surveillance efforts by the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) or the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (CNML) account for at least 83 percent (498/598) of reported JCV infections, and those two reference laboratories assisted with the diagnosis of most of the remaining cases.
Clinical categories of diagnosis were available in a total of 416 JCV cases, including neurological and non-neurological disease (Table S1). Disease severity ranged from nonspecific fever to severe long-term impairment or death (Table S1). The major diagnosis in 291 of 416 (70.0%) of JCV infections involved the nervous system. The most severe clinical diagnosis was encephalitis (including acute encephalitis syndrome (AES) and meningoencephalitis), which occurred in 154 of 416 (37%) of the patients whose diagnosis was reported (Table S1). JCV meningitis occurred in 78 of 416 (18.8%) of patients. Clinical signs of JCV meningitis differed from those of encephalitis in that patients retained normal cognitive processing, levels of consciousness, absence of seizures, and a faster recovery time compared to encephalitis cases. Acute flaccid paralysis was reported for 12 cases (2.9%). An additional 61 patients were diagnosed as simply “neuroinvasive disease”. The 30% of symptomatic patients who were positive for JCV infection but not neuroinvasive disease had various defining illnesses, including one patient with pneumonia [10] and another with sepsis [58]. Non-neuroinvasive disease was observed in 125 of the 598 JCV infections (Table S1) [10,17,20,22,23]. Of these non-neurological cases, there are few details for long-term analysis. For example, seven cases were reported as “febrile illness without neurological involvement” with no further information [27].

3.2. JCV Cases with Detailed Analysis for Further Evaluation

Of the 416 cases of JCV infection, 49 individual case reports had sufficient information to compare their assessment with CDC arbovirus disease case definitions, clinical process of JCV diagnosis, and outcomes (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). Of the detailed individual JCV cases, 30 of the 49 cases (61%) were diagnosed with encephalitis (Table 1) per CDC definition (see Section 2). Acute encephalitis syndrome (AES) diagnosis, which requires a single major and three minor criteria as described in the methods, were found in 12 of the 30 encephalitis cases (40%). In 11 of the 30 encephalitic cases, brain biopsy or brain MRI were used to verify the diagnosis of encephalitis (Table 1). Four of the 49 cases were classified as non-neuroinvasive cases. One patient was reported with “viral illness”, another with “pneumonia,” and a third with “possible dengue” [10,22,50]. The fourth was a patients with sepsis [60]. Thus, of the 49 cases with detailed analysis, over half were diagnosed as encephalitis.

3.3. Probable and Confirmed Neuroinvasive Arbovirus Infection

We next analyzed the detailed case reports to determine whether they met probable or confirmed criteria for JCV based on CDC definition. Of the 49 cases, 28 (57%) met the “confirmed” case definitions (Table 2, column CR). The remaining 21 cases were classified as not fully confirmed (probable) for one or more of 4 reasons: (P1) insufficient narrative detail about the type of clinical involvement to support neuroinvasive or non-neuroinvasive infection or to exclude a more likely explanation of symptoms; (P2) JCV titer high but not increasing; (P3) insufficient testing for other probable viral causes, or (P4) insufficient rise in PRNT or IgM levels to exclude viral cross-reactive antibodies. Three cases had multiple reasons for rating them as “probable” rather than “confirmed.” No cases were defined as only P1, four cases were defined as P2, two cases for P3 and 12 cases for P4. Thus, the majority of cases met the CDC criteria for JCV encephalitis. Of the cases that did not, the general reason was due to a lack of sufficient rise in PRNT or IgM levels as an indication of active infection.

3.4. Timeline for Analysis of JCV as a Causative Agent

To gain information on the time frame for diagnosis, we computed an awareness time interval (ATI) from the reported day of illness to when samples were sent out to test for JCV infection. ATI could be measured in 41 cases with a median ATI of 1.3 weeks. From 1981 to 2022, the time needed to recognize possible JCV infection did not significantly change (Figure 2A). Another time interval, from clinical onset to when cerebral spinal fluid was taken for diagnostic testing, was recently shown as a critical factor in length of time to diagnosis for HSV-1 [69]. We next calculated this measurement (CSF time interval, CTI), which was available for 36 JCV cases. From 1980 to 2022, CTI increased slightly by 1 day (Figure 2B). For the 6 cases whose CTI delays were significantly longer than the trend line, the explanations were slow clinician recognition of acute encephalitis syndrome [70], patient delay before contacting a clinician [10,27], and slow disease progression [27]. Both the CTI and ATI were available for 32 cases (Figure 2C). Shorter CTI was generally associated with shorter ATI. Outliers of ATI were associated with delayed use of serum IgM for diagnosis (cases 7 and 4, Figure 2C green squares), slow rise in IgG and IgM (case 6, blue triangle), or an immune-compromised heart transplant patient who had both slow rise and delayed serum draws for IgG and IgM analysis (purple diamond) [34]. The largest outlier (red circle) was associated with persistent IgM from previous WNV infection and delayed serum draws of convalescent IgG testing [42]. Thus, there was no offset in timelines between general testing for encephalitic viruses via CSF collection (CTI) and specific testing for JCV (ATI). However, the time frame for each has not decreased over time but has remained relatively flat, indicating no improvement in earlier detection of JCV cases.
Table 1. Diagnosis and outcomes of cases with detailed information.
Table 1. Diagnosis and outcomes of cases with detailed information.
Year aAge, Sex bDiag cProd dAES e
Maj/min
Outcome fRef, Case
19808 FEYes1/5Hospitalized 27 days, no sequelae at 15 months[10,24], 1
198129 MMYes0/2Recovered 10 days later[10], 2
198139 FMYes0/1Cognitively impaired for 2–4 months[10], 3
198118 MNNYes0/0Discharged day 4[10], 4
198131 MMYes0/2Discharge at 6 days, no sequelae at 16 months[10], 5
198131 MMYes0/2Discharge at 3 days, no residua at 12 months[10], 6
198187 MEYes1/1NR[10], 7
198134 MPYes0/1NR[10], 8
198121 FMYes0/2Discharge at 3 days, no residua at 1 year[10], 9
198122 FNRYes0NR[10], 12
198244 FENR1/2Died[10], 10
198224 MNNNR0/1NR[10], 11
198252 MEYes1/4NR[22], 1
1982C MNNYes0/0NR[22], 2
198314 MMNR0/0NR[22], 3
198411 MMNRNRNR[70]
199720 FEYes1/12 months in hospital, 6 months LTC, severely disabled[26]
2001T MMYes0/2Full recovery[71]
200951 MENone0/2Recovered by 6 months. Follow up confirmed E.[42]
201153 MEYes1/2Hospitalized 28 days. Expressive aphasia persistent at 6 month follow up[58], 4
201148 MEYes1/4Full recovery[58], 2
201366 MEYes1/4Unable to resume work due to poor memory, ataxia, and depression[58], 1
201365 MEYes1/3Prolonged sequelae, brain atrophy[58], 3
201670 MEYes1/2Hospitalized 5 weeks, but full recovery[58], 5
2011–1680 FENR1/2Died[12]
201357 MEYes1/31 month in hospital, poor memory for several months[50], 1
201465 MEYes1/3Prolonged symptoms, brain biopsy was misleading[50], 2
201431 MNNYes0/0Recovered after 10 weeks[50], 3
201463 MNNYes0/1Recovered by 2 months[50], 4
201536 MEYes0/2Brain MRI verified E, symptoms lasted >1 year[50], 5
201668 FNNYes0/0NR[50], 6
201657 MEYes1/1Ongoing fatigue but working after 2 months[50], 7
201728 MNNYes1/0Dull headaches for >6 months[50], 8
201740 MENone1/2Retrograde amnesia precluded return to work for >1 month[50], 9
201462 MSYes1/1Hospitalized 5 days, symptoms better after 2 months[60]
201573 MEYes1/2Post-encephalitis dementia[68]
201631 MEYes1/3EEG improved on ribavirin, but patient died of sepsis. Biopsy confirmed E[62]
201726 MEYes0/3Brain MRI verified E, 5 days in hospital, fully recovered[67]
2017Ol MEYes1/2In hospital 21 days; deficits resolved by 4 months post-onset[46]
201756 MEYes1/3Brain biopsy verified E. Death and necropsy[4]
201810 FEYes0/3Brain MRI verified E. 4 days in hospital, was well at 2.5 weeks[55,56]
201848 FEYes1/13 hospitalizations within 53 days, then rehabilitation. Normal activities and cognitive function recovered[34]
202059 MEYes1/2Brain MRI verified E. Died on hospital day 21[66]
202159 MEYes1/3Brain MRI consistent with E. Cognitive deficits lingered and required family supervision[52]
202279 MEYes0/2Brain biopsy and brain MRI verified E. Improved by day 14 in hospital[59]
202257 FEYes1/3JTCV precipitated MOGAD. Initial cognitive impairment, but back to baseline at 2 months post[32]
202236 MMYes0/3Headache, neck stiffness and pain improved by day 6[72]
20184 FENone?/3Stable, but significant neurologic impairment[61]
202243 MEYes1/36 months after hospital discharge returned to work full-time[49]
(a) year case diagnosed, for series, year first case was diagnosed. Diagnostics for these cases are presented in Table 2. Cases in italics are further described in Table 3. (b) age in years and sex, M: male, F: female, C: college age, Ol: older mid-50s, T: teen. (c) Diagnosis of disease: AFP: acute flaccid paralysis, E: encephalitis, M: meningitis, ME: meningoencephalitis, NI: neuroinvasive, NN: not neuroinvasive, NR: not reported, P: pneumonia, S: sepsis. (d) Prod: Prodrome. Whether the patient reported initial symptoms of headache, confusion, anxiety, and irritability. (e) AES: acute encephalitis syndrome. Criteria based on Venkatesan et al. Table 1 [2]. Major criteria: Neurological dysfunction manifesting with altered mental status for more than 24 h without an alternative cause. Minor Criteria: (a) Documented fever ≥ 38 °C (100.4 °F) within the 72 h before or after presentation (b) generalized or partial seizures not fully attributable to a preexisting seizure disorder (c) new onset of focal neurologic findings (d) CSF WBC count ≥ 5/cubic mm3 (e) abnormality of brain parenchyma on neuroimaging suggestive of encephalitis that is either new from prior studies or appears acute in onset (f) abnormality on electroencephalography that is consistent with encephalitis and not attributable to another cause. (f) Outcomes as provided in the study. LTC: long-term care, NR: not reported or limited clinical information. Cases in bold indicate long-term impact or death.
Table 2. Symptomatology and diagnostic tests of cases in Table 1.
Table 2. Symptomatology and diagnostic tests of cases in Table 1.
Year, Case aSymptoms bLP c Tests dSerology Tests: + if Positive e SO fCSG Viruses
Tested g
SR hJTCV Results iCR jRef
1980,
1
8-day prodrome with fever+, then seizures and coma1.3CT, LP+, EEG+ EEE, SLE, WEE, but HSV+1.3LACV, CEV, SSHV, KEYV, TVTV, TAHV, SANVNRIgM +, PRNT 4-fold rise in paired-seraC[24]
1981,
2
Prodrome, HA, shaking chills+<0.4LP+ EEE, HSV, WEE, SLE, POW1.3LACV, KEYV, SSHVNRIgM not tested,
PRNT 8-fold rise
C[10]
1981,
3
Prodrome, fever+, stiff neckNo LPNREEE, HSV WEE, SLE, POW, mmp, meas3.0LACV, KEYV, SSHV NRIgM+
PRNT 16-fold rise
C[10]
1981,
4
Prodrome, HA, stiff neck1.0LP EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas7.9LACV, KEYV, SSHVNRPRNT stable and 8-fold higher, IgM+ P2[10]
1981,
5
HA, fever+, abnormal CSF0.2LP+EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas0.1LACV, KEYV, SSHVNRIgM+,
PRNT 8-fold rise
P4[10]
1981,
6
Prodrome, HA, fever+0.4LP+EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas11.6LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRDelayed IgM and
PRNT 4-fold rise
C[10]
1981,
7
Prodrome, coma+0.1LP+ EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas4.4LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRCF 2-fold rise, IgM+, PRNT 1:81,920 P2[10]
1981,
8
HA, fever+,
cough, stiff neck, HA
No LPChest X-Ray+EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas1.0LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRHI 8-fold rise, IgM+++, then dropped to 0, PRNT 1:5120C[10]
1981,
9
Prodrome, HA, fever+
0.6LP+EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas2.6LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRHI 4-fold rise, IgM+
PRNT 1:640
C[10]
1981,
12
HA, stiff neckNo LPNR EEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas0.6LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRIgM+, PRNT 1:320P2[10]
1982,
10
Seizures+, coma+, LP+0.4NREEE, WEE, SLE, POW, mmp, meas, HSV+ 16-fold rise1.9LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRIgM+++ and JCV PRNT 1:80 through-outP2[10]
1982,
11
HA, fever+No LPNREEE, WEE, SLE, HSV, POW, mmp, meas3.1LACV, SSHV, KEYVNRIgM negative to ++ and
PRNT 4-fold rise
C[10]
1982, 1HA, fever+, coma+, paralysis+,
seizures+
NRNRHSV and other CNS pathogens3.4 LAC, TVTNR>2-fold PRNT titer rise, IgM NRP4[22]
1982, 2Vesiculopapular rashNRNRHSVNRLAC, TVTNR16-fold PRNT titer rise, IgM NRC[22]
1983, 3Meningeal signsNRNRHSV6.0LAC, TVTNR4-fold PRNT titer rise, IgM NRC[22]
1984Aseptic meningitisNRNRNRNRCSG viruses, but members NRNoneHighest titers of HI, CF, PRNT, IgM+P1-P4[70]
1997Prodrome, confusion+, HA, fever+ 3.0LP+, CT, EEG, MRI+ EEE, WEE, SLE, POW, HSV, CMV, EBV, HIV 3.0 LACNRInitial CSF RT-PCR+, brain biopsy RT-PCR+C[26]
2001HA, fever+, diplopia+NRNRNRNR NRNRIgM+ by IFA, PRNT+P1, P3, P4[71]
2009HA, fever+, left side numbness+, mosquitoes2.3CT, MRI, LP, Carotid ultra-sound SLE. WNV (IgM+, but PRNT 1:320 unchanged)1.0LACVNRIgM+,
4-fold PRNT rise
C[42]
2011,
4
Prodrome, fever+, rash, confused+, HA1.1LP WNV, POW, EEE, WEE, Rickettsia, Borrelia, Ana-plasma+, but stable1.1SSHV + but IgM NRNRCSF IgM+ and PRNT increased 16-fold, serum IgM+ and PRNT increasedC[58]
2011,
2
Prodrome, HA, ataxia+, confusion+0.9CT, LP+, EEG+,
MRI+
HSV, VZV1.0SSHVNRIgM+ serum, PRNT rose 0 to 1:80C[58]
2013,
1
Prodrome, fever+, confusion+0.4EEG+, MRI+Crypto, HSV, VZV, >12 other micro-biology 0.4SSHV CSF PRNT and IgM negativeNRSerum PRNT IgM+ 1:40 then 1:80. CSF IgM+ 1:10C[58]
2013,
3
Prodrome, HA, fever+, mosquitoes0.9CT, LP+, HIV, WNV, Lyme, CMV, HSV, VZV0.9SSHV NRSerum JCV IgM+ in both samples, PRNT 0 to 1:40 later C[58]
2016,
5
Fever+, rash,0.9CT, MRIHIV, Parvo B19, WNV POW, LymeNRSSHV IgM+, PRNT 1:40 to 1:80NRSerum 1:320 to 1:1280, CSF IgM+ 1:4C[58]
2011 TO 2016Confusion+, ataxia+ NRNREEE, POW, SLE, but WNV IgM+NRLACVNRIgM + and PRNT confirmed JCV C[12]
2013,
1
Prodrome, rash, chills0.4LP+, MRI+,WNV, EEE, Lyme, Babesia microti (IgM+)<1.0LACNRSerum IgM+, PRNT 1:160P4[50]
2014,
2
Long pro-drome, HA, confused+, left hand numb+3.0LP+, MRI+, brain biopsy Serum WNV, EEE, POW and CSF WNV IgM, CSF EEE IgM3.0LACNRIgM+, PRNT 1:1280, both in CSFP4[50]
2014,
3
Long pro-drome, HA, confusedNo LPNoneWNV, SLE, EEE, POW10.0LACVPRNT+ at 1:160NRIgM+, PRNT 1:1280 in serumP4[50]
2014,
4
Prodrome, fever+, HANo LPNoneWNV, EEE0.4LACVPRNT+ at 1:160NRIgM+, PRNT 1:320 in serumP4[50]
2015,
5
Prodrome, HA, paresthesia
3.0LP+, MRI+ WNV, EEE, POW, and WNV3.0LACV1:20NRIgM+, PRNT 1:160P4[50]
2016,6Long pro-drome, HA, fatigue, myalgiasNRLP, MRI. WNV, EEE, POW, but Lyme IgM and Western blot IgG+NR NRNRIgM+, PRNT 1:80P1, P4[50]
2016,
7
HA, fever+, confused+0.9LP+, MRIWNV, POW<1.0 LACV1:40NRIgM+, PRNT 1:2560P4[50]
2017,
8
HA, confused, 2.5LP, CT, MRIWNV, POW, POW- in CSF2.5 LACNRIgM+, PRNT 1:160P4[50]
2017,
9
HA, confused+, seizure+0.1LP, MRI WNV, EEE, POW<1.0 LACNRIgM+, PRNT 1:160P4[50]
2014Prodrome, HA, fever, sepsis, rash mosquitoes, stiff neckNo LPCT pelvis and abdomen 19 serological tests 3.9LACV IgM negative, PRNT <1:10 to 1:320CSG JTC IgM negative, PRNT 1:160 rose to 1:10,240P4[60]
2015HA, fever+, confusion+0.7LP, MRI, EEGHSV, Bart, Borr, Coxac, Anaplas, autoimmune4.1IgM+, SSH rose 1:20 to 1:320CSG 4.1IgM+, JTC rose 1:40 to 1:320P4[68]
2016Prodrome, HA, seizure+0.7 LP, MRI, EEG+, brain biopsy+ Extensive infectious, autoimmune 0.9NR4.0Initial serology and later PRNT+P3[62]
2017Complex migraine-like HAs twice, also papilledema 0.2LP+, CT, CTA, EEG, MRI+ >15 micro-biology tests0.2SSH IgM+
serum and CSF, PRNT negative serum
NRIgM+ serum and CSF, and PRNT+ > 1:80 in serumC[67]
2017Prodrome, HA, fever+, Confused+, known liver transplant0.9LP+, auto-
immune Ab panel both CSF serum, MRI
>15 micro-biology tests, anti-body panel for viruses, mMGS0.9 LACV1:108.0CSF IgM+. PRNT in CSF 2 and 1:320 serumC[46]
201711-month prodrome, then rapid dementiaNRLP+, MRI, PET, EEG+, brain biopsy+ Auto-immune panel, >15 microbio-logy testsNRLACNRRT-PCR+, mNGS positiveC[4]
2018Prodrome, HA, ataxia+, diplopia, mosquitoes0.1LP+, CT, MRI+, EEG >15 micro-biology tests0.1LACV 1:20, SSH 1:20 both stable in later seraNRIgM+ and PRNT 1:2560 in CSF and serum C[56]
2018Confusion+,
Hallucinations, known heart transplant. Admission day 10
1.4LP+, CT, MRI, EEG, cardiac biopsies Autoimmune panel, >15 micro-biology tests, CSF encephalitis panel5.1 LACV6.6RT-PCR negative throughout, IgM+ serum and CSF, PRNT rose 2-fold in serum. IgM+ >7 months C[34]
2020Dysarthria+,
Confused+, mosquitoes
0.9LP+, MRI+ CSF BioFire array for VZV+, but 13 agents negative0.9LACV IgM and ELISA20.0CSF IgM+ and PRNT 1:512 in serumC[66]
2021Hallucinations+, HA, confusion+, mosquitoes, rash0.4LP+, CT, MRI+ CSG, WNV, SLE, EEE, WEE, LCEV, VDRL0.7NRNRIgM in serum and CSF, PRNT 1:160P3 [52]
2022L arm cramp+, aphasia0.6LP+, CT, CTA, MRI+, EEG+ Auto-immune, meningitis and tick panels, brain biopsy 1.6LACV + 1:1 serum, CSF negative NRCSF at biopsy site: JTC IgM+ and PRNT > 1:64C[59]
2022HA, diplopia+, confusion+0.1LP+, CT, MRI+, EEG+ CSF BioFire array, auto-immune panel1.3 NR>5.4JTV IgM+, PRNT 1:40 in serumC[32]
2022HA, fever+, stiff neck0.1LP, MRI+, meningitis panelautoimmune and micro panels0.1LACV3.9JTCV IgM+ and PRNT+ in CSFC[72]
2022seizure+0.1LP, MRI+, CSF shuntBrain biopsy, low level viremia from CMV and EBVNRNR, but LACV unlikely given where she lived.NRCSF JTC RT-PCR+, Serum JTC IgM+, PRNT 1:40C[61]
2022Fever+, confusion+0.7LP+, MRI+CSF POW IgM+, PRNT 2, serum IgM+, PRNT 1:1600.7NR5.0CSF JCV IgM +, PRNT 8, serum IgM+, PRNT 1:640C[49]
(a) Year of infection onset, numbered cases in case series. (b) Reported clinical symptoms. HA = headache. Prodrome = patient-reported symptoms that may or may not be relevant to later diagnosis. + if diagnosis was bolstered. (c) Lumbar puncture delay from after first clinical contact with author(s) of report. Day 1 of illness = authors’ estimates of the time of disease onset or date of first clinician contact or documented fever, new severe HA, new seizure, or other objective findings. NR if reported data insufficient; (d) Reported testing for possible infections. + if diagnosis was bolstered; F: complement fixation; CT = computed tomography scan of brain; CTA: Computed Tomography Angiography; IF = immuno-fluorescence; IgM = MAC-ELISA (antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) preceded by virus abbreviation if virus-specific; LP = lumbar puncture; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging of brain; PRNT = plaque reduction neutralization test; RT-PCR = reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; NR = not reported. (e) Serology tests other than for CSG viruses, + if positive; AFB: acid-fast bacilli; CMV: cytomegalovirus; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; EEEV: Eastern encephalitis virus; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HHV6: human herpes virus 6; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; HSV1: herpes simplex virus; meas: measles; MOGAD: myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease; mmp: mumps; NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; POW: Powassan virus; RMSF: Rocky Mountain spotted fever; RSV: respiratory syncytial virus; SLE: St. Louis encephalitis virus; VDRL: syphilis serology; VZV: varicella zoster virus; WEE: Western encephalitis virus; WNV: West Nile virus. (f) First clinical sample sent out that later made JCV etiology probable or confirmed, (g) CSG viruses tested for cross-reactivity with JTCV, + if positive, CEV = California encephalitis virus; JCV = Jamestown Canyon virus; KEYV = Keystone virus; LACV = La Crosse virus; SAV = San Angelo virus; SSHV = snowshoe hare virus; TAHV = Tahyna virus; TVTV = Trivitattus virus. HI: hemagglutination-inhibition; (h) weeks elapsed from JCV diagnostic sendoff until report sent to clinicians; (i) details of JCV results (j) Confirmed Reports (CR). Each case was analyzed to determine whether it was confirmed as a JCV case by CDC definition [59]. Probable cases were considered probable and not confirmed for one of four reasons: P1 = inadequate clinical detail for neuroinvasive and non-neuroinvasive disease or to exclude a more likely explanation of symptoms or no specification of type of clinician; P2 = JCV IgM positive, but PRNT unchanging; P3 = inadequate testing for other probable viral causes; P4 = inadequate testing by PRNT or IgM to exclude probable viral cross-reactive antibodies.
Table 3. JCV cases with complexity of being immune compromised or having other infections.
Table 3. JCV cases with complexity of being immune compromised or having other infections.
Year, Case aOther Infectious Agents bClinical Notes cLaboratory and Serology Results dNotes eRef
1980HSVEncephalitis,
recurrent HSV
JTCV PRNT 4-fold rise;
HSV 16-fold rise
HSV not detected in CSF
Recovered
[24]
1982, 10HSVEncephalitisJTCV PRNT, HI stable but IgM positiveHSV encephalitis?
Death
[10]
1997HSV?Prolonged encephalitis Slow 2-fold JCV PRNT rise. Low HSV titersRT-PCR positive for JCV in CSF and brain biopsy, disabled[26]
2011–2016WNVEncephalitisPRNT confirmed both viruses recentLimited details of case
Death
[12]
2013, 1Borrelia burgdorferiEncephalitisLyme IgM Western blot+
JCV IgM+ with PRNT 1:160
Poor memory, ataxia, depression[50]
2015SSHVEncephalitis, JTCV IgM+ and 8-fold PRNT rise, SSHV IgM+ and 16-fold PRNT riseCross-reactivity of viruses, long term symptoms[68]
2016, 7Borrelia burgdorferiRheumatoid arthritis (prednisone 10 mg daily).Engorged tick
JTCV IgM+ with PRNT 1:2560
Empirical Lyme treatment, previously on methotrexate
Ongoing fatigue
[50]
2017–2018-Rituximab for lymphoma,RT-PCR and mNGS positive at end of lifeOne year of progressive dementia Death[4]
2018EBVHeart transplant on tacrolimus and mycophenolate, encephalitisSerum JCV PRNT rose only 2-fold, but serum and CSF IgM favored JCV over EBV. RT-PCR for JCV was positive at 7.5 weeksRecovery after immune reconstitution and ribavirin
Recovered
[34]
2018–2023EBVTYK2 deficient, pneumonia, encephalitisCSF JCV IgM+ with PRNT 1:40Very complex case
Long term neurological impairment
[61]
2019VZVEncephalitis, L5 dermatome rash,CSF: VZV PCR+ and JCV IgM and PRNT 1:512Death[66]
2017-Liver transplant on cyclosporin and prednisone, encephalitisCSF IgM and serum PRNT 1:320Treated with IV IgG
Recovered
[46]
2022Borrelia burgdorferiErythema migrans and meningitisLyme serum IgM+, JCV CSF IgM and PRNT+Briefly hospitalized for antibiotics, recovered[72]
2022–2023POWEncephalitisCSF IgM and PRNT positive for POWV and JTCVRT-PCR and mNGS negative for both viruses, recovered[49]
(a) Year of infection onset, numbered cases in case series. (b) Identified potential co-infection or previous infective agent. EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; HSV: herpes simplex virus; POW: Powassan virus; SSHV = snowshoe hare virus; VZV: varicella zoster virus; WNV: West Nile virus. (c) Notable clinical notes. (d) Serology test results. (e) Notes on case.

3.5. Outcomes of JCV Encephalitis

We next evaluated the outcomes of JCV cases. Deaths occurred in 10 (2.4%) of the original 416 cases that included a diagnosis (Table S1). All deaths were associated with encephalitis, with death occurring in 6.5% of the 154 encephalitis cases. Of the detailed 49 case reports, 40 had clear reports of outcome (Table 1). Of these, there were four reported deaths related to JCV [4,10,12,66] and one death related to sepsis [62]. Prolonged impairment or recovery time of two months or more after JCV encephalitis was reported for 16 cases [26,32,49,50,52,58,61,68]. However, there were also 19 cases with short hospital stays and full recoveries within two months [10,42,55,56,58,67]. Thus, approximately half of the cases with clear reported outcomes had long-term consequences of JCV infection.

3.6. Confounding Factors of JCV Cases

We analyzed individual JCV cases for potential confounding factors that could have impacted the diagnosis, treatment, or outcome, including immune status and previous or co-infections (Table 3). Of the 49 case reports, five (10%) patients were immunocompromised, which included inherited immune deficiency, prednisone treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, rituximab therapy for lymphoma, or immunosuppression to prevent transplant rejection [4,34,46,50,61]. Analysis of the 49 detailed cases, as well as a report of 30 cases where enhanced surveillance for other pathogens was completed [12], identified positive tests or NAb titers for other infectious agents in 16 of 79 cases (19%). These agents included herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1), varicella zoster virus (VZV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), SSHV, WNV, Powassan virus (POWV), and Borrelia burgdorferi (Table 3). Not surprisingly, three of the immunocompromised cases had evidence of other infections besides JCV [34,50,61]. Of the 14 cases from Table 1 that had confounding factors of immunosuppression or pre/co-infection, the case outcomes were four deaths, four long-term neurological sequelae, and six recoveries. Thus, the rates of severe outcomes were higher in the cases with confounding factors but without a clear correlation with being immunocompromised or with any specific additional pathogen. However, confounding factors do appear to potentially have a negative impact on the outcome of JCV-related disease.

4. Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the reported cases of JCV over 40 years, from 1982 to 2022. Prolonged hospital stays and long-term impairment or recovery were commonly observed, with approximately 40% of cases reporting symptoms lasting 2 months or more. These outcomes correlate with comprehensive reviews of outcomes and longer-term impairment from other encephalitis viruses commonly found in North America, with discharged patients frequently having deficits in cognitive function such as memory loss or attention disorders [73]. For example, long-term symptoms are observed in 30–70% of patients with HSV-1 encephalitis, 30–50% of patients with varicella zoster virus (VZV), and up to 75% of patients with WNV neurological disease [73]. For patients hospitalized with LACV, 12% had clear neurological deficits at discharge, and 22% had cognitive and/or behavioral deficits at 10–18 months post release [74]. Long-term assessments of hospitalized children with LACV showed long-term neurobehavioral deficits in 19–54% of patients [75]. A direct comparison of JCV cases with these causes of viral encephalitis is difficult due to the low number of cases with JCV, as well as the differences in age between JCV and LACV patients. However, in all encephalitic viruses examined, at least one-third of cases reported impairment of over 2 months due to viral encephalitis. Thus, although many viruses such as JCV have low rates of mortality, they do consistently cause long-term consequences that can strongly impact quality of life. Better diagnosis and therapeutics that prevent neurological damage could be critical in increasing quality of life in these patients.
One of the surprising findings in this analysis was that the time from clinical onset to testing for JCV has not decreased over time (Figure 2). However, to recognize JCV infection early in the disease process, a clinician needs to recognize the acute encephalitis syndrome (AES) and have access to clinical laboratories that perform rapid, comprehensive analysis of serum and CSF for JCV. There may be many reasons why this window of time has not improved, but one reason may be the lack of specific, not just supportive, therapy, which makes a clear diagnosis less beneficial for the patient. Indeed, effective treatment for herpes simplex virus fostered more rapid specific diagnosis [69,76,77]. Thus, therapeutic breakthroughs for the treatment of encephalitic viruses such as JCV may not only improve the outcome of these patients but also reduce the percentage of viral encephalitis of unknown causes.
Another reason for the lack of improvement in time from clinical onset to diagnosis may be the diagnostic testing itself. Serological analysis of IgM and subsequent PRNT has remained the primary diagnostic test, with an increase in PRNT needed for confirmation. This is often difficult, as the results are received after the patient is discharged. RT-PCR testing could speed diagnosis and avoid problems of cross-reactivity of JCV [26]; however, RT-PCR does not always detect active infections [4,27,34,49,61]. Indeed, RT-PCR testing is currently recommended by the CDC only for patients who are immunocompromised, as these patients may have persistent viremia. However, routine analysis for JCV by the CDC JCV IgM ELISA has increased the number of cases [12], indicating that better diagnostics impact case detection. Further improvement of diagnostic tests and more widespread use may provide a more accurate understanding of JCV and other arbovirus cases in North America.
Due to the limited diagnostic tools over the last 40-year span, JCV cases are undoubtedly underreported, which can impact our understanding of the impact of individual viruses [78]. This may be truer for non-neurological JCV cases than neurological JCV cases. In an enhanced surveillance study with direct comparison of 15 neuroinvasive and 15 non-neuroinvasive JCV cases, the investigators found few early characteristics that differed between the neuroinvasive and non-neuroinvasive groups [12]. County-by-county maps of acute human JCV infections are based on data collected only since 2011 and thus cannot be correlated with historical infections. Surveillance funding for JCV cases was discontinued in the mid-1980s in upstate New York, which demonstrates the lack of information to estimate the distribution of current infections. Additionally, reported cases of JCV are often dependent on samples being sent by clinicians to state or federal labs for analysis [28,36,40,45,79,80,81,82,83], which can vary depending on funding for testing, awareness, and reporting criteria. Finally, the 49 detailed cases reported in the literature may have confounding factors that lead to more detailed reporting and may not be representative of average cases. Under-ascertainment and underreporting of infectious diseases can limit our understanding of the consequences of different pathogens on human disease [78]. Thus, the full impact of JCV infection on human health is underestimated and in need of further clinical attention.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v18020271/s1.

Author Contributions

S.F.J. conducted the online search for JCV cases, completed the analysis of JCV cases and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. K.E.P. assisted SJF in the analysis and in the writing and revisions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The contributions of the NIH authors were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Funding

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through AI001102-11.

Data Availability Statement

All data are listed or cited in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank John Portis, Clayton Winkler, Tyson Woods, Emily Kirby, Adrianne Glaser, and Rachel Feldman for their critical reading of the manuscript and Ryan Kissinger for creating the graphics in Figure 1. There was no input from funders in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Granerod, J.; Tam, C.C.; Crowcroft, N.S.; Davies, N.W.; Borchert, M.; Thomas, S.L. Challenge of the unknown. A systematic review of acute encephalitis in non-outbreak situations. Neurology 2010, 75, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Venkatesan, A.; Tunkel, A.R.; Bloch, K.C.; Lauring, A.S.; Sejvar, J.; Bitnun, A.; Stahl, J.P.; Mailles, A.; Drebot, M.; Rupprecht, C.E.; et al. Case definitions; diagnostic algorithms, and priorities in encephalitis: Consensus statement of the international encephalitis consortium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1114–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. George, B.P.; Schneider, E.B.; Venkatesan, A. Encephalitis hospitalization rates and inpatient mortality in the United States, 2000–2010. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Solomon, I.H.; Ganesh, V.S.; Yu, G.; Deng, X.D.; Wilson, M.R.; Miller, S.; Milligan, T.A.; Mukerji, S.S.; Mathewson, A.; Linxweiler, J.; et al. Fatal Case of Chronic Jamestown Canyon Virus Encephalitis Diagnosed by Metagenomic Sequencing in Patient Receiving Rituximab. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lyons, J.L.; Schaefer, P.W.; Cho, T.A.; Azar, M.M. Case 34-2017. A 76-Year-Old Man with Fever, Weight Loss, and Weakness. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1878–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meyer, H.M., Jr.; Johnson, R.T.; Crawford, I.P.; Dascomb, H.E.; Rogers, N.G. Central nervous system syndromes of “vital” etiology. A study of 713 cases. Am. J. Med. 1960, 29, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Piantadosi, A.; Kanjilal, S. Diagnostic Approach for Arboviral Infections in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e01926-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Samuels, M.A.; Gonzalez, R.G.; Makadzange, A.T.; Hedley-Whyte, E.T. Case 3-2017. A 62-Year-Old Man with Cardiac Sarcoidosis and New Diplopia and Weakness. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tyler, K.L. Acute Viral Encephalitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deibel, R.; Srihongse, S.; Grayson, M.A.; Grimstad, P.R.; Mahdy, M.S.; Artsob, H.; Calisher, C.H. Jamestown Canyon virus: The etiologic agent of an emerging human disease? Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1983, 123, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Drebot, M.A. Emerging mosquito-borne bunyaviruses in Canada. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2015, 41, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matkovic, E.; Johnson, D.K.H.; Staples, J.E.; Mora-Pinzon, M.C.; Elbadawi, L.I.; Osborn, R.A.; Warshauer, D.M.; Wegner, M.V.; Davis, J.P. Enhanced Arboviral Surveillance to Increase Detection of Jamestown Canyon Virus Infections, Wisconsin, 2011–2016. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 100, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pastula, D.M.; Smith, D.E.; Beckham, J.D.; Tyler, K.L. Four emerging arboviral diseases in North America: Jamestown Canyon, Powassan, chikungunya, and Zika virus diseases. J. Neurovirol 2016, 22, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. DeFoliart, G.R.; Anslow, R.O.; Hanson, R.P.; Morris, C.D.; Papadopoulos, O.; Sather, G.E. Isolation of Jamestown Canyon serotype of California encephalitis virus from naturally infected Aedes mosquitoes and tabanids. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1969, 18, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sather, G.E.; Hammon, W.M. Antigenic patterns within the California-encephalitis-virus group. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1967, 16, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kosoy, O.; Rabe, I.; Geissler, A.; Adjemian, J.; Panella, A.; Laven, J.; Basile, A.J.; Velez, J.; Griffith, K.; Wong, D.; et al. Serological Survey for Antibodies to Mosquito-Borne Bunyaviruses Among US National Park Service and US Forest Service Employees. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016, 16, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mayo, D.N.; Karabatsos, N.; Scarano, F.J.; Brennan, T.; Buck, D.; Fiorentino, T.; Mennone, J.; Tran, S. Jamestown Canyon virus: Seroprevalence in Connecticut. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 911–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shepard, J.J.; Armstrong, P.M. Jamestown Canyon virus comes into view: Understanding the threat from an underrecognized arbovirus. J. Med. Entomol. 2023, 60, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Snyman, J.; Villeneuve, C.A.; Snyman, L.P.; Martinez, V.; Dusfour, I.; Lecomte, N.; Jenkins, E.J.; Hobman, T.C.; Leighton, P.A.; Kumar, A. First Confirmed Report of Jamestown Canyon Virus in Greenland. J. Med. Virol. 2024, 96, e70064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Walters, L.L.; Tirrell, S.J.; Shope, R.E. Seroepidemiology of California and Bunyamwera serogroup (Bunyaviridae) virus infections in native populations of Alaska. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1999, 60, 806–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woods, T.A.; Johnson, S.F.; Evans, A.B.; Peterson, K.E. Neutralizing Antibodies against California Serogroup Orthobunyaviruses in Human Serum Samples, Montana, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2025, 31, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grimstad, P.R.; Calisher, C.H.; Harroff, R.N.; Wentworth, B.B. Jamestown Canyon virus (California serogroup) is the etiologic agent of widespread infection in Michigan humans. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1986, 35, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patriquin, G.M.; Drebot, M.; Cole, T.; Lindsay, R.; Schleihauf, E.; Johnston, B.L.; Dimitrova, K.; Traykova-Andonova, M.; Mask, A.; Haldane, D.; et al. High Seroprevalence of Jamestown Canyon Virus among Deer and Humans, Nova Scotia, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Grimstad, P.R.; Shabino, C.L.; Calisher, C.H.; Waldman, R.J. A case of encephalitis in a human associated with a serologic rise to Jamestown Canyon virus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1982, 31, 1238–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Srihongse, S.; Grayson, M.A.; Deibel, R. California serogroup viruses in New York State: The role of subtypes in human infections. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1984, 33, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, C.W.; Campbell, W.; Grady, L.; Kirouac, I.; LaForce, F.M. Diagnosis of Jamestown Canyon encephalitis by polymerase chain reaction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 28, 1294–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pastula, D.M.; Johnson, D.K.H.; White, J.L.; Dupuis, A.P., 2nd; Fischer, M.; Staples, J.E. Jamestown Canyon Virus Disease in the United States—2000–2013. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Public Health Agency of Canada. West Nile virus and other mosquito-borne diseases surveillance report: Annual edition 2019. In Disease and Conditions; Public Health Agency of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. Centers for Disease Control. Leads from the MMWR. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1984. JAMA 1985, 253, 3231–3233. [Google Scholar]
  30. Centers for Disease Control. Leads from the MMWR. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1987. JAMA 1988, 260, 1688–1689+1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Centers for Disease Control. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1996–1997. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 1998, 24, 156–159. [Google Scholar]
  32. Abud, A.M.; Rizvi, S.; Zainah, H.; O’Brien, T.C.; Villamar, M.F. Aggressive MOGAD with bilateral corticospinal tract lesions following infection with Jamestown Canyon virus. J. Neuroimmunol. 2022, 373, 577997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Artsob, H.; Spence, L.P.; Calisher, C.H.; Sekla, L.H.; Brust, R.A. Isolation of California encephalitis serotype from mosquitoes collected in Manitoba, Canada. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1985, 1, 257–258. [Google Scholar]
  34. Askar, W.P.; Menaria, P.; Thohan, V.; Brummitt, C.F. Jamestown Canyon virus encephalitis in a heart transplant patient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burakoff, A.; Lehman, J.; Fischer, M.; Staples, J.E.; Lindsey, N.P. West Nile Virus and Other Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Centers for Disease Control. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1984. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1985, 34, 283–286+291–294. [Google Scholar]
  37. Centers for Disease Control. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1985. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1986, 35, 341–344+349–350. [Google Scholar]
  38. Centers for Disease Control. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1986. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1987, 36, 450–455. [Google Scholar]
  39. Centers for Disease Control. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1987. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1988, 37, 506–508+513–515. [Google Scholar]
  40. Centers for Disease Control. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1989. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1990, 39, 407+413–417. [Google Scholar]
  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Arboviral infections of the central nervous system—United States, 1996–1997. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1998, 47, 517–522. [Google Scholar]
  42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human Jamestown canyon virus infection—Montana, 2009. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2011, 60, 652–655. [Google Scholar]
  43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. West Nile virus disease and other arboviral diseases—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2011, 60, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar]
  44. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. West nile virus disease and other arboviral diseases—United States, 2011. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2012, 61, 510–514. [Google Scholar]
  45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. West Nile virus and other arboviral diseases—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2013, 62, 513–517. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ciccone, E.J.; Markmann, A.J.; Srinivas, M.L.; Levinson, K.J.; Miller, M.B.; van Duin, D.; Gay, C.L. Encephalitis Caused by Jamestown Canyon Virus in a Liver Transplant Patient, North Carolina, USA, 2017. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Curren, E.J.; Lehman, J.; Kolsin, J.; Walker, W.L.; Martin, S.W.; Staples, J.E.; Hills, S.L.; Gould, C.V.; Rabe, I.B.; Fischer, M.; et al. West Nile Virus and Other Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fagre, A.C.; Lyons, S.; Staples, J.E.; Lindsey, N. West Nile Virus and Other Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2023, 72, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gnanaprakasam, R.; Wormser, G.P.; Keller, M. Background seropositivity to Jamestown Canyon virus can lead to diagnostic confusion. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2024, 108, 116161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kinsella, C.M.; Paras, M.L.; Smole, S.; Mehta, S.; Ganesh, V.; Chen, L.H.; McQuillen, D.P.; Shah, R.; Chan, J.; Osborne, M. Jamestown Canyon virus in Massachusetts: Clinical case series and vector screening. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Krow-Lucal, E.; Lindsey, N.P.; Lehman, J.; Fischer, M.; Staples, J.E. West Nile Virus and Other Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kumar, D.; Hans, A.; Warsha, F.; Helmstetter, N. Jamestown Canyon virus-mediated meningoencephalitis with unusual laboratory findings. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e242014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lindsey, N.P.; Lehman, J.A.; Staples, J.E.; Fischer, M. West Nile Virus and Other Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2015, 64, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lindsey, N.P.; Lehman, J.A.; Staples, J.E.; Fischer, M. West Nile virus and other arboviral diseases—United States, 2013. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2014, 63, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Madigan, T.; Ryan, C.S.; Huskins, W.C.; Theel, E.S.; Pritt, B.S.; Palm, J.; Schiffman, E.; Strain, A.K.; Binnicker, M.J. Closing the Brief Case: A 10-Year-Old Girl with Meningoencephalitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00255-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Madigan, M.; Ryan, C.S.; Huskins, W.C.; Theel, E.S.; Pritt, B.S.; Palm, J.; Schiffman, E.; Strain, A.K.; Binnicker, M.J. The Brief Case: A 10-Year-Old Girl with Meningoencephalitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00254-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. McDonald, E.; Martin, S.W.; Landry, K.; Gould, C.V.; Lehman, J.; Fischer, M.; Lindsey, N.P. West Nile Virus and Other Domestic Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019, 68, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Meier-Stephenson, V.; Drebot, M.A.; Dimitrova, K.; DiQuinzio, M.; Fonseca, K.; Forrest, D.; Hatchette, T.; Morshed, M.; Patriquin, G.; Poliquin, G.; et al. Case Series of Jamestown Canyon Virus Infections with Neurologic Outcomes, Canada, 2011–2016. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2024, 30, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rameez, F.; Walsh, M.; Wees, N.; Ali, R.; Min, J.; Tank, E.; Khan, M. Jamestown Canyon Virus (JCV) Encephalitis Mimicking Acute Stroke in Michigan: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Neurohospitalist 2022, 12, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rogstad, D.K.; Schiffman, E.; Neitzel, D.; Baddour, L.M. Severe Sepsis Caused by California Serogroup Orthobunyavirus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21, 1876–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Roussel, L.; Pham-Huy, A.; Yu, A.C.; Venkateswaran, S.; Perez, A.; Bourdel, G.; Sun, Y.; Villavicencio, S.T.; Bernier, S.; Li, Y.; et al. A Novel Homozygous Mutation Causing Complete TYK2 Deficiency, with Severe Respiratory Viral Infections, EBV-Driven Lymphoma, and Jamestown Canyon Viral Encephalitis. J. Clin. Immunol. 2023, 43, 2011–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Savard, M.; Paradis, A.; Francoeur, C.L. Jamestown Canyon encephalitis with NORSE and electrographic response to ribavirin: A case report. Epilepsia Open 2018, 3, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Soto, R.A.; Hughes, M.L.; Staples, J.E.; Lindsey, N.P. West Nile Virus and Other Domestic Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sutter, R.A.; Lyons, S.; Gould, C.V.; Staples, J.E.; Lindsey, N.P. West Nile Virus and Other Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2024, 73, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Vahey, G.M.; Mathis, S.; Martin, S.W.; Gould, C.V.; Staples, J.E.; Lindsey, N.P. West Nile Virus and Other Domestic Nationally Notifiable Arboviral Diseases—United States, 2019. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1069–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. VanderVeen, N.; Nguyen, N.; Hoang, K.; Parviz, J.; Khan, T.; Zhen, A.; Jagger, B.W. Encephalitis with coinfection by Jamestown canyon virus (JCV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV). IDCases 2020, 22, e00966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vosoughi, R.; Walkty, A.; Drebot, M.A.; Kadkhoda, K. Jamestown Canyon virus meningoencephalitis mimicking migraine with aura in a resident of Manitoba. Can. Med Assoc. J. 2018, 190, E262–E264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Webster, D.; Dimitrova, K.; Holloway, K.; Makowski, K.; Safronetz, D.; Drebot, M.A. California Serogroup Virus Infection Associated with Encephalitis and Cognitive Decline, Canada, 2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1423–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Weiler, N.S.; Niendorf, E.; Dumic; Insects, I.T.; Bites, T. One Patient: A Lyme Disease and Jamestown Canyon Co-infection. Cureus 2023, 15, e40222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Backman, R.; Foy, R.; Diggle, P.J.; Kneen, R.; Easton, A.; Defres, S.; McGill, F.; Michael, B.D.; Solomon, T.; Committee, E.U.P.S. A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of a tailored intervention to improve the initial management of suspected encephalitis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Artsob, H.; Spence, L.; Sekla, L. Arbovirus activity in Canada in 1984. Can. Med Assoc. J. 1985, 133, 1026. [Google Scholar]
  72. Nelson, R.; Wilcox, L.; Brennan, B.A.; Mayo, D. Surveillance for Arbovirus Infections. In Connecticut Epidemiologist; Connecticut Department of Public Health: Hartford, CT, USA, 2002; pp. 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kvam, K.A.; Stahl, J.P.; Chow, F.C.; Soldatos, A.; Tattevin, P.; Sejvar, J.; Mailles, A. Outcome and Sequelae of Infectious Encephalitis. J. Clin. Neurol. 2024, 20, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McJunkin, J.E.; de los Reyes, E.C.; Irazuzta, J.E.; Caceres, M.J.; Khan, R.R.; Minnich, L.L.; Fu, K.D.; Lovett, G.D.; Tsai, T.; Thompson, A. La Crosse encephalitis in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Boutzoukas, A.E.; Freedman, D.A.; Koterba, C.; Hunt, G.W.; Mack, K.; Cass, J.; Yildiz, V.O.; de los Reyes, E.; Twanow, J.; Chung, M.G.; et al. La Crosse Virus Neuroinvasive Disease in Children: A Contemporary Analysis of Clinical/Neurobehavioral Outcomes and Predictors of Disease Severity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 76, e1114–e1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Abbuehl, L.S.; Hofmann, E.; Hakim, A.; Dietmann, A. Can we forecast poor outcome in herpes simplex and varicella zoster encephalitis? A narrative review. Front. Neurol. 2023, 14, 1130090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Whitley, J. Effectiveness of small-group self-instruction in radiographic anatomy. Investig. Radiol. 1977, 12, 486–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gibbons, C.L.; Mangen, M.J.; Plass, D.; Havelaar, A.H.; Brooke, R.J.; Kramarz, P.; Peterson, K.L.; Stuurman, A.L.; Cassini, A.; Fevre, E.M.; et al. Measuring underreporting and under-ascertainment in infectious disease datasets: A comparison of methods. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Public Health Agency of Canada. West Nile Virus And Other Mosquito-Borne Disease Surveillance Report Final Surveillance Report, 2015. In Diseases and Conditions; Government of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  80. Public Health Agency of Canada. 2016—Final—Summary West Nile Virus in Canada. In West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-Borne Disease National Surveillance Report; Public Health Agency of Canada, Ed.; Government of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  81. Public Health Agency of Canada. Annual national surveillance report—2017. In West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Canada; Government of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2018; Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/west-nile-virus-surveillance/2017/annual-national-surveillance-report.html (accessed on 10 February 2026).
  82. Schneider, E.F.; Robich, R.M.; Elias, S.P.; Lubelczyk, C.B.; Cosenza, D.S.; Smith, R.P. Jamestown Canyon Virus in Collected Mosquitoes, Maine, United States, 2017–2019. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 2330–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Public Health Agency of Canada. West Nile virus and other mosquito-borne diseases surveillance report: Annual edition (2018). In Disease and Conditions; Government of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2019; Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/west-nile-virus-other-mosquito-borne-diseases-surveillance-annual-report-2018.html (accessed on 10 February 2026).
Figure 1. Number and location of JCV cases in Canada and the USA from 2000 to 2022. (A) Number of reported cases of JCV illnesses in the USA (orange) and Canada (blue) per year per CDC and CNML reports (described in Table S1). (B) States and provinces with at least one case of JCV illness between 2000 and 2022. All Canadian provinces reported at least one case within this time frame.
Figure 1. Number and location of JCV cases in Canada and the USA from 2000 to 2022. (A) Number of reported cases of JCV illnesses in the USA (orange) and Canada (blue) per year per CDC and CNML reports (described in Table S1). (B) States and provinces with at least one case of JCV illness between 2000 and 2022. All Canadian provinces reported at least one case within this time frame.
Viruses 18 00271 g001
Figure 2. Awareness interval time (ATI) and CSF time interval (CTI) for JCV cases. (A) Time in weeks from report of initial symptoms until samples were sent off for analysis for JCV infection (IgM or neutralizing antibodies). ATI was determined from 41 cases that contained this information and plotted versus the case year. Linear regression analysis found an R squared value of 0.012 and no significant deviation from 0. (B) The time from report of initial symptoms to lumbar puncture being taken (CTI) for analysis was determined for 34 cases and plotted versus case year. Linear regression analysis found an R squared value of 0.002 and no significant deviation from 0. (C) Comparison of ATI and CTI for 32 cases with both information provided. Colored symbols are outliers and are explained under Section 3.4. A linear regression indicated an R value of 0.10 and no significant deviation from 0, indicating that the two values were not directly linked.
Figure 2. Awareness interval time (ATI) and CSF time interval (CTI) for JCV cases. (A) Time in weeks from report of initial symptoms until samples were sent off for analysis for JCV infection (IgM or neutralizing antibodies). ATI was determined from 41 cases that contained this information and plotted versus the case year. Linear regression analysis found an R squared value of 0.012 and no significant deviation from 0. (B) The time from report of initial symptoms to lumbar puncture being taken (CTI) for analysis was determined for 34 cases and plotted versus case year. Linear regression analysis found an R squared value of 0.002 and no significant deviation from 0. (C) Comparison of ATI and CTI for 32 cases with both information provided. Colored symbols are outliers and are explained under Section 3.4. A linear regression indicated an R value of 0.10 and no significant deviation from 0, indicating that the two values were not directly linked.
Viruses 18 00271 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Johnson, S.F.; Peterson, K.E. Jamestown Canyon Virus Disease: An Analytic Review of Human Cases Reported from 1982 Through 2022. Viruses 2026, 18, 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020271

AMA Style

Johnson SF, Peterson KE. Jamestown Canyon Virus Disease: An Analytic Review of Human Cases Reported from 1982 Through 2022. Viruses. 2026; 18(2):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Johnson, Stephen F., and Karin E. Peterson. 2026. "Jamestown Canyon Virus Disease: An Analytic Review of Human Cases Reported from 1982 Through 2022" Viruses 18, no. 2: 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020271

APA Style

Johnson, S. F., & Peterson, K. E. (2026). Jamestown Canyon Virus Disease: An Analytic Review of Human Cases Reported from 1982 Through 2022. Viruses, 18(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop