Next Article in Journal
Predicted Structures of Ceduovirus Adhesion Devices Highlight Unique Architectures Reminiscent of Bacterial Secretion System VI
Previous Article in Journal
Structural and Functional Characterization of Porcine Adeno-Associated Viruses
 
 
viruses-logo
Article Menu

Article Menu

Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Detection of Yellow Fever Virus in Haemagogus janthinomys Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Rural Settlement in the State of Pará, Brazilian Amazon, 2024

by
Joaquim Pinto Nunes Neto
1,2,*,
Daniel Damous Dias
1,2,
Bruna Laís Sena do Nascimento
1,
Sandro Patroca da Silva
1,
Sâmia Luzia Sena da Silva
1,
Lúcia Aline Moura Reis
3,
Hanna Carolina Farias Reis
1,
Fábio Silva da Silva
1,2,
Lucas Henrique da Silva e Silva
1,2,
Durval Bertram Rodrigues Vieira
1,
Roberto Carlos Feitosa Brandão
1,
Wallace Oliveira Rosário
1,
Francisco Amilton dos Santos Paiva
1,
José Wilson Rosa Júnior
1,
Bruno Tardelli Diniz Nunes
1,
Lívia Carício Martins
1,
Lívia Medeiros Neves Casseb
1 and
Ana Cecília Ribeiro Cruz
1,2
1
Department of Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers, Evandro Chagas Institute, Secretariat of Health and Environment Surveillance, Ministry of Health, Ananindeua 67030-000, PA, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Parasitary Biology in the Amazon, Center of Biological and Health Sciences, State University of Pará, Belém 66095-663, PA, Brazil
3
Faculty of Nursing, Federal and Rural University of Amazon, Parauapebas 68515-000, PA, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2025, 17(9), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091258
Submission received: 16 August 2025 / Revised: 12 September 2025 / Accepted: 14 September 2025 / Published: 18 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)

Abstract

Yellow fever (YF) is an acute and potentially fatal hemorrhagic disease caused by the Yellow Fever virus (YFV), endemic to sub-Saharan Africa and several tropical countries, including Brazil. In Brazil, the Amazon region is considered the main endemic area. YFV is maintained in a sylvatic cycle involving Neotropical primates and mosquitoes of the genera Haemagogus and Sabethes, acting as primary and secondary vectors, respectively. In March 2024, entomovirological surveillance was conducted in Santa Bárbara do Pará, Pará, Brazil. A total of 286 mosquitoes were collected, classified into 13 species across nine genera, and grouped into 33 pools. Seventeen pools were tested by RT-qPCR for Orthoflavivirus (YFV, DENV, WNV, SLEV), Alphavirus (CHIKV, MAYV), and Orthobunyavirus (OROV). YFV was detected in four Haemagogus janthinomys pools, with Ct values ranging from 22.2 to 27.9. Metagenomic sequencing confirmed the presence of YFV with assigned reads and >99% protein identity. Notably, the detection occurred without human cases or primate deaths, enabling timely vaccination of the local population. These findings confirm YFV circulation in forested areas of the Belém metropolitan region and reaffirm Hg. janthinomys as a key vector. Our study reinforces the relevance of early entomovirological surveillance and preventive strategies, such as vaccination, to mitigate yellow fever reemergence.

1. Introduction

Yellow fever (YF) is a viral vector-borne disease that causes an acute and potentially fatal hemorrhagic fever, with significant impact on public health [1,2]. It occurs in sub-Saharan Africa and in several tropical and subtropical countries in South America, including Brazil. Despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine, it still remains a major public health concern in these regions, where epidemic outbreaks occur intermittently [3,4].
YF is caused by Orthoflavivirus flavi, an enveloped virus with a positive-sense, single-stranded, non-segmented RNA genome, classified into the genus Orthoflavivirus, family Flaviviridae [1]. In the Americas, YF transmission occurs through two distinct epidemiological cycles: sylvatic and urban. In both cycles, the disease is identical in clinical, immunological, and pathophysiological aspects [5]. In the sylvatic cycle, non-human primates, particularly those of the genera Allouata Lacépède, Ateles Linnaeus, Callithrix Linnaeus, and Cebus Erxleben [6,7,8], act as the main amplifying hosts of the virus, while mosquito species of the genera Haemagogus Williston and Sabethes Robineau-Desvoidy serve as primary and secondary vectors, respectively [9,10,11]. Human infection is accidental and occurs when unvaccinated individuals living in or entering forested areas for extractive or recreational activities are bitten by infected mosquitoes. In the urban cycle, viremic humans infected in forested areas may return to urban environments and serve as a source of infection for anthropophilic mosquitoes such as Aedes aegypti. Although urban cases have not been reported in the Americas since 1954, they remain common in several African countries [4].
In Brazil, the introduction of the 17D vaccine in the late 1930s, combined with mosquito eradication campaigns targeting Aedes aegypti, led to a dramatic decline in urban YF cases and the eventual elimination of this transmission cycle [5,12,13]. The last recorded urban cases occurred in 1942, in the municipality of Sena Madureira, in the state of Acre. Despite this, sylvatic YF continued to occur in endemic areas of the Amazon region. However, starting in 1999, a concerning shift in the distribution pattern of the disease was observed. For the first time, the majority of human cases and non-human primates were reported outside the Amazon basin, affecting states in the Central-West, Southeast, and South of the country [5,14,15,16]. These outbreaks occurred in areas near regions with high infestation levels of the urban vector Aedes aegypti and the potential vector Aedes albopictus, close to large, densely populated metropolitan centers. These areas were also characterized by low vaccination coverage [17].
In recent decades, the dynamics of YF in Brazil have raised concerns among public health authorities, prompting discussions about the risk of reestablishment of urban transmission in the country [18,19,20,21]. In this context, the individuals most susceptible to contracting the disease are those who are unvaccinated and exposed to infected vectors in endemic areas with active viral circulation, particularly in forested and rural environments [9]. It is important to highlight that, although the Amazon region is characterized by irregular and sporadic patterns of YF cases usually associated with self-limited outbreaks and epidemics [21] it holds great epidemiological importance as the natural reservoir of the disease in Brazil. Historically, the region has been the origin of outbreak waves that spread to other parts of the country, including the South and Southeast [22,23].
In this context, entomovirological surveillance stands out as an essential tool for the early detection of viral circulation and the identification of areas with transmission potential, based on the occurrence of epizootics in non-human primates, suspected human cases, and the identification of potential vector species. Such actions are fundamental for predicting and stratifying the risk of yellow fever emergence, thereby supporting the formulation of effective control and prevention measures [24,25,26].
Considering the relevance of the Amazon region as one of the largest arbovirus reservoirs on the planet [27], and particularly as the primary endemic reservoir of YFV in Brazil [23], this scenario highlights the region’s vulnerability to arboviral emergencies. The study area, for instance, has a concerning history of arbovirus outbreaks. In 2008, an outbreak of Alphavirus mayaro (MAYV) was recorded with 36 confirmed cases, with Hg. janthinomys identified as the main vector involved in transmission [28]. A decade later, in 2018, another episode affected 94 individuals, with a predominance of Orthobunyavirus oropoucheense (OROV) infections, although cases of MAYV and Alphavirus chikungunya (CHIKV) were also reported [29]. In this context, it is imperative to carry out and disseminate official records of viral detections, as well as the identification of the mosquito species involved. The data presented in this study contribute to a better understanding of the geographical distribution of YFV in the Amazon region and to the improvement of prevention strategies, including the expansion of vaccination coverage.
This study reports the molecular detection of yellow fever virus (Orthoflavivirus flavi) in pools of Haemagogus janthinomys mosquitoes collected from a rural area in the metropolitan region of Belém, the capital of the state of Pará, in the Brazilian Amazon, during entomovirological investigations conducted in March 2024.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was conducted at the “Expedito Ribeiro” Agroecological Rural Workers Settlement, located at coordinates 1°12′29.73″ S and 48°16′25.25″ W (Figure 1), in the municipality of Santa Bárbara do Pará, State of Pará, Brazilian Amazon, between 19 and 21 March 2024. The research was carried out under authorization granted by the Biodiversity Authorization and Information System of the Ministry of the Environment (SISBIO/IBAMA), permit no. 56504-6. The settlement covers approximately 600 hectares, of which 80% are designated as legal forest reserve. Local residents rely economically on agricultural production, small-scale livestock farming, and beekeeping.
The region’s climate is classified as hot and humid tropical, with significant rainfall throughout most of the year. According to the Köppen–Geiger classification, it falls into the Am category. The annual average temperature is 26.4 °C, with a relative humidity of 85%, and total annual precipitation reaches approximately 2.624 mm. The rainy season extends from December to May, while lower precipitation levels are observed between July and November (https://en.climate-data.org/, accessed on 8 June 2025).

2.2. Mosquito Sampling and Taxonomic Identification

Sampling was conducted simultaneously in two forest strata: at ground level and in the forest canopy, approximately 12 m high. A single collector was positioned in the canopy, while two others operated at ground level. Mosquitoes were collected using the protected human attraction technique [30], with the aid of small entomological nets and oral aspirators. Specimens were then transferred to cryogenic tubes and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen at −196 °C, and transported to the Department of Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers of the Evandro Chagas Institute (SEARB/IEC/SVSA/MS), where they were stored at −70 °C until taxonomic identification.
At the Medical Entomology Laboratory (SEARB/IEC), specimens were identified based on external morphology using the dichotomous key proposed by Forattini [31], with the aid of a Zeiss Stemi 2000-C stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) on a cold table (Eletrohospitalar, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil) maintained at approximately −38 °C. Genus and subgenus abbreviations followed the conventions proposed by Reinert [32]. After identification, specimens were grouped into pools containing 1 up to 33 individuals, according to species, genera (female and male), collection site, strata and date. Each pool received a unique alphanumeric code beginning with “AR” (for ARthropod samples), followed by sequential numbers.

2.3. Mosquito Homogenization and Viral RNA Extraction

Pools containing the entire bodies of the insects were homogenized in 1 mL of Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 2% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA), and 1% amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA), along with a 5 mm tungsten bead (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The pools were then macerated by agitation in a Tissuelyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at a frequency of 25 Hz for 1 min and stored at −70 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were thawed and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and 140 μL of the supernatant was collected for total RNA extraction and purification using the QIAamp Viral RNA® Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) Assay

The one-step real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay was performed using the SuperScript® III Platinum® One-Step qRT-PCR Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The test for Orthoflavivirus denguei (DENV) was carried out as a single-tube multiplex assay capable of detecting all four virus serotypes. Assays for YFV, Orthoflavivirus nilense (WNV), Orthoflavivirus louisense (SLEV), Alphavirus chikungunya (CHIKV), Alphavirus mayaro (MAYV), and Oropouche orthobunyavirus (OROV) were conducted in duplicate as singleplex reactions. Each run included positive and negative controls, as well as a Non-Template Control (NTC), to validate the reactions. Amplifications were carried out on an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Thermal cycling conditions for the RT-qPCR assays were as follows: reverse transcription at 50 °C for 30 min; initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min; followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C.
Virus detection was based on specific primers and probes according to previously established protocols: YFV as described by Fischer et al. [33]; DENV according to Santiago et al. [34]; SLEV per Lanciotti and Kerst [35]; WNV following Lanciotti et al. [36]; CHIKV as described by Lanciotti [37]; and MAYV and OROV according to Naveca et al. [38].
Samples were considered positive when the average cycle threshold (Ct) value was ≤37 for YFV and DENV, and ≤38 for WNV, SLEV, CHIKV, MAYV, and OROV. None of the positive pools in this study exhibited late amplification. The RT-qPCR protocol employed was validated by the Brazilian National Reference Laboratory for Arbovirus Diagnostics (SEARB/IEC) and has a reported limit of detection ranging from 4.0 to 8.8 RNA copies per reaction [33]. The Ct cut-off was determined using quantified samples at the Limit of Detection (LoD) concentration, tested in 95 replicate reactions. It was defined as the mean Ct plus one standard deviation (≈38). Samples with Ct values >38 were considered negative, while those between 35 and 38 were re-tested using a doubled input volume; a reduction of ≥1 Ct confirmed positivity.
Viral RNA loads in the positive samples were estimated using a standard curve generated from a YFV-positive sample previously quantified by RT-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), ranging from 6.22 × 102 to 2.67 × 104 RNA copies per reaction.

2.5. Metagenomic Sequencing

2.5.1. Library Preparation and Sequencing

Only virus-positive samples confirmed by RT-qPCR were selected for sequencing. Extracted RNA from these samples was used for first- and second-strand cDNA synthesis using the SuperScript™ VILO™ MasterMix Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the NEBNext mRNA Second Strand Synthesis Module (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Subsequently, cDNA libraries were constructed following the protocol of the SureSelectQXT Whole Genome Library Prep Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Library quantification was performed using a Qubit® 4.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA), while quality assessment was carried out with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sequencing step was performed on the NextSeq 550 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in paired-end mode using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 cycles).

2.5.2. Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw sequence data were subjected to quality control using Fastp v.0.23.0 [39], configured to remove adapter sequences and reads with a Phred quality score below Q20. After this step, the reads were submitted to De novo genome assembly using MEGAHIT v.1.2.9 [40] with multiple k-mer sizes (21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 99, and 141). Taxonomic classification was performed at two levels: (i) on the processed reads and (ii) on the assembled contigs, using Kraken 2 v.2.1.2 [41] with the Core_nt database (https://benlangmead.github.io/aws-indexes/k2, accessed on 7 June 2025). The results were inspected using the online Pavian Metagenomics Data Explorer (https://fbreitwieser.shinyapps.io/pavian/, accessed on 7 June 2025) where identification and quantification of viral reads were carried out. Subsequently, assembled contigs were grouped and mapped to the YFV reference genome (GenBank accession: NC_002031) using Bowtie2 [42]. The resulting alignment files were processed with Samtools v.1.21 [43] to convert file formats and generate a consensus sequence. Finally, the consensus sequence was submitted to BLASTX (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 7 May 2025) for sequence similarity analysis against the non-redundant (nr) database.

3. Results

A total of 286 mosquito specimens belonging to 13 species across nine genera were collected. The majority of specimens were recorded at the ground level, totaling 228 individuals (79.7%), while the canopy accounted for 58 individuals (20.3%) (Table 1).
The most abundant species were Haemagogus (Haemagogus) janthinomys with 77 individuals (26.9%), Limatus flavisetosus (n = 67; 23.4%), Wyeomyia sp. (n = 54; 18.9%), Aedes (Ochlerotatus) serratus (n = 26; 9.1%), and Psorophora (Janthinosoma) ferox (n = 18; 6.3%). Together, these species represented 84.6% of the total mosquitoes collected. The most frequently collected species, Hg. janthinomys was collected in both forest strata, being more abundant in the canopy (n = 47) than at ground level (n = 30). The ground-level fauna exhibited greater species richness and abundance, including 12 taxa found exclusively in this stratum, such as Ae. (Howardina) fulvithorax, Ae. (Och.) scapularis, Ae. (Protomacleaya) argyrothorax, Li. durhamii, and Trichoprosopon sp. In contrast, only three taxa were recorded exclusively in the canopy: Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus (n = 1), Sabethes (Sabethoides) chloropterus (n = 7), and Sa. (Sbo.) glaucodaemon (n = 2).
Of the 33 pools formed, 17 were selected for RT-qPCR screening based on their composition of species with recognized medical importance and well-established roles in the transmission of the arboviruses under investigation, as well as the availability of standardized protocols for testing arthropod samples (Table 2).
Among the pools tested, yellow fever virus (YFV) was the only virus detected, found in all four Hg. janthinomys pools, with cycle threshold (Ct) values ranging from 22.2 to 27.9. The lowest Ct value (22.2), indicating the highest viral load, was observed in a pool composed of 27 individuals collected from the canopy (Supplementary Material S1).
Three Hg. janthinomys pools that tested positive for YFV in the RT-qPCR assay were subjected to metagenomic sequencing. A total of 110,939,520 paired-end reads were obtained, of which 107,580,006 were retained after quality control (Table 3). Sample AR888786 was not included in the sequencing process because technical issues occurred during library preparation, which prevented the generation of data with sufficient quality for downstream analyses.
The taxonomic analysis of the reads revealed variation in viral sequence abundance among the analyzed samples (Table 3). Sample AR888776 yielded 50,390 viral reads, of which 54 were assigned to YFV. Samples AR888787 and AR888788 showed 37,007 (12 YFV) and 38,178 reads (3 YFV), respectively. In AR888787, seven contigs ranging from 308 to 560 nucleotides in length were partially assembled and aligned in scattered regions of the YFV reference genome (GenBank accession: NC_002031). In AR888776, five longer partial contigs (368–1149 nt) were obtained; however, genome coverage remained fragmented. In contrast, the limited number of YFV-specific reads in sample AR888788 hindered contig assembly. The partial YFV sequences generated in this study are available as Supplementary Materials S2 and S3.
The assembled contigs showed significant similarity to YFV reference sequences available in GenBank, including strains UVG67813 and AWB15005, both previously reported in Brazil (Table 3). BLASTX analyses indicated partial alignments with the YFV polyprotein, covering 21% to 39% of the reference sequences, with sequence identities of 99.74% and 99.46% and highly significant e-values (0.0 and 5 × 10−105), respectively.

4. Discussion

Brazil is recognized as an endemic region for YFV, with the Amazonian area serving as a key hotspot due to its diverse natural reservoirs, such as non-human primates and various mosquito vector species [5,23]. The region’s unique ecological and climatic conditions are highly conducive to the persistence of the sylvatic transmission cycle. Its rich biodiversity and complex forest structure facilitate the maintenance and periodic reemergence of YFV in zones previously considered low-risk [19,21,44]. Here, the present study reports the molecular detection of YFV in four pools of Hg. janthinomys mosquitoes, collected during entomovirological surveys carried out in March 2024 in a rural settlement within the metropolitan region of Belém, Pará.
The faunal analysis revealed mosquito diversity and distribution, with a predominance of specimens collected at ground level (79.7%) compared to the canopy (20.3%). Hg. janthinomys was the most abundant species (26.9%), recorded in both strata but more frequently in the canopy, highlighting its affinity for sylvatic environments and its central role in arbovirus transmission, particularly in enzootic cycles involving non-human primates. Notably, this species is a well-documented vector of YFV and MAYV [6,9,11,28,45,46,47], exhibiting ecological versatility and a dispersal capacity exceeding 11 km [48,49], which supports its role as a bridge vector between forested habitats and human-modified areas, especially in regions experiencing intense land-use change.
The detection of YFV exclusively in Hg. janthinomys pools reinforces its epidemiological role in the Brazilian Amazon, corroborating previous data that confirm it as the primary vector in the region [9,50,51,52,53]. Molecular analysis by RT-qPCR revealed Ct values ranging from 22.2 to 27.9 in YFV-positive pools, confirming the presence of viral RNA. It should be noted, however, that Ct values obtained from pooled samples cannot be directly interpreted as viral loads, since they may reflect the contribution of multiple infected individuals within the same pool. Metagenomic sequencing further confirmed the presence of YFV through reads assigned to the virus and partial contigs showing high protein identity (>99%) with regions of the viral polyprotein from YFV reference sequences available in GenBank. In the BLASTX analysis, the most significant hits included strains UVG67813 and AWB15005, both previously reported in Brazil. Although the number of viral reads was limited and did not allow near-complete genome assembly, these results provide robust confirmation of YFV circulation in the sampled mosquito populations.
Although no viral detection was observed in the other species investigated in this study, it is important to highlight that many of them play relevant roles in the ecology of arboviruses. The record of Haemagogus leucocelaenus, albeit represented by a single specimen collected in the canopy, deserves attention due to its vector competence [54] and its relevance as a primary YFV vector in the South and Southeast regions of Brazil [11,16,55,56,57,58].
Although less abundant, mosquitoes of the genus Sabethes, such as Sa. (Sabethoides) chloropterus, may contribute to YFV transmission and can act as primary vectors under specific conditions, such as during periods of reduced activity of the main vectors [9,59]. Among Aedes species, Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus stands out as an exotic species with a wide distribution and proven vector competence for several arboviruses, including YFV [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. Its high ecological plasticity allows it to function as a bridge vector between rural, forested, and urban environments [68,69,70,71]. Other species of the genus, such as Aedes (Ochlerotatus) serratus and Aedes (Ochlerotatus) scapularis, are also epidemiologically relevant and associated with transition areas, having been found naturally infected with different arboviruses, including YFV [31,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) ferox, although aggressive and highly dispersive, showed no YFV infection in this study, consistent with recent findings [83] indicating a secondary or negligible role of this species in virus transmission, with infection confirmed primarily in Hg. janthinomys.
In addition to YFV, other epidemiologically relevant arboviruses were screened but not detected in the mosquito samples collected in this study. Orthoflavivirus denguei (DENV) is endemic in Pará, with recurrent outbreaks; between 2024 and 2025, over 15,000 probable cases were reported, including 53 in the municipality under study [84], although no active cases were recorded during the collection period, which coincided with the beginning of the rainy season, a period of higher vector density and transmission risk. SLEV and WNV have low regional incidence, with recent WNV circulation confirmed primarily in the states of Minas Gerais and Piauí, and human cases remaining sporadic and limited [85,86]; the first isolation of WNV in mosquitoes in Brazil occurred in southeastern Pará from a Culex (Melanoconion) sp. Pool [24]. CHIKV has caused significant outbreaks in Brazil since 2014; between 2024 and 2025, over 2500 probable cases were reported in Pará, including 23 in the study municipality [84], but no active cases occurred during sampling. Finally, MAYV and OROV have a history of local outbreaks, most recently in 2008 and 2018, respectively, with OROV outbreaks predominating in the region and additional cases of MAYV and CHIKV reported [28,29].
Although the absence of detection for these arboviruses was somewhat unexpected, this result should be interpreted in the context of ongoing local surveillance, conducted annually during the rainy season. This period, coinciding with increased vector densities, is historically associated with higher incidence of arbovirus cases. Continuous monitoring during this season is therefore essential for the early detection of viruses such as DENV, CHIKV, MAYV, and OROV.
It is worth highlighting the possibility of underestimating viral circulation in less abundant species or those with low infection rates, as well as the absence of molecular analysis in some species that were not tested by RT-qPCR. Additionally, seasonal and environmental factors may significantly influence both the composition of the fauna and the dynamics of viral transmission, since the investigation was conducted exclusively during the rainy season. Thus, the implementation of longitudinal studies with broader temporal and spatial coverage, including the expansion of sampling sites and the inclusion of a more representative number of species in molecular analyses, should be considered in future investigations.
In summary, the results of this study expand our understanding of vector entomofauna and arbovirus circulation in forested areas of the metropolitan region of Belém. The detection of YFV in arthropods, even in the absence of human cases or non-human primate deaths, enabled the prompt activation of surveillance efforts, including the vaccination of the local population. The confirmation of Hg. janthinomys as an active vector of YFV, combined with the area’s outbreak history, indicates that the region is a potential hotspot for the emergence and re-emergence of arboviruses. These findings emphasize the importance of integrated monitoring strategies that consider local ecological, historical, and entomological contexts. Maintaining systematic entomovirological surveillance actions, alongside expanding yellow fever vaccination coverage, is essential for preventing and mitigating future viral emergencies in the Amazon region, reinforcing its role as a predictive tool for early detection of both human and animal cases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v17091258/s1, Supplementary Material S1, RT-qPCR amplification plots illustrating viral detection; Supplementary Material S2, partial contig recovered from sample AR888776; and Supplementary Material S3, partial contig of Yellow Fever Virus (YFV) recovered from sample AR888787.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.N.N., L.M.N.C. and A.C.R.C.; methodology, D.D.D., S.P.d.S., S.L.S.d.S., L.A.M.R., H.C.F.R., D.B.R.V., R.C.F.B., W.O.R., F.A.d.S.P. and J.W.R.J.; software, D.D.D.; validation, J.P.N.N., D.D.D. and B.L.S.d.N.; formal analysis, D.D.D., J.P.N.N. and B.L.S.d.N.; investigation, B.L.S.d.N., F.S.d.S., L.H.d.S.e.S., D.B.R.V., R.C.F.B., S.L.S.d.S. and J.W.R.J.; resources, J.P.N.N., L.M.N.C., B.T.D.N., L.C.M. and A.C.R.C.; data curation, J.P.N.N., D.D.D. and B.L.S.d.N.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.N.N., D.D.D. and B.L.S.d.N.; writing—review and editing, J.P.N.N., D.D.D. and B.L.S.d.N.; visualization, J.P.N.N., D.D.D. and B.L.S.d.N.; supervision, J.P.N.N., L.M.N.C. and A.C.R.C.; project administration, J.P.N.N., L.M.N.C. and A.C.R.C.; funding acquisition, J.P.N.N., B.T.D.N., L.C.M., L.M.N.C. and A.C.R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Evandro Chagas Institute, Secretariat of Health and Environmental Surveillance, Brazilian Ministry of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the “Expedito Ribeiro” Agroecological Settlement of Rural Workers, especially the Miranda family, represented by Edinael Miranda Barradas and Joelma Miranda, for their invaluable support and longstanding collaboration. We also extend our gratitude to the transportation department of the Instituto Evandro Chagas for their logistical assistance during field expeditions. Finally, we are grateful to the reviewers for their constructive comments, which greatly contributed to improving the quality of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RT-qPCRReal-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
YFYellow Fever
YFVYellow Fever virus
DENVOrthoflavivirus denguei
WNVOrthoflavivirus nilense
SLEVOrthoflavivirus louisense
CHIKVAlphavirus chikungunya
MAYVAlphavirus mayaro
OROVOropouche orthobunyavirus
ILHVOrthoflavivirus ilheusense

References

  1. Monath, T.P.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C. Yellow Fever. J. Clin. Virol. 2015, 64, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barrett, A.D.T. The Reemergence of Yellow Fever. Science 2018, 361, 847–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Monath, T.P. Yellow Fever Remains a Potential Threat to Public Health. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016, 16, 566–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Yellow Book 2026: Health Information for International Travel; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/yellow-book/hcp/contents/index.html (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  5. da Costa Vasconcelos, P.F. Yellow Fever in Brazil: Thoughts and Hypotheses on the Emergence in Previously Free Areas. Rev. Saude Publica 2010, 44, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância das Doenças Transmissíveis. Guia de Vigilância de Epizootias em Primatas não Humanos e Entomologia Aplicada à Vigilância da Febre Amarela/Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância das Doenças Transmissíveis.—2. ed.—Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2014. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_vigilancia_epizootias_primatas_entomologia.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  7. Cavalcante, K.R.L.J.; Tauil, P.L. Características Epidemiológicas Da Febre Amarela No Brasil, 2000–2012. Epidemiol. Serv. Saude 2016, 25, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silva, N.I.O.; Sacchetto, L.; de Rezende, I.M.; de Souza Trindade, G.; LaBeaud, A.D.; de Thoisy, B.; Drumond, B.P. Recent Sylvatic Yellow Fever Virus Transmission in Brazil: The News from an Old Disease. Virol. J. 2020, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. da Costa Vasconcelos, P.F. Yellow fever. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2003, 36, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guia de Vigilância de Epizootias em Primatas não Humanos e Entomologia Aplicada à Vigilância da Febre Amarela, 2nd ed.; Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância das Doenças Transmissíveis: Brasília, Brazil, 2014; 100 p. il; ISBN 978-85-334-2102-8.
  11. de Abreu, F.V.S.; Ferreira-de-Brito, A.; dos Santos, A.A.C.; de Miranda, R.M.; de Souza Bonelly, I.; Falqueto, A.; Paupy, C.; Carvalho, G.; Moutailler, S.; Lourenço-Oliveira, R.; et al. Haemagogus leucocelaenus and Haemagogus janthinomys are the primary vectors in the major yellow fever outbreak in Brazil, 2016–2018. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. WHO. Prevention and Control of Yellow Fever in Africa; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1986; p. 96.
  13. Costa, Z.G.A.; Romano, A.P.M.; Elkhoury, A.N.S.M.; Flannery, B. Evolução histórica da vigilância epidemiológica e do controle da febre amarela no Brasil. Rev. Pan-Amaz Saúde 2011, 2, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Costa, Z.C.; Travassos Da Rosa, E.S.; Luna, E.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Barros, V.L.; Dias, J.P.; Monteiro, H.A.; Oliva, O.F.; Vasconcelos, H.B.; et al. Epidemia de febre amarela na selva no Brasil, 2000: Implicações das alterações climáticas na disseminação da doença. J. Med. Virol. 2001, 65, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Carmo, E.H.; Martins, E.; Pelucci, H.H.; Maia, M.L.; Duzzi, R.T.S.; Costa, Z.G. Brote de fiebre amarilla selvática en Minas Gerais, Brasil. Organización Pan-Americana de la Salud, Washington. Boletin Inf. 2002, 24, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cardoso, J.C.; Almeida, M.A.B.; dos Santos, E.; da Fonseca, D.F.; Sallum, M.A.M.; Noll, C.; Monteiro, A.O.; Cruz, A.C.R.; Carvalho, V.L.; Pinto, E.V.; et al. Yellow fever virus in Haemagogus leucocelaenus and Aedes serratus mosquitoes, Southern Brazil, 2008. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1918–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romano, A.P.; Costa, Z.G.; Ramos, D.G.; Andrade, M.A.; Jayme Vde, S.; Almeida, M.A.; Vettorello, K.C.; Mascheretti, M.; Flannery, B. Yellow fever outbreaks in unvaccinated populations, Brazil, 2008–2009. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vasconcelos, P.F.D.C. Febre amarela: Reflexões sobre a doença, as perspectivas para o século XXI e o risco da reurbanização. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2002, 5, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cavalcante, K.R.L.J.; Tauil, P.L. Risk of re-emergence of urban yellow fever in Brazil. Epidemiol. Serv. Saude Brasília 2017, 26, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Possas, C.; Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R.; Tauil, P.L.; de Pinheiro, F.P.; Pissinatti, A.; da Cunha, R.V.; Freire, M.; Martins, R.M.; Homma, A. Yellow fever outbreak in Brazil: The puzzle of rapid viral spread and challenges for immunisation. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2018, 113, e180278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Guia de Vigilancia em Saúde, 3rd ed.; Ministério da Saúde: Brasília, DF, Brasill, 2019. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_vigilancia_saude_3ed.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  22. Soper, F.L. Ventures in World Health: The Memoirs of Fred Lowe Soper; Pan American Health Organization: Washington, DC, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vasconcelos, P.F.; Bryant, J.E.; da Rosa, T.P.; Tesh, R.B.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Barrett, A.D. Genetic divergence and dispersal of yellow fever virus, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 1578–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Neto, J.P.N.; Reis, L.A.M.; Freitas, M.N.O.; do Nascimento, B.L.S.; das Chagas, L.L.; da Costa, H.H.M.; Rodrigues, J.C.P.; Braga, C.M.; da Silva, E.V.P.; Silva, S.P. First Isolation and Genome Sequence Analysis of West Nile Virus in Mosquitoes in Brazil. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cruz, A.C.R.; Hernández, L.H.A.; Aragão, C.F.; Da Paz, T.Y.B.; Da Silva, S.P.; Da Silva, F.S.; De Aquino, A.A.; Cereja, G.J.G.P.; Nascimento, B.L.S.D.; Rosa Junior, J.W.; et al. The Importance of Entomo-Virological Investigation of Yellow Fever Virus to Strengthen Surveillance in Brazil. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lemos, P.d.S.; Pacheco, M.M.M.; do Nascimento, B.L.S.; Coelho, M.S.; Franco Filho, L.C.; Dias, D.D.; Sena, L.; da Silva, S.P.; Sallum, M.A.M. The Frontier of Entomo-Virology: Applications and Tools for Virus and Vector Surveillance. Pathogens 2025, 14, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Medeiros, D.B.A.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C. Is the Brazilian Diverse Environment Is a Crib for the Emergence and Maintenance of Exotic Arboviruses? An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2019, 91, e20190407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Azevedo, R.S.S.; Silva, E.V.P.; Carvalho, V.L.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Neto, J.P.N.; Monteiro, H.A.O.; Peixoto, V.S.; Chiang, J.O.; Nunes, M.R.T.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C. Mayaro Fever Virus, Brazilian Amazon. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1830–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Carvalho, V.L.; Azevedo, R.S.S.; Carvalho, V.L.; Azevedo, R.S.; Henriques, D.F.; Cruz, A.C.R.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Martins, L.C. Arbovirus Outbreak in a Rural Region of the Brazilian Amazon. J. Clin. Virol. 2022, 150–151, 105155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brasil. Guia Para o Planejamento das Ações de Captura de Anofelinos Pela Técnica de Atração Por Humano Protegido (TAHP) e Acompanhamento dos Riscos à Saúde do Profissional Capturador; Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Imunização e Doenças Transmissíveis, Ministério da Saúde: Brasilia, Brazil, 2019. Available online: http://Bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_planejamento_acoes_captura_anofelinos_tecnica_atracao_humano_protegido.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  31. Forattini, O.P. Culicidologia Médica: Identificação, Biologia, Epidemiologia; Edusp: São Paulo, Brazil, 2002; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  32. Reinert, J.F. List of abbreviations for currently valid generic-level taxa in family Culicidae (Diptera). Eur. Mosq. Bull. 2009, 27, 68–76. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20103074044 (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  33. Fischer, C.; Torres, M.C.; Patel, P.; Moreira-Soto, A.; Gould, E.A.; Charrel, R.N.; de Lamballerie, X.; Nogueira, R.M.R.; Sequeira, P.C.; Rodrigues, C.D.S.; et al. Lineage-specific real-time reverse transcription PCR for yellow fever virus outbreak surveillance, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1867–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Santiago, G.A.; Vergne, E.; Quiles, Y.; Cosme, J.; Vazquez, J.; Medina, J.F.; Medina, F.; Colón, C.; Margolis, H.; Muñoz-Jordán, J.L. Analytical and clinical performance of the CDC real time RT-PCR assay for detection and typing of dengue virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lanciotti, R.S.; Kerst, A.J. Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification Assays for Rapid Detection of West Nile and St. Louis Encephalitis Viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 4506–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lanciotti, R.S.; Kerst, A.J.; Nasci, R.S.; Godsey, M.S.; Mitchell, C.J.; Savage, H.M.; Komar, N.; Panella, N.A.; Allen, B.C.; Volpe, K.E.; et al. Rapid detection of west nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 4066–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lanciotti, R.S.; Kosoy, O.L.; Laven, J.J.; Panella, A.J.; Velez, J.O.; Lambert, A.J.; Campbell, G.L. Chikungunya virus in US travelers returning from India, 2006. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Naveca, F.G.; Nascimento, V.A.D.; Souza, V.C.; Nunes, B.T.D.; Rodrigues, D.S.G.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C. Multiplexed reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous detection of Mayaro, Oropouche, and Oropouche-like viruses. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2017, 112, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. Fastp: An Ultra-Fast All-in-One FASTQ Preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, D.; Liu, C.-M.; Luo, R.; Sadakane, K.; Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1674–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wood, D.E.; Lu, J.; Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vasconcelos, P.F.; Rosa, A.P.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Rosa, E.S.; Monteiro, H.A.; Cruz, A.C.; Barros, V.L.; Souza, M.R.; Rosa, J.F. Yellow fever in Pará State, Amazon region of Brazil, 1998–1999: Entomologic and epidemiologic findings. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hoch, A.L.; Peterson, N.E.; LeDuc, J.W.; Pinheiro, F.P. An Outbreak of Mayaro Virus Disease in Belterra, Brazil III. Entomological and Ecological Studies. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1981, 30, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. LeDuc, J.W.; Pinheiro, F.P.; da Rosa, A.P.A.T. An Outbreak of Mayaro Virus Disease in Belterra, Brazil II. Epidemiology. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1981, 30, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pinheiro, F.P.; LeDuc, J.W. Mayaro virus disease. Arboviruses Epidemiol. Ecol. 1998, 3, 137–150. [Google Scholar]
  48. Causey, O.R.; Kumm, H.W.; Laemmert, H.W. Dispersion of forest mosquitoes in Brazil: Further studies. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1950, 30, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alencar, J.; Silva, J.S.; Serra-Freire, N.M.; Guimarães, A.É. Dispersion and Ecological Plasticity Patterns of Haemagogus capricornii and H. janthinomys (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations in Different Regions of Brazil. Ent. News 2009, 120, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dégallier, N.; Travassos da Rosa, A.P.; Vasconcelos, P.F.; Guerreiro, S.C.; Travassos da Rosa, J.F.; Hervé, J.P. Estimation of the survival rate, the relative density and the infection rate of a population of Haemagogus janthinomys Dyar (Diptera, Culicidae) from which strains of yellow fever were isolated in Brazilian Amazon. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1991, 84, 386–397. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vasconcelos, P.F.; Travassos da Rosa, A.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Travassos da Rosa, E.S.; Dégallier, N.; Travassos da Rosa, J.F. Inadequate management of natural ecosystem in the Brazilian Amazon region results in the emergence and reemergence of arboviruses. Cad. Saúde Pública 2001, 17, S155–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mondet, B.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Travassos da Rosa, A.P.A.; Travassos da Rosa, E.S.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Travassos da Rosa, J.F.S.; Bicout, D.J. Isolation of Yellow Fever Virus from Nulliparous Haemagogus (Haemagogus) janthinomys in Eastern Amazonia. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002, 2, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bernardi, V.; Lívia Sacchetto; Hendy, A.; Fé, N.F.; Teixeira, I.; Beatriz; Hanley, K.A.; Mourão, M.P.G.; Lacerda, M.V.G.; Vasilakis, N.; et al. Yellow Fever Virus in Mosquitoes from Rainforest Bordering Manaus, Brazil, 2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2025, 31, 851–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Waddell, M.B. Comparative efficacy of certain South American Aëdes and Haemagogus mosquitoes as laboratory vectors of yellow fever. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1949, 29, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Vasconcelos, P.F.; Sperb, A.F.; Monteiro, H.A.; Torres, M.A.; Sousa, M.R.; Vasconcelos, H.B.; Mardini, L.B.; Rodrigues, S.G. Isolations of yellow fever virus from Haemagogus leucocelaenus in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2003, 97, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. de Souza, R.P.; Petrella, S.; Coimbra, T.L.M.; Maeda, A.Y.; Rocco, I.M.; Bisordi, I.; Silveira, V.R.; Pereira, L.E.; Suzuki, A.; Silva, S.J.S.; et al. Isolation of Yellow Fever virus (YFV) from naturally infected Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus (Diptera, Culicidae) in São Paulo State, Brazil, 2009. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. S Paulo 2011, 53, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mascheretti, M.; Tengan, C.H.; Sato, H.K.; Suzuki, A.; de Souza, R.P.; Maeda, M.; Brasil, R.; Pereira, M.; Tubaki, R.M.; Wanderley, D.M.; et al. Yellow fever: Reemerging in the state of sao paulo, brazil, 2009. Rev. Saude Publica 2013, 47, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stanzani, L.M.A.; Motta, M.A.; Erbisti, R.S.; Abreu, F.V.S.; Nascimento-Pereira, A.C.; Ferreira-de-Brito, A.; Neves, M.; Pereira, G.R.; Pereira, G.R.; Santos, C.B.D.; et al. Back to Where It Was First Described: Vectors of Sylvatic Yellow Fever Transmission in the 2017 Outbreak in Espirito Santo, Brazil. Viruses 2022, 14, 2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. de Oliveira, C.H.; Andrade, M.S.; Campos, F.S.; da, C.; Cardoso, J.; Goncalves-dos-Santos, M.E.; Oliveira, R.S.; Aguino-Teixeira, S.M.; Campos, A.A.S.; Almeida, M.A.B.; et al. Yellow fever virus maintained by Sabethes mosquitoes during dry season in Cerrado, a semiarid region of Brazil, in 2021. Viruses 2023, 15, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Harbach, R.E. Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory. Available online: https://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.myspecies.info/ (accessed on 23 June 2025).
  61. Forattini, O.P. Identificação de Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) no Brasil. Rev. Saúde Pública 1986, 20, 244–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moore, C.G.; Mitchell, C.J. Aedes albopictus in the United States: Ten-year presence and public health implications. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1997, 3, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Castro, M.G.D.; Nogueira, R.M.R.; Schatzmayr, H.G.; Miagostovich, M.P.; Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. Dengue virus detection by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in saliva and progeny of experimentally infected Aedes albopictus from Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2004, 99, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Paupy, C.; Delatte, H.; Bagny, L.; Corbel, V.; Fontenille, D. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: From the darkness to the light. Microbes Infect. 2009, 11, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Little, E.A.H.; Hutchinson, M.L.; Price, K.J.; Marini, A.; Shepard, J.J.; Molaei, G. Spatiotemporal distribution, abundance, and host interactions of two invasive vectors of arboviruses, Aedes albopictus and Aedes japonicus, in Pennsylvania, USA. Parasit. Vectors 2022, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. FAPESP. Três Notícias Sobre a Febre Amarela. Revista Pesquisa FAPESP. March 2018. Available online: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/tres-noticias-sobre-a-febre-amarela/ (accessed on 23 June 2025).
  67. Damasceno-Caldeira, R.; Nunes-Neto, J.P.; Aragão, C.F.; Freitas, M.N.O.; Ferreira, M.S.; de Castro, P.H.G.; Dias, D.D.; Araújo, P.A.d.S.; Brandão, R.C.F.; Nunes, B.T.D.; et al. Vector Competence of Aedes albopictus for Yellow Fever Virus: Risk of Reemergence of Urban Yellow Fever in Brazil. Viruses 2023, 15, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Miller, B.R.; Mitchell, C.J.; Ballinger, M.E. Replication, tissue tropisms and transmission of yellow fever virus in Aedes albopictus. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1989, 83, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Azevedo, R.S.S.; Rodrigues, S.G.; Martins, L.C.; Jannifer, O.C.; Travassos-da-Rosa, A.P.A. Arboviroses. In Medicina Tropical e Infectologia na Amazônia; Leão, R.N.Q., Ed.; Editora Samaúma: Belém, Brazil, 2013; pp. 481–503. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pereira dos Santos, T.; Roiz, D.; de Abreu, F.; Luz Bessa, S.; Santa Lucia, M.; Jiolle, D.; Neves, N.; Simard, F.; Lourenço De Oliveira, R.; Paupy, C. Potential of Aedes albopictus as a bridge vector for zoonotic pathogens at the urban-forest interface of Brazil. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lwande, O.W.; Obanda, V.; Lindström, A.; Ahlm, C.; Evander, M.; Näslund, J.; Bucht, G. Globe-Trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: Risk Factors for Arbovirus Pandemics. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Forattini, O.P.; Kakitani, I.; Massad, E.; Marucci, D. Studies on mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and anthropic environment. 9-Synanthropy and epidemiological vector role of Aedes scapularis in south-eastern Brazil. Rev. Saude Publica 1995, 29, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dorvillé, L.F.M. Mosquitoes as bioindicators of forest degradation in southern Brazil, a statistical evaluation of published data in the literature. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 1996, 31, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sabattini, M.S.; Avilés, G.; Monath, T.P. Historical, epidemiological and ecological aspects of arboviruses in Argentina: Togaviridae, Alphavirus. In An Overview of Arbovirology in Brazil and Neighbouring Countries; Instituto Evandro Chagas: Belem, Brazil, 1998; pp. 135–153. [Google Scholar]
  75. Travassos da Rosa, J.; Travassos da Rosa, A.; Vasconcelos, P.; Pinheiro, F.; Rodrigues, S.; Rosa, E.; Dias, L.; Cruz, A. Arboviruses Isolated in the Evandro Chagas Institute, Including Some Described for the First Time in the Brazilian Amazon Region, Their Know Hosts, and Their Pathology for Man. In An Overview of Arbovirology in Brazil and Neighbouring Countries; Insitituto Evandro Chagas: Belém, Brazil, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  76. Pinheiro, F.; Travassos da Rosa, A.; Travassos da Rosa, J.; Ishak, R.; Freitas, R.B.; Gomes, L.M.C.; LeDuc, J.W.; Oliva, O.F.P. Oropouche Virus I. A Review of Clinical, Epidemiological, and Ecological Findings. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1981, 30, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vasconcelos, P.; Travassos da Rosa, A.; Pinheiro, F.; Shope, R.; Travassos da Rosa, J.; Rodrigues, S. Arboviruses Pathogenic for Man in Brasil. In An Overview of Arbovirology in Brazil and Neighbouring Countries; Instituto Evandro Chagas: Belém, Brazil, 1998; pp. 72–99. [Google Scholar]
  78. Caleiro, G.S.; Vilela, L.O.; Nuevo, K.M.B.; Tubaki, R.M.; de Menezes, R.M.T.; Mucci, L.F.; Telles-de-Deus, J.; Bergo, E.S.; Araújo, E.L.L.; Cunha, M.S. Yellow Fever Virus (YFV) Detection in Different Species of Culicids Collected During an Outbreak in Southeastern Brazil, 2016–2019. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2025, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sellers, R.F.; Bergold, G.H.; Suarez, O.M.; Morales, A. Investigations during Venezuelan equine encephalitis outbreaks in Venezuela-1962–1964. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1965, 13, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Forattini, O.P.; Gomes, A.D.C. Biting activity of Aedes scapularis (Rondani) and Haemagogus mosquitoes in southern Brazil (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev. Saúde. Pública 1988, 22, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pauvolid-Corrêa, A.; Kenney, J.L.; Couto-Lima, D.; Campos, Z.M.; Schatzmayr, H.G.; Nogueira, R.M.; Brault, A.C.; Komar, N. Ilheus virus isolation in the Pantanal, west-central Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cunha, M.S.; Faria, N.R.; Caleiro, G.S.; Candido, D.S.; Hill, S.C.; Claro, I.M.; da Costa, A.C.; Nogueira, J.S.; Maeda, A.Y.; da Silva, F.G.; et al. Genomic evidence of yellow fever virus in Aedes scapularis, southeastern Brazil, 2016. Acta Trop. 2020, 205, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Moreno, E.S.; Rocco, I.M.; Bergo, E.S.; Brasil, R.A.; Siciliano, M.M.; Suzuki, A.; Silveira, V.R.; Bisordi, I.; Souza, R.P. Reemergence of yellow fever: Detection of transmission in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, 2008. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2011, 44, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Tabnet. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde. September 2025. Available online: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinannet/cnv/denguebpa.def (accessed on 5 September 2025).
  85. Rosa, R.; Costa, E.A.; Marques, R.E.; Oliveira, T.S.; Furtini, R.; Bomfim, M.R.; Teixeira, M.M.; Paixão, T.A.; Santos, R.L. Isolation of saint louis encephalitis virus from a horse with neurological disease in Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Martins, L.C.; Da Silva, E.V.P.; Casseb, L.M.N.; Da Silva, S.P.; Cruz, A.C.R.; De Sousa Pantoja, J.A.; De Almeida Medeiros, D.B.; Filho, A.J.M.; Da Cruz, E.D.R.M.; De Araújo, M.T.F.; et al. First Isolation of West Nile Virus in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2019, 114, 180332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location map of the municipality of Santa Bárbara do Pará, highlighting the collection site of the investigated mosquito species. The figure was created using QGIS v.3.22 (https://qgis.org/en/site/, accessed on 6 July 2025) with cartographic data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE, 2022) (https://www.ibge.gov.br/, accessed on 6 July 2025) and raster layers from the OpenStreetMap project (https://www.openstreetmap.org/, accessed on 6 July 2025) Panel (A) shows the state of Pará; panel (B) shows South America, with Brazil outlined in red and Pará outlined in orange; and panel (C) shows the boundaries of the municipality of Santa Bárbara do Pará, indicating the collection site with a red marker.
Figure 1. Location map of the municipality of Santa Bárbara do Pará, highlighting the collection site of the investigated mosquito species. The figure was created using QGIS v.3.22 (https://qgis.org/en/site/, accessed on 6 July 2025) with cartographic data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE, 2022) (https://www.ibge.gov.br/, accessed on 6 July 2025) and raster layers from the OpenStreetMap project (https://www.openstreetmap.org/, accessed on 6 July 2025) Panel (A) shows the state of Pará; panel (B) shows South America, with Brazil outlined in red and Pará outlined in orange; and panel (C) shows the boundaries of the municipality of Santa Bárbara do Pará, indicating the collection site with a red marker.
Viruses 17 01258 g001
Table 1. Culicidae species collected using the human-attraction method in forest strata at ground level and in the canopy.
Table 1. Culicidae species collected using the human-attraction method in forest strata at ground level and in the canopy.
TaxaGroundCanopyTotalFrequency (%)
Ae. (How.) fulvithorax130134.5
Ae. (Och.) scapularis3031.0
Ae. (Och.) serratus260269.1
Ae. (Pro.) argyrothorax6062.1
Ae. (Sal.) hortator1010.3
Ae. (Stg.) albopictus1010.3
Ae. (Stg.) albopictus3031.0
Cx. (Car.) sp. ♀1010.3
Hg. (Hag.) janthinomys30477726.9
Li. durhamii5051.7
Li. flavisetosus6706723.4
Ps. (Jan.) ferox171186.3
Trichoprosopon sp. ♀1010.3
Wyeomyia sp. ♀5405418.9
Hg. (Con.) leucocelaenus0110.3
Sa. (Sbo.) chloropterus0772.4
Sa. (Sbo.) glaucodaemon0220.7
Total22858286100
Legend: ♂—Male; ♀—Female.
Table 2. Mosquito species and number of specimens per pool, viral panel used for RT-qPCR screening, and Ct values.
Table 2. Mosquito species and number of specimens per pool, viral panel used for RT-qPCR screening, and Ct values.
Sample IDSpecies (Number Per Pool)RT-qPCR Viral ScreenCt Value
AR888768Ae. (How.) fulvithorax ♀ (13)YFV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888769Ae. (Och.) scapularis ♀ (3)YFV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888770Ae. (Och.) serratus ♀ (26)YFV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888771Ae. (Pro.) argyrothorax ♀ (6)YFV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888772Ae. (Sal.) hortator ♀ (1)YFV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888773Ae. (Stg.) albopictus ♀ (1)YFV, DENV, CHIKV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888774Ae. (Stg.) albopictus ♂ (3)YFV, DENV, CHIKV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888775Cx. (Car.) sp. ♀ (1)WNV, SLEV-
AR888776 Hg. (Hag.) janthinomys (30) ♀ (Ground)YFV, MAYV, OROVYFV = 23.7
AR888777Li. durhamii ♀ (5)NA-
AR888778Li. flavisetosus ♀ (25)NA-
AR888779Li. flavisetosus ♀ (32)NA-
AR888780Li. flavisetosus ♀ (10)NA-
AR888781Ps. (Jan.) ferox ♀ (17)YFV, MAYV-
AR888782Trichoprosopon sp. ♀ (1)NA-
AR888783Wyeomyia sp. ♀ (21)NA-
AR888784Wyeomyia sp. ♀ (33)NA-
AR888785Hg. (Con.) leucocelaenus ♀ (1)YFV, MAYV, OROV-
AR888786Hg. (Hag.) janthinomys (10) ♀ (Canopy)YFV, MAYV, OROVYFV = 26.1
AR888787Hg. (Hag.) janthinomys (27) ♀ (Canopy)YFV, MAYV, OROVYFV = 22.2
AR888788Hg. (Hag.) janthinomys (10) ♀ (Canopy)YFV, MAYV, OROVYFV = 27.9
AR888789Ps. (Jan.) ferox ♀ (1)YFV, MAYV-
AR888790Sa. (Sbo.) chloropterus ♀ (7)YFV-
AR888791Sa. (Sbo.) glaucodaemon ♀ (2)YFV-
Legend: ID—Sample identification; ♂—Male ♀—Female; YFV: Orthoflavivirus flavi; DENV: Orthoflavivirus denguei; WNV: Orthoflavivirus nilense; SLEV: Orthoflavivirus louisense; CHIKV: Alphavirus chikungunya; MAYV: Alphavirus mayaro; OROV: Oropouche orthobunyavirus; RT-qPCR: Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; Ct: Cycle threshold; NA: Not analyzed.
Table 3. Results of metagenomic sequencing, taxonomic classification, and BLASTX analysis of pools positive for YFV.
Table 3. Results of metagenomic sequencing, taxonomic classification, and BLASTX analysis of pools positive for YFV.
BLASTX
Sample IDRaw DataFastpViral
Reads
YFV ReadsN° of
Contigs
RegionPer.
Identity
(%)
QC
(%)
e-ValueGenbank
Accession
AR88877637,830,53036,550,11250,390 545pol99.74390.0UVG67813
AR88878740,537,09439,359,82237,007127pol99.46215 × 10−105AWB15005
AR88878832,571,89631,670,07238,1783NANANANANANA
Legend: Raw data: total number of paired raw reads generated; Fastp: number of reads retained after quality control; Viral Reads: total number of viral reads identified; YFV Reads: number of reads assigned to yellow fever virus (YFV); N°. of contigs: number of assembled contigs; Region: identified genomic region; pol: viral polyprotein; Per. identity (%): percentage identity of the protein compared to the reference sequence; QC: query coverage; e-value: statistical value of the alignment; GenBank accession: reference sequence identifier in the GenBank database; NA: not applicable, indicates absence of data.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nunes Neto, J.P.; Dias, D.D.; Nascimento, B.L.S.d.; da Silva, S.P.; da Silva, S.L.S.; Reis, L.A.M.; Reis, H.C.F.; da Silva, F.S.; da Silva e Silva, L.H.; Vieira, D.B.R.; et al. Molecular Detection of Yellow Fever Virus in Haemagogus janthinomys Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Rural Settlement in the State of Pará, Brazilian Amazon, 2024. Viruses 2025, 17, 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091258

AMA Style

Nunes Neto JP, Dias DD, Nascimento BLSd, da Silva SP, da Silva SLS, Reis LAM, Reis HCF, da Silva FS, da Silva e Silva LH, Vieira DBR, et al. Molecular Detection of Yellow Fever Virus in Haemagogus janthinomys Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Rural Settlement in the State of Pará, Brazilian Amazon, 2024. Viruses. 2025; 17(9):1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nunes Neto, Joaquim Pinto, Daniel Damous Dias, Bruna Laís Sena do Nascimento, Sandro Patroca da Silva, Sâmia Luzia Sena da Silva, Lúcia Aline Moura Reis, Hanna Carolina Farias Reis, Fábio Silva da Silva, Lucas Henrique da Silva e Silva, Durval Bertram Rodrigues Vieira, and et al. 2025. "Molecular Detection of Yellow Fever Virus in Haemagogus janthinomys Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Rural Settlement in the State of Pará, Brazilian Amazon, 2024" Viruses 17, no. 9: 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091258

APA Style

Nunes Neto, J. P., Dias, D. D., Nascimento, B. L. S. d., da Silva, S. P., da Silva, S. L. S., Reis, L. A. M., Reis, H. C. F., da Silva, F. S., da Silva e Silva, L. H., Vieira, D. B. R., Brandão, R. C. F., Rosário, W. O., Paiva, F. A. d. S., Júnior, J. W. R., Nunes, B. T. D., Martins, L. C., Casseb, L. M. N., & Cruz, A. C. R. (2025). Molecular Detection of Yellow Fever Virus in Haemagogus janthinomys Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Rural Settlement in the State of Pará, Brazilian Amazon, 2024. Viruses, 17(9), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17091258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop