Next Article in Journal
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Elicits Glycolytic Metabolism in Pediatric Upper and Lower Airways
Previous Article in Journal
Treatment of E. coli Infections with T4-Related Bacteriophages Belonging to Class Caudoviricetes: Selecting Phage on the Basis of Their Generalized Transduction Capability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus: A Narrative Review

1
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Uonuma Kikan Hospital, Minami-Uonuma 949-7302, Japan
2
Division of Virology, Department of Infection and Immunity, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi 329-0498, Tochigi, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2025, 17(5), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050702
Submission received: 14 April 2025 / Revised: 12 May 2025 / Accepted: 12 May 2025 / Published: 14 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)

Abstract

:
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is an emerging infectious disease. HEV-1 and HEV-2 infect humans through contaminated water and foods, mainly in developing countries. HEV-3 and HEV-4 also infect humans through contaminated food and are thought to be zoonotic infections occurring in both developing and developed countries. A vaccine for hepatitis E is licensed in only limited countries. The inactivation of infectious HEV is very important to ensure the safety of drinking water and foods. HEV-3 and HEV-4 RNA have been detected in some pig liver products, and it is possible that these foods may represent an infectious source of HEV. In this article, previous publications on the heat inactivation and heat stability of HEV are collected, and we discuss the present assessment of the heat inactivation of HEV. The thermal stability of HEV infection in cell culture systems and pig bioassays has been demonstrated, while the efficacy of the method of thermal inactivation using plasma products has not yet been established. Here, we propose that the treatment of HEV-contaminated foods at 95 °C for 10 min is one of the safest options for the inactivation of HEV.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection causes acute hepatitis, including fulminant hepatitis, and chronically infects immunocompromised humans [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. HEV infection also carries extrahepatic manifestations, such as Guillain–Barré and Miller Fisher syndromes [8]. The broad-spectrum antiviral ribavirin, available with or without interferon, is effective in eradicating HEV in chronic hepatitis E. However, it cannot be used to treat some populations due to its adverse events; for example, pregnant women and patients with anemia [9,10,11]. Other antivirals against HEV are in development. It is important to prevent HEV infection [11].
HEV is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus with an approximate genome length of 7.2 kb [11]. The HEV particle consists of two forms: the quasi-enveloped form (eHEV: the membrane-associated form) and the nonenveloped form (neHEV: the non-membrane-associated form). eHEV is coated within the lipid membrane, and, like the exosome, it is released from hepatocytes into the blood stream and the cell-culture-conditioned medium. neHEV is formed from eHEV by the detergents of bile acids and is present in the bile and feces. In general, HEV replicates in hepatocytes. Human HEV has four major genotypes, as follows: HEV-1 and HEV-2 infect humans through contaminated water and foods, mainly in developing countries; HEV-3 and HEV-4 also infect humans through contaminated foods, are thought to be zoonotic infections, and are found in both developing and developed countries [11,12,13].
At present, HEV’s transmission routes, environmental stability, heterogeneity, and treatment are still not fully understood [14]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately 20 million HEV infections occur every year, resulting in about 3.3 million symptomatic cases worldwide [15]. The WHO reported that hepatitis E caused approximately 44,000 deaths in 2015 [15]. Thus, HEV infection is one of the most significant emerging infectious diseases in the developing and developed worlds.
The inactivation of infectious HEV is very important to ensure the safety of drinking water and foods. It has been reported that several methods, such as dry heating, liquid heating, high-pressure processing, solvent treatment, detergent treatment, chlorine and ultraviolet treatment, and virus-removal filtering (nanofilters) have been developed for the inactivation and/or removal of HEV from different sources, such as clotting factor concentrates [16,17], plasma products [18], blood products [19,20,21], pig livers [22,23,24], drinking water [25,26], and cell cultures [27,28,29]. However, the results of these studies are varied. Further investigations into HEV inactivation and removal are urgently needed in the near future.
A vaccine for hepatitis E is not yet available in any country other than China and Pakistan [30]. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is useful for the prevention of the transfusion transmission of HEV infection [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. In Japan, universal individual donation NAT screening, with its urgent requirement for blood donations, was commenced in 2020 [36,37]. HEV infects humans through contaminated water and foods. The consumption of uncooked or undercooked pig liver or intestines seems to be a major source of HEV-3/HEV-4 infection in Japan [38,39,40], Germany [41,42], Italy [43], Colombia [44], the United States [22,45,46], the Netherlands [47], India [48], France [49], and Ireland [50] (Table 1). To prevent HEV infection, water and food should be provided after the inactivation of HEV. In this review, previous publications on the heat inactivation and heat stability of HEV have been collected, and we discuss the present assessment of the heat inactivation of HEV.

2. Thermal Stability of Hepatitis E Virus in Cell Culture Systems

Huang et al. [51] reported that four HEV-1 or HEV-4 strains—G93-1, G93-3, and G93-4 or G93-2, respectively, which were originally isolated in the human lung carcinoma A549 cell line from the feces of four patients with acute hepatitis E at Guangzhou Municipal Infectious Diseases Hospital in 1993—were not resistant to heat applied at 56 °C for 30 min. Their heat stability was determined by a microculture titration method using A549 cells. The authors evaluated the cytopathic effect (CPE) via virus titration, and their titers were all <1.0 (50% tissue culture infective dose/0.025 mL) [51]. They used an L9(34)-positive-cross design, after serial 10-fold dilution was performed in a growth medium, to select the best propagation conditions [51].
Emerson et al. [52] examined the thermal stability of the HEV-1 Akluj and Sar55 strains, which were isolated from patients with hepatitis in India and Pakistan, respectively. Further, HEV-2 Mex 14 stock in HepG2/C3A cells was assessed via residual infectivity, which was determined by immunofluorescent microscopy. Almost all of the Akluj strain was inactivated after treatment at 56 °C for 1 h, and the 50% inactivation temperature was between 45 °C and 50 °C; however, approximately 1% of the Akluj strain was still infectious, even after heating at 56 °C for 1 h [52].
Almost 50% of Sar55 was inactivated by incubation at 56 °C for 1 h, and 96% of Sar55 was inactivated by incubation at 60 °C for 1 h. Mex 14 was not inactivated at 56 °C for 1 h, but about 80% of Mex 14 was inactivated at 60 °C for 1 h [52]. For reference, 60 °C is 140 °F, which is close to the internal temperature of rare steak (135 °F) [52]. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed 300–400 and 500–600 positive HepG2/C3A cells infected with the HEV-1 Akluj and Sar55 strains, respectively, after treatment at 4 °C for 1 h; ~50 and 2000–2500 positive HepG2/C3A cells infected with HEV-1 Akluj and Sar55 strains, respectively, after treatment at 50 °C for 1 h; and ~20 or ~40 positive HepG2/C3A cells infected with HEV-2 Mex 14 after treatment at 4 °C or 50 °C for 1 h, respectively [52].
Tanaka et al. [53] examined the thermal stability of the HEV-3b (JE03-1760F) strain, which was originally isolated from fecal specimens of a 67-year-old Japanese patient with acute hepatitis E and chronic renal failure, in PLC/PRF/5 cells. They measured HEV RNA levels in the culture medium. HEV RNA was measured via real-time detection RT-PCR.
They were diluted to 6.0 × 104 copies per well and inoculated on PLC/PRF/5 cells [53]. When the same amount of HEV inoculum was incubated at 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 1 min, or 70 °C for 10 min prior to inoculation on PLC/PRF/5 cells, HEV RNA was not detectable throughout the observation period of 50 days following inoculation. Following the incubations at 56 °C for 30 min and room temperature (25 °C) for 30 min, HEV RNA was first detected on day 20 and day 16, respectively [53].
Yunoki et al. [18] examined the thermal stability of pig HEV strains (HEV-3e, HEV-3a, HEV-3b, and HEV-4c) in A549 cells [18]. In their study, they used HEV-3e, HEV-3a, HEV-3b, and HEV-4c, respectively, showed 7.5 or 7.7, 7.2 or 8.4, 6.3 and 7.0, 7.0/7.4, 7.4, 6.8 or 7.2 log copies per mL of the viral titer HEV genome and 4.8 or 5.8, 4.8 or 5.3, 3.8 and not available (N/A), 4.8, 3.2, 3.8, or 3.8 log dilution non-detectable end-points per mL of HEV infectivity [18]. They reported that residual infectivity was not detected with a log reduction factor (LRF) >4.0 after treatment at 80 °C for 24 h in any of the samples. HEV infectivity was detected in all the samples that were treated at 60 °C for 72 h [18].
PCR-based methods may not be suitable for use in differentiating between infectious and non-infectious viruses [54]. Schielke et al. [54] applied an RNase A treatment followed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR in order to distinguish disassembled from intact viral particles. They examined the thermal stability of wild boar liver containing HEV-3i isolate wbGER27 in the three cell lines PLC/PRF/5, A549, and HepG2, followed by viral antigen detection by immunofluorescence. An analysis by quantitative real-time RT-PCR revealed 5 × 108 genome equivalents (GEs) per mL in the liver suspension. Treatment with RNase A prior to RNA extraction resulted in 3 × 107 GE/mL corresponding to intact viral particles in the liver suspension. They assessed HEV stability at different temperatures for 1 min and found that the incubation at 80 °C and 85 °C for 1 min resulted in 2.47-log10 and 2.58-log10 reductions, respectively, whereas the incubations at 90 °C and 95 °C for 1 min resulted in 3.58-log10 and 3.67-log10 reductions, respectively [54].
Johne et al. [28] examined the thermal stability of the HEV-3 strain 47832c in A549/D3, using the titration method and via the counting of focus-forming units (ffu) by immunofluorescence, leading to measurements of HEV infectivity. HEV infectivity lasts up to 21 days at 37 °C, up to 28 days at room temperature, and up to at least 56 days at 4 °C. After 1 min of heating at 80 °C, 85 °C, and 90 °C, no ffus were observed [28]. In their experiments, they used HEV, which had a viral infectivity of at least 3.7 log ffus in infection experiments.
Imagawa et al. [55] examined the thermal stabilities of HEV-3 strain 83-2 and HEV-4 strain 121-12, which were isolated from pig liver, in PLC/PRF/5 cells. The concentrations of virus culture supernatants used were 1.74 × 108 copies per mL for HEV-3 and 1.83 × 108 copies per mL for HEV-4. They observed the differences in the thermal stability of HEV-3 and HEV-4. Both HEV-3 and HEV-4 were inactivated in culture supernatants heated at >65 °C for 5 min and >80 °C for 1 min and in minced meat treated at 70 °C for 5 min. They also examined the internal temperature of pork during cooking. Boiling showed superior heating efficacy to roasting [55].
Stunnenberg et al. [56] examined the thermal stability of HEV-3c strain 14-16753 and HEV-3e strain 14-22707 in a PLC/PRF/5 cell culture medium and in extracts from inoculated pork products after the thermal food-processing step. Either HEV-3c or HEV-3e with an unknown titer was used, for which the number of viral particles has not yet been estimated. They performed an immunofluorescence detection assay using A549/D3 cells and a real-time RT-PCR assay. For the liver homogenate, the greatest degree of the inactivation of HEV-3c and HEV-3e was observed following treatment at 71 °C for 5 min or longer [56].
Monini et al. [57] examined the thermal stability of HEV-3c strain IT-13 and HEV-3e strain IT-12 in A549 cells via real-time RT-PCR detection focusing on HEV RNA in the cell supernatant. Five hundred μL aliquots of the viral stocks of HEV-3e or HEV-3c containing 2.54 × 105 or 1.02 × 106 genome copies/mL, respectively, were conserved in 0.5 mL tubes. HEV RNA was not reduced by treatment at −20 °C for 12 weeks. Heat treatment at 56 °C for 12 min did not influence the in vitro infectivity of HEV-3c, but heat treatment at 56 °C for 6 min or 12 min reduced HEV-3e infectivity. The heat inactivation of HEV at 93 °C for 1 min and 3 min left no residual HEV RNA [57]. A summary of the thermal stability of HEV in cell culture systems is shown in Table 2. Examinations for the thermal stability of HEV in cell culture systems are useful for the study of the thermal stability of HEV (Figure 1a).
Table 2. Representative reports of the thermal stability of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) in cell culture systems.
Table 2. Representative reports of the thermal stability of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) in cell culture systems.
HEV GenotypesCell LinesDetection MethodsTreatment Temperature and DurationCompletely InactivationRefs.
HEV-1/4A549TCID50/0.025 mL, CPE56 °C for 30 minYes[51]
HEV-1HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)4 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-1HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)50 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-1HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)56 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-1HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)60 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-2HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)4 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-2HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)50 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-2HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)56 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-2HepG2/C3AFocus-forming units (ffu)60 °C for 1 hNo[52]
HEV-3bPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM56 °C for 30 minNo[53]
HEV-3bPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM70 °C for 10 minYes[53]
HEV-3bPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM95 °C for 1 minYes[53]
HEV-3bPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM95 °C for 10 minYes[53]
HEV-3A549Real-time RT-PCR for cellular HEV RNA80 °C for 24 hYes[18]
HEV-3A549Real-time RT-PCR for cellular HEV RNA60 °C for 72 hNo[18]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)95 °C for 1 minNo[54]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)90 °C for 1 minNo[54]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)85 °C for 1 minNo[54]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)80 °C for 1 minNo[54]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)75 °C for 1 minNo[54]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)70 °C for 1 minNo[54]
HEV-3iPLC/PRF/5, A549, HepG2Real-time RT-PCR, Focus-forming units (ffu)No heatNo[54]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)37 °C for 21 daysNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)Room temperature for 28 daysNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)4 °C for 56 daysNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)No heat for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)37 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)50 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)55 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)60 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)65 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)70 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)75 °C for 1 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)80 °C for 1 minYes[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)85 °C for 1 minYes[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)90 °C for 1 minYes[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)70 °C for 1.5 minNo[28]
HEV-3cA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)70 °C for 2 min and longerYes[28]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM56 °C for 1 hNo[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM58 °C for 30 minNo[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM58 °C for 1 hYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM60 °C for 5 minNo[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM60 °C for 10 min and longerYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM62 °C for 60 minYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM63 °C for 1 minNo[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM63 °C for 5 minNo[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM63 °C for 30 minYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM65 °C for 1 minNo[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM65 °C for 5 minYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM70 °C for 1 minYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM70 °C for 5 minYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM75 °C for 1 minYes[55]
HEV-3kPLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM80 °C for 1 minYes[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM60 °C for 1 minNo[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM63 °C for 1 minNo[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM63 °C for 5 minNo[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM63 °C for 30 minYes[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM65 °C for 1 minNo[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM65 °C for 5 minYes[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM70 °C for 1 minNo[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM70 °C for 5 minYes[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM75 °C for 1 minYes[55]
HEV-4PLC/PRF/5Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM80 °C for 1 minYes[55]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)4 °C for 1 weekNo[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)10 °C for 1 weekNo[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)21 °C for 1 weekNo[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)21 °C for 2 weeksYes[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)65 °C for 10 minYes[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)65 °C for 20 minYes[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)71 °C for 10 minYes[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)71 °C for 20 minYes[56]
HEV-3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)80 °C for 10 minYes[56]
HEV-3eA549/D3Focus-forming units (ffu)80 °C for 20 minYes[56]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM4 °C for 12 weeksNo[57]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM-20 °C for 12 weeksNo[57]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM56 °C for 1 hNo[57]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM65 °C for 1 hNo[57]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM72 °C for 12 minYes[57]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM72 °C for 1 hYes[57]
HEV-3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM95 °C for 1 minNo[57]
HEV-3c/3eA549Real-time RT-PCR for HEV RNA in CM95 °C for 3 minYes[57]
HEV-3cA549Focus-forming units (ffu)(Sausage) 70 °C for 21 min in water bathNo[58]
HEV-3cA549Focus-forming units (ffu)(Sausage Core) 70 °C for 23 min in water bathYes[58]
Refs., references; TCID50, 50% tissue culture infective dose; CPE, cytopathic effect; CM, conditioned medium. HEV-3 subtypes were classified, according to the reference [59].
Figure 1. The thermal inactivation of the hepatitis E virus (HEV). (a) Results from cell culture systems. Refs. [18,28,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,60]. (b) Results from pig bioassays. Refs. [22,23]. The representative data, equal to or less than 60 min, were used. Circle, inactivation; cross, non-inactivation.
Figure 1. The thermal inactivation of the hepatitis E virus (HEV). (a) Results from cell culture systems. Refs. [18,28,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,60]. (b) Results from pig bioassays. Refs. [22,23]. The representative data, equal to or less than 60 min, were used. Circle, inactivation; cross, non-inactivation.
Viruses 17 00702 g001

3. Thermal Stability of Hepatitis E Virus in Pig Bioassays

Feagins et al. [45] reported that pigs inoculated with two of the three HEV RNA-PCR-positive pig-liver homogenates became HEV-infected, as evidenced by the detection of fecal virus shedding, viremia, and seroconversion. This model is a useful pig bioassay that can evaluate infectious HEV. As positive controls, pigs were each inoculated i.v. with 1 mL of standard pig HEV-3 infectious stock with an infectious titer of 5 × 104.5 50% pig infectious doses [45].
Feagins et al. [22] examined the thermal stability of commercial pig liver homogenates (FL58 and FL91) containing HEV-3 using a pig bioassay. All the pigs were inoculated intravenously with 2 mL of liver homogenates from HEV-negative or HEV-contaminated livers. Four out of five of the pigs inoculated with HEV-3-positive liver homogenates incubated at 56 °C for 1 h became infected, meaning that incubation at 56 °C for 1 h cannot inactivate HEV-3, although stir-frying the meat at 191 °C (an internal temperature of 71 °C) for 5 min (n = 5) or boiling in water for 5 min (n = 5) led to no infection [22]. The starting/spiking concentrations of HEV RNA were not indicated [22].
Barnaud et al. [23] examined the industrial processing of pork products that had been experimentally contaminated with HEV-3e at various times and temperatures, and after treatment, the presence of residual infectious HEV particles was measured by real-time RT-PCR and in vivo experimental pig bioassays. The level of the HEV contamination of the liver was estimated to be 108 copies of HEV GE/g [23]. They revealed that heating food to an internal temperature of at least 71 °C for 20 min is necessary to completely inactivate HEV, but HEV fecal excretion and HEV seroconversion were observed in the foods after heating to an internal temperature of 71 °C for 10 min. All the pigs were inoculated intravenously in the ear with 2 mL of virus suspension [23].
Pig bioassays are useful for the study of the thermal stability of HEV (Figure 1b); however, this approach may not be particularly convenient due to its costs and certain ethical problems.

4. Thermal Stability of Hepatitis E Virus in Plasma Products

Yunoki et al. [18] reported dry heating at 80 °C to be effective for the inactivation of HEV, supporting the previous report that freeze-drying followed by dry heat treatment at 80 °C for 72 h was effective in inactivating a wide range of enveloped and nonenveloped viruses [61]. The inactivation patterns of HEV at 60 °C with albumin and fibrinogen were similar to those of canine parvovirus, which is used as a model of heat-resistant viruses, suggesting that HEV is a heat-resistant virus [18]. Yunoki et al. [18] used 4–6 non-detectable, end-point infectious HEV (log/mL). It is insufficient to inactive HEV in plasma products/plasma derivatives featuring factor (F)VIII by heating at 60 °C alone [62,63]. Yunoki et al. [62] initially used a 6–8 log virus infectivity of HEV-3. Satake et al. reported that the lowest HEV RNA dose associated with transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E presence in fresh frozen plasma is 36,000 IU of HEV RNA [64]. As the pasteurization of an HEV-positive plasma derivative at 60 °C for 10 h leads to an effective reduction in infectivity, resulting in a von Willebrand Factor (VWF)/FVIII product with a margin of safety suitable only for HEV [64,65,66,67], more safety methods should be developed to inactivate HEV. Dähnert et al. [65] performed pig bioassays, and pasteurization at 60 °C for 10 h of HEV-positive plasma derivatives could lead to the effective reduction of infectivity. The HEV copy numbers in the liver homogenate had an HEV load of 3.9 × 103 RNA copies/μL, and the intermediate spike of 1:11 had an approximately 10-fold lower HEV RNA concentration [65].

5. Discussion

The thermal stability of HEV in cell cultures seems to depend on HEV strains/(sub)genotypes, starting concentrations of HEV, cell types, HEV detection methods, and so on. Starting/spiking concentrations of HEV could affect inactivation kinetics. The cell culture associated with HEV has difficulties, such as the limited susceptibility of cell lines and the potential for adaptation [53]. Schielke et al. [54] reported the incomplete inactivation of HEV even at 95 °C, which contrasts with other studies. They used RNase treatment followed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR to differentiate disassembled from intact viral particles. The presence of intact viral particles does not necessarily equate to infectivity. It is possible that studies relying on real-time PCR may also assess impaired viral particles. It is possible that the viability procedure could explain some discrepancies [60].
The data of the present article may help to estimate the stability of HEV in the environment or food. It is shown here that heat treatment at 95 °C for 10 min prior to the inoculation of PLC/PRF/5 cells could lead to HEV RNA being undetectable throughout the observation period of 50 days after inoculation [49]. At present, heat inactivation at 95 °C for 10 min is the safest approach for the inactivation of HEV (Figure 1a) [11]. Further studies will be needed to confirm this observation.
We reviewed the thermal inactivation of four major HEV genotypes: HEV-1, HEV-2, HEV-3, and HEV-4. It has been reported that HEV-7 is also a causative agent for human hepatitis E [68,69]. The consumption of camel-derived food products may link to post-transplantation chronic hepatitis E [68]. Further studies of the heat inactivation of HEV-7 are needed.
There are two forms of HEV particles: eHEV and neHEV [70]. As cell-culture-derived HEV is often eHEV, it may be possible that eHEV has a similar thermal inactivation pattern as neHEV, which mainly exists in bile or feces. Further studies are needed regarding this point.
The consumption of innards, offal, organ meat, and various other meats is linked to hepatitis E [71], and eating them represents a risk factor for HEV infection [72]. The heat inactivation of HEV is also important before eating the innards, offal, organ meat, and a variety of other meats (aside from liver) from pigs.
At present, HEV transmission through the food chain is a critical source of infection; HEV-3 and HEV-4 have wide host ranges and pose a great risk of infection, especially for high-risk groups, and surveillance is important to examine the prevalence and infectivity of HEV-3 and HEV-4 in food products [13]. The bloodborne transmission of HEV poses a great risk, especially for high-risk groups [13], and HEV screening in blood donors is also important [19,35,36]. HEV countermeasures, including vaccines and antivirals, should be developed [73].

6. Future Perspectives

Between the harvesting and consuming stages, in general, food can become contaminated by bacteria, parasites, and viruses, including HEV [74]. To identify the relevant foodborne pathogens, there are several conventional and advanced methods. Culture-, biochemical test-, immunological-, and nucleic acid-based methods represent the conventional ones, while hybridization-, array-, spectroscopy-, and biosensor-based methods are more advanced (Table 2) [74,75]. The gold standard detection method for foodborne pathogens in the food industry is based on rapid PCR screening [76].
Bennett et al. [50] reported that when applying the recommended cooking times (71 °C for 2 min; 71 °C for 30 sec; and no cooking), the per serving exposure outcomes for HEV in pig liver (97.5th percentile (95% CI)) were expected to be 109 copies/g, 376 copies/g, and 1157 copies/g, respectively, meaning that heating at 71 °C for short time does not completely achieve inactivation. Heating at 70–72 °C for 2 min significantly reduces HEV infectious titers but often does not result in a >4 log10 decrease [75].
Detailed analyses of HEV have been hampered by the absence of viral cell culture systems capable of detecting low-titer viruses. It is possible that foodborne HEV may not replicate efficiently in conventional in vitro culture systems. At present, the thermal inactivation of HEV-contaminated food products requires heating at temperatures above 70 °C for at least 23 min to achieve the effective inactivation of HEV [58]. However, the thermal stability of HEV varies significantly depending on the viral strain, food matrix, and specific heating condition [75]. Heating at 95 °C for 10 min may represent a more reliable method for ensuring the complete inactivation of HEV in food. Therefore, it is critical that consumers are informed about appropriate heat-treatment protocols and durations to effectively eliminate HEV from food products.

7. Conclusions

A vaccine for hepatitis E is currently available in China and Pakistan. The effective inactivation of infectious HEV is critical for ensuring the safety of drinking water and food products. HEV RNA has been detected in various porcine-derived food products, including intestines and livers, suggesting the potential for these products to act as sources of HEV transmission. The thermal stability of HEV has been demonstrated in both cell culture systems and pig bioassays. The heat treatment of HEV-contaminated foods at 95 °C for 10 min or 70 °C for at least 23 min has been suggested as an effective strategy for viral inactivation. However, standardized thermal inactivation methods for HEV in plasma-derived products have not yet been established. NAT is useful for preventing transfusion-transmitted HEV infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.O.; methodology, T.K.; software, T.K.; validation, T.K. and H.O.; formal analysis, T.K. and H.O.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K. and H.O.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and H.O.; supervision, H.O.; funding acquisition, T.K. and H.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), grant numbers: JP24fk0210132, JP25fk0210132 (Kanda T. and Okamoto H.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HEVhepatitis E virus
NATNucleic acid testing
CPEcytopathic effect
ffufocus-forming units
GEsgenome equivalents
RT-PCRReverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction
TCID50A 50% tissue culture infective dose

References

  1. Balayan, M.S.; Andjaparidze, A.G.; Savinskaya, S.S.; Ketiladze, E.S.; Braginsky, D.M.; Savinov, A.P.; Poleschuk, V.F. Evidence for a virus in non-A, non-B hepatitis transmitted via the fecal-oral route. Intervirology 1983, 20, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reyes, G.R.; Purdy, M.A.; Kim, J.P.; Luk, K.C.; Young, L.M.; Fry, K.E.; Bradley, D.W. Isolation of a cDNA from the virus responsible for enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis. Science 1990, 247, 1335–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Takahashi, K.; Iwata, K.; Watanabe, N.; Hatahara, T.; Ohta, Y.; Baba, K.; Mishiro, S. Full-genome nucleotide sequence of a hepatitis E virus strain that may be indigenous to Japan. Virology 2001, 287, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kamar, N.; Selves, J.; Mansuy, J.M.; Ouezzani, L.; Péron, J.M.; Guitard, J.; Cointault, O.; Esposito, L.; Abravanel, F.; Danjoux, M.; et al. Hepatitis E virus and chronic hepatitis in organ-transplant recipients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ma, Z.; de Man, R.A.; Kamar, N.; Pan, Q. Chronic hepatitis E: Advancing research and patient care. J. Hepatol. 2022, 77, 1109–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kumar, A.; Beniwal, M.; Kar, P.; Sharma, J.B.; Murthy, N.S. Hepatitis E in pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004, 85, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ohnishi, S.; Kang, J.H.; Maekubo, H.; Takahashi, K.; Mishiro, S. A case report: Two patients with fulminant hepatitis E in Hokkaido, Japan. Hepatol. Res. 2003, 25, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fukae, J.; Tsugawa, J.; Ouma, S.; Umezu, T.; Kusunoki, S.; Tsuboi, Y. Guillain-Barré and Miller Fisher syndromes in patients with anti-hepatitis E virus antibody: A hospital-based survey in Japan. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 37, 1849–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kamar, N.; Rostaing, L.; Abravanel, F.; Garrouste, C.; Lhomme, S.; Esposito, L.; Basse, G.; Cointault, O.; Ribes, D.; Nogier, M.B.; et al. Ribavirin therapy inhibits viral replication on patients with chronic hepatitis e virus infection. Gastroenterology 2010, 139, 1612–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kamar, N.; Abravanel, F.; Garrouste, C.; Cardeau-Desangles, I.; Mansuy, J.M.; Weclawiak, H.; Izopet, J.; Rostaing, L. Three-month pegylated interferon-alpha-2a therapy for chronic hepatitis E virus infection in a haemodialysis patient. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 2792–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kanda, T.; Li, T.C.; Takahashi, M.; Nagashima, S.; Primadharsini, P.P.; Kunita, S.; Sasaki-Tanaka, R.; Inoue, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Nakamoto, S.; et al. Recent advances in hepatitis E virus research and the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for hepatitis E virus infection. Hepatol. Res. 2024, 54, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, W.; Wu, W.; Chen, M.; Teng, Z. Prevalence of hepatitis E virus in domestic animals in the Chinese mainland: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Vet. Res. 2025, 21, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Haase, J.A.; Schlienkamp, S.; Ring, J.J.; Steinmann, E. Transmission patterns of hepatitis E virus. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2025, 70, 101451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bienz, M.; Renaud, C.; Liu, J.R.; Wong, P.; Pelletier, P. Hepatitis E Virus in the United States and Canada: Is It Time to Consider Blood Donation Screening? Transfus. Med. Rev. 2024, 38, 150835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. World Health Organization. Hepatitis E. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-e (accessed on 21 March 2025).
  16. Flores, G.; Juárez, J.C.; Montoro, J.B.; Tusell, J.M.; Altisent, C.; Juste, C.; Jardí, R. Seroprevalence of parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis A virus and hepatitis E virus antibodies in haemophiliacs treated exclusively with clotting-factor concentrates considered safe against human immunodeficiency and hepatitis C viruses. Haemophilia 1995, 1, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Toyoda, H.; Honda, T.; Hayashi, K.; Katano, Y.; Goto, H.; Kumada, T.; Takahashi, K.; Abe, N.; Mishiro, S.; Takamatsu, J. Prevalence of hepatitis E virus IgG antibody in Japanese patients with hemophilia. Intervirology 2008, 51, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yunoki, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Tanaka, H.; Nishigaki, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Nishida, A.; Adan-Kubo, J.; Tsujikawa, M.; Hattori, S.; Urayama, T.; et al. Extent of hepatitis E virus elimination is affected by stabilizers present in plasma products and pore size of nanofilters. Vox Sang. 2008, 95, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Owada, T.; Kaneko, M.; Matsumoto, C.; Sobata, R.; Igarashi, M.; Suzuki, K.; Matsubayashi, K.; Mio, K.; Uchida, S.; Satake, M.; et al. Establishment of culture systems for Genotypes 3 and 4 hepatitis E virus (HEV) obtained from human blood and application of HEV inactivation using a pathogen reduction technology system. Transfusion 2014, 54, 2820–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Praditya, D.; Friesland, M.; Gravemann, U.; Handke, W.; Todt, D.; Behrendt, P.; Müller, T.H.; Steinmann, E.; Seltsam, A. Hepatitis E virus is effectively inactivated in platelet concentrates by ultraviolet C light. Vox Sang. 2020, 115, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kapsch, A.M.; Farcet, M.R.; Wieser, A.; Ahmad, M.Q.; Miyabayashi, T.; Baylis, S.A.; Blümel, J.; Kreil, T.R. Antibody-enhanced hepatitis E virus nanofiltration during the manufacture of human immunoglobulin. Transfusion 2020, 60, 2500–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feagins, A.R.; Opriessnig, T.; Guenette, D.K.; Halbur, P.G.; Meng, X.J. Inactivation of infectious hepatitis E virus present in commercial pig livers sold in local grocery stores in the United States. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barnaud, E.; Rogée, S.; Garry, P.; Rose, N.; Pavio, N. Thermal inactivation of infectious hepatitis E virus in experimentally contaminated food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5153–5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Jung, U.S.; Lee, S.; Hong, G.P.; Choi, M.J. Effect of Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) Irradiation on Foodborne Pathogen Inactivation in Prosciutto and Changes on Its Physicochemical Properties. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2025, 45, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Girones, R.; Carratalà, A.; Calgua, B.; Calvo, M.; Rodriguez-Manzano, J.; Emerson, S. Chlorine inactivation of hepatitis E virus and human adenovirus 2 in water. J. Water Health 2014, 12, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Guerrero-Latorre, L.; Gonzales-Gustavson, E.; Hundesa, A.; Sommer, R.; Rosina, G. Thermal Stability of Hepatitis E Virus as Estimated by a Cell Culture Method. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Devhare, P.B.; Chatterjee, S.N.; Arankalle, V.A.; Lole, K.S. Analysis of antiviral response in human epithelial cells infected with hepatitis E virus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Johne, R.; Trojnar, E.; Filter, M.; Hofmann, J. Thermal Stability of Hepatitis E Virus as Estimated by a Cell Culture Method. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 4225–4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nasheri, N.; Doctor, T.; Chen, A.; Harlow, J.; Gill, A. Evaluation of High-Pressure Processing in Inactivation of the Hepatitis E Virus. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhuang, C.; Liu, X.; Huang, X.; Lu, J.; Zhu, K.; Liao, M.; Chen, L.; Jiang, H.; Zang, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Effectiveness of a hepatitis E vaccine against medically-attended symptomatic infection in HBsAg-positive adults from a test-negative design study. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Baylis, S.A.; Hanschmann, K.M.; Blümel, J.; Nübling, C.M.; HEV Collaborative Study Group. Standardization of hepatitis E virus (HEV) nucleic acid amplification technique-based assays: An initial study to evaluate a panel of HEV strains and investigate laboratory performance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 1234–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vollmer, T.; Diekmann, J.; Johne, R.; Eberhardt, M.; Knabbe, C.; Dreier, J. Novel approach for detection of hepatitis E virus infection in German blood donors. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2708–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Baylis, S.A.; Blümel, J.; Mizusawa, S.; Matsubayashi, K.; Sakata, H.; Okada, Y.; Nübling, C.M.; Hanschmann, K.M.; HEV Collaborative Study Group. World Health Organization International Standard to harmonize assays for detection of hepatitis E virus RNA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Baylis, S.A.; Terao, E.; Blümel, J.; Hanschmann, K.O. Collaborative study for the establishment of the Ph. Eur. Hepatitis E virus RNA for NAT testing biological reference preparation batch 1. Pharmeur Bio Sci. Notes. 2017, 2017, 12–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Baylis, S.A.; Hanschmann, K.O.; Matsubayashi, K.; Sakata, H.; Roque-Afonso, A.M.; Kaiser, M.; Corman, V.M.; Kamili, S.; Aggarwal, R.; Trehanpati, N.; et al. Development of a World Health Organization International Reference Panel for different genotypes of hepatitis E virus for nucleic acid amplification testing. J. Clin. Virol. 2019, 119, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sakata, H.; Matsubayashi, K.; Iida, J.; Nakauchi, K.; Kishimoto, S.; Sato, S.; Ikuta, K.; Satake, M.; Kino, S. Trends in hepatitis E virus infection: Analyses of the long-term screening of blood donors in Hokkaido, Japan, 2005–2019. Transfusion 2021, 61, 3390–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tanaka, A.; Matsubayashi, K.; Odajima, T.; Sakata, H.; Iida, J.; Kai, K.; Goto, N.; Satake, M. Universal nucleic acid donor screening revealed epidemiological features of hepatitis E and prevented transfusion-transmitted infection in Japan. Transfusion 2024, 64, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yazaki, Y.; Mizuo, H.; Takahashi, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Sasaki, N.; Gotanda, Y.; Okamoto, H. Sporadic acute or fulminant hepatitis E in Hokkaido, Japan, may be food-borne, as suggested by the presence of hepatitis E virus in pig liver as food. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 2351–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mizuo, H.; Yazaki, Y.; Sugawara, K.; Tsuda, F.; Takahashi, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Okamoto, H. Possible risk factors for the transmission of hepatitis E virus and for the severe form of hepatitis E acquired locally in Hokkaido, Japan. J. Med. Virol. 2005, 76, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Okano, H.; Takahashi, M.; Isono, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Nakano, T.; Oya, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Ito, K.; Ohmori, S.; Maegawa, T.; et al. Characterization of sporadic acute hepatitis E and comparison of hepatitis E virus genomes in acute hepatitis patients and pig liver sold as food in Mie, Japan. Hepatol. Res. 2014, 44, E63–E76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wenzel, J.J.; Preiss, J.; Schemmerer, M.; Huber, B.; Plentz, A.; Jilg, W. Detection of hepatitis E virus (HEV) from porcine livers in Southeastern Germany and high sequence homology to human HEV isolates. J. Clin. Virol. 2011, 52, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pallerla, S.R.; Schembecker, S.; Meyer, C.G.; Linh, L.T.K.; Johne, R.; Wedemeyer, H.; Bock, C.T.; Kremsner, P.G.; Velavan, T.P. Hepatitis E virus genome detection in commercial pork livers and pork meat products in Germany. J. Viral Hepat. 2021, 28, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Di Bartolo, I.; Angeloni, G.; Ponterio, E.; Ostanello, F.; Ruggeri, F.M. Detection of hepatitis E virus in pork liver sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 193, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gutiérrez-Vergara, C.; Quintero, J.; Duarte, J.F.; Suescún, J.P.; López-Herrera, A. Detection of hepatitis E virus genome in pig livers in Antioquia, Colombia. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 2890–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Feagins, A.R.; Opriessnig, T.; Guenette, D.K.; Halbur, P.G.; Meng, X.J. Detection and characterization of infectious Hepatitis E virus from commercial pig livers sold in local grocery stores in the USA. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cossaboom, C.M.; Heffron, C.L.; Cao, D.; Yugo, D.M.; Houk-Miles, A.E.; Lindsay, D.S.; Zajac, A.M.; Bertke, A.S.; Elvinger, F.; Meng, X.J. Risk factors and sources of foodborne hepatitis E virus infection in the United States. J. Med. Virol. 2016, 88, 1641–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bouwknegt, M.; Lodder-Verschoor, F.; van der Poel, W.H.; Rutjes, S.A.; de Roda Husman, A.M. Hepatitis E virus RNA in commercial porcine livers in The Netherlands. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 2889–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kulkarni, M.A.; Arankalle, V.A. The detection and characterization of hepatitis E virus in pig livers from retail markets of India. J. Med. Virol. 2008, 80, 1387–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Colson, P.; Borentain, P.; Queyriaux, B.; Kaba, M.; Moal, V.; Gallian, P.; Heyries, L.; Raoult, D.; Gerolami, R. Pig liver sausage as a source of hepatitis E virus transmission to humans. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bennett, C.; Coughlan, S.; Hunt, K.; Butler, F.; Fanning, S.; Ryan, E.; De Gascun, C.; O’Gorman, J. Detection of hepatitis E RNA in pork products at point of retail in Ireland—Are consumers at risk? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 410, 110492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Huang, R.; Li, D.; Wei, S.; Li, Q.; Yuan, X.; Geng, L.; Li, X.; Liu, M. Cell culture of sporadic hepatitis E virus in China. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 1999, 6, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Emerson, S.U.; Arankalle, V.A.; Purcell, R.H. Thermal stability of hepatitis E virus. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 930–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tanaka, T.; Takahashi, M.; Kusano, E.; Okamoto, H. Development and evaluation of an efficient cell-culture system for Hepatitis E virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schielke, A.; Filter, M.; Appel, B.; Johne, R. Thermal stability of hepatitis E virus assessed by a molecular biological approach. Virol. J. 2011, 8, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Imagawa, T.; Sugiyama, R.; Shiota, T.; Li, T.C.; Yoshizaki, S.; Wakita, T.; Ishii, K. Evaluation of Heating Conditions for Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus Genotypes 3 and 4. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 947–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Stunnenberg, M.; Huizen, S.C.V.; Swart, A.; Lodder, W.J.; Boxman, I.L.A.; Rutjes, S.A. Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Products Estimated with a Semiquantitative Infectivity Assay. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Monini, M.; Ianiro, G.; De Sabato, L.; Bivona, M.; Ostanello, F.; Di Bartolo, I. Persistence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) subtypes 3c and 3e: Long-term cold storage and heat treatments. Food Microbiol. 2024, 121, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Schilling-Loeffler, K.; Meyer, D.; Wolff, A.; Santamaría-Palacios, J.; Reich, F.; Johne, R. Determination of hepatitis E virus inactivation during manufacturing of spreadable pork liver sausage and salami-like raw pork sausage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2025, 429, 111018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Smith, D.B.; Simmonds, P.; Izopet, J.; Oliveira-Filho, E.F.; Ulrich, R.G.; Johne, R.; Koenig, M.; Jameel, S.; Harrison, T.J.; Meng, X.J.; et al. Proposed reference sequences for hepatitis E virus subtypes. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Randazzo, W.; Vasquez-García, A.; Aznar, R.; Sánchez, G. Viability RT-qPCR to Distinguish Between HEV and HAV With Intact and Altered Capsids. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Roberts, P.L.; Dunkerley, C.; McAuley, A.; Winkelman, L. Effect of manufacturing process parameters on virus inactivation by dry heat treatment at 80 degrees C in factor VIII. Vox Sang. 2007, 92, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yunoki, M.; Tanaka, H.; Takahashi, K.; Urayama, T.; Hattori, S.; Ideno, S.; Furuki, R.; Sakai, K.; Hagiwara, K.; Ikuta, K. Hepatitis E virus derived from different sources exhibits different behaviour in virus inactivation and/or removal studies with plasma derivatives. Biologicals 2016, 44, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Farcet, M.R.; Lackner, C.; Antoine, G.; Rabel, P.O.; Wieser, A.; Flicker, A.; Unger, U.; Modrof, J.; Kreil, T.R. Hepatitis E virus and the safety of plasma products: Investigations into the reduction capacity of manufacturing processes. Transfusion 2016, 56, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Satake, M.; Matsubayashi, K.; Hoshi, Y.; Taira, R.; Furui, Y.; Kokudo, N.; Akamatsu, N.; Yoshizumi, T.; Ohkohchi, N.; Okamoto, H.; et al. Unique clinical courses of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E in patients with immunosuppression. Transfusion 2017, 57, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dähnert, L.; Schlosser, J.; Fast, C.; Fröhlich, A.; Gröner, A.; Lange, E.; Roth, N.J.; Schäfer, W.; Schröder, C.; Eiden, M.; et al. Hepatitis E virus: Efficacy of pasteurization of plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrate determined by pig bioassay. Transfusion 2021, 61, 1266–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gallian, P.; Pouchol, E.; Djoudi, R.; Lhomme, S.; Mouna, L.; Gross, S.; Bierling, P.; Assal, A.; Kamar, N.; Mallet, V.; et al. Transfusion-Transmitted Hepatitis E Virus Infection in France. Transfus. Med. Rev. 2019, 33, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gallian, P.; Lhomme, S.; Morel, P.; Gross, S.; Mantovani, C.; Hauser, L.; Tinard, X.; Pouchol, E.; Djoudi, R.; Assal, A.; et al. Risk for Hepatitis E Virus Transmission by Solvent/Detergent-Treated Plasma. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2881–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lee, G.H.; Tan, B.H.; Teo, E.C.; Lim, S.G.; Dan, Y.Y.; Wee, A.; Aw, P.P.; Zhu, Y.; Hibberd, M.L.; Tan, C.K.; et al. Chronic Infection with Camelid Hepatitis E Virus in a Liver Transplant Recipient Who Regularly Consumes Camel Meat and Milk. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 355–357.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Guo, Y.; Yang, F.; Xu, X.; Feng, M.; Liao, Y.; He, Z.; Takeda, N.; Muramatsu, M.; Li, Q.; Li, T.C. Immunization of human hepatitis E viruses conferred protection against challenge by a camel hepatitis E virus. Vaccine 2020, 38, 7316–7322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Okamoto, H. Culture systems for hepatitis E virus. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 48, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Fantilli, A.; López Villa, S.D.; Zerega, A.; Di Cola, G.; López, L.; Wassaf Martínez, M.; Pisano, M.B.; Ré, V.E. Hepatitis E virus infection in a patient with alcohol related chronic liver disease: A case report of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Virol. J. 2021, 18, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wichmann, O.; Schimanski, S.; Koch, J.; Kohler, M.; Rothe, C.; Plentz, A.; Jilg, W.; Stark, K. Phylogenetic and case-control study on hepatitis E virus infection in Germany. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 1732–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sasaki-Tanaka, R.; Kanda, T.; Yokoo, T.; Abe, H.; Hayashi, K.; Sakamaki, A.; Kamimura, H.; Terai, S. Hepatitis A and E Viruses Are Important Agents of Acute Severe Hepatitis in Asia: A Narrative Review. Pathogens 2025, 14, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kabiraz, M.P.; Majumdar, P.R.; Mahmud, M.M.C.; Bhowmik, S.; Ali, A. Conventional and advanced detection techniques of foodborne pathogens: A comprehensive review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Johne, R.; Scholz, J.; Falkenhagen, A. Heat stability of foodborne viruses—Findings, methodological challenges and current developments. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 413, 110582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Velusamy, V.; Arshak, K.; Korostynska, O.; Oliwa, K.; Adley, C. An overview of foodborne pathogen detection: In the perspective of biosensors. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 232–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. The detection of hepatitis E virus RNA in pig products, including intestines and livers, which are sold in grocery stores.
Table 1. The detection of hepatitis E virus RNA in pig products, including intestines and livers, which are sold in grocery stores.
CountriesFoodstuffsPrevalence (%)/Total NYear, Refs.
JapanRaw pig liver7 (1.9%)/3632003, [38]
JapanRaw pig liver12 (4.9%)/2432014, [40]
United StatesPig liver14 (11%)/1272007, [45]
NetherlandsPig liver4 (6.5%)622007, [47]
IndiaPig liver2 (0.8%)/2402008, [48]
GermanyPig liver8 (4%)/2002011, [41]
GermanyPig products (liver, liver sausages, liver pate samples, etc.)13 (10%)/1302021, [42]
FranceRaw figatellu (a traditional pig liver sausage)7 (58.3%)/122010, [49]
ItalyRaw pig liver sausages10 (22.2%)/452015, [43]
ItalyDry pig liver sausages1 (4.3%)/232015, [43]
ColombiaPig liver from slaughterhouses62 (41.3%)/1502015, [44]
ColumbiaPig liver from grocery stores25 (25%)/1002015, [44]
IrelandPig products9 (4.8%)/1882024, [50]
IrelandPig liver6 (24%)/252024, [50]
IrelandFermented sausage (pig)1 (2.0%)/492024, [50]
IrelandPig sausage (27 g)1 (1.5%)/652024, [50]
IrelandPig sausage (72 g)1 (2.0%)/492024, [50]
N, number. Refs., references.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanda, T.; Okamoto, H. Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus: A Narrative Review. Viruses 2025, 17, 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050702

AMA Style

Kanda T, Okamoto H. Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus: A Narrative Review. Viruses. 2025; 17(5):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanda, Tatsuo, and Hiroaki Okamoto. 2025. "Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus: A Narrative Review" Viruses 17, no. 5: 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050702

APA Style

Kanda, T., & Okamoto, H. (2025). Thermal Inactivation of Hepatitis E Virus: A Narrative Review. Viruses, 17(5), 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop