Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variant-Specific Neutralizing Antibodies Following mRNA Vaccination and Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: López-Ferber et al. Baculovirus Genetic Diversity and Population Structure. Viruses 2025, 17, 142
Previous Article in Journal
Return of the Biennial Circulation of Enterovirus D68 in Colorado Children in 2024 Following the Large 2022 Outbreak
Previous Article in Special Issue
La Jolla Virus: The Pathology and Transmission in Its Host Drosophila suzukii
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/v17050674
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Individual and Combined Entomopathogenic Activity of a Spodoptera frugiperda Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda Granulovirus on S. frugiperda Larvae

by
Magali Ordóñez-García
1,2,
Juan Carlos Bustillos-Rodríguez
1,2,*,
José de Jesús Ornelas-Paz
2,
Miguel Ángel Salas-Marina
3,
Octavio Jhonathan Cambero-Campos
4,
Carlos Horacio Acosta-Muñiz
2,
David Ignacio Berlanga-Reyes
2 and
Claudio Rios-Velasco
2,*
1
Tecnológico Nacional de México, Campus Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, Cuauhtémoc 31500, Chihuahua, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Campus Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua, Av. Río Conchos S/N, Parque Industrial, Cuauhtémoc 31570, Chihuahua, Mexico
3
Unidad Académica Villacorzo, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, Km 3.0 Carretera Villacorzo-Ejido Monterrey, Villacorzo 30520, Chiapas, Mexico
4
Unidad Académica de Agricultura, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Carretera Tepic-Compostela Km 9.0, Xalisco 63155, Nayarit, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2025, 17(5), 674; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050674
Submission received: 28 March 2025 / Revised: 2 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 May 2025 / Published: 5 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insect Viruses and Pest Management, the Third Edition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The bioinsecticidal activity of several doses of a Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (SfMNPV-CH-32; LD10, LD50, and LD90) and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda granulovirus (SfGV-CH13; LD50 and LD90), alone and in co-infection, was evaluated on S. frugiperda larvae. In the co-infection assays, one virus was applied at 0 h, and then the second virus was supplied at different times (0, 12, and 24 h) in order to test the effect of the co-infection time on the insecticidal activity of the viruses. The symptoms observed in the co-infected larvae depended on the viral dose supplied at 0 h. The larvae treated with the highest dose (LD90) of SfMNPV-CH32 and co-infected with SfGV-CH13 at LD50 showed symptoms of nucleopolyhedrovirus infection at 14 days post-infection. The larvae initially infected with the highest dose of SfGV-CH13 (LD90) and subsequently co-infected with SfMNPV-CH32 (LD50 and LD10) showed infection symptoms characteristic of both viruses. The insecticidal activity of SfGV-CH13 and SfMNPV-CH32 alone or in combination depended on the viral doses and the time elapsed between the first and second inoculation. An antagonistic effect was observed for most of the treatments tested. A synergistic effect was observed only in treatment 10, where the larvae were first infected with SfMNPV-CH32 at a high dose (LD90) and inoculated 24 h later with SfGV-CH13 (LD50).

1. Introduction

The fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is the main pest of maize (corn; Zea mays L.) and other crops in Mexico and other countries, causing crop losses exceeding 30% [1,2,3,4,5]. The control of this insect has been based on chemical insecticides, which cause adverse effects on human health and the environment, with the latter including the elimination of beneficial insects [6]. This has resulted in a search for eco-friendly methods to control the FAW. The use of natural enemies (fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes, protozoa, parasitoids, and predator insects) of the FAW as control strategies has advantages over chemical pesticides [7]. The members of the family Baculoviridae are known among entomopathogenic viruses as excellent biocontrol agents of this pest, and have been considered primary components in lepidopteran pest management programs [8]. The Baculoviridae family groups four genera, with the Alphabaculovirus (nucleopolyhedrovirus; NPV) and Betabaculovirus (granulovirus; GV) genera being lepidopteran-specific, and the most widely distributed and studied worldwide [9,10]. The biological activity of NPVs and GVs has widely been documented on many lepidopteran pests [11,12,13,14,15]. NPV isolates are the most used and studied as control agents of the FAW [3,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The widespread use of S. frugiperda NPVs is a consequence of their high virulence, infecting several tissues at the same time (e.g., the fat body, tracheal matrix, and epidermis) and causing the death of the insect in a short time (four to six days), even at low doses of occlusion bodies (OBs) [22,23]. The use of Type I S. frugiperda GVs as agents for pest control has scarcely been documented [11,24,25]. Type I GVs mainly infect the fat body, causing the slow death of the insect [26]. Studies with other baculoviruses have demonstrated that the co-infection of insects with different types of these viruses can cause effects of potentiation, synergism, and antagonism [27,28,29]. Cuartas-Otálora et al. (2019) [30]. observed that NPV and GV mixtures increased the insecticidal efficacy of one or both. Some types of GVs can easily digest the peritrophic membrane of the insect by the enhancin protein (metalloprotease) present in their OBs, facilitating the access of virions of NPVs and other GVs into the intestinal cells and, consequently, increasing the insecticidal activity of these viruses [31,32]. The current knowledge on the insecticidal activity of NPV and GV co-infections in S. frugiperda is scarce and inconsistent [30]. The present study aimed to evaluate the insecticidal activity of a Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda granulovirus alone and in combination against FAW larvae at different doses and infection times.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

The FAW larvae were obtained from a laboratory colony which had been reared for 12 months (eight generations) in Cuauhtemoc, Chihuahua, Mexico. The colony was established using larvae collected from a maize plot (latitude 28°12′44″ N, longitude 106°59′45″ W, altitude 2125 m above sea level). The larvae were maintained under controlled conditions (26 ± 2 °C, >70% RH, 12:12 L:D photoperiod) and fed with an artificial diet (Southland Products Inc., Lake Village, AR, USA). The adult moths were fed with a sugar solution and maintained in 15 L cylindrical plastic containers.

2.2. Virus Propagation

A Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (SfMNPV-CH32) and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda granulovirus (SfGV-CH13) were used in the study. These isolates were described previously [3,24]. The viral isolates were propagated separately in fourth-instar FAW larvae by the droplet feeding method [33]. For the inoculation, 0.5 µL of viral suspension (~108 and ~1010 OBs of the NPV and GV, respectively) were supplied to larvae that had been starved for 12 h. The OBs were mixed with Fluorella blue (0.001%, w/v) and sucrose (10%, w/v) before use. The infected larvae were individually placed into 29.5 mL plastic cups containing an artificial diet and maintained under the controlled ambient conditions described above. The dead larvae were collected and stored at −20 °C. Then, these larvae were macerated in sterile mortars using sterile distilled water (SDW) containing 1 mg/mL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The larval cuticle was removed by filtration through muslin. The filtrates were placed into 10 mL polypropylene tubes and centrifuged (8500× g, 4 °C, 10 min). The pellet with the OBs was re-suspended in 10 mL of SDW and stored at −80 °C. Then, the OBs were purified by continuous sucrose gradients (40 and 66%, w/w) using a gradient former (CBS Scientific, Del Mar, USA, GM 200). Five milliliters of the viral suspension were deposited on the surface of 20 mL of the gradients previously collected into 30 mL polyallomer tubes and ultracentrifuged (40,310× g, 4 °C, 1.5 h). The bands containing the OBs were recovered using a Pasteur pipette and placed into 30 mL polypropylene tubes to be washed twice with SDW by ultracentrifugation (40,310× g, 4 °C, 40 min). Finally, the pure OBs were re-suspended in 1 mL aliquots of SDW and stored at −80 °C until use.

2.3. Bioassays

The insecticidal activity of SfGV-CH13 was evaluated using the median lethal doses of LD50 and LD90 at 45 days post-infection (dpi), and using the LD10, LD50, and LD90 for SfMNPV-CH32 at 14 dpi. The tested NPV and GV doses (Table 1) were previously determined [3,24].
The co-infection of third-instar (≈7 days after hatching) FAW larvae with the SfGV-CH13 and SfMNPV-CH32 baculoviruses was also evaluated. These bioassays were performed by supplying the lethal doses of both isolates at 0, 12, and 24 h after supplying the first virus (GV or NPV). All bioassays were performed using the droplet feeding method [33]. The FAW larvae used in the bioassays were starved for 12 h, and then supplied with 0.5 μL of the purified viral suspensions, previously counted in triplicate in a Neubauer chamber (Marienfeld, Germany) using a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, AxioScope A1; Gottingen, Germany) at 400 and 1000× magnifications for the NPV and GV, respectively [3,24,34]. The OBs were disaggregated by sonication (Branson 1510, CT, USA) for 30 s after being counted, and then mixed with Fluorella blue (0.001%, w/v) and sucrose (10%, w/v) before use in the bioassays. The co-infections and single infections contained the same doses of the NPV or GV.
In the case of the co-infection, the inoculation with both isolates (0.5 μL of each viral suspension) at 0 h was performed simultaneously. At 12 or 24 h, the viral suspensions were supplied as described in Table 2. At 12 and 24 h, the larvae infected with the first viral isolate were individually placed into 29.5 mL plastic cups and fed with an artificial diet for 4 h and 12 h, and then starved for 8 h and 12 h, respectively, before being supplied with 0.5 μL of the second viral suspension. At all time points, the larvae were maintained under the controlled ambient conditions described above. Only the larvae consuming the whole inoculum and showing a blue-colored intestinal tract, as confirmed by observation under a stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss 508, Oberkochen, Germany), were considered in the experiment. Dead larvae were recorded every 8 h until 14 dpi in all treatments. After this day, the larval mortality in the treatments with the GV alone (T1 and T2) and in the mixtures (T7–T20; Table 2) was monitored every 24 h until larval death (~58 d).
A total of 375 larvae were used for monitoring the individual biological activity of the lethal doses indicated above for the NPV and GV isolates, i.e., 75 larvae per treatment (T1–T5; Table 2), and 1125 larvae to monitor the effects of the virus mixtures (T6–T20) in the larvae at different times (0, 12, and 24 h; Table 2). Larvae (75) treated with 0.5 μL of Fluorella blue and sucrose solution were used as an absolute control group (T21; Table 2). The infected larvae were individually placed into 29.5 mL plastic cups, fed with the artificial diet, and maintained under the controlled ambient conditions described above.

2.4. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis

The experiment was conducted under a completely randomized design. In total, 21 treatments were evaluated in triplicate, using 25 larvae per replicate. The obtained data were analyzed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means were separated by a Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). The lethal doses and fiducial limit values were analyzed using log-probit regressions [35]. All data were analyzed using SAS software, version 9.0 [36].
The mortality values obtained 14 days after inoculation were used to determine the possible synergistic or antagonistic effects of SfMNPV-CH32 and SfGVs-CH13 in the mixtures, according to the Koppenhofer and Kaya formula [37].
EM = MSfMNPV + MSfGV (1 − MSfMNPV)
where M corresponds to the mortality caused by each virus alone, and EM corresponds to the expected mortality of the combination of both viruses. The resulting values from a chi-square test, χ2 = (MC − EM)2/EM, estimated using the mortality of the mixture (MC) were compared to the chi-square table value for 1 degree of freedom (χ2 = 3.841) (α = 0.05). If the value exceeded the table value, it was considered as a possible synergistic (positive value) or antagonistic (negative value) effect, depending on the differences in the D = (MC − EM) values.

3. Results

3.1. The Individual Insecticidal Activity of the Baculovirus

The untreated larvae did not die, and reached the pupal stage 14 days after starting the bioassays. The infection with GVs at LD50 and LD90 caused a larval mortality of 9.3% and 20% at 14 dpi and 46.7% and 93.2% at 45 dpi, respectively. The larval mortality with SfNPV-CH32 at LD10, LD50, and LD90 was 9.3, 52, and 86.7% at 14 dpi, respectively. The larval mortality percentages observed at the tested doses of both viral isolates were expected, based on the values obtained in the individual bioassays with both viral isolates. The larvae infected with SfGV-CH13 at LD50 and LD90 survived a long time (28 and 43 dpi, respectively) and showed typical symptoms of GV infection, including the cessation of feeding, slow movement, and a soft and yellowish-white (pale) cuticle (Figure 1a). On the other hand, the larvae infected with the SfNPV-CH32 isolate showed slow movement, vomiting, diarrhea, and lysis of their brown and black cuticle (Figure 1b), and some larvae stopped feeding after ~3 dpi.

3.2. The Insecticidal Activity of the Baculovirus Mixtures

The larvae infected with a high dose of NPV (LD90) and a medium dose of GV (LD50; Table 2) showed typical symptoms of NPV infection at 14 dpi, and after this time, they showed only symptoms of granulovirus infection. On the other hand, the larvae co-infected with the medium dose of the NPV (LD50) and the highest dose of the GV (LD90) (T11 to T15), as well as the larvae co-infected with the lowest dose of the NPV (LD10) and the highest dose of the GV (LD90) (T16 to T20), showed symptoms of infection with both viruses at 14 dpi.
The GVs at LD50 and LD90 are expressed as OBs/larva. These values were obtained from a minimum of six doses (treatments) and estimated at 45 days post-infection. The NPVs at LD10, LD50, and LD90 are expressed as OBs/larva. These values were obtained from a minimum of five doses (treatments) and estimated at 14 days post-infection. The probit regressions were fitted using the SAS program. χ2 = goodness of fit test; df = degrees of freedom; and SE = standard error.
The highest larval mortality at 14 dpi was observed in the larvae initially inoculated with the highest dose (LD90) of the NPV and, 24 h after, with the lowest dose (LD50) of the GV (T10) (Figure 2b). This mortality was similar to that caused by the NPV alone at the highest dose (T5) (Figure 2a) and by the larvae inoculated at the same time with the lowest dose (LD50) of the GV and the highest dose (LD90) of the NPV (T6).
However, in these three treatments (T5, T6, and T10), the maximum mortality was reached between 8 and 9 dpi (Figure 3a). Retarding for 12 and 24 h, co-infection with the NPV at the highest dose in the larvae previously infected with the lowest dose of the GV (T7 and T8) caused a gradual reduction in the larval mortality, which was of 60 and 54.7% in these treatments, respectively. This trend revealed an apparent effect of antagonism. This effect was observed since 6 dpi, when the larval mortality ranged from 10.7 to 21.8% for T7 and T8. These mortalities were significantly lower than that caused by infection with the NPV alone (82.7%) (T5) (Figure 3a). However, when the highest dose of the NPV was initially (0 h) applied in the larvae and co-infection with the lowest dose of the GV was retarded for 12 and 24 h (T9 and T10), the mortality gradually increased to 69.3 and 93.4%, respectively (Figure 2b).
On the other hand, when the viruses were applied at the same time, but their doses were inverted (T11), i.e., the GV at LD90 and the NPV at LD50, the mortality was lower than that observed for the co-infection assay involving the GV at LD50 and the NPV at LD90 (T5), demonstrating the high relevance of the NPV in infection development. All co-infection treatments involving the medium and highest doses (LD50 and LD90) of the NPV (T6–T15) caused a higher mortality than infection with the GV alone at all tested doses, independently of the infection time with the NPV. Retarding for 12 and 24 h, co-infection with the medium dose of the NPV (LD50) in the larvae previously infected with the highest dose of the GV (LD90) (T12 and T13) slightly reduced the larval mortality from 46.7 to 37.3 and 32%, as compared to when both viruses were supplied at the same time (T11). However, it was not significant, probably due to the advanced development of the GV infection. The mortality in the treatments involving these concentrations of the viruses (GV at LD90 and NPV at LD50) was only increased by firstly infecting the larvae with the NPV, and then retarding for 24 h the co-infection with the GV (T15) (Figure 2c).
The lowest mortality values in the co-infection assays were observed with the lowest concentration of the NPV (LD10) independently of the supplying time, reaffirming the importance of this virus in infection development (Figure 2d). The larvae co-infection with the highest dose of the GV (LD90) and the lowest dose of the NPV (LD10) at different inoculation times extended up to ~13 days (55 to 58 dpi) the larval survival time, as compared with the co-infections (~45 dpi) with the medium LD50 and highest LD90 doses of the NPV and GV. The mortality values were generally similar in the treatments involving this NPV (LD10) dose (T16–T20), except when co-infection with the NPV (T18) was retarded for 24 h in the larvae firstly infected with the highest dose of the GV (LD90). In this treatment, an increase in the larval mortality was observed, highlighting an increase in mortality of 22.7% compared to the expected value (10%) with the infection with the NPV alone at LD10 (Figure 2d and Figure 3c).

4. Discussion

No mortality was recorded for the control larvae of S. frugiperda (T21), which reached the pupal stage approximately 14 days after inoculation. Similar values were reported by Du Plessis et al. (2020) [38]. On the other hand, the infection symptoms varied with the treatment. The larvae treated only with the GV or NPV developed infection symptoms characteristic of each infecting virus, as reported by others [16,24,25,39]. The larvae treated with the highest dose (LD90) of the NPV and co-infected with the GV at LD50 (i.e., T5–T10) only showed symptoms of nucleopolyhedrovirus infection at 14 dpi, probably as a consequence of the high dose of the nucleopolyhedrovirus supplied to the larvae. Similarly, Cuartas-Otálora et al. (2019) [30] observed that the co-infection of larvae with high doses of the NPV and low doses of the GV of S. frugiperda supplied at the same time predominantly caused symptoms of nucleopolyhedrovirus infection. Similarly, Wennmann et al. (2015) [40] studied the interaction of Agrotis segetum nucleopolyhedrovirus B (AgseNPV-B) and an Agrotis segetum granulovirus (AgseGV) in neonate common cutworm Agrotis segetum larvae. They reported that at low NPV concentrations, the larvae died of granulosis, while at higher NPV concentrations, the larvae mostly died with polyhedra. Nevertheless, the larvae initially infected with the highest dose of the GV (LD90) and subsequently co-infected with the NPV (LD50 and LD10) at different times showed symptoms of infection characteristic of both viruses. In our study, the inoculation order defined the success of each viral isolate, as reported by others [41].
Different interaction effects were observed in the experiment, depending on the dose and inoculation time of each virus. The expected mortality values in most combinations suggested an antagonistic effect, except in treatment 10, where a synergistic effect was evident (Table 2). This effect of antagonism was observed in T7, T8, T12, and T13, causing a decrease in the larval mortality, probably because in these treatments, the replication of the GV started at 12 and 24 h compared to that of the NPV, causing a competition among the viruses for the same replication site [41].
This antagonistic effect has been scarcely documented in studies on the interactions of baculoviruses [29,42]. This effect has been widely documented in interactions between baculoviruses and parasitoid insects, finding that both compete for host resources and especially for replication sites, with the first of them to infect or parasitize the host causing the predominant effect [41]. Hackett et al. (2000) [29] documented an antagonistic impact on H. zea larvae co-infected with a Helicoverpa armigera granulovirus (HaGV-9.6 × 106 OBs per cup) and a Helicoverpa zea nucleopolyhedrovirus (HzSNPV-103 OBs per cup). They attributed the antagonism to a competition between both viruses for the resources of the host insect and the HaGV protein inhibiting the HzSNPV replication. They observed that the antagonistic effect was still present even when the HaGV was supplied 36 h after the HzSNPV, a time at which the nucleopolyhedrovirus should fully be established in the host and penetrate the peritrophic membrane. In our study, the antagonism effect was not observed when the GV was supplied 24 h after the delivery of the NPV (i.e., T10), probably due to the advanced replication level of the NPV, since nucleopolyhedroviruses replicate their DNA between 6 hpi and 18 dpi [42].
Several studies using two different baculoviruses have demonstrated increased viral mortality or synergistic effects on the target larvae compared to single infections [43]. A synergistic effect was observed in treatment 10, where the larvae were first supplied with SfMNPV-CH32 (LD50), and 24 h later, they were co-infected with SfGV-CH13 (LD90). An increase in the insecticidal activity of the NPV was observed in these treatments due to the co-infection. The synergism could be given due to the advantage of the NPV in the infection time, although the GV probably favored the NPV infection, as some granuloviruses can rapidly degrade the peritrophic membrane. Although in this study, the synergistic effect was observed when the viruses were placed 24 h apart, Barrera et al. (2021) [44] found a synergistic effect when both viruses (Spodoptera ornithogalli nucleopolyhedrovirus (SporNPV) and granulovirus (SporGV)) were co-inoculated into S. ornithogalli and S. frugiperda larvae [44]. Guo et al. (2007) [45] observed increases in the insecticidal capacity (virulence) of a Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SlNPV) on S. litura larvae when the larvae were co-infected with a granulovirus of Xestia c-nigrum (XcGV), noting the rupture of the peritrophic matrix in the larvae treated with the XcGV alone or with both viruses in co-infection. Cuartas-Otálora et al. [30] also documented an enhancement in the insecticidal activity (~27% larval mortality) after the co-infection of second-instar FAW larvae with the isolate SfCOL of a S. frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpfrMNPV) and low doses of the isolate VG008 of a S. frugiperda granulovirus (SpfrGV). They attributed this enhancement to proteins from the OBs of S. frugiperda granulovirus VG008, which caused holes in the peritrophic membrane, facilitating the access of NPV virions. On the other hand, an increase in the larval survival time was observed in some treatments (T17–T20) where the larvae were supplied either 12 or 24 h later with the lowest dose of the NPV (LD10) or 12 or 24 h later with the highest dose of the GV (LD90). These viral proportions might favor a higher number of OBs, since the larvae survived for more extended periods and probably reached a larger size, as reported previously [46]. Similar results were reported by Hackett et al. (2000) [29], who found that the survival time of H. zea larvae increased as the dose of the GV was increased. The increase in larval survival time could be associated with a sublethal effect of the Type I granulovirus, causing changes in the physiological processes related to developmental stages, development times, and larval death. However, the mechanisms driving the effects of these sublethal doses are poorly understood, and in most cases, the effects have been related to the hormonal and enzymatic changes associated with viral infections [47].

5. Conclusions

The results demonstrated that the inoculation time and dose influenced the insecticidal activity of SfMNPV. An antagonistic effect was observed in most treatments. The greatest antagonistic effect occurred when caused by a retardation of 12–24 h in the supply of higher doses (LD50 and LD90) of the SfMNPV-CH32 isolate to larvae previously infected with high doses (LD50 and LD90) of SfGV-CH13. A synergistic effect was caused by a high dose (LD50) of SfGV-CH13 supplied at 24 h to larvae previously treated with a high dose (LD90) of SfMNPV. High doses (LD90) of the GV in combination with low doses (LD10) of the NPV increased by ~3–4 times the larval development time.

Author Contributions

Writing, methodology, review and editing, M.O.-G.; methodology and editing, J.C.B.-R.; review and editing, J.d.J.O.-P.; review and validation, M.Á.S.-M., O.J.C.-C. and C.H.A.-M.; review and methodology, D.I.B.-R.; formal analysis and supervision, C.R.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (Project No. CH1600001442).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

Magali Ordóñez García thanks the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT–México) for the provided PhD scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SfMNPVSpodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus
LD10Lethal dose that kills 10%
LD50Median lethal dose
LD90Lethal dose that kills 90%
SfGVSpodoptera frugiperda granulovirus
NPVNucleopolyhedrovirus
GVGranulovirus
FAWFall armyworm
OBsOcclusion bodies
RHRelative humidity
SDWSterile distilled water
SDSSodium dodecyl sulphate
DpiDays post-infection
AgseNPV-BAgrotis segetum nucleopolyhedrovirus B
AgseGVAgrotis segetum granulovirus
HaGVHelicoverpa armigera granulovirus
HzSNPVHelicoverpa zea nucleopolyhedrovirus
SporNPVSpodoptera ornithogalli nucleopolyhedrovirus
SporGVSpodoptera ornithogalli granulovirus
XcGVXestia c-nigrum granulovirus
PhopGVPhthorimaea operculella granulovirus
AgMNPVAnticarsia gemmatalis nucleopolyhedrovirus
EpapGVEpinotia aporema granulovirus
SpfrMNPVSpodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus
SpfrGVSpodoptera frugiperda granulovirus

References

  1. Goergen, G.; Kumar, P.L.; Sankung, S.B.; Togola, A.; Tamò, M. First report of outbreaks of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in West and Central Africa. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rijal, S. Highlights on Appropriate Management Practices Against Fall Army Worm (Spodoptera Frugiperda) in the Context of Nepal. Environ. Contam. Rev. (ECR) 2019, 2, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ordóñez-García, M.; Rios-Velasco, C.; Ornelas-Paz, J.d.J.; Bustillos-Rodríguez, J.C.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.H.; Berlanga-Reyes, D.I.; Salas-Marina, M.Á.; Cambero-Campos, O.J.; Gallegos-Morales, G. Molecular and Morphological characterization of multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus from Mexico and their insecticidal activity against Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2020, 144, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Harrison, R.D.; Thierfelder, C.; Baudron, F.; Chinwada, P.; Midega, C.; Schaffner, U.; Van Den Berg, J. Agro-ecological options for fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) management: Providing low-cost, smallholder friendly solutions to an invasive pest. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 243, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nboyine, J.; Kusi, F.; Abudulai, M.; Badii, B.; Zakaria, M.; Adu, G.; Haruna, A.; Seidu, A.; Osei, V.; Alhassan, S. A new pest, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith), in tropical Africa: Its seasonal dynamics and damage in maize fields in northern Ghana. Crop Prot. 2020, 127, 104960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sree, K.S.; Varma, A. An Introduction to Entomopathogenic Microorganisms. In Biocontrol of Lepidopteran Pests: Use of Soil Microbes and their Metabolites; Sree, K.S., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zimmermann, G. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2007, 17, 553–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Natra, N.T.; Kumar, M.; Apurava, K.; Thakur, V.V. Biopesticides: An effective and environmental friendly insect-pests inhibitor line of action. In Biofertilizers and Biopesticides in Sustainable Agriculture; Kaushik, B.D., Kumar, D., Shamim, M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 71–90. [Google Scholar]
  9. Inceoglu, A.B.; Kamita, S.G.; Hammock, B.D. Genetically modified baculoviruses: A historical overview and future outlook. Adv. Virus Res. 2006, 68, 323–360. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sood, P.; Choudhary, A.; Prabhakar, C.S. Granuloviruses in insect pest management. In Microbes for Sustainable Insect Pest Management: An Eco-Friendly Approach; Khan, M.A., Ahmad, W., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Barrera, G.; Gómez, J.; Cuartas, P.; León, G.; Villamizar, L. Caracterización morfológica, biológica y genética de un aislamiento colombiano de granulovirus de Erinnyis ello (L.) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 2014, 16, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bernal, A.; Williams, T.; Hernández-Suárez, E.; Carnero, A.; Caballero, P.; Simón, O. A native variant of Chrysodeixis chalcites nucleopolyhedrovirus: The basis for a promising bioinsecticide for control of C. chalcites on Canary Islands’ banana crops. Biol. Control 2013, 67, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harrison, R.L.; Popham, H.J.; Breitenbach, J.E.; Rowley, D.L. Genetic variation and virulence of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus and Trichoplusia ni single nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 110, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jukes, M.D.; Knox, C.M.; Hill, M.P.; Moore, S.D. The isolation and genetic characterisation of a South African strain of Phthorimaea operculella granulovirus, PhopGV-SA. Virus Res. 2014, 183, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zamora-Avilés, N.; Murillo, R.; Lasa, R.; Pineda, S.; Figueroa, J.; Bravo-Patiño, A.; Díaz, O.; Corrales, J.; Martínez, A. Genetic and biological characterization of four nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates collected in Mexico for the control of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barrera, G.; Simón, O.; Villamizar, L.; Williams, T.; Caballero, P. Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus as a potential biological insecticide: Genetic and phenotypic comparison of field isolates from Colombia. Biol. Control 2011, 58, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Behle, R.W.; Popham, H.J. Laboratory and field evaluations of the efficacy of a fast-killing baculovirus isolate from Spodoptera frugiperda. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 109, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martínez, A.M.; Pineda, S.; Figueroa, J.I.; Chavarrieta, J.M.; Williams, T. Los baculovirus como bioinsecticidas: Evaluación de un nucleopoliedrovirus para el combate de Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en México y Honduras. Cienc. Nicolaita 2012, 35–47. [Google Scholar]
  19. Méndez, W.A.; Valle, J.; Ibarra, J.E.; Cisneros, J.; Penagos, D.I.; Williams, T. Spinosad and nucleopolyhedrovirus mixtures for control of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize. Biol. Control 2002, 25, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Núñez, J.C.R.; Ramírez, M.F.V.; Castro, M.C.D.R. Caracterización biológica y molecular de cepas exóticas de Baculovirus SfNPV, con actividad bioinsecticida hacia una población mexicana del gusano cogollero del maíz Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidóptera: Noctuidae). Interciencia 2014, 39, 320–326. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vieira, C.M.; Tuelher, E.S.; Valicente, F.H.; Wolff, J.L.C. Characterization of a Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus isolate that does not liquefy the integument of infected larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 111, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rios-Velasco, C.; Gallegos-Morales, G.; Del Rincón-Castro, M.C.; Cerna-Chávez, E.; Sánchez-Peña, S.R.; Siller, M.C. Insecticidal activity of native isolates of Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus from soil samples in Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 2011, 94, 716–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Simón, O.; Williams, T.; López-Ferber, M.; Taulemesse, J.-M.; Caballero, P. Population genetic structure determines speed of kill and occlusion body production in Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Biol. Control 2008, 44, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ordóñez-García, M.; Bustillos-Rodríguez, J.C.; de Jesús Ornelas-Paz, J.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.H.; Salas-Marina, M.Á.; Cambero-Campos, O.J.; Estrada-Virgen, M.O.; Morales-Ovando, M.A.; Rios-Velasco, C. Morphological, biological, and molecular characterization of Type I granuloviruses of Spodoptera frugiperda. Neotrop. Entomol. 2024, 53, 917–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pidre, M.L.; Sabalette, K.B.; Romanowski, V.; Ferrelli, M.L. Identification of an Argentinean isolate of Spodoptera frugiperda granulovirus. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2019, 51, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Federici, B.A. Baculovirus pathogenesis. In The Baculoviruses; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1997; pp. 33–59. [Google Scholar]
  27. Biedma, M.E.; Salvador, R.; Ferrelli, M.L.; Sciocco-Cap, A.; Romanowski, V. Effect of the interaction between Anticarsia gemmatalis multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus and Epinotia aporema granulovirus, on A. gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Biol. Control 2015, 91, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  28. Espinel-Correal, C.; López-Ferber, M.; Zeddam, J.-L.; Villamizar, L.; Gómez, J.; Cotes, A.M.; Léry, X. Experimental mixtures of Phthorimaea operculella granulovirus isolates provide high biological efficacy on both Phthorimaea operculella and Tecia solanivora (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 110, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hackett, K.J.; Boore, A.; Deming, C.; Buckley, E.; Camp, M.; Shapiro, M. Helicoverpa armigera granulovirus interference with progression of H. zea nucleopolyhedrovirus disease in H. zea larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2000, 75, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cuartas-Otálora, P.E.; Gómez-Valderrama, J.A.; Ramos, A.E.; Barrera-Cubillos, G.P.; Villamizar-Rivero, L.F. Bio-Insecticidal Potential of Nucleopolyhedrovirus and Granulovirus Mixtures to Control the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Viruses 2019, 11, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, X.W.; Lynn, D.E. Baculovirus Interactions: In Vitro and In Vivo. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Laskin, A.I., Sariaslani, S., Gadd, G.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 217–239. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ishimwe, E.; Hodgson, J.J.; Passarelli, A.L. Expression of the Cydia pomonella granulovirus matrix metalloprotease enhances Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus virulence and can partially substitute for viral cathepsin. Virology 2015, 481, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hughes, P.; Wood, H. A synchronous peroral technique for the bioassay of insect viruses. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1981, 37, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Muñoz, D.; Martínez, A.M.; Pérez, R.M.; de Escudero Fuentemilla, I.R.; Vilaplana, L. Técnicas básicas para la caracterización de baculovirus. In Los Baculovirus y sus Aplicaciones Como Bioinsecticidas en el Control Biológico de Plagas; Caballero, P., Williams, T., López-Ferber, M., Eds.; Universidad Pública de Navarra-Phytoma: Valencia, Spain, 2001; pp. 479–518. [Google Scholar]
  35. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1971; p. 333. [Google Scholar]
  36. SAS Institute Incorporated. SAS User’s Guide; SAS Institute Incorporated: Cary, NC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Koppenhöfer, A.M.; Kaya, H.K. Additive and synergistic interaction between entomopathogenic nematodes and bacillus thuringiensis for scarab grub control. Biol. Control 1997, 8, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du Plessis, H.; Schlemmer, M.-L.; Van den Berg, J. The effect of temperature on the development of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 2020, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Choi, J.Y.; Roh, J.Y.; Woo, S.D.; Jin, B.R.; Je, Y.H. Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Spodoptera litura granulovirus. J. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 704–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wennmann, J.T.; Köhler, T.; Gueli Alletti, G.; Jehle, J.A. Mortality of cutworm larvae is not enhanced by Agrotis segetum granulovirus and Agrotis segetum nucleopolyhedrovirus B coinfection relative to single infection by either virus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 2893–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dias-Vasconcelos, S. Ecología de los baculovirus. In Los Baculovirus y sus Aplicaciones Como Bioinsecticidas en el Control Biológico de Plagas; Caballero, P., Williams, T., López-Ferber, M., Eds.; Universidad Pública de Navarra-Phytoma: Valencia, Spain, 2001; pp. 143–201. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sciocco-Cap, A. Biología y patogénesis de los baculovirus. In Los Baculovirus y sus Aplicaciones como Bioinsecticidas en el Control Biológico de Plagas; Caballero, P., Williams, T., López-Ferber, M., Eds.; Universidad Pública de Navarra-Phytoma: Valencia, Spain, 2001; pp. 47–72. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ferrelli, M.L.; Salvador, R. Effects of mixed baculovirus infections in biological control: A comprehensive historical and technical analysis. Viruses 2023, 15, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barrera, G.P.; Villamizar, L.F.; Araque, G.A.; Gómez, J.A.; Guevara, E.J.; Cerrudo, C.S.; Belaich, M.N. Natural coinfection between novel species of baculoviruses in Spodoptera Ornithogalli larvae. Viruses 2021, 13, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guo, H.; Fang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhong, W.; Liu, B. Interaction of Xestia c-nigrum granulovirus with peritrophic matrix and Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus in Spodoptera litura. J. Econ. Entomol. 2007, 100, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lasa, R.; Caballero, P.; Williams, T. Juvenile hormone analogs greatly increase the production of a nucleopolyhedrovirus. Biol. Control 2007, 41, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hatem, A.E.-S.; Aldebis, H.K.; Osuna, E.V. Effects of the Spodoptera littoralis granulovirus on the development and reproduction of cotton leafworm S. littoralis. Biol. Control 2011, 59, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 17 00674 g001
Figure 1. The appearances of FAW larvae infected with the tested isolates alone and in mixtures. (a) A larva infected with the SfGV-CH13 isolate alone at a dose of 4.3 × 105 OBs/larva at 11 days post-infection (dpi) without a change in coloration or a rupture of the integument; (b) A larva infected with the SfNPV-CH32 isolate alone at a dose of 6.6 × 103 OBs/larva at 6 dpi; the dark color of the fat body indicates the rapid development of NPV infection and the liquefaction of the cadaver; (c) A larva infected with the GV and NPV at the same time at doses of LD50:LD90 at 6 dpi; (d) A larva infected with the GV and NPV at the same time at doses of LD90:LD50 at 6 dpi; the different light color of the fat body in (c,d) indicates mainly the symptoms of NPV infection, with the liquefaction of the cadaver. (e) Larvae infected with the GV and NPV at the same time at doses of LD90:LD10 at 6 dpi, the light color of the fat body indicates a change in coloration, but no rupture of the integument. (f) An un-infected fifth-instar larva (control).
Figure 1. The appearances of FAW larvae infected with the tested isolates alone and in mixtures. (a) A larva infected with the SfGV-CH13 isolate alone at a dose of 4.3 × 105 OBs/larva at 11 days post-infection (dpi) without a change in coloration or a rupture of the integument; (b) A larva infected with the SfNPV-CH32 isolate alone at a dose of 6.6 × 103 OBs/larva at 6 dpi; the dark color of the fat body indicates the rapid development of NPV infection and the liquefaction of the cadaver; (c) A larva infected with the GV and NPV at the same time at doses of LD50:LD90 at 6 dpi; (d) A larva infected with the GV and NPV at the same time at doses of LD90:LD50 at 6 dpi; the different light color of the fat body in (c,d) indicates mainly the symptoms of NPV infection, with the liquefaction of the cadaver. (e) Larvae infected with the GV and NPV at the same time at doses of LD90:LD10 at 6 dpi, the light color of the fat body indicates a change in coloration, but no rupture of the integument. (f) An un-infected fifth-instar larva (control).
Viruses 17 00674 g001
Viruses 17 00674 g002
Figure 2. The larval mortality caused by the isolates of SfGV-CH13 (GV) and SfNPV-CH32 (NPV) at different concentrations (LD10, LD50, and LD90), alone (a) and co-infecting (b–d) the larvae after 0, 12, and 24 h of delivery of the first virus. The data were taken at 14 days post-infection. ♦, the viruses were delivered at the same time (0 h), *, the second virus was delivered 12 h after infection with the first isolate. ‡, the second virus was delivered 24 h after infection with the first isolate. Equal literals on the standard error bars indicate no statistical differences between the isolates at the same dose, according to a Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The larval mortality caused by the isolates of SfGV-CH13 (GV) and SfNPV-CH32 (NPV) at different concentrations (LD10, LD50, and LD90), alone (a) and co-infecting (b–d) the larvae after 0, 12, and 24 h of delivery of the first virus. The data were taken at 14 days post-infection. ♦, the viruses were delivered at the same time (0 h), *, the second virus was delivered 12 h after infection with the first isolate. ‡, the second virus was delivered 24 h after infection with the first isolate. Equal literals on the standard error bars indicate no statistical differences between the isolates at the same dose, according to a Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Viruses 17 00674 g002
Viruses 17 00674 g003
Figure 3. Larval mortality caused by isolates of SfGV-CH13 and SfNPV-CH32 alone and in co-infection from 3 to 14 days post-infection. The right side of the figure shows the treatments evaluated and compared in each graph (a–c).
Figure 3. Larval mortality caused by isolates of SfGV-CH13 and SfNPV-CH32 alone and in co-infection from 3 to 14 days post-infection. The right side of the figure shows the treatments evaluated and compared in each graph (a–c).
Viruses 17 00674 g003
Table 1. Lethal doses of tested granulovirus and nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates against third-instar S. frugiperda larvae.
Table 1. Lethal doses of tested granulovirus and nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates against third-instar S. frugiperda larvae.
Isolate Lethal DosesDoses
(OBs/Larva)		Fiducial Limits (95%)χ2dfSlope ± (SE)Intercept ± (SE)
Lower Upper
SfGV-CH13LD505.4 × 1023.1 × 1029.5 × 1024.540.4 ± 0.04 −1.2 ± 0.13
LD904.3 × 1051.3 × 1052.3 × 1064.540.4 ± 0.04 −1.2 ± 0.13
SfNPV-CH32LD104.7 × 1012.6 × 1016.7 × 1014.931.2 ± 0.08 −3.3 ± 0.23
LD505.6 × 1024.3 × 1027.4 × 1024.931.2 ± 0.08−3.3 ± 0.23
LD906.6 × 1034.4 × 1031.1 × 1044.931.2 ± 0.08−3.3 ± 0.23
Table 2. Treatments of third-instar S. frugiperda larvae with SfGV-CH13 and SfNPV-CH32 isolates at 14 days post-infection.
Table 2. Treatments of third-instar S. frugiperda larvae with SfGV-CH13 and SfNPV-CH32 isolates at 14 days post-infection.
Dose OBs/LarvaInoculation of Viral IsolatesInteraction Type
TreatmentSfGV-CH13SfNPV-CH32
T15.4 × 102 (LD50)--Alone--
T24.3 × 105 (LD90)--Alone--
T3--4.7 × 101 (LD10)Alone--
T4--5.6 × 102 (LD50)Alone--
T5--6.6 × 103 (LD90)Alone--
T6♦ LD50♦ LD90Same timeAntagonism
T7LD50* LD90GV at 0 h + NPV at 12 hAntagonism
T8LD50‡ LD90GV at 0 h + NPV at 24 hAntagonism
T9* LD50LD90NPV at 0 h + GV at 12 hAntagonism
T10‡ LD50LD90NPV at 0 h + GV at 24 hSynergism
T11♦ LD90♦ LD50Same timeAntagonism
T12LD90* LD50GV at 0 h + NPV at 12 hAntagonism
T13LD90‡ LD50GV at 0 h + NPV at 24 hAntagonism
T14* LD90LD50NPV at 0 h + GV at 12 hAntagonism
T15‡ LD90LD50NPV at 0 h + GV at 24 hAntagonism
T16♦ LD90♦ LD10Same timeAntagonism
T17LD90* LD10GV at 0 h + NPV at 12 hAntagonism
T18LD90‡ LD10GV at 0 h + NPV at 24 hAntagonism
T19* LD90LD10NPV at 0 h + GV at 12 hAntagonism
T20‡ LD90LD10NPV at 0 h + GV at 24 hAntagonism
T21Un-infected larvaeControl
♦, supplied at the same time. *, supplied 12 h after the infection with the first isolate. ‡, supplied 24 h after the infection with the first isolate. -- There was no interaction because only one isolate was evaluated.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ordóñez-García, M.; Bustillos-Rodríguez, J.C.; Ornelas-Paz, J.d.J.; Salas-Marina, M.Á.; Cambero-Campos, O.J.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.H.; Berlanga-Reyes, D.I.; Rios-Velasco, C. The Individual and Combined Entomopathogenic Activity of a Spodoptera frugiperda Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda Granulovirus on S. frugiperda Larvae. Viruses 2025, 17, 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050674

AMA Style

Ordóñez-García M, Bustillos-Rodríguez JC, Ornelas-Paz JdJ, Salas-Marina MÁ, Cambero-Campos OJ, Acosta-Muñiz CH, Berlanga-Reyes DI, Rios-Velasco C. The Individual and Combined Entomopathogenic Activity of a Spodoptera frugiperda Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda Granulovirus on S. frugiperda Larvae. Viruses. 2025; 17(5):674. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ordóñez-García, Magali, Juan Carlos Bustillos-Rodríguez, José de Jesús Ornelas-Paz, Miguel Ángel Salas-Marina, Octavio Jhonathan Cambero-Campos, Carlos Horacio Acosta-Muñiz, David Ignacio Berlanga-Reyes, and Claudio Rios-Velasco. 2025. "The Individual and Combined Entomopathogenic Activity of a Spodoptera frugiperda Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda Granulovirus on S. frugiperda Larvae" Viruses 17, no. 5: 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050674

APA Style

Ordóñez-García, M., Bustillos-Rodríguez, J. C., Ornelas-Paz, J. d. J., Salas-Marina, M. Á., Cambero-Campos, O. J., Acosta-Muñiz, C. H., Berlanga-Reyes, D. I., & Rios-Velasco, C. (2025). The Individual and Combined Entomopathogenic Activity of a Spodoptera frugiperda Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Type I Spodoptera frugiperda Granulovirus on S. frugiperda Larvae. Viruses, 17(5), 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop