Next Article in Journal
Plasma Interleukin-35 Levels Predict the Prognosis in Patients with HBV-Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure
Next Article in Special Issue
Congenital Oropouche in Humans: Clinical Characterization of a Possible New Teratogenic Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Optimized Directed Virus Evolution to Accelerate the Generation of Oncolytic Coxsackievirus B3 Adapted to Resistant Colorectal Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Memory Antibody Responses in Individuals with Zika-Associated Guillain–Barré Syndrome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Postural Abnormalities in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome-Related Neurological and Visual Impairment

1
Paulista School Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (Unifesp), Sao Paulo 04023-062, Brazil
2
Rehabilitation Center, Altino Ventura Foundation (FAV), Recife 50070-040, Brazil
3
Department of Research, Altino Ventura Foundation (FAV), Recife 50070-040, Brazil
4
Department of Ophthalmology, Altino Ventura Foundation (FAV), Recife 50070-040, Brazil
5
Department of Ophthalmology, HOPE Eye Hospital, Recife 50070-040, Brazil
6
Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo (Unifesp), Sao Paulo 04023-062, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2024, 16(12), 1959; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121959
Submission received: 19 October 2024 / Revised: 18 December 2024 / Accepted: 19 December 2024 / Published: 20 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mosquito-Borne Encephalitis Viruses)

Abstract

:
Deformities, body asymmetries, and muscle contractures are common consequences of atypical postural patterns in children with c ongenital Zika syndrome (CZS). This study aimed to evaluate the posture of children with CZS, considering their neurological and visual impairments. Ophthalmological assessment included binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Teller Acuity Cards II (TAC II) and an ocular motility evaluation. Postural alignment was measured using the PhysioCode Posture (PCP) app. Twenty-four children with CZS (12 [50.0%] female) were included, with a mean age of 6.8 ± 0.7 years (range, 4.0–7.0 years). The majority (79.2% [19/24]) had microcephaly at birth. Visual impairment was detected in 95.2% (20/21) of the children, with 85.0% (17/20) classified as moderate, severe, or blind. Shoulder asymmetry was observed in 95.8% (23/24) of participants, and 75.0% (18/24) presented abnormal postural alignment of the head and hips. Additionally, spinal deviations were found in 41.7% (10/24) of the children. All children with CZS exhibited asymmetries and improper postural patterns, which may result from a combination of neurological and visual impairments as well as environmental factors.

1. Introduction

The Zika virus (ZIKV) became known worldwide in 2015–2016 when it caused an outbreak in the Americas that started in the northeast of Brazil [1,2]. The ZIKV transmission can occur from mother to fetus during pregnancy, as well as through sexual contact, blood transfusion and blood products, and possibly through organ transplantation [3,4]. Children exposed to ZIKV in utero may present microcephaly, cerebral abnormalities, and ocular findings, among other birth defects, as well as functional disabilities secondary to c entral nervous system (CNS) damage, also known as congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) [5]. These congenital malformations observed in children with CZS are challenging for health professionals and caregivers as they have severe implications on the neurodevelopment as well as the quality of life of the affected children and their caregivers [5,6].
Children born with CZS display atypical motor development. They present changes in muscle tone, motor control, and posture [7]. These changes result from dysfunction of the CNS, which disrupts the development of a robust musculoskeletal system necessary for the child to achieve an upright posture and support their own body weight against gravity [8,9]. Arthrogryposis, hyperreflexia, balance deficits, and asymmetries in the hip, knee, ankle, wrist, and shoulder joints may also be present in this population and negatively contribute to motor development and lead to increasingly frequent immobility [10,11].
Studies have shown that children with CZS have significant motor impairments, which reduce their opportunities to develop social and environmental exploration skills [10,11,12]. Furthermore, the severity of the physical disability causes significant biomechanical misalignments in the posture [12]. The appearance of deformities, joint stiffness, asymmetries, muscle contractions and shortening, and chronic pain are consequences of these atypical postural patterns [10,11,12].
Overlapping with these neurological manifestations, children with CZS present visual impairment [13]. Studies show that regardless of the structural damage caused by the ZIKV to the retina and optic nerve, most children with CZS present moderate to severe visual impairment, also known as cerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI) [14,15]. When present, visual impairment can affect the child’s ability to integrate visual information with the proprioceptive and vestibular systems that are essential for balance, spatial orientation, and environmental perception [16]. The implications of an affected visual system extend beyond vision alone, potentially encompassing a child’s ability to aim accurately and develop and maintain proper body alignment and balance skills, with significant repercussions on their posture [17].
Body posture is strongly influenced by muscular and sensory factors including the performance of the visual system [18]. This complex neuromuscular function plays a fundamental role in balance, motor activities, and social participation. It is reasonable to assume that children with CZS are at greater risk of developing specific postural alterations, related to their disabilities and disorders [19]. These can manifest as postural misalignments such as scoliosis, hyperlordosis, hyperkyphosis, asymmetries in weight distribution, and postural instability.
Understanding the postural abnormalities in children with neurosensorial conditions is crucial to improve clinical interventions, provide adequate support to children and their families, and ensure a better quality of life for all. Thus, the present study aimed to assess the posture of children with CZS by evaluating posture-related abnormalities in children with CZS, considering their neurological and visual impairments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design

This is an observational, quantitative, cross-sectional, exploratory study, employing a convenient sample of children with CZS.

2.2. Participants

Children were consecutively recruited from the multidisciplinary rehabilitation program of the Altino Ventura Foundation’s (FAV’s) Rehabilitation Center, in Recife, Brazil. The inclusion criteria included children with (1) positive test for ZIKV obtained either by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) or Immunoglobulin M antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) performed on cerebrospinal fluid, and/or (2) clinical manifestations of CZS including microcephaly, subcortical calcifications, and ocular manifestations, and a positive report of arbovirus symptoms during pregnancy by mother. Children with positive serology for other congenital infections, such as toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), syphilis, herpes, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were excluded from the study.

2.3. Sociodemographic and Clinical Questionnaire

A standardized questionnaire was administered to parents/caregivers with the assistance of a trained technician due to limited literacy among participants in the sample. The data collected included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the children.

2.4. Measures

2.4.1. Posture Assessment

Posture alignment assessment was performed by using digital photographs captured and analyzed using the camera of an iPad (5 generations, version 14.4, model MPGT2LL/A) and the PhysioCode® Posture(PCP) app [20], available for IOS and Android, with the position standardized at 100 × 20 cm from the floor and at 100 cm from the child. The children were placed on a 0.5 cm-thick mat on the floor, without accessories (e.g., watch, bracelets, hair clip, and glasses) and unclothed. Due to severe musculoskeletal impairment and/or neurological reflexes, some children were unable to remain in the prone and/or dorsal decubitus position in an aligned anatomic manner, and the position in which the child was allowed to remain without pain was respected (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Data from the recorded images of each child assessed were analyzed using the PCP app algorithm, using measurements of and angular observations of the following variables: tilt of the head (earlobes), shoulder position (acromion), elbows (epicondyle), wrists (radius bone), hip (iliac crests), knees (patella and popliteal line), ankle (malleolus), and lateral deviation of the spine (C7 and T12 vertebrae) (Figure 1a,b and Figure 2a,b). The guidelines involved calibrating the image, marking the level of the joints and their specific characteristics mentioned above, generating the analysis report, and exporting it to Excel. The analysis report was generated automatically by the application, using the images collected, the demarcated points, and the registered reference (anatomical) values. In this way, the report provides information about the angulations found, whether they are within normal values, or the amount of deviation found (degrees).

2.4.2. Visual Assessment

Children underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination performed by pediatric ophthalmologists using the same protocol described previously by Ventura et al. [12]. Binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using Teller Acuity Cards II (TAC; Stereo Optical Co Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and was recorded in cycles per cm (cy/cm). Visual acuity (VA) data were compared with age-related reference acuity norms and was categorized as very low vision (<1.6 cy/deg), low vision (1.6–9.6 cy/deg), near-normal vision (9.6–26.0 cy/deg), and normal vision (>26.0 cy/deg) [21]. Ocular motility examination included detecting strabismus and nystagmus. The angle of the strabismus was measured with the Krimsky test at near fixation (i.e., 33 cm), as children had significant visual impairment. Significant refractive errors included hyperopia of 2.00 diopters (D) or greater, or myopia or astigmatism of 1.00 D or greater [22].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The characteristics studied were described by means of absolute and relative frequencies for qualitative variables, and by means of the mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables.
To assess the relationships between two qualitative variables, cross-contingency tables were constructed that present absolute values and percentages. In addition, Fisher’s exact test was used to verify the significance of the relationships. To assess the relationships between a qualitative and a quantitative variable, position measures, such as mean and median, and dispersion measures, such as standard deviation and minimum and maximum values for the quantitative variable, were calculated, considering each group of the qualitative variable. In addition, the Mann–Whitney test was used to verify the significance of the relationships.
In all cases, a significance level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data processing and analysis were performed using Jamovi 2.3 software.

3. Results

Twenty-four children with CZS (12 [50.0%] female) were included in this study, with a mean age of 6.8 ± 0.7 years (range, 4.0–7.0 years). Microcephaly at birth was identified in 79.2% (19/24) of children, from which 73.7% (14/24) was classified as severe. All children (100.0%) had hypertonia, were using anticonvulsant medication, and 25.0% (6/24) presented developed hydrocephalus (Table 1). Most children (18 [75%]) were diagnosed with CZS due to positive serology for Zika virus. The remaining children (6 [25%]) had neuroimaging findings compatible with the syndrome, such as the presence of reduced brain volume, ventricular alterations, and calcifications (Table 2).
All children had postural dysfunctions. Twenty children (83.3%) presented with postural alterations in six or more corporal segments (tilt of the head, hip, shoulder position, lateral deviation of the spine, knee, and ankle).
Almost all children (23 [95.8%]) presented with shoulder position asymmetry: 10 (41.7%) had elevation of the right shoulder and 13 (54.2%) had elevation of the left shoulder. Most children (18 [75.0%]) presented alterations in the tilt of the head—seven children (29.2%) had right lateral flexion and eleven children (45.8%) had left lateral flexion. Alterations of the hip positioning was observed in most children (18 [75.0%]): eight children (33.4%) had elevation of the right hip and ten children (41.7%) had elevation of the left hip. Almost half of the children (10 [41.7%]) had lateral deviations of the spine—five (20.8%) with right convexity and five (20.8%) with left convexity, indicating the presence of thoracolumbar scoliosis on both sides. Nineteen children (79.2%) had knee deviation and 22 (91.7%) had ankle deviation (Table 3).
The mean knee deviation identified among the studied children was 48.7° (normal knee deviation: 0–8.9°), the mean head positioning deviation was 21.2° (normal head positioning deviation: 0–3.1°), the mean ankle deviation was 15.4° (normal ankle deviation: 0–7.4°), the mean hip asymmetry deviation was 14.5° (normal hip asymmetry deviation: 0–1.6°), the mean spine deviation was 7.5° (normal spine deviation: 0–5.0°), and the mean shoulder asymmetry deviation was 15.0° (normal shoulder asymmetry deviation: 0–1.6°).
Ophthalmological examination was performed in 21/24 children (87.5%). Visual impairment was present in 20/21 children (95.3%). Moderate visual impairment was detected in six [28.6%] children, severe visual impairment in six [28.6%] children, blindness in five [23.8%] children, and mild visual blindness in three (14.3%) children. Structural findings in the retina and/or optic disk were present in 8/21 (38.1%) children. Strabismus and nystagmus were seen in 15/21 (71.4%) and 4/21 (19.0%) of children, respectively. Significant refractive errors were present in all children (21 [100.0%]). Astigmatism was present in all children (21 [100.0%]) and hyperopia in 13 [61.9%] children. (Table 4). No correlation was found between the severity of visual impairment and postural deviations nor with greater angular deviations of body segments. (both p-values > 0.05) (Table 5 and Table 6).
Children with microcephaly did not present with more postural deviations nor with greater angular deviations of body segments compared to children without microcephaly (both p-values > 0.05). There was also no correlation between the severity of microcephaly and the presence of posture abnormalities (p-value > 0.05) (Table 5).
Children with microcephaly did not present with more postural deviations nor with greater angular deviations of body segments compared to children without microcephaly (both p-values >0.05). There was n ot a correlation between the severity of microcephaly and the presence of posture abnormalities (p-value >0.05) (Table 7).
The analysis of postural deviations in relation to the severity of microcephaly and visual impairment showed variations in frequency across the evaluated body segments. In cases of mild microcephaly, deviations were more frequent at mild and moderate levels of visual impairment, while, in more severe cases, higher prevalence was observed at severe and blindness levels. The head, shoulders, hips, knees, and ankles showed frequencies of postural changes ranging from 50.0% to 100.0%, with no statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Deviations in the spinal column occurred more frequently at moderate to severe levels of visual impairment in children with mild microcephaly (50.0 % to 100.0%) and at moderate and blindness levels in children with severe microcephaly (33.0% to 100.0%). Although the frequencies of postural changes varied according to body segment and the severity of microcephaly, no statistically significant correlation was observed with the severity of visual impairment (Table 8).

4. Discussion

Postural assessment in children with disabilities is complex and challenging. It requires a deep understanding of the multiple interactions between the musculoskeletal, sensory, and visual systems [23]. Although significant advances have been made in understanding postural alterations in children with disabilities, gaps in knowledge can be identified, especially when it comes to children with severe motor impairments that cannot sustain sitting or standing positions independently. The lack of specific assessment tools for children with neurological conditions and severe motor disabilities including CZS limits the ability to properly identify and quantify postural changes in this population.
The present study assessed the postural dysfunctions in children with CZS using the PhysioCode® Posture app [20], a specific app that has been developed to measure postural deviations based on photographic evaluations; this app identified that all of the children presented with postural deviations in their body segments and more than 80.0% presented with alterations in more than six body segments.
The unalignment of the musculoskeletal system in children with CZS may have significant clinical and functional repercussions. In addition to functional implications such as mobility difficulties and challenges in performing daily activities, postural alterations can cause chronic pain and discomfort, resulting in negative psychosocial impacts [24,25]. Moreover, studies comparing postural alignment patterns in children with typical development with those with disabilities such as cerebral palsy revealed substantial differences that have significant impacts on their quality of life [24,25].
Pone et al. showed that these neurological complications in CZS create significant challenges for maintaining proper postures due to repercussions on the neuromuscular system [26]. Therefore, the postural findings in children with CZS observed here in could be a result of the structural damage caused by ZIKV to the brain that leads to hypertonia and consequently deviations of the body segments. In addition, vision plays a fundamental role in body development as it is a primary source of stimulus that enables direct interaction with the external environment [16]. The visual impairment identified in almost all children herein may have negatively contributed to the loss of spatial orientation, environmental perception, and children’s balance, favoring the persistence of atypical movement patterns and abnormalities of postures [27,28].
It was possible to identify that three out of every four children in our sample presented with hip positioning alterations. This finding corroborates with previous studies that demonstrated a high prevalence of hip alterations in children with CZS [28]. Additionally, almost half of the children (41.7%) had deviations in the spine, suggesting the presence of scoliosis. These alterations may indicate that more severe orthopedic impairments may develop over time, causing pain, deformity, and limitation of movement, affecting the child’s well-being [26,29].
Other significant body alterations were identified, such as foot deformities and knee joint alterations, previously reported by Matos et al. (2021) [30]. Most children presented deviations in knee and ankle joints. These findings highlight the extent of musculoskeletal complications, such as increased muscle tone, little experimentation with higher postures (standing posture and walking), and the prolonged maintenance of inadequate postures, contributing to the emergence of possibly surgical postural alterations.
Although no correlation was identified between severity of microcephaly and visual impairment with the postural alterations, it is known that posture alignment depends on the regulation and work of several systems at the same time. In children with multiple disabilities, broad manifestations, including neurological, visual, sensory, musculoskeletal, and proprioceptive manifestations, contribute negatively to postural alignment.
It is important to highlight the short- and long-term impacts that postural alterations bring to children. The psychosocial impacts, for example in play, school learning, nutrition, communication, feeding, sleep, and participation in physical activities, must be considered for individual well-being. Therefore, understanding the implications of postural alterations is fundamental to guide early and effective interventions that can prevent or correct these complications, to minimize the risk of musculoskeletal deformities causing pain and limiting social participation, to reduce the need for surgical procedures throughout life, and to improve the quality of life of children with CZS [31]. In this context, to minimize and even correct postural deformities early, the children included in this study were subject to specific and ongoing interventions, such as foot– ankle orthoses to prevent foot deformities, and physical therapy rehabilitation up to four times a month. The patients were also on the waiting list for corrective surgeries for orthopedic conditions which included correcting scoliosis, hip dysplasia, and dislocations.
The limitations of this study include the small sample size and the challenging assessment due to the difficulty in maintaining the children in standardized anatomical postures and without much external interference. The absence of a healthy control group is a limitation of our study too; however, we mitigated this limitation by thoroughly verifying Zika virus (ZIKV) diagnosis through laboratory testing and comprehensive clinical-epidemiological profiling. We also ruled out other conditions associated with similar symptoms by examining each child’s medical history and performing additional serological testing to exclude relevant differential diagnoses. It is noteworthy that the postural changes described herein may be postural compensations, due to the body rotations that these children present with and that are related to severe motor impairment. However, it is still important to be aware of this clinical picture so that the approach of health professionals can be more specific, and interventions can be made earlier and more assertive. Another limitation of the study was that most children presented with microcephaly and visual impairment in our sample. Therefore, statistical analyses to evaluate a relationship between the postural alterations and these variables were compromised. However, microcephaly, severe microcephaly, and visual impairment were observed in most cases, which imposes a limitation in the statistical analysis given the asymmetry between groups.

5. Conclusions

Children with CZS have significant body asymmetries and postural alterations that may lead to more complex long-term physical deformities and functional deficits. In addition, the postural misalignment herein observed may have a negative impact on the quality of life of children with CZS.
The implementation of specific assessments and early interventions to address the postural dysfunction in CZS are key points to improve the quality of life and well-being of this affected population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B., L.O.V. and C.V.V.; methodology, R.B., A.R., C.M. and L.N.; formal analysis, D.S.; investigation, R.B. and A.R.; resources, R.B.; data curation, L.O.V., C.V.V. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B.; writing—review and editing, T.H., L.O.V., C.V.V. and J.S.; supervision, L.O.V. and J.S.; project administration, L.O.V., J.S. and C.V.V.; funding acquisition, C.V.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported financially by grant 1R01HD093572-0 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Altino Ventura Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Altino Ventura Foundation (FAV), and the Federal University of Sao Paulo (protocol number: 4.241.155 approved on 27 August 2020, and 4.286.547, approved on 18 September 2020, respectively).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the parents to publish this paper, as well as the full photos of their children.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the children and their families/caregivers participating in the study. We also thank the contributions of the multidiscipline team of the Rehabilitation Center and the Department of Research of the Altino Ventura Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pan American Health Organization; World Health Organization. Epidemiological Alert: Neurological Syndrome, Congenital Malformations, and Zika Virus Infection: Implications for Public Health in the Americas. PAHO/WHO 2015. Available online: https://www.paho.org (accessed on 5 November 2023).
  2. Zanluca, C.; Melo, V.C.; Mosimann, A.L.; Santos, G.I.; Santos, C.N.; Luz, K. First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2015, 110, 569–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Calvet, G.; Aguiar, R.S.; Melo, A.S.; Sampaio, S.A.; de Filippis, I.; Fabri, A.; Araujo, E.S.; de Sequeira, P.C.; de Mendonça, M.C.; de Oliveira, L.; et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: A case study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Motta, I.J.; Spencer, B.R.; Cordeiro da Silva, S.G.; Arruda, M.B.; Dobbin, J.A.; Gonzaga, Y.B.; Arcuri, I.P.; Tavares, R.C.; Atta, E.H.; Fernandes, R.F.; et al. Evidence for transmission of Zika virus by platelet transfusion. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1101–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moore, C.A.; Staples, J.E.; Dobyns, W.B.; Pessoa, A.; Ventura, C.V.; Da Fonseca, E.B.; Ribeiro, E.M.; Ventura, L.O.; Neto, N.N.; Arena, J.F.; et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in Congenital Zika Syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schuler-Faccini, L.; Del Campo, M.; García-Alix, A.; Ventura, L.O.; Boquett, J.A.; van der Linden, V.; Pessoa, A.; van der Linden Júnior, H.; Ventura, C.V.; Leal, M.C.; et al. Neurodevelopment in Children Exposed to Zika in utero: Clinical and Molecular Aspects. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 758715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Melo, A.; Gama, G.L.; Da Silva Júnior, R.A.; De Assunção, P.L.; Tavares, J.S.; Da Silva, M.B.; Costa, K.N.; Vânia, M.L.; Evangelista, M.A.; De Amorim, M.M. Motor function in children with congenital Zika syndrome. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2020, 2, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ventura, P.A.; Lage, M.L.C.; de Carvalho, A.L.; Fernandes, A.S.; Taguchi, T.B.; Nascimento-Carvalho, C.M. Early Gross Motor Development Among Brazilian Children with Microcephaly Born Right After Zika Virus Infection Outbreak. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2020, 41, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Teixeira, G.A.; Dantas, D.N.A.; de Lima Carvalho, G.A.F.; da Silva, A.N.; de Carvalho Lira, A.L.B.; Enders, B.C. Analysis of the concept of the Zika Virus congenital syndrome. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2020, 25, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van der Linden, V.; Rolim Filho, E.L.; Lins, O.G.; van der Linden, A.; de Fátima Viana Vasco Aragão, M.; Brainer-Lima, A.M.; Di Cavalcanti Sousa Cruz, D.; Rocha, M.A.W.; da Silva, P.F.S.; Durce Costa Gomes Carvalho, M.; et al. Congenital Zika syndrome with arthrogryposis: Retrospective case series study. BMJ 2016, 354, i3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harsanyi, S.; Zamborsky, R.; Krajciova, L.; Kokavec, M.; Danisovic, L. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: A review of etiopathogenesis, risk factors, and genetic aspects. Medicina 2020, 56, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van der Linden, H.; Silveira-Moriyama, L.; van der Linden, V.; Pessoa, A.; Valente, K.; Mink, J.; Paciorkowski, A. Movement disorders in children with congenital Zika virus syndrome. Brain Dev. 2020, 42, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ventura, L.O.; Ventura, C.V.; Lawrence, L.; van der Linden, V.; van der Linden, A.; Gois, A.L.; Cavalcanti, M.M.; Barros, E.A.; Dias, N.C.; Berrocal, A.M.; et al. Visual impairment in children with congenital Zika syndrome. J. Am. Assoc. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2017, 21, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Almeida, L.F.; Kattah, M.; Ventura, L.O.; Gois, A.L.; Rocha, C.; Andrade, C.G.; Mendonza-Santiesteban, C.; Ventura, C.V. Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potential in Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2021, 58, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ventura, C.V.; Zin, A.; de Paula Freitas, B.; Ventura, L.O.; Rocha, C.; Costa, F.; Nery, N., Jr.; De Senna, T.C.; Moreira, M.E.L.; Maia, M.; et al. Ophthalmological Manifestations in Congenital Zika Syndrome in 469 Brazilian Children. J. Am. Assoc. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2021, 25, 158.e1–158.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Pádua, M.; Sauer, J.F.; João, S.M.A. Quantitative Postural Analysis of Children With Congenital Visual Impairment. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 2018, 41, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Henderson, A.D.; Ventura, C.V.; Huisman, T.A.G.M.; Meoded, A.; Hazin, A.N.; van der Linden, V. Characterization of Visual Pathway Abnormalities in Infants With Congenital Zika Syndrome Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Neuroophthalmol. 2021, 41, e598–e605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kendall, F.P.; McCreary, E.K.; Provance, P.G.; Rodgers, M.M.; Romani, W.A. Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain, 5th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005; 451p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lanners, J.; Piccioni, A.; Fea, F.; Goergen, E. Early intervention for children with cerebral visual impairment: Preliminary results. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 1999, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moreira, R.; Teles, A.; Fialho, R.; Baluz, R.; Santos, T.C.; Goulart-Filho, R.; Rocha, L.; Silva, F.J.; Gupta, N.; Bastos, V.H.; et al. Mobile Applications for Assessing Human Posture: A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics 2020, 9, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fazzi, E.; Signorini, S.G.; Bova, S.M.; La Piana, R.; Ondei, P.; Bertone, C.; Misefari, W.; Bianchi, P.E. Spectrum of visual disorders in children with cerebral visual impairment. J. Child Neurol. 2007, 22, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ventura, L.O.; Lawrence, L.; Ventura, C.V.; Dutton, G.N.; Marinho, P.; Ferro, P.F.; Gois, A.L.; Dias, N.C.; Ventura, L.; Moore, C.A.; et al. Response to Correction of Refractive Errors and Hypoaccommodation in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome. J. Am. Assoc. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2017, 21, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lidbeck, C.; Bartonek, Å.; Yadav, P.; Tedroff, K.; Åstrand, P.; Hellgren, K.; Gutierrez-Farewik, E.M. The role of visual stimuli on standing posture in children with bilateral cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carlberg, E.B.; Hadders-Algra, M. Postural dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: Some implications for therapeutic guidance. Neural. Plast. 2005, 12, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cunha, A.B.; Polido, G.J.; Bella, G.P.; Garbellini, D.; Fornasari, C.A. Relação entre alinhamento postural e desempenho motor em crianças com paralisia cerebral. Fisioter. Pesqui. 2009, 16, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pone, M.V.D.S.; Gomes da Silva, T.O.; Ribeiro, C.T.M.; Aguiar, E.B.D.; Mendes, P.H.B.; Gomes Junior, S.C.D.S.; Hamanaka, T.; Zin, A.A.; Pereira Junior, J.P.; Moreira, M.E.L.; et al. Acquired Hip Dysplasia in Children with Congenital Zika Virus Infection in the First Four Years of Life. Viruses 2022, 14, 2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Almeida, K.J.; Martins, A.C.B.; Almendra, I.C.C.G.E.; Meneses, G.M.S.D.; Sampaio, T.D.D.O.; Campêlo, J.D.C.M.; Bor-Seng-Shu, E. Clinical aspects of congenital microcephaly syndrome by Zika virus in a rehabilitation center for patients with microcephaly. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2019, 65, 1249–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matos, M.A.; Nascimento, M.A.S.T.; Merriman, J.W. Orthopaedic approach to the congenital Zika syndrome. Int. Orthop. 2021, 45, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alghadir, A.H.; Alotaibi, A.Z.; Iqbal, Z.A. Postural stability in people with visual impairment. Brain Behav. 2019, 9, e01436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alotaibi, A.Z.; Alghadir, A.; Iqbal, Z.A.; Anwer, S. Effect of absence of vision on posture. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 1374–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bertolini, S.M.M.G.; Polyana, M.; Paula, K.P. Postura corporal: Aspectos estruturais funcionais para promoção da saúde. Saúde E Pesqui. 2015, 8, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a)—Anterior views of the first child with congenital Zika syndrome within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the head (earlobes), shoulder (acromion), elbows (epicondyle), wrists (radius bone), hip (iliac crests), knees (patella), ankle (malleolus). (b)—Posterior views of the first child within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the spine (C7 and T12 vertebrae) and knees (popliteal line) and ankles.
Figure 1. (a)—Anterior views of the first child with congenital Zika syndrome within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the head (earlobes), shoulder (acromion), elbows (epicondyle), wrists (radius bone), hip (iliac crests), knees (patella), ankle (malleolus). (b)—Posterior views of the first child within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the spine (C7 and T12 vertebrae) and knees (popliteal line) and ankles.
Viruses 16 01959 g001
Figure 2. (a)—Anterior views of the second child with congenital Zika syndrome within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the head (earlobes), shoulder (acromion), elbows (epicondyle), wrists (radius bone), hip (iliac crests), knees (patella), ankle (malleolus). (b)—Posterior views of the first child within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the spine (C7 and T12 vertebrae) and knees (popliteal line) and ankles.
Figure 2. (a)—Anterior views of the second child with congenital Zika syndrome within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the head (earlobes), shoulder (acromion), elbows (epicondyle), wrists (radius bone), hip (iliac crests), knees (patella), ankle (malleolus). (b)—Posterior views of the first child within a lying position. Marking of points for the evaluation of the spine (C7 and T12 vertebrae) and knees (popliteal line) and ankles.
Viruses 16 01959 g002
Table 1. Demographic and clinical data of children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 24 children).
Table 1. Demographic and clinical data of children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 24 children).
Variablesn (%)
Age in months (mean ± SD)6.8 ± 0.7
Sex
Male12 (50.0)
Female12 (50.0)
Microcephaly
Yes19 (79.2)
No5 (20.8)
Severity of microcephaly
≥3 SD and ≤2 SD5 (26.3)
≤3 SD14 (73.7)
Hypertonia
Yes24 (100)
No0 (0)
Anticonvulsant medication
Yes24 (100)
No0 (0)
Hydrocephalus
Yes6 (25.0)
SD, standard deviation.
Table 2. Diagnostic characterization of CZS: serology and neuroimaging findings (n = 24 children).
Table 2. Diagnostic characterization of CZS: serology and neuroimaging findings (n = 24 children).
PatientZika SerologyBrain ImagingReduced Brain VolumeLateral Ventricular EnlargementFourth Ventricular EnlargementThird Ventricular EnlargementFissure EnlargementSulci ReductionLissencephalyAgyriaPachygyriaCalcifications
1YesCTNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYes
2YesCTYesYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYes
3YesMRIYesYesNoYesNoYesYesYesNoYes
4YesCTYesYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYes
5YesCTYesYesNoYesYesNoYesNoYesYes
6NoCTNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoYes
7YesCTYesYesYesYesYesNoYesNoYesYes
8YesCTYesYesNoYesYesNoYesNoYesYes
9YesCTYesYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoYes
10YesCTYesYesNoYesNoYesYesNoNoYes
11YesMRIYesYesYesYesNoYesYesNoYesYes
12YesCTYesYesNoNoNoYesYesYesYesYes
13YesCTYesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoNoYes
14YesCTYesYesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoYes
15YesCTYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYesYes
16YesCTYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYes
17NoCTYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNoYes
18YesCTYesYesNoYesNoYesYesNoYesYes
19YesMRIYesYesNoNoNoYesYesNoNoNo
20NoCTNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYes
21NoCTNoYesNoNoYesNoNoNoNoYes
22NoCTNoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoYes
23YesMRIYesYesYesYesNoYesYesNoYesYes
24NoMRIYesYesYesYesNoYesYesNoYesYes
CT = c omputed t omography; MRI = m agnetic resonance imaging.
Table 3. Posture abnormalities data of children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 24 children).
Table 3. Posture abnormalities data of children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 24 children).
Posture Abnormalitiesn (%)
Head
Left tilt11 (45.8)
Right tilt7 (29.2)
None6 (25)
Shoulder
Left elevation13 (54.2)
Right elevation10 (41.7)
None1 (4.2)
Spine
Left deviation5 (20.8)
Right deviation5 (20.8)
None14 (58.3)
Hip
Left elevation10 (41.7)
Right elevation8 (33.4)
None6 (25)
Knee
Varus22 (84.6)
Valgus10 (38.4)
None2 (7.7)
Ankle
Eversion19 (73.1)
Inversion14 (53.9)
None0
Table 4. Ophthalmological findings data of children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 21 children).
Table 4. Ophthalmological findings data of children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 21 children).
Ophthalmological Evaluationn (%)
Visual impairment
Normal1 (4.8)
Mild3 (14.3)
Moderate6 (28.6)
Severe6 (28.6)
Blindness5 (23.8)
Structural findings8 (38.1)
              Retina
Yes7 (33.3)
No1 (4.8)
              Optic nerve
Yes6 (28.6)
No2 (9.5)
Strabismus
Yes15 (71.4)
No6 (28.6)
Nystagmus
Yes4 (19.0)
No17 (81.0)
Refractive errors
Myopia8 (38.1)
Hyperopia13 (61.9)
Astigmatism21 (100)
Table 5. Postural deviation of body segments according to the visual impairment classification in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 21 children).
Table 5. Postural deviation of body segments according to the visual impairment classification in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 21 children).
Body SegmentsVisual Impairment Classification
MildModerateSevereBlindnessp-Value *
Head3/3 (100.0%)5/6 (83.3%)4/6 (66.7%)3/5 (60.0%)0.759
Shoulder3/3 (100.0%)5/6 (83.3%)5/6 (83.3%)5/5 (100.0%)1
Hip3/3 (100.0%)5/6 (83.3%)4/6 (66.7%)3/5 (60.0%)0.759
Right knee3/3 (100.0%)5/6 (83.3%)4/6 (66.7%)4/5 (80.0%)0.910
Left knee3/3 (100.0%)6/6 (100.0%)5/6 (83.3%)4/5 (80.0%)0.829
Spine1/3 (33.3%)4/6 (66.7%)2/6 (33.3%)2/5 (40.0%)0.694
Left ankle1/3 (33.3%)6/6 (100.0%)4/6 (66.7%)4/5 (80.0%)0.254
Right ankle3/3 (100.0%)5/6 (83.3%)6/6 (100%)5/5 (100.0%)0.110
* Chi-Square test.
Table 6. The median of the angular deviation of body segments according to the visual impairment classification in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 21 children).
Table 6. The median of the angular deviation of body segments according to the visual impairment classification in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 21 children).
Body SegmentsVisual Impairment Classification
Mild
Median (Range)
Moderate
Median (Range)
Severe
Median (Range)
Blindness
Median (Range)
p-Value *
Head34.7 (14.3−36.7)17.5 (1.0−176.9)4.25 (0.3−19.1)4.3 (0.8−30.8)0.243
Shoulder6.5 (1.9−18.4)6.3 (1.1−173.3)4.45 (1.6−17.4)8.8 (4.0−12.2)0.804
Hip9.1 (7.1−17.7)3.3 (0.3−175.2)4.9 (0.0−10.5)2.4 (0.2−8.9)0.438
Right knee40.9 (10.4−109.1)39.25 (1.7−75.9)49.65 (6.3−97.6)25.6 (6.5−113.4)0.971
Left knee64.3 (60.5−66)35.8 (21.2−117.1)43.35 (6.5−135.4)22.7 (7.1−107.5)0.526
Spine2.9 (0.2−12.9)8.15 (0.1−15.4)0.8 (0.7−17.7)2.7 (0.5−37.2)0.908
Left ankle2.4 (2.1−13.6)17.7 (15.1−21.2)13.9 (0.7−54.2)15.0 (2.5−25.9)0.293
Right ankle15.7 (8.6−19.1)12.5 (2.8−30.8)15.85 (7.5−28.8)12.4 (9.8−47.1)0.641
* Mann–Whitney test.
Table 7. The median of the angular deviation of body segments according to the extent of microcephaly in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 19 children).
Table 7. The median of the angular deviation of body segments according to the extent of microcephaly in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 19 children).
Body SegmentsSeverity Microcephalyp-Value *
Less Severe
Median (Range)
Severe
Median (Range)
Head3.7 (0.3–17.9)10.80 (0.8–176.9)0.212
Shoulders6.50 (1.7–10.5)8.80 (1.6–173.3)0.308
Hip4.70 (1.7–9.1)2.40 (0–175.2)0.496
Right knee 10.40 (1.7–49.6)28.90 (6.5–113.4)0.145
Left knee30.70 (6.5–64.3)37.30 (7.1–107.5)0.583
Spine5.30 (0.2–15.4)2.90 (0.5–37.2)0.733
Left ankle11.10 (0.7–21.2)15.10 (1.9–54.2)0.411
Right ankle15.80 (9.2–19.9)12.40 (2.8–47.1)0.910
* Mann–Whitney test.
Table 8. Postural abnormalities/visual impairment between the microcephaly and non-microcephaly groups in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 19 children).
Table 8. Postural abnormalities/visual impairment between the microcephaly and non-microcephaly groups in children with congenital Zika syndrome (n = 19 children).
Microcephaly ClassificationPostural DeviationVisual Impairment Classification [n/total (%)]p-Value
MildModerateSevereBlindness
MildHead1/1(100)1/2(50)1/2(50)0/0(0)1.00
Severe1/1(100)2/2(100)2/3(66.7)3/5(60)1.00
MildShoulder1/1(100)2/2(100)2/2(100)0/0(0)0.545
Severe1/1(100)2/2(100)2/3(66.7)5/5(100)1.00
MildHip1/1(100)2/2(100)2/2(100)0/0(0)1.00
Severe1/1(100)1/2(50)1/3(33.3)3/5(60)1.00
MildRight knee1/1(100)1/2(50)1/2(50)0/0(0)1.00
Severe1/1(100)2/2(100)2/3(66.7)4/5(80)1.00
MildLeft knee1/1(100)2/2(100)1/2(50)0/0(0)1.00
Severe1/1(100)2/2(100)3/3(100)4/5(80)1.00
MildSpine0/1(0)2/2(100)1/2(50)0/0(0)0.600
Severe0/1(0)2/2(100)1/3(33.3)2/5(40.0)0.610
MildRight ankle0/1(0)2/2(100)1/2(50)0/0(0)0.600
Severe0/1(0)2/2(100)2/3(66.7)4/5(80)0.515
MildLeft ankle1/1(100)2/2(100)2/2(100)0/0(0)1.00
Severe1/1(100)1/2(50)3/3(100)5/5(100)0.273
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borba, R.; Rodrigues, A.; Ventura, C.V.; Marques, C.; Nóbrega, L.; Higino, T.; Santos, D.; Sallum, J.; Ventura, L.O. Postural Abnormalities in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome-Related Neurological and Visual Impairment. Viruses 2024, 16, 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121959

AMA Style

Borba R, Rodrigues A, Ventura CV, Marques C, Nóbrega L, Higino T, Santos D, Sallum J, Ventura LO. Postural Abnormalities in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome-Related Neurological and Visual Impairment. Viruses. 2024; 16(12):1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borba, Raíne, Amanda Rodrigues, Camila V. Ventura, Cláudia Marques, Lucélia Nóbrega, Taciana Higino, Dalmir Santos, Juliana Sallum, and Liana O. Ventura. 2024. "Postural Abnormalities in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome-Related Neurological and Visual Impairment" Viruses 16, no. 12: 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121959

APA Style

Borba, R., Rodrigues, A., Ventura, C. V., Marques, C., Nóbrega, L., Higino, T., Santos, D., Sallum, J., & Ventura, L. O. (2024). Postural Abnormalities in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome-Related Neurological and Visual Impairment. Viruses, 16(12), 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop