Indications of Persistent Glycocalyx Damage in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Hypothesis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Subjects and Samples
2.2. Quantification of Serum Markers
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Cohort Characteristics
3.2. Significantly Increased Syndecan-1 Levels in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
3.3. Association of Laboratory Values with Syndecan-1
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; Sehgal, K.; Nair, N.; Mahajan, S.; Sehrawat, T.S.; Bikdeli, B.; Ahluwalia, N.; Ausiello, J.C.; Wan, E.Y.; et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Varga, Z.; Flammer, A.J.; Steiger, P.; Haberecker, M.; Andermatt, R.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Mehra, M.R.; Schuepbach, R.A.; Ruschitzka, F.; Moch, H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, 1417–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pons, S.; Fodil, S.; Azoulay, E.; Zafrani, L. The vascular endothelium: The cornerstone of organ dysfunction in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Okada, H.; Yoshida, S.; Hara, A.; Ogura, S.; Tomita, H. Vascular endothelial injury exacerbates coronavirus disease 2019: The role of endothelial glycocalyx protection. Microcirculation 2021, 28, e12654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teuwen, L.-A.; Geldhof, V.; Pasut, A.; Carmeliet, P. COVID-19: The vasculature unleashed. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 389–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chelazzi, C.; Villa, G.; Mancinelli, P.; de Gaudio, A.R.; Adembri, C. Glycocalyx and sepsis-induced alterations in vascular permeability. Crit. Care 2015, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reitsma, S.; Slaaf, D.W.; Vink, H.; van Zandvoort, M.A.M.J.; oude Egbrink, M.G.A. The endothelial glycocalyx: Composition, functions, and visualization. Pflüg. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2007, 454, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Woodcock, T.E.; Woodcock, T.M. Revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: An improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy. Br. J. Anaesth. 2012, 108, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fraser, D.D.; Patterson, E.K.; Slessarev, M.; Gill, S.E.; Martin, C.; Daley, M.; Miller, M.R.; Patel, M.A.; Dos Santos, C.C.; Bosma, K.J.; et al. Endothelial Injury and Glycocalyx Degradation in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: Implications for Microvascular Platelet Aggregation. Crit. Care Explor. 2020, 2, e0194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Stahl, K.; Gronski, P.A.; Kiyan, Y.; Seeliger, B.; Bertram, A.; Pape, T.; Welte, T.; Hoeper, M.M.; Haller, H.; David, S. Injury to the Endothelial Glycocalyx in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 1178–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ranieri, V.M.; Rubenfeld, G.D.; Thompson, B.T.; Ferguson, N.D.; Caldwell, E.; Fan, E.; Camporota, L.; Slutsky, A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012, 307, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ando, Y.; Okada, H.; Takemura, G.; Suzuki, K.; Takada, C.; Tomita, H.; Zaikokuji, R.; Hotta, Y.; Miyazaki, N.; Yano, H.; et al. Brain-Specific Ultrastructure of Capillary Endothelial Glycocalyx and Its Possible Contribution for Blood Brain Barrier. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brauer, R.; Ge, L.; Schlesinger, S.Y.; Birkland, T.P.; Huang, Y.; Parimon, T.; Lee, V.; McKinney, B.L.; McGuire, J.K.; Parks, W.C.; et al. Syndecan-1 Attenuates Lung Injury during Influenza Infection by Potentiating c-Met Signaling to Suppress Epithelial Apoptosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 194, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yamaoka-Tojo, M. Vascular Endothelial Glycocalyx Damage in COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tepasse, P.-R.; Vollenberg, R.; Fobker, M.; Kabar, I.; Schmidt, H.; Meier, J.A.; Nowacki, T.; Hüsing-Kabar, A. Vitamin A Plasma Levels in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Hypothesis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Q.; Meng, M.; Kumar, R.; Wu, Y.; Huang, J.; Deng, Y.; Weng, Z.; Yang, L. Lymphopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.J.Y.; Lee, K.S.; Ang, L.W.; Leo, Y.S.; Young, B.E. Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Efficacy of Treatment in Patients Infected With COVID-19: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2199–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Karampoor, S.; Zahednasab, H.; Farahmand, M.; Mirzaei, R.; Zamani, F.; Tabibzadeh, A.; Bouzari, B.; Ajdarkosh, H.; Nikkhah, M.; Hashemi, M.R.; et al. A possible pathogenic role of Syndecan-1 in the pathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 97, 107684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ahrens, T.D.; Bang-Christensen, S.R.; Jørgensen, A.M.; Løppke, C.; Spliid, C.B.; Sand, N.T.; Clausen, T.M.; Salanti, A.; Agerbæk, M.Ø. The Role of Proteoglycans in Cancer Metastasis and Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nelson, A.; Berkestedt, I.; Bodelsson, M. Circulating glycosaminoglycan species in septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2014, 58, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wadowski, P.P.; Kautzky-Willer, A.; Gremmel, T.; Koppensteiner, R.; Wolf, P.; Ertl, S.; Weikert, C.; Schörgenhofer, C.; Jilma, B. Sublingual microvasculature in diabetic patients. Microvasc. Res. 2020, 129, 103971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ambrosino, P.; Calcaterra, I.; Molino, A.; Moretta, P.; Lupoli, R.; Spedicato, G.A.; Papa, A.; Motta, A.; Maniscalco, M.; Di Minno, M.N.D. Persistent Endothelial Dysfunction in Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Case-Control Study. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ambrosino, P.; Molino, A.; Calcaterra, I.; Formisano, R.; Stufano, S.; Spedicato, G.A.; Motta, A.; Papa, A.; Di Minno, M.N.D.; Maniscalco, M. Clinical Assessment of Endothelial Function in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chioh, F.W.; Fong, S.-W.; Young, B.E.; Wu, K.-X.; Siau, A.; Krishnan, S.; Chan, Y.-H.; Carissimo, G.; Teo, L.L.; Gao, F.; et al. Convalescent COVID-19 patients are susceptible to endothelial dysfunction due to persistent immune activation. eLife 2021, 10, e64909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]


| Patients (Samples) | Hospitalized Patients (n = 10) | Convalescent Patients (n = 24) | Control Collective (n = 13) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Characteristics | Age, years median (IQR) | 56.5 (54–63) | 56 (55–58) | 54 (51–57) | 0.08 |
| Gender, male (%) | 10 (100) | 22 (91.6) | 4 (31) | 0.046 | |
| BMI (IQR) | 23.8 (22–25.9) | 26.1 (22.8–28.1) | 22.3 (20.2–25.7) | 0.161 | |
| Invasive Vent. (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | |
| Oxygen therapy (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | |
| Death (abs.) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | |
| Interval 1. symptom to blood sample, days (IQR) | 6 (2–17) | 88 (70–135) | <0.001 | ||
| SARS CoV-2 therapy | Remdesivir (5 days) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.151 |
| Dexamethasone (6 mg, 10 days) | 2 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.021 | |
| Pre-existing conditions | Chronic inflammatory disease (%) | 4 (40) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
| Respiratory disease (%) | 3 (30) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.003 | |
| Kidney insufficiency (%) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.151 | |
| Metastatic neoplasm (%) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.151 | |
| Diabetes (%) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.151 | |
| Arterial hypertension (%) | 4 (40) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | <0.001 | |
| Coronary heart disease (%) | 2 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.021 | |
| Medication | Angiotensin-1 receptor antagonist (%) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.151 |
| Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (%) | 2 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.021 |
| Hospitalized Patients (n = 10) | Convalescent Patients (n = 24) | Healthy Controls (n = 14) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syndecan-1 (ng/mL), median (IQR) | 142 (85.2–181.3) | 71.2 (40.1–141.5) | 31.6 (17.1–54.7) | <0.001 |
| Lymphocytes (rel., %), median (IQR) | 22.2(16.5–33.2) | 28.5 (27.2–34.4) | n.d. | 0.23 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 0.95 (0.88–1.3) | 0.9 (0.8–01.0) | 1 (0.8–1.2) | 0.77 |
| Bilirubin (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 0.4 (0.3–0.7) | 0.5 (0.4–1.0) | 0.5 (0.2–0.7) | 0.43 |
| AST (U/L), median (IQR) | 36 (26–52) | 28 (25–34) | 29 (22–35) | 0.63 |
| Gamma-GT (U/L), median (IQR) | 82 (40–146) | 27 (22–46) | 22 (12–24) | 0.003 |
| LDH (U/L), median (IQR) | 279 (232–285) | 61 (57–74) | 149 (127–179) | <0.001 |
| CRP (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 2.5 (0.5–5) | 0.5 (0.5–0.5) | 0.5 (0.5–0.5) | <0.001 |
| Albumin (g/dL), median (IQR) | 3.4 (2.7–3.9) | 4.4 (4.3–4.5) | 4.9 (4.1–5.3) | <0.001 |
| Ferritin (µg/L), median (IQR) | 383 (220–606) | 252 (89–298) | 87 (42–178) | 0.002 |
| Interleukin-6 (pg/mL), median (IQR) | 14.5 (8–23) | 2 (2–2) | 2 (2–2) | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vollenberg, R.; Tepasse, P.-R.; Ochs, K.; Floer, M.; Strauss, M.; Rennebaum, F.; Kabar, I.; Rovas, A.; Nowacki, T. Indications of Persistent Glycocalyx Damage in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Hypothesis. Viruses 2021, 13, 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112324
Vollenberg R, Tepasse P-R, Ochs K, Floer M, Strauss M, Rennebaum F, Kabar I, Rovas A, Nowacki T. Indications of Persistent Glycocalyx Damage in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Hypothesis. Viruses. 2021; 13(11):2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112324
Chicago/Turabian StyleVollenberg, Richard, Phil-Robin Tepasse, Kevin Ochs, Martin Floer, Markus Strauss, Florian Rennebaum, Iyad Kabar, Alexandros Rovas, and Tobias Nowacki. 2021. "Indications of Persistent Glycocalyx Damage in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Hypothesis" Viruses 13, no. 11: 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112324
APA StyleVollenberg, R., Tepasse, P.-R., Ochs, K., Floer, M., Strauss, M., Rennebaum, F., Kabar, I., Rovas, A., & Nowacki, T. (2021). Indications of Persistent Glycocalyx Damage in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Hypothesis. Viruses, 13(11), 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112324

