Next Article in Journal
The Progestin Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Affects HIV-1 Production in Human Lymphoid Tissue Explants in a Dose-Dependent and Glucocorticoid-like Fashion
Next Article in Special Issue
Basic Study for Vaccine Development Targeting Virus Infections
Previous Article in Journal
TDP-43 and HERV-K Envelope-Specific Immunogenic Epitopes Are Recognized in ALS Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Control of Zika Virus Infection Induced by a Non-Replicating Adenovector Encoding Zika Virus NS1/NS2 Antigens Fused to the MHC Class II-Associated Invariant Chain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/v13112302
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Overview of Recent Insights into the Response of TLR to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Potential of TLR Agonists as SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Adjuvants

by
Mohammad Enamul Hoque Kayesh
1,2,
Michinori Kohara
3 and
Kyoko Tsukiyama-Kohara
1,*
1
Transboundary Animal Diseases Centre, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan
2
Department of Microbiology and Public Health, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Barishal 8210, Bangladesh
3
Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(11), 2302; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112302
Submission received: 11 October 2021 / Revised: 10 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Basic Studies for Vaccine Development Targeting Virus Infections)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), a global health pandemic causing millions of deaths worldwide. However, the immunopathogenesis of COVID-19, particularly the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host innate immunity, remains unclear. The innate immune system acts as the first line of host defense, which is critical for the initial detection of invading pathogens and the activation and shaping of adaptive immunity. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are key sensors of innate immunity that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and activate downstream signaling for pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production. However, TLRs may also act as a double-edged sword, and dysregulated TLR responses may enhance immune-mediated pathology, instead of providing protection. Therefore, a proper understanding of the interaction between TLRs and SARS-CoV-2 is of great importance for devising therapeutic and preventive strategies. The use of TLR agonists as vaccine adjuvants for human disease is a promising approach that could be applied in the investigation of COVID-19 vaccines. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of host innate immune responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection, with particular focus on TLR response. In addition, we discuss the use of TLR agonists as vaccine adjuvants in enhancing the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine.

1. Introduction

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are agents of emerging and re-emerging infection that pose a significant challenge to human health [1]. CoVs have a wide host range, including a variety of avian and mammalian species [2,3]. CoVs are members of the family Coronaviridae, which has four genera, including Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Gammacoronavirus, and Deltacoronavirus [4]. The first human CoV, B814, was reported in 1965 [5]. To date, seven human CoVs (HCoVs) have been identified, including two alpha-CoVs (HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63) and five beta-CoVs (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) [4]. However, SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most pathogenic and highly infectious zoonotic CoVs. SARS-CoV-2 contains a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome, with a size of 29.9 kb [6]. It contains 4 structural proteins, including surface (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) [7]; 16 non-structural proteins (NSP1–16); and nine accessory proteins [8]. The ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was caused by SARS-CoV-2 [9], which is the third zoonotic CoV infecting humans in a short span of only two decades, after the emergence of SARS-CoV in 2002 [10] and MERS-CoV in 2012 [11]. Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China in December 2019, it has rapidly spread worldwide, and as of 30 September 2021, there have been 233,136,147 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 4,771,408 deaths globally [12]. The COVID-19 epidemic was declared a global pandemic on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization and still continues [13]. The immunopathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. In addition, several new variants of the virus have also evolved, which may threaten the success of the currently available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [14]. Thus, there is a need for further investigation of the host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, including newly emerging variants, as well as the efficacy of vaccines against them.
The innate immune system is a key component of host immunity and acts as the first line of defense against invading pathogens, including viruses [15]. The innate immune response is elicited upon detection of conserved structures on microbes, which are known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [16]. The key innate immune sensing receptors are germ line-encoded pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), which mediate the initial sensing of infection by recognition of PAMPs, upon microbial invasion of the host [17,18]. PRRs recognize molecules released by damaged cells, which are known as damage-associated molecular patterns [19]. PRRs belong to different families, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG)-like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein-like receptors, C-type lectin receptors, and DNA-sensing receptors [16,17]. TLRs are the key components of innate immunity that are evolutionarily conserved and play an important role in early host defense [15,17], by recognizing PAMPs of invading microorganisms, initiating innate immune responses, and shaping adaptive immunity [20,21,22]. TLRs are encoded by a large gene family that includes 10 and 12 members in humans (TLR1–TLR10) and mice (TLR1–TLR9 and TLR11–TLR13), respectively [23]. TLRs can be localized either on the cell surface, such as TLRs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 10, or on the endoplasmic reticulum, such as TLRs 3, 7, 8, and 9 [24,25]. TLR response ultimately may lead to the induction of interferons (IFNs), cytokines, and chemokines by several distinct signaling pathways, thereby limiting infection and promoting adaptive immune responses [17,26]. However, TLR activation may act as a double-edged sword, and its dysregulated response may lead to immune-mediated pathology, instead of protection [27,28,29], which has also been observed in cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [30]. Therefore, a clear understanding of the role of TLRs in SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical for learning about the immunopathogenesis involved and for the development of therapeutic and preventive strategies against the disease. The focus of this article is to provide an overview of our recent understanding of TLR response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, the potential of TLR agonists as adjuvants for COVID-19 vaccines has also been discussed herein.

2. TLR Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

The innate immune response is a key issue to act as the first line of defense against many viral infections [31]. However, the innate immune response does not always work for the host defense but also induces pathogenesis [32]. TLRs constitute the most important family of PRRs. TLR signaling is involved in the regulation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines secretion working for early innate immune responses and adaptive immunity [33]. TLR activation can act as a double-edged sword, which may activate immune-mediated pathogenesis instead of inducing an immune response which works for defense against pathogens [27,28,34].
The host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical in determining the severity of COVID-19 [35]. It is assumed that cytokine storms, which are the consequence of hyperinflammation driven by innate immunity, play an important role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 [36]; however, the underlying mechanisms of the altered pathological inflammation in COVID-19 remain largely unknown. Nevertheless, previous studies on related CoVs, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [37,38,39,40], have enhanced our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, in silico studies have also promoted the understanding of SARS-CoV-2 interactions in the host. It has been indicated that cell surface TLRs, mainly TLR4, are most likely to be involved in sensing molecular patterns, including SARS-CoV-2 S protein, to induce inflammatory responses [41,42]. It has been reported that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein S1 subunit can induce pro-inflammatory cytokines through TLR4 signaling in murine and human macrophages, and inhibition of TLR4 by using its antagonist attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine induction [43], suggesting that TLR4 is a therapeutic target for controlling COVID-19 severity caused by TLR4-mediated hyperinflammation. Another in vitro study also demonstrated the sensing of SARS-CoV-2 S protein by TLR4 and subsequent induction of interleukin (IL)-1B [44]. It has also been indicated that SARS-CoV-2 S protein can bind to bacterial lipopolysaccharide, a ligand for TLR4 activation [45]. SARS-CoV-2-mediated TLR4 and TLR7 upregulation upon periodic thermomechanical modulation has been observed in adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells [46]. The expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase M (IRAK-M), a negative regulator of TLR signaling [47], is suppressed by SARS-CoV-2 S protein in macrophages [48], which may promote pro-inflammatory cytokine production.
It is considered that pro-inflammatory cytokines greatly contribute to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and its severity. Zheng et al. reported the sensing of SARS-CoV-2 E protein by TLR2, which results in the hyperexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Figure 1) that may contribute to disease severity [30], suggesting that TLR2-mediated inflammation plays a pathogenic role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. TLR1, TLR4, TLR5, TLR8, and TLR9 expression levels were also significantly elevated in severe and critical COVID-19 patients; however, TLR3 expression was not correlated with the development of COVID-19, and an increased expression of TLR7 was observed only in patients with moderate COVID-19 [30]. In a preprint study, another group reported TLR2 activation by SARS-CoV-2 S protein, but not the E protein, and subsequent production of cytokines and chemokines (Figure 1) in human and mouse macrophages [49]. Although this study supports the sensing of SARS-CoV-2 by TLR2, it differs in terms of the sensing protein reported in a previous study [30], which requires further investigation [50].
Another study reported that alveolar macrophages activated by SARS-CoV-2 through TLR signaling may produce IL-1, which further stimulates mast cells to produce IL-6 [51]. In addition, an association between mast cell/eosinophil activation and COVID-19 inflammation was reported [52]. A significantly elevated expression of IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) was found to be associated with TLR expression in obese individuals but not in the controls [53]. TLR/myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MYD88) signaling, which is upregulated in obese individuals, may contribute to the excessive inflammatory response observed in severe infection with SARS-CoV-2 [54].
It is also hypothesized that desensitization of TLR7 signaling may occur due to chronic stimulation of TLR7 by intrinsic substrates in obese and elderly people. This may support the virus to replicate more easily, which upon re-sensitization of TLR7 signaling due to severe viral infection could result in an overwhelming TLR7 response that may promote the development of severe COVID-19 [55]. Several studies have shown that the TLR7 response is critical for favorable outcome of COVID-19 [56,57], highlighting the clinical importance of the innate immune system in SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, in an in vitro study, it has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 induces a TLR7/8-dependent type I and III IFN response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which could be protective or may contribute to the cytokine storm observed in COVID-19 [58] and requires future investigation. Although there is a need for further investigation in this regard, IFN-α2b treatment has been shown to reduce viral replication, as well as IL-6 and CRP levels [59]. There was an upregulation in the levels of TLR4-mediated inflammatory signaling molecules in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from COVID-19 patients (Figure 1), as compared to those in the healthy controls, which may suggest an involvement of TLR4 signaling in the induction of pathological inflammation during COVID-19, suggesting that targeting TLR4-mediated inflammation may serve as a new therapeutic strategy [60]. Therefore, TLR2 and TLR4 signaling might be involved in the induction of pro-inflammatory mediators. Infrared light therapy has been shown to decrease TLR4-dependent induction of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, INF-α, and INF-β in COVID-19 hyperinflammation [61]. It was observed that a child with hepatitis after SARS-CoV-2 infection had a polymorphism, Gln11Leu (rs179008), in TLR7 [62], which could impair an efficient initial immune response. Elevated cytokine levels have been linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults (median age, 51 years) [63]. Another study observed elevated levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in children with COVID-19, as compared to those in controls; however, the increased levels of these cytokines lacked any correlation with disease severity [64]. It has also been reported that human biological sex, including sex steroids, sex chromosomes, and genomic and epigenetic differences between two sexes, might play a significant role in heterogeneous COVID-19 outcomes by impacting host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection [65]. It has been reported that sensing of viral RNA by TLR7 is sex-biased, where TLR7 escapes X chromosome inactivation, resulting in greater expression in female immune cells [66]. However, TLR response in SARS-CoV-2 infection based on sex differences largely remains to be investigated. Aging impacts both innate and adaptive arms of the immune system, and TLR expression and function may decline with increased age, which may affect controlling of viral infections [67,68]. Aging is linked to high morbidity and mortality in various infections [69], which is also applicable for SARS-CoV-2 infection [70,71]. However, the exact role of aging in TLR response against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains to be investigated. A multi-omics study of immunological responses in COVID-19 patients also revealed increased cytokines and chemokines levels in severe COVID-19 patients [72], which is also consistent with the findings of a previous study [73].
IFN signaling cascade is crucial for controlling viral infection. It has been demonstrated that hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is a direct transcriptional suppressor of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), the transcriptional activators of type-I IFN, and hypoxia suppresses type-I IFN but not NF-κB-dependent pro-inflammatory cytokine production [74], which may at least partly explain COVID-19 pathogenesis. Increased expression of HIF-1α mRNA has also been reported in myeloid blood cells from critically ill COVID-19 patients, along with the expression of other genes, TLR2 and TLR4 [75], which could be involved in SARS-CoV-2 sensing. A predominance of cells co-expressing HIF-1α and TLR2 has also been reported [75]. Another study revealed that peripheral blood immune cells from severe COVID-19 patients have diminished type-I IFN response but enhanced pro-inflammatory IL-6 and TNF-α responses [76].
In an in vitro study, it was shown that there was no inhibitory effect of famotidine, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist, on SARS-CoV-2 proteases [77]; however, although famotidine has been found to reduce the risk of intubation and death in COVID-19 patients [78,79], the mechanism involved remains unknown. Recently, it has been reported that famotidine inhibits TLR3-dependent signaling processes that culminate in the activation of IRF3 and the NF-κB pathway in SARS-CoV-2 infection [80]. In response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived lung organoids, most of the key genes associated with innate immunity, cytokine/chemokines, and inflammasomes, including STAT1/2, IRF7, CCL5, CXCL10, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IFN were upregulated. In the case of human iPSC-derived neuronal cells, in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, TLR3, TLR7, OAS2, complement system, and apoptotic genes were found to be activated [81]. These findings may further enhance our understanding of COVID-19 pathogenesis. Lactoferrin, a naturally occurring non-toxic glycoprotein of the transferrin family, which is synthesized by exocrine glands and neutrophils, has been shown to partially inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells and also induce the expression of TLR3, TLR7, IFNA1, IFNB1, IRF3, IRF7, and MAVS genes [82], which could be linked to the suppression of viral replication.
Type I and III IFNs are key antiviral mediators against SARS-CoV-2 infection. An in-depth analysis of the transcriptional response to SARS-CoV-2 revealed suppression of type I and III IFN responses, in addition to induction of chemokine and pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression [83]. One preprint study demonstrated the restriction of SARS-CoV-2 spread by a local IFN-I/III response produced by pDCs; in addition, pDCs response was found to be correlated with the severity of the disease, and the response was impaired in severe COVID-19 patients [84]. Bastard et al. reported that neutralizing auto-antibodies (Abs) against type I IFNs associated with severe COVID-19, of which male patients had the vast majority (95/101, 94%), is suggestive of gender linkage to pathogenic gene encoding auto-Abs [85]. SARS-CoV-2 also possesses the strategies to escape the innate immune response by encoding a wide range of viral structural and nonstructural protein (nsp), affecting the IFN signaling pathway and impairing the IFN-mediated antiviral responses [86,87]. It has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 ORF9b negatively regulates antiviral immunity by suppressing several components of innate immune signaling, including RIG-I, MDA-5, MAVS, TBK1, and IKKε, thereby facilitating viral replication [88]. It has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 nsp6 and nsp13 inhibit IRF-3 phosphorylation by binding TANK binding kinase 1 (TBK1), resulting in a reduced production of IFN-β, while the ORF6 prevents IRF-3 nuclear translocation by binding importin Karyopherin α2 [87,89]. Another study found that SARS-CoV-2 ORF6, ORF8, and nucleocapsid proteins can inhibit type I IFN signaling pathway [90]. It has been demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 M protein can suppress the expression of IFN-β expression through ubiquitin-mediated degradation of TBK1 [91]. For further details on the immune evasion strategies of SARS-CoV-2, please see the recently published review [92]. However, future investigations are required for clear understanding of the inhibition of TLR signaling by SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, further investigations are required for a clear understanding of the innate immune response, including TLR response, which may open up a new window for therapeutic and preventive strategies against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

3. TLR Agonists as COVID-19 Vaccine Adjuvants

There is a growing interest in the use of TLR agonists as immunomodulators for the treatment of inflammation, cancer, infection, allergy, and autoimmunity. The use of TLR agonists to modify immunotherapeutic effects also appears promising [93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. Moreover, TLRs, which are considered as important triggering molecules of trained immunity, trigger a long-term boosting of innate immune responses [100]. To combat the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a critical need for the development of efficient and safe vaccines. Vaccine adjuvants are important for enhancing the immune response against corresponding pathogens, and selecting an appropriate adjuvant is important for vaccine efficacy [101]. It has been reported that second-generation adjuvants that interact with TLRs, such as TLR ligand adjuvants, are superior to first-generation adjuvants, such as Al(OH)3. TLR agonist adjuvants may induce dendritic cell maturation, which is lacking in first-generation adjuvants, such as Al(OH)3 [102]. TLR agonists are capable of stimulating innate immune responses, which also trigger adaptive immune responses, thereby improving vaccine efficacy.
Subunit vaccines, for which adjuvants are required to enhance the magnitude and durability of immune responses, are the safest and most widely used vaccine platforms that are suitable against a multitude of infectious diseases. In a study of SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccines, the combined use of TLR1/2 and TLR3 agonist (L-pampo) was found to be a potent adjuvant; the SARS-CoV-2 antigens, along with L-pampo, induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses, with a substantial decrease in viral load, in a ferret model [103]. In another study, it was shown that the TLR2/6 agonist INNA-051 significantly reduced viral RNA levels in throat swabs (96% reduction) and nasal wash (93% reduction) [104], which requires further investigation and may support the clinical development of a therapy based on the prophylactic use of TLR2/6 agonist. The first plant polymer-based TLR4 agonist, inulin acetate, which is synthesized from plant polysaccharide inulin [105], has been reported to induce strong systemic and mucosal immunity [106] and may be useful in the development of a COVID-19 vaccine. CpG ODN, Poly I:C, and resiquimod (R848), which are agonists of TLR9, TLR3, and TLR7/8, respectively, were evaluated in candidate vaccines against SARS-CoV [107], which also supports an investigation into SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
In a previous study, CD8+ T cells were found to be augmented to varying degrees by CpG ODN, PolyI:C, and R848 [107]; it has also been reported that CD8+ T cell responses might play significant role in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection [108,109]. However, alum lacks the ability to stimulate CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses, which has been shown to coordinate with the antibody responses toward protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 [110]. Recently, the efficacy of a COVID-19 subunit vaccine in promoting protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 was investigated in rhesus macaques [111]. The vaccine contained the SARS-CoV-2 S protein receptor-binding domain displayed on an I53-50 protein nanoparticle scaffold with five different adjuvants, including a squalene-in-water emulsion (Essai O/W 1849101), an α-tocopherol-containing oil-in-water emulsion (AS03), a TLR7 agonist adsorbed to alum (AS37), a TLR9 agonist formulated in alum (CpG1018-alum), and alum. Notably, variations in the neutralizing antibody production were observed due to the adjuvant differences [111], which indicates that the selection of an adjuvant is critical for vaccine efficacy. In a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the SCB-2019 vaccine, comprising of S-trimer protein formulated with either AS03 or CpG/Alum adjuvants, induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, with high viral neutralizing activity [112]. Both the adjuvanted vaccine formulations were well tolerated and supported further clinical development [112]. It has been suggested that TLR agonists, including imiquimod, an immune stimulator of TLR7, could serve as an effective therapeutic approach in the early stages of COVID-19 [113] and could be more favorable. However, so far, no phase II and III clinical trial results of TLR agonists for COVID-19 vaccines have been published. The TLR agonists currently under development for COVID-19 vaccines are listed in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

Current evidence suggests that the hyperinflammation that results from a dysregulated host innate immune response has a negative effect on the COVID-19 outcome. The innate immune response appears to be a double-edged sword in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Its dysregulated signaling may lead to the production of detrimental pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that cause severe disease, instead of providing protection [30]. In this review, we discussed the important role of TLRs in shaping the innate response in SARS-CoV-2 infection. From the currently available data, it is assumed that TLRs, mainly TLR2 and TLR4, may play a pathogenic role by inducing hyperinflammation, and thus, may lead to severe COVID-19. The use of TLR antagonists targeting TLR2 and TLR4 might exert a beneficial effect, by attenuating the deleterious hyperinflammatory response triggered by TLR2 and TLR4 upon sensing SARS-CoV-2 S or E protein; thus, this approach warrants further investigation. In addition, a timely optimum TLR response, mainly mediated by TLR3 and TLR7, could play a protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Application of adjuvant with RBD-NP can enhance neutralizing antibody production and CD4 T cell responses through TLRs. It is understood that optimal IFN production and controlled inflammation are necessary for reducing COVID-19 pathogenesis caused by excessive cytokine production, which could be achieved through the regulation of the TLR-mediated response [114,115]. Therefore, it is critical to obtain a clear understanding of TLR interactions in SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may provide a new basis for the development of therapeutic and preventive approaches to fight the disease, including a TLR agonist-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.H.K., M.K. and K.T.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.H.K.; writing—review and editing, M.E.H.K., M.K. and K.T.-K.; supervision, K.T.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government for the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, V.C.C.; Lau, S.K.P.; Woo, P.C.Y.; Yuen, K.-Y. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus as an Agent of Emerging and Reemerging Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 660–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Su, S.; Wong, G.; Shi, W.; Liu, J.; Lai, A.C.K.; Zhou, J.; Liu, W.; Bi, Y.; Gao, G.F. Epidemiology, Genetic Recombination, and Pathogenesis of Coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cavanagh, D. Coronaviruses in poultry and other birds. Avian Pathol. 2005, 34, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cui, J.; Li, F.; Shi, Z.-L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kapikian, A.Z. The coronaviruses. Dev. Biol. Stand. 1975, 28, 42–64. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Guo, D. Emerging coronaviruses: Genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yadav, R.; Chaudhary, J.; Jain, N.; Chaudhary, P.; Khanra, S.; Dhamija, P.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, A.; Handu, S. Role of Structural and Non-Structural Proteins and Therapeutic Targets of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19. Cells 2021, 10, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Peiris, J.S.M.; Chu, C.M.; Cheng, V.; Chan, K.; Hung, I.F.N.; Poon, L.; Law, K.; Tang, B.; Hon, T.; Chan, C.; et al. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: A prospective study. Lancet 2003, 361, 1767–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zaki, A.M.; Van Boheemen, S.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Fouchier, R.A.M. Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a Man with Pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  13. Cucinotta, D.; Vanelli, M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Harvey, W.T.; Carabelli, A.M.; Jackson, B.; Gupta, R.K.; Thomson, E.C.; Harrison, E.M.; Ludden, C.; Reeve, R.; Rambaut, A.; Peacock, S.J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 19, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Medzhitov, R.; Janeway, C. Innate Immunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mogensen, T.H. Pathogen Recognition and Inflammatory Signaling in Innate Immune Defenses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 240–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Takeuchi, O.; Akira, S. Pattern Recognition Receptors and Inflammation. Cell 2010, 140, 805–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Akira, S.; Uematsu, S.; Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006, 124, 783–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Amarante-Mendes, G.P.; Adjemian, S.; Branco, L.M.; Zanetti, L.; Weinlich, R.; Bortoluci, K.R. Pattern Recognition Receptors and the Host Cell Death Molecular Machinery. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Akira, S.; Takeda, K.; Kaisho, T. Toll-like receptors: Critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iwasaki, A.; Medzhitov, R. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takeda, K.; Akira, S. Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int. Immunol. 2005, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kawasaki, T.; Kawai, T. Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Pathways. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. O’Neill, L.A.J.; Golenbock, D.T.; Bowie, A. The history of Toll-like receptors—Redefining innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chaturvedi, A.; Pierce, S.K. How Location Governs Toll-Like Receptor Signaling. Traffic 2009, 10, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. Toll-like Receptors and Their Crosstalk with Other Innate Receptors in Infection and Immunity. Immunity 2011, 34, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Yokota, S.-I.; Okabayashi, T.; Fujii, N. The Battle between Virus and Host: Modulation of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Pathways by Virus Infection. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 184328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Huang, B.; Zhao, J.; Unkeless, J.C.; Feng, Z.H.; Xiong, H. TLR signaling by tumor and immune cells: A double-edged sword. Oncogene 2008, 27, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ebermeyer, T.; Cognasse, F.; Berthelot, P.; Mismetti, P.; Garraud, O.; Hamzeh-Cognasse, H. Platelet Innate Immune Receptors and TLRs: A Double-Edged Sword. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, M.; Karki, R.; Williams, E.P.; Yang, D.; Fitzpatrick, E.; Vogel, P.; Jonsson, C.B.; Kanneganti, T.-D. TLR2 senses the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein to produce inflammatory cytokines. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zuniga, E.I.; Macal, M.; Lewis, G.M.; Harker, J.A. Innate and Adaptive Immune Regulation during Chronic Viral Infections. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2015, 2, 573–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Modhiran, N.; Watterson, D.; Muller, D.A.; Panetta, A.K.; Sester, D.P.; Liu, L.; Hume, D.A.; Stacey, K.J.; Young, P.R. Dengue virus NS1 protein activates cells via Toll-like receptor 4 and disrupts endothelial cell monolayer integrity. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 304ra142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ozato, K.; Tsujimura, H.; Tamura, T. Toll-Like Receptor Signaling and Regulation of Cytokine Gene Expression in the Immune System. Biotechniques 2002, 33, S66–S75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Salaun, B.; Romero, P.; Lebecque, S. Toll-like receptors’ two-edged sword: When immunity meets apoptosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 3311–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, B.M.; Hill, H.R. Role of Host Immune and Inflammatory Responses in COVID-19 Cases with Underlying Primary Immunodeficiency: A Review. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2020, 40, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ye, Q.; Wang, B.; Mao, J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sheahan, T.; Morrison, T.E.; Funkhouser, W.; Uematsu, S.; Akira, S.; Baric, R.S.; Heise, M.T. MyD88 Is Required for Protection from Lethal Infection with a Mouse-Adapted SARS-CoV. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Totura, A.; Whitmore, A.; Agnihothram, S.; Schäfer, A.; Katze, M.G.; Heise, M.T.; Baric, R.S. Toll-Like Receptor 3 Signaling via TRIF Contributes to a Protective Innate Immune Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. MBio 2015, 6, e00638-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, Y.; Liu, L. The Membrane Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Functions as a Novel Cytosolic Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern to Promote Beta Interferon Induction via a Toll-Like-Receptor-Related TRAF3-Independent Mechanism. MBio 2016, 7, e01872-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Spiegel, M.; Weber, F. Inhibition of cytokine gene expression and induction of chemokine genes in non-lymphatic cells infected with SARS coronavirus. Virol. J. 2006, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bhattacharya, M.; Sharma, A.R.; Mallick, B.; Sharma, G.; Lee, S.-S.; Chakraborty, C. Immunoinformatics approach to understand molecular interaction between multi-epitopic regions of SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein with TLR4/MD-2 complex. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 85, 104587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choudhury, A.; Mukherjee, S. In silico studies on the comparative characterization of the interactions of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein with ACE-2 receptor homologs and human TLRs. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 2105–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shirato, K.; Kizaki, T. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, Y.; Kuang, M.; Li, J.; Zhu, L.; Jia, Z.; Guo, X.; Hu, Y.; Kong, J.; Yin, H.; Wang, X.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with and activates TLR41. Cell Res. 2021, 31, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Petruk, G.; Puthia, M.; Petrlova, J.; Samsudin, F.; Strömdahl, A.-C.; Cerps, S.; Uller, L.; Kjellström, S.; Bond, P.J.; Schmidtchen, A.A. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and boosts proinflammatory activity. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 12, 916–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, X.; Nie, Y.; Wang, W.; Ma, N.; Lendlein, A. Periodic thermomechanical modulation of toll-like receptor expression and distribution in mesenchymal stromal cells. MRS Commun. 2021, 11, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kobayashi, K.; Hernandez, L.D.; Galán, J.E.; Janeway, C.A.; Medzhitov, R.; Flavell, R.A. IRAK-M Is a Negative Regulator of Toll-like Receptor Signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Pantazi, I.; Al-Qahtani, A.A.; Alhamlan, F.S.; Alothaid, H.; Matou-Nasri, S.; Sourvinos, G.; Vergadi, E.; Tsatsanis, C. SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 Interaction Suppresses IRAK-M Expression and Promotes Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Production in Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 683800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khan, S.; Shafiei, M.S.; Longoria, C.; Schoggins, J.; Savani, R.C.; Zaki, H. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sariol, A.; Perlman, S. SARS-CoV-2 takes its Toll. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 801–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Conti, P.; Caraffa, A.; Tete, G.; Gallenga, C.E.; Ross, R.; Kritas, S.K.; Frydas, I.; Younes, A.; Di Emidio, P.; Ronconi, G. Mast cells activated by SARS-CoV-2 release histamine which increases IL-1 levels causing cytokine storm and inflammatory reaction in COVID-19. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 1629–1632. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gebremeskel, S.; Schanin, J.; Coyle, K.M.; Butuci, M.; Luu, T.; Brock, E.C.; Xu, A.; Wong, A.; Leung, J.; Korver, W.; et al. Mast Cell and Eosinophil Activation Are Associated With COVID-19 and TLR-Mediated Viral Inflammation: Implications for an Anti-Siglec-8 Antibody. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ahmad, R.; Al-Mass, A.; Atizado, V.; Al-Hubail, A.; Al-Ghimlas, F.; Al-Arouj, M.; Bennakhi, A.; Dermime, S.; Behbehani, K. Elevated expression of the toll like receptors 2 and 4 in obese individuals: Its significance for obesity-induced inflammation. J. Inflamm. 2012, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Cuevas, A.M.; Clark, J.M.; Potter, J.J. Increased TLR/MyD88 signaling in patients with obesity: Is there a link to COVID-19 disease severity? Int. J. Obes. 2021, 45, 1152–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Englmeier, L. A theory on SARS-COV-2 susceptibility: Reduced TLR7-activity as a mechanistic link between men, obese and elderly. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 1125–1129. [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Der Made, C.I.; Simons, A.; Schuurs-Hoeijmakers, J.; Heuvel, G.V.D.; Mantere, T.; Kersten, S.; Van Deuren, R.C.; Steehouwer, M.; Van Reijmersdal, S.V.; Jaeger, M.; et al. Presence of Genetic Variants Among Young Men With Severe COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 324, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fallerini, C.; Daga, S.; Mantovani, S.; Benetti, E.; Picchiotti, N.; Francisci, D.; Paciosi, F.; Schiaroli, E.; Baldassarri, M.; Fava, F.; et al. Association of Toll-like receptor 7 variants with life-threatening COVID-19 disease in males: Findings from a nested case-control study. eLife 2021, 10, e67569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Severa, M.; Diotti, R.A.; Etna, M.P.; Rizzo, F.; Fiore, S.; Ricci, D.; Iannetta, M.; Sinigaglia, A.; Lodi, A.; Mancini, N.; et al. Differential plasmacytoid dendritic cell phenotype and type I Interferon response in asymptomatic and severe COVID-19 infection. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhou, Q.; Chen, V.; Shannon, C.P.; Wei, X.-S.; Xiang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.-H.; Tebbutt, S.J.; Kollmann, T.R.; Fish, E.N. Interferon-α2b Treatment for COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sohn, K.M.; Lee, S.-G.; Kim, H.J.; Cheon, S.; Jeong, H.; Lee, J.; Kim, I.S.; Silwal, P.; Kim, Y.J.; Paik, S.; et al. COVID-19 Patients Upregulate Toll-like Receptor 4-mediated Inflammatory Signaling That Mimics Bacterial Sepsis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, e343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aguida, B.; Pooam, M.; Ahmad, M.; Jourdan, N. Infrared light therapy relieves TLR-4 dependent hyper-inflammation of the type induced by COVID-19. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2021, 14, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pessoa, N.L.; Bentes, A.A.; de Carvalho, A.L.; Silva, T.B.D.S.; Alves, P.A.; Reis, E.V.D.S.; Rodrigues, T.A.; Kroon, E.G.; Campos, M.A. Case report: Hepatitis in a child infected with SARS-CoV-2 presenting toll-like receptor 7 Gln11Leu single nucleotide polymorphism. Virol. J. 2021, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wu, C.; Chen, X.; Cai, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhou, X.; Xu, S.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, X.; Du, C.; et al. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Curatola, A.; Chiaretti, A.; Ferretti, S.; Bersani, G.; Lucchetti, D.; Capossela, L.; Sgambato, A.; Gatto, A. Cytokine Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children. Viruses 2021, 13, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Scully, E.P.; Haverfield, J.; Ursin, R.L.; Tannenbaum, C.; Klein, S.L. Considering how biological sex impacts immune responses and COVID-19 outcomes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Souyris, M.; Cenac, C.; Azar, P.; Daviaud, D.; Canivet, A.; Grunenwald, S.; Pienkowski, C.; Chaumeil, J.; Mejía, J.E.; Guéry, J.-C. TLR7 escapes X chromosome inactivation in immune cells. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Leng, J.; Goldstein, D.R. Impact of aging on viral infections. Microbes Infect. 2010, 12, 1120–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Oh, S.-J.; Lee, J.K.; Shin, O.S. Aging and the Immune System: The Impact of Immunosenescence on Viral Infection, Immunity and Vaccine Immunogenicity. Immune Netw. 2019, 19, e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bartleson, J.M.; Radenkovic, D.; Covarrubias, A.J.; Furman, D.; Winer, D.A.; Verdin, E. SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and the aging immune system. Nat. Aging 2021, 1, 769–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Williamson, E.J.; Walker, A.J.; Bhaskaran, K.; Bacon, S.; Bates, C.; Morton, C.E.; Curtis, H.J.; Mehrkar, A.; Evans, D.; Inglesby, P.; et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 2020, 584, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Richardson, S.; Hirsch, J.S.; Narasimhan, M.; Crawford, J.M.; McGinn, T.; Davidson, K.W.; Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA 2020, 323, 2052–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Su, Y.; Chen, D.; Yuan, D.; Lausted, C.; Choi, J.; Dai, C.L.; Voillet, V.; Duvvuri, V.R.; Scherler, K.; Troisch, P.; et al. Multi-Omics Resolves a Sharp Disease-State Shift between Mild and Moderate COVID-19. Cell 2020, 183, 1479–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lucas, C.; Wong, P.; Klein, J.; Castro, T.B.R.; Silva, J.; Sundaram, M.; Ellingson, M.K.; Mao, T.; Oh, J.E.; Israelow, B.; et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 584, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Peng, T.; Du, S.-Y.; Son, M.; Diamond, B. HIF-1α is a negative regulator of interferon regulatory factors: Implications for interferon production by hypoxic monocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2106017118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Taniguchi-Ponciano, K.; Vadillo, E.; Mayani, H.; Gonzalez-Bonilla, C.R.; Torres, J.; Majluf, A.; Flores-Padilla, G.; Wacher-Rodarte, N.; Galan, J.C.; Ferat-Osorio, E.; et al. Increased expression of hypoxia-induced factor 1α mRNA and its related genes in myeloid blood cells from critically ill COVID-19 patients. Ann. Med. 2021, 53, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hadjadj, J.; Yatim, N.; Barnabei, L.; Corneau, A.; Boussier, J.; Smith, N.; Péré, H.; Charbit, B.; Bondet, V.; Chenevier-Gobeaux, C.; et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science 2020, 369, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Loffredo, M.; Lucero, H.; Chen, D.-Y.; O’Connell, A.; Bergqvist, S.; Munawar, A.; Bandara, A.; De Graef, S.; Weeks, S.D.; Douam, F.; et al. The in-vitro effect of famotidine on SARS-CoV-2 proteases and virus replication. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Freedberg, D.E.; Conigliaro, J.; Wang, T.C.; Tracey, K.J.; Callahan, M.V.; Abrams, J.A.; Sobieszczyk, M.E.; Markowitz, D.D.; Gupta, A.; O’Donnell, M.R.; et al. Famotidine Use Is Associated With Improved Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 1129–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mather, J.F.; Seip, R.L.; McKay, R.G. Impact of Famotidine Use on Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 1617–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mukherjee, R.; Bhattacharya, A.; Bojkova, D.; Mehdipour, A.R.; Shin, D.; Khan, K.S.; Cheung, H.H.-Y.; Wong, K.-B.; Ng, W.-L.; Cinatl, J.; et al. Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 100925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tiwari, S.K.; Wang, S.; Smith, D.; Carlin, A.F.; Rana, T.M. Revealing Tissue-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Host Responses using Human Stem Cell-Derived Lung and Cerebral Organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 16, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Salaris, C.; Scarpa, M.; Elli, M.; Bertolini, A.; Guglielmetti, S.; Pregliasco, F.; Blandizzi, C.; Brun, P.; Castagliuolo, I. Protective Effects of Lactoferrin against SARS-CoV-2 Infection In Vitro. Nutrients 2021, 13, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Blanco-Melo, D.; Nilsson-Payant, B.E.; Liu, W.-C.; Uhl, S.; Hoagland, D.; Møller, R.; Jordan, T.X.; Oishi, K.; Panis, M.; Sachs, D.; et al. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19. Cell 2020, 181, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Venet, M.; Ribeiro, M.S.; Décembre, E.; Bellomo, A.; Joshi, G.; Villard, M.; Cluet, D.; Perret, M.; Pescamona, R.; Paidassi, H.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infected cells trigger an acute antiviral response mediated by Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in mild but not severe COVID-19 patients. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bastard, P.; Rosen, L.B.; Zhang, Q.; Michailidis, E.; Hoffmann, H.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Dorgham, K.; Philippot, Q.; Rosain, J.; Béziat, V.; et al. Auto-antibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Park, A.; Iwasaki, A. Type I and Type III Interferons—Induction, Signaling, Evasion, and Application to Combat COVID-19. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lei, X.; Dong, X.; Ma, R.; Wang, W.; Xiao, X.; Tian, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Ren, L.; et al. Activation and evasion of type I interferon responses by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Han, L.; Zhuang, M.; Deng, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Nan, M.; Zhang, X.; Gao, C.; Wang, P. SARS-CoV-2 ORF9b antagonizes type I and III interferons by targeting multiple components of the RIG-I/MDA-5–MAVS, TLR3–TRIF, and cGAS–STING signaling pathways. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 5376–5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Schreiber, G. The Role of Type I Interferons in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 595739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, J.-Y.; Liao, C.-H.; Wang, Q.; Tan, Y.-J.; Luo, R.; Qiu, Y.; Ge, X.-Y. The ORF6, ORF8 and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV-2 inhibit type I interferon signaling pathway. Virus Res. 2020, 286, 198074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sui, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, W.; Wu, P.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Hou, Z.; Tan, G.; Liu, Q. SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein Inhibits Type I Interferon Production Through Ubiquitin-Mediated Degradation of TBK1. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 662989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ricci, D.; Etna, M.; Rizzo, F.; Sandini, S.; Severa, M.; Coccia, E. Innate Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: From Cells to Soluble Mediators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mullins, S.R.; Vasilakos, J.P.; Deschler, K.; Grigsby, I.; Gillis, P.; John, J.; Elder, M.J.; Swales, J.; Timosenko, E.; Cooper, Z.; et al. Intratumoral immunotherapy with TLR7/8 agonist MEDI9197 modulates the tumor microenvironment leading to enhanced activity when combined with other immunotherapies. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Surendran, N.; Simmons, A.; Pichichero, M.E. TLR agonist combinations that stimulate Th type I polarizing responses from human neonates. Innate Immun. 2018, 24, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hennessy, E.J.; Parker, A.E.; O’Neill, L. Targeting Toll-like receptors: Emerging therapeutics? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kayesh, M.E.H.; Kohara, M.; Tsukiyama-Kohara, K. Toll-Like Receptor Response to Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Potential of TLR Agonists as Immunomodulators for Treating Chronic Hepatitis B: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Alderson, M.R.; McGowan, P.; Baldridge, J.R.; Probst, P. TLR4 agonists as immunomodulatory agents. J. Endotoxin Res. 2006, 12, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Baldridge, J.R.; McGowan, P.; Evans, J.T.; Cluff, C.; Mossman, S.; Johnson, D.; Persing, D. Taking a Toll on human disease: Toll-like receptor 4 agonists as vaccine adjuvants and monotherapeutic agents. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2004, 4, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Evans, J.T.; Cluff, C.W.; Johnson, D.A.; Lacy, M.J.; Persing, D.H.; Baldridge, J.R. Enhancement of antigen-specific immunity via the TLR4 ligands MPL™ adjuvant and Ribi.529. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2003, 2, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sánchez-Ramón, S.; Conejero, L.; Netea, M.G.; Sancho, D.; Palomares, Ó.; Subiza, J.L. Trained Immunity-Based Vaccines: A New Paradigm for the Development of Broad-Spectrum Anti-infectious Formulations. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Reed, S.G.; Orr, M.; Fox, C. Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccines. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1597–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Roßmann, L.; Bagola, K.; Stephen, T.; Gerards, A.-L.; Walber, B.; Ullrich, A.; Schülke, S.; Kamp, C.; Spreitzer, I.; Hasan, M.; et al. Distinct single-component adjuvants steer human DC-mediated T-cell polarization via Toll-like receptor signaling toward a potent antiviral immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2103651118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jeong, S.-K.; Heo, Y.-K.; Jeong, J.-H.; Ham, S.-J.; Yum, J.-S.; Ahn, B.-C.; Song, C.-S.; Chun, E.-Y. COVID-19 Subunit Vaccine with a Combination of TLR1/2 and TLR3 Agonists Induces Robust and Protective Immunity. Vaccines 2021, 9, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Proud, P.C.; Tsitoura, D.; Watson, R.J.; Chua, B.Y.; Aram, M.J.; Bewley, K.R.; Cavell, B.E.; Cobb, R.; Dowall, S.; Fotheringham, S.A.; et al. Prophylactic intranasal administration of a TLR2/6 agonist reduces upper respiratory tract viral shedding in a SARS-CoV-2 challenge ferret model. EBioMedicine 2021, 63, 103153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kumar, S.; Kesharwani, S.S.; Kuppast, B.; Rajput, M.; Bakkari, M.A.; Tummala, H. Discovery of inulin acetate as a novel immune-active polymer and vaccine adjuvant: Synthesis, material characterization, and biological evaluation as a toll-like receptor-4 agonist. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 7950–7960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Bakkari, M.A.; Valiveti, C.K.; Kaushik, R.S.; Tummala, H. Toll-like Receptor-4 (TLR4) Agonist-Based Intranasal Nanovaccine Delivery System for Inducing Systemic and Mucosal Immunity. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 2233–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhao, K.; Wang, H.; Wu, C. The immune responses of HLA-A*0201 restricted SARS-CoV S peptide-specific CD8+ T cells are augmented in varying degrees by CpG ODN, PolyI:C and R848. Vaccine 2011, 29, 6670–6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kared, H.; Redd, A.D.; Bloch, E.M.; Bonny, T.S.; Sumatoh, H.R.; Kairi, F.; Carbajo, D.; Abel, B.; Newell, E.W.; Bettinotti, M.P.; et al. SARS-CoV-2–specific CD8+ T cell responses in convalescent COVID-19 individuals. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pan, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.; Zeng, X.; Liu, G.; Tang, Y.; Qian, C.; Wang, X.; Cheng, F.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Moderbacher, C.R.; Ramirez, S.I.; Dan, J.M.; Grifoni, A.; Hastie, K.M.; Weiskopf, D.; Belanger, S.; Abbott, R.K.; Kim, C.; Choi, J.; et al. Antigen-Specific Adaptive Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in Acute COVID-19 and Associations with Age and Disease Severity. Cell 2020, 183, 996–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Arunachalam, P.S.; Walls, A.C.; Golden, N.; Atyeo, C.; Fischinger, S.; Li, C.; Aye, P.; Navarro, M.J.; Lai, L.; Edara, V.V.; et al. Adjuvanting a subunit COVID-19 vaccine to induce protective immunity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021, 594, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Richmond, P.; Hatchuel, L.; Dong, M.; Ma, B.; Hu, B.; Smolenov, I.; Li, P.; Liang, P.; Han, H.H.; Liang, J.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of S-Trimer (SCB-2019), a protein subunit vaccine candidate for COVID-19 in healthy adults: A phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2021, 397, 682–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Angelopoulou, A.; Alexandris, N.; Konstantinou, E.; Mesiakaris, K.; Zanidis, C.; Farsalinos, K.; Poulas, K. Imiquimod-A toll like receptor 7 agonist-Is an ideal option for management of COVID 19. Environ. Res. 2020, 188, 109858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dyavar, S.R.; Singh, R.; Emani, R.; Pawar, G.P.; Chaudhari, V.D.; Podany, A.T.; Avedissian, S.N.; Fletcher, C.V.; Salunke, D.B. Role of toll-like receptor 7/8 pathways in regulation of interferon response and inflammatory mediators during SARS-CoV2 infection and potential therapeutic options. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 141, 111794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Khanmohammadi, S.; Rezaei, N. Role of Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 2735–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 13 02302 g001 550
Figure 1. A simplified signaling of TLR2 and TLR4 response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Induction of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines through TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathway in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been indicated.
Figure 1. A simplified signaling of TLR2 and TLR4 response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Induction of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines through TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathway in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been indicated.
Viruses 13 02302 g001
Table
Table 1. TLR agonists as vaccine adjuvants for enhancing COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
Table 1. TLR agonists as vaccine adjuvants for enhancing COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
VaccineSponsorTLR Agonist AdjuvantTarget TLRClinical Phase of DevelopmentEffects on Host Immunity Clinical Trials. Gov Identifier/Reference
IMP CoVac-1
(SARS-CoV-2-derived multi-peptide vaccine)		University Hospital TuebingenTLR1/2 ligand XS15TLR1/2Phase IResults not published yetNCT04546841
VXA-CoV2-1VaxartdsRNATLR3Phase IResults not published yetNCT04563702
VXA-CoV2-1.1-SVaxartdsRNATLR3Phase IIResults not published yetNCT05067933
SCB-2019 vaccineClover Biopharmaceuticals AUS Pty Ltd.CpG 1018 plus alumTLR9Phase IWell-tolerated in healthy volunteers; elicited T-helper-1-biased CD4+ T-cell responses[112]
SCB-2019 vaccineZhejiang Clover Biopharmaceuticals Inc.CpG 1018 and alhydrogelTLR9Phase IIResults not published yetNCT04954131
SCB-2019 vaccineClover Biopharmaceuticals AUS Pty Ltd.CpG 1018 plus alumTLR9Phase IIIResults not published yetNCT05012787
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kayesh, M.E.H.; Kohara, M.; Tsukiyama-Kohara, K. An Overview of Recent Insights into the Response of TLR to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Potential of TLR Agonists as SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Adjuvants. Viruses 2021, 13, 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112302

AMA Style

Kayesh MEH, Kohara M, Tsukiyama-Kohara K. An Overview of Recent Insights into the Response of TLR to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Potential of TLR Agonists as SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Adjuvants. Viruses. 2021; 13(11):2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kayesh, Mohammad Enamul Hoque, Michinori Kohara, and Kyoko Tsukiyama-Kohara. 2021. "An Overview of Recent Insights into the Response of TLR to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Potential of TLR Agonists as SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Adjuvants" Viruses 13, no. 11: 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop