Next Article in Journal
JCPyV T-Antigen Activation of the Anti-Apoptotic Survivin Promoter—Its Role in the Development of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy
Next Article in Special Issue
Superinfection Exclusion in Mosquitoes and Its Potential as an Arbovirus Control Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
First Phylogenetic Analysis of Malian SARS-CoV-2 Sequences Provides Molecular Insights into the Genomic Diversity of the Sahel Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic, Morphological and Antigenic Relationships between Mesonivirus Isolates from Australian Mosquitoes and Evidence for Their Horizontal Transmission
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/v12111252
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CXCL10 Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Arthritogenic Alphaviruses

by
Tao Lin
1,
Tingting Geng
1,
Andrew G. Harrison
1,
Duomeng Yang
1,
Anthony T. Vella
1,
Erol Fikrig
2 and
Penghua Wang
1,*
1
Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
2
Section of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2020, 12(11), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111252
Submission received: 29 August 2020 / Revised: 28 October 2020 / Accepted: 29 October 2020 / Published: 2 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mosquito-Specific Viruses: Their Role in Nature and Potential Use for Vector Control or Control of Arboviral Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Emerging and re-emerging arthritogenic alphaviruses, such as Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and O’nyong nyong virus, cause acute and chronic crippling arthralgia associated with inflammatory immune responses. Approximately 50% of CHIKV-infected patients suffer from rheumatic manifestations that last 6 months to years. However, the physiological functions of individual immune signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of alphaviral arthritis remain poorly understood. Here, we report that a deficiency in CXCL10, which is a chemoattractant for monocytes/macrophages/T cells, led to the same viremia as wild-type animals, but fewer immune infiltrates and lower viral loads in footpads at the peak of arthritic disease (6–8 days post infection). Macrophages constituted the largest immune cell population in footpads following infection, and were significantly reduced in Cxcl10−/− mice. The viral RNA loads in neutrophils and macrophages were reduced in Cxcl10−/− compared to wild-type mice. In summary, our results demonstrate that CXCL10 signaling promotes the pathogenesis of alphaviral disease and suggest that CXCL10 may be a therapeutic target for mitigating alphaviral arthritis.

1. Introduction

Alphaviruses are a genus of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses within the Togaviridae family. These viruses are mainly transmitted by mosquitoes and pose a public health threat worldwide, particularly in tropical/subtropical regions. Many alphaviruses are arthritogenic, including Chikungunya (CHIKV), O’nyong-nyong (ONNV), and Ross River viruses (RRV), etc. CHIKV is the causative agent of acute and chronic crippling arthralgia that was initially identified in Tanzania in 1952 [1]. Since then, several major epidemics have been recorded on the Indian Ocean islands, India, Southeast Asia, which resulted in over 6 million cases [2]. In late 2013, CHIKV emerged on the Caribbean islands, and has now spread to more than 50 countries across Central and South America, including autochthonous infections in the United States, and caused over 2.5 million infections (Sources: Pan America Health Organization). Approximately 50% of CHIKV-infected patients suffer from rheumatic manifestations that last 6 months to years, with ~5% of the victims having rheumatoid arthritis-like illnesses [3,4].
However, no licensed specific antiviral therapeutics or vaccines are available worldwide. This is partly due to the lack of an in-depth understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of CHIKV in immune-competent animal models. It has become clear that innate immunity, in particular the type I IFN system, is one of the most important early antiviral mechanisms in response to alphaviruses. During the acute phase of infection in humans (~two weeks), CHIKV infects many organs and cell types [2], inducing apoptosis and direct tissue damage [5,6,7]. The acute phase is also characteristic of robust innate immune responses, including high levels of type I IFNs, proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines, and growth factors [5,8,9,10,11,12]. Immune cell infiltration is a hallmark of acute CHIKV infection, primarily including macrophages and monocytes, but also neutrophils, dendritic cells, NK cells, and lymphocytes [2]. In the chronic phase, CHIKV arthritis may progress without active viral replication, typified by an elevated expression of cytokines and immune cell infiltration [2,13]. In particular, the human arthritic disease severity is associated with a high level of serum chemoattractants for monocytes/macrophages/T cells, CXCL10, and CXCL9 [14]. In mice, CHIKV infection leads to a low viremia usually lasting 5–7 days, which is limited by type I IFNs [11,15,16,17] and is subsequently cleared by virus-specific antibody responses [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. When injected directly into a mouse foot pad, CHIKV elicits overt arthritic symptoms, including the first peak of foot swelling characteristic of edema occurring 2–3 days post infection and a second peak at 6–8 days post infection [26], with extensive infiltration of immune cells into the infected feet [27,28,29,30,31].
Various classes of active compounds have been reported to inhibit CHIKV replication; however, the in vivo efficacy and safety of these candidates has not been evaluated in animal models [32]. A live attenuated CHIKV virus vaccine was efficacious in 85% of vaccinated people after one year in a phase II trial, but 8% of vaccinated people reported transient joint pain, representing a potential safety concern and enforcing the need for more research on therapies [33]. At present, there is still a great need for safe and effective prophylactics and therapeutics. Using mouse models of viral infection and innate immunity, here, we report that CXCL10 signaling promotes the pathogenesis of alphaviral disease. Cxcl10−/− mice had the same viremia as wild-type animals, but fewer immune infiltrates and lower viral loads in footpads at the peak of arthritic disease (days 6–8 post infection). Macrophages constituted the largest immune cell population in footpads following infection, and were significantly reduced in Cxcl10−/− mice. The viral RNA loads in neutrophils and macrophages were also reduced in Cxcl10−/− compared to wild-type mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice

All the mice used in this study were purchased and bred in our state-of-the-art animal facility. Wild-type C57BL/6J (JAX Stock #: 000664) and Cxcl10−/− (JAX Stock #: 000687 on C57BL/6J background) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. For each experiment, both sex (both genders)- and age (range of 6–12 weeks)-matched WT/mutant mice were used. Mouse experiments were approved and performed according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Connecticut and Yale University.

2.2. Cells and Viruses

Vero cells (monkey kidney epithelial cells, Cat. # CCL-81) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) medium: DMEM (Corning) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S; Corning, Glendale, Arizona, US). The CHIKV French La Reunion strain LR2006-OPY1 was a kind gift of The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station located in New Haven, CT, USA. The ONNV non-recombinant strain was provided by the World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses (WRCEVA) at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Both viruses were propagated in Vero cells.

2.3. Plaque Forming Assay

The quantification of infectious viral particles in cell culture supernatants/mouse tissue homogenates/mouse sera was performed on a Vero cell monolayer in a 6-well plate, following an established protocol [34]. A series of 10-fold dilutions of viral samples were prepared in DMEM without fetal bovine serum. In a 6-well plate, 500 µL of diluted samples were added to a Vero monolayer. The plate was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 2 h. The inoculum was then removed and replaced with 2 mL of complete DMEM medium with 1% SeaPlaque agarose (Cat# 50100, Lonza, Morristown, NJ, US). The plate was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 3 days, and plaques were visualized by a Neutral Red exclusion assay. Viable cells took up neutral red, while dead cells excluded it and thus formed a circular white spot.

2.4. Mouse Infection and Disease Monitoring

Age- and sex-matched mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the hind footpad with 3 × 105 plaque forming units (PFUs) of CHIKV/ONNV. Mice were then monitored for clinical signs of disease. Footpad swelling was measured using a precision digital caliper. Foot swelling as an indicator of local inflammation was recorded over a period of 8 days after infection. The thickness and width of the perimetatarsal area of the hind feet were measured using a precision metric caliper in a blinded fashion. The foot dimension was calculated as width × thickness, and the results were expressed as the fold increase in the foot dimension after infection compared to before infection (day 0 baseline).

2.5. Histology Studies

Mice were sacrificed and feet were removed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissues were embedded in paraffin and processed to obtain 5 μm sections. Tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Arthritic disease was arbitrarily scored from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the worst, based on the exudation of fibrin and inflammatory cells into the joints, alteration in the thickness of tendons or ligament sheaths, and hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the synovium [35]. Slides were imaged using an Accu-Scope EXI-310 model inverted microscope with Infinity Capture software.

2.6. Treatment with Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Vehicle) and Atorvastatin In Vivo

Atorvastatin was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with dimethyl sulfoxide (vehicle) or atorvastatin (25 mg/kg/day) (Cat#1044516, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) from Day 3 through 8 post CHIKV infection (p.i.) on a daily basis.

2.7. Flow Cytometry and Florescence Activated Cell Sorting

Mice were euthanized, and footpads and ankles were harvested at 0, 2, 4, and 6 days post infection (dpi). The footpads were skinned and put into 4 mL of digestion medium with 20 mg/mL collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US), 5 U/mL dispase (Stemcell, Cambridge, MA, US), and 50 mg/mL DNase I mix (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, US) in complete RPMI1640 medium. The tissues were harvested and incubated in digestion medium on a shaker at 37 °C for 4 h. The mixture was transferred to a 40 μm cell strainer sitting on a collection tube. In total, 5 mL of complete RPMI medium was added to the cell strainer. Using a circular motion, the digested tissues were ground into the medium against the cell strainer to release the maximum number of cells. Cells were then centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and red blood cells were lysed using 0.2% sodium chloride. Cells were washed once in complete RPMI medium, and re-suspended in 10 mL of complete RPMI medium in a 15 mL tube. In total, 10 mL of 35% v/v Percoll/RPMI medium was carefully added to the cell suspension. The tube was spun for 20 min at 1200× g. The pellet was re-suspended and washed with complete RPMI medium once.
The isolated cells were then stained for 30 min at 4 °C with the following antibodies (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, US): APC-Fire 750-anti CD11b (Cat. # 101261); Alexa Flour 700-anti Ly-6G (Cat. # 127621); Brilliant Violet 421-anti CD11c (Cat. # 117343); PerCP-Cy5.5-anti MHC II (Cat. # 107625); PE-anti Tetherin (PCDA1) (Cat. # 12703); Brilliant Violet 510-anti F4/80 (Cat. # 123135); APC-anti CD68 (Cat. # 137007); PE-Dazzle 594-anti CD3 epsilon (Cat. # 100347); Brilliant Violet 711-anti CD4 (Cat. # 100557); Brilliant Violet 570-anti CD8a (Cat. # 100739); FITC-anti CD25 (Cat. # 102005); Zombie UV (Cat. # 423107); PE-Cy7-anti CD45 (Cat. # 103113); and TruStain FcX-anti CD16/32 (Cat. # 101319). After staining and washing, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA and analyzed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS).
Flow cytometry was later performed on a Becton-Dickinson FACS ARIA II, CyAn advanced digital processor (ADP) and analyzed using FlowJo software. Neutrophils were classified as CD11b+ Ly6G+, macrophages were classified as CD11b+ F4/80+, DC cells were classified as CD11c+ MHC II+, and pDC cells were classified as CD11c+ PCDA1+.

2.8. Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR

RNA was isolated from blood samples and footpad tissues using an RNAasy mini-prep kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, US). For paraformaldehyde-fixed and sorted cells, RNA was isolated using the RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, US). Isolated RNA was resuspended in RNAse/DNAse free H2O (Invitrogen) and stored at 4 °C overnight or −80 °C. RT was performed on a Bio-Rad CFX machine using the RNA RT Kit (Takara, Mountain View, CA, US) with a 10 μL total reaction volume per well containing 3 μL of RNA samples. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed with gene-specific primers and SYBR Green. The primers applied for CHIKV were the forward primer (5′-GCGAATTCGGCGCAGCACCAAGGACAACTTCA-3′) and reverse primer (5′-AATGCGGCCGCCTAGCAGCATATTAGGCTAAGCAGG-3′). The primers employed for ONNV were the forward primer (5′-GCAGGGAGGCCAGGACAGT-3)’ and reverse primer (5′-GCCCCTTTTTCYTTGAGCCAGTA-3′). The housekeeping gene control used was beta actin (Actb). The following PCR cycling program was used: 10 min at 95°, and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95° and 1 min at 60 °C. The results were calculated using the -∆∆Ct method.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism software. For viral RNA analysis, immune cell analysis, cytokine and chemokine analysis, and footpad swelling, data were analyzed by the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, two-tailed Student’s t test, or multiple t-tests, depending on the data distribution and number of comparison groups. p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. CXCL10 Signaling Contributes to Alphavirus Pathogenesis

In humans, Chikungunya arthritis severity is associated with a high level of serum chemoattractants for monocytes/macrophages/T cells, referred to as CXCL10 [14]. To investigate the physiological role of CXCL10 in alphavirus pathogenesis, we injected CHIKV directly into the footpads of both wild-type (WT) and Cxcl10 knockout (Cxcl10−/−) mice. The results show that the viremia of Cxcl10−/− mice were comparable to those in WT mice at days 2 and 4 post infection (p.i.) (Figure 1A), suggesting that CXCL10 is dispensable for controlling the systemic dissemination of CHIKV. The viral loads in the infected ankle joints of WT and Cxcl10−/− mice were the same at day 2 p.i. and increased modestly in WT at day 4 p.i., while dropped significantly and rapidly in Cxcl10−/− mice from days 4 through 7 (Figure 1B), suggesting that CXCL10 signaling promotes viral persistence. Intriguingly, histopathological analyses conducted by foot swelling monitoring and H&E staining confirmed a moderate decrease in immune cell numbers in the muscles and joints of Cxcl10−/− compared to WT mice (Figure 1C,D). Consistently, the mRNA expression of Ifnb1 and inflammatory cytokines (Il6, Tnfa) was reduced in Cxcl10−/− joints at day 7 p.i. compared to WT (Figure 1E).
We then used a clinically approved, cholesterol-lowering drug, called atorvastatin, which has recently been demonstrated to effectively inhibit CXCL10 expression in both mice and humans [36,37]. We treated mice with dimethyl sulfoxide (vehicle) or atorvastatin from day 3–8 p.i. [36] during the acute phase of CHIKV infection. Indeed, atorvastatin treatment alleviated CHIKV-induced inflammation and disease (Figure 2), suggesting that CXCL10 could be a potential drug target for treating CHIKV arthritis.
We next investigated whether this phenomenon is applicable to other arthritogenic viruses. Considering this, we chose O’nyong-nyong (ONNV), which, together with CHIKV, is a member of the Semliki Forest antigenic complex of the Alphavirus genus. Consistent with the results from our CHIKV studies, ONNV viremia were not influenced by Cxcl10 deficiency (Figure 3A), while the viral loads in the infected feet were lower in Cxcl10−/− than those in WT mice at day 6 p.i. (Figure 3B). Fold changes in the footpad dimensions and histopathological analyses (arbitrary score) by hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) confirmed a moderate decrease in immune cell infiltration into the muscles and joints of Cxcl10−/− compared to WT mice (Figure 3C,D). These data suggest that CXCL10 signaling promotes alphaviral persistence and immune cell infiltration into mouse feet.

3.2. CXCL10 Signaling Promotes Macrophage Recruitment to Infected Feet

Since CXCL10 is a chemoattractant for monocytes/macrophages, we analyzed the immune infiltrates in the infected feet by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), in order to identify and quantitate individual cell populations. In WT mice, the total number of CD45+ cells increased modestly at day 2 p.i., decreased slightly at day 4 p.i., and then elevated again at day 6 p.i. There was a modest decrease in CD45+ cells in Cxcl10−/− at day 6 p.i. compared to WT (p = 0.06) (Figure 4A). Macrophages were recruited rapidly, as early as day 2 p.i., and were the largest immune population at all censored time points. Intriguingly, these cells were significantly fewer in number in Cxcl10−/− than WT mice at day 6 p.i. (Figure 4B). Neutrophils constituted the second largest immune population and infiltrated into the infected feet similarly between WT and Cxcl10−/− mice in terms of quantities and kinetics (Figure 4C). Compared to those in the uninfected mice (day 0), the numbers of conventional dendritic cells (cDC) were only significantly increased by day 6 p.i. and higher in Cxcl10−/− than WT mice (Figure 4D). Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) were also recruited to the infected feet as early as day 2 p.i. and their numbers were the same in both genotypes (Figure 4E).

3.3. CXCL10 Signaling Promotes Alphavirus Persistence in Infiltrating Neutrophils and Macrophages

The abovementioned data show that macrophages and neutrophils are the primary infiltrating cells in the infected mouse feet, and interestingly, the former has been demonstrated to likely be a source of CHIKV persistence in nonhuman primates [38]. We then examined ONNV RNA loads in each cell population after FACS. We were able to extract RNA from paraformaldehyde-fixed cells using a specialized RNA kit and quantitated viral RNA by qRT-PCR. Among all immune cells, neutrophils contained the highest viral load, which was remarkably reduced in Cxcl10−/− mice (p = 0.05) compared to WT mice (Figure 5). Macrophages had the second highest viral load, which was also decreased in Cxcl10−/− mice. The viral loads in cDC and pDC, though at a much lower level than neutrophils/macrophages, tended to be lower in Cxcl10−/− mice (Figure 5). These data suggest that, during the acute phase of infection, neutrophils and macrophages are likely an important source of alphaviral replication in infected tissues, and CXCL10 signaling promotes alphavirus persistence in infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages in the foot.

4. Discussion

CXCL10 is a chemoattractant for monocytes/macrophages, T cells, NKs, and DCs, and can also promote T cell adhesion to endothelial cells, antitumor activity, and the inhibition of bone marrow colony formation and angiogenesis [39,40,41]. Intriguingly, a high level of serum CXCL10 is associated with severe arthritic disease in humans [14]. CXCL10 is secreted by several cell types, including monocytes, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. Its expression is increased in many kinds of chronic inflammatory arthritis, especially in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is thus plausible that, during CHIKV infection, CXCL10 plays a role in leukocyte homing to inflamed tissues and in the perpetuation of inflammation, and therefore, tissue damage.
Indeed, joint inflammation was alleviated in Cxcl10−/− mice (Figure 1 and Figure 3), and this was accompanied by a significant reduction in macrophages, which constituted the largest immune cell population in joints following infection (Figure 4B) [38,42,43]. These activated macrophages could be a main cellular reservoir for CHIKV persistence during the late stages of infection [38,42] and contribute to sustained inflammation. In addition to recruiting immune cells, CXCL10 signaling could directly stimulate viral replication, for instance, human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) replication in macrophages and lymphocytes [44]. In this study, we unexpectedly observed a reduction in CHIKV/ONNV in Cxcl10−/− compared to WT mouse feet at the late stages (days 4/6 and thereafter, respectively) (Figure 1B and Figure 3B), suggesting a pro-viral role for CXCL10 signaling. However, the absence of CXCL10 did not impact viremia (Figure 1A and Figure 3A), suggesting that CXCL10 signaling is dispensable for systemic viral dissemination. Therefore, a reduction of viral loads in Cxcl10−/− mouse feet could be due to fewer macrophages that are supportive of viral replication in Cxcl10−/− than WT feet [38,42].
Statins are clinically approved, cholesterol-lowering drugs. They may also have an anti-inflammatory feature by potently inhibiting CXCL10. A recent meta-analysis of rheumatoid arthritis disease severity in patients treated with statins or a placebo revealed that statins may be effective in improving rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measured by the disease activity score, tender joint count, and swollen joint count [45]. We also demonstrated that the inhibition of CXCL10 by statins could alleviate CHIKV arthritis (Figure 2). Moreover, statins can directly interfere with viral replication, such as Ebola [46], Zika [47], and influenza [48] virus. Therefore, statins could represent a potential drug for the treatment of CHIKV arthritis. However, statins could also interfere with antiviral immune responses due to their inhibition on STAT1 [49,50], RELA [51], and the NF-κB complex [49,52]. Therefore, clinical treatment regimens, including the dose, frequency, and timing of administration, need to be optimized to minimize side effects.
Intriguingly, the viral RNA loads in macrophages and neutrophils of Cxcl10−/− mouse feet were ~3–6-fold lower than those of WT mice (Figure 5). Macrophages and neutrophils were the predominant immune cell types in mouse feet following alphaviral infection (Figure 4). As such, it is plausible that CXCL10 signaling could directly promote alphaviral replication in macrophages and/or other immune cells. CXCL10 is also a chemoattractant for CD4+ T cells, which, though constituting only a small fraction of immune infiltrates during the second peak of foot swelling, are believed to underlie CHIKV-induced inflammation in mice [16,28,53]. However, CD4+ T cells were recruited to footpads by day 6 following ONNV infection and the numbers of CD4+ T cells in Cxcl10−/− feet were no different than those in WT feet (data not shown).
In summary, our results demonstrate that CXCL10 signaling contributes to alphaviral replication and the pathogenesis of alphavirus-induced arthritis. Future work is required to elucidate how CXCL10 signaling facilitates alphaviral replication.

Author Contributions

T.L. designed and performed the majority of the experimental procedures and data analyses. T.G., D.Y. and A.G.H. contributed to some of the experiments and/or provided technical support. A.T.V. and E.F. helped with data interpretations and writing. P.W. conceived and oversaw the study. T.L. and P.W. wrote the paper and all the authors reviewed and/or modified the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, grant number R01AI132526.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for providing Chikungunya virus. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R01AI132526 awarded to P.W.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Robinson, M.C. An epidemic of virus disease in Southern Province, Tanganyika territory, in 1952–1953. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1955, 49, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Silva, L.A.; Dermody, T.S. Chikungunya virus: Epidemiology, replication, disease mechanisms, and prospective intervention strategies. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weaver, S.C.; Lecuit, M. Chikungunya Virus and the Global Spread of a Mosquito-Borne Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Weaver, S.C.; Lecuit, M. Chikungunya Virus Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 94–95. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sourisseau, M.; Schilte, C.; Casartelli, N.; Trouillet, C.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Rudnicka, D.; Sol-Foulon, N.; Le Roux, K.; Prevost, M.-C.; Fsihi, H.; et al. Characterization of Reemerging Chikungunya Virus. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krejbich-Trotot, P.; Denizot, M.; Hoarau, J.; Jaffar-Bandjee, M.; Das, T.; Gasque, P. Chikungunya virus mobilizes the apoptotic machinery to invade host cell defenses. FASEB J. 2010, 25, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dhanwani, R.; Khan, M.; Alam, S.I.; Rao, P.V.L.; Parida, M. Differential proteome analysis of Chikungunya virus-infected new-born mice tissues reveal implication of stress, inflammatory and apoptotic pathways in disease pathogenesis. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1936–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Teng, T.-S.; Kam, Y.-W.; Lee, B.; Hapuarachchi, H.C.; Wimal, A.; Ng, L.-C.; Ng, L.F.P. A Systematic Meta-analysis of Immune Signatures in Patients with Acute Chikungunya Virus Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 211, 1925–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Silva, M.R.; van der Ende-Metselaar, H.; Mulder, H.L.; Smit, J.M.; Rodenhuis-Zybert, I.A. Mechanism and role of MCP-1 upregulation upon chikungunya virus infection in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, srep32288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Her, Z.; Malleret, B.; Chan, M.; Ong, E.K.S.; Wong, S.-C.; Kwek, D.J.C.; Tolou, H.; Lin, R.T.P.; Tambyah, P.A.; Rénia, L.; et al. Active Infection of Human Blood Monocytes by Chikungunya Virus Triggers an Innate Immune Response. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 5903–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schilte, C.; Couderc, T.; Chretien, F.; Sourisseau, M.; Gangneux, N.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Kraxner, A.; Tschopp, J.; Higgs, S.; Michault, A.; et al. Type I IFN controls chikungunya virus via its action on nonhematopoietic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wauquier, N.; Becquart, P.; Nkoghé, D.; Padilla, C.; Ndjoyi-Mbiguino, A.; Leroy, E.M. The Acute Phase of Chikungunya Virus Infection in Humans Is Associated with Strong Innate Immunity and T CD8 Cell Activation. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 204, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chang, A.Y.; Martins, K.A.O.; Encinales, L.; Reid, S.P.; Acuña, M.; Encinales, C.; Matranga, C.B.; Pacheco, N.; Cure, C.; Shukla, B.; et al. Chikungunya Arthritis Mechanisms in the Americas. Arthr. Rheumatol. 2018, 70, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kelvin, A.A.; Banner, D.; Silvi, G.; Moro, M.L.; Spataro, N.; Gaibani, P.; Cavrini, F.; Pierro, A.; Rossini, G.; Cameron, M.J.; et al. Inflammatory Cytokine Expression Is Associated with Chikungunya Virus Resolution and Symptom Severity. PLoS Neg. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rudd, P.A.; Wilson, J.; Gardner, J.; Larcher, T.; Babarit, C.; Le, T.T.; Anraku, I.; Kumagai, Y.; Loo, Y.-M.; Gale, M.; et al. Interferon Response Factors 3 and 7 Protect against Chikungunya Virus Hemorrhagic Fever and Shock. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 9888–9898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Poo, Y.S.; Rudd, P.A.; Gardner, J.; Wilson, J.A.C.; Larcher, T.; Colle, M.-A.; Le, T.T.; Nakaya, H.I.; Warrilow, D.; Allcock, R.; et al. Multiple Immune Factors Are Involved in Controlling Acute and Chronic Chikungunya Virus Infection. PLoS Neg. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Couderc, T.; Chrétien, F.; Schilte, C.; Disson, O.; Brigitte, M.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Touret, Y.; Barau, G.; Cayet, N.; Schuffenecker, I.; et al. A Mouse Model for Chikungunya: Young Age and Inefficient Type-I Interferon Signaling Are Risk Factors for Severe Disease. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akahata, W.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Andersen, H.; Sun, S.; Holdaway, H.A.; Kong, W.-P.; Lewis, M.G.; Higgs, S.; Rossmann, M.G.; Rao, S.; et al. A virus-like particle vaccine for epidemic Chikungunya virus protects nonhuman primates against infection. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fric, J.; Bertin-Maghit, S.; Wang, C.-I.; Nardin, A.; Warter, L. Use of Human Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Chikungunya Virus Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 207, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prow, T.W.; Chen, X.; Prow, N.A.; Fernando, G.J.P.; Tan, C.S.E.; Raphael, A.P.; Chang, D.; Ruutu, M.P.; Jenkins, D.W.K.; Pyke, A.; et al. Nanopatch-Targeted Skin Vaccination against West Nile Virus and Chikungunya Virus in Mice. Small 2010, 6, 1776–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, D.; Suhrbier, A.; Penn-Nicholson, A.; Woraratanadharm, J.; Gardner, J.; Luo, M.; Le, T.T.; Anraku, I.; Sakalian, M.; Einfeld, D.; et al. A complex adenovirus vaccine against chikungunya virus provides complete protection against viraemia and arthritis. Vaccine 2011, 29, 2803–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Goh, L.Y.; Hobson-Peters, J.; Prow, N.A.; Gardner, J.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H.; Pyke, A.T.; Suhrbier, A.; Suhrbier, A. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to the E2 protein of chikungunya virus protects against disease in a mouse model. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 149, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Metz, S.W.; Gardner, J.; Geertsema, C.; Le, T.T.; Goh, L.; Vlak, J.M.; Suhrbier, A.; Pijlman, G.P. Effective Chikungunya Virus-like Particle Vaccine Produced in Insect Cells. PLoS Neg. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Selvarajah, S.; Sexton, N.R.; Kahle, K.M.; Fong, R.H.; Mattia, K.-A.; Gardner, J.; Lu, K.; Liss, N.M.; Salvador, B.; Tucker, D.F.; et al. A Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Acid-Sensitive Region in Chikungunya Virus E2 Protects from Disease. PLoS Neg. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pal, P.; Dowd, K.A.; Brien, J.D.; Edeling, M.A.; Gorlatov, S.; Johnson, S.; Lee, I.; Akahata, W.; Nabel, G.J.; Richter, M.K.S.; et al. Development of a Highly Protective Combination Monoclonal Antibody Therapy against Chikungunya Virus. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fox, J.M.; Diamond, M.S. Immune-Mediated Protection and Pathogenesis of Chikungunya Virus. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 4210–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Teo, T.-H.; Lum, F.-M.; Lee, W.W.L.; Ng, L.F.P. Mouse models for Chikungunya virus: Deciphering immune mechanisms responsible for disease and pathology. Immunol. Res. 2012, 53, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Teo, T.-H.; Lum, F.-M.; Claser, C.; Lulla, V.; Lulla, A.; Merits, A.; Rénia, L.; Hong, J.-S.; Ng, L.F.P.; Liao, J.; et al. A Pathogenic Role for CD4+T Cells during Chikungunya Virus Infection in Mice. J. Immunol. 2012, 190, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gasque, P.; Couderc, T.; Lecuit, M.; Roques, P.; Ng, L.F. Chikungunya Virus Pathogenesis and Immunity. Vect. Borne Zoon. Dis. 2015, 15, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Petitdemange, C.; Becquart, P.; Wauquier, N.; Béziat, V.; Debré, P.; Leroy, E.M.; Vieillard, V. Unconventional Repertoire Profile Is Imprinted during Acute Chikungunya Infection for Natural Killer Cells Polarization toward Cytotoxicity. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stoermer, K.A.; Burrack, A.; Oko, L.; Montgomery, S.A.; Borst, L.B.; Gill, R.G.; Morrison, T.E. Genetic Ablation of Arginase 1 in Macrophages and Neutrophils Enhances Clearance of an Arthritogenic Alphavirus. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 4047–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Abdelnabi, R.; Neyts, J.; Delang, L. Towards antivirals against chikungunya virus. Antivir. Res. 2015, 121, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rezza, G. Do we need a vaccine against chikungunya? Pathog. Glob. Health 2015, 109, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, P. Exploration of West Nile Virus Infection in Mouse Models. Adv. Struct. Safety Stud. 2016, 1435, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pal, U.; Wang, P.; Bao, F.; Yang, X.; Samanta, S.; Schoen, R.; Wormser, G.P.; Schwartz, I.; Fikrig, E. Borrelia burgdorferi basic membrane proteins A and B participate in the genesis of Lyme arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 205, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wilson, N.O.; Solomon, W.; Anderson, L.; Patrickson, J.; Pitts, S.; Bond, V.; Liu, M.; Stiles, J.K. Pharmacologic Inhibition of CXCL10 in Combination with Anti-malarial Therapy Eliminates Mortality Associated with Murine Model of Cerebral Malaria. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Grip, O.; Janciauskiene, S. Atorvastatin Reduces Plasma Levels of Chemokine (CXCL10) in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Labadie, K.; Larcher, T.; Joubert, C.; Mannioui, A.; Delache, B.; Brochard, P.; Guigand, L.; Dubreil, L.; Lebon, P.; Verrier, B.; et al. Chikungunya disease in nonhuman primates involves long-term viral persistence in macrophages. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Angiolillo, A.L.; Sgadari, C.; Taub, D.D.; Liao, F.; Farber, J.M.; Maheshwari, S.; Kleinman, H.K.; Reaman, G.H.; Tosato, G. Human interferon-inducible protein 10 is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 182, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dufour, J.H.; Dziejman, M.; Liu, M.T.; Leung, J.H.; Lane, T.E.; Luster, A.D. IFN-γ-Inducible Protein 10 (IP-10; CXCL10)-Deficient Mice Reveal a Role for IP-10 in Effector T Cell Generation and Trafficking. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 3195–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Petrovic-Djergovic, D.; Popovic, M.; Chittiprol, S.; Cortado, H.; Ransom, R.F.; Partida-Sánchez, S. CXCL10 induces the recruitment of monocyte-derived macrophages into kidney, which aggravate puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 180, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hoarau, J.-J.; Bandjee, M.-C.J.; Trotot, P.K.; Das, T.; Li-Pat-Yuen, G.; Dassa, B.; Denizot, M.; Guichard, E.; Ribera, A.; Henni, T.; et al. Persistent Chronic Inflammation and Infection by Chikungunya Arthritogenic Alphavirus in Spite of a Robust Host Immune Response. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 5914–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gardner, J.; Anraku, I.; Le, T.T.; Larcher, T.; Major, L.; Roques, P.; Schroder, W.A.; Higgs, S.; Suhrbier, A. Chikungunya Virus Arthritis in Adult Wild-Type Mice. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8021–8032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lane, B.R.; King, S.R.; Bock, P.J.; Strieter, R.M.; Coffey, M.J.; Markovitz, D.M. The C-X-C chemokine IP-10 stimulates HIV-1 replication. Virology 2003, 307, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xing, B.; Yin, Y.-F.; Zhao, L.-D.; Wang, L.; Zheng, W.-J.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q.-J.; Tang, F.-L.; Zhang, F.-C.; Shan, G.; et al. Effect of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitor on Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Medicine 2015, 94, e572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shrivastava-Ranjan, P.; Flint, M.; Bergeron, E.; McElroy, A.; Chatterjee, P.; Albariño, C.G.; Nichol, S.T.; Spiropoulou, C.F. Statins Suppress Ebola Virus Infectivity by Interfering with Glycoprotein Processing. mBio 2018, 9, e00660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Españo, E.; Nam, J.-H.; Song, E.-J.; Song, D.; Lee, C.-K.; Kim, J.-K. Lipophilic statins inhibit Zika virus production in Vero cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Episcopio, D.; Aminov, S.; Benjamin, S.; Germain, G.; Datan, E.; Landazuri, J.; Lockshin, R.A.; Zakeri, Z. Atorvastatin restricts the ability of influenza virus to generate lipid droplets and severely suppresses the replication of the virus. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 9516–9525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wagner, A.H.; Schwabe, O.; Hecker, M. Atorvastatin inhibition of cytokine-inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in native endothelial cells in situ. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 136, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wickert, L.E.; Karta, M.R.; Audhya, A.; Gern, J.E.; Bertics, P.J. Simvastatin attenuates rhinovirus-induced interferon and CXCL10 secretion from monocytic cells in vitro. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2014, 95, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moreno, M.; Ramalho, L.N.; Sancho-Bru, P.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.; Ramalho, F.; Abraldes, J.G.; Colmenero, J.; Dominguez, M.; Egido, J.; Arroyo, V.; et al. Atorvastatin attenuates angiotensin II-induced inflammatory actions in the liver. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2009, 296, G147–G156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, D.; Chen, H.; Romeo, F.; Sawamura, T.; Saldeen, T.; Mehta, J.L. Statins Modulate Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein-Mediated Adhesion Molecule Expression in Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells: Role of LOX-1. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 302, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Teo, T.-H.; Chan, Y.-H.; Lee, W.W.L.; Lum, F.-M.; Amrun, S.N.; Her, Z.; Rajarethinam, R.; Merits, A.; Rötzschke, O.; Renia, L.; et al. Fingolimod treatment abrogates chikungunya virus–induced arthralgia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaal1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 12 01252 g001
Figure 1. CXCL10 signaling facilitates Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) pathogenesis in mouse feet. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 (wild-type (WT)) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with CHIKV. (A) Quantification of viremia by qPCR in whole blood cells (left panel) and a plaque assay (PFU/mL serum) (right panel) of WT and Cxcl10−/− mice. (B) Quantification of viral loads by qPCR (left panel) and a plaque forming assay (PFU/g tissue, day 7) at various days after infection. (C) Fold changes in the footpad dimensions of CHIKV-infected mice (Days 2, 4, 6, and 8) in comparison to the uninfected mice (Day 0) (n = 8 per genotype). Error bar: mean ± s.e.m. *, p < 0.05, non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. (D) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) micrographs and arbitrary scores of ankle joint inflammation and damage using a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing the worst disease at 7 days after CHIKV infection. N = 5–6/genotype. Magnifications 40×. B: bone, T: tendon, and M: muscle. Boxed areas indicate the regions with infiltration and tissue damage. Magnification: 200×. (E) qPCR quantification of cytokines in ankle joints at day 8 post infection (p.i.). Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 ((non-parametric Mann–Whitney test for (B,D) and two-tailed Student’s t-test for (E)).
Figure 1. CXCL10 signaling facilitates Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) pathogenesis in mouse feet. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 (wild-type (WT)) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with CHIKV. (A) Quantification of viremia by qPCR in whole blood cells (left panel) and a plaque assay (PFU/mL serum) (right panel) of WT and Cxcl10−/− mice. (B) Quantification of viral loads by qPCR (left panel) and a plaque forming assay (PFU/g tissue, day 7) at various days after infection. (C) Fold changes in the footpad dimensions of CHIKV-infected mice (Days 2, 4, 6, and 8) in comparison to the uninfected mice (Day 0) (n = 8 per genotype). Error bar: mean ± s.e.m. *, p < 0.05, non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. (D) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) micrographs and arbitrary scores of ankle joint inflammation and damage using a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing the worst disease at 7 days after CHIKV infection. N = 5–6/genotype. Magnifications 40×. B: bone, T: tendon, and M: muscle. Boxed areas indicate the regions with infiltration and tissue damage. Magnification: 200×. (E) qPCR quantification of cytokines in ankle joints at day 8 post infection (p.i.). Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 ((non-parametric Mann–Whitney test for (B,D) and two-tailed Student’s t-test for (E)).
Viruses 12 01252 g001
Viruses 12 01252 g002
Figure 2. Atorvastain suppresses CHIKV arthritis. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with dimethyl sulfoxide (vehicle) or atorvastatin (25 mg/kg/day) from Day 3 through 8 post CHIKV infection (p.i.) on a daily basis. (A) Fold changes in the footpad dimensions of infected mice (Days 3, 6, and 8) in comparison to the uninfected mice (Day 0) (n = 8 for vehicle and 10 for atorvastatin). Error bar: mean ± s.e.m. (B) Representative H&E micrographs (100×) and (C) arbitrary score of H&E on Day 8 p.i. The horizontal line in (C) is the median of the results. * p < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test for (A,C). Each symbol represents one mouse.
Figure 2. Atorvastain suppresses CHIKV arthritis. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with dimethyl sulfoxide (vehicle) or atorvastatin (25 mg/kg/day) from Day 3 through 8 post CHIKV infection (p.i.) on a daily basis. (A) Fold changes in the footpad dimensions of infected mice (Days 3, 6, and 8) in comparison to the uninfected mice (Day 0) (n = 8 for vehicle and 10 for atorvastatin). Error bar: mean ± s.e.m. (B) Representative H&E micrographs (100×) and (C) arbitrary score of H&E on Day 8 p.i. The horizontal line in (C) is the median of the results. * p < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test for (A,C). Each symbol represents one mouse.
Viruses 12 01252 g002
Viruses 12 01252 g003
Figure 3. CXCL10 signaling facilitates O’nyong-nyong virus (ONNV_ pathogenesis in mouse feet. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 (WT) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with ONNV. (A) qPCR quantification of ONNV loads in (A) whole blood cells and (B) the footpads at various days after infection. (C) Fold changes in the footpad dimensions of ONNV-infected mice (Days 2, 4, 5, and 6) in comparison to the uninfected mice (Day 0) (n = 7 per genotype). Error bar: mean ± s.e.m. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test. (D) Arbitrary scores of ankle joint inflammation and damage using a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing the worst disease at 6 days after ONNV infection. N = 6/genotype. Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. * p < 0.05 (non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for (B,D)).
Figure 3. CXCL10 signaling facilitates O’nyong-nyong virus (ONNV_ pathogenesis in mouse feet. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 (WT) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with ONNV. (A) qPCR quantification of ONNV loads in (A) whole blood cells and (B) the footpads at various days after infection. (C) Fold changes in the footpad dimensions of ONNV-infected mice (Days 2, 4, 5, and 6) in comparison to the uninfected mice (Day 0) (n = 7 per genotype). Error bar: mean ± s.e.m. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test. (D) Arbitrary scores of ankle joint inflammation and damage using a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing the worst disease at 6 days after ONNV infection. N = 6/genotype. Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. * p < 0.05 (non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for (B,D)).
Viruses 12 01252 g003
Viruses 12 01252 g004
Figure 4. CXCL10 signaling facilitates macrophage infiltration into mouse feet. Age- and sex-matchedC57BL/6 (WT) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with ONNV. Different immune cells were quantitated by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). The frequencies of (A) the total number of CD45+ immune cells, (B) CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages, (C) CD11b+ Ly-6G+ neutrophils, (D) CD11c+ MHCII+ conventional dendritic cells (cDC), and (E) CD11c+ PCDA1+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC). Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. * p < 0.05 (non-parametric Mann-Whitney t test).
Figure 4. CXCL10 signaling facilitates macrophage infiltration into mouse feet. Age- and sex-matchedC57BL/6 (WT) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with ONNV. Different immune cells were quantitated by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). The frequencies of (A) the total number of CD45+ immune cells, (B) CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages, (C) CD11b+ Ly-6G+ neutrophils, (D) CD11c+ MHCII+ conventional dendritic cells (cDC), and (E) CD11c+ PCDA1+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC). Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. * p < 0.05 (non-parametric Mann-Whitney t test).
Viruses 12 01252 g004
Viruses 12 01252 g005
Figure 5. Viral RNA loads are reduced in Cxcl10−/− macrophages and neutrophils. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 (WT) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with ONNV. Immune cells were sorted by FACS. ONNV RNA in the sorted immune cells was quantitated by RT-PCR. Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. p values were calculated with the Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 5. Viral RNA loads are reduced in Cxcl10−/− macrophages and neutrophils. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 (WT) and Cxcl10-deficient (Cxcl10−/−) mice were infected with ONNV. Immune cells were sorted by FACS. ONNV RNA in the sorted immune cells was quantitated by RT-PCR. Each dot = one mouse. The horizontal line in each column = the median. p values were calculated with the Mann-Whitney test.
Viruses 12 01252 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, T.; Geng, T.; Harrison, A.G.; Yang, D.; Vella, A.T.; Fikrig, E.; Wang, P. CXCL10 Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Arthritogenic Alphaviruses. Viruses 2020, 12, 1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111252

AMA Style

Lin T, Geng T, Harrison AG, Yang D, Vella AT, Fikrig E, Wang P. CXCL10 Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Arthritogenic Alphaviruses. Viruses. 2020; 12(11):1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Tao, Tingting Geng, Andrew G. Harrison, Duomeng Yang, Anthony T. Vella, Erol Fikrig, and Penghua Wang. 2020. "CXCL10 Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Arthritogenic Alphaviruses" Viruses 12, no. 11: 1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111252

APA Style

Lin, T., Geng, T., Harrison, A. G., Yang, D., Vella, A. T., Fikrig, E., & Wang, P. (2020). CXCL10 Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Arthritogenic Alphaviruses. Viruses, 12(11), 1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111252

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop