Next Article in Journal
High Morphological Differentiation in Crown Architecture Contrasts with Low Population Genetic Structure of German Norway Spruce Stands
Next Article in Special Issue
Spiders in the Web: Understanding the Evolution of REDD+ in Southwest Ghana
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Stand Structure and Number of Sample Trees on Optimal Management for Scots Pine: A Model-Based Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
REDD+ as a Public Policy Dilemma: Understanding Conflict and Cooperation in the Design of Conservation Incentives
Open AccessArticle

“Embodied Deforestation” as a New EU Policy Debate to Tackle Tropical Forest Loss: Assessing Implications for REDD+ Performance

1
Wildlife Conservation Society, 1040 Brussels, Belgium
2
Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2018, 9(12), 751; https://doi.org/10.3390/f9120751
Received: 12 September 2018 / Revised: 23 October 2018 / Accepted: 27 November 2018 / Published: 1 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Performance of REDD+: From Global Governance to Local Practices)
The need to tackle international drivers of deforestation has long been acknowledged; but remains little addressed via policy measures. In the European Union (EU), a new policy debate is emerging around the concept of “embodied deforestation”, which targets EU agricultural commodity imports as drivers of deforestation. The notion views deforestation as an externality generated by EU imports associated with tropical deforestation. Our article examines whether this concept represents a shift in tackling international-level drivers of tropical deforestation within EU policy. We also examine, from a networked governance perspective, whether this new debate fuels further fragmentation or rather a move towards a more integrated approach to combating tropical forest loss within EU policy, and what the implications are for other initiatives, such as the climate change related “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation” (REDD+). Our analysis draws on an extensive analysis of EU policy documents and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and EU decision-makers. We find that, despite growing debate around the concept of embodied deforestation, policy measures necessary to reduce the impact of EU consumption of agricultural commodities associated with tropical deforestation have not yet been developed. We conclude that “embodied deforestation” remains more an idea than reality within EU policy to date, with the burden of responsibility for addressing international deforestation drivers still largely remaining on developing countries. There is still potential, however, for this debate to lead to a more integrated approach to tackling tropical deforestation within EU policy, if it comes to be seen, together with REDD+, as one of a number of linked approaches to EU efforts to combat deforestation. View Full-Text
Keywords: REDD+; European Union; forest policy; deforestation drivers; tropical forests REDD+; European Union; forest policy; deforestation drivers; tropical forests
MDPI and ACS Style

Weatherley-Singh, J.; Gupta, A. “Embodied Deforestation” as a New EU Policy Debate to Tackle Tropical Forest Loss: Assessing Implications for REDD+ Performance. Forests 2018, 9, 751.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop