Drought Stress Response of Norway Spruce Seedlings Treated with Drought-Mitigative Additives
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
- (i)
- Full watering (FW), maintaining the substrate volumetric water content at 70%.
- (ii)
- Reduced watering (RW), with the water content held at 40%.
- (iii)
- Periodic watering (PW), the substrate was rehydrated to 70% once the moisture dropped to the wilting threshold (21%).
- (iv)
- No watering (NW).
2.2. Growing of Seedlings
2.3. Substrate and Additives
2.4. Watering Treatments
2.5. Sampling and Measurements
2.6. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Survival
3.2. Growth
3.3. Short Roots and Ectomycorrhizas
3.4. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence
4. Discussion
4.1. Soil Water Availability and Seedling Performance
4.2. Effects of Hydrogel
4.3. Effects of Ectomycorrhizal Inoculation
4.4. Soil Water Availability and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence
4.5. Pot Versus Field Experimental Conditions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brus, D.J.; Hengeveld, G.M.; Walvoort, D.J.J.; Goedhart, P.W.; Heidema, A.H.; Nabuurs, G.J.; Gunia, K. Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Euforgen. Distribution Map of Norway Spruce (Picea abies). Available online: http://www.euforgen.org (accessed on 10 November 2025).
- Slodičák, M.; Novák, J.; Dušek, D. Management of Norway spruce stands in the Western Carpathians. In The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability; Kozak, J., Ostapowicz, K., Bytnerowicz, A., Wyżga, B., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 2013; pp. 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potterf, M.; Svitok, M.; Mezei, P.; Jarčuška, B.; Jakuš, R.; Blaženec, M.; Hlásny, T. Contrasting Norway spruce disturbance dynamics in managed forests and strict forest reserves in Slovakia. Forestry 2023, 96, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konôpka, B.; Zach, P.; Kulfan, J. Wind—An important ecological factor and destructive agent in forests. Cent. Eur. For. J. 2016, 62, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parobeková, Z.; Sedmáková, D.; Kucbel, S.; Pittner, J.; Jaloviar, P.; Saniga, M.; Balanda, M.; Vencurik, J. Influence of disturbances and climate on high-mountain Norway spruce forests in the Low Tatra Mts. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 380, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezei, P.; Jakuš, R.; Pennerstorfer, J.; Havašová, M.; Škvarenina, J.; Ferenčík, J.; Slivinský, J.; Bičárová, S.; Bilčík, D.; Blaženec, M.; et al. Storms, temperature maxima and the Eurasian spruce bark beetle Ips typographus—An infernal trio in Norway spruce forests of the Central European High Tatra Mountains. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 242, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bošeľa, M.; Tumajer, J.; Cienciala, E.; Dobor, L.; Kulla, L.; Marčiš, P.; Popa, I.; Sedmák, R.; Sedmáková, D.; Sitko, R.; et al. Climate warming induced synchronous growth decline in Norway spruce populations across biogeographical gradients since 2000. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 141794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repáč, I.; Belko, M.; Krajmerová, D.; Paule, L. Planting time, stocktype and additive effects on the development of spruce and pine plantations in Western Carpathian Mts. New For. 2021, 52, 449–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauer, O.; Rozmánek, M.; Houšková, K. Drought spells and their impact on the growth of young plantations established with the containerized planting stock. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2018, 66, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mataruga, M.; Cvjetković, B.; De Cuyper, B.; Aneva, I.; Zhelev, P.; Cudlín, P.; Metslaid, M.; Kankaanhuhta, V.; Collet, C.; Anhöfer, P.; et al. Monitoring and control of forest seedling quality in Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 546, 121308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gera, M.; Damborská, I.; Lapin, M.; Melo, M. Climate changes in Slovakia: Analysis of past and present observations and scenarios of future developments. In Water Resources in Slovakia: Part II Climate Change, Drought and Floods; Negm, A., Zeleňáková, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 21–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starkey, T.E.; Enebak, S.A.; South, D.B.; Cross, R.E. Particle size and composition of polymer root gels affect loblolly pine seedling survival. Nativ. Plants J. 2012, 13, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biehl, J.; Sandén, H.; Rewald, B. Contrasting effects of two hydrogels on biomass allocation, needle loss, and root growth of Picea abies seedlings under drought. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 538, 120970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šijačić-Nikolić, M.; Vilotić, D.; Milovanović, J. Effect of polymers on Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.) and Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) seedling development in afforestation. Glob. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2011, 1, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
- Jamnická, G.; Ditmarová, Ľ.; Kmet’, J.; Pšidová, E.; Macková, M.; Gömöry, D.; Střelcová, K. The soil hydrogel improved photosynthetic performance of beech seedlings treated under drought. Plant Soil Environ. 2013, 59, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orikiriza, L.J.B.; Agaba, H.; Eilu, G.; Kabasa, D.J.; Worbes, M.; Hüttermann, A. Effects of hydrogels on tree seedling performance in temperate soils before and after water stress. J. Environ. Prot. 2013, 4, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowe, E.C.; Williamson, J.C.; Jones, D.L.; Holliman, P.; Healey, J.R. Initial tree establishment on blocky quarry waste ameliorated with hydrogel or slate processing fines. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34, 994–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apostol, K.G.; Jacobs, D.F.; Dumroese, R.K. Root desiccation and drought stress responses of bareroot Quercus rubra seedlings treated with a hydrophilic polymer root dip. Plant Soil 2009, 315, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarvaš, M.; Pavlenda, P.; Takáčová, E. Effect of hydrogel application on survival and growth of pine seedlings in reclamations. J. For. Sci. 2007, 53, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.; Read, D. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2008; pp. 191–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Courty, P.E.; Buee, M.; Diedhiou, A.G.; Frey-Klett, P.; Le Tacon, F.; Rineau, F.; Turpault, M.P.; Uroz, S.; Garbaye, J. The role of ectomycorrhizal communities in forest ecosystem processes: New perspectives and emerging concepts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 679–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleksandrowicz-Trzcińska, M.; Hamera-Dzierzanowska, A.; Zybura, H.; Drozdowski, S. Effect of mycorrhization and chitosan on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in nursery and plantation. Sylwan 2013, 157, 899–908, (In Polish with English summary). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repáč, I.; Parobeková, Z.; Belko, M. Ectomycorrhiza-hydrogel additive enhanced growth of Norway spruce seedlings in a nutrient-poor peat substrate. J. For. Sci. 2022, 68, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbaye, J.; Churin, J.L. Growth stimulation of young oak plantations inoculated with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus with special reference to summer drought. For. Ecol. Manag. 1997, 98, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, J.B.; Jones, D.M.; Kranabetter, M.J. Ectomycorrhizae and tree seedling nitrogen nutrition in forest restoration. New For. 2015, 46, 747–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karličić, V.; Ćurguz, G.V.; Raičević, V. The alleviation of reforestation challenges by beneficial soil microorganisms. Reforesta 2016, 1, 238–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kipfer, T.; Wohlgemuth, T.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Ghazoul, J.; Egli, S. Growth response of drought-stressed Pinus sylvestris seedlings to single- and multi-species inoculation with ectomycorrhizal fungi. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Himanen, K.; Nygren, M.; Pennanen, T. Mycelial inoculation of containerized Norway spruce seedlings with ectomycorrhizal fungi. New For. 2024, 55, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schall, P.; Lödige, C.; Beck, M.; Ammer, C. Biomass allocation to roots and shoots is more sensitive to shade and drought in European beech than in Norway spruce seedlings. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 266, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matisons, R.; Krisans, O.; Jansons, A.; Kondratovics, T.; Elferts, D.; Ievinsh, G. Norway spruce seedlings from an eastern baltic provenance show tolerance to simulated drought. Forests 2021, 12, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Húdoková, H.; Fleischer, P.; Jezik, M.; Maresová, J.; Psidova, E.; Mukarram, M.; Ditmarova, L.; Sliacka-Konopkova, A.; Jamnická, G. Can seedlings of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. H. Karst.) populations withstand changed climate conditions? Photosynthetica 2023, 61, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.X.; Zhang, H.Q.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.Q.; Tang, M. Effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Suillus variegatus) on the growth, hydraulic function, and non-structural carbohydrates of Pinus tabulaeformis under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repáč, I.; Belko, M.; Krajmerová, D.; Kmeť, J.; Pavlík, M. Induced drought stress response of European beech seedlings treated with hydrogel and ectomycorrhizal inoculum. Forests 2023, 14, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moser, B.; Kipfer, T.; Richter, S.; Egli, S.; Wohlgemuth, T. Drought resistance of Pinus sylvestris seedlings conferred by plastic root architecture rather than ectomycorrhizal colonisation. Ann. For. Sci. 2015, 72, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrak, T.; Kraigher, H. Effects of drought on tree fine roots and ectomycorrhiza in forest ecosystems. Acta Silvae Ligni 2019, 120, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Möttönen, M.; Lehto, T.; Rita, H.; Aphalo, P. Recovery of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings from repeated drought as affected by boron nutrition. Trees 2005, 19, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeBoodt, M.; Verdonck, O.; Cappaert, I. Method for measuring water release curve of organic substrates. Acta Hortic. 1974, 37, 2054–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, M.; O’Shea, J. Relative breakdown of peat and non-peat growing media. Acta Hortic. 1999, 481, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cocozza, C.; Miguel, M.; Pšidová, E.; Ditmarová, Ľ.; Marino, S.; Maiuro, L.; Alvino, A.; Czajkowski, T.; Bolte, A.; Tognetti, R. Variation in ecophysiological traits and drought tolerance of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings from different populations. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaario, L.M.; Tervonen, A.; Haukioja, K.; Haukioja, M.; Pennanen, T.; Timonen, S. The effect of nursery substrate and fertilization on the growth and ectomycorrhizal status of containerized and outplanted seedlings of Picea abies. Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DEEMY—An Information System for Characterization and Determination of Ectomycorrhizae. Available online: http://www.deemy.de (accessed on 20 November 2025).
- Ditmarová, L.; Kurjak, D.; Palmroth, S.; Kmet, J.; Strelcová, K. Physiological responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings to drought stress. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingleby, K.; Mason, P.A.; Last, F.T.; Fleming, L.V. Identification of Ectomycorrhizas; ITE Research Publication No. 5; HMSO: London, UK, 1990; pp. 83–86. Available online: https://books.google.sk/books/about/Identification_of_Ectomycorrhizas.html?id=c2wOAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Rudawska, M.; Leski, T.; Trocha, L.K.; Gornowicz, R. Ectomycorrhizal status of Norway spruce seedlings from bare-root forest nurseries. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 236, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hájíčková, M.; Plichta, R.; Urban, J.; Volarik, D.; Gebauer, R. Low resistance but high resilience to drought of flushing Norway spruce seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2021, 41, 1848–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengough, A.G.; Bransby, M.F.; Hans, J.; McKenna, S.J.; Roberts, T.J.; Valentine, T.A. Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomášková, I.; Resnerová, K.; Trombik, J.; Bláha, J.; Pastierovič, F.; Macků, J. Potential of hydrogel treatment in forest regeneration: Impact on growth and vitality of Central European tree species. Front. For. Glob. Change 2023, 6, 1251041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehto, T.; Zwiazek, J.J. Ectomycorrhizas and water relations of trees: A review. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rudawska, M.L.; Kieliszewska-Rokicka, B. Mycorrhizal formation by Paxillus involutus strains in relation to their IAA-synthesizing activity. New Phytol. 1997, 137, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holuša, J.; Pešková, V.; Vostrá, L.; Pernek, M. Impact of mycorrhizal inoculation on spruce seedling: Comparisons of a 5-year experiment in forests infested by honey fungus. Period. Biol. 2009, 111, 413–417. [Google Scholar]
- Lorenc, F.; Lubojacký, J.; Tonka, T. Influence of mycorrhizal preparation and fertilizer on growth and honey fungus infestation of Norway spruce seedlings. Zprávy Lesn. Výzk. Rep. For. Res. 2023, 68, 107–115, (In Czech with English summary). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hrivnák, M.; Krajmerová, D.; Kurjak, D.; Konopkova, A.; Magni, F.; Scaglione, D.; Ditmarova, L.; Jamnicka, G.; Maresova, J.; Gömöry, D. Differential associations between nucleotide polymorphisms and physiological traits in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) plants under contrasting water regimes. Forestry 2022, 95, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slugeňová, K.; Ditmarová, Ľ.; Kurjak, D.; Váľka, J. Drought and aluminium as stress factors in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) seedlings. J. For. Sci. 2011, 57, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawaletz, H.; Mölder, I.; Annighöfer, P.; Terwei, A.; Zerbe, S.; Ammer, C. Pot experiments with woody species—A review. Forestry 2014, 87, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poorter, H.; Bühler, J.; van Dusschoten, D.; Climent, J.; Postma, J.A. Pot size matters: A meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunz, J.; Räder, A.; Bauhus, J. Effects of drought and rewetting on growth and gas exchange of minor European broadleaved tree species. Forests 2016, 7, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Variable | Watering | Additive | Watering × Additive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | F | p | |
| Stem height | 12.47 | 0.006 | 0.55 | 0.612 | 1.12 | 0.410 |
| Root collar diameter | 83.82 | 0.001 | 35.56 | 0.030 | 1.30 | 0.335 |
| Root dry weight | 74.47 | 0.001 | 3.04 | 0.157 | 0.49 | 0.802 |
| Shoot dry weight | 92.87 | 0.001 | 4.62 | 0.091 | 0.38 | 0.877 |
| Total dry weight | 417.81 | 0.001 | 3.90 | 0.115 | 0.39 | 0.875 |
| Root-to-shoot ratio | 47.08 | 0.001 | 0.62 | 0.584 | 0.41 | 0.854 |
| Short root frequency | 19.53 | 0.002 | 0.72 | 0.538 | 0.97 | 0.490 |
| EMF colonization | 156.25 | 0.001 | 22.75 | 0.006 | 2.20 | 0.121 |
| F0 | 0.57 | 0.606 | 1.27 | 0.374 | 0.97 | 0.476 |
| Fm | 6.35 | 0.047 | 2.61 | 0.187 | 1.02 | 0.451 |
| Fv | 9.69 | 0.029 | 2.99 | 0.160 | 0.97 | 0.472 |
| Fv/Fm | 22.12 | 0.007 | 4.63 | 0.091 | 0.34 | 0.841 |
| Treatment | Stem Height (cm) | Root Collar Diameter (mm) | Root Dry Weight (g) | Shoot Dry Weight (g) | Total Dry Weight (g) | Root-to-Shoot Dry Weight Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watering | None | 30.39 ± 0.29 c | 3.30 ± 0.04 d | 0.95 ± 0.03 c | 2.13 ± 0.05 c | 3.08 ± 0.07 d | 0.45 ± 0.01 c |
| Reduced | 33.96 ± 0.30 b | 4.97 ± 0.08 c | 3.65 ± 0.10 b | 5.55 ± 0.18 b | 9.20 ± 0.26 c | 0.67 ± 0.02 b | |
| Periodic | 34.33 ± 0.32 b | 5.50 ± 0.06 b | 4.71 ± 0.13 a | 5.48 ± 0.13 b | 10.19 ± 0.14 b | 0.86 ± 0.02 a | |
| Full | 36.95 ± 0.37 a | 6.38 ± 0.09 a | 4.76 ± 0.18 a | 6.39 ± 0.22 a | 11.16 ± 0.38 a | 0.75 ± 0.02 b | |
| Additive | Control | 34.26 ± 0.33 a | 5.59 ± 0.09 a | 4.37 ± 0.17 a | 5.68 ± 0.18 a | 8.58 ± 0.32 a | 0.75 ± 0.02 a |
| Ectovit | 33.91 ± 0.26 a | 5.32 ± 0.11 b | 3.65 ± 0.14 a | 5.08 ± 0.18 a | 7.48 ± 0.31 a | 0.72 ± 0.02 a | |
| Agrisorb | 34.34 ± 0.26 a | 5.58 ± 0.09 a | 4.03 ± 0.14 a | 5.53 ± 0.17 a | 8.22 ± 0.34 a | 0.72 ± 0.01 a | |
| Treatment | Short Roots (No cm−1) | EMF Colonization (%) | F0 | Fm | Fv | Fv/Fm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watering | None | 3.83 ± 0.05 c | 31 ± 1.3 c | 0.29 ± 0.006 a | 1.21 ± 0.031 c | 0.93 ± 0.023 c | 0.76 ± 0.003 c |
| Reduced | 4.22 ± 0.09 b | 64 ± 2.9 a | 0.28 ± 0.007 a | 1.42 ± 0.037 ab | 1.14 ± 0.031 ab | 0.80 ± 0.002 ab | |
| Periodic | 4.66 ± 0.07 a | 55 ± 3.1 ab | 0.28 ± 0.008 a | 1.31 ± 0.036 bc | 1.03 ± 0.029 bc | 0.78 ± 0.003 bc | |
| Full | 4.94 ± 0.08 a | 44 ± 2.3 b | 0.29 ± 0.007 a | 1.54 ± 0.038 a | 1.25 ± 0.032 a | 0.81 ± 0.003 a | |
| Additive | Control | 4.62 ± 0.09 a | 41 ± 2.2 b | 0.28 ± 0.008 a | 1.34 ± 0.037 a | 1.06 ± 0.030 a | 0.79 ± 0.003 a |
| Ectovit | 4.53 ± 0.10 a | 57 ± 3.0 a | 0.27 ± 0.007 a | 1.33 ± 0.038 a | 1.06 ± 0.033 a | 0.79 ± 0.003 a | |
| Agrisorb | 4.42 ± 0.06 a | 47 ± 2.0 ab | 0.29 ± 0.007 a | 1.42 ± 0.039 a | 1.13 ± 0.032 a | 0.79 ± 0.002 a | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Repáč, I.; Belko, M.; Kucbel, S.; Sedmáková, D.; Parobeková, Z.; Pittner, J.; Vencurik, J. Drought Stress Response of Norway Spruce Seedlings Treated with Drought-Mitigative Additives. Forests 2026, 17, 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040420
Repáč I, Belko M, Kucbel S, Sedmáková D, Parobeková Z, Pittner J, Vencurik J. Drought Stress Response of Norway Spruce Seedlings Treated with Drought-Mitigative Additives. Forests. 2026; 17(4):420. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040420
Chicago/Turabian StyleRepáč, Ivan, Martin Belko, Stanislav Kucbel, Denisa Sedmáková, Zuzana Parobeková, Ján Pittner, and Jaroslav Vencurik. 2026. "Drought Stress Response of Norway Spruce Seedlings Treated with Drought-Mitigative Additives" Forests 17, no. 4: 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040420
APA StyleRepáč, I., Belko, M., Kucbel, S., Sedmáková, D., Parobeková, Z., Pittner, J., & Vencurik, J. (2026). Drought Stress Response of Norway Spruce Seedlings Treated with Drought-Mitigative Additives. Forests, 17(4), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040420

