Previous Article in Journal
Tree Size Inequalities Induced by Stand Age and Functional Trait Identities Control Biomass Productivity Across Stand Types of Temperate Forests in South Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Biomass Allocation and Allometric Equations in an Age Sequence of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis) Plantations

1
Hebei Engineering Research Center for Geographic Information Application, Institute of Geographical Sciences, Hebei Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
2
Hebei Academy of Forestry and Grassland Science, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
3
School of Tourism and Resource Environment, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2025, 16(12), 1760; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121760
Submission received: 8 October 2025 / Revised: 4 November 2025 / Accepted: 20 November 2025 / Published: 21 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Inventory, Modeling and Remote Sensing)

Abstract

Large-scale tree planting programs that store carbon provided by wood and non-wood products are being promoted to mitigate climate change. Assessing the biomass pool of plantations is thus an essential task in forest ecology. This study investigated biomass allocation and allometric equations for above- and belowground components along an age-sequence of Pinus tabuliformis plantations (8, 18, 32, and 46 years old) in northern Hebei Province, China. The biomass of each tree component (root, stem, branch, foliage) was quantified by destructive harvesting. Allometric equations and biomass conversion and expansion factors (BCEFs) were subsequently developed for each tree component. The mean above- and belowground biomass was 5.86, 20.05, 41.26, and 135.28 kg tree−1 and 1.73, 3.42, 11.39, and 27.30 kg tree−1 in the 8-, 18-, 32-, and 46-year-old stands, respectively. The proportion of stem biomass to total tree biomass increased from 28.7% for the 8-year-old stand to 55.8% for 46-year-old stand. In contrast, the contributions of foliage and branch decreased along the chronosequence. The root contribution to total tree biomass also showed a declining trend with stand age. Allometric models based on diameter at breast height showed a good fit (p < 0.001) and incorporating stand age as an additional variable improved the fit of allometric equations (higher R2 and lower ACI) for branch, aboveground, root, and total tree biomass. BCEFs decreased for all tree components as stand age increased. These findings indicate that changes in tree biomass allocation and allometry across stand development must be considered to improve estimates of plantation biomass and carbon stocks at regional and national scales.
Keywords: biomass allocation; allometry; chronosequence; destructive harvesting; conifer plantation biomass allocation; allometry; chronosequence; destructive harvesting; conifer plantation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, H.; You, H.; Yu, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X. Biomass Allocation and Allometric Equations in an Age Sequence of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis) Plantations. Forests 2025, 16, 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121760

AMA Style

Shen H, You H, Yu X, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Liu X. Biomass Allocation and Allometric Equations in an Age Sequence of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis) Plantations. Forests. 2025; 16(12):1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121760

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Huitao, Haizhou You, Xiaoya Yu, Tao Zhang, Yanxia Zhao, and Xin Liu. 2025. "Biomass Allocation and Allometric Equations in an Age Sequence of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis) Plantations" Forests 16, no. 12: 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121760

APA Style

Shen, H., You, H., Yu, X., Zhang, T., Zhao, Y., & Liu, X. (2025). Biomass Allocation and Allometric Equations in an Age Sequence of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis) Plantations. Forests, 16(12), 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121760

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop