Next Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Populations of Dastarcus helophoroides (Fairmaire) under High Temperature Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Global Warming Favors the Development of a Rich and Heterogeneous Mycobiota on Alien Vines in a Boreal City under Continental Climate
Previous Article in Journal
Application of a Panel Data Quantile-Regression Model to the Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration in Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis Natural Forests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chloroplast DNA Diversity in Populations of P. sylvestris L. from Middle Siberia and the Romanian Carpathians
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Weather Conditions and Climate Oscillations on the Pine Looper Bupalus piniaria (L.) Outbreaks in the Forest-Steppe of the West Siberian Plain

by
Denis A. Demidko
1,
Svetlana M. Sultson
1,
Pavel V. Mikhaylov
1,* and
Sergey V. Verkhovets
2
1
Scientific Laboratory of Forest Health, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarskii Rabochii Prospekt. 31, 660037 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
2
The Center for Research and Education “Yenisei Siberia”, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010015
Submission received: 17 November 2021 / Revised: 14 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Species Distribution and Diversity under Climate Change)

Abstract

:
The pine looper Bupalus piniaria (L.) is one of the most common pests feeding on the Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. Pine looper outbreaks show a feature of periodicity and have significant ecological and economic impacts. Climate and weather factors play an important role in pine looper outbreak occurrence. We tried to determine what weather conditions precede B. piniaria outbreaks in the southeast of the West Siberian Plain and what climate oscillations cause them. Due to the insufficient duration and incompleteness of documented observations on outbreaks, we used the history of pine looper outbreaks reconstructed using dendrochronological data. Using logistic regression, we found that the factor influencing an outbreak the most is the weather four years before it. A combination of warm spring, dry summer, and cool autumn triggers population growth. Summer weather two years before an outbreak is also critical: humidity higher than the average annual value in summer is favorable for the pine looper. The logistic regression model predicted six out of seven outbreaks that occurred during the period for which weather data are available. We discovered a link between outbreaks and climatic oscillations (mainly for the North Atlantic oscillation, Pacific/North America index, East Atlantic/Western Russia, West Pacific, and Scandinavian patterns). However, outbreak predictions based on the teleconnection patterns turned out to be unreliable. We believe that the complexity of the interaction between large-scale atmospheric processes makes the direct influence of individual oscillations on weather conditions relatively small. Furthermore, climate changes in recent decades modulated atmospheric processes changing the pattern predicting pine looper outbreaks: Autumn became warmer four years before an outbreak, and summer two years before became drier.

1. Introduction

One of the most substantial problems in forestry is large-scale outbreaks of defoliators, for example, repeated outbreaks of Dendrolimus sibiricus Tschetverikov in Siberia and the Russian Far East [1,2], Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) in North America [3,4], and Zeiraphera griseana (Hübner) in Western Europe [5]. The defoliation leads to both economic [6,7] and ecological [8] consequences. This challenge is even more meaningful considering that future climate changes can facilitate the onset of outbreaks of phyllophages [9] in both direct and indirect ways.
The pine looper, Bupalus piniaria (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera, Geometridae), is one of the most widespread pests feeding on Scots pine Pinus sylvestris Linneus. The species defoliates P. sylvestris in late August or early September when the most larvae are in last instars [10]. Pine looper outbreaks occur from 47° N (Austria) to 59° N (Vyatka) and from 2° W (Yorkshire) to 113° E (Transbaikalia) [10,11]. Defoliation of pine stands by B. piniaria often results in high (up to 100%) tree mortality rates [10,12] and causes heavy economic losses [13]. Scots pine is a commercially valuable tree species and plays an important ecosystem role. In this regard, it is essential to study the factors influencing the pest population fluctuations.
The pine looper is a monovoltine species. The flight of the imago in the southern part of Siberia occurs mainly from mid-June to mid-July. Hatching is quite extended: The first larvae appear at the end of June, and the last ones hatch in a month only. The start of hatching coincides with the budburst of Scots pine in the southern part of Siberia [10,14], which is under the control of May temperatures [15]. Until the end of August, the first to third instar B. piniaria larvae prevail; in September and October, most are fourth instar or older. In Siberia, the larvae have five instars [10,14], unlike in Europe, where a considerable number of individuals have six instars [16]. By mid-October, almost all individuals migrate to forest litter for pupation and overwintering. The end of October is their deadline to complete the pupation process [10,14]. All the active stages, from reactivated pupae to larvae before they migrate to shelters, under real conditions of the region, are positively dependent on temperature [14,17] and less on humidity [10,17]. Periods with temperatures exceeding the upper limit for this species (about 30 °C) [14] are rare and short [18], and their negative influence on B. piniaria populations is negligible. Although data on the effect of humidity on pine looper development are fragmentary, one can assume the higher the air humidity, the more instars are needed before pupation [17].
Outbreaks of forest defoliators depend highly on weather and climate [1,19,20,21,22,23]. By weather, we mean the aggregate of meteorological elements (temperature, precipitation, etc.) at a given moment, while by climate, we mean a long-term weather regime. Outbreaks of pine looper were stated to be linked to regional climate [24] and weather conditions prior to outbreaks [10,11,25]. It is considered proven that drought years contribute to higher abundance of B. piniaria [10,11,25]. However, extremely dry conditions, both weather [10] and climatic [24], are also unfavorable for pine looper. In this context, good results should be expected when predicting outbreaks of the pine looper based on the weather data from past years.
Weather conditions depend on oscillations—a large-scale atmospheric circulation that exhibits low-frequency variability over time [26]. Oscillations significantly influence climate in many parts of the globe, including territories distant from the centers of action, where teleconnection indices characterizing oscillations are measured [27]. The relationship between climate oscillations and insect outbreaks has been studied since the beginning of the 21st century ([28]; see review). For forest insects, the effect of oscillations on outbreaks has been shown for Dendrolimus punctatus (Walker) [29] and Z. griseana [5]. In both cases, the authors stated that oscillations had an impact on insect populations by stimulating weather changes.
Despite numerous arguments for a weather and climate role in provoking defoliator outbreaks, there are a small number of weather-based methods for their prognosis [1,10,30]. Such methods could be helpful to plan control measures early and, correspondingly, reduce defoliation. However, quantitative criteria proposed in these studies are regionally specific, developed based on a small number of outbreaks, and therefore need verification.
The pine looper periodically causes damage to pine forests in Southern Siberia [10,14,31]. It was previously shown that weather is associated with the start of pest outbreaks in South Siberian pine forests [10]. The regional climate is influenced by the processes occurring in other regions of the Earth to some extent [27,32]. We expect that relations in the “oscillations–weather–B. piniaria” system are sufficiently strong to use weather, oscillations, or both for pine looper outbreak forecasting. To accomplish the purpose, we considered the following issues (i) what weather conditions precede the pine looper outbreaks and can be used as predictors; (ii) what oscillations affect weather patterns essential to predicting outbreaks; and (iii) whether the oscillations are directly related to pine looper outbreaks. The study was based on the previously performed dendrochronological reconstruction of B. piniaria outbreaks [33].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Region

The research was carried out in southeast of the West Siberian Plain in the vicinity of Biysk town, Altai Krai (52.52° N, 85.30° E) (Figure 1). The landform is flat [34]. The climate is temperate, somewhat harsh, but warm and humid compared to other parts of the West Siberian Plain [34,35]. Vegetation of the region has undergone significant anthropogenic changes. Prior to agricultural development, the region was dominated by steppe alternating with birch forests [34]. Pine forests in the study region are intrazonal. They cover a small area (several tens of thousands of hectares) along the lower course of the Biya River and the upper reaches of the Ob River.

2.2. Study Objects

We used the results of dendrochronological reconstruction of B. piniaria outbreaks to accomplish the present study. We selected three Scots pine-dominated stands for the research (Figure 1). The stands are of mixtoherbosa (herb-rich) or pleuroziosa (green moss) forest types. None of the stands was subjected to strong anthropogenic impacts (felling, fire, heavy recreational load, etc.). All the stands are close to each other (ca. 5–38 km) and to the only nearby weather station Biysk-Zonal’naya (ca. 18–28 km). The reconstruction methods and results are described in detail in [33]. Briefly, we used standard technics for collecting and processing cores [36], measured ring- and seasonwood width with CDendro [37], and, after crossdating, reconstructed outbreak history using our novel method [33] and three other algorithms [38,39,40]. Literature data [10,14,31] and data received from the Altai Krai Forest Protection Center confirmed the reconstruction results. The outbreak reconstruction data for the Zarech’e site in [33] were the most exhaustive (see Section 3), so we chose them to compare with the weather and climate data. It was found (within the period for which instrumental weather data are available) that in the Zarech’e site, seven pine looper outbreaks occurred, which began in 1949, 1959, 1972, 1978, 1986, 1996, and 2001. For the two last outbreaks, the number of female pupae per m−2 in Zarech’e or nearby stands was from 4.4 to 7.8 (Altai Krai Forest Protection Center). This corresponds to 75 to 100% defoliation [41]. Unfortunately, the regular monitoring of B. piniaria population characteristics (e.g., density of pupae per m−2) has not been performed, with exception of the abovementioned outbreak years. Thus, for modeling we used the binary variable with values “year of an outbreak onset” and “not a year of an outbreak onset” as a dependent variable, but not numerical data.

2.3. Weather and Climate Data

Weather data were obtained from the Biysk-Zonal’naya meteorological station (52.69° N, 84.68° E) for the period 1936–2017 [18]. The following data were used as predictors: average monthly temperature (Temp, °C), monthly precipitation (Prec, mm), and the Selyaninov hydrothermal coefficient (HTC). Selyaninov hydrothermal coefficient characterizing aridity [42] was calculated using the following formula:
H T C = 10 P r e c T e m p
HTC was calculated only for months with an average monthly temperature of ≥10 °C. The higher the HTC values, the better the humidification conditions; a month with HTC ≤ 1 is considered arid [42].
To study the relationship between climate oscillations (hereafter, we consider ”oscillation” and ”teleconnection” synonymous for simplicity) and pine looper moth outbreaks, we used the following indices: Arctic oscillation (AO), North Atlantic oscillation (NAO), Pacific Decadal oscillation (PDO), Pacific/North America index (PNAI), Southern oscillation index (SOI), Scandinavian pattern (SCAND), East Atlantic/Western Russia pattern (EA/WR), Polar/Eurasia pattern (POL), and West Pacific pattern (WP). Monthly average indices were obtained from [43,44].
Preliminary results showed that using the characteristics of individual months as predictors of an outbreak does not give satisfactory results. Therefore, we aggregated weather data and oscillation indices for periods corresponding to stages of B. piniaria development in Southern Siberia: reactivation (April–May, HTC for May only); flight, oviposition, and hatching (June–July); young larvae feeding (June–August); and old larvae feeding and pupation (September–October, HTC for September only) [10,14]. For these periods, we calculated the sums of precipitation and HTC, mean values of temperatures and oscillation indices. Since the population growth begins several years before the year t when defoliation becomes noticeable [1,10,25,45,46], we considered temperature, precipitation, and HTC for several years preceding defoliation (t − 2…t − 5; a total of 48 predictors).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed with R 4.0.2 software. We used random forest regression (randomForest function, randomForest 4.6–14 package) to select weather characteristics most closely related to outbreaks of B. piniaria [47]. The dependent variable was the onset of defoliation (see Section 2.2) in the year t in Zarech’e, and the predictors were the characteristics of weather conditions (Temp, Prec, HTC) in previous years t − 2…t − 5.
The random forest algorithm represents the black box system, meaning it does not allow us to discriminate and describe the criteria for the classification. Therefore, we built an outbreak prediction model using logistic regression (glm function, stats 4.0.2 package). In this model, the probability P of an outbreak is estimated using the sigmoid function:
P = 1 1 + e a 0 + a 1 x 1 + + a n x n
where a0—intercept, a1an—coefficients, x1xn—predictors. At P > 0.5, defoliation by B. piniaria is expected in the given year. We selected predictors using the step function (stats 4.0.2 package) based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We assessed the prediction accuracy using a confusion matrix and the following statistics calculated on its basis (confusionMatrix function, caret 6.0–90 package): accuracy (percentage of correct predictions in total), sensitivity (percentage of correct predictions for outbreaks), and specificity (percentage of correct predictions for the absence of outbreaks) [48]. For multicollinearity estimation and pseudo-R2 calculation, we used performance 0.8.0 package (functions check_collinearity and r2_mcfadden, respectively) [49]. Cross-validation of the developed model was performed using the cv.glm function from the boot 1.3–27 package [50]. ANOVA (anova function, stats 4.0.2 package) was used to determine the statistical significance of the predictors.
We used Ward’s method (dist and hclust functions, package stats 4.0.2) to classify weather conditions preceding outbreaks.
We used wavelet analysis to study frequency characteristics of the time series and the coherence between outbreaks (and the associated weather characteristics) and oscillations. We used Morlet wavelets to perform the power spectrum analysis [51]. These algorithms were implemented in the WaveletComp 1.1 package [52] (functions analyze.wavelet for studying frequency characteristics and analyze.coherency for studying coherence). In addition, we used superposed epoch analysis (sea function, dplR package) [53] to study the relationship between outbreaks and oscillations.

3. Results

3.1. Weather Conditions as Predictors of Outbreaks

The random forest method showed that weather conditions four years before defoliation influenced pest outbreak regimes the most. Pine looper population growth in the t − 4 year is somehow influenced by the weather of the whole growing season: spring (April–May) and autumn (September–October) temperature, summer (June–August) precipitation and HTC, summer, and autumn (September) aridity. Also important is humid weather during spring (April–May for precipitation, May for HTC) in year t − 3 and summer (both precipitation and HTC of June–August) in year t − 2 (Figure 2A).
Using logistic regression, we identified the predictors allowing most accurate prediction of outbreaks. Typically, a pine looper outbreak is preceded by a warm spring, dry summer, and wet and cool autumn in t − 4 year, combined with a wet summer in t − 2 year (Figure 2B–G). However, the analysis of the obtained results proved the model (for which the predictors were chosen by the step function) (redundant model, R) to be redundant, i.e., it contained an excessive collinear predictor(s) and was overfitted as a result (see Acc, Sens, Spec, and R2MF value in Table 1). The reason is [54] that the coefficient for PrecJJA (t − 2) turned out to be negative (Table 1), while it was positively correlated with pine looper outbreaks (Figure 2G).
The additional analysis showed that redundancy was the data on the humidity in t − 2 year: The variance inflation factor of precipitation and HTC in this year was extremely high. The model (best model, B) constructed after excluding PrecJJA (t − 2) showed a slightly lower predictive ability (see CVadj, Acc, Sens, Spec, and pseudo-R2 values in Table 1), but at the same time, it stopped being redundant. An attempt to exclude HTCJJA (t − 2) instead of precipitation of the same period decreased forecast accuracy, despite the worse ANOVA results for HTCJJA (t − 2) compared to PrecJJA (t − 2) (Figure 2F–G); for this reason, the precipitation in t − 2 year was excluded from the B model. Notably, TempSO (t − 4) and HTCS (t − 4) demonstrate not very close (Spearman’s rho −0.4) but statistically significant (p = 0.0003) correlation (see Section 4).
Cluster analysis showed that the weather in the years preceding different outbreaks of the pine looper moth might differ markedly (Figure 3). It seemed most reasonable to distinguish two clusters: 1949, 1959, 1972, 1978, 1996 and 1986, 2001. The second cluster turned out to be too small to use statistical methods when comparing weather characteristics. Therefore, we simply stated the differences between these groups and between them and non-outbreak years (Table 2).

3.2. Frequency Characteristics of Outbreak Series

Wavelet analysis of outbreaks for the three studied stands showed their significant similarity (Figure 4). For all series, the most significant maximum average wavelet power falls on a period of ~5 years, which shows good agreement with the data for Bavaria [21]. However, for longer series, significant gaps between time intervals with sufficient wavelet power were noted (mid-1940s to late-1960s for Sokolovo, early 1960s to mid-1970s for Lesnoye). The reason is that these two stands were not damaged in the indicated periods [33]. Therefore, only the data for the Zarech’e site were included in the further analysis.

3.3. Links between Climate Oscillations, Outbreaks, and Weather

We assessed whether B. piniaria outbreaks in the Zarech’e stand and the oscillation indices averaged for different periods of the year were coherent. The assessment showed that each studied oscillation was somehow related to damage to the stands caused by this pest. In most cases, statistically significant coherence between outbreaks and oscillations appeared for periods close to those established by wavelet analysis for outbreak series (around 5 years; see Section 3.2).
Based on the assumption that oscillations affect pine looper outbreaks through weather conditions, we analyzed the coherence of weather characteristics with the oscillation indices for different periods of the year. The analysis confirmed the results obtained in the study of the relationship between oscillations and outbreaks. Namely, a statistically significant coherence (p = 0.1) was found for most combinations of “oscillation–weather characteristics–period of the year” (Table 3).
However, superposed epoch analysis showed no statistically significant association between any “oscillation–period of the year” combination and B. piniaria outbreaks. Logistic regression with teleconnection indices as predictors and the presence of outbreaks as a response predicted only one outbreak (three with one false-positive prediction if P (formula 2) was reduced to 0.4). The predictors selected using a step-by-step procedure based on the Akaike criterion were the SCAND and EA/WR indices for June–August in the t − 4 year and the EA/WR indices for the same period in the t − 2 year.

4. Discussion

4.1. Weather Conditions Preceding Pine Looper Outbreaks

Our analysis has shown that spring weather is one of the critical factors influencing insects’ development. Spring weather affects both B. piniaria and the preimaginal stages of its natural enemies. For example, earlier snowmelt accelerates the adult emergence of B. piniaria [14], prolonging caterpillar feeding. However, in our opinion, this factor primarily affects major parasitoids of the pine looper.
The most common species of parasitoids that attack B. piniaria in Siberia are Habrocampulum biguttatum (Gravenhorst), Heteropelma megarthrum (Ratzeburg) (both Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Anomaloninae: Gravenhorstiini), Blondelia nigripes (Fallén) (Diptera, Tachinidae, Exoristinae, Eryciini) and Senometopia pollinosa (Mesnil) (Diptera, Tachinidae, Exoristinae, Blondeliini) [10]. After wintering, they complete development for a rather long period. The mass emergence of their adults occurs ~10–20 days later than that of the host [14,55,56]. H. biguttatum and H. megarthrum overwinter in early stages of larval development [55]. It is possible that after wintering, they leave dormancy early to complete their development. Early spring reactivation is also characteristic for S. pollinosa [57] and presumably for B. nigripes belonging to the same subfamily.
Although air temperature is not the only factor influencing soil moisture during snowmelt [58,59], there is a direct relationship between these two characteristics [59]. Soil moisture increment affects parasitoid larvae that have emerged early, leading to the death of a significant number of them, for instance, two parasitoids attacking sawfly Pristiphora erichsonii (Hartig)—tachinid fly Bessa harveyi (Townsend) (Diptera, Tachinidae, Exoristinae, Exoristini) and ichneumon Mesoleius tenthredinis Morley (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae) [60]. Tachinid fly B. harveyi overwinters in the early stages of larval development, which leads to early reactivation and high sensitivity to a lack of oxygen under high humidity. Ichneumon wasp M. tenthredinis overwinters as larvae of the third and fourth instars, which allows them to emerge later and survive in high humidity levels during snowmelt when their metabolic rate is still low. This is consistent with numerous studies, stating that parasitoids are often less resistant to adverse external factors than their hosts [61]. Such data thoroughly explain the relationship between warm spring weather (temperature of April–May for t − 4 year) and B. piniaria outbreaks (Figure 2): Rapid snowmelt increased soil moisture leading to the death of a significant number of the wintering parasitoids, increasing pine looper survival rate [11].
The second assumed reason for positive influence of April and May temperatures on B. piniaria populations is the direct relationship between temperatures and reactivation rate [14]. Nevertheless, we suppose this impact has a minor influence in terms of outbreak onset because of the prevailing effect of parasitoids on the pupal stage [16]. The third possible reason for such influence is that Scots pine budburst and pine looper larvae hatching are synchronized. A similar effect takes place, for example, in populations of Z. griseana (=diniana) [62] on European larch and C. fumiferana on white spruce and balsam fir [4]. Nonetheless, one should reject this presumption because even young-instar B. piniaria larvae consume old needles firstly [10].
Droughts have direct and indirect, often contradictory, effects on insects. The direct effect is associated mainly with temperature regime change. The indirect effect is provided by various changes in food plants (in particular, changes in nutrients and entomotoxins concentrations). Direct and indirect impacts of drought allow plant-eating insects to escape from the control of their natural enemies, causing outbreaks [63]. Although droughts are not always favorable for phyllophagous insects [64], changes are often beneficial to them, at least outside arid regions [65]. Some research reports that dry weather contributes to the outbreaks of B. piniaria [10,11].
In Scots pine needles, the concentrations of nutrients increase under drought stress, namely soluble protein fractions [66], soluble carbohydrates, and non-structural carbohydrates in general [67]. Similar studies for other tree and shrub species confirm an increased concentration of soluble carbohydrates and amino acids (in particular, proline) during mild to moderate drought stress [68,69,70]. However, conflicting data can also be found [71]. Food quality as a factor determining pine looper moth population dynamics was considered earlier [11].
Drought also induces changes in the chemical composition of needles in a negative way for phyllophagous insects. For instance, for P. sylvestris, the increase in the content of phenolic compounds in needles was shown under drought conditions [66]. It was discovered for Diprion pini (Linnaeus) that an increase in the concentration of phenolic compounds in needles leads to a significant decrease in pupa and adult weight [72], on which the number of eggs per female depends in most insect species [73]. A direct relationship between body weight and fertility has also been described for B. piniaria [10], meaning that higher concentrations of phenolic compounds under drought stress negatively affect the number of eggs. However, this factor and the negative impact of low air humidity [10] seem to have a more negligible effect than increased needle nutrient contents. Thus, we associate the contribution of the decrease in summer HTC for t − 4 year with outbreaks progressing with increased needle nutrient contents. The direct influence of summer temperature on the pine looper larvae development in terms of its outbreaks is negligible (Figure 2).
Autumn weather of t − 4 year and summer weather of t − 2 year, in contrast to summer of t − 4 year, were wet and cool (Figure 2, Table 1), which needs explanation. It has been discovered that extremely low humidity is unfavorable for the pine looper moth larvae [10]. High humidity contributes to a rise in the number of larval instars, leading to increased pupal weight [17]. Since the size of B. piniaria pupae is directly related to fertility [10,16], high humidity during larval development in t − 2 year contributes to population growth.
It is somewhat more difficult to explain how autumn’s high humidity and low temperature in t − 4 year contribute to the pine looper population growth. We assume that it is not the increase in HTC (which is correlated with temperature) but the decrease in temperature that contributes to population growth. It was indicated for Siberia that a decrease in temperature stimulates larvae to descend from the canopy for pupation and wintering. Larvae that were late to shelter to the forest litter died en masse (up to ~80% of their amount in a crone) from ground frost in autumn [14]. It might also be noted that this factor is not considered to be significant in the milder climate of Western Europe [16,74]. Therefore, it can be assumed that low autumn temperatures stimulate the hibernation of late-instar larvae and thus decrease their mortality from ground frost.
Based on the interpretation of our results, we propose a principal scheme illustrating a B. piniaria outbreak development in the south of the West Siberian Plain (Figure 5). It should be mentioned that under real conditions, the outbreak could begin both earlier and later [33] than shown in the scheme.
However, not every known outbreak has followed this pattern entirely. The most critical factors were warm spring and dry summer in t − 4 year. In all cases, the April–May temperature exceeded the average values for non-outbreak years, while HTC was lower (Table 2). However, temperatures in September–October in t − 4 year before the 1986 and 2001 outbreaks were noticeable higher compared to both other outbreaks and average values for non-outbreak years. The summer in t − 2 year for these outbreaks was much drier than would be expected from the above scheme (Figure 5). In addition, the 1986 and 2001 outbreaks were characterized by a warmer spring in t − 4 year (Table 2).
Surprisingly, the attempts to use weather conditions in the prognosis of outbreaks of forest phyllophages are pretty rare. Despite the well-known relationship between weather and defoliation by insects (from both Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera) [20,21,25,75], there have been few efforts to develop a weather-based prediction method or at least identify some criteria [1,10,30,76].
The earliest attempts had been established on the simple usage of a single weather characteristic. Due to considerable evidence of drought’s dominant role in onset of outbreaks, the HTC was chosen as the prognostic criterion. In these prediction systems, droughts in two or more adjacent years are considered triggers of population increase to outbreak level. June and July for D. sibiricus [1] and September for B. piniaria [10] were proposed as critical periods when insect populations have the highest sensitivity to drought conditions. These prediction methods worked well on training sets but had not been validated. Hence, both methods have a clear biological basis, but their actual predictive ability is unknown. One more reason to use them with care is their simplicity: It looks incredible that only part of the year almost wholly controls population dynamics.
Later a successful attempt to use weather characteristics in spatiotemporal prognosis was made for C. fumiferana [76]. The goal of this prediction system differs from ours, making the results rather different too. Most of the predictors in the cited article describe numerical or spatial features of C. fumeferana populations. The only weather characteristic (cumulative degree days >5 °C of April) describes the conditions of the critical season (reactivation after wintering), as in the above-cited studies. Nevertheless, it follows the aim of prediction; spatial predictors play leading roles in spatial prognosis.
The approach closest to ours was used to predict Dendrolimus pini Linnaeus outbreaks [30]. Both developed prognosis methods are multi-predictor and rely on time intervals that are consistent with stages of insects’ life cycles. However, there are some differences between our results. First, HTC plays an essential role in D. pini activity [77]. Still, mainly temperature and, on a smaller scale, precipitation were included in the decision tree-based prognosis system in [30] as predictors. Second, it is claimed that the onset of D. pini outbreaks has been determined by two previous years only. This contradicts the our assumption that eruptive phyllophagous monovoltine species in forests (like B. piniaria) require population growth during three or more years to reach an outbreak level [45]. This discrepancy can be solved by assuming that D. pini outbreaks in the Northeastern German lowlands are not eruptive but ”prodromal”, i.e., simplistic, short-term and not accompanied by decreasing parasitoid control. The development of prodromal outbreaks is more rapid [45].
However, our results are limited in some respects. First, we do not consider the characteristics of stands and their temporal changes. Assuming the correctness of the statement that the most favorable conditions for pine looper outbreaks are in dense, middle-aged (from 40 to 80 years) Scots pine stands [41], we should suppose decreasing of their population with a stand aging. The same refers to the geobotanical features of stands; the most preferable wintering conditions for B. piniaria are under the feathermoss layer [10,14]. If the proportion of feathermoss-covered surface decreases (due to fires, logging, or, in the long-term perspective, climate changes), it will lead to the reduction in or even disappearance of pine looper-damaged stands.
Another limitation is related to specific features of B. piniaria population from different regions. The traits of weather impact on pine looper population from a distant part of their area can be diverse too. For example, it is suggested that in the southwestern part of the West Siberian Plain and Minusinsk Hollow, the critical precondition of an outbreak is dry August and September [10,78]. In Bavaria, the intensity of damage caused by B. piniaria demonstrates a non-linear relationship with winter temperatures [21]. Lastly, our results point out the significant role of low summer humidity and some other weather characteristics (see Section 3). Unfortunately, profound differences in used methods do not allow us to thoroughly analyze the reasons for these discrepancies.
Future climate changes can influence the population dynamics of defoliators positively or negatively. The first alternative is linked to warming and drying of climate [9], and the second one is to discrepancy between animal phenology and changed weather [79]. The example of the last alternative is Z. griseana populations in the Alps [5,22]. The cases of the positive impact of a more warm and dry climate are much more numerous, e.g., Coloradia pandora Blake in the Cascade Mountains [80], D. pini in Northeastern German lowlands [30], and some species in Western and Central Europe [81]. The same idea was proposed in research of temporal dynamics of outbreaks of Dendrolimus ssp. complex in the lower reaches of the Yellow River: The wetter the climate, the less area defoliated [20]. For B. piniaria, the first scenario is more plausible. The analysis of outbreak activity of this species in Bavaria had shown that outbreaks occurred more frequently during the period of warming (since the 1970s) [21]. The current climate of Siberia shows the tendency to become warmer than earlier [32,82,83]. Hence, it should be reasonable to forecast the increase in pine looper impact on pine forests in Southern Siberia.

4.2. Influence of Oscillations on the “Weather–Pine Looper” System

The influence of climate oscillations on Siberia, including the part where our sample plots are located, has been studied mainly in relation to their effect on temperature. In general, we can say for the study area that temperature is related to the ocean temperatures in the regions for which teleconnection indices used here are being calculated [27]. Previously, a link was established between spring, summer, and autumn temperatures of Western Siberia with some teleconnection patterns, in particular, AO, POL, WP, EA/WR, and especially SCAND [32,84]. Except for POL, our results confirm the link between the listed teleconnection patterns, as well as NAO and PNAI, and the weather characteristics used to predict the outbreaks of B. piniaria (Table 3). For NAO, this relationship is probably not causal but correlative. For example, the synchronicity of oscillations of AO and NAO is known [85].
Nevertheless, logistic regression and superposed epoch analysis showed no unambiguous relationship between pine looper outbreaks and climate oscillations. We believe that this is due to complex interactions of processes, which are reflected by the considered teleconnection patterns. For example, there is a link between AO and NAO, SOI with PDO, and NAO [85,86,87]. A complex system of relationships between different oscillations was described for Europe [88]. When the same weather characteristics depend on several oscillations [32,88], the same result can be achieved with different combinations of their indices. Thus, the direct contribution of individual oscillations to the formation of the weather is relatively small. This makes it difficult to find links between climate oscillations and insect outbreaks. For instance, the study on the role of NAO in the population size dynamics for 49 butterfly species in the United Kingdom showed that this oscillation had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) only on one of the species. For two more butterfly species, the significance of the contribution of NAO to population dynamics was at subthreshold levels (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1) [89].
Attention should also be paid to how weather factors that provoked outbreaks varied over time. Prior to 1986 the situation before the onset of outbreaks matched the scheme proposed above (Table 2, Figure 5), and then later, more or less noticeable deviations began (see the previous subsection). We assume that this is due to global changes in atmospheric circulation. Indeed, it was found for Western Siberia that the strength of the relationship between various circulation mechanisms and weather conditions changes significantly over time [84]. Similar processes are taking place in other regions of the Earth [90,91]. Therefore, we assumed that global changes led to a redistribution of the contribution of individual oscillations to weather and, consequently, to outbreak onset. Such temporal instability additionally complicates the study of the connection between oscillations and the processes that they affect.
Indeed, sometimes there is a change in the relationship between B. piniaria outbreaks and the phases of oscillations presumably associated with them. For example, before 1986 (inclusive), outbreaks were preceded by local PNAI maxima in April–May. In contrast, later outbreaks were preceded by local minima (Figure 6A). On the contrary, earlier outbreaks followed the minima of autumn EA/WR values, and after 1986, they came several years after the maxima (Figure 6B). One may assume that changes in the global atmospheric circulation led to a change in the contribution of individual weather characteristics to the formation of conditions favorable for outbreaks. Unfortunately, a detailed analysis of this assumption remains speculative. Neither the data on the pine looper outbreaks in the study region nor the length of the series of teleconnection patterns is insufficient.
Meanwhile, outbreaks of Z. griseana are associated with negative NAO values, which cause a decrease in November and winter temperatures [5]. At first glance, this contradicts our conclusions about the absence of a direct link between oscillations and the population dynamics of the species studied. However, the cited research deals with NAO fluctuations over decades. The link between short-term fluctuations in NOA indices and both larch budmoth outbreaks and its population growth that did not reach the outbreak is not evident (see Figure 3 in [5]). We studied the link between B. piniaria outbreaks and high-frequency oscillations, which determined the discrepancy between our conclusions and the research cited above.
Other attempts to substantiate the relationship between phyllophagous insects outbreaks and climate oscillations were carried out for El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and two insect species: Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman in the United States [23] and D. punctatus in China [29]. As for C. occidentalis research, the authors limited themselves to the assumption of such a link mediated by weather conditions [23]. The China study revealed a direct link between La Niña events (cold phases of ENSO) and D. punctatus outbreaks. The last results, however, are not entirely satisfactory. The paper does not describe the methodology for analyzing the link between teleconnection patterns and Masson pine caterpillar outbreaks. Only the results of their comparison are given ([29], Table 3), according to which four out of five outbreaks coincide with La Niña. The authors also ignored one of the recorded outbreaks and did not consider the appearance of La Niña between 1967 and 2009, when neither recorded nor reconstructed outbreaks were known. Thus, the question of how closely outbreaks of D. punctatus are related to ENSO has not been finally resolved.

5. Conclusions

Pine looper B. piniaria outbreaks in the forest-steppe of Western Siberia occur under the influence of weather conditions of previous years. The most important for their formation are the high temperatures of the middle and late spring and dry summer four years before outbreak onset. Low autumn temperatures four years before an outbreak and a humid summer two years before an outbreak are also significant. The temperature and moisture conditions affect the pine looper directly by reducing its mortality and increasing fertility and indirectly through an increase in the mortality of its parasitoids and a change in the quality of food. Analysis of weather conditions enables us to predict the damage of pine forests caused by this pest accurately. In the last few decades, however, a change in the contribution of individual weather elements to B. piniaria population dynamics has been noted.
Assuming that the global atmospheric circulation influences the weather conditions and, consequently, the pine looper population dynamics, we studied the contribution of individual atmospheric oscillations to outbreaks of this species. We determined that, in a number of cases, fluctuations in HTC and temperature values for periods of the year that are critical for the pine looper development are coherent with some oscillations (mainly AO, NAO, SCAND, EA/WR, PNAI, WP). However, attempts to directly relate changes in teleconnection patterns to B. piniaria outbreaks have generally been unsuccessful. We explain this by the presence of complex nonlinear interdependencies between different atmospheric circulation patterns, which does not allow us to find an unambiguous relationship between them and pine looper population growth. In addition, one cannot exclude the instability of the contribution of individual oscillations to B. piniaria outbreaks, associated with changes in the atmospheric circulation since the end of the 20th century.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.D.; methodology, D.A.D.; formal analysis, D.A.D. and S.M.S.; investigation, D.A.D., S.V.V. and P.V.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.D.; writing—review and editing, D.A.D. and S.M.S.; funding acquisition, P.V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was carried out within the project “Fundamentals of forest protection from entomo- and fittings pests in Siberia” (No. FEFE-2020-0014) within the framework of the state assignment, set out by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, for the implementation by the Scientific Laboratory of Forest Health.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to A.I. Khalaim, Zoological Institute of RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, for his help in selecting literature data on the biology of parasitic Hymenoptera.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kondakov, Y.P. The outbreaks patterns of Siberian silkmoth. In The Population Ecology of Siberian Forest Animals; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1974; pp. 206–265. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kharuk, V.I.; Im, S.T.; Ranson, K.J.; Yagunov, M.N. Climate-induced northerly expansion of Siberian Silkmoth Range. Forests 2017, 8, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Navarro, L.; Morin, H.; Bergeron, Y.; Girona, M.M. Changes in spatiotemporal patterns of 20th century spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern Canadian boreal forests. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mattson, W.J.; Simmons, G.A.; Witter, J.A. The Spruce Budworm in Eastern North America. In Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Patterns, Causes, Implications; Berryman, A.A., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 309–330. [Google Scholar]
  5. Büntgen, U.; Liebhold, A.; Nievergelt, D.; Wermelinger, B.; Roques, A.; Reinig, F.; Krusic, P.J.; Piermattei, A.; Egli, S.; Cherubini, P.; et al. Return of the moth: Rethinking the effect of climate on insect outbreaks. Oecologia 2020, 192, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa, P.; Tomppo, E. Impact of sawfly defoliation on growth of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae) and associated economic losses. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2002, 92, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Notaro, S.; Paletto, A.; Raffaelli, R. Economic impact of forest damage in an alpine environment. Acta Silv. Lignaria Hungarica 2009, 5, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jepsen, J.U.; Biuw, M.; Ims, R.A.; Kapari, L.; Schott, T.; Vindstad, O.P.L.; Hagen, S.B. Ecosystem Impacts of a Range Expanding Forest Defoliator an the Fores-Tundra Ecotone. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Seidl, R.; Thom, D.; Kautz, M.; Martin-Benito, D.; Peltoniemi, M.; Vacchiano, G.; Wild, J.; Ascoli, D.; Petr, M.; Honkaniemi, J.; et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Palnikova, E.N.; Sviderskaya, I.V.; Soukhovolsky, V.G. The Pine Looper in Siberian Forests. Ecology, Population Dynamics, Impact on Forests; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2002; ISBN 5-02-032018-8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Barbour, D.A. Pine Looper Moth in Britain and Europe. In Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Patterns, Causes, Implications; Berryman, A.A., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 291–330. ISBN 978-1-4899-0789-9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cedervind, J.; Långström, B. Tree Mortality, Foliage Recovery and Top-kill in Stands of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris) Subsequent to Defoliation by the Pine Looper (Bupalus piniaria). Scand. J. For. Res. 2003, 18, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Straw, N.A.; Armour, H.L.; Day, K.R. The financial costs of defoliation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) by pine looper moth (Bupalus piniaria). Forestry 2002, 75, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Prozorov, S.S. Pine looper Bupalus piniarius L. in the forests of West Siberia. In Proceedings of Siberian Institute of Forest Technology. V. XII, Iss. II; Siberian Forest Engineering Institute: Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 1956; pp. 13–84. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ovchinnikova, T.M.; Fomina, V.A.; Andreeva, E.B.; Dolzhkovaya, N.P.; Soukhovolsky, V.G. Analysis of seasonal development of woody plants in Stolby Natural Reserve with regard to climatic factors. Conifers Boreal Zo. 2011, XXVIII, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  16. Klomp, H. The Dynamics of a Field Population of the Pine Looper, Bupalus piniarius L. (Lep., Geom.). Adv. Ecol. Res. 1966, 3, 207–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gruys, P. Growth of Bupalus piniarius (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Relation to Larval Population Density; Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1970; ISBN 90 220 0300 0. [Google Scholar]
  18. RIHMI-WDC. Available online: http://aisori.meteo.ru/ClspR (accessed on 15 October 2020).
  19. Bao, Y.; Na, L.; Han, A.; Guna, A.; Wang, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Tong, S.; Bao, Y. Drought drives the pine caterpillars (Dendrolimus spp.) outbreaks and their prediction under different RCPs scenarios: A case study of Shandong Province, China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 475, 118446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bao, Y.; Wang, F.; Tong, S.; Na, L.; Han, A.; Zhang, J.; Bao, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, Q. Effect of drought on outbreaks of major forest pests, pine caterpillars (Dendrolimus spp.), in Shandong Province, China. Forests 2019, 10, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Haynes, K.J.; Allstadt, A.J.; Klimetzek, D. Forest defoliator outbreaks under climate change: Effects on the frequency and severity of outbreaks of five pine insect pests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 2004–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Johnson, D.M.; Büntgen, U.; Frank, D.C.; Kausrud, K.; Haynes, K.J.; Liebhold, A.M.; Esper, J.; Stenseth, N.C. Climatic warming disrupts recurrent Alpine insect outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20576–20581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ryerson, D.E.; Swetnam, T.W.; Lynch, A.M. A tree-ring reconstruction of western spruce budworm outbreaks in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33, 1010–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Broekhuizen, N.; Evans, H.F.; Hassell, M.P. Site Characteristics and the Population Dynamics of the Pine Looper Moth. J. Anim. Ecol. 1993, 62, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Straw, N.A. The impact of pine looper moth, Bupalus piniaria L. (Lepidoptera; Geometridae) on the growth of Scots pine in Tentsmuir Forest, Scotland. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 87, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barnston, A.G.; Livezey, R.E. Classification, Seasonality and Persistence of Low-Frequency Atmospheric Circulation Patterns. Mon. Weather Rev. 1987, 115, 1083–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salugashvili, R.S. The role of long-distant relationships in regional climatic fluctuations in West Siberia. In Proceedings of RIHMI-WDC. Iss. 176; Sherstukov, B.G., Ed.; RIHMI-WDC: Obninsk, Russia, 2012; pp. 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  28. Woli, P.; Ortiz, B.V.; Buntin, D.; Flanders, K. El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) effects on Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) infestation in the Southeastern United States. Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 1641–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bai, M.; Yao, Q.; Camarero, J.J.; Hu, H.; Dong, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, F.; Chen, X.; Guo, G.; Cao, X.; et al. El Niño-Southern Oscillation modulates insect outbreaks in humid subtropical China: Evidences from tree rings and carbon isotopes. Dendrochronologia 2021, 66, 125815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ray, D.; Peace, A.; Moore, R.; Petr, M.; Grieve, Y.; Convery, C.; Ziesche, T. Improved prediction of the climate-driven outbreaks of Dendrolimus pini in Pinus sylvestris forests. Forestry 2016, 89, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Egorov, N.N. Some harmful insects population dynamics in the protective forests of the Altai Krai for the last 20 years (1930–1949 incl.). In Proceedings of the Second Ecological Conference on the Problem: Animals Outbreaks and Their Forecasts; Part 3; Kiev State University Publishing House: Kiev, Ukraine, 1951; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gorbatenko, V.P.; Ippolitov, I.I.; Kabanov, M.V.; Loginov, S.V.; Podnebesnych, N.V.; Kharyutkina, E.V. Effect of atmospheric circulation on temperature variations in Siberia. Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 2011, 24, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  33. Demidko, D.A.; Trefilova, O.V.; Kulakov, S.S.; Mikhaylov, P. V Pine Looper Bupalus piniaria (L.) Outbreaks Reconstruction: A Case Study for Southern Siberia. Insects 2021, 12, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kuminova, A.V.; Vagina, T.A.; Lapshina, E.I. Geobotanical Regional Assignment of the South-Eastern Part of the West-Siberian Lowlands. In Vegetation of the Steppe and Wood Steppe Zones of Western Siberia (The Novosibirsk Region and Altai Territory). Transactions of the CSBG. Issue 6; Kuminova, A.V., Ed.; Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1963; pp. 35–62. [Google Scholar]
  35. Peel, M.C.; Finlayson, B.L.; McMahon, T.A. Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. 2007, 11, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Cook, E.R.; Kairiukstis, L.A. (Eds.) Methods of Dendrochronology. Applications in the Environmental Sciences; Springer-Science + Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlandes, 1992; ISBN 978-94-015-7879-0. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cybis Dendrochronology. Home of CDendro & CooRecorder. Available online: http://cybis.se/forfun/dendro/index.php (accessed on 15 October 2020).
  38. Swetnam, T.W.; Wickman, B.E.; Gene, P.H.; Baisan, C.H. Historical Patterns of Western Spruce Budworm and Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth Outbreaks in the Northern Blue Mountains, Oregon, since AD 1700; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR, USA, 1995.
  39. Fan, Z.X.; Bräuning, A. Tree-ring evidence for the historical cyclic defoliator outbreaks on Larix potaninii in the central Hengduan Mountains, SW China. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 74, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Humbert, L.; Kneeshaw, D. Identifying insect outbreaks: A comparison of a blind-source separation method with host vs non-host analyses. Forestry 2011, 84, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Il’inskiy, A.I.; Tropin, I.V. (Eds.) Monitoring, Field Surveys and Prognosis of Phyllophagous Insects Outbreaks in the Forests of USSR; Lesnaya Promyshlennost: Moscow, Russia, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vlăduţ, A.Ş.; Nikolova, N.; Licurici, M. Aridity assessment within southern Romania and northern Bulgaria. Hrvat. Geogr. Glas. 2017, 79, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Teleconnections. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). Available online: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/teleconnections/ (accessed on 13 February 2020).
  44. Climate Explorer: Climate Indices. Available online: https://climexp.knmi.nl/selectindex.cgi (accessed on 13 February 2020).
  45. Isaev, A.S.; Khlebopros, R.G.; Nedorezov, L.V.; Kondakov, Y.P.; Kiselev, V.V.; Soukhovolsky, V.G. Population Dynamics of Forest Insects; Isaev, A.S., Ed.; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2001; ISBN 5-02-004270-6. [Google Scholar]
  46. Baltensweiler, W.; Fischlin, A. The Larch Budmoth in the Alps. In Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Patterns, Causes, Implications; Berryman, A.A., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1988; pp. 331–351. ISBN 978-1-4899-0789-9. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liaw, A.; Wiener, M. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2002, 2, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuhn, M. Caret: Classification and Regression Training. R Package Version 6.0-84. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=caret (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  49. Lüdecke, D.; Ben-Shachar, M.S.; Patil, I.; Waggoner, P.; Makowski, D. performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. J. Open Source Softw. 2021, 6, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Canty, A.; Ripley, B. Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R Package Version 1.3-27. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/boot/ (accessed on 29 October 2020).
  51. Koronovskiy, A.A.; Khramov, A.E. Continuous Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications; Phizmatlit: Moscow, Russia, 2003; ISBN 5-9221-0389-X. [Google Scholar]
  52. Roesch, A.; Schmidbaue, H. WaveletComp: Computational Wavelet Analysis. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=WaveletComp (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  53. Bunn, A.G. A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 2008, 26, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Falk, R.F.; Miller, N.B. A Primer for Soft Modeling, 1st ed.; The University of Akron Press: Akron, OH, USA, 1992; ISBN 0962262846, 9780962262845. [Google Scholar]
  55. Schwerdtfeger, F. Untersuchungen über den “Eisernen Bestand” von Kiefernspanner (Bupalus piniarius L.), Forleule (Panolis flammea Schiff.) und Kiefernschwärmer (Hyloicus pinastri L.). Zeitschrift für Angew. Entomol. 1952, 34, 216–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Õunap, H. On the pupal parasitoids of the pine looper, Bupalus piniarius (L.) in Estonia. Balt. For. 1996, 2, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kolomiets, N.G.; Artamonov, S.D. Diptera as Entomophags of Forest Silkworm Moth; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1994; ISBN 5-02-030833-1. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ambadan, J.T.; Berg, A.A.; Merryfield, W.J.; Lee, W.-S. Influence of snowmelt on soil moisture and on near surface air temperature during winter–spring transition season. Clim. Dyn. 2017, 51, 1295–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hasebe, M.; Kumekawa, T. Estimation of snowmelt volume using air temperature and wind speed. Environ. Int. 1995, 21, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Heron, R.J. The Relative Effects of Cocoon Submergence on the Mortality of the Larch Sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), and Its Parasite Bessa harveyi (Diptera: Tachinidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1960, 53, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Viktorov, G.A. The Ecology of Parasitic Entomophages; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  62. Baltensweiler, W.; Weber, U.M.; Cherubini, P. Tracing the influence of larch-bud-moth insect outbreaks and weather conditions on larch tree-ring growth in Engadine (Switzerland). Oikos 2008, 117, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mattson, W.J.; Haack, R.A. The Role of Drought in Outbreaks of Plant-Eating Insects. Bioscience 1987, 37, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rouault, G.; Candau, J.N.; Lieutier, F.; Nageleisen, L.M.; Martin, J.C.; Warzée, N. Effects of drought and heat on forest insect populations in relation to the 2003 drought in Western Europe. Ann. For. Sci. 2006, 63, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Teshome, D.T.; Zharare, G.E.; Naidoo, S. The Threat of the Combined Effect of Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors in Forestry Under a Changing Climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 601009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Carvalho, A.; Pavia, I.; Fernandes, C.; Pires, J.; Correia, C.; Bacelar, E.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Gaspar, M.J.; Bento, J.; Silva, M.E.; et al. Differential physiological and genetic responses of five European Scots pine provenances to induced water stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 215, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ivanov, Y.V.; Kartashov, A.V.; Zlobin, I.E.; Sarvin, B.; Stavrianidi, A.N.; Kuznetsov, V.V. Water deficit-dependent changes in non-structural carbohydrate profiles, growth and mortality of pine and spruce seedlings in hydroculture. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 157, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xiao, X.; Xu, X.; Yang, F. Adaptive responses to progressive drought stress in two Populus cathayana populations. Silva Fenn. 2008, 42, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Guo, K.; Fan, D.; Li, G.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, L.; Yang, R. Effect of drought on pigments, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst habitats of southwestern China. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Leuschner, C. Drought response of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)—A review. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2020, 47, 125576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Guo, X.; Peng, C.; Li, T.; Huang, J.; Song, H.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, M. The Effects of Drought and Re-Watering on Non-Structural Carbohydrates of Pinus tabulaeformis Seedlings. Biology 2021, 10, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Roitto, M.; Rautio, P.; Markkola, A.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Varama, M.; Saravesi, K.; Tuomi, J. Induced accumulation of phenolics and sawfly performance in Scots pine in response to previous defoliation. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Honěk, A. Intraspecific Variation in Body Size and Fecundity in Insects: A General Relationship. Oikos 1993, 66, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Broekhuizen, N.; Hassell, M.P.; Evans, H.F. Common Mechanisms Underlying Contrasting Dynamics in Two Populations of the Pine Looper Moth. J. Anim. Ecol. 1994, 63, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Klimetzek, D.; Yue, C. Climate and forest insect outbreaks. Biologia 1997, 52, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  76. Li, M.; MacLean, D.A.; Hennigar, C.R.; Ogilvie, J. Previous year outbreak conditions and spring climate predict spruce budworm population changes in the following year. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 458, 117737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Leśniak, A. Climatic and Meteorological Conditions of the Pine Moth (Dendrolimus pini L.) Outbreaks. Ekol. Pol. 1976, 24, 515–547. [Google Scholar]
  78. Raspopov, P.M. Outbreaks of forest phyllophagous insects in Chelyabinsk Oblast from 1949 to 1973 and control of their populations. In Proceedings of Ilmenskiy Natural Reserve. Iss. X; USSR Academy of Science, Ural Branch: Chelyabinsk, Russia, 1973; pp. 83–97. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ims, R.A.; Henden, J.A.; Killengreen, S.T. Collapsing population cycles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Clark, P.W.; Speer, J.H.; Winship, L.J. Identifying and Separating Pandora Moth Outbreaks and Climate from A 1500-Year Ponderosa Pine Chronology from Central Oregon. Tree-Ring Res. 2017, 73, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Netherer, S.; Schopf, A. Potential effects of climate change on insect herbivores in European forests-General aspects and the pine processionary moth as specific example. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ippolitov, I.I.; Kabanov, M.V.; Loginov, S.V. Spatiotemporal scales of warming observed in Siberia. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2007, 413, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ippolitov, I.I.; Loginov, S.V.; Kharyutkina, E.V.; Moraru, E.I. The changes of climate of Asian part of Russia in 1975–2012. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 2014, 4, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kleshchenko, L.K. About relationship between average-season air temperature and fluctuations of large-scale atmosphere circulation in Russia in the second half of XX century. In Proceedings of RIHMI-WDC. Iss. 176; Sherstukov, B.G., Ed.; RIHMI-WDC: Obninsk, Russia, 2012; pp. 194–213. [Google Scholar]
  85. Salugashvili, R.S. The climatic regions of Eurasia in the area of influence of Northern Atlantic. In Proceedings of RIHMI-WDC. Iss. 176; Sherstukov, B.G., Ed.; RIHMI-WDC: Obninsk, Russia, 2012; pp. 53–72. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kholoptsev, V.; Semenov, V.; Kononova, N.K. Long arctic invasion and El-Nino—Southern Oscillation. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Seriya Geogr. 2018, 4, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mokhov, I.I.; Smirnov, D.A. Study of the mutual influence of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation processes and the North Atlantic and Arctic Oscillations. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 2006, 42, 598–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rust, H.W.; Richling, A.; Bissolli, P.; Ulbrich, U. Linking teleconnection patterns to European temperature—A multiple linear regression model. Meteorol. Z. 2015, 24, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Westgarth-Smith, A.R.; Roy, D.B.; Scholze, M.; Tucker, A.; Sumpter, J.P. The role of the North Atlantic Oscillation in controlling U.K. butterfly population size and phenology. Ecol. Entomol. 2012, 37, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Nojarov, P. The increase in September precipitation in the Mediterranean region as a result of changes in atmospheric circulation. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 2017, 129, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. D’Agostino, R.; Lionello, P. Evidence of global warming impact on the evolution of the Hadley Circulation in ECMWF centennial reanalyses. Clim. Dyn. 2017, 48, 3047–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the Altai Krai (brown polygon on the Eurasia map), stands (red stars on the inset), and weather station (red circle in the inset). In inset: dark-gray areas—settlements, green areas—forested lands.
Figure 1. Location of the Altai Krai (brown polygon on the Eurasia map), stands (red stars on the inset), and weather station (red circle in the inset). In inset: dark-gray areas—settlements, green areas—forested lands.
Forests 13 00015 g001
Figure 2. Results of selecting predictors for outbreaks of B. piniaria using the random forest (A) and log-linear analysis (BG). (BG) illustrations for each predictor: months (AM, April and May; JJA, June–August; S, September; SO, September and October), number of years before outbreak (t − 2 and t − 4, consequently, two and four years before), and significance level of the predictor as determined by ANOVA.
Figure 2. Results of selecting predictors for outbreaks of B. piniaria using the random forest (A) and log-linear analysis (BG). (BG) illustrations for each predictor: months (AM, April and May; JJA, June–August; S, September; SO, September and October), number of years before outbreak (t − 2 and t − 4, consequently, two and four years before), and significance level of the predictor as determined by ANOVA.
Forests 13 00015 g002
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of weather conditions in the pre-outbreak years. The analysis involves the predictors used in model B (Table 1).
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of weather conditions in the pre-outbreak years. The analysis involves the predictors used in model B (Table 1).
Forests 13 00015 g003
Figure 4. Wavelet analysis of the series of pine looper outbreaks reconstructed from dendrochronological data (for the period with the available weather data).
Figure 4. Wavelet analysis of the series of pine looper outbreaks reconstructed from dendrochronological data (for the period with the available weather data).
Forests 13 00015 g004
Figure 5. Principal scheme representing the occurrence of pine looper outbreaks.
Figure 5. Principal scheme representing the occurrence of pine looper outbreaks.
Forests 13 00015 g005
Figure 6. Examples of temporal instability of relationship between oscillations ((A)—Pacific/North America index, (B)—East Atlantic/Western Russia pattern) and outbreaks. Black line—averaged April–May oscillation indices; red line—reconstructed oscillation indices series for period 4 to 10 years (computed by reconstruct function from package WaveletComp 1.1 [52]), and gray vertical lines—starting years of outbreaks except for 1949 (can not be detected by weather).
Figure 6. Examples of temporal instability of relationship between oscillations ((A)—Pacific/North America index, (B)—East Atlantic/Western Russia pattern) and outbreaks. Black line—averaged April–May oscillation indices; red line—reconstructed oscillation indices series for period 4 to 10 years (computed by reconstruct function from package WaveletComp 1.1 [52]), and gray vertical lines—starting years of outbreaks except for 1949 (can not be detected by weather).
Forests 13 00015 g006
Table 1. Logistic regression analysis. For each model, we indicated the predictor coefficients, AIC, adjacent cross-validation estimate of prediction error (CVadj), accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), and adjusted McFadden’s pseudo-R2 (R2MF).
Table 1. Logistic regression analysis. For each model, we indicated the predictor coefficients, AIC, adjacent cross-validation estimate of prediction error (CVadj), accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), and adjusted McFadden’s pseudo-R2 (R2MF).
ModelCoefficientsAICCVadjAccSensSpecR2MF
InterceptHTCJJA
t − 4
HTCS
t − 4
TempAM
t − 4
TempSO
t − 4
HTCJJA
t − 2
PrecJJA
t − 2
R−744.75−63.3863.51143.57−81.33380.71−7.32140.0581.0001.0001.0000.957
B−21.33−2.402.603.04−1.540.96 260.0910.9740.8570.9860.659
Table 2. Average values of weather characteristics influencing pine looper outbreaks (HTC is dimensionless, °C shows temperature). Weather characteristic symbols as in Table 1 HTCS (t − 4) are not shown here (see Section 4).
Table 2. Average values of weather characteristics influencing pine looper outbreaks (HTC is dimensionless, °C shows temperature). Weather characteristic symbols as in Table 1 HTCS (t − 4) are not shown here (see Section 4).
YearsHTCJJAt − 4TempAMt − 4TempSOt − 4HTCJJAt − 2
1949, 1959, 1972, 1978, 19962.098.665.705.22
1986, 20012.5411.358.552.89
Years with no further outbreaks3.807.446.953.52
Table 3. Coherence between climate oscillations and weather conditions–predictors of the pine looper outbreaks. The given periods (4 ≤ period ≤ 10) had the statistical significance of the average wavelet coherence ≤ 0.1. “-” indicates no such periods. Periods intersecting with the range in which the coherence between outbreaks and oscillation was statistically significant at p = 0.1 level are shown in bold. If we performed no analysis for “oscillation–weather characteristic” pair (the coherence with the outbreak was weak), the cell remains empty.
Table 3. Coherence between climate oscillations and weather conditions–predictors of the pine looper outbreaks. The given periods (4 ≤ period ≤ 10) had the statistical significance of the average wavelet coherence ≤ 0.1. “-” indicates no such periods. Periods intersecting with the range in which the coherence between outbreaks and oscillation was statistically significant at p = 0.1 level are shown in bold. If we performed no analysis for “oscillation–weather characteristic” pair (the coherence with the outbreak was weak), the cell remains empty.
OscillationWeather Characteristics
TempAMHTCJJATempSOHTCS
AO 4.14, 5.85–6.06, 6.50
NAO 4.00, 5.85–6.506.28–6.504.00–4.29, 7.46–8.00
PDO --
PNAI4.44–4.76, 8.88–9.514.00, 6.06–6.27
SOI7.73–8.00, 8.88–9.19
SCAND 4.00–4.14, 5.66–6.504.00–4.14, 8.004.14–4.29, 7.46–8.88
EA/WR 8.57–8.886.06–6.506.06
POL8.88
WP 6.064.00, 5.86–6.06, 6.73–6.966.06, 7.46
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demidko, D.A.; Sultson, S.M.; Mikhaylov, P.V.; Verkhovets, S.V. Influence of Weather Conditions and Climate Oscillations on the Pine Looper Bupalus piniaria (L.) Outbreaks in the Forest-Steppe of the West Siberian Plain. Forests 2022, 13, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010015

AMA Style

Demidko DA, Sultson SM, Mikhaylov PV, Verkhovets SV. Influence of Weather Conditions and Climate Oscillations on the Pine Looper Bupalus piniaria (L.) Outbreaks in the Forest-Steppe of the West Siberian Plain. Forests. 2022; 13(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demidko, Denis A., Svetlana M. Sultson, Pavel V. Mikhaylov, and Sergey V. Verkhovets. 2022. "Influence of Weather Conditions and Climate Oscillations on the Pine Looper Bupalus piniaria (L.) Outbreaks in the Forest-Steppe of the West Siberian Plain" Forests 13, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop